IP/LDP FAST PROTECTION SCHEMES
|
|
- Logan Smith
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IP/LDP FAST PROTECTION SCHEMES PL-NOG, OCT 203 Julian Lucek
2 AGENDA Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) brief review Improving LFA coverage Remote LFA (rlfa) Directed forwarding label LFA with automatically created RSVP bypasses Maximally Redundant Trees (MRT) 2 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
3 BACKGROUND RSVP Fast Reroute has been available for many years Advantages of simplicity: get full coverage as long as alternative path exists. Usually involves creating a full-mesh of RSVP LSPs between end-points There has been a lot of interest in IP and/or LDP FRR schemes. From operators who don t use RSVP traffic engineering etc and don t want to deploy a full RSVP mesh solely to make use of FRR. 3 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
4 SPF ROOTS & LFA ILLUSTRATED N 2 R2 3 S 3 D 3 N2 3 R3 Main SPF Backup SPF 4 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
5 LFA COVERAGE ISSUES 5 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
6 INCOMPLETE COVERAGE PROBLEM S R D R2 Consider traffic travelling from S to D (via R). R4 is not an LFA that protects the S-R link. In almost all deployments, don t get full coverage using just plain LFA. R4 R3 6 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
7 IMPROVING LFA COVERAGE WITH REMOTE LFA 7 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
8 REMOTE LFA Remote LFA extends LFA coverage by tunnelling packets inside LDP to reach a non-directly-connected router (a remote neighbour ). C.f. Targeted LDP session will be brought up automatically as needed. 8 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
9 REMOTE LFA S R D R2 Consider traffic travelling from S to D (via R). R4 is not an LFA that protects the S-R link. P-Space contains the routers that S can reach without using the S-R link. R4 R3 P-Space 9 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
10 REMOTE LFA R D Consider traffic travelling from S to D (via R). R4 is not an LFA that protects the S-R link. S R2 Extended P-Space contains the routers that S s direct neighbours can reach without using the S-R link. R4 R3 Extended P-Space 0 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
11 REMOTE LFA R S R4 Extended P-Space D R3 Q-Space R2 Q-Space contains the routers that normally reach D without using the S-R link. A router that is in both Extended P-Space and Q- Space is a PQ-node. It can be a Remote LFA of S, in order to protect the S-R link. R2 and R3 are PQ-nodes. Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
12 COVERAGE EXTENSION USING REMOTE LFA (CONT D) S R D R2 Remote LFA involves sending traffic to a PQ-node via a tunnel. The PQ-node then sends the traffic towards the destination. An LDP tunnel is used. Existing LDP LSP to R3 R4 R3 2 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
13 COVERAGE EXTENSION USING REMOTE LFA (CONT D) R D In the case of IP traffic being protected, S pushes the LDP label required to reach R3 on top of the IP packet. S Existing LDP LSP to R3 R4 R3 R2 Assuming PHP, packet arrives at R3 as a plain IP packet. R3 then forwards the packet to R2, as this is on the best path towards the destination, D. 3 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
14 COVERAGE EXTENSION USING REMOTE LFA (CONT D) R D In the case of LDP traffic being protected, a stack consisting of two LDP labels is used by S, i.e. LDP over LDP. S Existing LDP LSP to R3 R4 Targeted LDP session R3 R2 The outer LDP label, X, is the label required to reach R3. The inner LDP label, Y, is the label required to reach D from R3. A targeted LDP session (automatically created) is needed between R3 and S, so that S can learn the label, Y, advertised by R3 to reach D. 4 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
15 S COVERAGE EXTENSION USING REMOTE LFA (CONT D) R 8 D Q-Space R2 Remote LFA cannot provide full coverage for all scenarios. Remote LFA cannot be used in the example on the left no PQ-nodes! However, in real networks, Remote LFA usually improves coverage compared to just vanilla LFA. R4 R3 Extended P-Space The Remote LFA draft reported analysis of different SP topologies. R-LFA coverage was 00% in 4 cases, 78% in worst case. Average of the networks was 96%. 5 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
16 S RFLA COVERAGE EXTENSION USING DIRECTED- FORWARDING LABEL R R4 LDP LSP R3 8 D R2 IGP advertisement: Neighbour R: Label 00 As previously discussed, given the metrics shown, neither plain LFA or Remote LFA can protect against S-R link failure, for traffic going from source S to destination D. Directed Forwarding Label: R2 advertises via the IGP a strict-forwarding label pointing to D. S pushes this label onto the packet, and pushes the LDP label required to reach R2 on top. No targeted LDP session is needed. See Section 3. of for more details. 6 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
17 DIFFICULTY OF ATTAINING FULL COVERAGE WITH LFA 00% LFA Coverage gap! + Directed forwarding label + Remote LFA Difficult to reach 00% coverage without caveats. The closer we get to 00%, the more difficult is it to make further improvements. Fundamental problem is that we are trying to fight against the IGP metrics. 7 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
18 ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ACHIEVING FULL COVERAGE Would be better to have scheme in which packet is launched into a protection path that, regardless of topology/igp metrics, always takes the packet towards its destination without looping. We have a way, it s called RSVP! =>Use RSVP LSPs to augment LFA coverage, to 00% 8 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
19 IMPROVING LFA COVERAGE USING RSVP LSPS 9 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
20 COVERAGE EXTENSION USING DYNAMIC RSVP LSP S RSVP LSP R R4 D R3 R2 As R4 is not a valid LFA to protect the link from S to R, an RSVP bypass LSP is automatically created to R (i.e. the RSVP LSP goes all the way to the node on the far side of the protected link). From R the packet then travels to its original destination. Note: There is also an alternative mode in which RSVP LSP is always created (i.e. LFA is not configured/used) Already available in Junos 20 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
21 VERY EASY TO CONFIGURE {master}[edit] show protocols ldp interface all { link-protection { dynamic-rsvp-lsp; <==== } } 2 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
22 LFA + RSVP FOR FULL COVERAGE As we have seen in the previous slides, the LFA + RSVP scheme has the following properties: / If a valid LFA is present, that is used 2/ If no valid LFA is present, an RSVP bypass is automatically created 3/ Also, if the user does not want to use LFA at all, they can use the automatic RSVP bypass to cover everything. The advantages of the scheme are simplicity and full coverage. Not many RSVP LSPs needed: at most one per link per direction As well as unicast traffic, the scheme also applies to P2MP-LDP traffic! 22 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
23 LINK PROTECTION FOR P2MP-LDP LSPS 23 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
24 INTRODUCTION Juniper are pioneers of Point-to-Multipoint (P2MP) technology grand unification of MPLS and Multicast. RSVP-signalled P2MP LSPs have been available for ~8 years in Junos. Link Protection is supported for RSVP-signalled P2MP LSPs LDP-signalled P2MP LSPs (also known as mldp ) have been available in Junos since 20. As of 2.3, we now support Link Protection for LDP-signalled P2MP LSPs 24 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
25 LINK PROTECTION SCHEMES FOR LDP-P2MP LSPS The following schemes are supported: Case / Link protection using dynamically-created point-to-point RSVP bypass LSP Case 2/ Link protection using Loop-Free Alternate (LFA) Case 3/ Combination of the above two schemes LFA is used if one exists If no LFA exists, dynamically-created RSVP bypass LSP is used 25 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
26 Case : Using RSVP LSP for LDP-P2MP link protection Suppose R2 needs to protect the green LDP-P2MP LSP in the case that the R- R3 link should break. RSVP LSP is signaled from R2 to R3 via R6, avoiding interface ge-//0. The LSP is automatically created, no need to manually configure it If multiple LDP-P2MP LSPs use the R2->R3 link, the same RSVP LSP protects all of them If the R2-R3 link fails, R2 moves the LDP-P2MP traffic onto the RSVP LSP: the RSVP label (label L00) is pushed on top of the P2MP-LDP label (label L2). RSVP LSP R6 R4 R L00 R2 R3 LDP-P2MP LSP L22 Leaf L20 ge-//0.0 Root LSR-U LSR-D L2 Key: Green arrows: LDP P2MP LSP. Blue arrows: LDP label values distributed by LDP control plane Orange arrow: RSVP bypass LSP 26 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc. L23 R5 Leaf
27 Case 2: Using Loop-Free Alternate for LDP-P2MP link protection Suppose R2 needs to protect the green LDP-P2MP LSP in the case that the R-R3 link should break. R2 checks if a viable LFA path exists that avoids the R-R3 link. In the example, given the metrics shown, R6 is a valid LFA for the R2-R3 link. This is a vanilla LFA as used for unicast traffic If multiple LDP-P2MP LSPs use the R2->R3 link, the same LFA protects all of them (and also unicast traffic) If the R2-R3 link fails, R2 moves the LDP-P2MP traffic onto the LFA path: the unicast LDP label to reach R3 (label L00) is pushed on top of the P2MP-LDP label (label L2). Unicast LDP path R6 R4 R L00 R2 Metric=0 Metric=0 Metric=0 R3 LDP-P2MP LSP L22 Leaf L20 ge-//0.0 Root LSR-U LSR-D L2 R5 L23 Leaf 27 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
28 Case 3: Using Loop-Free Alternate if available, and RSVP LSP if LFA is not available Suppose R2 needs to protect the green LDP-P2MP LSP in the case that the R-R3 link should break. R2 checks if a viable LFA path exists that avoids the R-R3 link. In the example, given the metrics shown, R6 is a valid LFA for the R2-R3 link. This is a vanilla LFA as used for unicast traffic If multiple LDP-P2MP LSPs use the R2->R3 link, the same LFA protects all of them (and also unicast traffic) If the R2-R3 link fails, R2 moves the LDP-P2MP traffic onto the LFA path. Unicast LDP path R6 R4 R L00 R2 Metric=0 Metric=0 Metric=0 R3 LDP-P2MP LSP L22 Leaf L20 ge-//0.0 Root LSR-U LSR-D L2 R5 L23 Leaf 28 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
29 Case 3: Using Loop-Free Alternate if available, and RSVP LSP if LFA is not available (cont'd) Suppose the metrics are such that there is not a viable LFA that protects against R2->R3 link failure. In the diagram, the metric between R6 and R3 is 50. This means that R6 is not an LFA for R2->R3 traffic, because R6 would loop the traffic back to R2. In this case, an RSVP LSP is automatically created to protect the P2MP- LDP traffic travelling between R2 and R3. RSVP LSP R6 R4 R L00 R2 Metric=0 Metric=50 Metric=0 R3 LDP-P2MP LSP L22 Leaf L20 ge-//0.0 Root LSR-U LSR-D L2 R5 L23 Leaf 29 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
30 MRT 30 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
31 MRT-FRR For Node S to protect link S-N or Node N: Pick MRT-Blue since it doesn t use link S-N Traffic follows MRT-Blue path to destination D S A 0 0 Z SPT MRT-Blue MRT-Red N Y 0 X D W 3 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
32 KEY POINTS ABOUT MRT Provides 00% coverage for link and node failure, regardless of topology and IGP metrics. (Assuming there is another way to get to the destination!). Once packet is launched onto the blue or red tree, it travels to the destination Algorithm has been defined such that all nodes have a consistent notion of the blue and red trees associated with a given destination node Very fast to compute the trees Relatively easy (compared to LFA/rLFA) to answer the question What path will this traffic take to get to this destination if this link/node breaks?, especially with tree-tracing tools. Could be used as a supplement to LFA (use MRT blue or red path in absence of valid LFA) or as a complete alternative. 32 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
33 MRT LABEL DISTRIBUTION How are labels for the red and blue trees distributed? Using multi-topology LDP Different next-hops selected based upon both the MT-ID and FEC. Or using IGP-label advertisements The label advertisement drafts have made provision for an algorithm-id field. This can be used to identify label as belonging to red-mrt or blue- MRT as appropriate 0#page-5 0#page-8 33 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
34 SUMMARY Dynamically-created RSVP bypass LSPs are a very simple way of improving LFA coverage to 00% now available in Junos Works for both LDP unicast and LDP-P2MP traffic Maximally Redundant Trees Prototype code available soon 34 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
35 REFERENCES Remote LFA draft MRT architecture drafts (unicast) (multicast) 35 Copyright 200 Juniper Networks, Inc.
36
OSPF Extensions for MRT-FRR
OSPF Extensions for MRT-FRR Alia Atlas, Shraddha Hegde, Chris Bowers, Jeff Tantsura, Zhenbin Li, Nan Wu, Quintin Zhao IETF 87, Berlin, Germany 1 What is MRT-FRR? A 100% coverage fast-reroute solution for
More informationLoop Free Alternate and Remote Loop Free Alternate IP Fast Reroute
Loop Free Alternate and Remote Loop Free Alternate IP Fast Reroute Contents Introduction Prerequisites Requirements Components Used Background Information Understand MPLS Configure Network Diagram Configurations
More informationLDP Fast Reroute using LDP Downstream On Demand. 1. Problem: 2. Summary: 3. Description:
LDP Fast Reroute using LDP Downstream On Demand 1. Problem: LDP is a widely used label distribution protocol used for building end-to-end IP/MPLS LSPs across provider network. Many times critical IP applications
More informationAdvertising MPLS LSPs in the IGP
Advertising MPLS LSPs in the IGP draft-gredler-ospf-label-advertisement! draft-gredler-isis-label-advertisement! Hannes Gredler hannes@juniper.net IETF87, Berlin Two Types of Advertisement Label Range,
More informationNetwork Configuration Example
Network Configuration Example Configuring RSVP-Signaled Point-to-Multipoint LSPs on Logical Systems Modified: 2017-01-18 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA 408-745-2000
More informationHigh Availability for 2547 VPN Service
Fast Service Restoration High Availability for 2547 VPN Service Emil Gągała JNCIE PLNOG, Kraków, 21.10.2012 ACKLOWLEDGEMENTS Many thanks to Yakov Rekhter, Hannes Gredler for their contributions to the
More informationInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. J. Tantsura Individual IJ. Wijnands Cisco Systems, Inc.
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8320 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 A. Atlas K. Tiruveedhula C. Bowers Juniper Networks J. Tantsura Individual IJ. Wijnands Cisco
More informationMRT- FRR: Architecture, Algorithms, Analysis, and Extensions
MRT- FRR: Architecture, Algorithms, Analysis, and Extensions Alia Atlas, Gabor Enyedi, Andras Csaszar, Bob Kebler, Shraddha Hegde, Chris Bowers, Jeff Tantsura, Abishek Gopalan, Kishore Tiruveedhula, Russ
More informationFast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP based LSPs
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP based LSPs draft-esale-mpls-ldp-node-frr-00 Raveendra Torvi (rtorvi@juniper.net) Luay Jalil (luay.jalil@verizon.com) Luyuan Fang (lufang@microsoft.com) Santosh Esale
More informationRouting Resiliency Latest Enhancements
Routing Resiliency Latest Enhancements Clarence Filsfils cf@cisco.com Agenda Per-Prefix LFA Remote LFA Segment Routing Topology-Independent LFA 3 Acknowledgement Stephane Litkowski and Bruno Decraene,
More informationNetwork Configuration Example
Network Configuration Example Ingress Replication for MVPN and for IP Multicast Using Next Gen MVPN Modified: 2016-12-20 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA 408-745-2000
More informationTechniques and Protocols for Improving Network Availability
Techniques and Protocols for Improving Network Availability Don Troshynski dtroshynski@avici.com February 26th, 2004 Outline of Talk The Problem Common Convergence Solutions An Advanced Solution: RAPID
More informationPIM-tunnels and MPLS P2MP as Multicast data plane in IPTV and MVPN. Lesson learned
PIM-tunnels and MPLS P2MP as Multicast data plane in IPTV and MVPN Lesson learned Speaker Rafał Szarecki JNCIE-M/T #136, JNCIP-E #106, JNCI rafal@juniper.net Curriculum Juniper Networks; Professional Services
More informationIP Fast Reroute Applicability. Pierre Francois Institute IMDEA Networks
IP Fast Reroute Applicability Pierre Francois Institute IMDEA Networks Pierre.Francois@imdea.org Agenda IGP (Fast) Convergence IGP Fast Reroute (Hitless maintenance operations) IGP Fast convergence Pushing
More informationMPLS, THE BASICS CSE 6067, UIU. Multiprotocol Label Switching
MPLS, THE BASICS CSE 6067, UIU Multiprotocol Label Switching Basic Concepts of MPLS 2 Contents Drawbacks of Traditional IP Forwarding Basic MPLS Concepts MPLS versus IP over ATM Traffic Engineering with
More informationSegment Routing. Jérôme DURAND Consulting Systems Engineer - FRNOG #21 20 septembre 2013
Segment Routing Jérôme DURAND Consulting Systems Engineer jerduran@cisco.com - http://reseauxblog.cisco.fr FRNOG #21 20 septembre 2013 2011 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Simplicity
More informationBGP-TE APPLICATION LEVEL TOPOLOGY INTELLIGENCE
BGP-TE APPLICATION LEVEL TOPOLOGY INTELLIGENCE Hannes Gredler 1 Copyright 2012 Juniper Networks, Inc. www.juniper.net MOTIVATION Look across the fence Fence being IGP area/level or AS boundary Gain visibility
More informationMulti Topology Routing Truman Boyes
Multi Topology Routing Truman Boyes truman@juniper.net Copyright 2008 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1 Traffic Engineering Choices Today: IGP Metric Costing RSVP TE end to end Policy based routing EROs, Offline
More information"Charting the Course...
Description Course Summary This advanced bootcamp combines JMF, JL2V, and JL3V into five consecutive days of training. Students can choose to attend the individual classes (JMF, JL2V, or JL3V) or attend
More informationInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7490 Category: Standards Track
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7490 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 S. Bryant C. Filsfils S. Previdi Cisco Systems M. Shand Independent Contributor N. So Vinci Systems
More informationIntroduction to Segment Routing Santiago Álvarez, Distinguished Technical Marketing Engineer BRKRST-2124
Introduction to Segment Routing Santiago Álvarez, Distinguished Technical Marketing Engineer BRKRST-2124 Agenda Technology Overview Use Cases A Closer Look to Control and Data Plane Traffic Protection
More informationJuniper Networks Live-Live Technology
Juniper Networks Live-Live Technology Increasing Resiliency 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 3 Introduction... 3 Resiliency Challenges... 3 Juniper s Live-Live Solution...4 Live-Live...4 How MoFRR
More informationSDN Workshop. Contact: WSDN01_v0.1
SDN Workshop Contact: training@apnic.net WSDN01_v0.1 Issue Date: [Date] Revision: [xx] Segment Routing SDN Workshop WSDN01_v0.1 Issue Date: [Date] Revision: [xx] Overview In a nutshell Introduction to
More informationENTERPRISE MPLS. Kireeti Kompella
ENTERPRISE MPLS Kireeti Kompella AGENDA The New VLAN Protocol Suite Signaling Labels Hierarchy Signaling Advanced Topics Layer 2 or Layer 3? Resilience and End-to-end Service Restoration Multicast ECMP
More informationCore of Multicast VPNs: Rationale for Using mldp in the MVPN Core
Core of Multicast VPNs: Rationale for Using mldp in the MVPN Core Exploring Suitability of Using mldp Versus P2MP RSVP-TE in the MVPN Core Multicast Virtual Private Network (MVPN) is a popular technology
More informationNetwork Configuration Example
Network Configuration Example Configuring Protocol Independent Multicast Join Load Balancing Release NCE0054 Modified: 2017-01-20 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale, California 94089
More informationLARGE SCALE IP ROUTING LECTURE BY SEBASTIAN GRAF
LARGE SCALE IP ROUTING LECTURE BY SEBASTIAN GRAF MODULE 07 - MPLS BASED LAYER 2 SERVICES 1 by Xantaro MPLS BASED LAYER 2 VPNS USING MPLS FOR POINT-TO-POINT LAYER 2 SERVICES 2 by Xantaro Why are Layer-2
More informationOSPF Protocol Overview on page 187. OSPF Standards on page 188. OSPF Area Terminology on page 188. OSPF Routing Algorithm on page 190
Chapter 17 OSPF Protocol Overview The Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol is an interior gateway protocol (IGP) that routes packets within a single autonomous system (AS). OSPF uses link-state information
More informationEgress Protection (draft-shen-mpls-egress-protection-framework) Presented by Krzysztof G. Szarkowicz NANOG71 October 4, 2017
Egress Protection (draft-shen-mpls-egress-protection-framework) Presented by Krzysztof G. Szarkowicz NANOG71 October 4, 2017 Current status draft-shen-mpls-egress-protection-framework-05 Co-authored by
More informationMPLS etc.. MPLS is not alone TEST. 26 April 2016 AN. Multi-Protocol Label Switching MPLS-TP FEC PBB-TE VPLS ISIS-TE MPƛS GMPLS SR RSVP-TE OSPF-TE PCEP
Multi-Protocol Label Switching MPLS-TP FEC VPLS PBB-TE MPLS etc.. MPLS is not alone LDP MPLS-TE LABEL MP-BGP LSP TAG H-VPLS 26 April 2016 AN TEST GMPLS SR T-MPLS ISIS-TE MPƛS OSPF-TE PCEP Multi-Protocol
More informationIxNetwork TM mldp Emulation
IxNetwork TM mldp Emulation Test the Functionality, Performance, and Scalability of mldp-enabled Ingress, Egress or Transit LSRs Multicast LDP (mldp) is a set of extensions to the Label Distribution Protocol
More informationStateless Multicast with Bit Indexed Explicit Replication (BIER)
Stateless Multicast with it Indexed Explicit Replication (IER) Alvaro Retana (aretana@cisco.com) Distinguished Engineer, Cisco Services Slides by: IJsbrand Wijnands it Indexed Explicit Replication (IER)
More informationScaling considerations in MPLS networks. Ina Minei
Scaling considerations in MPLS networks Ina Minei ina@juniper.net Disclaimer The views presented are of the author and do not necessarily represent Juniper Networks. This presentation is vendor-independent.
More informationSDN Controllers in the WAN: protocols and applications
SDN Controllers in the WAN: protocols and applications Julian Lucek jlucek@juniper.net @julianlucek Agenda SDN Controller for WAN concept Enabling protocols BGP Link State (BGP-LS) Path Computation Element
More informationMultipoint LDP (mldp)
1 Multipoint LDP (mldp) IJsbrand Wijnands BRKIPM-3111 Agenda Introduction FEC encoding Capability negotiation P2MP & MP2MP LSPs Root Node Redundancy Fast ReRoute using Link Protection Make Before Break
More informationInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7140 Category: Standards Track
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7140 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 L. Jin F. Jounay Orange CH IJ. Wijnands Cisco Systems, Inc N. Leymann Deutsche Telekom AG March
More informationNetwork Configuration Example
Network Configuration Example Configuring BGP Autodiscovery for LDP VPLS Release NCE0035 Modified: 2017-01-24 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA 408-745-2000 www.juniper.net
More informationMPLS Egress Protection Framework draft-shen-mpls-egress-protectionframework-02
MPLS Egress Protection Framework draft-shen-mpls-egress-protectionframework-02 Yimin Shen (yshen@juniper.net) Minto Jeyananth (minto@juniper.net) Bruno Decraene (bruno.decraene@orange.com) Updates New
More informationNetwork Configuration Example
Network Configuration Example Configuring VPLS Multihoming Using Autodiscovery (FEC 129) Release NCE0072 Modified: 2016-10-26 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA
More informationMinimizing Packet Loss
Minimizing Packet Loss Eric Osborne Russ White genda Intro What Is Convergence? Brief History Talk Talk Faster Precompute Precompute and Tunnel Current State of the rt 3 Minimizing Packet Loss with IGPs
More informationConfigure Topology-Independent Loop-Free Alternate (TI-LFA)
Configure Topology-Independent Loop-Free Alternate (TI-LFA) Topology-Independent Loop-Free Alternate (TI-LFA) uses segment routing to provide link protection in topologies where other fast reroute techniques
More informationNetwork Configuration Example
Network Configuration Example RSVP LSP Tunnels Modified: 2016-12-14 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA 408-745-2000 www.juniper.net All rights reserved. Juniper
More informationLARGE SCALE IP ROUTING LECTURE BY SEBASTIAN GRAF
LARGE SCALE IP ROUTING LECTURE BY SEBASTIAN GRAF MODULE 05 MULTIPROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING (MPLS) AND LABEL DISTRIBUTION PROTOCOL (LDP) 1 by Xantaro IP Routing In IP networks, each router makes an independent
More informationBW Protection. 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
BW Protection 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Cisco MPLS - Traffic Engineering for VPNs Amrit Hanspal Sr. Product Manager MPLS & QoS Internet Technologies Division 2 Agenda MPLS Fundamentals
More informationIntroduction to Segment Routing
Segment Routing (SR) is a flexible, scalable way of doing source routing. Overview of Segment Routing, page 1 How Segment Routing Works, page 2 Examples for Segment Routing, page 3 Benefits of Segment
More informationBit Indexed Explicit Replication A Stateless Multicast Architecture. Nagendra Kumar Nainar NANOG72
Bit Indexed Explicit Replication A Stateless Multicast Architecture Nagendra Kumar Nainar NANOG72 Agenda Multicast Architecture Challenges Introduction to BIER BIER Control plane behavior BIER Data plane
More informationSYSC 5801 Protection and Restoration
SYSC 5801 Protection and Restoration Introduction Fact: Networks fail. Types of failures: Link failures Node failures Results: packet losses, waste of resources, and higher delay. What IGP does in the
More informationEmerging MPLS OAM mechanisms
Emerging MPLS OAM mechanisms Answering the interoperability and scalability question Data Networks Operation John Nakulski Product Manager October 2006 Page 1 Agenda Introduction The Need for MPLS OAM
More informationConfiguring MPLS L2VPN
Contents Configuring MPLS L2VPN 1 MPLS L2VPN overview 1 About MPLS L2VPN 1 Comparison with traditional VPN 2 Comparison with MPLS L3VPN 2 Basic concepts 2 MPLS L2VPN implementation 3 MPLS L2VPN configuration
More informationConfiguring MPLS L2VPN
Contents Configuring MPLS L2VPN 1 Overview 1 Comparison with traditional VPN 1 Comparison with MPLS L3VPN 2 Basic concepts 2 MPLS L2VPN implementation 3 MPLS L2VPN configuration task list 4 Configuring
More informationConfigure Segment Routing Mapping Server
The mapping server is a key component of the interworking between LDP and segment routing. It enables SR-capable nodes to interwork with LDP nodes. The mapping server advertises Prefix-to-SID mappings
More informationHIGH AVAILABILITY DESIGN
IP/MPLS CORE HIGH AVAILABILITY DESIGN Mars Chen 27 th January 2010 TODAY S IP NETWORK Is an infrastructure that supports mission critical services: VoIP/Mobility Converged
More informationInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. T. Morin France Telecom - Orange Y. Rekhter. Juniper Networks.
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6514 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 R. Aggarwal Juniper Networks E. Rosen Cisco Systems, Inc. T. Morin France Telecom - Orange Y.
More informationMulti Protocol Label Switching (an introduction) Karst Koymans. Thursday, March 12, 2015
.. MPLS Multi Protocol Label Switching (an introduction) Karst Koymans Informatics Institute University of Amsterdam (version 4.3, 2015/03/09 13:07:57) Thursday, March 12, 2015 Karst Koymans (UvA) MPLS
More informationMPLS. 9 March 2018 AN
MPLS 9 March 2018 AN Multi-Protocol Label Switching MPLS-TP MP-BGP H-VPLS OSPF-TE LIB MPLS is not alone LSP ISIS-TE EVPN GMPLS MPLS-TE T-MPLS LFIB LABEL LDP TAG Used in many (most?) provider networks to
More informationMPLS опорни мрежи MPLS core networks
MPLS опорни мрежи MPLS core networks Николай Милованов/Nikolay Milovanov http://niau.org Objectives Identify the drawbacks of traditional IP routing Describe basic MPLS concepts and LSR types. MPLS Labels
More informationAgenda DUAL STACK DEPLOYMENT. IPv6 Routing Deployment IGP. MP-BGP Deployment. OSPF ISIS Which one?
DUAL STACK DEPLOYMENT Alvaro Retana (alvaro.retana@hp.com) Distinguished Technologist 2010 2011 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice
More informationBrainDumps.4A0-103,230.Questions
BrainDumps.4A0-103,230.Questions Number: 4A0-103 Passing Score: 800 Time Limit: 120 min File Version: 11.02 http://www.gratisexam.com/ A "brain dump," as it relates to the certification exams, is a source
More informationMPLS Traffic Engineering Traffic Protection using Fast Re-route (FRR)
MPLS Traffic Engineering Traffic Protection using Fast Re-route (FRR) Santiago Álvarez August 2008 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 MPLS TE Use Cases Strategic Bandwidth Optimization Tactical
More informationIS-IS Configuration Commands. Generic Commands. shutdown IS-IS XRS Routing Protocols Guide Page 533. Syntax [no] shutdown
IS-IS IS-IS Configuration Commands Generic Commands shutdown Syntax [no] shutdown config>router>isis>interface ip-int-name config>router>isis>if>level level-number config>router>isis>if>segment-routing
More informationGlobal Table Multicast with BGP-MVPN Protocol draft-zzhang-mboned-mvpn-global-table-mcast-00
Global Table Multicast with BGP-MVPN Protocol draft-zzhang-mboned-mvpn-global-table-mcast-00 Jeffrey Zhang, Lenny Giuliano Juniper Dante Pacella Verizon Jason Schiller - Google Problem Statement Global
More informationIntended status: Standards Track. C. Bowers Juniper Networks August 29, 2016
Routing Area Working Group Internet-Draft Intended status: Standards Track Expires: March 2, 2017 Anil Kumar S N Gaurav Agrawal Vinod Kumar S Huawei Technologies C. Bowers Juniper Networks August 29, 2016
More informationStateless Multicast with Bit Indexed Explicit Replication
Stateless Multicast with Bit Indexed Explicit Replication IJsbrand Wijnands, Distinguished Engineer Cisco Spark How Questions? Use Cisco Spark to communicate with the speaker after the session 1. Find
More informationCisco Systems, Inc. Bruno Decraene Stephane Litkowski Orange November 18, 2013
Network Working Group Internet-Draft Intended status: Standards Track Expires: May 22, 2014 Pierre Francois Institute IMDEA Networks Clarence Filsfils Ahmed Bashandy Cisco Systems, Inc. Bruno Decraene
More informationCertShiken という認定試験問題集の権威的な提供者. CertShiken.
CertShiken という認定試験問題集の権威的な提供者 CertShiken http://www.certshiken.com Exam : JN0-360 Title : Juniper Networks Certified Internet Specialist, Service Provider (JNCIS-SP) Vendor : Juniper Version : DEMO Get
More informationLabel Distribution Protocol and Basic MPLS Configuration. APNIC Technical Workshop October 23 to 25, Selangor, Malaysia Hosted by:
Label Distribution Protocol and Basic MPLS Configuration APNIC Technical Workshop October 23 to 25, 2017. Selangor, Malaysia Hosted by: Issue Date: [201609] Revision: [01] Label Distribution Protocol 2
More informationConcepts and Operation of MPLS VPNs. Francisco Bolanos
Concepts and Operation of MPLS VPNs Francisco Bolanos fbolanos@cisco.com 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Agenda MPLS Concepts Label Structure Label assignment and distribution RD, RT and
More information2D1490 p MPLS, RSVP, etc. Olof Hagsand KTHNOC/NADA
2D1490 p4 2007 MPLS, RSVP, etc Olof Hagsand KTHNOC/NADA Literature Handouts: MPLS-Enabled applications (Minei, Lucek). Parts of Section 1. JunOS Cookbook: Chapter 14 Background MPLS - Multiprotocol Label
More information6 MPLS Model User Guide
6 MPLS Model User Guide Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) is a multi-layer switching technology that uses labels to determine how packets are forwarded through a network. The first part of this document
More informationComputer Network Architectures and Multimedia. Guy Leduc. Chapter 2 MPLS networks. Chapter 2: MPLS
Computer Network Architectures and Multimedia Guy Leduc Chapter 2 MPLS networks Chapter based on Section 5.5 of Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach, 6 th edition. Jim Kurose, Keith Ross Addison-Wesley,
More informationNetwork Working Group. Expires: April 19, 2014 The University of Arizona M. Boucadair France Telecom October 16, 2013
Network Working Group Internet-Draft Intended status: Informational Expires: April 19, 2014 J. Dong M. Zhang Huawei Technologies B. Zhang The University of Arizona M. Boucadair France Telecom October 16,
More informationDeploying Next-Generation Multicast VPN. Emil Gągała PLNOG, Warsaw,
Deploying Next-Generation Multicast VPN Emil Gągała PLNOG, Warsaw, 5.03.2010 Agenda Introduction to Next-Generation Multicast VPN (NG-MVPN) How to migrate smoothly from draft-rosen to NG-MVPN IPTV NG-MVPN
More informationStateless Multicast with Bit Indexed Explicit Replication
Stateless Multicast with Bit Indexed Explicit Replication IJsbrand Wijnands Distinguished Engineer BRKIPM-2239 Agenda Introduction Solution Overview Encapsulation Sets and Areas Forwarding ECMP BIER Overlay
More informationSpirent TestCenter EVPN and PBB-EVPN AppNote
Spirent TestCenter EVPN and PBB-EVPN AppNote Executive summary 2 Overview of EVPN 2 Relevant standards 3 Test case: Single Home Test Scenario for EVPN 4 Overview 4 Objective 4 Topology 4 Step-by-step instructions
More informationNetwork Configuration Example
Network Configuration Example Interconnecting a Layer 2 Circuit with a Layer 3 VPN Modified: 2017-01-19 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1133 Innovation Way Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA 408-745-2000 www.juniper.net
More informationInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Juniper Networks, Inc. J. Tantsura Ericsson Q. Zhao Huawei Technology January 2016
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7715 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 IJ. Wijnands, Ed. K. Raza Cisco Systems, Inc. A. Atlas Juniper Networks, Inc. J. Tantsura Ericsson
More informationJunos OS. RSVP LSP Tunnels Feature Guide. Release Published: Copyright 2011, Juniper Networks, Inc.
Junos OS RSVP LSP Tunnels Feature Guide Release 11.4 Published: 2011-11-08 Juniper Networks, Inc. 1194 North Mathilda Avenue Sunnyvale, California 94089 USA 408-745-2000 www.juniper.net This product includes
More informationBIER. Bit Indexed Explicit Replica0on. MBONED, IETF 92 Greg Shepherd
BIER Bit Indexed Explicit Replica0on MBONED, IETF 92 Greg Shepherd The BIER Epiphany Only encode the end- receivers in the packet header. Not the intermediate nodes. Assign end- receivers a Bit Posi0on
More informationLab 1: Static MPLS LSP-RTX4-RTX1 LSP-RTX1-RTX4 LSP-RTX3-RTX2 LSP-RTX2-RTX3
Lab 1: Static MPLS First lab gives a basic understanding of MPLS label swapping No signaling manually assign labels like static routing Understand configuration, forwarding tables, and debugging of MPLS
More informationIntroduction to Segment Routing
Introduction to Segment Routing Michael Kowal, Vertical Solutions Architect @ciscomk Abstract Introduction to Segment Routing This session provides an overview of the segment routing technology and its
More informationSession 2: MPLS Traffic Engineering and Constraint-Based Routing (CR)
MPLS Frame Relay Alliance formed in April 2003 Session 2: MPLS Traffic Engineering and Constraint-Based Routing (CR) Copyright 2003 MPLS Frame Relay Alliance Slide 2-12 MPLS Routing h The need for Traffic
More informationInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: Y. Cai Alibaba Group T. Morin Orange June 2016
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7900 Updates: 6513, 6514, 6625 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 Y. Rekhter, Ed. E. Rosen, Ed. Juniper Networks, Inc. R. Aggarwal Arktan
More informationJunos MPLS and VPNs. Day(s): 5. Course Code: Overview
Junos MPLS and VPNs Day(s): 5 Course Code: JMV Overview This five-day course is designed to provide students with MPLS-based virtual private network (VPN) knowledge and configuration examples. The course
More informationDeploying MPLS Traffic Engineering
9/27/16 Deploying MPLS Traffic Engineering Nurul Islam Roman (nurul@apnic.net) Cisco Public Agenda Technology Overview Bandwidth optimization TE for QoS Traffic Protection Inter- Domain Traffic Engineering
More informationPractice exam questions for the Nokia NRS II Composite Exam
Practice exam questions for the Nokia NRS II Composite Exam The following questions will test your knowledge and prepare you for the Nokia NRS II Composite Exam. Compare your responses with the Answer
More informationTestking.4A0-103,249.QA 4A Alcatel-Lucent Multi Protocol Label Switching
Testking.4A0-103,249.QA Number: 4A0-103 Passing Score: 800 Time Limit: 120 min File Version: 6.0 http://www.gratisexam.com/ 4A0-103 Alcatel-Lucent Multi Protocol Label Switching 1. These are the most accurate
More informationSegment Rou+ng IETF 87
Segment Rou+ng IETF 87 Clarence Filsfils cf@cisco.com C. Filsfils, S. Previdi, A. Bashandy, B. Decraene, S. Litkowski, M. Horneffer, I. Milojevic, R. Shakir, S. YP, W. Henderickx, J. Tantsura, Ericsson,
More informationOperation Manual MPLS VLL. Table of Contents
Table of Contents Table of Contents... 1-1 1.1 MPLS VLL Overview... 1-2 1.1.1 Concepts in MPLS VLL... 1-2 1.1.2 Introduction to MPLS VLL... 1-2 1.1.3 Packet Forwarding... 1-3 1.1.4 Implementation... 1-4
More informationConfiguring MPLS, MPLS VPN, MPLS OAM, and EoMPLS
CHAPTER 43 Configuring MPLS, MPLS VPN, MPLS OAM, and EoMPLS This chapter describes how to configure multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) and Ethernet over MPLS (EoMPLS) on the Cisco ME 3800X and ME 3600X
More informationOpen Shortest Path First IGP. Intended status: Standards Track
Open Shortest Path First IGP Internet-Draft Intended status: Standards Track Expires: December 28, 2014 S. Hegde H. Raghuveer H. Gredler Juniper Networks, Inc. R. Shakir British Telecom A. Smirnov Cisco
More informationA Segment Routing (SR) Tutorial. R. Bonica NANOG70 June 6, 2017
A Segment Routing (SR) Tutorial R. Bonica NANOG70 June 6, 2017 AKA: SPRING IETF Standardization Source Packet Routing In Networking (SPRING) WG ISIS, OSPF, IDR and MPLS WGs What is SR? A tunneling technology
More informationTable of Contents 1 Multicast VPN Configuration 1-1
Table of Contents 1 Multicast VPN Configuration 1-1 Multicast VPN Overview 1-1 Introduction to MPLS L3VPN 1-1 Introduction to Multicast VPN 1-2 Introduction to MD-VPN 1-4 Protocols and Standards 1-7 How
More informationMPLS-TE Configuration Application
CHAPTER 6 The contains the following tabs and subtabs: Global Tab, page 6-53 Labels Tab, page 6-54 Links Tab, page 6-55 General Subtab, page 6-56 Backup Tunnels Subtab, page 6-57 Tunnel Head Tab, page
More informationVendor: Alcatel-Lucent. Exam Code: 4A Exam Name: Alcatel-Lucent Multiprotocol Label Switching. Version: Demo
Vendor: Alcatel-Lucent Exam Code: 4A0-103 Exam Name: Alcatel-Lucent Multiprotocol Label Switching Version: Demo QUESTION 1 You wish to advertise LDP labels for all local networks; which is the most effective
More informationMPLS DiffServ-aware Traffic Engineering
White Paper MPLS DiffServ-aware Traffic Engineering Ina Minei Software Engineer Juniper Networks, Inc. 1194 North Mathilda Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA 408 745 2000 or 888 JUNIPER www.juniper.net Part
More informationCisco Training - HD Telepresence MPLS: Implementing Cisco MPLS V3.0. Upcoming Dates. Course Description. Course Outline
Cisco Training - HD Telepresence MPLS: Implementing Cisco MPLS V3.0 From the technology basics to advanced VPN configuration. $3,995.00 5 Days Upcoming Dates Dec 10 - Dec 14 Mar 25 - Mar 29 Course Description
More informationInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7032 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 T. Beckhaus, Ed. Deutsche Telekom AG B. Decraene Orange K. Tiruveedhula Juniper Networks M. Konstantynowicz,
More informationSegment Routing Commands
Segment Routing Commands address ipv4 (PCE), page 4 adjacency-sid, page 5 apply-weight ecmp-only bandwidth, page 7 attribute-set, page 8 autoroute announce, page 10 autoroute destination, page 12 clear
More informationLink Failure Recovery for MPLS Networks with Multicasting
1/33 Link Failure Recovery for MPLS Networks with Multicasting Master s Thesis Presentation August 12 th, 2002 Yvan Pointurier Advisor: Jörg Liebeherr Multimedia Networks Group Department of Computer Science
More informationNETWORK DEPLOYMENT WITH SEGMENT ROUTING (SPRING)
NETWORK DEPLOYMENT WITH SEGMENT ROUTING (SPRING) Aman Kapoor Director, Product Management This statement of direction sets forth Juniper Networks current intention and is subject to change at any time
More information