ENIAC JU, Private-Public Partnership in Nano-electronics. Helmut Ennen Advisor, ENIAC JU

Transcription

1 ENIAC JU, Private-Public Partnership in Nano-electronics Helmut Ennen Advisor, ENIAC JU ENF Workshop, Dublin, 20 June 2013

2 Content 1. Nanoelectronics: a KET 2. European 2012 Highlights 3. ENIAC JU Impact 4. Conclusion

3 Nanoelectronics: a KET The Structuring Concept: Key Enabling Technologies Nanotechnology Micro- and nanoelectronics, including semiconductors, are essential for all goods and services which need intelligent control in sectors as diverse as automotive and transportation, aeronautics and space. Smart industrial control systems permit more efficient management of electricity generation, storage, transport and consumption through intelligent electrical grids and devices; Photonics Advanced materials Biotechnology Advanced manufacturing Commission communication Preparing for our future: Developing a common strategy for key enabling technologies in the EU, Brussels, , COM(2009) 512

4 Nanoelectronics: a KET Nanoelectronics: the Smart of Everything Smartphone Smart Grid Smart Cities Smart Mobility Smart Governance. Smartanything!

5 Nanoelectronics: a KET Why is Nanoelectronics a KET? (KET: Key Enabling technology) Commodity? KET!

6 European 202 Highlights European 2012 Highlights STMicroelectronics: - FDSOI break-through - $1B in MEMS Infineon: 300mm power NXP: improves ranking 2 optoelectronics suppliers in Top 10 with solid organic growth Dialog ranked again #4, CSR #13 fastest growing fabless Four European pure-play specialty foundries ranked in Top 20 (none in Top 12) ASML keeps high ranking, #2 IC equipment manufacturer ARM showing steady progress Source: isupply, IC Insights, VLSI Research

7 ENIAC JU Impact Public Support Policies in Europe 1. National Programmes 2. Member States Collaborative Programmes, e.g. on Nanoelectronics Sharing the Vision, Mission, Strategy (CATRENE+AENEAS Contribution) EUREKA Cluster CATRENE o Funding: EU Member States, according to national procedures ENIAC Joint Undertaking o Funding: 2/3 ENIAC member States,1/3 ENIAC Joint Undertaking 3. European Commission o European Research Council o Framework Programme 7 (FP7) o Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) o European Institutes of Technology (EIT)

8 ENIAC JU Impact ENIAC JU Mission W(10) : The JTI on nanoelectronics should address two objectives - enhancing the further integration and miniaturization of devices, and - increasing their functionalities. It should deliver: - new materials - equipment - processes - new architectures - innovative manufacturing processes - disruptive design methodologies - new packaging and systemizing methods It should drive and be driven by innovative high-tech applications in the areas of - communication and computing - transport - health care and wellness - energy and environmental management - security and safety - entertainment. COUNCIL REGULATION No 72/2008 setting up the ENIAC Joint Undertaking

9 ENIAC JU Impact 3. Governance Union Body, Legal Personality, 4 Bodies: Governing Board AENEAS, Public Authorities Meetings chaired by IRC Chairperson Executive Director Secretariat Public Authorithies Board European Commission, ENIAC member States Industry and Research Committee Nominated by AENEAS Approves research agenda, budget ; provides general supervision Approves the Multi Annual Strategic Plan, the Annual Implementation Plan, the Rules of Procedure Ensures daily operations, legal representation Elaborates the Annual Implementation Plan, executes calls; monitors projects, proposes rules of procedure Approves annual implementation of research agenda, financing Approves the Annual Work Plan, Calls, Grants Defines research agenda Elaborates the Multi Annual Strategic Plan and the Annual Work Plan

10 ENIAC JU Impact 4. Role of Member States : ENIAC member States (EmS) Set the Pace Planned Cumulative Total Eligible Costs : ~ 3B 55% max

11 ENIAC JU Impact Subsidiarity The ENIAC JU is not: 1. A programme belonging to a centralized European institution: the majority stakeholders are the Industry defining the content and the ENIAC member States assigning the public funding 2. A competitor for resources: the national funding goes entirely and exclusively to the national beneficiaries, the ENIAC JU increases the public funding by adding European grants 3. A line in the budget of a national Ministry: any budget line supporting a project of national interest can be augmented through the ENIAC JU mechanism The ENIAC JU is a mechanism to increase investments in any national priority project funded through any national sources that can benefit from European collaboration

12 ENIAC JU Impact Increase in R&D Resources ( Additionality ) Full Time Equivalent researchers engaged in the projects

13 ENIAC JU Impact ENIAC Joint Undertaking Total Eligible Costs Distribution

14 ENIAC JU Impact 2012 : Pilot Line Projects Implementation in ENIAC JU Second Pillar Pilot Line Project Executed by an industrial consortium Using an innovative technology ENIAC JU compatibility Developing an innovative product, meeting a social challenge Demonstrating its value and potential Establishing a realistic environment, a facility Having a deployment plan to a real life European manufacturing site R&D Part

15 ENIAC JU Impact 2012 : ENIAC JU Pilot Line Projects Selected for Funding Mapped on the Innovation Chain <= 200mm Diversification: MEMS, Sensor.. EPPL: 75M PLACES2BE: 359M Lab4MEMS: 29M Customization: NVM, Power, RF AGATE: 60M Advanced Users: Communications Early Adopters: Microprocessors, Memories, Advanced Foundries Total Eligible Costs KET Pilot Lines: 728M Total 2012: 845 M 300mm E450PL: 206M Equipment, Materials 450mm

16 ENIAC JU Impact First Submissions in 2013 CALL Project Outline Eligible Cost (Pilot Lines) 15 TOTAL 28

17 CONCLUSION ENIAC JU: Demonstrated Ability to Induce Private Sector Involvement Good trend, but insufficient! To be continued and amplified in Horizon 2020!

18

19 Conclusions 1. Implementing the Key Enabling Technology concept resulted in strategic project proposals 2. Build up trust, gained stakeholder commitments increasing ENIAC JU projects 4.2x over 2 years 3. The Joint Undertaking was proven as flexible and fast: Pilot Line call executed under existing rules/regulations 99 days from project submission to funding decision 2012: 845 M total eligible R&D costs (728M Pilot Lines) 4. Public-Private Partnership on nanoelectronics to be improved and continued as JU in

20 Thank You for Your Attention!