Implementing and extending SPARQL queries over DLVHEX
|
|
- Eugenia Welch
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Implementing and extending SPARQL queries over DLVHEX Gennaro Frazzingaro Bachelor Thesis Presentation - October 5, 2007 From a work performed in Madrid, Spain Galway, Ireland Rende, Italy
2 How to solve problems arising Searching the Web Organize my journeys... Who can do this for me??
3 Making the Web more... Semantic Creating distributed knowledge: Shared distributed vocabularies (OWL, RDFS) Shared distributed information using these vocabularies How to store this information??
4 Making the Web more... Semantic Creating distributed knowledge: Shared distributed vocabularies (OWL, RDFS) Shared distributed information using these vocabularies How to store this information??
5 by the Resource Description Framework (RDF) = W3C standard from February 1999 Provides a framework to represent META-DATA about resources RDF model by TRIPLES subject - predicate - object
6 by the Resource Description Framework (RDF) = W3C standard from February 1999 Provides a framework to represent META-DATA about resources RDF model by TRIPLES subject - predicate - object
7 RDF representations (standard form) <rdf:rdf xmlns:rdf=" xmlns:contact=" <contact:person rdf:about=" <contact:fullname>eric Miller</contact:fullName> <contact:mailbox <contact:personaltitle>dr.</contact:personaltitle> </contact:person> </rdf:rdf> contact:fullname contact:personaltitle RDF/XML or Graph Data Model Eric Miller contact:mailbox Dr. Namespace contact="
8 RDF representations (more readable forms) subject - predicate - : < < :me contact:fullname Eric Miller :me contact:mailbox <mailto:em@w3.org> :me contact:personaltitle Dr. ^^xsd:string Notation 3 N-Triples Turtle just the syntax changes, not the content!
9 How to retrieve this information (what we need) A cross language for handling RDF s semi-structured data A language which allow higherlevel application development A platform-independent query language and which can retrieve triples from different data sources SQL-like languages Retrieve data from Databases composed of TRIPLES Simple and familiar SELECT form XQuery-like languages Retrieve data from XML (RDF/XML) Platform independent
10 How to retrieve this information (what we need) A cross language for handling RDF s semi-structured data A language which allow higherlevel application development A platform-independent query language and which can retrieve triples from different data sources SQL-like languages Retrieve data from Databases composed of TRIPLES Simple and familiar SELECT form XQuery-like languages Retrieve data from XML (RDF/XML) Platform independent
11 How to retrieve this information (what we need) A cross language for handling RDF s semi-structured data A language which allow higherlevel application development A platform-independent query language and which can retrieve triples from different data sources SQL-like languages Retrieve data from Databases composed of TRIPLES Simple and familiar SELECT form XQuery-like languages Retrieve data from XML (RDF/XML) Platform independent
12 How to retrieve this information (what we need) A cross language for handling RDF s semi-structured data A language which allow higherlevel application development A platform-independent query language and which can retrieve triples from different data sources SQL-like languages Retrieve data from Databases composed of TRIPLES Simple and familiar SELECT form XQuery-like languages Retrieve data from XML (RDF/XML) Platform independent ENCODING DEPENDENT
13 SPARQL is the W3C answer PREFIX (optional) SELECT FROM prefixes list of variables (* for all in the WHERE clause) default graph FROM NAMED named graphs WHERE (conjunction of patterns) pattern(s) SQL-like SELECT query form FROM and FROM NAMED to specify the data-sets Use of TRIPLE patterns written in TURTLE
14 SPARQL is the W3C answer PREFIX (optional) SELECT FROM prefixes list of variables (* for all in the WHERE clause) default graph FROM NAMED named graphs WHERE (conjunction of patterns) pattern(s) SQL-like SELECT query form FROM and FROM NAMED to specify the data-sets Use of TRIPLE patterns written in TURTLE
15 SPARQL is the W3C answer PREFIX (optional) SELECT FROM prefixes list of variables (* for all in the WHERE clause) default graph FROM NAMED named graphs WHERE (conjunction of patterns) pattern(s) SQL-like SELECT query form FROM and FROM NAMED to specify the data-sets Use of TRIPLE patterns written in TURTLE
16 How to solve these queries? Current approach: ARQ on Jena Jena is a Java API for Semantic Web applications (which supports RDQL answering) ARQ is a module for executing SPARQL queries translating them into RDQL RDQL is query language for extracting information from RDF graphs Our approach: SPARQL on DLVHEX DLVHEX is a framework which extends DLV to calculate answer-sets for HEX-programs HEX-programs are an extension of ASP-programs allowing external and higher-order atoms DLVHEX-SPARQL translate SPARQL queries into rules to calculate solutions
17 How to solve these queries? Current approach: ARQ on Jena Jena is a Java API for Semantic Web applications (which supports RDQL answering) ARQ is a module for executing SPARQL queries translating them into RDQL RDQL is query language for extracting information from RDF graphs Our approach: SPARQL on DLVHEX DLVHEX is a framework which extends DLV to calculate answer-sets for HEX-programs HEX-programs are an extension of ASP-programs allowing external and higher-order atoms DLVHEX-SPARQL translate SPARQL queries into rules to calculate solutions
18 HEX-programs A rule r is of the form α1... αk β1,...,βn, not βn+1,...,not βm where m, k >= 0 α1...αk are atoms β1...βm are either atoms or external atoms An external atom is of the form &g[y1,...,yn](x1,...xm) where &g is the external predicate name Y1,...,Yn are the input list of term X1,...,Xm are the output list of term A HEX-program is a finite set P of r rules
19 HEX-programs A rule r is of the form α1... αk β1,...,βn, not βn+1,...,not βm where m, k >= 0 α1...αk are atoms β1...βm are either atoms or external atoms An external atom is of the form &g[y1,...,yn](x1,...xm) where &g is the external predicate name Y1,...,Yn are the input list of term X1,...,Xm are the output list of term A HEX-program is a finite set P of r rules
20 HEX-programs A rule r is of the form α1... αk β1,...,βn, not βn+1,...,not βm where m, k >= 0 α1...αk are atoms β1...βm are either atoms or external atoms An external atom is of the form &g[y1,...,yn](x1,...xm) where &g is the external predicate name Y1,...,Yn are the input list of term X1,...,Xm are the output list of term A HEX-program is a finite set P of r rules
21 HEX Semantics HBP is the Herbrand Base of such a program P, a set of all possible ground version of atoms and HEX-atoms occurring in P Given an interpretation I relative to P, I is a model of atom a in HBP, if a is in I. f&g is a boolean function assigning each tuple (I, y1..., yn, x1,..., xm) either 0 or 1 I is a model of a ground external atom a=&g[y1..., yn](x1,..., xm) if and only if f&g(i, y1..., yn, x1,..., xm) = 1
22 How does it work? What DLVHEX needs: Import data from RDF graphs Store it into predicates to allow its evaluation Restrict solutions to those that match with the pattern in the WHERE clause What DLVHEX provides: External atom (RDF-plugin) &rdf[uri](s,p,o) to read triples from URI Infer predicates from this atom triple(s,p,o) :- &rdf[uri](s,p,o) Rewriting of the input (SPARQL) in its equivalent program in rules (SPARQL-plugin)
23 How does it work? What DLVHEX needs: Import data from RDF graphs Store it into predicates to allow its evaluation Restrict solutions to those that match with the pattern in the WHERE clause What DLVHEX provides: External atom (RDF-plugin) &rdf[uri](s,p,o) to read triples from URI Infer predicates from this atom triple(s,p,o) :- &rdf[uri](s,p,o) Rewriting of the input (SPARQL) in its equivalent program in rules (SPARQL-plugin)
24 SPARQL translation Conjuction and disjunction PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?N FROM < WHERE {?X a foaf:person. { {?X foaf:name?n } UNION {?X foaf:nick?n } } } QUERY foaf: alice: bob: < :bob a foaf:person; foaf:name "Bob"; foaf:nick "Bobby". alice:me foaf:knows _:c. _:c a foaf:person foaf:nick "Bob" ; foaf:nick "Bobby". RESULT?N "Bobby" "Bob" "Bobby" "Bob"
25 SPARQL translation Matching Alternatives PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?N FROM < WHERE {?X a foaf:person. { {?X foaf:name?n } UNION {?X foaf:nick?n } } } becomes answervars("n"). triple(s,p,o,default) :- &rdf[" answer_1(x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:nick",x_n,default). answer(x_x) :- answer_1(x_x,default),answer_2(x_n,x_x,default).
26 SPARQL translation Matching Alternatives PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?N FROM < WHERE {?X a foaf:person. { {?X foaf:name?n } UNION {?X foaf:nick?n } } } becomes answervars("n"). triple(s,p,o,default) :- &rdf[" answer_1(x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:nick",x_n,default). answer(x_x) :- answer_1(x_x,default),answer_2(x_n,x_x,default).
27 SPARQL translation Matching Alternatives PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?N FROM < WHERE {?X a foaf:person. { {?X foaf:name?n } UNION {?X foaf:nick?n } } } becomes answervars("n"). triple(s,p,o,default) :- &rdf[" answer_1(x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:nick",x_n,default). answer(x_x) :- answer_1(x_x,default),answer_2(x_n,x_x,default).
28 SPARQL translation Matching Alternatives PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?N FROM < WHERE {?X a foaf:person. { {?X foaf:name?n } UNION {?X foaf:nick?n } } } becomes answervars("n"). triple(s,p,o,default) :- &rdf[" answer_1(x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:nick",x_n,default). answer(x_x) :- answer_1(x_x,default),answer_2(x_n,x_x,default).
29 SPARQL translation Matching Alternatives PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?N FROM < WHERE {?X a foaf:person. { {?X foaf:name?n } UNION {?X foaf:nick?n } } } becomes answervars("n"). triple(s,p,o,default) :- &rdf[" answer_1(x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:nick",x_n,default). answer(x_x) :- answer_1(x_x,default),answer_2(x_n,x_x,default).
30 SPARQL translation Matching Alternatives PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?N FROM < WHERE {?X a foaf:person. { {?X foaf:name?n } UNION {?X foaf:nick?n } } } becomes answervars("n"). triple(s,p,o,default) :- &rdf[" answer_1(x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:nick",x_n,default). answer(x_x) :- answer_1(x_x,default),answer_2(x_n,x_x,default).
31 SPARQL translation Matching Alternatives answervars("x"). triple(s,p,o,default) :- &rdf[" answer_1(x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_2(x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:nick",x_n,default). answer(x_x) :- answer_1(x_x,default),answer_2(x_n,x_x,default). whose solution is which corresponds to {answer("'bobby'"), answer("'bob'")} RESULT?N "Bobby" "Bob"
32 Drawbacks of current translation SPARQL on DLVHEX is not fully compliant with the specifications described by W3C: Just plain RDF literals are supported (not datatyped) Solution modifier not supported Every query is solved as a DISTINCT query (if a binding appears more than once in the solution, DLVHEX shows it just once, like in the example above) Evaluation of FILTERs is still sloppy and often not yet supported.
33 Specific starting point of my thesis Enable both DISTINCT and not DISTINCT queries (showing, in the latter case, the results the same times they are matched in the graph) Complete evaluation of FILTERs
34 How to distinguish bindings Inserting an identifier (constant) for each branch of UNION propagated upwards by a variable Always carrying over all the variables in all subpatterns to the answer predicate answervars("","n",""). triple(s,p,o,default) :- &rdf[" answer_1(x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(union_2_1,x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_2(union_2_2,x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:nick",x_n,default). answer(union_2,x_n,x_x) :- answer_1(x_x,default), answer_2(union_2,x_n,x_x,default).
35 How to distinguish bindings Inserting an identifier (constant) for each branch of UNION propagated upwards by a variable Always carrying over all the variables in all subpatterns to the answer predicate answervars("","n",""). triple(s,p,o,default) :- &rdf[" answer_1(x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(union_2_1,x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_2(union_2_2,x_n,x_x,default) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:nick",x_n,default). answer(union_2,x_n,x_x) :- answer_1(x_x,default), answer_2(union_2,x_n,x_x,default).
36 Now the solution is... {answer(union_2_2,"'bobby'","#genid_< answer(union_2_2,"'bobby'","< answer(union_2_2,"'bob'","#genid_< answer(union_2_1,"'bob'","< which corresponds to real result RESULT?N "Bobby" "Bobby" "Bob" "Bob"
37 FILTERs evaluation What is a FILTER FILTERs restrict solutions to those for which the filter expression evaluates to TRUE Once values of a solution are substituted in the constraint expression, are discarded solution that either FILTER pattern produces FALSE ( F ) or produce an error ( E ). How we implemented it Use of external atoms for external computation of FILTER constraints We provide an external atom &eval which takes: The string following the FILTER keyword The value of the (possible) variable values to evaluate the constraint
38 FILTERs evaluation What is a FILTER FILTERs restrict solutions to those for which the filter expression evaluates to TRUE Once values of a solution are substituted in the constraint expression, are discarded solution that either FILTER pattern produces FALSE ( F ) or produce an error ( E ). How we implemented it Use of external atoms for external computation of FILTER constraints We provide an external atom &eval which takes: The string following the FILTER keyword The value of the (possible) variable values to evaluate the constraint
39 FILTERs evaluation What is a FILTER FILTERs restrict solutions to those for which the filter expression evaluates to TRUE Once values of a solution are substituted in the constraint expression, are discarded solution that either FILTER pattern produces FALSE ( F ) or produce an error ( E ). How we implemented it Use of external atoms for external computation of FILTER constraints We provide an external atom &eval which takes: The string following the FILTER keyword The value of the (possible) variable values to evaluate the constraint
40 FILTERs evaluation when we encounter for example In a nutshell WHERE... <patterns> FILTER <constraint>... we will use the external atom &eval["<constraint>",<variables value in the constraint>](x). where X could be "T", "F" or "E"
41 FILTERs evaluation PREFIX foaf: < SELECT?name?mbox WHERE {?x foaf:name?name ; foaf:mbox?mbox. FILTER ( lang(?name) = "ES" && isiri(?mbox) ) } becomes answervars("mbox","name",""). answer(x_mbox,x_name,x_x) :- triple(x_x,"foaf:mbox",x_mbox,default), triple(x_x,"foaf:name",x_name,default), &eval["lang(?name) = \"ES\" && isiri(?mbox)",x_name,x_mbox]("t").
42 Particular case: FILTER + OPTIONAL (1) WHERE... <patterns> OPTIONAL <pattern>... Queries which contains OPTIONAL patterns do not reject solutions which has no binding for <pattern>. OPTIONAL patterns in SPARQL corresponds to the left join operator in Relational Algebra. Given the patterns Ω1 = <patterns> and Ω2 = <pattern> they could be transformed following the left join definition as follows Ω1 leftjoin Ω2 = (Ω1 join Ω2) U (Ω1 - Ω2)
43 Particular case: FILTER + OPTIONAL (2) OPTIONAL <pattern> FILTER <constraint> When a FILTER constraint appears in an OPTIONAL pattern there are 3 cases to consider: 1. there are bindings for <pattern> and <constraint> is true 2. there are bindings for <pattern>, but <constraint> is false or generate an error 3. there are no bindings for <pattern>
44 SPARQL translation Optional Patterns PREFIX foaf: < SELECT * FROM < WHERE { {?X1 a foaf:person. OPTIONAL {?X1 foaf:name?n. FILTER isliteral(?n) } } becomes answer_1(x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_bjoin_1(null,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), not answer_2_prime(x_x1,default). answer_2_prime(x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), not &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer(x_n,x_x1) :- answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default).
45 SPARQL translation Optional Patterns PREFIX foaf: < SELECT * FROM < WHERE { {?X1 a foaf:person. OPTIONAL {?X1 foaf:name?n. FILTER isliteral(?n) } } becomes answer_1(x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_bjoin_1(null,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), not answer_2_prime(x_x1,default). answer_2_prime(x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), not &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer(x_n,x_x1) :- answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default).
46 SPARQL translation Optional Patterns {?X1 a foaf:person. OPTIONAL {?X1 foaf:name?n. FILTER isliteral(?n) } } = Ω1 OPTIONAL Ω2 = (Ω1 join Ω2) U (Ω1 - Ω2) becomes FILTER is true generates an error answer_1(x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_bjoin_1(null,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), not answer_2_prime(x_x1,default). answer_2_prime(x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), not &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer(x_n,x_x1) :- answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default).
47 SPARQL translation Optional Patterns {?X1 a foaf:person. OPTIONAL {?X1 foaf:name?n. FILTER isliteral(?n) } } = Ω1 OPTIONAL Ω2 = (Ω1 join Ω2) U (Ω1 - Ω2) becomes FILTER is false or generates an error answer_1(x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_bjoin_1(null,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), not answer_2_prime(x_x1,default). answer_2_prime(x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), not &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer(x_n,x_x1) :- answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default).
48 SPARQL translation Optional Patterns Ω1 OPTIONAL Ω2 = (Ω1 join Ω2) U (Ω1 - Ω2) We need SAFETY! We need answer_2_prime to apply negation on answer_2 (Ω1 - Ω2) = Ω1 - (Ω1 Ω2) becomes answer_1(x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"< "foaf:person",default). answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default) :- triple(x_x1,"foaf:name",x_n,default). answer_bjoin_1(null,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), not answer_2_prime(x_x1,default). answer_2_prime(x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default) :- answer_1(x_x1,default), answer_2(x_n,x_x1,default), not &eval["isliteral(?n)",x_n]("t"). answer (X_N,X_X1) :- answer_bjoin_1(x_n,x_x1,default).
49 DLVHEX+SPARQL web service We provide also a web-service developed with Apache Axis, available at It evaluates queries using dlvhex-sparql and its RuleML output It transforms this output in the official SPARQL Query Result XML format
50 Thanks. Questions?
Chapter 13: Advanced topic 3 Web 3.0
Chapter 13: Advanced topic 3 Web 3.0 Contents Web 3.0 Metadata RDF SPARQL OWL Web 3.0 Web 1.0 Website publish information, user read it Ex: Web 2.0 User create content: post information, modify, delete
More informationWhat's New in RDF 1.1
What's New in RDF 1.1 SemTechBiz June 2013 http://www.w3.org/2013/talks/0603-rdf11 Sandro Hawke, W3C Staff sandro@w3.org @sandhawke Overview 1. Stability and Interoperability 2. Non-XML Syntaxes Turtle
More informationCOMPUTER AND INFORMATION SCIENCE JENA DB. Group Abhishek Kumar Harshvardhan Singh Abhisek Mohanty Suhas Tumkur Chandrashekhara
JENA DB Group - 10 Abhishek Kumar Harshvardhan Singh Abhisek Mohanty Suhas Tumkur Chandrashekhara OUTLINE Introduction Data Model Query Language Implementation Features Applications Introduction Open Source
More informationWeb 3.0 Overview: Interoperability in the Web dimension (1) Web 3.0 Overview: Interoperability in the Web dimension (2) Metadata
Information Network I Web 3.0 Youki Kadobayashi NAIST Web 3.0 Overview: Interoperability in the Web dimension (1) Interoperability of data: Assist in interacting with arbitrary (including unknown) resources
More informationInformation Network I Web 3.0. Youki Kadobayashi NAIST
Information Network I Web 3.0 Youki Kadobayashi NAIST Web 3.0 Overview: Interoperability in the Web dimension (1) Interoperability of data: Metadata Data about data Assist in interacting with arbitrary
More informationDescriptions. Robert Grimm New York University
Descriptions Robert Grimm New York University The Final Assignment! Your own application! Discussion board! Think: Paper summaries! Time tracker! Think: Productivity tracking! Web cam proxy! Think: George
More informationFrom the Web to the Semantic Web: RDF and RDF Schema
From the Web to the Semantic Web: RDF and RDF Schema Languages for web Master s Degree Course in Computer Engineering - (A.Y. 2016/2017) The Semantic Web [Berners-Lee et al., Scientific American, 2001]
More informationRDF AND SPARQL. Part IV: Syntax of SPARQL. Dresden, August Sebastian Rudolph ICCL Summer School
RDF AND SPARQL Part IV: Syntax of SPARQL Sebastian Rudolph ICCL Summer School Dresden, August 2013 Agenda 1 Introduction and Motivation 2 Simple SPARQL Queries 3 Complex Graph Pattern 4 Filters 5 Solution
More informationQuerying Semantic Web Data
Querying Semantic Web Data Lalana Kagal Decentralized Information Group MIT CSAIL Eric Prud'hommeaux Sanitation Engineer World Wide Web Consortium SPARQL Program Graph patterns Motivations for RDF RDF
More informationDescriptions. Robert Grimm New York University
Descriptions Robert Grimm New York University The Final Assignment! Your own application! Discussion board! Think: Paper summaries! Web cam proxy! Think: George Orwell or JenCam! Visitor announcement and
More informationLars Schmidt-Thieme, Information Systems and Machine Learning Lab (ISMLL), University of Hildesheim, Germany, Course on XML and Semantic Web
Course on XML and Semantic Web Technologies, summer term 2012 0/45 XML and Semantic Web Technologies XML and Semantic Web Technologies II. Semantic Web / 3. SPARQL Query Language for RDF Lars Schmidt-Thieme
More informationSPARQL. Dr Nicholas Gibbins
SPARQL Dr Nicholas Gibbins nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk Semantic Web Applications Technologies considered so far allow us to create representation schemes (RDFS, OWL) and to represent data (RDF) We can put data
More informationA Rule System for Querying Persistent RDFS Data
A Rule System for Querying Persistent RDFS Data Giovambattista Ianni 1, Thomas Krennwallner 2, Alessandra Martello 1, and Axel Polleres 3 1 Dipartimento di Matematica, Università della Calabria, I-87036
More informationUnit 1 a Bird s Eye View on RDF(S), OWL & SPARQL
Unit 1 a Bird s Eye View on RDF(S), OWL & SPARQL Axel Polleres Siemens AG Österreich VU 184.729 Semantic Web Technologies A. Polleres VU 184.729 1/48 Unit Outline 1. Motivation Aggregating Web Data 2.
More informationBASI DI DATI II 2 modulo Parte VIII: SPARQL
BASI DI DATI II 2 modulo Parte VIII: SPARQL Prof. Riccardo Torlone Università Roma Tre Outline Querying RDF SPARQL Query Languages: SQL A language for querying collections of tuples: SELECT SALARY, HIRE_DATE
More informationXML and Semantic Web Technologies. III. Semantic Web / 3. SPARQL Query Language for RDF
XML and Semantic Web Technologies XML and Semantic Web Technologies III. Semantic Web / 3. SPARQL Query Language for RDF Lars Schmidt-Thieme Information Systems and Machine Learning Lab (ISMLL) Institute
More informationRESOURCES DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK: RDF
1 RESOURCES DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK: RDF Hala Skaf-Molli Associate Professor Nantes University Hala.Skaf@univ-nantes.fr http://pagesperso.lina.univ-nantes.fr/~skaf-h Linked Data Stack (Semantic Web Cake)
More informationSemantic Web Tools. Federico Chesani 18 Febbraio 2010
Semantic Web Tools Federico Chesani 18 Febbraio 2010 Outline A unique way for identifying concepts How to uniquely identified concepts? -> by means of a name system... SW exploits an already available
More informationSPARQL QUERY LANGUAGE WEB:
SPARQL QUERY LANGUAGE JELENA JOVANOVIC EMAIL: JELJOV@GMAIL.COM WEB: HTTP://JELENAJOVANOVIC.NET SPARQL query language W3C standard for querying RDF graphs Can be used to query not only native RDF data,
More informationSemantic Web Systems Querying Jacques Fleuriot School of Informatics
Semantic Web Systems Querying Jacques Fleuriot School of Informatics 5 th February 2015 In the previous lecture l Serialising RDF in XML RDF Triples with literal Object edstaff:9888 foaf:name Ewan Klein.
More informationNested Queries in SPARQL
Nested Queries in SPARQL Renzo Angles Claudio Gutierrez Presented by: Nuno Lopes Stefan.Decker@deri.org http://www.stefandecker.org/! Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. Motivation for nested queries
More informationProcessing SparQL Queries in an Object-Oriented Mediator
1-47 Uppsala Master s Theses in Computer Science 306 2007-01-07 ISSN 1100-1836 Processing SparQL Queries in an Object-Oriented Mediator Yu Cao Information Technology Computing Science Department Uppsala
More informationSemantics. Matthew J. Graham CACR. Methods of Computational Science Caltech, 2011 May 10. matthew graham
Semantics Matthew J. Graham CACR Methods of Computational Science Caltech, 2011 May 10 semantic web The future of the Internet (Web 3.0) Decentralized platform for distributed knowledge A web of databases
More informationQuerying RDF & RDFS. Several query languages exist to retrieve
Knowledge management: Querying with SPARQL 1 Querying RDF & RDFS Several query languages exist to retrieve resulting triples from RDF RDQL SERQL SPARQL These languages use triple patterns as input and
More informationSPARQL. Fausto Giunchiglia and Mattia Fumagallli. University of Trento
SPARQL Fausto Giunchiglia and Mattia Fumagallli University of Trento Roadmap Introduction Basic query forms SELECT CONSTRUCT ASK DESCRIBE Other clauses and modifiers SPARQL Federated Query Exercises 2
More informationMI-PDB, MIE-PDB: Advanced Database Systems
MI-PDB, MIE-PDB: Advanced Database Systems http://www.ksi.mff.cuni.cz/~svoboda/courses/2015-2-mie-pdb/ Lecture 11: RDF, SPARQL 3. 5. 2016 Lecturer: Martin Svoboda svoboda@ksi.mff.cuni.cz Author: Martin
More informationOrchestrating Music Queries via the Semantic Web
Orchestrating Music Queries via the Semantic Web Milos Vukicevic, John Galletly American University in Bulgaria Blagoevgrad 2700 Bulgaria +359 73 888 466 milossmi@gmail.com, jgalletly@aubg.bg Abstract
More informationSEMANTIC WEB 07 SPARQL TUTORIAL BY EXAMPLE: DBPEDIA IMRAN IHSAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, AIR UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD
SEMANTIC WEB 07 SPARQL TUTORIAL BY EXAMPLE: DBPEDIA IMRAN IHSAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, AIR UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD WWW.IMRANIHSAN.COM VIRTUOSO SERVER DOWNLOAD Open Link Virtuoso Server http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/dataspace/doc/dav/wiki/main/vosdownload
More informationSemantic Web Information Management
Semantic Web Information Management Norberto Fernández ndez Telematics Engineering Department berto@ it.uc3m.es.es 1 Motivation n Module 1: An ontology models a domain of knowledge n Module 2: using the
More informationMulti-agent and Semantic Web Systems: Querying
Multi-agent and Semantic Web Systems: Querying Fiona McNeill School of Informatics 11th February 2013 Fiona McNeill Multi-agent Semantic Web Systems: Querying 11th February 2013 0/30 Contents This lecture
More informationJena.
Jena http://openjena.org/ The Beginning... From: McBride, Brian Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 13:40:03 +0100 To: "RDF Interest (E-mail)" A few weeks ago I posted
More informationDay 2. RISIS Linked Data Course
Day 2 RISIS Linked Data Course Overview of the Course: Friday 9:00-9:15 Coffee 9:15-9:45 Introduction & Reflection 10:30-11:30 SPARQL Query Language 11:30-11:45 Coffee 11:45-12:30 SPARQL Hands-on 12:30-13:30
More informationUsing SPARQL with RDFS and OWL Entailment
Using SPARQL with RDFS and OWL Entailment Birte Glimm The University of Oxford, Department of Computer Science, UK Abstract. This chapter accompanies the lecture on SPARQL with entailment regimes at the
More informationSemantic Web. Querying on the Web: XQuery, RDQL, SparQL. Morteza Amini. Sharif University of Technology Fall 94-95
ه عا ی Semantic Web Querying on the Web: XQuery, RDQL, SparQL Morteza Amini Sharif University of Technology Fall 94-95 Outline XQuery Querying on XML Data RDQL Querying on RDF Data SparQL Another RDF query
More informationRDF and RDF Schema. Resource Description Framework
RDF and RDF Schema Resource Description Framework Outline RDF Design objectives RDF General structure RDF Vocabularies Serialization: XML Semantic features RDF Schema RDF Semantics and Reasoning 2019-01-14
More informationUnit 2 RDF Formal Semantics in Detail
Unit 2 RDF Formal Semantics in Detail Axel Polleres Siemens AG Österreich VU 184.729 Semantic Web Technologies A. Polleres VU 184.729 1/41 Where are we? Last time we learnt: Basic ideas about RDF and how
More informationSemantic Web Technologies: Assignment 1. Axel Polleres Siemens AG Österreich
Semantic Web Technologies: Assignment 1 Siemens AG Österreich 1 The assignment: 2 FOAF: 1. Create your own FOAF file. You can use a generator tool such as FOAF- a- Ma>c to generate a skeleton. 2. Make
More information3. Queries Applied Artificial Intelligence Prof. Dr. Bernhard Humm Faculty of Computer Science Hochschule Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences
3. Queries Applied Artificial Intelligence Prof. Dr. Bernhard Humm Faculty of Computer Science Hochschule Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences 1 Retrospective Knowledge Representation (1/2) What is
More informationSemantic Days 2011 Tutorial Semantic Web Technologies
Semantic Days 2011 Tutorial Semantic Web Technologies Lecture 2: RDF, The Resource Description Framework Martin Giese 7th June 2011 Department of Informatics University of Oslo Outline 1 The RDF data model
More informationLinked Data: What Now? Maine Library Association 2017
Linked Data: What Now? Maine Library Association 2017 Linked Data What is Linked Data Linked Data refers to a set of best practices for publishing and connecting structured data on the Web. URIs - Uniform
More informationSPAR-QL. Mario Arrigoni Neri
SPAR-QL Mario Arrigoni Neri 1 Introduction 2 SPARQL = SPARQL Protocol and RDF Query Language SPARQL - query language to manipulate information in RDF graphs. It provides support to: extract information
More informationSemantic Web and Python Concepts to Application development
PyCon 2009 IISc, Bangalore, India Semantic Web and Python Concepts to Application development Vinay Modi Voice Pitara Technologies Private Limited Outline Web Need better web for the future Knowledge Representation
More informationChapter 3 Querying RDF stores with SPARQL
Chapter 3 Querying RDF stores with SPARQL Why an RDF Query Language? l Why not use an XML query language? l XML at a lower level of abstraction than RDF l There are various ways of syntactically representing
More informationBuilding Blocks of Linked Data
Building Blocks of Linked Data Technological foundations Identifiers: URIs Data Model: RDF Terminology and Semantics: RDFS, OWL 23,019,148 People s Republic of China 20,693,000 population located in capital
More informationQuerying the Semantic Web
Querying the Semantic Web CSE 595 Semantic Web Instructor: Dr. Paul Fodor Stony Brook University http://www3.cs.stonybrook.edu/~pfodor/courses/cse595.html Lecture Outline SPARQL Infrastructure Basics:
More informationSemantic Web. Lecture 12: SW Programming Dr. Knarig Arabshian
Semantic Web Lecture 12: SW Programming Dr. Knarig Arabshian Knarig.arabshian@hofstra.edu Hello Semantic Web World Example Say hello to the Semantic Web Say hello to some friends of the Semantic Web Expand
More informationQuery. Ewan Klein. MASWS 12 February Multi-agent Semantic Web Systems: Query. Ewan Klein. Outline. Introduction RSS.
ing with ing with MASWS 12 February 2008 1 ing with ing with 2 3 ing with 4 ing with 5 ing RDF Data ing is crucial to being able to use RDF data. ing with ing with ing RDF Data ing with ing is crucial
More informationIntroducing Linked Data
Introducing Linked Data (Part of this work was funded by PlanetData NoE FP7/2007-2013) Irini Fundulaki 1 1 Institute of Computer Science FORTH & W3C Greece Office Manager EICOS : 4th Meeting, Athens, Greece
More informationOn the Semantics of Heterogeneous Querying of Relational, XML and RDF Data with XSPARQL
On the Semantics of Heterogeneous Querying of Relational, XML and RDF Data with XSPARQL Nuno Lopes, Stefan Bischof, Stefan Decker, Axel Polleres Stefan.Decker@deri.org http://www.stefandecker.org/! Copyright
More informationCHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Most of today s Web content is intended for the use of humans rather than machines. While searching documents on the Web using computers, human interpretation is required before
More informationFormalising the Semantic Web. (These slides have been written by Axel Polleres, WU Vienna)
Formalising the Semantic Web (These slides have been written by Axel Polleres, WU Vienna) The Semantics of RDF graphs Consider the following RDF data (written in Turtle): @prefix rdfs: .
More informationToday s Plan. 1 Repetition: RDF. 2 Jena: Basic Datastructures. 3 Jena: Inspecting Models. 4 Jena: I/O. 5 Example. 6 Jena: ModelFactory and ModelMaker
Today s Plan INF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2015 Lecture 3: Jena A Java Library for RDF Martin Giese 2nd February 2015 2 Department of Informatics University of Oslo INF3580/4580 :: Spring 2015
More informationBUILDING THE SEMANTIC WEB
BUILDING THE SEMANTIC WEB You might have come across the term Semantic Web Applications often, during talks about the future of Web apps. Check out what this is all about There are two aspects to the possible
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES
FOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES Semantics of SPARQL Sebastian Rudolph Dresden, June 14 Content Overview & XML 9 APR DS2 Hypertableau II 7 JUN DS5 Introduction into RDF 9 APR DS3 Tutorial 5 11
More informationJENA: A Java API for Ontology Management
JENA: A Java API for Ontology Management Hari Rajagopal IBM Corporation Page Agenda Background Intro to JENA Case study Tools and methods Questions Page The State of the Web Today The web is more Syntactic
More informationContents. G52IWS: The Semantic Web. The Semantic Web. Semantic web elements. Semantic Web technologies. Semantic Web Services
Contents G52IWS: The Semantic Web Chris Greenhalgh 2007-11-10 Introduction to the Semantic Web Semantic Web technologies Overview RDF OWL Semantic Web Services Concluding comments 1 See Developing Semantic
More informationINF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2015
INF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2015 Lecture 15: RDFa Martin Giese 11th May 2015 Department of Informatics University of Oslo Repetition 18 June: Guest lecture, Lars Marius Garshol 25 May: no
More informationRuleML and SWRL, Proof and Trust
RuleML and SWRL, Proof and Trust Semantic Web F. Abel and D. Krause IVS Semantic Web Group January 17, 2008 1 Solution 1: RuleML Express the following RuleML code as a human-readable First Order Logic
More informationThe Semantic Web Revisited. Nigel Shadbolt Tim Berners-Lee Wendy Hall
The Semantic Web Revisited Nigel Shadbolt Tim Berners-Lee Wendy Hall Today sweb It is designed for human consumption Information retrieval is mainly supported by keyword-based search engines Some problems
More informationPart II. Representation of Meta-Information
Part II Representation of Meta-Information 43 As we have seen in Chapter 3, quality-based information filtering policies rely on different types of meta-information about information itself, the information
More informationHarvesting RDF triples
Harvesting RDF triples Joe Futrelle Natioanl Center for Supercomputing Applications 1205 W. Clark St., Urbana IL 61801, US futrelle@ncsa.uiuc.edu Abstract. Managing scientific data requires tools that
More informationSPARQL Implementations
SPARQL Implementations SPARQL Implementations ARQ Complete, general purpose query system SPARQL Parser and serializer SPARQL Algebra SPARQL Execution Results handling SDB Specialised ARQ extension SPARQL
More informationReminder: RDF triples
Reminder: RDF triples The RDF data model is similar to classical conceptual modelling approaches such as entity relationship or class diagrams it is based on the idea of making statements about resources
More informationCopyright 2016 by Sahibi Miranshah. All Rights Reserved
ABSTRACT MIRANSHAH, SAHIBI. Integrating a Path Operator in Apache Jena for Generalized Graph Pattern Matching. (Under the direction of Dr. Kemafor Anyanwu Ogan.) The emergence of large heterogeneous networks
More informationSPARQL: An RDF Query Language
SPARQL: An RDF Query Language Wiltrud Kessler Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung Universität Stuttgart Semantic Web Winter 2015/16 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
More informationToday s Plan. INF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring Reminder: RDF triples. Outline. Lecture 4: The SPARQL Query Language.
Today s Plan INF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2015 Lecture 4: The SPARQL Query Language Kjetil Kjernsmo 9th February 2015 4 Department of Informatics University of Oslo INF3580/4580 :: Spring
More informationProcessing ontology alignments with SPARQL
Provided by the author(s) and NUI Galway in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite the published version when available. Title Processing ontology alignments with SPARQL Author(s) Polleres, Axel
More informationConstraint Solving. Systems and Internet Infrastructure Security
Systems and Internet Infrastructure Security Network and Security Research Center Department of Computer Science and Engineering Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA Constraint Solving Systems
More informationApache Jena Framework. Philippe Genoud Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble (France)
Apache Jena Framework Philippe Genoud Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble (France) (Philippe.Genoud@imag.fr) Astrakhan State University November 2012 1 What is Jena? Introduction An open source semantic
More informationDesigning a self-medication application on Semantic Web technologies. Olivier Curé UPEM LIGM, France
Designing a self-medication application on Semantic Web technologies Olivier Curé UPEM LIGM, France Overview Self-medication applications Symptom & Drug DB Overview Self-medication applications Symptom
More informationToday s Plan. 1 Repetition: RDF. 2 Jena: Basic Datastructures. 3 Jena: Inspecting Models. 4 Jena: I/O. 5 Example. 6 Jena: ModelFactory and ModelMaker
Today s Plan INF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2017 Lecture 3: Jena A Java Library for RDF Martin Giese 30th January 2017 2 Department of Informatics University of Oslo INF3580/4580 :: Spring 2017
More informationWHY WE NEED AN XML STANDARD FOR REPRESENTING BUSINESS RULES. Introduction. Production rules. Christian de Sainte Marie ILOG
WHY WE NEED AN XML STANDARD FOR REPRESENTING BUSINESS RULES Christian de Sainte Marie ILOG Introduction We are interested in the topic of communicating policy decisions to other parties, and, more generally,
More informationWeb NDL Authorities SPARQL API Specication
Web NDL Authorities SPARQL API Specication National Diet Library of Japan March 31th, 2014 Contents 1 The Outline of the Web NDLA SPARQL API 2 1.1 SPARQL query API.................................... 2
More informationLibrary of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot. NOTSL Fall Meeting October 30, 2015
Library of Congress BIBFRAME Pilot NOTSL Fall Meeting October 30, 2015 THE BIBFRAME EDITOR AND THE LC PILOT The Semantic Web and Linked Data : a Recap of the Key Concepts Learning Objectives Describe the
More informationKNOWLEDGE GRAPHS. Lecture 4: Introduction to SPARQL. TU Dresden, 6th Nov Markus Krötzsch Knowledge-Based Systems
KNOWLEDGE GRAPHS Lecture 4: Introduction to SPARQL Markus Krötzsch Knowledge-Based Systems TU Dresden, 6th Nov 2018 Review We can use reification to encode complex structures in RDF graphs: Film Actor
More informationSPARQL Protocol And RDF Query Language
SPARQL Protocol And RDF Query Language WS 2011/12: XML Technologies John Julian Carstens Department of Computer Science Communication Systems Group Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel March 1, 2012
More informationInteracting with Linked Data Part I: General Introduction
Interacting with Linked Data Part I: General Introduction Agenda Part 0: Welcome Part I: General Introduction to Semantic Technologies Part II: Advanced Concepts Part III: OWLIM Part IV: Information Workbench-
More informationSemantic Web Engineering
Semantic Web Engineering Gerald Reif reif@ifi.unizh.ch Fr. 10:15-11:45, Room 2.A.10 The Resource Description Framework RDF Trust Proof Logic Ontology vocabulary RDF + RDF Schema XML + NS + XML Schema Unicode
More informationSemantic Web Fundamentals
Semantic Web Fundamentals Web Technologies (706.704) 3SSt VU WS 2017/18 Vedran Sabol with acknowledgements to P. Höfler, V. Pammer, W. Kienreich ISDS, TU Graz December 11 th 2017 Overview What is Semantic
More informationSemantic Web Fundamentals
Semantic Web Fundamentals Web Technologies (706.704) 3SSt VU WS 2018/19 with acknowledgements to P. Höfler, V. Pammer, W. Kienreich ISDS, TU Graz January 7 th 2019 Overview What is Semantic Web? Technology
More informationRDF & RDF QUERY LANGUAGES BUILDING BLOCKS FOR THE SEMANTIC WEB
RDF & RDF QUERY LANGUAGES BUILDING BLOCKS FOR THE SEMANTIC WEB Adam ALTĂR SAMUEL* 1 Alexandru COSTIN 2 Dragoș ENACHE 3 ABSTRACT Although the World Wide Web is a relatively new concept, its expansion and
More informationHarvesting RDF Triples
Harvesting RDF Triples Joe Futrelle National Center for Supercomputing Applications 1205 W. Clark St., Urbana IL 61801, US futrelle@uiuc.edu Abstract. Managing scientific data requires tools that can track
More informationSemantic Web and Linked Data
Semantic Web and Linked Data Petr Křemen December 2012 Contents Semantic Web Technologies Overview Linked Data Semantic Web Technologies Overview Semantic Web Technology Stack from Wikipedia. http://wikipedia.org/wiki/semantic_web,
More informationPackage rrdf. R topics documented: February 15, Type Package
Type Package Package rrdf February 15, 2013 Title rrdf - support for the Resource Framework Version 1.9.2 Date 2012-11-30 Author Maintainer Depends
More informationDC-Text - a simple text-based format for DC metadata
DC-Text - a simple text-based format for DC metadata Pete Johnston Eduserv Foundation Tel: +44 1225 474323 pete.johnston@eduserv.org.uk Andy Powell Eduserv Foundation Tel: +44 1225 474319 andy.powell@eduserv.org.uk
More informationCOMP20008 Elements of Data Processing. Week 1: Lecture 2. Data format and storage
COMP20008 Elements of Data Processing Week 1: Lecture 2 Data format and storage Announcements Lecture recordings Lecture Capture: Current Technical Issue. There are currently long delays in processing
More informationIntroduction to a Web of Linked Data
Introduction to a Web of Linked Data Week 3: SPARQL Query Language Accessing Data Sources on the Web Olivier Corby Week 3: SPARQL Query Language Query RDF triple stores published on the Web 1 Week 3: SPARQL
More informationIntroduction to Semantic Web Databases. Version 1 Prepared By: Amgad Madkour Ph.D. Candidate Purdue University April 2018
Introduction to Semantic Web Databases Version 1 Prepared By: Amgad Madkour Ph.D. Candidate Purdue University April 2018 Semantic Web Motivation Represents the next generation of the the world wide web
More informationFilter: Evaluable Expression. List Syntax. Tests. Filter: Evaluable Expression. Tests : functions. Tests 06/09/2013. (1?x v )
SPARQL 2 W3C RDF Data Access SPARQL W3C Simple Protocol And RDF Query Language olivier.corby@inria.fr Use Case and Requirements : http://www.w3.org/tr/rdf-dawg-uc Query language : http://www.w3.org/tr/rdf-sparql-query
More informationBIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS AND THE SEMANTIC WEB
BIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS AND THE SEMANTIC WEB Andra Waagmeester, Tina Kutmon, Egon Willighagen, and Alex Pico Univ. Maastricht, NL, and Gladstone Institutes, CA, USA What we will talk about today Introduc*on
More informationMaking BioPAX SPARQL
Making BioPAX SPARQL hands on... start a terminal create a directory jena_workspace, move into that directory download jena.jar (http://tinyurl.com/3vlp7rw) download biopax data (http://www.biopax.org/junk/homosapiens.nt
More informationQuang Vu DANG. Computer Science Department Institut Telecom SudParis
Visualizing contributions in a forge Case study on PicoForge Quang Vu DANG Computer Science Department Institut Telecom SudParis Plan Introduction Semantic Web standards Visualizing contributions in a
More informationO N T O P E D I A. The Identity of Everything. Subject Identity. Steve Pepper. INF5909,
Subject Identity Steve Pepper pepper.steve@gmail.com INF5909, 2009-02-23 Agenda Merging in Topic Maps The Importance of Identity The Topic Maps Approach to Identity The Identity Crisis of the Web Published
More informationMustafa Jarrar: Lecture Notes on RDF Schema Birzeit University, Version 3. RDFS RDF Schema. Mustafa Jarrar. Birzeit University
Mustafa Jarrar: Lecture Notes on RDF Schema Birzeit University, 2018 Version 3 RDFS RDF Schema Mustafa Jarrar Birzeit University 1 Watch this lecture and download the slides Course Page: http://www.jarrar.info/courses/ai/
More informationLogical reconstruction of RDF and ontology languages
Logical reconstruction of RDF and ontology languages Jos de Bruijn 1, Enrico Franconi 2, and Sergio Tessaris 2 1 Digital Enterprise Research Institute, University of Innsbruck, Austria jos.debruijn@deri.org
More informationD-RDF: Dynamic Resource Description Framework
Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 2007 D-RDF: Dynamic Resource Description Framework Kamna Jain Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the
More informationFlat triples approach to RDF graphs in JSON
Flat triples approach to RDF graphs in JSON Dominik Tomaszuk Institute of Computer Science, University of Bialystok, Poland Abstract. This paper describes a syntax that can be used to write Resource Description
More informationProgramming THE SEMANTIC WEB. Build an application upon Semantic Web models. Brief overview of Apache Jena and OWL-API.
Programming THE SEMANTIC WEB Build an application upon Semantic Web models. Brief overview of Apache Jena and OWL-API. Recap: Tools Editors (http://semanticweb.org/wiki/editors) Most common editor: Protégé
More informationA Deductive System for Annotated RDFS
A Deductive System for Annotated RDFS DERI Institute Meeting Umberto Straccia Nuno Lopes Gergely Lukácsy Antoine Zimmermann Axel Polleres Presented by: Nuno Lopes May 28, 2010 Annotated RDFS Example Annotated
More informationFinding Similarity and Comparability from Merged Hetero Data of the Semantic Web by Using Graph Pattern Matching
Finding Similarity and Comparability from Merged Hetero Data of the Semantic Web by Using Graph Pattern Matching Hiroyuki Sato, Kyoji Iiduka, Takeya Mukaigaito, and Takahiko Murayama Information Sharing
More information