Mech. Engineering, Comp. Science, and Rad. Oncology Departments. Schools of Engineering and Medicine, Bio-X Program, Stanford University

Transcription

1 Mech. Engineering, Comp. Science, and Rad. Oncology Departments Schools of Engineering and Medicine, Bio-X Program, Stanford University 1

2 Conflict of Interest Nothing to disclose 2

3 Imaging During Beam Delivery Existing solutions are limited: Radiographic x-ray Electromagnetic Real-time marker-less soft-tissue image guidance during beam delivery is an unmet challenge 3

4 Novel Image Guidance Solution Linear Accelerator Haptic Interface Accelerator control console Treatment Intervention Patient 4D US probe Optical tracker US-guidance workstation computer US Robot Robot Control 3D US image stream US imaging system Probe position data (6 DOF) Telerobotic system enables remote probe control 4

5 Telerobotic Imaging Remote Haptic Interface Robot 5

6 Key Issues Remote ultrasound imaging during beam delivery! Robotic manipulator design! Treatment plan compatibility! Performance during radiation exposure Imaging robustness for multiple treatment sites Image guidance Temporal calibration and time delay Spatial calibration and accuracy! Details to appear in Medical Physics: Schlosser et al. (2010) 6

7 Telerobotic Imaging for Multiple Sites Prostate Volunteer Liver Volunteer Kidney Volunteer Pitch Force Time [sec] Image quality remotely maintained over 10 minutes 7

8 Image Guidance: Spatial Calibration unknown im T pr pr T tr tr T w F image F probe F tracker F treatment Goal: find im T pr Variation of planar fit method from Hartov et. al* *Hartov et al., Adaptive spatial calibration of a 3D ultrasound system, Med. Phys.,

9 Image Guidance: Spatial Calibration (1) Collect images of plate (2) Extract points on plane w p= w T tr * tr T pr * pr T im * im p (4) Optimize planar data fit (3) Convert to world frame 9

10 Temporal Calibration and System Evaluation: Experimental Method Image static target in US phantom Vary probe pitch or pressure Track target in real-time using NCC Use transformation chain to register in world frame Guidance Software Robot US probe Optical Tracker Phantom 10

11 Temporal Calibration and System Evaluation: Experimental Method Image static target in US phantom Vary probe pitch or pressure Track target in real-time using NCC Use transformation chain to register in world frame Guidance Software Robot US probe Optical Tracker Phantom 11

12 Temporal Calibration and System Evaluation: Experimental Method Image static target in US phantom Vary probe pitch or pressure Track target in real-time using NCC Use transformation chain to register in world frame Guidance Software Robot US probe Optical Tracker Phantom 12

13 Temporal Calibration and System Evaluation: Experimental Method Image static target in US phantom Vary probe pitch or pressure Track target in real-time using NCC Use transformation chain to register in world frame Guidance Software Robot US probe Optical Tracker Phantom 13

14 Temporal Calibration and System Evaluation: Experimental Method Image static target in US phantom Vary probe pitch or pressure Track target in real-time using NCC Use transformation chain to register in world frame Guidance Software Robot US probe Optical Tracker Phantom 14

15 Temporal Calibration Novel procedure: Robot pitches US probe w/ sinusoidal motion Static target imaged and tracked using NCC Optical tracker data compared to US pixel data Raw Data Sinusoid Model 92ms 15

16 Evaluation: Spatial Localization Error World Space Image Space World Space Magnified Variable Pitch Pressure Experimental Parameters -5 to Hz Tracking Error 0.4± 0.2 mm Max Tracking Error Real-time phantom localization error < 1mm 0 to 12N 0.6± 0.3mm 0.8 mm 1.3 mm 16

17 Evaluation: Spatial Localization Error World Space Image Space World Space Magnified Variable Pitch Pressure Experimental Parameters -5 to Hz Tracking Error 0.4± 0.2 mm Max Tracking Error Real-time phantom localization error < 1mm 0 to 12N 0.6± 0.3mm 0.8 mm 1.3 mm 17

18 Evaluation: Spatial Localization Error World Space Image Space World Space Magnified Variable Pitch Pressure Experimental Parameters -5 to Hz Tracking Error 0.4± 0.2 mm Max Tracking Error Real-time phantom localization error < 1mm 0 to 12N 0.6± 0.3mm 0.8 mm 1.3 mm 18

19 Evaluation: Spatial Localization Error World Space Image Space World Space Magnified Variable Pitch Pressure Experimental Parameters -5 to Hz Tracking Error 0.4± 0.2 mm Max Tracking Error Real-time phantom localization error < 1mm 0 to 12N 0.6± 0.3mm 0.8 mm 1.3 mm 19

20 Evaluation: Time Lag Experimental method: Similar to time calibration Robot trajectory (1000Hz) compared to target trajectory in ultrasound sequence Raw Data Sinusoid Model 179ms 20

21 Real-Time Guidance at 5 Hz and Sub-millimeter Localization Accuracy 21

22 Conclusions Remotely-controlled soft-tissue imaging in the treatment vault is feasible for multiple abdominal sites Sub-millimeter targeting accuracy with 2D imaging indicates feasibility for accurate real-time 3D ultrasound guidance Telerobotic US guidance system could offer non-invasive localization for IGRT that truly reflects soft-tissue anatomy 22

23 Questions? Investigator s: Mech. Engineering, Comp. Science, and Rad. Oncology Departments Schools of Engineering and Medicine, Bio-X Program, Stanford University 23