Stitching and Blending
|
|
- Chad Oliver
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Stitching and Blending Kari Pulli VP Computational Imaging Light
2 First project Build your own (basic) programs panorama HDR (really, exposure fusion) The key components register images so their features align determine overlap blend
3 Scalado Rewind
4 We need to match (align) images
5 Detect feature points in both images
6 Find corresponding pairs
7 Use these pairs to align images
8 Matching with Features Problem 1: Detect the same point independently in both images no chance to match! We need a repeatable detector
9 Matching with Features Problem 2: For each point correctly recognize the corresponding one? We need a reliable and distinctive descriptor
10 Harris Detector: Basic Idea flat region: no change in all directions edge : no change along the edge direction corner : significant change in all directions
11 Harris Detector: Mathematics Window-averaged change of intensity for the shift [u,v]: xy, [ ] 2 Euv (,) = wxy (, ) I( x+ uy, + v) I(, xy) Window function Shifted intensity Intensity Window function w(x,y) = or 1 in window, 0 outside Gaussian
12 Harris Detector: Mathematics Expanding E(u,v) in a 2 nd order Taylor series expansion, we have, for small shifts [u,v], a bilinear approximation: u Euv (, ) [ uv,] M v where M is a 2 2 matrix computed from image derivatives: M 2 Ix IxI y = w(, x y) 2 xy, II x y Iy I x = I(x, y) I(x 1, y)
13 Eigenvalues λ 1, λ 2 of M at different locations λ 1 and λ 2 are large
14 Eigenvalues λ 1, λ 2 of M at different locations large λ 1, small λ 2
15 Eigenvalues λ 1, λ 2 of M at different locations small λ 1, small λ 2
16 Harris Detector: Mathematics Measure of corner response: M 2 Ix IxI y = w(, x y) 2 xy, II x y Iy det M trace M = λλ 1 2 = λ + λ 1 2 R= det M k M ( trace ) 2 (k empirical constant, k = )
17 Harris Detector: Mathematics R depends only on eigenvalues of M λ 2 Edge R < 0 Corner R is large for a corner R > 0 R is negative with large magnitude for an edge R is small for a flat region Flat R small Edge R < 0 λ 1
18 Harris Detector: Workflow
19 Harris Detector: Workflow Compute corner response R
20 Harris Detector: Workflow Find points with large corner response: R > threshold
21 Harris Detector: Workflow Take only the points of local maxima of R
22 Harris Detector: Workflow
23 Not invariant to image scale! All points will be classified as edges Corner!
24 FAST Corners Look for a contiguous arc of N pixels all much darker (or brighter) than the central pixel p
25 It actually is fast
26 And repeatable! AUR = Area Under Repeatability curve
27 Point Descriptors We know how to detect points Next question: How to match them?? Point descriptor should be: 1. Invariant 2. Distinctive
28 SIFT Scale Invariant Feature Transform
29 SIFT Scale Invariant Feature Transform Descriptor overview: Determine scale (by maximizing DoG in scale and in space), local orientation as the dominant gradient direction Use this scale and orientation to make all further computations invariant to scale and rotation Compute gradient orientation histograms of several small windows (128 values for each point) Normalize the descriptor to make it invariant to intensity change D. Lowe. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints IJCV 2004
30 Match orientations
31 Determine the local orientation Within the image patch estimate dominant gradient direction collect a histogram of gradient orientations find the peak, rotate the patch so it becomes vertical 0 2π D. Lowe. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints IJCV 2004
32 Determine the scale We define the characteristic scale as the scale that produces peak of Laplacian response characteristic scale T. Lindeberg (1998). Feature detection with automatic scale selection. International Journal of Computer Vision 30 (2): pp
33 Blob detection in 2D Laplacian of Gaussian: Circularly symmetric operator for blob detection in 2D g = g(x 1, y) 2g(x, y)+ g(x +1, y) 2 x g g 2 g = σ 2 + norm x 2 y 2 2 2
34 Difference of Gaussians (DoG) Laplacian of Gaussian can be approximated by the difference between two different Gaussians
35 Create a pack of DoGs Fast computation, process scale space an octave at a time
36 Determine the scale Find a local maximum in space and scale D. Lowe. Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints IJCV 2004
37 ORB (Oriented FAST and Rotated BRIEF) Use FAST-9 use Harris measure to order them Find orientation BRIEF calculate weighted new center reorient image so that gradients vary vertically Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features choose pixels to compare, result creates 0 or 1 combine to a binary vector, compare using Hamming distance (XOR + pop count) Rotated BRIEF train a good set of pixels to compare P xi(x, y) P I(x, y), P yi(x, y) P I(x, y)
38 rbrief vs. SIFT
39 Aligning images: Translation? left on top right on top Translations are not enough to align the images
40 Which transform to use? Translation Affine Perspective 2 unknowns 6 unknowns 8 unknowns
41 Homography Projective mapping between any two PPs with the same center of projection rectangle maps to almost arbitrary quadrilateral parallel lines do not remain parallel but must preserve straight lines is called a Homography " wx' % $ ' $ wy' ' # $ w &' p To apply a homography H = " h 11 h 12 h 13 %" x% $ ' $ ' $ h 21 h 22 h 23 ' $ y' # $ h 31 h 32 h 33 &' # $ 1& ' compute p = Hp (regular matric multiply) convert p from homogeneous to image coordinates [x, y ] (divide by w) H p PP1 PP2
42 Homography from mapping quads Fundamentals of Texture Mapping and Image Warping Paul Heckbert, M.Sc. thesis, U.C. Berkeley, June 1989, 86 pp.
43 Homography from n point pairs (x,y ; x,y ) Multiply out wx = h 11 x + h 12 y + h 13 wy = h 21 x + h 22 y + h 23 w = h 31 x + h 32 y + h 33 Get rid of w (h 31 x + h 32 y + h 33 )x (h 11 x + h 12 y + h 13 ) = 0 (h 31 x + h 32 y + h 33 )y (h 21 x + h 22 y + h 23 ) = 0 Create a new system Ah = 0 Each point constraint gives two rows of A [-x -y xx yx x ] [ x -y -1 xy yy y ] Solve with singular value decomposition of A = USV T solution is in the nullspace of A the last column of V (= last row of V T ) " wx' % $ ' $ wy' ' # $ w &' p = " h 11 h 12 h 13 %" x% $ ' $ ' $ h 21 h 22 h 23 ' $ y' # $ h 31 h 32 h 33 &' # $ 1& ' H h 11 h 12 h 13 h 21 h = h 22 h 23 h 31 h 32 h 33 p
44 Example common picture plane of mosaic image perspective reprojection Pics: Marc Levoy
45 What to do with outliers? Least squares OK when error has Gaussian distribution But it breaks with outliers data points that are not drawn from the same distribution Mis-matched points are outliers to the Gaussian error distribution severely disturbs the Homography Line fitting using regression is biased by outliers
46 RANSAC RANdom SAmple Consensus 1. Randomly choose a subset of data points to fit model (a sample) 2. Points within some distance threshold t of model are a consensus set Size of consensus set is model s support 3. Repeat for N samples; model with the biggest support is the most robust fit Points within distance t of best model are inliers Fit final model to all inliers Two samples and their supports for line-fitting
47 K. Pulli, M. Tico, Y. Xiong, X. Wang, C-K. Liang, Panoramic Imaging System for Camera Phones, ICCE 2010 Hybrid multi-resolution registration Initial guess I.B. I.B. F.B. Image Based Feature Based F.B. F.B. F.B. Registration parameters
48 Feature-based registration Previous estimate Update search range invalid Feature Detection (Harris corners) Feature Matching (spherical coordinates) RANSAC Validity check Apply the previous registration estimate valid New estimate Convert to spherical coordinates Convert from spherical coordinates Best block crosscorrelation match
49 Progression of multi-resolution registration Actual size Applied to hi-res
50 Image blending Directly averaging the overlapped pixels results in ghosting artifacts Moving objects, errors in registration, parallax, etc. Photo by Chia-Kai Liang
51 Alpha Blending / Feathering
52 Alpha Blending / Feathering I blend = αi left + (1-α)I right =
53 Solution for ghosting: Image labeling Assign one input image to each output pixel Optimal assignment can be found by graph cut [Agarwala et al. 2004]
54 Faster solution with dynamic programming Input texture block B1 B2 B1 B2 B1 B2 Random placement of blocks Neighboring blocks constrained by overlap Minimal error boundary cut
55 Minimal error boundary with DP overlapping blocks vertical boundary 2 _ = overlap error min. error boundary
56 New artifacts Inconsistency between pixels from different input images Different exposure/white balance settings Photometric distortions (e.g., vignetting)
57 Solution: Poisson blending Copy the gradient field from the input image Reconstruct the final image by solving a Poisson equation Combined gradient field
58 Problems with direct cloning P. Pérez, M. Gangnet, A. Blake. Poisson image editing. SIGGRAPH
59 Membrane interpolation
60 Solution: clone gradient, integrate colors
61 Copy the details Seamlessly paste onto Just add a linear function so that the boundary condition is respected Gradients didn t change much, and function is continuous
62 SIGGRAPH 2009
63 Smooth interpolation over a triangulation
64 Alpha blending After labeling Poisson blending
65 Pyramid Blending
66 The Laplacian pyramid Gaussian Pyramid G 2 G n expand Laplacian Pyramid L n = G n L - = 2 G 1 - = L 1 G 0 L 0 - =
67 Laplacian Pyramid: Blending 1. Build Laplacian pyramids LA and LB from images A and B 2. Build a Gaussian pyramid GM from selection mask M 3. Form a combined pyramid LS from LA and LB using nodes of GR as weights: LS = GM * LA + (1-GM) * LB 4. Collapse the LS pyramid to get the final blended image
68 Laplacian level 4 Laplacian level 2 Laplacian level 0 left pyramid right pyramid blended pyramid
69 Pyramid Blending
70 Multi-resolution fusion
71 Simplification: Two-band Blending Brown & Lowe, 2003 Only use two bands: high freq. and low freq. Blends low freq. smoothly Blend high freq. with no smoothing: use binary alpha
72 High frequency (λ < 2 pixels) 2-band Blending Low frequency (λ > 2 pixels)
73 Linear Blending
74 2-band Blending
75 Additional reading Image Alignment and Stitching: A tutorial Richard Szeliski Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications Richard Szeliski Chapters 4, 6, 9
Feature Based Registration - Image Alignment
Feature Based Registration - Image Alignment Image Registration Image registration is the process of estimating an optimal transformation between two or more images. Many slides from Alexei Efros http://graphics.cs.cmu.edu/courses/15-463/2007_fall/463.html
More informationMotion Estimation and Optical Flow Tracking
Image Matching Image Retrieval Object Recognition Motion Estimation and Optical Flow Tracking Example: Mosiacing (Panorama) M. Brown and D. G. Lowe. Recognising Panoramas. ICCV 2003 Example 3D Reconstruction
More informationMosaics. Today s Readings
Mosaics VR Seattle: http://www.vrseattle.com/ Full screen panoramas (cubic): http://www.panoramas.dk/ Mars: http://www.panoramas.dk/fullscreen3/f2_mars97.html Today s Readings Szeliski and Shum paper (sections
More informationAutomatic Image Alignment (feature-based)
Automatic Image Alignment (feature-based) Mike Nese with a lot of slides stolen from Steve Seitz and Rick Szeliski 15-463: Computational Photography Alexei Efros, CMU, Fall 2006 Today s lecture Feature
More informationImage Stitching. Slides from Rick Szeliski, Steve Seitz, Derek Hoiem, Ira Kemelmacher, Ali Farhadi
Image Stitching Slides from Rick Szeliski, Steve Seitz, Derek Hoiem, Ira Kemelmacher, Ali Farhadi Combine two or more overlapping images to make one larger image Add example Slide credit: Vaibhav Vaish
More informationAutomatic Image Alignment
Automatic Image Alignment with a lot of slides stolen from Steve Seitz and Rick Szeliski Mike Nese CS194: Image Manipulation & Computational Photography Alexei Efros, UC Berkeley, Fall 2018 Live Homography
More informationPanoramic Image Stitching
Mcgill University Panoramic Image Stitching by Kai Wang Pengbo Li A report submitted in fulfillment for the COMP 558 Final project in the Faculty of Computer Science April 2013 Mcgill University Abstract
More informationProf. Feng Liu. Spring /26/2017
Prof. Feng Liu Spring 2017 http://www.cs.pdx.edu/~fliu/courses/cs510/ 04/26/2017 Last Time Re-lighting HDR 2 Today Panorama Overview Feature detection Mid-term project presentation Not real mid-term 6
More informationLocal invariant features
Local invariant features Tuesday, Oct 28 Kristen Grauman UT-Austin Today Some more Pset 2 results Pset 2 returned, pick up solutions Pset 3 is posted, due 11/11 Local invariant features Detection of interest
More informationComputer Vision for HCI. Topics of This Lecture
Computer Vision for HCI Interest Points Topics of This Lecture Local Invariant Features Motivation Requirements, Invariances Keypoint Localization Features from Accelerated Segment Test (FAST) Harris Shi-Tomasi
More informationToday s lecture. Image Alignment and Stitching. Readings. Motion models
Today s lecture Image Alignment and Stitching Computer Vision CSE576, Spring 2005 Richard Szeliski Image alignment and stitching motion models cylindrical and spherical warping point-based alignment global
More informationThe SIFT (Scale Invariant Feature
The SIFT (Scale Invariant Feature Transform) Detector and Descriptor developed by David Lowe University of British Columbia Initial paper ICCV 1999 Newer journal paper IJCV 2004 Review: Matt Brown s Canonical
More informationCS 4495 Computer Vision A. Bobick. CS 4495 Computer Vision. Features 2 SIFT descriptor. Aaron Bobick School of Interactive Computing
CS 4495 Computer Vision Features 2 SIFT descriptor Aaron Bobick School of Interactive Computing Administrivia PS 3: Out due Oct 6 th. Features recap: Goal is to find corresponding locations in two images.
More informationLocal features: detection and description. Local invariant features
Local features: detection and description Local invariant features Detection of interest points Harris corner detection Scale invariant blob detection: LoG Description of local patches SIFT : Histograms
More informationAugmented Reality VU. Computer Vision 3D Registration (2) Prof. Vincent Lepetit
Augmented Reality VU Computer Vision 3D Registration (2) Prof. Vincent Lepetit Feature Point-Based 3D Tracking Feature Points for 3D Tracking Much less ambiguous than edges; Point-to-point reprojection
More informationLocal features: detection and description May 12 th, 2015
Local features: detection and description May 12 th, 2015 Yong Jae Lee UC Davis Announcements PS1 grades up on SmartSite PS1 stats: Mean: 83.26 Standard Dev: 28.51 PS2 deadline extended to Saturday, 11:59
More informationSIFT: SCALE INVARIANT FEATURE TRANSFORM SURF: SPEEDED UP ROBUST FEATURES BASHAR ALSADIK EOS DEPT. TOPMAP M13 3D GEOINFORMATION FROM IMAGES 2014
SIFT: SCALE INVARIANT FEATURE TRANSFORM SURF: SPEEDED UP ROBUST FEATURES BASHAR ALSADIK EOS DEPT. TOPMAP M13 3D GEOINFORMATION FROM IMAGES 2014 SIFT SIFT: Scale Invariant Feature Transform; transform image
More informationLocal features and image matching. Prof. Xin Yang HUST
Local features and image matching Prof. Xin Yang HUST Last time RANSAC for robust geometric transformation estimation Translation, Affine, Homography Image warping Given a 2D transformation T and a source
More informationAutomatic Image Alignment
Automatic Image Alignment Mike Nese with a lot of slides stolen from Steve Seitz and Rick Szeliski 15-463: Computational Photography Alexei Efros, CMU, Fall 2010 Live Homography DEMO Check out panoramio.com
More informationLocal Features: Detection, Description & Matching
Local Features: Detection, Description & Matching Lecture 08 Computer Vision Material Citations Dr George Stockman Professor Emeritus, Michigan State University Dr David Lowe Professor, University of British
More informationBuilding a Panorama. Matching features. Matching with Features. How do we build a panorama? Computational Photography, 6.882
Matching features Building a Panorama Computational Photography, 6.88 Prof. Bill Freeman April 11, 006 Image and shape descriptors: Harris corner detectors and SIFT features. Suggested readings: Mikolajczyk
More informationBroad field that includes low-level operations as well as complex high-level algorithms
Image processing About Broad field that includes low-level operations as well as complex high-level algorithms Low-level image processing Computer vision Computational photography Several procedures and
More informationTargil 10 : Why Mosaic? Why is this a challenge? Exposure differences Scene illumination Miss-registration Moving objects
Why Mosaic? Are you getting the whole picture? Compact Camera FOV = 5 x 35 Targil : Panoramas - Stitching and Blending Some slides from Alexei Efros 2 Slide from Brown & Lowe Why Mosaic? Are you getting
More informationWikipedia - Mysid
Wikipedia - Mysid Erik Brynjolfsson, MIT Filtering Edges Corners Feature points Also called interest points, key points, etc. Often described as local features. Szeliski 4.1 Slides from Rick Szeliski,
More informationCEE598 - Visual Sensing for Civil Infrastructure Eng. & Mgmt.
CEE598 - Visual Sensing for Civil Infrastructure Eng. & Mgmt. Section 10 - Detectors part II Descriptors Mani Golparvar-Fard Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 3129D, Newmark Civil Engineering
More informationAnnouncements. Mosaics. How to do it? Image Mosaics
Announcements Mosaics Project artifact voting Project 2 out today (help session at end of class) http://www.destination36.com/start.htm http://www.vrseattle.com/html/vrview.php?cat_id=&vrs_id=vrs38 Today
More informationMidterm Examination CS 534: Computational Photography
Midterm Examination CS 534: Computational Photography November 3, 2016 NAME: Problem Score Max Score 1 6 2 8 3 9 4 12 5 4 6 13 7 7 8 6 9 9 10 6 11 14 12 6 Total 100 1 of 8 1. [6] (a) [3] What camera setting(s)
More informationLocal Feature Detectors
Local Feature Detectors Selim Aksoy Department of Computer Engineering Bilkent University saksoy@cs.bilkent.edu.tr Slides adapted from Cordelia Schmid and David Lowe, CVPR 2003 Tutorial, Matthew Brown,
More informationObject Recognition with Invariant Features
Object Recognition with Invariant Features Definition: Identify objects or scenes and determine their pose and model parameters Applications Industrial automation and inspection Mobile robots, toys, user
More information3D from Photographs: Automatic Matching of Images. Dr Francesco Banterle
3D from Photographs: Automatic Matching of Images Dr Francesco Banterle francesco.banterle@isti.cnr.it 3D from Photographs Automatic Matching of Images Camera Calibration Photographs Surface Reconstruction
More informationBSB663 Image Processing Pinar Duygulu. Slides are adapted from Selim Aksoy
BSB663 Image Processing Pinar Duygulu Slides are adapted from Selim Aksoy Image matching Image matching is a fundamental aspect of many problems in computer vision. Object or scene recognition Solving
More informationScale Invariant Feature Transform
Why do we care about matching features? Scale Invariant Feature Transform Camera calibration Stereo Tracking/SFM Image moiaicing Object/activity Recognition Objection representation and recognition Automatic
More informationAnnouncements. Mosaics. Image Mosaics. How to do it? Basic Procedure Take a sequence of images from the same position =
Announcements Project 2 out today panorama signup help session at end of class Today mosaic recap blending Mosaics Full screen panoramas (cubic): http://www.panoramas.dk/ Mars: http://www.panoramas.dk/fullscreen3/f2_mars97.html
More informationSIFT - scale-invariant feature transform Konrad Schindler
SIFT - scale-invariant feature transform Konrad Schindler Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Invariant interest points Goal match points between images with very different scale, orientation, projective
More informationCS 1674: Intro to Computer Vision. Midterm Review. Prof. Adriana Kovashka University of Pittsburgh October 10, 2016
CS 1674: Intro to Computer Vision Midterm Review Prof. Adriana Kovashka University of Pittsburgh October 10, 2016 Reminders The midterm exam is in class on this coming Wednesday There will be no make-up
More informationLecture: RANSAC and feature detectors
Lecture: RANSAC and feature detectors Juan Carlos Niebles and Ranjay Krishna Stanford Vision and Learning Lab 1 What we will learn today? A model fitting method for edge detection RANSAC Local invariant
More informationImage warping and stitching
Image warping and stitching May 4 th, 2017 Yong Jae Lee UC Davis Last time Interactive segmentation Feature-based alignment 2D transformations Affine fit RANSAC 2 Alignment problem In alignment, we will
More informationRecap. DoF Constraint Solver. translation. affine. homography. 3D rotation
Image Blending Recap DoF Constraint Solver translation affine homography 3D rotation Recap DoF Constraint Solver translation 2 affine homography 3D rotation Recap DoF Constraint Solver translation 2 affine
More informationFeature Detection. Raul Queiroz Feitosa. 3/30/2017 Feature Detection 1
Feature Detection Raul Queiroz Feitosa 3/30/2017 Feature Detection 1 Objetive This chapter discusses the correspondence problem and presents approaches to solve it. 3/30/2017 Feature Detection 2 Outline
More informationOutline 7/2/201011/6/
Outline Pattern recognition in computer vision Background on the development of SIFT SIFT algorithm and some of its variations Computational considerations (SURF) Potential improvement Summary 01 2 Pattern
More informationImage warping and stitching
Image warping and stitching May 5 th, 2015 Yong Jae Lee UC Davis PS2 due next Friday Announcements 2 Last time Interactive segmentation Feature-based alignment 2D transformations Affine fit RANSAC 3 Alignment
More informationMidterm Wed. Local features: detection and description. Today. Last time. Local features: main components. Goal: interest operator repeatability
Midterm Wed. Local features: detection and description Monday March 7 Prof. UT Austin Covers material up until 3/1 Solutions to practice eam handed out today Bring a 8.5 11 sheet of notes if you want Review
More informationScott Smith Advanced Image Processing March 15, Speeded-Up Robust Features SURF
Scott Smith Advanced Image Processing March 15, 2011 Speeded-Up Robust Features SURF Overview Why SURF? How SURF works Feature detection Scale Space Rotational invariance Feature vectors SURF vs Sift Assumptions
More informationFeature Matching and RANSAC
Feature Matching and RANSAC Recognising Panoramas. [M. Brown and D. Lowe,ICCV 2003] [Brown, Szeliski, Winder, CVPR 2005] with a lot of slides stolen from Steve Seitz, Rick Szeliski, A. Efros Introduction
More informationHomographies and RANSAC
Homographies and RANSAC Computer vision 6.869 Bill Freeman and Antonio Torralba March 30, 2011 Homographies and RANSAC Homographies RANSAC Building panoramas Phototourism 2 Depth-based ambiguity of position
More informationHarder case. Image matching. Even harder case. Harder still? by Diva Sian. by swashford
Image matching Harder case by Diva Sian by Diva Sian by scgbt by swashford Even harder case Harder still? How the Afghan Girl was Identified by Her Iris Patterns Read the story NASA Mars Rover images Answer
More informationProblems with template matching
Problems with template matching The template represents the object as we expect to find it in the image The object can indeed be scaled or rotated This technique requires a separate template for each scale
More informationEE795: Computer Vision and Intelligent Systems
EE795: Computer Vision and Intelligent Systems Spring 2012 TTh 17:30-18:45 FDH 204 Lecture 10 130221 http://www.ee.unlv.edu/~b1morris/ecg795/ 2 Outline Review Canny Edge Detector Hough Transform Feature-Based
More informationScale Invariant Feature Transform
Scale Invariant Feature Transform Why do we care about matching features? Camera calibration Stereo Tracking/SFM Image moiaicing Object/activity Recognition Objection representation and recognition Image
More informationImage-based Modeling and Rendering: 8. Image Transformation and Panorama
Image-based Modeling and Rendering: 8. Image Transformation and Panorama I-Chen Lin, Assistant Professor Dept. of CS, National Chiao Tung Univ, Taiwan Outline Image transformation How to represent the
More informationEECS150 - Digital Design Lecture 14 FIFO 2 and SIFT. Recap and Outline
EECS150 - Digital Design Lecture 14 FIFO 2 and SIFT Oct. 15, 2013 Prof. Ronald Fearing Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley (slides courtesy of Prof. John Wawrzynek)
More informationChapter 3 Image Registration. Chapter 3 Image Registration
Chapter 3 Image Registration Distributed Algorithms for Introduction (1) Definition: Image Registration Input: 2 images of the same scene but taken from different perspectives Goal: Identify transformation
More informationHarder case. Image matching. Even harder case. Harder still? by Diva Sian. by swashford
Image matching Harder case by Diva Sian by Diva Sian by scgbt by swashford Even harder case Harder still? How the Afghan Girl was Identified by Her Iris Patterns Read the story NASA Mars Rover images Answer
More informationImage Features. Work on project 1. All is Vanity, by C. Allan Gilbert,
Image Features Work on project 1 All is Vanity, by C. Allan Gilbert, 1873-1929 Feature extrac*on: Corners and blobs c Mo*va*on: Automa*c panoramas Credit: Ma9 Brown Why extract features? Mo*va*on: panorama
More informationImage Warping and Mosacing
Image Warping and Mosacing 15-463: Rendering and Image Processing Alexei Efros with a lot of slides stolen from Steve Seitz and Rick Szeliski Today Mosacs Image Warping Homographies Programming Assignment
More informationSchool of Computing University of Utah
School of Computing University of Utah Presentation Outline 1 2 3 4 Main paper to be discussed David G. Lowe, Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints, IJCV, 2004. How to find useful keypoints?
More informationImage matching. Announcements. Harder case. Even harder case. Project 1 Out today Help session at the end of class. by Diva Sian.
Announcements Project 1 Out today Help session at the end of class Image matching by Diva Sian by swashford Harder case Even harder case How the Afghan Girl was Identified by Her Iris Patterns Read the
More informationMore Mosaic Madness. CS194: Image Manipulation & Computational Photography. Steve Seitz and Rick Szeliski. Jeffrey Martin (jeffrey-martin.
More Mosaic Madness Jeffrey Martin (jeffrey-martin.com) CS194: Image Manipulation & Computational Photography with a lot of slides stolen from Alexei Efros, UC Berkeley, Fall 2018 Steve Seitz and Rick
More informationCAP 5415 Computer Vision Fall 2012
CAP 5415 Computer Vision Fall 01 Dr. Mubarak Shah Univ. of Central Florida Office 47-F HEC Lecture-5 SIFT: David Lowe, UBC SIFT - Key Point Extraction Stands for scale invariant feature transform Patented
More informationImage warping and stitching
Image warping and stitching Thurs Oct 15 Last time Feature-based alignment 2D transformations Affine fit RANSAC 1 Robust feature-based alignment Extract features Compute putative matches Loop: Hypothesize
More informationKeypoint detection. (image registration, panorama stitching, motion estimation + tracking, recognition )
Keypoint detection n n Many applications benefit from features localized in (x,y) (image registration, panorama stitching, motion estimation + tracking, recognition ) Edges well localized only in one direction
More informationImage stitching. Digital Visual Effects Yung-Yu Chuang. with slides by Richard Szeliski, Steve Seitz, Matthew Brown and Vaclav Hlavac
Image stitching Digital Visual Effects Yung-Yu Chuang with slides by Richard Szeliski, Steve Seitz, Matthew Brown and Vaclav Hlavac Image stitching Stitching = alignment + blending geometrical registration
More informationMultimedia Retrieval Ch 5 Image Processing. Anne Ylinen
Multimedia Retrieval Ch 5 Image Processing Anne Ylinen Agenda Types of image processing Application areas Image analysis Image features Types of Image Processing Image Acquisition Camera Scanners X-ray
More informationCS5670: Computer Vision
CS5670: Computer Vision Noah Snavely Lecture 4: Harris corner detection Szeliski: 4.1 Reading Announcements Project 1 (Hybrid Images) code due next Wednesday, Feb 14, by 11:59pm Artifacts due Friday, Feb
More informationObtaining Feature Correspondences
Obtaining Feature Correspondences Neill Campbell May 9, 2008 A state-of-the-art system for finding objects in images has recently been developed by David Lowe. The algorithm is termed the Scale-Invariant
More informationLocal Image Features
Local Image Features Computer Vision CS 143, Brown Read Szeliski 4.1 James Hays Acknowledgment: Many slides from Derek Hoiem and Grauman&Leibe 2008 AAAI Tutorial This section: correspondence and alignment
More informationCS4670: Computer Vision
CS4670: Computer Vision Noah Snavely Lecture 6: Feature matching and alignment Szeliski: Chapter 6.1 Reading Last time: Corners and blobs Scale-space blob detector: Example Feature descriptors We know
More informationKey properties of local features
Key properties of local features Locality, robust against occlusions Must be highly distinctive, a good feature should allow for correct object identification with low probability of mismatch Easy to etract
More informationBlending and Compositing
09/26/17 Blending and Compositing Computational Photography Derek Hoiem, University of Illinois hybridimage.m pyramids.m Project 1: issues Basic tips Display/save Laplacian images using mat2gray or imagesc
More informationCS 558: Computer Vision 4 th Set of Notes
1 CS 558: Computer Vision 4 th Set of Notes Instructor: Philippos Mordohai Webpage: www.cs.stevens.edu/~mordohai E-mail: Philippos.Mordohai@stevens.edu Office: Lieb 215 Overview Keypoint matching Hessian
More informationCS6670: Computer Vision
CS6670: Computer Vision Noah Snavely Lecture 7: Image Alignment and Panoramas What s inside your fridge? http://www.cs.washington.edu/education/courses/cse590ss/01wi/ Projection matrix intrinsics projection
More informationVisual Tracking (1) Tracking of Feature Points and Planar Rigid Objects
Intelligent Control Systems Visual Tracking (1) Tracking of Feature Points and Planar Rigid Objects Shingo Kagami Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University swk(at)ic.is.tohoku.ac.jp http://www.ic.is.tohoku.ac.jp/ja/swk/
More informationImage stitching. Announcements. Outline. Image stitching
Announcements Image stitching Project #1 was due yesterday. Project #2 handout will be available on the web later tomorrow. I will set up a webpage for artifact voting soon. Digital Visual Effects, Spring
More informationComputer Vision I. Announcements. Fourier Tansform. Efficient Implementation. Edge and Corner Detection. CSE252A Lecture 13.
Announcements Edge and Corner Detection HW3 assigned CSE252A Lecture 13 Efficient Implementation Both, the Box filter and the Gaussian filter are separable: First convolve each row of input image I with
More informationComputer Vision I. Announcement. Corners. Edges. Numerical Derivatives f(x) Edge and Corner Detection. CSE252A Lecture 11
Announcement Edge and Corner Detection Slides are posted HW due Friday CSE5A Lecture 11 Edges Corners Edge is Where Change Occurs: 1-D Change is measured by derivative in 1D Numerical Derivatives f(x)
More informationCSE 527: Introduction to Computer Vision
CSE 527: Introduction to Computer Vision Week 5 - Class 1: Matching, Stitching, Registration September 26th, 2017 ??? Recap Today Feature Matching Image Alignment Panoramas HW2! Feature Matches Feature
More informationCorner Detection. GV12/3072 Image Processing.
Corner Detection 1 Last Week 2 Outline Corners and point features Moravec operator Image structure tensor Harris corner detector Sub-pixel accuracy SUSAN FAST Example descriptor: SIFT 3 Point Features
More informationLecture 10 Detectors and descriptors
Lecture 10 Detectors and descriptors Properties of detectors Edge detectors Harris DoG Properties of detectors SIFT Shape context Silvio Savarese Lecture 10-26-Feb-14 From the 3D to 2D & vice versa P =
More informationAK Computer Vision Feature Point Detectors and Descriptors
AK Computer Vision Feature Point Detectors and Descriptors 1 Feature Point Detectors and Descriptors: Motivation 2 Step 1: Detect local features should be invariant to scale and rotation, or perspective
More informationImage stitching. Digital Visual Effects Yung-Yu Chuang. with slides by Richard Szeliski, Steve Seitz, Matthew Brown and Vaclav Hlavac
Image stitching Digital Visual Effects Yung-Yu Chuang with slides by Richard Szeliski, Steve Seitz, Matthew Brown and Vaclav Hlavac Image stitching Stitching = alignment + blending geometrical registration
More informationFeatures Points. Andrea Torsello DAIS Università Ca Foscari via Torino 155, Mestre (VE)
Features Points Andrea Torsello DAIS Università Ca Foscari via Torino 155, 30172 Mestre (VE) Finding Corners Edge detectors perform poorly at corners. Corners provide repeatable points for matching, so
More informationFeature descriptors. Alain Pagani Prof. Didier Stricker. Computer Vision: Object and People Tracking
Feature descriptors Alain Pagani Prof. Didier Stricker Computer Vision: Object and People Tracking 1 Overview Previous lectures: Feature extraction Today: Gradiant/edge Points (Kanade-Tomasi + Harris)
More informationFeature Detection and Matching
and Matching CS4243 Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Leow Wee Kheng Department of Computer Science School of Computing National University of Singapore Leow Wee Kheng (CS4243) Camera Models 1 /
More informationMotion illusion, rotating snakes
Motion illusion, rotating snakes Local features: main components 1) Detection: Find a set of distinctive key points. 2) Description: Extract feature descriptor around each interest point as vector. x 1
More informationIntroduction to Computer Vision. Week 3, Fall 2010 Instructor: Prof. Ko Nishino
Introduction to Computer Vision Week 3, Fall 2010 Instructor: Prof. Ko Nishino Last Week! Image Sensing " Our eyes: rods and cones " CCD, CMOS, Rolling Shutter " Sensing brightness and sensing color! Projective
More informationLecture 6: Finding Features (part 1/2)
Lecture 6: Finding Features (part 1/2) Dr. Juan Carlos Niebles Stanford AI Lab Professor Stanford Vision Lab 1 What we will learn today? Local invariant features MoOvaOon Requirements, invariances Keypoint
More informationCSE 252B: Computer Vision II
CSE 252B: Computer Vision II Lecturer: Serge Belongie Scribes: Jeremy Pollock and Neil Alldrin LECTURE 14 Robust Feature Matching 14.1. Introduction Last lecture we learned how to find interest points
More informationLocal Image Features
Local Image Features Computer Vision Read Szeliski 4.1 James Hays Acknowledgment: Many slides from Derek Hoiem and Grauman&Leibe 2008 AAAI Tutorial Flashed Face Distortion 2nd Place in the 8th Annual Best
More informationEE368 Project Report CD Cover Recognition Using Modified SIFT Algorithm
EE368 Project Report CD Cover Recognition Using Modified SIFT Algorithm Group 1: Mina A. Makar Stanford University mamakar@stanford.edu Abstract In this report, we investigate the application of the Scale-Invariant
More informationImage processing and features
Image processing and features Gabriele Bleser gabriele.bleser@dfki.de Thanks to Harald Wuest, Folker Wientapper and Marc Pollefeys Introduction Previous lectures: geometry Pose estimation Epipolar geometry
More informationLocal features and image matching May 8 th, 2018
Local features and image matcing May 8 t, 2018 Yong Jae Lee UC Davis Last time RANSAC for robust fitting Lines, translation Image mosaics Fitting a 2D transformation Homograpy 2 Today Mosaics recap: How
More informationFinal Exam Study Guide CSE/EE 486 Fall 2007
Final Exam Study Guide CSE/EE 486 Fall 2007 Lecture 2 Intensity Sufaces and Gradients Image visualized as surface. Terrain concepts. Gradient of functions in 1D and 2D Numerical derivatives. Taylor series.
More informationComputer Vision. Exercise 3 Panorama Stitching 09/12/2013. Compute Vision : Exercise 3 Panorama Stitching
Computer Vision Exercise 3 Panorama Stitching 09/12/2013 Compute Vision : Exercise 3 Panorama Stitching The task Compute Vision : Exercise 3 Panorama Stitching 09/12/2013 2 Pipeline Compute Vision : Exercise
More informationFeature-based methods for image matching
Feature-based methods for image matching Bag of Visual Words approach Feature descriptors SIFT descriptor SURF descriptor Geometric consistency check Vocabulary tree Digital Image Processing: Bernd Girod,
More informationFeature Matching and Robust Fitting
Feature Matching and Robust Fitting Computer Vision CS 143, Brown Read Szeliski 4.1 James Hays Acknowledgment: Many slides from Derek Hoiem and Grauman&Leibe 2008 AAAI Tutorial Project 2 questions? This
More informationIntroduction to Image Processing and Computer Vision. -- Panoramas and Blending --
Introduction to Image Processing and Computer Vision -- Panoramas and Blending -- Winter 2013/14 Ivo Ihrke Panoramas Mosaics and Panoramas - Outline - Perspective Panoramas - Hardware-Based - Software-Based
More informationSUMMARY: DISTINCTIVE IMAGE FEATURES FROM SCALE- INVARIANT KEYPOINTS
SUMMARY: DISTINCTIVE IMAGE FEATURES FROM SCALE- INVARIANT KEYPOINTS Cognitive Robotics Original: David G. Lowe, 004 Summary: Coen van Leeuwen, s1460919 Abstract: This article presents a method to extract
More informationE27 Computer Vision - Final Project: Creating Panoramas David Nahmias, Dan Spagnolo, Vincent Stigliani Professor Zucker Due 5/10/13
E27 Computer Vision - Final Project: Creating Panoramas David Nahmias, Dan Spagnolo, Vincent Stigliani Professor Zucker Due 5/10/13 Sources Brown, M.; Lowe, D.G., "Recognising panoramas," Computer Vision,
More informationFeature descriptors and matching
Feature descriptors and matching Detections at multiple scales Invariance of MOPS Intensity Scale Rotation Color and Lighting Out-of-plane rotation Out-of-plane rotation Better representation than color:
More informationImplementation and Comparison of Feature Detection Methods in Image Mosaicing
IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering (IOSR-JECE) e-issn: 2278-2834,p-ISSN: 2278-8735 PP 07-11 www.iosrjournals.org Implementation and Comparison of Feature Detection Methods in Image
More information