HECRAS 2D: Are you ready for the revolution in the world of hydraulic modeling?

Transcription

1 HECRAS 2D: Are you ready for the revolution in the world of hydraulic modeling? Rishab Mahajan, Emily Campbell and Matt Bardol March 8, 2017

2 Outline Reasons for hydraulic modeling 1D Modeling 2D Modeling- HECRAS Building a 2D HECRAS model Case Study Dam Breach analysis

3 Reasons for hydraulic modeling Floodplain Mapping Flood Insurance Rates Design Mitigation Measures Dam Breach Studies Emergency Action Plans Dam Safety Permits Plan for evacuations About 100,000 cubic feet per second flowing over Oroville Dam Spillway Image Source : NY Times Extreme Events are on the rise!!

4 Before Numerical Modeling

5 Numerical Models Solves equations to simulate floodplain inundation Continuity Equation Momentum Equation Dimensionality - 1D, 2D or 3D Several modeling software - FEMA approved list HEC-RAS is most widely used tool Developed by US Army Corps of Engineers Public domain and free!! FEMA approved Previously limited to 1 dimension

6 2D M1Dodeling 1D Modeling

7 1D Modeling with HECRAS Cross-sections in one direction Hydraulic variables computed in one direction Step Backwater Method to calculate water surface profile Steady/ Unsteady state

8 Floodplain inundation mapping - 1D Simulate Water Surface Elevations (WSE) at each cross-sections Export WSEs to external mapping software Typically HEC-GeoRAS in ArcGIS Interpolate Water Surface Elevations between cross-sections Lay WSE over terrain surface to generate floodplain inundation Source : Federal Guidelines for Inundation Mapping of Flood Risks Associated with Dam Incidents and Failures (FEMA P-946)

9 1D HEC-RAS disadvantages Flow assumed perpendicular to cross-section Laying out cross-sections requires a lot of engineering judgment Difficult to represent Split flows Variability in floodplain area Loss in resolution of terrain data cross section spacing Need to orient cross-section perpendicular to flow

10 Where 1D does not work adequately? Significant meanders or poorly defined channel? Shallow Overland Flows Low flow condition Split flow conditions Limiting in case of lateral expansion/contractions of channels White River, Washington Source : Wikipedia

11 2D Modeling

12 2D Modeling Simulates variability across and along the flow path Floodplain discretized into grid cells Can utilize detailed terrain data with less loss in resolution Previously limited application Cost (commercial software) Agency Acceptance Lack of familiarity Run Time

13 The Revolution has begun Possible alternative to many free and commercial 2D hydraulic models HECRAS 2D has been validated extensively Can update old 1D HEC- RAS models with 2D areas Need to understand framework and assumptions behind HECRAS 2D

14 HEC-RAS 2D - Capabilities 1D, 2D, and combined 1D and 2D modeling Implicit Finite Volume algorithm High resolution sub-grid model Large cells still retain terrain details Detailed floodplain mapping and animations RAS Mapper Ability to use multiple cores Cloud Computing

15 Computational Methods Equations Solved Diffusion Wave Faster but less accurate in some cases Full Momentum Slower but more accurate Full Momentum (Full St. Venant) vs Diffusion Wave: Use Diffusion Wave to develop model, then try Full Momentum If significant differences exist, trust Full Momentum Full Momentum recommended for: Dynamic flood waves (e.g. dam breaches) Sudden expansions and contractions Wave propagation analysis Super elevation around bends Multiple hydraulic structures (bridges, bridge piers etc.)

16 Computational Mesh Unstructured or structured computational mesh (up to 8 sides) Orient cells along terrain and flow barriers using break lines Manual editing of cells Optimum cell size Water surface slope changes rapidly smaller cell size Tradeoff between run time and model stability

17 Model Stability Model instability due to solution not meeting numerical tolerances Use optimum time step based on Courant Number (V*delta T) / delta X <=1 Specify initial conditions created using lower flows Use ramp up inflow hydrographs Adjust 2D computation options and tolerances Theta ( ) Theta Warm-up ( ) Water Surface Tolerance (ft) Volume Tolerance (ft) Maximum Number of Iterations

18 Building a HEC-RAS 2D Model

19 Dam Breach Analysis: How would you model this? buildings road multi-sided impoundment road buildings

20 2D Model Setup Elevation Pre-Processing Lidar (Terrain) Floodplain Bathymetry Channel Land Cover Input Mesh Development Boundary Conditions Calculation of Table Properties Model is only as good as the (terrain) data! Very important to have good terrain (DEM) data. Terrain data usually does not include bathymetry. For flood plain studies, not a big problem. For channel flow analysis, bathymetry is very important to get details in river.

21 Elevation Data Pre-Processing Remove redundant data points Produce a bare earth terrain by removing from Lidar Bridge decks Vegetation Trees Overwater passes Superimpose channel bathymetry data Can be done in RAS Mapper/ GIS Source : HECRAS User Manual

22 Elevation Data Pre-Processing Creating a terrain model

23 Land Cover Input Build in GIS import with RAS Mapper (.shp)

24 Mesh Development

25 Boundary Conditions

26 Calculation of Hydraulic Properties RAS uses all the input data to compute hydraulic properties of all cells and cell faces Elevation- Volume relationship created for each cell using the underlying terrain Elevation versus area, wetted perimeter, roughness calculated for each cell face

27 Running a 2D HEC-RAS Running the model Model stability

28 Post Processing Results are viewed in RAS Mapper Animation Note: When checked value is PINK, you can view individual values, min/ max, press play

29 Post Processing Results cab be exported to raster and GIS can take it from there

30 Case study : 1D Vs 2D- Dam Breach

31 Dam Breach Simulation Case Study Dam Breach Analysis Crest length 5200 ft Height - 23 feet, Maximum impoundment area of 10,000 acre-feet Simulated a piping failure for the dam- Sunny Day Peak flow of 17,000 cfs for breach hydrograph

32 1D Model 202 Cross Sections Spaced approx. 800 ft. apart

33 300*300 ft grid cells

34 Results 1D Output results look just as fancy, however 2D More backwater effects and larger depths in 2D case 2D shows more floodplain inundated

35 1D, 1D+2D or pure-2d?! When should you go. Pure 2D: Flow expected to spill into floodplain Alluvial fans and estuaries Meanders and loops Cool hydrodynamic animations! Access to good terrain data Pure 1D: Mostly uni-directional flow within channel Minimum lateral expansion Run time is a constraint Need to extract a lot of data (velocity, Froude #, shear, normal depth, critical depth etc.) Limited/low quality terrain data 1D+2D, when you need both 2D and 1D features Source: HEC-RAS 2D Modeling User s Manual

36 THANK YOU Rishab Mahajan Emily Campbell