Blast Design and Vibration Control at Kayad Lead-Zinc Underground Mine

Transcription

1 Blast Design and Vibration Control at Kayad Lead-Zinc Underground Mine Pradeep K Singh, Chief Scientist & Professor, Academy of Scientific & Innovative Research CSIR - Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research, Dhanbad, India

2 Introduction Drilling and blasting continues to be an important method of rock excavation and rock breaking. Ground vibrations from blasting have been a constant problem for the mining and construction industries, the public living near the mining activities and the regulatory agencies responsible for setting safety and environmental standards. The three factors of ground vibrations that determine the degree of shaking are ground vibration amplitude (peak particle velocity; PPV), its duration and its frequency. The mining industry needs realistic design levels and also practical techniques to safe guard the structures in their periphery. Last but not the least, the mining operations should not be stopped only due to apprehension of the damage to the structures/buildings.

3 Salient feature about the Kayad u/g mine Hindustan Zinc Limited (HZL) is the largest Zinc producing co. of India. Kayad mine is latest opened Mine of HZL situated approx. 9 km from Ajmer city, Rajasthan India. Deposit having proven reserves and resource of 11.4 MT with 10.60% Zn, 1.70% Pb, 39 g/t Ag. There are three lenses namely the Main lens, K1A lens and S1 lens. The main lens has been explored to variable depths and maximum up to 50 mrl while K1A and S1 goes up to 350 mrl. The main lens ranges in average width from 5 m in steeper portions to about 40 m in the flat lying portion. Maximum strike of the main lens is 900 m at the depth of approx 250 m from the surface.

4 Machineries used at Kayad u/g mine

5 Blasting details In total 1203 blasts were performed and 2612 vibration data were recorded on the surface in the periphery of the mine. Development face blast : 1041 Slot raise blast: 110 Ring blast : 52 Dia. of blast holes: 45 mm - development face blasting 76 mm - slot raise and ring blasts 102 mm Reamers holes No. of holes: 17 to 78 in case of development face blasting No. of holes: 2 to 13 in case of Slot raise and ring blasting Total explosives weight detonated in blast around : 70 to 310 kg Explosives weight / delay : 3.90 to kg Initiation System : NONEL (shock tube) & Electronic delay detonators

6 Monitoring of Blast Vibration Blast vibration monitoring was carried out at 2 to 3 locations in Kayad village due to blasting at Kayad underground mine. In all the cases the monitoring of blast vibration were performed for vertical depth of 30 m to 185 m and horizontal distance up to 300 m from the vertically above point from the underground blasting face. Recorded blast vibration data were in the range of 2.34 to 14.6 mm/s. The recorded frequencies of vibrations were in the range of Hz. Natural frequency : 14 to 16 Hz

7 View of Vibration Monitoring Locations

8 Blast wave signature of development face blast

9 Development face blast propagation equation Correlation co-efficient = 84.2 % v = Peak particle velocity (mm/s) R = Distance between vibration monitoring point and blasting face (m) Qmax = Maximum explosive weight/delay (kg)

10 Plot of dominant peak frequencies of vibration The recorded frequencies of vibrations were in the range of Hz. The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analyses of vibration data obtained shows that the concentrations of vibration energy were in the range of Hz. The safe level of vibration has been taken as 15 mm/s for the safety of houses/ structures as per DGMS standard.

11 Development face blasting The Development blast face were conducted with different blast design in order to optimize blast design parameters and to control ground vibration at lowest possible levels. Initially, the blast were conducted with delay intervals of 15ms, 20ms and 25ms between the holes for detonation of 5 center holes taking one by one and the recorded vibration signatures with high sampling rate were analyzed. It was found that the delay interval of 25ms resulted into generation of lower level of ground vibration. The delay interval between subsequent holes were provided with 50ms with a jump delay of 200ms and 100ms at two sectional cut. The overall pull of the blast was in the range of 70-80%.

12 Development face blasting Initial practiced blast delay sequence and blast hole delay pattern for development face blast.

13 Development face blasting Another blast design for 5.5 m (W) 5.0 m (H) This blast design resulted with average pull of % and it was continued for the most of the cross-cut blasts

14 Development face blasting The design was slightly modified for decline and main faces blasts particularly in the drill design i.e., burden and spacing of the blast holes. The average pulls obtained in this modified design were of %.

15 Charging pattern of development face blasting Hole no. Delay [ms] Delay interval Hole no. Delay [ms] Delay interval [ms] Hole no. Delay [ms] Delay interval [ms] [ms] FACE 42 (Width m and Height m) Hole Type No. of Cartridge per hole Explosives per hole Explosives quantity holes Cut holes g = 4.34 kg 73.8 kg (187 cartridges) Easers or reliever holes g = 3.95 kg kg (300 cartridges) Lifter holes g = 4.34 kg 30.4 kg (77 cartridges) Perimeter holes g = 3.16 kg 28.4 kg (56 cartridges) Total explosive used in (kg) 251 kg (620 cartridges)

16 Slot raise blasting The slot raise blasts commented after sufficient development blasts were performed in north and south decline faces. The numbers of holes and deck charging were modified to get desired pull from the slot raise blast. The maximum pull of 2.7 m was recorded in a few blasts. The explosives loaded in slot holes were 4.5 to 9.4 kg. The number of blast holes varied between 3 and 14 depending upon the condition of blast holes. The total explosives in a blast round varied between 16 and 172 kg.

17 Slot raise blasting

18 Ring blasting Initially, the ring blasting started with emulsion cartridge explosives of 150 kg distributed in 5 blast holes and were detonated keeping the explosive weight per delay of 25 kg. No. of blast holes in case of ring blasting : 2 to 7. Total explosives detonated in a blasting round: 64 to 340 kg Explosives weight per delay : 11 to 17 kg In this case a few blast holes were decked up to 4 places with the help of electronic delay detonators. On the basis of waveform analysis, the delay interval of 20ms to 80ms at an interval of 20ms is found optimal in case of deck charging while the minimum delay of 40ms to maximum of 80ms is to be provided between the two successive blast holes.

19 Ring blasting

20 Blast wave signature of ring face blast

21 Ring blasting Two methodologies were adopted for providing decks and its detonations. The first one is by detonating hole one by one i.e. from bottom deck to top deck at an interval of 20ms up to 4 decks for all the blast holes. Second methodology by taking two explosives decks first (bottom slice) and latter on two explosives decks (top slice).

22 View of charging of holes and their connections

23 In-the-hole VOD measurement in ring blast holes The in-the-hole continuous velocity of detonation of emulsion explosives was also recorded for 4 holes of Ring. Out of 4 holes 3 holes were deck charged. The recorded in-thehole VOD of explosives of 1st hole were in the range of m/s.

24 In-the-hole VOD measurement in ring blast holes The recorded in-the-hole VOD of explosives of 2 nd hole were in the range of m/s.

25 Fragmentation analyses The fragmentation results of ring blast of S-2 Stope (Ring 5): Average mean size of the block is m The most common size of the block m. The maximum size of the boulder is 1.2 m.

26 Conclusions Kayad underground mine is successfully producing the minerals in close proximity to the inhabitant area by adopting state of the art blasting practices as discussed. The concept of 25ms delay interval between among the 5 center holes resulted lower levels of vibration. Further the 200ms and 300ms of delays between two successive cut holes gave excellent blast results. The reduction of 12.5 % in PPV levels observed by electronic delay detonators in comparison to shock tube initiation system. The delay interval between the holes of 40ms and 80ms at ring hole blasts and detonated with delay interval between decks of 20ms to 80ms resulted into reduced levels of vibration. The concept of taking bottom slice first and then the top slice gave desired results. The concept of taking 4 explosives decks in a hole was successfully implemented and it was also confirmed by the VOD trace of the data.

27