b-tagging activities Aug 9, 2007
|
|
- Brandon McCoy
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 b-tagging activities Aug 9, 2007 Meenakshi Narain Brown University (co-conveners of LPC btag: Gerber & Narain)
2 July 2007 Goals and Format Goal: General review of b tagging and vertexing Strategies and plans for how to measure performance with real data. Format: Presentations in the morning with afternoon for discussions & decisions Topics: Monday: Vertexing and btagging Tuesday: How to measure efficiency and mistags from data Wednesday: 1) How to use the measurements from data in our physics analyses and 2) effect of detector issues on performance of btagging Thursday: Trigger and Wrapup
3 Documentation and Infos b tag & vertex algorithm task lists & contacts on twiki page LPC btag workshop page: Comprehensive summary of various activities
4 Btagging/Vertexing Algos Many algorithms exist and implemented in CMSSW Performance being optimized Validation suites being developed
5 Vertex Reconstruction: VertexReconstruction Vertex Finding: Identification of vertices and assignment of tracks to vertices, with possible estimate of vertex position Offline primary vertex reconstruction Vertex finding in Jets Vertex Fitting: Most precise estimate of the vertex position and track parameters at vertex from a set of tracks Thomas Speer 9 th July p.2
6 Vertex Reconstruction: VertexReconstruction Vertex Finding: Identification of vertices and assignment of tracks to vertices, with possible estimate of vertex position Offline primary vertex reconstruction Vertex finding in Jets Vertex Fitting: Most precise estimate of the vertex position and track parameters at vertex from a set of tracks Vertices and b-tagging: Primary Vertex: determine origin of jet - fragmentation tracks originate from the PV impact parameters, flight distances, etc., are defined relative to PV Secondary vertex reconstruction Thomas Speer 9 th July p.3
7 Vertex Reconstruction: VertexReconstruction Vertex Finding: Identification of vertices and assignment of tracks to vertices, with possible estimate of vertex position Offline primary vertex reconstruction Vertex finding in Jets Vertex Fitting: Most precise estimate of the vertex position and track parameters at vertex from a set of tracks Vertices and b-tagging: Primary Vertex: determine origin of jet - fragmentation tracks originate from the PV impact parameters, flight distances, etc., are defined relative to PV Secondary vertex reconstruction Description of the algorithms Description of the VertexReco framework To-do list! Thomas Speer 9 th July p.4
8 In the beginning were the tracks... Persistent track: reco::track in DataFormats/TrackReco States stored: Initial State : For the primary tracks: 2D-PCA to beamline For the other tracks, where it makes the most sense E.g., for vertex constrained tracks, at the vertex On First and Last measurement layer For all states: (x, p) + curvilinear error (21 floats) Not suitable for most higher-level algorithms (e.g. vertex, b/ -tagging) no access to magnetic field (no propagation!) use Tracks through TransientTrack Thomas Speer 9 th July p.5
9 TransientTrack Transient track: reco::transienttrack (in TrackingTools/TransientTrack) Gives access to different states, etc New: state at PCA to arbitrary BeamLine, taking into account tilt. (e.g. for TIP w.r.t. to be helix-line PCA) Has access to magnetic field ReferenceCounted (à la TSOS) Different concrete classes: TrackTransientTrack, GsfTransientTrack, TransientTrackFromFTS Same interface In your application, build TT through TransientTrackBuilder: //get the builder from the EventSetup: edm::eshandle<transienttrackbuilder> theb; isetup.get<transienttrackrecord>().get("transienttrackbuilder",theb); //do the conversion: vector<transienttrack> t_tks = (*theb).build(trackcollection); Thomas Speer 9 th July p.6
10 Algorithms VertexFitters: Kalman Filter Adaptive Vertex Fitter TrimmedKalmanVertex Fitter Gaussian-Sum Filter and others, not ported to CMSSW: Least Trimmed Squares, Least Median of Squares, Minimum Volume Ellipsoid, Minimum Covariance Determinant, M-estimator... Vertex finders: TrimmedKalmanVertexFinder AdaptiveVertexReconstructor MultiVertexFit TertiaryTracksVertexFinder Thomas Speer 9 th July p.7
11 B-tag introduction Different b-tagging algorithms may have different features in term of performances (efficiency vs mis-tagging rate) robustness against detector effect (e.g. misalignment, tracker inefficiencies) possibility to measure its efficiency on data need for MC calibration, data only calibration or no calibration So, different analysis may want to use different algorithms
12 Structure of b-tagging The CMS b-tagging is now organized as a two phases process: first some tag info or tagging variables are computed for jet/tracks/vertices/leptons then the computed information are used to compute the discriminators (floats) that can be used in the analysis RECO Tracks Jets Calo,PF,Gen JetTracksAssociation Primary Vertex Muon data ECAL data TagInfos ImpactParameter IP 3D and 2D dlen, jetdist Track prob CombinedSV Secondary Vtx multiplicity, mass flight dist,... SoftLepton (X2) Lepton ID Ptrel, Lepton IP energy fraction,.. Discriminators (produced with a pluggable fwk) HighEff JetProb TkCnt HighPur MVA TkCnt IP Comb SV New3 MVA SV New1 Soft ele New2 Soft mu Soft mu noip
13 Lifetime based algorithms Algorithms in CMS exploiting lifetime: Combined Secondary Vertex Track Counting Jet probability Pixel detector needed for all lifetime algorithms pixel resolution ~50um SiStrip only resolution ~mm Track quality selection is also applied to reject tracks with badly measured impact parameters
14 Combined SV algorithm In CMS a combined algorithm based on SV is avaiable: Define 3 vertex categories: reco vertex, pseudo vertex, no vertex Computes in each case some vertex/jet properties such as: track multiplicity invariant mass decay length (in transverse plane) track rapidities (wrt jet direction) fraction of energy of the SV IP of first track above charm A likelihood function is used to combine the above information
15 CombinedSV variables FINAL DISCRIMINATOR
16 Soft lepton tagging A b-hadron can decay producing one or more lepton in three ways: direct decay b -> l - (BR 10%) via charm, b -> c -> l + (BR 8%) via anti charm, b -> cbar -> l - (1.6%) The main background for this algorithm are light meson decaying to leptons, photon conversion, and wrong lepton ID The Pt_rel and the IP of the lepton are used to increase the discriminating power
17 Performances ORCA / PTDR Tk Counting High Eff Jet Probability Combined SV Tools exists in RecoBTag/Analysis to study algorithm performance in a standard way The performances of the algorithms in CMSSW is almost at the level of PTDR Track Counting CombinedSV Probability MVA IP MVA SV Training/calibration still needed to get optimal performances MVA very preliminary but promising CMSSW
18 Vertexing/btagging US tasks Improve analysis / validation suite F.Yumiceva, V.Bazterra, C.Kopecky, L. Christofek, Puerto Reco (E.Ramirez et al.). Provide ultra-combined (MVA-based) b tag (L.Christofek, in collaboration with C.Saout). Make use of Muon ID default in b µ tag, to improve performance at low Pt. (Ping Tan) Check if Track (HitPattern) RECO/AOD object contains all info we need for b tagging (Z.Wan). Investigate use of track jets and DR association with CaloJets. (C.Gerber).
19 b tag performance w/ data Use of b mu to measure b efficiency (Ping/Gerber & Francisco/Narain/Bloch) Use of ve tags to measure uds efficiency (L.Christofek, Jeremy & Daniel) Use of t-t-bar to measure b and c efficiency (Kukartsev, Narain, Speer, Joris & Steven)
20 Methods for Performance Studies using data btag efficiency from ttbar events (Santa Barbara, Bruxelles) Use b-enriched sample of semileptonic ttbar events to estimate btag eff. SystemD method (FNAL, Brown, Strasbourg) Use muon+jet events and two ~uncorrelated taggers to measure the b-tagging efficiency. Pt-rel method (UIC, FNAL) Measure tagging eff. of lifetime based taggers using pt-rel distribution in muon+jet events Light quark mistagging rate from data (Strasbourg) Use ve impact parameter significance distribution in data to estimate light quark mistag rate
21 using µ+jet events System 8 Method Method requires events with 2 jets, one with a muon of Pt > 6 GeV. Make 8 measurements: µ+jets, µ+ jets tagged with lifetime, µ+ jets tagged with pt(rel); µ+ jets tagged with both. Repeat requiring away jet tagged by lifetime. Then solve for unknowns! Measured & true efficiencies b µ pt_rel efficency D.Bloch, M.Narain, F.Yumiceva b-lifetime tag efficency
22 System 8 Method Expected performance in early running: Use µ in jet trigger Back-of-the-envelope calculation (M.Narain, D. Bloch, F. Yumiceva): Relative systematic errors: ~10% at 10 pb -1 & ~3% for > 100 pb -1. Relative Statistical errors: 1 fb -1
23 pt-rel Method P. Tan, C. Gerber Use µ+jet events Determine b-fraction using a fit of templates to the muon pt-rel distribution b b ( pt ) + N f ( pt ) N! f! Extract btag efficiency from above fractions determined before and after applying other (lifetime based) tagger rel c c rel
24 The method We use semileptonic decays: From data: N 1, N 2, N 3 - number of events with 1,2,3 tagged jets Luminosity From MC: F ijk fractions of events with i b-jets, j c-jets, k light jets (no tagging, MC truth only) Selection efficiency sel We expect <N 1,2,3 > = f( b, c, l, F ijk, sel, lumi, ttbar ) Maximize loglikelihood and find b, c, ttbar : L= log PoissonN 1, N 1 Poisson N 2, N 2 Poisson N 3, N 3 July 30, 2007, Gena Kukartsev Tagging efficiency and ttbar cross section with semileptonic decays Slide 5 of 12 10
25 Toy result Solid lines true MC values b l c Discriminator value July 30, 2007, Gena Kukartsev Tagging efficiency and ttbar cross section with semileptonic decays Slide 9 of 12
26 Confidence levels Monte Carlo (equivalent ~ 100/pb) 68% confidence level # tags # events % confidence level July 30, 2007, Gena Kukartsev Tagging efficiency and ttbar cross section with semileptonic decays Slide 10 of 12
27 User Interface Software Design (V.Bazterra/ Thomas Speer) Will create DB DB contains TRF for DATA and MC with effi_b and effi_uds Will measure b, c & uds efficiency in data for 4 cuts (according to b tag efficiency) and for all b tag algorithms. Results stored in DB, as function of Et, rapidity Also store b tag cut value used. User interface: On data: bool pass = btag( Combined, Loose, Jet); On MC - use scale factor pair (pass, weight) = btag( Combined, Loose, Jet, Truth); Or on MC - use data TRF float effi = btag( Combined, Loose, Jet, Truth);
28 Tag Rate Functions Assume the following are measured and available in data for use: b-tag efficiency (TRF ε b ) derived using ttbar events or muon-jet events or a combination thereof. c-tag efficiency (TRF ε c ) Derived from ttbar events or c-jet MC scaled to dijet data rates ε c = ε c MC (ε b µ data/ ε b µ MC ) Light quark Mistag Rates (TRF lq) derived using negative tags using multijet events + MC correction factors Or maybe smarter method at a future date which uses all tags
29 TRFs TRFb TRFc TRF light
30 Multiple Operating Points 12 at Dzero AT CMS - if we want ALL btaggers for ALL jet definitions, we have at least 70 combinations!!! Need to think very carefully how to use btagging in any physics analysis if performance measurement is given from DATA and NOT purely MC based. Agreed on 4 operating points per tagger.
31 Multiple Operating Points Example from Dzero
32 Tagging Analysis Data MC Background/Signal Apply Selection Cuts Apply b-tagging Final Data Sample Apply Selection Cuts Calculating b-tagging probability Background/ Signal Estimation Analysis applies b- tagging two ways Driven by measuring efficiency on data, not MC!!
33 Estimating The Signal/Background Measure b-tagging efficiency on data, but wish to apply in MC or other non-b-quark data sample. Method 1 D (most analyses) Determine efficiency vs. jet p T, η, etc., on data, and use as lookup table in MC. Method 2 Determine MC-to-data tagging ratio vs. jet p T, η, etc., on data, and use as lookup table applied to tags found in MC. CDF/D Both require determining, in Data, the eff of a standard b-jet and matching it to MC jets Method 3 Use data sample with same flavor content of sample you are interested in, and derive tagging function (p T, η, etc.) and apply directly. (hbb/d )
34 Jet Tagging Probability For the MC event: probability for a jet of a given flavor α (b, c or light jet) to be tagged product of the taggability and the tagging efficiency
35 Event Tagging Probability For the MC event: Event tagging probabilities P event: derived by weighting each reconstructed jet in the event by the per jet tagging probability P α (pt, η) according to its flavor α, its pt and its η. The probability to have at least one tag in a given event
36 Using Multiple Operating points In the case that the working points are inclusive, i.e. a Tight jet is necessarily Loose. A jet can be defined as : Tight tagged (T), Loose but not Tight tagged (L) not Loose tagged (U). The probability of an event to pass a given tagging scheme is given by: where the sum is over all permutations of T, L & U
37 Tag Permutations The weighting procedure allow to estimate the number of tagged events, but does not give access to the actual tagged jets in the event. If one wants to use kinematic variables using the tagged or untagged jets, then we need to consider each permutation in the sum separately.
38 Conclusions Many US participants now plugged into mainstream issues in btagging/vertexing A successful workshop with a lot of discussion with all key developers of btagging Many issues - mostly emphasizing how to measure performance from data and how to use them in physics analyses were discussed. This led to change in thinking of the group and hence agreement for possible modifications of the taggers to allow this Develop Framework to measure performance from Data Start a dialogue with the physics groups on proposal for using btagging in the analyses (plus develop framework)
PoS(ACAT08)101. An Overview of the b-tagging Algorithms in the CMS Offline Software. Christophe Saout
An Overview of the b-tagging Algorithms in the CMS Offline Software Christophe Saout CERN, Geneva, Switzerland E-mail: christophe.saout@cern.ch The CMS Offline software contains a widespread set of algorithms
More informationPoS(IHEP-LHC-2011)002
and b-tagging performance in ATLAS Università degli Studi di Milano and INFN Milano E-mail: andrea.favareto@mi.infn.it The ATLAS Inner Detector is designed to provide precision tracking information at
More informationStudy of the Higgs boson coupling to the top quark and of the b jet identification with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider.
Study of the Higgs boson coupling to the top quark and of the b jet identification with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. Calvet Thomas CPPM, ATLAS group PhD day 25 novembre 2015 2 The
More informationRecent developments in tracking and
Recent developments in tracking and impact on B-tagging Boris Mangano for Tracking POG group page 1 Outline B-tagging Enemies Recent developments in iterative tracking and impact on V0 reconstruction efficiency.
More informationATLAS NOTE ATLAS-CONF July 20, Commissioning of the ATLAS high-performance b-tagging algorithms in the 7 TeV collision data
ALAS NOE ALAS-CONF-2-2 July 2, 2 Commissioning of the ALAS high-performance b-tagging algorithms in the ev collision data he ALAS collaboration ALAS-CONF-2-2 2 July 2 Abstract he ability to identify jets
More informationCMS Conference Report
Available on CMS information server CMS CR 2005/021 CMS Conference Report 29 Septemebr 2005 Track and Vertex Reconstruction with the CMS Detector at LHC S. Cucciarelli CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract
More informationb-jet identification at High Level Trigger in CMS
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS b-jet identification at High Level Trigger in CMS To cite this article: Eric Chabert 2015 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 608 012041 View the article online
More informationElectron and Photon Reconstruction and Identification with the ATLAS Detector
Electron and Photon Reconstruction and Identification with the ATLAS Detector IPRD10 S12 Calorimetry 7th-10th June 2010 Siena, Italy Marine Kuna (CPPM/IN2P3 Univ. de la Méditerranée) on behalf of the ATLAS
More informationTracking and Vertexing performance in CMS
Vertex 2012, 16-21 September, Jeju, Korea Tracking and Vertexing performance in CMS Antonio Tropiano (Università and INFN, Firenze) on behalf of the CMS collaboration Outline Tracker description Track
More informationb-jet slice performances at L2/EF
20 March 2007 Outline b-jet slice status b-tagging performance Status/Outlook b-jet slice The b-tagging selection is an element of flexibility in the ATLAS HLT framework: it might help to increase acceptance
More information8.882 LHC Physics. Analysis Tips. [Lecture 9, March 4, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements
8.882 LHC Physics Experimental Methods and Measurements Analysis Tips [Lecture 9, March 4, 2009] Physics Colloquium Series 09 The Physics Colloquium Series Thursday, March 5 at 4:15 pm in room 10-250 Spring
More informationTracking and flavour tagging selection in the ATLAS High Level Trigger
Tracking and flavour tagging selection in the ATLAS High Level Trigger University of Pisa and INFN E-mail: milene.calvetti@cern.ch In high-energy physics experiments, track based selection in the online
More informationTOOLS FOR DATA ANALYSIS INVOLVING
TOOLS FOR DATA ANALYSIS INVOLVING µ-vertex DETECTORS KalmanFitter package : Primary vertex fit Secondary vertex fit Decay chain TMVA package : Multivariate analysis 1 J. Bouchet Kent State University cτ
More informationTracking POG Update. Tracking POG Meeting March 17, 2009
Tracking POG Update Tracking POG Meeting March 17, 2009 Outline Recent accomplishments in Tracking POG - Reconstruction improvements for collisions - Analysis of CRAFT Data Upcoming Tasks Announcements
More informationarxiv:hep-ph/ v1 11 Mar 2002
High Level Tracker Triggers for CMS Danek Kotliński a Andrey Starodumov b,1 a Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland arxiv:hep-ph/0203101v1 11 Mar 2002 b INFN Sezione di Pisa, Via Livornese
More informationPoS(EPS-HEP2017)523. The CMS trigger in Run 2. Mia Tosi CERN
CERN E-mail: mia.tosi@cern.ch During its second period of operation (Run 2) which started in 2015, the LHC will reach a peak instantaneous luminosity of approximately 2 10 34 cm 2 s 1 with an average pile-up
More informationPerformance of the ATLAS Inner Detector at the LHC
Performance of the ALAS Inner Detector at the LHC hijs Cornelissen for the ALAS Collaboration Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Gaußstraße 2, 4297 Wuppertal, Germany E-mail: thijs.cornelissen@cern.ch Abstract.
More informationA new inclusive secondary vertex algorithm for b-jet tagging in ATLAS
A new inclusive secondary vertex algorithm for b-jet tagging in ATLAS Giacinto Piacquadio, Christian Weiser Albert-Ludwig University of Freiburg, Hermann-Herder-Str. 3, D-79104 Freiburg E-mail: giacinto.piacquadio@physik.uni-freiburg.de
More informationPrecision Timing in High Pile-Up and Time-Based Vertex Reconstruction
Precision Timing in High Pile-Up and Time-Based Vertex Reconstruction Cedric Flamant (CERN Summer Student) - Supervisor: Adi Bornheim Division of High Energy Physics, California Institute of Technology,
More informationTrack reconstruction for the Mu3e experiment based on a novel Multiple Scattering fit Alexandr Kozlinskiy (Mainz, KPH) for the Mu3e collaboration
Track reconstruction for the Mu3e experiment based on a novel Multiple Scattering fit Alexandr Kozlinskiy (Mainz, KPH) for the Mu3e collaboration CTD/WIT 2017 @ LAL-Orsay Mu3e Experiment Mu3e Experiment:
More informationTracking and Vertex reconstruction at LHCb for Run II
Tracking and Vertex reconstruction at LHCb for Run II Hang Yin Central China Normal University On behalf of LHCb Collaboration The fifth Annual Conference on Large Hadron Collider Physics, Shanghai, China
More informationStudies of the KS and KL lifetimes and
Studies of the KS and KL lifetimes and BR(K ) with KLOE ± ± + Simona S. Bocchetta* on behalf of the KLOE Collaboration KAON09 Tsukuba June 9th 2009 * INFN and University of Roma Tre Outline DA NE and KLOE
More informationFirst LHCb measurement with data from the LHC Run 2
IL NUOVO CIMENTO 40 C (2017) 35 DOI 10.1393/ncc/i2017-17035-4 Colloquia: IFAE 2016 First LHCb measurement with data from the LHC Run 2 L. Anderlini( 1 )ands. Amerio( 2 ) ( 1 ) INFN, Sezione di Firenze
More informationCMS Simulation Software
CMS Simulation Software Dmitry Onoprienko Kansas State University on behalf of the CMS collaboration 10th Topical Seminar on Innovative Particle and Radiation Detectors 1-5 October 2006. Siena, Italy Simulation
More informationA new inclusive secondary vertex algorithm for b- jet tagging in ATLAS
Journal of Physics: Conference Series A new inclusive secondary vertex algorithm for b- jet tagging in To cite this article: G Piacquadio and C Weiser 28 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 119 3232 Related content -
More informationTrack reconstruction with the CMS tracking detector
Track reconstruction with the CMS tracking detector B. Mangano (University of California, San Diego) & O.Gutsche (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory) Overview The challenges The detector Track reconstruction
More informationSiD Tracking using VXD. Nick Sinev, University of Oregon
SiD Tracking using VXD Nick Sinev, University of Oregon Plan Motivation Track reconstruction algorithm Performance for single tracks Does it have any limits? With backgrounds To do Motivation Tracking
More informationATLAS PILE-UP AND OVERLAY SIMULATION
ATLAS PILE-UP AND OVERLAY SIMULATION LPCC Detector Simulation Workshop, June 26-27, 2017 ATL-SOFT-SLIDE-2017-375 22/06/2017 Tadej Novak on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration INTRODUCTION In addition to
More informationATLAS, CMS and LHCb Trigger systems for flavour physics
ATLAS, CMS and LHCb Trigger systems for flavour physics Università degli Studi di Bologna and INFN E-mail: guiducci@bo.infn.it The trigger systems of the LHC detectors play a crucial role in determining
More informationHLT Hadronic L0 Confirmation Matching VeLo tracks to L0 HCAL objects
LHCb Note 26-4, TRIG LPHE Note 26-14 July 5, 26 HLT Hadronic L Confirmation Matching VeLo tracks to L HCAL objects N. Zwahlen 1 LPHE, EPFL Abstract This note describes the HltHadAlleyMatchCalo tool that
More information8.882 LHC Physics. Track Reconstruction and Fitting. [Lecture 8, March 2, 2009] Experimental Methods and Measurements
8.882 LHC Physics Experimental Methods and Measurements Track Reconstruction and Fitting [Lecture 8, March 2, 2009] Organizational Issues Due days for the documented analyses project 1 is due March 12
More informationH γγ. Sean Simon UC San Diego (on behalf of the H γγ WG) Photon Workshop July 23 rd 2008
H γγ Sean Simon UC San Diego (on behalf of the H γγ WG) Photon Workshop July 23 rd 2008 Contributing and interested groups Caltech, Lyon, Notre Dame, Rome, Saclay, UC Riverside, UCSD Signal and Background
More informationApplication of Neural Networks to b-quark jet detection in Z b b
Application of Neural Networks to b-quark jet detection in Z b b Stephen Poprocki REU 25 Department of Physics, The College of Wooster, Wooster, Ohio 44691 Advisors: Gustaaf Brooijmans, Andy Haas Nevis
More informationDirect photon measurements in ALICE. Alexis Mas for the ALICE collaboration
Direct photon measurements in ALICE Alexis Mas for the ALICE collaboration 1 Outline I - Physics motivations for direct photon measurements II Direct photon measurements in ALICE i - Conversion method
More informationPhysics CMS Muon High Level Trigger: Level 3 reconstruction algorithm development and optimization
Scientifica Acta 2, No. 2, 74 79 (28) Physics CMS Muon High Level Trigger: Level 3 reconstruction algorithm development and optimization Alessandro Grelli Dipartimento di Fisica Nucleare e Teorica, Università
More informationPhysics Analysis Software Framework for Belle II
Physics Analysis Software Framework for Belle II Marko Starič Belle Belle II collaboration Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana CHEP 2015 M. Starič (IJS) Physics Analysis Software Okinawa, 13-17 April 2015
More informationHPS Data Analysis Group Summary. Matt Graham HPS Collaboration Meeting June 6, 2013
HPS Data Analysis Group Summary Matt Graham HPS Collaboration Meeting June 6, 2013 Data Analysis 101 define what you want to measure get data to disk (by magic or whatever) select subset of data to optimize
More informationDijet A LL Dijet cross section 2006 Dijet A LL Preparation for Tai Sakuma MIT
Dijet A LL 2005 Dijet cross section 2006 Dijet A LL Preparation for 2008 Tai Sakuma MIT Motivation for dijet A LL is to constrain ΔG G with initial event kinematics The initial state variables can be written
More informationPerformance of Tracking, b-tagging and Jet/MET reconstruction at the CMS High Level Trigger
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Performance of Tracking, b-tagging and Jet/MET reconstruction at the CMS High Level Trigger To cite this article: Mia Tosi 205 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
More informationRobustness Studies of the CMS Tracker for the LHC Upgrade Phase I
Robustness Studies of the CMS Tracker for the LHC Upgrade Phase I Juan Carlos Cuevas Advisor: Héctor Méndez, Ph.D University of Puerto Rico Mayagϋez May 2, 2013 1 OUTLINE Objectives Motivation CMS pixel
More informationThe LHCb upgrade. Outline: Present LHCb detector and trigger LHCb upgrade main drivers Overview of the sub-detector modifications Conclusions
The LHCb upgrade Burkhard Schmidt for the LHCb Collaboration Outline: Present LHCb detector and trigger LHCb upgrade main drivers Overview of the sub-detector modifications Conclusions OT IT coverage 1.9
More informationMuon Reconstruction and Identification in CMS
Muon Reconstruction and Identification in CMS Marcin Konecki Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw, Poland E-mail: marcin.konecki@gmail.com An event reconstruction at LHC is a challenging
More informationStudy of t Resolution Function
Belle-note 383 Study of t Resolution Function Takeo Higuchi and Hiroyasu Tajima Department of Physics, University of Tokyo (January 6, 200) Abstract t resolution function is studied in detail. It is used
More informationL2 Global Status and Opportunities
L2 Global Status and Opportunities James T. Linnemann Michigan State University London Workshop January 6-8, 2000 J. Linnemann, MSU 01/12/2000 1 L2 Trigger 10 KHz L1 out to 1 KHz L2 out 128 L2 decision
More informationAutomated reconstruction of LAr events at Warwick. J.J. Back, G.J. Barker, S.B. Boyd, A.J. Bennieston, B. Morgan, YR
Automated reconstruction of LAr events at Warwick J.J. Back, G.J. Barker, S.B. Boyd, A.J. Bennieston, B. Morgan, YR Challenges Single electron, 2 GeV in LAr: Easy 'by-eye' in isolation Challenging for
More informationTORCH: A large-area detector for precision time-of-flight measurements at LHCb
TORCH: A large-area detector for precision time-of-flight measurements at LHCb Neville Harnew University of Oxford ON BEHALF OF THE LHCb RICH/TORCH COLLABORATION Outline The LHCb upgrade TORCH concept
More informationALICE tracking system
ALICE tracking system Marian Ivanov, GSI Darmstadt, on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration Third International Workshop for Future Challenges in Tracking and Trigger Concepts 1 Outlook Detector description
More informationATLAS ITk Layout Design and Optimisation
ATLAS ITk Layout Design and Optimisation Noemi Calace noemi.calace@cern.ch On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 3rd ECFA High Luminosity LHC Experiments Workshop 3-6 October 2016 Aix-Les-Bains Overview
More informationPoS(TIPP2014)204. Tracking at High Level Trigger in CMS. Mia TOSI Universitá degli Studi di Padova e INFN (IT)
Universitá degli Studi di Padova e INFN (IT) E-mail: mia.tosi@gmail.com The trigger systems of the LHC detectors play a crucial role in determining the physics capabilities of the experiments. A reduction
More informationGLAST tracking reconstruction Status Report
GLAST collaboration meeting, UCSC June 22-24 1999 GLAST tracking reconstruction Status Report Bill Atwood, Jose A. Hernando, Robert P. Johnson, Hartmut Sadrozinski Naomi Cotton, Dennis Melton University
More informationPhysics and Detector Simulations. Norman Graf (SLAC) 2nd ECFA/DESY Workshop September 24, 2000
Physics and Detector Simulations Norman Graf (SLAC) 2nd ECFA/DESY Workshop September 24, 2000 Simulation studies for a future Linear Collider We believe that the physics case for the LC has been made.
More informationDesign of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker (ITk) for the High Luminosity LHC
Design of the new ATLAS Inner Tracker (ITk) for the High Luminosity LHC Jike Wang (DESY) for the ATLAS Collaboration May/2017, TIPP 2017 LHC Machine Schedule In year 2015, ATLAS and CMS went into Run2
More information3D-Triplet Tracking for LHC and Future High Rate Experiments
3D-Triplet Tracking for LHC and Future High Rate Experiments André Schöning Physikalisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg Workshop on Intelligent Trackers WIT 2014 University of Pennsylvania May 14-16,
More informationTHIS paper describes vertex reconstruction in the AT-
Vertex Reconstruction in the Experiment at the LHC E. Bouhova-Thacker, T. Koffas, V. Kostyukhin, W. Liebig, M. Limper, G. Piacquadio, K. Prokofiev, C. Weiser, A. Wildauer, on behalf of the Collaboration.
More informationPoS(EPS-HEP2017)492. Performance and recent developments of the real-time track reconstruction and alignment of the LHCb detector.
Performance and recent developments of the real-time track reconstruction and alignment of the LHCb detector. CERN E-mail: agnieszka.dziurda@cern.ch he LHCb detector is a single-arm forward spectrometer
More informationTime of CDF (II)
TOF detector lecture, 19. august 4 1 Time of Flight @ CDF (II) reconstruction/simulation group J. Beringer, A. Deisher, Ch. Doerr, M. Jones, E. Lipeles,, M. Shapiro, R. Snider, D. Usynin calibration group
More informationXianyou Wang,Guoming Chen, Zheng Wang, Xianwei Meng, Jan Wang. Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing
Xianyou Wang,Guoming Chen, Zheng Wang, Xianwei Meng, Jan Wang Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing Outline Outline Motivation Argumentation The sample of InclusivePPmux The number of events will
More informationUpdate on Energy Resolution of
Update on Energy Resolution of the EMC Using µµγ Sample David Hopkins Royal Holloway, University of London EMC Reconstruction Workshop, December 5 th, 2004 Outline Study of photon energy resolution Compare
More informationMIP Reconstruction Techniques and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering
SLAC-PUB-11359 July 25 MIP Reconstruction Techniques and Minimum Spanning Tree Clustering Wolfgang F. Mader The University of Iowa, 23 Van Allen Hall, 52242 Iowa City, IA The development of a tracking
More informationOPERA: A First ντ Appearance Candidate
OPERA: A First ντ Appearance Candidate Björn Wonsak On behalf of the OPERA collaboration. 1 Overview The OPERA Experiment. ντ Candidate Background & Sensitivity Outlook & Conclusions 2/42 Overview The
More informationSilvia Miglioranzi University College of London / Argonne National Laboratories. June 20, Abstract
Tagging secondary vertices produced by beauty decay and studies about the possibilities to detect charm in the forward region at the ZEUS experiment at HERA Silvia Miglioranzi University College of London
More informationPerformance of the GlueX Detector Systems
Performance of the GlueX Detector Systems GlueX-doc-2775 Gluex Collaboration August 215 Abstract This document summarizes the status of calibration and performance of the GlueX detector as of summer 215.
More informationPoS(High-pT physics09)036
Triggering on Jets and D 0 in HLT at ALICE 1 University of Bergen Allegaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway E-mail: st05886@alf.uib.no The High Level Trigger (HLT) of the ALICE experiment is designed to perform
More informationThe performance of the ATLAS Inner Detector Trigger Algorithms in pp collisions at the LHC
X11 opical Seminar IPRD, Siena - 7- th June 20 he performance of the ALAS Inner Detector rigger Algorithms in pp collisions at the LHC Mark Sutton University of Sheffield on behalf of the ALAS Collaboration
More informationA New Segment Building Algorithm for the Cathode Strip Chambers in the CMS Experiment
EPJ Web of Conferences 108, 02023 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/ epjconf/ 201610802023 C Owned by the authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016 A New Segment Building Algorithm for the Cathode Strip Chambers in the
More informationPhysics Analysis Tools for Beauty Physics in ATLAS
Physics Analysis Tools for Beauty Physics in ATLAS Christos Anastopoulos 8, Eva Bouhova-Thacker 2, James Catmore 2, Steve Dallison 5, Frederick Derue 6, Brigitte Epp 3, Patrick Jussel 3, Anna Kaczmarska
More informationTau ID systematics in the Z lh cross section measurement
Tau ID systematics in the Z lh cross section measurement Frank Seifert1 supervised by Arno Straessner1, Wolfgang Mader1 In collaboration with Michel Trottier McDonald2 Technische Universität Dresden 1
More informationLAr Event Reconstruction with the PANDORA Software Development Kit
LAr Event Reconstruction with the PANDORA Software Development Kit Andy Blake, John Marshall, Mark Thomson (Cambridge University) UK Liquid Argon Meeting, Manchester, November 28 th 2012. From ILC/CLIC
More informationAdding timing to the VELO
Summer student project report: Adding timing to the VELO supervisor: Mark Williams Biljana Mitreska Cern Summer Student Internship from June 12 to August 4, 2017 Acknowledgements I would like to thank
More informationLatest development for ME-PS matching with MadGraph/MadEvent
Latest development for ME-PS matching with MadGraph/MadEvent S.de Visscher Universite Catholique de Louvain Center For Particle Physics and Phenomenology (CP3) Top meeting - 16th july 2007 Outline 1 2
More informationPrimary Vertex Reconstruction at LHCb
LHCb-PUB-214-44 October 21, 214 Primary Vertex Reconstruction at LHCb M. Kucharczyk 1,2, P. Morawski 3, M. Witek 1. 1 Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Krakow, Poland 2 Sezione INFN
More informationSoftware for implementing trigger algorithms on the upgraded CMS Global Trigger System
Software for implementing trigger algorithms on the upgraded CMS Global Trigger System Takashi Matsushita and Bernhard Arnold Institute of High Energy Physics, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Nikolsdorfer
More informationEvent Displays and LArg
Event Displays and LArg Columbia U. / Nevis Labs Slide 1 Introduction Displays are needed in various ways at different stages of the experiment: Software development: understanding offline & trigger algorithms
More informationLocating the neutrino interaction vertex with the help of electronic detectors in the OPERA experiment
Locating the neutrino interaction vertex with the help of electronic detectors in the OPERA experiment S.Dmitrievsky Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia LNGS seminar, 2015/04/08 Outline
More informationCMS Alignement and Calibration workflows: lesson learned and future plans
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings 273 275 (2016) 923 928 www.elsevier.com/locate/nppp CMS Alignement and Calibration workflows: lesson learned and future
More informationFirst results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Dec. 2009 Act 3: Initial Performance Chris Parkes for LHCb VELO group Vienna Conference 2010 2 Introducing LHCb LHCb is
More informationBoosted ZHLL analysis. Wataru OKAMURA 27/12/2011
Boosted ZHLL analysis Wataru OKAMURA 27/2/2 Used dataset NTUP_HSG5ZHLL - ZHllbb boosted Filter ZHllbb_boostedFilter.py (NTUP_HSG5ZHLL) at least jet from CamKt2LCTopoJets collection with pt>5 GeV either
More informationCharged Particle Reconstruction in HIC Detectors
Charged Particle Reconstruction in HIC Detectors Ralf-Arno Tripolt, Qiyan Li [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/marienburg_(mosel)] H-QM Lecture Week on Introduction to Heavy Ion Physics Kloster Marienburg/Mosel,
More informationTracking and Vertexing in 3D B-field
Tracking and Vertexing in 3D B-field Norman Graf (SLAC) HPS Collaboration Meeting, JLab October 26, 2015 Track Extrapolation At the heart of both track and vertex fitting in the presence of a non-uniform
More informationTrack reconstruction of real cosmic muon events with CMS tracker detector
Track reconstruction of real cosmic muon events with CMS tracker detector Piergiulio Lenzi a, Chiara Genta a, Boris Mangano b a Università degli Studi di Firenze and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
More informationOptimisation Studies for the CLIC Vertex-Detector Geometry
CLICdp-Note04-002 4 July 204 Optimisation Studies for the CLIC Vertex-Detector Geometry Niloufar Alipour Tehrani, Philipp Roloff CERN, Switzerland, ETH Zürich, Switzerland Abstract An improved CLIC detector
More informationTopics for the TKR Software Review Tracy Usher, Leon Rochester
Topics for the TKR Software Review Tracy Usher, Leon Rochester Progress in reconstruction Reconstruction short-term plans Simulation Calibration issues Balloon-specific support Personnel and Schedule TKR
More informationStephen J. Gowdy (CERN) 12 th September 2012 XLDB Conference FINDING THE HIGGS IN THE HAYSTACK(S)
Stephen J. Gowdy (CERN) 12 th September 2012 XLDB Conference FINDING THE HIGGS IN THE HAYSTACK(S) Overview Large Hadron Collider (LHC) Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment The Challenge Worldwide LHC
More informationRivet. July , CERN
Rivet Chris Gütschow (UC London) Chris Pollard (Glasgow) Deepak Kar (Witwatersrand) Holger Schulz (Durham) July 13 2016, CERN H. Schulz Rivet 1 / 19 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Basic work cycle 3 Writing
More informationStefania Beolè (Università di Torino e INFN) for the ALICE Collaboration. TIPP Chicago, June 9-14
ALICE SDD ITS performance with pp and Pb-Pb beams Stefania Beolè (Università di Torino e INFN) for the ALICE Collaboration - Chicago, June 9-14 Inner Tracking System (I) Six layers of silicon detectors
More informationATLAS Simulation Computing Performance and Pile-Up Simulation in ATLAS
ATLAS Simulation Computing Performance and Pile-Up Simulation in ATLAS John Chapman On behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration LPCC Detector Simulation Workshop 6th-7th October 2011, CERN Techniques For Improving
More informationAlignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector
Alignment of the ATLAS Inner Detector Heather M. Gray [1,2] on behalf of the ATLAS ID Alignment Group [1] California Institute of Technology [2] Columbia University The ATLAS Experiment tile calorimeter
More informationTHE ATLAS INNER DETECTOR OPERATION, DATA QUALITY AND TRACKING PERFORMANCE.
Proceedings of the PIC 2012, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia THE ATLAS INNER DETECTOR OPERATION, DATA QUALITY AND TRACKING PERFORMANCE. E.STANECKA, ON BEHALF OF THE ATLAS COLLABORATION Institute of Nuclear Physics
More informationMachine Learning in Particle Physics. Mike Williams MIT June 16, 2017
Machine Learning in Particle Physics Mike Williams MIT June 6, 7 Machine Learning Supervised machine learning is a broad and evolving field. The most common usage in physics is training algorithms to classify
More informationMadAnalysis5 A framework for event file analysis.
MadAnalysis5 A framework for event file analysis. Benjamin Fuks (IPHC Strasbourg / Université de Strasbourg). In collaboration with E. Conte & G. Serret. MadGraph 2011 Meeting @ Academia Belgica (Roma).
More informationMonte Carlo programs
Monte Carlo programs Alexander Khanov PHYS6260: Experimental Methods is HEP Oklahoma State University November 15, 2017 Simulation steps: event generator Input = data cards (program options) this is the
More informationPerformance of the MRPC based Time Of Flight detector of ALICE at LHC
Performance of the MRPC based Time Of Flight detector of ALICE at LHC (for the ALICE Collaboration) Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche "Enrico Fermi", Rome, Italy Dipartimento di Fisica
More informationCMS FPGA Based Tracklet Approach for L1 Track Finding
CMS FPGA Based Tracklet Approach for L1 Track Finding Anders Ryd (Cornell University) On behalf of the CMS Tracklet Group Presented at AWLC June 29, 2017 Anders Ryd Cornell University FPGA Based L1 Tracking
More informationPreliminary results in an ongoing study.
Comparison of Ground Cosmic Ray Photon Data in the LAT with GLEAM MC. Preliminary results in an ongoing study. CR Photon Working Group E. Bloom, A. Borgland, A. Bouvier, E. Charles, Y. Edmonds, S. Funk,
More informationATLAS NOTE. December 4, ATLAS offline reconstruction timing improvements for run-2. The ATLAS Collaboration. Abstract
ATLAS NOTE December 4, 2014 ATLAS offline reconstruction timing improvements for run-2 The ATLAS Collaboration Abstract ATL-SOFT-PUB-2014-004 04/12/2014 From 2013 to 2014 the LHC underwent an upgrade to
More informationThe Belle II Software From Detector Signals to Physics Results
The Belle II Software From Detector Signals to Physics Results LMU Munich INSTR17 2017-02-28 Belle II @ SuperKEKB B, charm, τ physics 40 higher luminosity than KEKB Aim: 50 times more data than Belle Significantly
More informationModelling of non-gaussian tails of multiple Coulomb scattering in track fitting with a Gaussian-sum filter
Modelling of non-gaussian tails of multiple Coulomb scattering in track fitting with a Gaussian-sum filter A. Strandlie and J. Wroldsen Gjøvik University College, Norway Outline Introduction A Gaussian-sum
More informationStatus of PID. PID in in Release Muon Identification Influence of of G4-Bug on on PID. BABAR Collaboration Meeting, Oct 1st 2005
Status of PID PID in in Release 18 18 Run Run 3,, Run Run 5 Muon Identification Influence of of G4-Bug on on PID The PID-Group: David Aston (*), Bipul Bhuyan (*), Thorsten Brandt, Kevin Flood, Jonathan
More informationReal-time Analysis with the ALICE High Level Trigger.
Real-time Analysis with the ALICE High Level Trigger C. Loizides 1,3, V.Lindenstruth 2, D.Röhrich 3, B.Skaali 4, T.Steinbeck 2, R. Stock 1, H. TilsnerK.Ullaland 3, A.Vestbø 3 and T.Vik 4 for the ALICE
More informationComputing strategy for PID calibration samples for LHCb Run 2
Computing strategy for PID calibration samples for LHCb Run 2 LHCb-PUB-2016-020 18/07/2016 Issue: 1 Revision: 0 Public Note Reference: LHCb-PUB-2016-020 Created: June, 2016 Last modified: July 18, 2016
More information