A Few Remarks on Bounded Operators on Topological Vector Spaces
|
|
- Cecil Lionel Pitts
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Filomat 30:3 (2016), DOI /FIL Z Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: A Few Remarks on Bounded Operators on Topological Vector Spaces Omid Zabeti a, Ljubiša D.R. Kočinac b a Faculty of Mathematics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, P.O. Box , Zahedan, Iran b University of Niš, Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, Niš, Serbia Abstract. We give a few observations on different types of bounded operators on a topological vector space X and their relations with compact operators on X. In particular, we investigate when these bounded operators coincide with compact operators. We also consider similar types of bounded bilinear mappings between topological vector spaces. Some properties of tensor product operators between locally convex spaces are established. In the last part of the paper we deal with operators on topological Riesz spaces. 1. Introduction Throughout the paper, all topological vector spaces are over the scalar field K which is either the field R of real numbers or the field C of complex numbers. A neighborhood U of 0 in a topological vector space will be simply called a zero neighborhood. Let X be a topological vector space. A subset A of X is bounded if for each zero neighborhood U in X there is a scalar λ such that A λu. X is said to be locally bounded if there is a bounded neighborhood of 0 X. In the literature one can find two different notions of bounded operators. In [11, 13, 15] there is the definition which is a definition of nb-bounded operators below, while in [7] one can find the definition which is a definition of bb-bounded operators; the following terminology is from [16]. A linear operator T on X is said to be: nb-bounded if there exists a zero neighborhood U X such that T(U) is a bounded subset of X; bb-bounded if T mappings bounded sets into bounded sets. The class of all nb-bounded operators on X is denoted by B n (X) and is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence on some zero neighborhood. A net (S α ) of nb-bounded operators is said to converge to zero uniformly on a zero neighborhood U X if for each zero neighborhood V, there is an α 0 with S α (U) V for each α α 0. The class of all bb-bounded operators on X is denoted by B b (X) and is endowed with the topology of uniform convergence on bounded sets. Note that a net (S α ) of bb-bounded operators converges to zero 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 46A32; Secondary 46A03, 46A40, 47B07, 47L05, 57N17 Keywords. Bounded operator, compact operator, central operator, order bounded below operator, bounded bilinear mapping, tensor product of locally convex spaces, Heine-Borel property, topological Riesz space, locally solid Riesz space Received: 12 August 2015; Revised: 20 October 2015; Accepted: 23 October 2015 Communicated by Ekrem Savaş addresses: o.zabeti@gmail.com (Omid Zabeti), lkocinac@gmail.com (Ljubiša D.R. Kočinac)
2 Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti / Filomat 30:3 (2016), uniformly on a bounded set B X if for each zero neighborhood V, there is an index α 0 with S α (B) V for all α α 0. Also, the class of all continuous operators on X is denoted by B c (X) and is assigned to the topology of equicontinuous convergence. A net(s α ) of continuous operators is convergent to the zero operator equicontinuously if for each zero neighborhood V X there exists a zero neighborhood U such that for every ε > 0 there is an α 0 with the property S α (U) εv for any α α 0. It is easy to see that B n (X) B c (X) B b (X). Also note that the above inclusions become equalities when X is locally bounded; see [16, 18] for more details concerning these operators. Recall that a topological vector space X has the Heine-Borel property if every closed and bounded subset of X is compact. By X Y, we mean the algebraic tensor product space. If X and Y are locally convex spaces, then the symbol X π Y will be used for the algebraic tensor product space endowed with the projective tensor product topology. For a review about projective tensor product of locally convex spaces and the related notions, we refer the reader to [15, Chapter III; 5, 6]; for a topological flavour of topological vector spaces and the relevant aspects, one may consult [13, Chapters I, II, III]. Note that the symbol co(a B) denotes the convex hull of A B. Some notions will be given in the course of exposition in the beginning of a section. The paper is organized in the following way. In Section 2 we further investigate bounded linear operators on topological vector spaces. In Section 3 we introduce bounded bilinear mappings between topological vector spaces and consider some their properties. Section 4 is devoted to a topological approach to the notions of central and order bounded below operators defined on a topological Riesz space. With an appropriate topology, we extend some known results for central and order bounded below operators on a Banach lattice, to the topological Riesz space setting. 2. Linear Mappings Let X be a normed space, K(X) be the space of all compact operators on X, and B(X) be the collection of all bounded linear operators. From the equality T(x) T x, it follows that X is a topological B(X)- module, where the module multiplication is given via the formula (T, x) T(x), for each linear operator T and each x X. On the other hand, it is known that K(X) is a closed subspace of B(X). It is also of interest to investigate situations in which K(X) and B(X) are the same. So, it is natural to see if these results can be generalized to ordinary topological vector spaces and to different classes of bounded and compact operators on them. In [16], two different notions for compact operators on a topological vector space have been introduced. A linear operator T on a topological vector space X is said to be: n-compact if there is a zero neighborhood U X for which T(U) is relatively compact (which means that its closure is compact); b-compact if for each bounded set B X, T(B) is relatively compact. We use the notations K n (X) and K b (X) for the set of all n-compact linear operators and the set of all b-compact linear operators on X, respectively. It is easy to see that K n (X) is a two-sided ideal of B n (X) and K b (X) is a right ideal of B b (X). In this section we investigate some relations between bounded linear operators and compact ones. For more details about bounded and compact operators on topological vector spaces and the related notions see [7, 15, 16, 18]. In [18], it has been proved that each class of bounded linear operators on a topological vector space X, with respect to the appropriate topology, forms a topological algebra. In this section we show that X is a topological A-module, where A is one of the topological algebras B n (X), B c (X), and B b (X), respectively, and
3 Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti / Filomat 30:3 (2016), the module multiplication is given via (T, x) T(x), for every linear operator T and every x X. Let us point out that a topological vector space X is a topological A-module, where A is a topological algebra over the same field, provided that the module multiplication is continuous as a mapping from A X, equipped with product topology, into X. Proposition 2.1. The module multiplication in B n (X) is continuous with respect to the topology of uniform convergence on some zero neighborhood. Proof. Let (x α ) be a net in X which is convergent to zero and (T α ) be a net in B n (X) converging to zero uniformly on some zero neighborhood U X. There is an α 0 such that x α U for each α α 0. If V is an arbitrary zero neighborhood in X, Then, there exists an index α 1 with T α (U) V for each α α 1, so that for sufficiently large α, we have T α (x α ) T α (U) V. Proposition 2.2. The module multiplication in B c (X) is continuous with respect to the equicontinuous convergence topology. Proof. Let (x α ) be a net in X which is convergent to zero and (T α ) be a net of continuous operators converging to zero equicontinuously. Suppose V is an arbitrary zero neighborhood in X. There exist a zero neighborhood U X and an index α 0 with T α (U) V for each α α 0. Choose an α 1 such that x α U for every α α 1. Thus, for sufficiently large α, we conclude T α (x α ) T α (U) V. Proposition 2.3. The module multiplication in B b (X) is sequentially continuous with respect to the topology of uniform convergence on bounded sets. Proof. Let (x n ) be a sequence in X which is convergent to zero and (T n ) be a sequence of bb-bounded operators converging to zero uniformly on bounded sets. Note that E = {x n : n N} is bounded in X. Suppose V is an arbitrary zero neighborhood in X. There exists an n 0 such that T n (E) V for any n > n 0, so that we have T n (x n ) T n (E) V. Question 2.4. Is the module multiplication in B b (X) continuous, in general? Note that for a normed space X, K(X) = B(X) if and only if X is finite dimensional. In this step, we consider some situations where a class of compact linear operators coincides with the corresponding class of bounded operators. Proposition 2.5. K b (X) = B b (X) if and only if X has the Heine-Borel property. Proof. K b (X) = B b (X) I K b (X) X has the Heine-Borel property, where I denotes the identity operator on X. Remark 2.6. Note that when X has the Heine-Borel property, then K n (X) = B n (X). Suppose, for a topological vector space X, K n (X) = B n (X). We consider two cases. First, assume X is locally bounded. Then, I B n (X) I K n (X) X is locally compact X is finite dimensional. The second case, when X is not locally bounded. Then, I B n (X) I K n (X) X is not locally compact X is infinite dimensional.
4 Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti / Filomat 30:3 (2016), Let (X n ) be a sequence of topological vector spaces in which, every X n has the Heine-Borel property. Put X = n=1 X n, with the product topology. It is known that X is a topological vector space. In the following, we establish that each X n has the Heine-Borel property if and only if so has X. Theorem 2.7. Let X = n=1 X n, with the product topology; then X has the Heine-Borel property if and only if each X n has this property, as well. Proof. First, assume that each X n has the Heine-Borel property. We claim that if B X is bounded, then there exist bounded subsets B i X i such that B i=1 B i. Put B i = {x X i : (y 1,..., y i 1, x, y i+1,...) B, y j X j }. Each B i is bounded in X i. Let W i be a zero neighborhood in X i and put W = X 1... X i 1 W i X i Since W is a zero neighborhood in X, there exists a positive scalar α such that B αw, so that B i αw i. Also, it is easy to see that B i=1 B i. Therefore, B B i = B i, i=1 i=1 so that we conclude B is also compact, i.e. that X has the Heine-Borel property. For the converse, suppose X has the Heine-Borel property. Choose a bounded set B n X n. Put B = {0}... {0} B n {0}.... It is an easy job to see that B is bounded in X, so that B is compact. By using Tychonoff s theorem, we conclude that B n is compact and this would complete our claim. Collecting results of Theorem 3.5, Proposition 2.5, and Remark 2.6, we have the following. Corollary 2.8. Let (X n ) be a sequence of topological vector spaces, in which, each X n has the Heine-Borel property. Put X = n=1 X n, with the product topology. Then, K b (X) = B b (X) and K n (X) = B n (X). Remark 2.9. Note that when X has the Heine-Borel property, K n (X) need not be equal to K b (X). For example, consider the identity operator on R N. Indeed, it is b-compact but it fails to be n-compact; nevertheless, X has the Heine-Borel property. Compact operators are not closed in the topologies induced by the corresponding class of bounded linear operators. To see this, consider the following examples. Example K n (X) is not a closed subspace of B n (X), in general. Let X be c 00, the space of all real null sequences, with the uniform norm topology. Suppose that T n is the linear operator defined by T n (x 1, x 2,..., x n,...) = (x 1, 1 2 x 2,..., 1 n x n, 0,...). It is easy to see that each T n is n-compact. Also, (T n ) converges uniformly on N (0), the open unit ball of X 1 with center zero, to the linear operator T defined by T(x 1, x 2,...) = (x 1, 1 2 x 2,...). For, if ε > 0 is arbitrary, there is an n 0 N such that 1 n 0 < ε. So, for each n > n 0, (T n T)(N (0) 1 ) N(0) ε. Now, it is not difficult to see that T is nb-bounded but it is not an n-compact linear operator. Example K b (X) fails to be closed in B b (X), in general. Let X be c 0, the space of all vanishing sequences, with the coordinate-wise topology. Let P n be the projection on the first n-components. By using the Tychonoff s theorem, we can conclude that for each n N, P n is b-compact. Also, (P n ) converges uniformly on bounded sets to the identity operator I. We show that I is not b-compact. Suppose that B is the sequence (a n ) defined by a n = (1, 1,..., 1, 0, 0,...) in which 1 is appeared n times. B is a Cauchy sequence in c 0, so that it is bounded. Also note that B = B. Now, if I K b (c 0 ), then B should be compact. Since B is not complete, this is impossible.
5 Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti / Filomat 30:3 (2016), Bilinear Mappings The notion of a jointly continuous bilinear mapping between topological vector spaces has been studied widely, for example, see [13 15] for more information. In particular, when we deal with the normed spaces framework, these mappings carry bounded sets (with respect to the product topology) to bounded sets. On the other hand, tensor products are a fruitful and handy tool in converting a bilinear mapping to a linear operator in any setting; for example, the projective tensor product for normed spaces and the Fremlin projective tensor products for vector lattices and Banach lattices (see [8, 9] for ample information). In a topological vector space setting, we can consider two different non-equivalent ways to define a bounded bilinear mapping. It turns out that these aspects of boundedness are in a sense intermediate notions of a jointly continuous one. On the other hand, different types of bounded linear operators between topological vector spaces and some of their properties have been investigated (see [16, 18]). In this section, by using the concept of projective tensor product between locally convex spaces, we show that, in a sense, different notions of a bounded bilinear mapping coincide with different aspects of a bounded operator. We prove that for two bounded linear operators, the tensor product operator also has the same boundedness property, as well. Definition 3.1. Let X, Y, and Z be topological vector spaces. A bilinear mapping σ : X Y Z is said to be: (i) n-bounded if there exist some zero neighborhoods U X and V Y such that σ(u V) is bounded in Z; (ii) b-bounded if for any bounded sets B 1 X and B 2 Y, σ(b 1 B 2 ) is bounded in Z. We first show that these concepts of bounded bilinear mappings are not equivalent. Example 3.2. Let X = R N be the space of all real sequences with the Tychonoff product topology. Consider the bilinear mapping σ : X X X defined by σ(x, y) = xy where x = (x i ), y = (y i ) and the product is pointwise. It is easily verified that σ is b-bounded; but since X is not locally bounded, it can not be an n-bounded bilinear mapping. It is not difficult to see that every n-bounded bilinear mapping is jointly continuous and every jointly continuous bilinear mapping is b-bounded, so that these concepts of bounded bilinear mappings are related to jointly continuous bilinear mappings. Note that a b-bounded bilinear mapping need not be jointly continuous, even separately continuous; by a separately continuous bilinear mapping, we mean one which is continuous in each of its components. Consider the following example (which is actually originally an exercise from [13, Chapter I, Exercise 13]; we will give a proof for it for the sake of completeness). Example 3.3. Let X be the space C[0, 1], consisting of all real continuous functions on [0, 1]. Suppose τ 1 is the topology generated by the seminorms p x ( f ) = f (x), for each x [0, 1], and τ 2 is the topology induced by the metric defined via the formulae d( f, ) = 1 0 f (x) (x) 1 + f (x) (x) dx. Consider the bilinear mapping σ : (X, τ 1 ) (X, τ 1 ) (X, τ 2 ) defined by σ( f, ) = f. It is easy to show that σ is a b-bounded bilinear mapping. But is it not even separately continuous; for example the mapping = 1 X, the identity operator from (X, τ 1 ) into (X, τ 2 ), is not continuous. To see this, suppose V = { f X : d( f, 0) < 1 2 }. V is a zero neighborhood in (X, τ 2 ). If the identity operator is continuous, there should be a zero neighborhood U (X, τ 1 ) with U V. Therefore, there are {x 1,..., x n } in [0, 1] and ε > 0 such that U = { f X, f (x i ) < ε, i = 1,..., n}.
6 Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti / Filomat 30:3 (2016), For each subinterval [x i, x i+1 ], consider positive reals α i and α i+1 such that x i < α i < α i+1 < x i+1. For an n N, Define, n(x x i ) α i x i, if x i x α i, f i (x) = n, if α i x α i+1, n(x x i+1 ) α i+1 x i+1, if α i+1 x x i+1. Now consider the continuous function f on [0, 1] defined by f i s. Obviously, f U. Put β = n i=1 (α i+1 α i ). We can choose n N and β in such a way that βn n+1 > 1 2. Thus, 1 0 f (x) βn dx > 1 + f (x) n + 1 > 1 2. This completes the claim. In what follows, by using the concept of the projective tensor product of locally convex spaces, we are going to show that these concepts of bounded bilinear mappings are, in fact, the different types of bounded operators defined on a locally convex topological vector space. Recall that if U and V are zero neighborhoods for locally convex spaces X and Y, respectively, then co(u V) is a typical zero neighborhood for the locally convex space X π Y. Proposition 3.4. Let X, Y and Z be locally convex vector spaces and θ : X Y X π Y be the canonical bilinear mapping. If ϕ : X Y Z is an n-bounded bilinear mapping, there exists an nb-bounded operator T : X π Y Z such that T θ = ϕ. Proof. By [15, III.6.1], there is a linear mapping T : X π Y Z such that T θ = ϕ. Therefore, it is enough to show that T is nb-bounded. Since ϕ is n-bounded, there are zero neighborhoods U X and V Y such that ϕ(u V) is bounded in Z. Let W be an arbitrary zero neighborhood in Z. There is r > 0 with ϕ(u V) rw. It is not hard to show that T(U V) rw, so that T(co(U V)) rw. But, by the fact mentioned before this proposition, co(u V) is a zero neighborhood in the space X π Y. This completes the proof. Proposition 3.5. Let X, Y and Z be locally convex vector spaces and θ : X Y X π Y be the canonical bilinear mapping. If ϕ : X Y Z is a b-bounded bilinear mapping, there exists a bb-bounded operator T : X π Y Z such that T θ = ϕ. Proof. As in the proof of the previous theorem, the existence of the linear mapping T : X π Y Z such that T θ = ϕ follows by [15, III.6.1]. We prove that the linear mapping T is bb-bounded. Consider a bounded set B X π Y. There exist bounded sets B 1 X and B 2 Y such that B B 1 B 2. To see this, put B 1 = {x X, y Y, such that x y B}, B 2 = {y Y, x X, such that x y B}. It is not difficult to see that B 1 and B 2 are bounded in X and Y, respectively, and B B 1 B 2. Also, since θ is jointly continuous, B 1 B 2 is also bounded in X π Y. Thus, from the inclusion T(B) T(B 1 B 2 ) = T θ(b 1 B 2 ) = ϕ(b 1 B 2 ) and using the fact that ϕ is a b-bounded bilinear mapping, it follows that T is a bb-bounded linear operator. This concludes the claim and completes the proof of the proposition. Remark 3.6. Note that the similar result for jointly continuous bilinear mappings between locally convex spaces is known and commonly can be found in the contexts concerning topological vector spaces (see for example [15, III.6]).
7 Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti / Filomat 30:3 (2016), We are going now to investigate whether or not the tensor product of two operators preserves different kinds of bounded operators between topological vector spaces. The response is affirmative. Recall that for vector spaces X, Y, Z, and W, and linear operators T : X Y, S : Z W, by the tensor product of T and S, we mean the unique linear operator T S : X Z Y W defined via the formulae (T S)(x z) = T(x) S(z); one may consult [14] for a comprehensive study regarding the tensor product operators. Theorem 3.7. Let X, Y, Z, and W be locally convex spaces, and T : X Y and S : Z W be nb-bounded linear operators. Then the tensor product operator T S : X π Z Y π W is nb-bounded. Proof. Let U X and V Z be two zero neighborhoods such that T(U) and S(V) are bounded subsets of Y and W, respectively. Let O 1 Y and O 2 W be two arbitrary zero neighborhoods. There exist positive reals α and β with T(U) αo 1 and S(V) βo 2. Then (T S)(U V) = T(U) S(V) αβ(o 1 O 2 ) αβco(o 1 O 2 ), so that (T S)(co(U V)) αβco(o 1 O 2 ). This is the desired result. Theorem 3.8. Suppose X, Y, Z, and W are locally convex spaces, and T : X Y and S : Z W are bb-bounded linear operators. Then the tensor product operator T S : X π Z Y π W is also bb-bounded. Proof. Fix a bounded set B X π Z. By the argument used in Proposition 3.5, there are bounded sets B 1 X and B 2 Z with B B 1 B 2. Let O 1 Y and O 2 W be two arbitrary zero neighborhoods. There are positive reals α and β such that T(B 1 ) αo 1 and S(B 2 ) βo 2. Therefore, (T S)(B) (T S)(B 1 B 2 ) = T(B 1 ) S(B 2 ) αβ(o 1 O 2 ) αβco(o 1 O 2 ), hence (T S)(B) αβco(o 1 O 2 ), as required. Theorem 3.9. Suppose X, Y, Z, and W are locally convex spaces, and T : X Y and S : Z W are continuous linear operators. Then the tensor product operator T S : X π Z Y π W is jointly continuous. Proof. Let O 1 Y and O 2 Z be two arbitrary zero neighborhoods. There exist zero neighborhoods U X and V Z such that T(U) O 1 and S(V) O 2. It follows (T S)(U V) = T(U) S(V) (O 1 O 2 ) co(o 1 O 2 ), so that (T S)(co(U V)) co(o 1 O 2 ), as claimed. 4. Operators in Topological Riesz Spaces In this section we give a topological approach to the notions of central operators and order bounded below operators defined on a topological Riesz space. With an appropriate topology, we extend to topological Riesz spaces some known results for these operators on Banach lattices. We recall some concepts and terminology. A Riesz space (or vector lattice) is an ordered real vector space X which is also a lattice. For x X one defines x + = x 0 (the positive part of x), x = ( x) 0 (the negative part of x), and x = x ( x) = x + + x (the absolute value or modulus of x). A subset S of a Riesz space X is said to be solid if y S, x X, and x y imply x S. A topological Riesz space is a Riesz space which is at the same time a (ordered) topological vector space. By a locally solid Riesz space we mean a topological Riesz space with a locally solid topology. A Banach lattice is a Riesz space which is also a Banach space, where the norm is a lattice norm. For more information on topological Riesz spaces and related notions, and also for terminology used in this section, we refer the reader to [1 4, 10].
8 Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti / Filomat 30:3 (2016), Central operators We recall that a linear operator T on a Riesz space X is called central if there exists a positive real number γ such that for each x X, we have T(x) γ x (see [5, 6, 17], where there are also interesting results concerning this class of operators). In [17], Wickstead showed that if X is a Banach lattice, then Z(X), the space of all central operators on X (called the center of X), is a unital Banach algebra with respect to the norm given by T = inf{λ 0 : T λi}, for each T Z(X), where I denotes the identity operator on X. We are going to generalize this result to central operators on a locally solid Riesz space X endowed with the τ-topology: a net (T α ) of central operators converges to zero in the τ-topology if for each ε > 0 there is an α 0 such that T α (x) ε x, for each α α 0 and for each x X. It is easy to see that Z(X) is a unital algebra. We show that Z(X) is in fact a topological algebra. Proposition 4.1. The operations of addition, scalar multiplication and product are continuous in Z(X) with respect to the τ-topology. Proof. Suppose (T α ) and (S α ) are two nets of central operators which are convergent to zero in the τ-topology. Let ε > 0 be given. There are indices α 0 and α 1 such that T α (x) ε 2 x for each α α 0 and x X, and S α (x) ε 2 x for each α α 1 and x X. Choose α 2 with α 2 α 0 and α 2 α 1. Then for each α α 2 and for each x X, we have, (T α + S α )(x) T α (x) + S α (x) ε x. Now, we show the continuity of the scalar multiplication. Suppose (γ α ) is a net of reals which converges to zero. Without loss of generality, we may assume that γ α 1 for each α. Therefore, for each x X we have γ α T α (x) γ α ε x ε x, for all α α 0. For continuity of the product, we have for x X T α (S α (x)) T α S α (x) T α (ε x ) = T α (ε x ) ε 2 x, so that T α (S α (x)) ε 2 x. Note that by [5, 6], for a central operator T on a vector lattice X, the modulus of T, T, exists and satisfies T ( x ) = T(x), for any x X. Proposition 4.2. Suppose (T α ) is a net of central operators on a topological Riesz space X converging (in the τ-topology) to a linear operator T. Then, T is also central. Proof. There is an α 0 such that for each α α 0 and for each x X, we have (T α T)(x) x. Fix an α α 0. There exists a positive real γ α such that T α (x) γ α x. So, we have T(x) T α (x) + x γ α x + x = (γ α + 1) x. Therefore, T is also a central operator. Proposition 4.3. Let X be a complete locally solid Riesz space. τ-topology. Then Z(X) is also complete with respect to the Proof. Let (T α ) be a Cauchy net in Z(X) and V be an arbitrary zero neighborhood in X. Fix x 0 X. Choose δ > 0 such that δ x 0 V. There exists an α 0 such that (T α T β )(x) δ x for each α α 0 and for each β α 0. So, we conclude that (T α T β )(x 0 ) V. This means that (T α (x 0 )) is a Cauchy net in X. Therefore, it is convergent. Put T(x) = lim T α (x). Since this convergence holds in Z(X), by Proposition 4.2, T is also central.
9 Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti / Filomat 30:3 (2016), Collecting the results of Propositions 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3, we have the following Theorem 4.4. Let X be a complete locally solid Riesz space. Then, Z(X) is a complete unital topological algebra. In addition, we have continuity of the lattice operations (defined via formulas of [5, 6]) with respect to the assumed topology, which is proved in the following theorem; in other words (Z(X), τ) is a locally solid Riesz space. Theorem 4.5. The lattice operations of Z(X) are continuous with respect to the assumed topology. Proof. By [5, 6], the supremum and the infimum operations in Z(X) are given by the formulas (T S)(x) = T(x) S(x) and (T S)(x) = T(x) S(x), T, S Z(X), x X +. Let (T α ) and (S α ) be two nets of central operators which are convergent to operators T and S in the τ- topology, respectively. Let ε > 0 be arbitrary. There are some α 0 and α 1 such that for each x X, we have (T α T)(x) ε 2 x for each α α 0 and (S α S)(x) ε 2 x for each α α 1. Pick an α 2 with α 2 α 0 and α 2 α 1. Then for each α α 2, by using the Birkhoff s inequality (for example, see [3]), for each x X + = {y X : y 0}, (T α S α )(x) (T S)(x) = (T α S α )(x) (T α S)(x) + (T α S)(x) (T S)(x) T α (x) S α (x) T α (x) S(x) + T α (x) S(x) T(x) S(x) (T α T)(x) + (S α S)(x) εx. If x is not positive, by using x = x + x, we get (T α S α )(x) (T S)(x) 2ε x for sufficiently large α. Since, the lattice operations in a Riesz space can be obtained via each other, we conclude that all of them are continuous in Z(X) with respect to the τ-topology Order bounded below operators In this subsection we present a new approach to order bounded below operators on a topological Riesz space. The concept of a bounded below operator on a Banach space has been studied widely (for example, see Section 2.1 in [1]), and the norm of the operator was used essentially in its definition. In a Riesz space we have the concepts order and modulus which help us to have a different vision to these operators. On the other hand, when we deal with a topological Riesz space and an operator on it, the concept neighborhoods enables us to consider a topological view for an order bounded below operator. With the topology introduced in the previous subsection we extend some results of [1, Section 2.1] to topological Riesz spaces. A linear operator T on a topological Riesz space X is said to be order bounded below if T(x) γ x for some positive real number γ and each x X. The class of all order bounded below operators on a topological Riesz space X is denoted by O(X). We consider the τ-topology on it. It is easy to see that every order bounded below operator is one-to-one; also, every central order bounded below operator on a locally solid Riesz space has a closed range. In the following lemma we show that if a linear operator is sufficiently close to an order bounded below operator with respect to the τ-topology, then it is also order bounded below. So, the set of all central operators on a topological Riesz space X which are also order bounded below is an open subset of Z(X). Lemma 4.6. If a linear operator S on a topological Riesz space X is sufficiently close to an order bounded below operator T with respect to the τ-topology, then S is also order bounded below.
10 Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti / Filomat 30:3 (2016), Proof. Since T is an order bounded below operator on X there is a positive real number γ such that T(x) γ x for each x X. Choose a linear operator S such that (T S)(x) γ 2 x. Then, for each x X, we have Sx = (S T)(x) + T(x) γ x γ 2 x = γ 2 x, so that S(x) γ 2 x, which completes the proof. Now, we assert the main theorem of this subsection which is an extension of Theorem 2.9 from [1] to a locally solid Riesz space. Theorem 4.7. Let X be a complete locally solid Riesz space and T a continuous order bounded below operator on X. If a net (T α ) of surjective operators converges in the τ-topology to T, then T is also surjective. Proof. Fix a constant γ > 0 such that T(x) 2γ x for each x X. There is an α 0 with (T α T)(x) γ x for each x X and for each α α 0, so that T α (x) γ x. Pick y X. To show that T is surjective, we have to show that there exists x X such that T(x) = y. There is a net {x α } in X such that T α (x α ) = y. From γ x α T α (x α ) = y, it follows that x α 1 γ y. We claim that {x α } is a Cauchy net in X. Let V be an arbitrary zero neighborhood in X. Choose δ > 0 such that δ 1 γ y V. Then for sufficiently large α and β we have 2γ x α x β T(x α ) T(x β ) T(x α ) y + y T(x β ) = T(x α ) T α (x α ) + T β (x β ) T(x β ) δ 2 x α + δ 2 x β δ 1 γ y. So, we conclude that {x α } is really a Cauchy net in X. Suppose that (x α ) converges to x. Thus, it follows that (T(x α )) converges to T(x). On the other hand, from the equality T(x α ) y = T(x α ) T α (x α ) δ x α δ 1 γ y it follows that (T(x α )) converges to y X, hence T(x) = y. This complete the proof. References [1] Y.A. Abramovich, C.D. Aliprantis, An Invitation to Operator Theory, Graduate Studies in Mathematics 50, American Mathematical Society, [2] Y.A. Abramovich, C.D. Aliprantis, I.A. Polyrakis, Some remarks on surjective and bounded below operators, Atti Sem. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena 44 (1996) [3] C.D. Aliprantis, O. Birkinshaw, Locally Solid Riesz Spaces, Academic Press, New York and London, [4] C.D. Aliprantis, O. Birkinshaw, Positive Operators, Academic Press, New York and London, [5] A. Bigard, K. Keimel, Sur les endomorphismes conversant les polaires d un group réticuléàrchimédien, Boll. Soc. Math. France 97 (1969) [6] P.F. Conard, J.E. Diem, The ring of polar preserving endomorphisms of an Abelian lattice-ordered group, Illinois J. Math. 15 (1971) [7] R.E. Edwards, Functional Analysis. Theory and Applications (Corrected reprint of the 1965 original), Dover Publications, Inc., New York, [8] D.H. Fremlin, Tensor products of Archimedean vector lattices, Amer. J. Math. 94 (1972) [9] D.H. Fremlin, Tensor products of Banach lattices, Math. Ann. 211 (1974) [10] D.H. Fremlin, Topological Riesz Spaces and Measure Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2008 (digitally printed version of the 1974 edition). [11] J. Kelly, I. Namioka, Linear Topological Spaces, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., Princeton, [12] Lj.D.R. Kočinac, O. Zabeti, Topological groups of bounded homomorphisms on a topological group, Filomat, this issue. [13] W. Rudin, Functional Analysis (Second edition), McGraw- Hill, New York, [14] R.A. Ryan, Introduction to Tensor Products of Banach Spaces, Monagraphs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, London, [15] H.H. Schaefer, Topological Vector Spaces (Second edition), Graduate Texts in Mathematics 3, Springer-Verlag, New York, [16] V.G. Troitsky, Spectral radii of bounded operators on topological vector spaces, Panamer. Math. J. 11:3 (2001) [17] A.W. Wickstead, Representation and duality of multiplication operators on Archimedean Riesz spaces, Compositio Math. 35 (1977) [18] O. Zabeti, Topological algebras of bounded operators on topological vector spaces, J. Adv. Res. Pure Math. 3:1 (2011)
H = {(1,0,0,...),(0,1,0,0,...),(0,0,1,0,0,...),...}.
II.4. Compactness 1 II.4. Compactness Note. Conway states on page 20 that the concept of compactness is an extension of benefits of finiteness to infinite sets. I often state this idea as: Compact sets
More informationA Banach-Dieudonné theorem for the space of bounded continuous functions on a separable metric space with the strict topology
Delft University of Technology A Banach-Dieudonné theorem for the space of bounded continuous functions on a separable metric space with the strict topology Kraaij, Richard DOI 10.1016/j.topol.2016.06.003
More informationBounded subsets of topological vector spaces
Chapter 2 Bounded subsets of topological vector spaces In this chapter we will study the notion of bounded set in any t.v.s. and analyzing some properties which will be useful in the following and especially
More informationTHREE LECTURES ON BASIC TOPOLOGY. 1. Basic notions.
THREE LECTURES ON BASIC TOPOLOGY PHILIP FOTH 1. Basic notions. Let X be a set. To make a topological space out of X, one must specify a collection T of subsets of X, which are said to be open subsets of
More informationDivision of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Convex Analysis and Economic Theory Winter Separation theorems
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Ec 181 KC Border Convex Analysis and Economic Theory Winter 2018 Topic 8: Separation theorems 8.1 Hyperplanes and half spaces Recall that a hyperplane in
More informationThe Set-Open topology
Volume 37, 2011 Pages 205 217 http://topology.auburn.edu/tp/ The Set-Open topology by A. V. Osipov Electronically published on August 26, 2010 Topology Proceedings Web: http://topology.auburn.edu/tp/ Mail:
More informationM3P1/M4P1 (2005) Dr M Ruzhansky Metric and Topological Spaces Summary of the course: definitions, examples, statements.
M3P1/M4P1 (2005) Dr M Ruzhansky Metric and Topological Spaces Summary of the course: definitions, examples, statements. Chapter 1: Metric spaces and convergence. (1.1) Recall the standard distance function
More informationOn Soft Topological Linear Spaces
Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research University of AL-Qadisiyah College of Computer Science and Formation Technology Department of Mathematics On Soft Topological Linear
More informationsimply ordered sets. We ll state only the result here, since the proof is given in Munkres.
p. 1 Math 490 Notes 20 More About Compactness Recall that in Munkres it is proved that a simply (totally) ordered set X with the order topology is connected iff it satisfies: (1) Every subset bounded above
More informationMATH 54 - LECTURE 10
MATH 54 - LECTURE 10 DAN CRYTSER The Universal Mapping Property First we note that each of the projection mappings π i : j X j X i is continuous when i X i is given the product topology (also if the product
More informationTopological properties of convex sets
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Ec 181 KC Border Convex Analysis and Economic Theory Winter 2018 Topic 5: Topological properties of convex sets 5.1 Interior and closure of convex sets Let
More informationTOPOLOGY CHECKLIST - SPRING 2010
TOPOLOGY CHECKLIST - SPRING 2010 The list below serves as an indication of what we have covered in our course on topology. (It was written in a hurry, so there is a high risk of some mistake being made
More informationT. Background material: Topology
MATH41071/MATH61071 Algebraic topology Autumn Semester 2017 2018 T. Background material: Topology For convenience this is an overview of basic topological ideas which will be used in the course. This material
More information2 A topological interlude
2 A topological interlude 2.1 Topological spaces Recall that a topological space is a set X with a topology: a collection T of subsets of X, known as open sets, such that and X are open, and finite intersections
More informationA Tour of General Topology Chris Rogers June 29, 2010
A Tour of General Topology Chris Rogers June 29, 2010 1. The laundry list 1.1. Metric and topological spaces, open and closed sets. (1) metric space: open balls N ɛ (x), various metrics e.g. discrete metric,
More informationPoint-Set Topology 1. TOPOLOGICAL SPACES AND CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS
Point-Set Topology 1. TOPOLOGICAL SPACES AND CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS Definition 1.1. Let X be a set and T a subset of the power set P(X) of X. Then T is a topology on X if and only if all of the following
More informationLocally convex topological vector spaces
Chapter 4 Locally convex topological vector spaces 4.1 Definition by neighbourhoods Let us start this section by briefly recalling some basic properties of convex subsets of a vector space over K (where
More informationI-CONTINUITY IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES. Martin Sleziak
I-CONTINUITY IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES Martin Sleziak Abstract. In this paper we generalize the notion of I-continuity, which was defined in [1] for real functions, to maps on topological spaces. We study
More informationA NOTE ON MORPHISMS DETERMINED BY OBJECTS
A NOTE ON MORPHISMS DETERMINED BY OBJECTS XIAO-WU CHEN, JUE LE Abstract. We prove that a Hom-finite additive category having determined morphisms on both sides is a dualizing variety. This complements
More informationREPRESENTATION OF DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES BY MEANS OF ORDERED STONE SPACES
REPRESENTATION OF DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES BY MEANS OF ORDERED STONE SPACES H. A. PRIESTLEY 1. Introduction Stone, in [8], developed for distributive lattices a representation theory generalizing that for
More informationTopology problem set Integration workshop 2010
Topology problem set Integration workshop 2010 July 28, 2010 1 Topological spaces and Continuous functions 1.1 If T 1 and T 2 are two topologies on X, show that (X, T 1 T 2 ) is also a topological space.
More informationCOMPUTABLE FRAMES IN COMPUTABLE BANACH SPACES
International Journal of Analysis and Applications ISSN 2291-8639 Volume 11, Number 2 (2016), 93-100 http://www.etamaths.com COMPUTABLE FRAMES IN COMPUTABLE BANACH SPACES S.K. KAUSHIK 1, AND POONAM MANTRY
More informationPoint-Set Topology II
Point-Set Topology II Charles Staats September 14, 2010 1 More on Quotients Universal Property of Quotients. Let X be a topological space with equivalence relation. Suppose that f : X Y is continuous and
More information4. Definition: topological space, open set, topology, trivial topology, discrete topology.
Topology Summary Note to the reader. If a statement is marked with [Not proved in the lecture], then the statement was stated but not proved in the lecture. Of course, you don t need to know the proof.
More informationElementary Topology. Note: This problem list was written primarily by Phil Bowers and John Bryant. It has been edited by a few others along the way.
Elementary Topology Note: This problem list was written primarily by Phil Bowers and John Bryant. It has been edited by a few others along the way. Definition. properties: (i) T and X T, A topology on
More informationCOMPLETE METRIC ABSOLUTE NEIGHBORHOOD RETRACTS
COMPLETE METRIC ABSOLUTE NEIGHBORHOOD RETRACTS WIES LAW KUBIŚ Abstract. We characterize complete metric absolute (neighborhood) retracts in terms of existence of certain maps of CW-polytopes. Using our
More informationA Review on 2-normed Structures
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 1, 2007, no. 4, 187-191 A Review on 2-normed Structures Mehmet Açıkgöz University of Gaziantep, Science and Arts Faculty Department of Mathematics, Gaziantep, Turkey
More informationISSN X (print) COMPACTNESS OF S(n)-CLOSED SPACES
Matematiqki Bilten ISSN 0351-336X (print) 41(LXVII) No. 2 ISSN 1857-9914 (online) 2017(30-38) UDC: 515.122.2 Skopje, Makedonija COMPACTNESS OF S(n)-CLOSED SPACES IVAN LONČAR Abstract. The aim of this paper
More informationMetric and metrizable spaces
Metric and metrizable spaces These notes discuss the same topic as Sections 20 and 2 of Munkres book; some notions (Symmetric, -metric, Ψ-spaces...) are not discussed in Munkres book.. Symmetric, -metric,
More informationFUZZY METRIC SPACES ZUN-QUAN XIA AND FANG-FANG GUO
J. Appl. Math. & Computing Vol. 16(2004), No. 1-2, pp. 371-381 FUZZY METRIC SPACES ZUN-QUAN XIA AND FANG-FANG GUO Abstract. In this paper, fuzzy metric spaces are redefined, different from the previous
More informationGENERALIZED METRIC SPACES AND TOPOLOGICAL STRUCTURE I
ANALELE ŞTIINŢIFICE ALE UNIVERSITĂŢII AL.I.CUZA IAŞI Tomul XLVI, s.i a, Matematică, 2000, f.1. GENERALIZED METRIC SPACES AND TOPOLOGICAL STRUCTURE I BY B.C. DHAGE Abstract. In this paper some results in
More informationTopology and Topological Spaces
Topology and Topological Spaces Mathematical spaces such as vector spaces, normed vector spaces (Banach spaces), and metric spaces are generalizations of ideas that are familiar in R or in R n. For example,
More informationFixed points of Kannan mappings in metric spaces endowed with a graph
An. Şt. Univ. Ovidius Constanţa Vol. 20(1), 2012, 31 40 Fixed points of Kannan mappings in metric spaces endowed with a graph Florin Bojor Abstract Let (X, d) be a metric space endowed with a graph G such
More informationReverse Polish notation in constructing the algorithm for polygon triangulation
Reverse Polish notation in constructing the algorithm for polygon triangulation Predrag V. Krtolica, Predrag S. Stanimirović and Rade Stanojević Abstract The reverse Polish notation properties are used
More informationA GRAPH FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY
A GRAPH FROM THE VIEWPOINT OF ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY KARL L. STRATOS Abstract. The conventional method of describing a graph as a pair (V, E), where V and E repectively denote the sets of vertices and edges,
More informationINTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY
INTRODUCTION TO TOPOLOGY MARTINA ROVELLI These notes are an outline of the topics covered in class, and are not substitutive of the lectures, where (most) proofs are provided and examples are discussed
More informationCharacterization of Boolean Topological Logics
Characterization of Boolean Topological Logics Short Form: Boolean Topological Logics Anthony R. Fressola Denison University Granville, OH 43023 University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, IL USA 61801-61802
More informationCOMMON FIXED-POINTS FOR EQU1CONTINUOUS SEMIGROUPS OF MAPPINGS
PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 33, Number I, May 1972 COMMON FIXED-POINTS FOR EQU1CONTINUOUS SEMIGROUPS OF MAPPINGS THEODORE MITCHELL1 Abstract. Let S be a semigroup of equicontinuous
More informationLecture 2 - Introduction to Polytopes
Lecture 2 - Introduction to Polytopes Optimization and Approximation - ENS M1 Nicolas Bousquet 1 Reminder of Linear Algebra definitions Let x 1,..., x m be points in R n and λ 1,..., λ m be real numbers.
More informationd(γ(a i 1 ), γ(a i )) i=1
Marli C. Wang Hyperbolic Geometry Hyperbolic surfaces A hyperbolic surface is a metric space with some additional properties: it has the shortest length property and every point has an open neighborhood
More informationMore reverse mathematics of the Heine-Borel Theorem
1 10 ISSN 1759-9008 1 More reverse mathematics of the Heine-Borel Theorem JEFFRY L HIRST JESSICA MILLER Abstract: Using the techniques of reverse mathematics, we characterize subsets X [0, 1] in terms
More informationNotes on categories, the subspace topology and the product topology
Notes on categories, the subspace topology and the product topology John Terilla Fall 2014 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 A little category theory 1 3 The subspace topology 3 3.1 First characterization of
More informationSection 26. Compact Sets
26. Compact Sets 1 Section 26. Compact Sets Note. You encounter compact sets of real numbers in senior level analysis shortly after studying open and closed sets. Recall that, in the real setting, a continuous
More informationTopological space - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Page 1 of 6 Topological space From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Topological spaces are mathematical structures that allow the formal definition of concepts such as convergence, connectedness, and continuity.
More informationMath 734 Aug 22, Differential Geometry Fall 2002, USC
Math 734 Aug 22, 2002 1 Differential Geometry Fall 2002, USC Lecture Notes 1 1 Topological Manifolds The basic objects of study in this class are manifolds. Roughly speaking, these are objects which locally
More informationThe generalized Schoenflies theorem
The generalized Schoenflies theorem Andrew Putman Abstract The generalized Schoenflies theorem asserts that if ϕ S n 1 S n is a topological embedding and A is the closure of a component of S n ϕ(s n 1
More informationNICOLAS BOURBAKI ELEMENTS OF MATHEMATICS. General Topology. Chapters 1-4. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo
NICOLAS BOURBAKI ELEMENTS OF MATHEMATICS General Topology Chapters 1-4 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo ADVICE TO THE READER v CONTENTS OF THE ELEMENTS OF MATHEMATICS SERIES
More informationCompactness Theorems for Saddle Surfaces in Metric Spaces of Bounded Curvature. Dimitrios E. Kalikakis
BULLETIN OF THE GREEK MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 51, 2005 (45 52) Compactness Theorems for Saddle Surfaces in Metric Spaces of Bounded Curvature Dimitrios E. Kalikakis Abstract The notion of a non-regular
More informationN. BOURBAKI. Topological Vector Spaces ELEMENTS OF MATHEMATICS. Chapters 1-5. Translated by H. G. EGGLESTON & S. MAD AN
N. BOURBAKI ELEMENTS OF MATHEMATICS Topological Vector Spaces Chapters 1-5 Translated by H. G. EGGLESTON & S. MAD AN Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York London Paris Tokyo Contents CHAPTER I. TOPOLOGICAL
More informationLecture 2 September 3
EE 381V: Large Scale Optimization Fall 2012 Lecture 2 September 3 Lecturer: Caramanis & Sanghavi Scribe: Hongbo Si, Qiaoyang Ye 2.1 Overview of the last Lecture The focus of the last lecture was to give
More informationSaturated Sets in Fuzzy Topological Spaces
Computational and Applied Mathematics Journal 2015; 1(4): 180-185 Published online July 10, 2015 (http://www.aascit.org/journal/camj) Saturated Sets in Fuzzy Topological Spaces K. A. Dib, G. A. Kamel Department
More informationTOPOLOGY, DR. BLOCK, FALL 2015, NOTES, PART 3.
TOPOLOGY, DR. BLOCK, FALL 2015, NOTES, PART 3. 301. Definition. Let m be a positive integer, and let X be a set. An m-tuple of elements of X is a function x : {1,..., m} X. We sometimes use x i instead
More informationSOME REMARKS CONCERNING D METRIC SPACES
SOME REMARKS CONCERNING D METRIC SPACES Zead Mustafa and Brailey Sims November 2003 Abstract In this note we make some remarks concerning D metric spaces, and present some examples which show that many
More informationLecture 11 COVERING SPACES
Lecture 11 COVERING SPACES A covering space (or covering) is not a space, but a mapping of spaces (usually manifolds) which, locally, is a homeomorphism, but globally may be quite complicated. The simplest
More informationSome fixed fuzzy point results using Hausdorff metric in fuzzy metric spaces
Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics Volume 13, No 5, (May 017), pp 641 650 ISSN: 093 9310 (print version) ISSN: 87 635 (electronic version) http://wwwafmiorkr @FMI c Kyung Moon Sa Co http://wwwkyungmooncom
More information7. The Gauss-Bonnet theorem
7. The Gauss-Bonnet theorem 7.1 Hyperbolic polygons In Euclidean geometry, an n-sided polygon is a subset of the Euclidean plane bounded by n straight lines. Thus the edges of a Euclidean polygon are formed
More informationFACES OF CONVEX SETS
FACES OF CONVEX SETS VERA ROSHCHINA Abstract. We remind the basic definitions of faces of convex sets and their basic properties. For more details see the classic references [1, 2] and [4] for polytopes.
More informationJournal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics
Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics SOME BOAS-BELLMAN TYPE INEQUALITIES IN -INNER PRODUCT SPACES S.S. DRAGOMIR, Y.J. CHO, S.S. KIM, AND A. SOFO School of Computer Science and Mathematics
More informationNOTES ON GENERAL TOPOLOGY
NOTES ON GENERAL TOPOLOGY PETE L. CLARK 1. The notion of a topological space Part of the rigorization of analysis in the 19th century was the realization that notions like convergence of sequences and
More informationA combinatorial proof of a formula for Betti numbers of a stacked polytope
A combinatorial proof of a formula for Betti numbers of a staced polytope Suyoung Choi Department of Mathematical Sciences KAIST, Republic of Korea choisy@aistacr (Current Department of Mathematics Osaa
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.lo] 9 Mar 2011
arxiv:03.776v [math.lo] 9 Mar 0 CONSTRUCTIVE PROOF OF BROUWER S FIXED POINT THEOREM FOR SEQUENTIALLY LOCALLY NON-CONSTANT FUNCTIONS BY SPERNER S LEMMA YASUHITO TANAKA Abstract. In this paper using Sperner
More informationSEQUENTIALLY COHEN-MACAULAY GRAPHS OF FORM θ n1,...,n k. Communicated by Siamak Yassemi. 1. Introduction
Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 36 No. 2 (2010), pp 109-118. SEQUENTIALLY COHEN-MACAULAY GRAPHS OF FORM θ n1,...,n k F. MOHAMMADI* AND D. KIANI Communicated by Siamak Yassemi Abstract.
More informationPOLYHEDRAL GEOMETRY. Convex functions and sets. Mathematical Programming Niels Lauritzen Recall that a subset C R n is convex if
POLYHEDRAL GEOMETRY Mathematical Programming Niels Lauritzen 7.9.2007 Convex functions and sets Recall that a subset C R n is convex if {λx + (1 λ)y 0 λ 1} C for every x, y C and 0 λ 1. A function f :
More informationManifolds. Chapter X. 44. Locally Euclidean Spaces
Chapter X Manifolds 44. Locally Euclidean Spaces 44 1. Definition of Locally Euclidean Space Let n be a non-negative integer. A topological space X is called a locally Euclidean space of dimension n if
More informationMath 190: Quotient Topology Supplement
Math 190: Quotient Topology Supplement 1. Introduction The purpose of this document is to give an introduction to the quotient topology. The quotient topology is one of the most ubiquitous constructions
More informationHowever, this is not always true! For example, this fails if both A and B are closed and unbounded (find an example).
98 CHAPTER 3. PROPERTIES OF CONVEX SETS: A GLIMPSE 3.2 Separation Theorems It seems intuitively rather obvious that if A and B are two nonempty disjoint convex sets in A 2, then there is a line, H, separating
More informationLecture-12: Closed Sets
and Its Examples Properties of Lecture-12: Dr. Department of Mathematics Lovely Professional University Punjab, India October 18, 2014 Outline Introduction and Its Examples Properties of 1 Introduction
More informationGeometric structures on manifolds
CHAPTER 3 Geometric structures on manifolds In this chapter, we give our first examples of hyperbolic manifolds, combining ideas from the previous two chapters. 3.1. Geometric structures 3.1.1. Introductory
More informationExistence and uniqueness of the solution for a general system of operator equations in b metric spaces endowed with a graph
Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 8 (217 No. 2, 263-276 ISSN: 28-6822 (electronic http://dx.doi.org/1.2275/ijnaa.217.11562.157 Existence and uniqueness of the solution for a general system of operator equations
More information4. Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
MATH41071/MATH61071 Algebraic topology Autumn Semester 2017 2018 4. Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology Geometric simplicial complexes 4.1 Definition. A finite subset { v 0, v 1,..., v r } R n
More informationLecture 15: The subspace topology, Closed sets
Lecture 15: The subspace topology, Closed sets 1 The Subspace Topology Definition 1.1. Let (X, T) be a topological space with topology T. subset of X, the collection If Y is a T Y = {Y U U T} is a topology
More informationStability of closedness of convex cones under linear mappings
Stability of closedness of convex cones under linear mappings Jonathan M. Borwein and Warren B. Moors 1 Abstract. In this paper we reconsider the question of when the continuous linear image of a closed
More informationTopology Proceedings. COPYRIGHT c by Topology Proceedings. All rights reserved.
Topology Proceedings Web: http://topology.auburn.edu/tp/ Mail: Topology Proceedings Department of Mathematics & Statistics Auburn University, Alabama 36849, USA E-mail: topolog@auburn.edu ISSN: 0146-4124
More informationGeneralized Convex Set-Valued Maps
Generalized Convex Set-Valued Maps September 20, 2008 Joël Benoist Department of Mathematics LACO URA-CNRS 1586 University of Limoges 87060 Limoges, France E-mail: benoist@unilim.fr Nicolae Popovici Faculty
More informationIn this chapter, we define limits of functions and describe some of their properties.
Chapter 2 Limits of Functions In this chapter, we define its of functions and describe some of their properties. 2.. Limits We begin with the ϵ-δ definition of the it of a function. Definition 2.. Let
More informationOrientation of manifolds - definition*
Bulletin of the Manifold Atlas - definition (2013) Orientation of manifolds - definition* MATTHIAS KRECK 1. Zero dimensional manifolds For zero dimensional manifolds an orientation is a map from the manifold
More informationTopology - I. Michael Shulman WOMP 2004
Topology - I Michael Shulman WOMP 2004 1 Topological Spaces There are many different ways to define a topological space; the most common one is as follows: Definition 1.1 A topological space (often just
More informationLecture 009 (November 25, 2009) Suppose that I is a small category, and let s(r Mod) I be the category of I-diagrams in simplicial modules.
Lecture 009 (November 25, 2009) 20 Homotopy colimits Suppose that I is a small category, and let s(r Mod) I be the category of I-diagrams in simplicial modules. The objects of this category are the functors
More informationOn Fuzzy Topological Spaces Involving Boolean Algebraic Structures
Journal of mathematics and computer Science 15 (2015) 252-260 On Fuzzy Topological Spaces Involving Boolean Algebraic Structures P.K. Sharma Post Graduate Department of Mathematics, D.A.V. College, Jalandhar
More informationFinal Test in MAT 410: Introduction to Topology Answers to the Test Questions
Final Test in MAT 410: Introduction to Topology Answers to the Test Questions Stefan Kohl Question 1: Give the definition of a topological space. (3 credits) A topological space (X, τ) is a pair consisting
More informationDefinition A metric space is proper if all closed balls are compact. The length pseudo metric of a metric space X is given by.
Chapter 1 Geometry: Nuts and Bolts 1.1 Metric Spaces Definition 1.1.1. A metric space is proper if all closed balls are compact. The length pseudo metric of a metric space X is given by (x, y) inf p. p:x
More informationNotes on point set topology, Fall 2010
Notes on point set topology, Fall 2010 Stephan Stolz September 3, 2010 Contents 1 Pointset Topology 1 1.1 Metric spaces and topological spaces...................... 1 1.2 Constructions with topological
More informationA Little Point Set Topology
A Little Point Set Topology A topological space is a generalization of a metric space that allows one to talk about limits, convergence, continuity and so on without requiring the concept of a distance
More informationMA651 Topology. Lecture 4. Topological spaces 2
MA651 Topology. Lecture 4. Topological spaces 2 This text is based on the following books: Linear Algebra and Analysis by Marc Zamansky Topology by James Dugundgji Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.at] 8 Jan 2015
HOMOLOGY GROUPS OF SIMPLICIAL COMPLEMENTS: A NEW PROOF OF HOCHSTER THEOREM arxiv:1501.01787v1 [math.at] 8 Jan 2015 JUN MA, FEIFEI FAN AND XIANGJUN WANG Abstract. In this paper, we consider homology groups
More informationA greedy, partially optimal proof of the Heine-Borel Theorem
A greedy, partially optimal proof of the Heine-Borel Theorem James Fennell September 28, 2017 Abstract The Heine-Borel theorem states that any open cover of the closed interval Œa; b contains a finite
More informationLecture 008 (November 13, 2009)
Lecture 008 (November 13, 2009) 17 The Dold-Kan correspondence Suppose that A : op R Mod is a simplicial R-module. Examples to keep in mind are the free simplicial objects R(X) associated to simplicial
More informationFURTHER APPLICATIONS OF CLUTTER DOMINATION PARAMETERS TO PROJECTIVE DIMENSION
FURTHER APPLICATIONS OF CLUTTER DOMINATION PARAMETERS TO PROJECTIVE DIMENSION HAILONG DAO AND JAY SCHWEIG Abstract. We study the relationship between the projective dimension of a squarefree monomial ideal
More informationChapter 2 Topological Spaces and Continuity
Chapter 2 Topological Spaces and Continuity Starting from metric spaces as they are familiar from elementary calculus, one observes that many properties of metric spaces like the notions of continuity
More informationMath 5593 Linear Programming Lecture Notes
Math 5593 Linear Programming Lecture Notes Unit II: Theory & Foundations (Convex Analysis) University of Colorado Denver, Fall 2013 Topics 1 Convex Sets 1 1.1 Basic Properties (Luenberger-Ye Appendix B.1).........................
More informationCountability Properties of the Pseudocompact-Open Topology on C(X): A Comparative Study
Rend. Istit. Mat. Univ. Trieste Vol. XXXIX, 421 444 (2007) Countability Properties of the Pseudocompact-Open Topology on C(X): A Comparative Study S. Kundu and Pratibha Garg ( ) Dedicated to Professor
More informationTopology Between Two Sets
Journal of Mathematical Sciences & Computer Applications 1 (3): 95 107, 2011 doi: 10.5147/jmsca.2011.0071 Topology Between Two Sets S. Nithyanantha Jothi 1 and P. Thangavelu 2* 1 Department of Mathematics,
More informationON CELLULAR RESOLUTION OF MONOMIAL IDEALS
ON CELLULAR RESOLUTION OF MONOMIAL IDEALS THE WORKSHOP ON COMPUTATIONAL DIFFERENTIAL ALGEBRA AND RELATED TOPICS SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS, IPM JUNE 21-25, 2014 TEHRAN, IRAN RAHIM ZAARE-NAHANDI, UNIVERSITY
More informationarxiv:math/ v3 [math.dg] 23 Jul 2007
THE INTRINSIC GEOMETRY OF A JORDAN DOMAIN arxiv:math/0512622v3 [math.dg] 23 Jul 2007 RICHARD L. BISHOP Abstract. For a Jordan domain in the plane the length metric space of points connected to an interior
More informationChapter 6. Curves and Surfaces. 6.1 Graphs as Surfaces
Chapter 6 Curves and Surfaces In Chapter 2 a plane is defined as the zero set of a linear function in R 3. It is expected a surface is the zero set of a differentiable function in R n. To motivate, graphs
More informationLecture notes for Topology MMA100
Lecture notes for Topology MMA100 J A S, S-11 1 Simplicial Complexes 1.1 Affine independence A collection of points v 0, v 1,..., v n in some Euclidean space R N are affinely independent if the (affine
More informationconsisting of compact sets. A spline subdivision scheme generates from such
Spline Subdivision Schemes for Compact Sets with Metric Averages Nira Dyn and Elza Farkhi Abstract. To dene spline subdivision schemes for general compact sets, we use the representation of spline subdivision
More informationSome new higher separation axioms via sets having non-empty interior
Bhat & Das, Cogent Mathematics (015), : 109695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/3311835.015.109695 PURE MATHEMATICS RESEARCH ARTICLE Some new higher separation axioms via sets having non-empty interior Pratibha
More informationKNOTTED SYMMETRIC GRAPHS
proceedings of the american mathematical society Volume 123, Number 3, March 1995 KNOTTED SYMMETRIC GRAPHS CHARLES LIVINGSTON (Communicated by Ronald Stern) Abstract. For a knotted graph in S* we define
More informationThe Filter Space of a Lattice: Its Role in General Topology B. Banaschewski
Proc. Univ. of Houston Lattice Theory Conf..Houston 1973 The Filter Space of a Lattice: Its Role in General Topology B. Banaschewski Introduction A filter in a lattice L is a non-void subset F of L for
More information