Optimizing Flash-based Key-value Cache Systems

Transcription

1 Optimizing Flash-based Key-value Cache Systems Zhaoyan Shen, Feng Chen, Yichen Jia, Zili Shao Department of Computing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University Computer Science & Engineering, Louisiana State University The 8th USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Storage and File Systems (HotStorage 16)

2 Key-value Information Key-value access is dominant in web services Many apps simply store and retrieve key-value pairs Key-value cache is the first line of defense Benefits: Improve throughput, reduce latency, reduce server load In-memory KV cache is popular (Memcache) High speed but has cost, power, capacity problem 1

3 Flash based Key-value Cache Key-value cache Flash SSD + SHA-1(Key_1) Key (Slab, Slot) Slab Log-Structured Logical Flash Space Hash Index (Memory) Key-value Slabs (Flash LBA) In-memory hash map to track key-to-value mapping Slabs are used in a log-structured way Updated value item written to a new location and old values recycled later 2

4 Critical Issues Redundant mapping Double garbage collection Over-over-provisioning 3

5 Critical Issue 1: Redundant Mapping Critical Issues Redundant mapping at application- and FTL-level KVC: An in-memory hash table (Key Slab, Offset) FTL: An on-device page mapping table (LBA PBA) Problems Two mapping structures (unnecessarily) co-exist at two levels A significant waste of on-device DRAM space (e.g., 1GB for 1TB) The on-device DRAM buffer is costly, unreliable, and could be used for buffering. SHA-1(Key) K1 (1, 2) Hash table AAA,BBB BBB,CCC DDD,EEE Slab Space KVC software Mapping LBA Mapping Table AAA, BBB BBB,CCC DDD,EEE PBA FTL Mapping in hardware 4

6 Critical Issue 2: Double Garbage Collection Garbage collection (GC) at app- and FTL- levels KVC: Recycle deleted or changed key-value items FTL: Recycle trimmed or changed pages Problems Semantic validity of a key-value entry is not seen at FTL Redundant data copy operation Critical Issues SHA-1(Key) K1 AAA,BBB AAA,BBB BBB,CCC 0 BBB,CCC 1 DDD,EEE 2 DDD,EEE (1, (2, 2) 1) 3 AAA,BBB 4 5 Hash table KVC-level GC Slab Space LBA Mapping Table FTL-level GC BBB,CCC DDD,EEE PBA 5

7 Critical Issue 3: Over-over-provisioning Critical Issues Over-provisioning at FTL-level FTL has a portion (20-30%) of flash as Over-Provisioning Space (OPS) OPS space is invisible and unusable to the host applications Problems SHA-1(Key) OPS is reserved for dealing the worst-case situation, as a storage Over-over provisioning for Key-value caches Key-value caches are dominated by read (GET) traffic, not writes Key-value cache hit ratio is highly sensitive to usable cache size If 20-30% space can be released, the cache hit ratio can be greatly improved K1 (1, 2) Hash table AAA,BBB BBB,CCC DDD,EEE Slab Space LBA Mapping Table AAA,BBB BBB,CCC DDD,EEE FFF,GGG HHH,III JJJ, KKK Unusable PBA 6

8 Semantic Gap Problem Critical Issues Key-value cache Flash SSD Semantic Gap Fine-grained GC Key-to-value mapping Validity of slab entries Physical data layout on flash Direct flash memory control Proper mapping granularity In the current SW/HW architecture, we can do little to address these three issues. 7

9 Optimization Goals Redundant mapping Single mapping Double garbage collection App-driven GC Over-over-provisioning Dynamic OPS 8

10 Design Overview Key-value Cache K/V Mapping Key-value Cache Slab Mgm. Cache Mgm. Slab Manager Key/Slab Mapping KVC-driven GC Cache Manager OPS Management Page Cache Operating Systems I/O Scheduling Device Driver Bad Block Mgm. Library (libssd) Slab/Flash Translation Operation Conversion Garbage Collection Bad Block Mgm. Flash SSD Page Mapping Flash Operations Wear Leveling OPS Mgm. Page Cache Operating Systems I/O Scheduling Open-channel SSD Device Driver Flash Operations An enhanced flash-aware key-value cache A thin intermediate library layer (libssd) A specialized flash memory PCI-E SSD hardware 9

11 An Enhanced Flash-aware Key-value Cache Key-value Cache Slab management Unified direct mapping Garbage collection OPS management 10

12 Key-value Cache Slab Management Our choice Directly use a flash block as a slab (8MB) Slab buffer: An in-memory slab maintained for each class Parallelize and asynchronize the slab write I/Os to the flash memory Round-robin allocation of in-flash slab for load-balancing across channels Key/Value In-Memory Slab Buffer Class i Class i+1 Class i+2 Class n Flash SSD Channel #0 Channel #1 Channel #2 Channel #3 Channel #4 11

13 Unified Direct Mapping Key-value Cache Collapse multiple levels of indirect mapping to only one Prior mapping: Key Slab LBA PBA Current mapping: Key Slab (i.e., Flash Block) Benefits Removes the time overhead for lookup intermediate layers (Speed+) Only one single must-have in-memory hash table is needed (Cost-) On-device RAM space can be completely removed (or for other uses) SHA-1(Key) SHA-1(Key) K1 (1, 2) K1 (Slab, Offset) AAA,BBB BBB,CCC DDD,EEE Hash table Hash table Slab Space AAA,BBB BBB,CCC Slab #1 DDD,EEE0 CDC, CDC1 2 Slab #2 3 Mapping Flash Memory Table AAA,BBB BBB,CCC DDD,EEE Flash Memory 12

14 Key-value Cache App-driven Garbage Collection One single GC is driven directly by key-value cache system All slab writes are in units of blocks (no need for device-level GC) GC is directly triggered and controlled by application-level KVC Two GC policies Greedy GC: the least occupied slab is evicted to move minimum slots Quick clean: the LRU slab is immediately dropped recycling valid slots Adaptively used for different circumstances (busy or idle) AAA,BBB BBB,CCC DDD,EEE copy AAA,BBB BBB,CCC DDD,EEE 333, , , ,999 eee,fff ccc,ddd bbb,ccc aaa,bbb Victim Slab Target Slab LRU Slab MRU Slab Greedy GC Quick Clean 13

15 OPS Over-Provisioning Space Management Key-value Cache Dynamically tuning OPS space online Rationale KVC is typically read-intensive and OPS can be small Goal keep just enough OPS space (adaptive to intensity of writes) OPS management policies Heuristic method: An OPS window (W L and W H ) to estimate size Low watermark hit Trigger quick clean, raise the OPS window High watermark hit OPS is over-allocated, lower the OPS window Max OSP W H Time W L Quick clean initiated 14

16 Experiments Preliminary Experiments Implementation Key-value cache on Twitter s Fatcache to fit hardward Libssd Library (621 lines of code in C) Experimental Setup Intel Xeon E-1225, 32GB Memory, 1TB Disk, Open-Channel SSD Ubuntu LTS, Linux , Ext4 filesystem Hardware: Open-channel SSD A PCI-E based with 12 channel, and 192 LUNs Direct control to the device (via ioctl interface) 15

17 Experiments SET Throughput and Latency Our Scheme Our Scheme Stock Fatcache Stock Fatcache SET Workloads: 40milliom requests of 1KB key/value pairs Both set throughput/latency from our scheme are the best 16

18 Conclusion Conclusion KV stores become critical as they are one of the most important building blocks in modern web infrastructures and high-performance data-intensive applications. We build a highly efficient flash-based cache system which enables three benefits, namely a unified single-level direct mapping, a cache-driven fine-grained garbage collection, and an adaptive over-provisioning scheme We are implementing a prototype on the Open-Channel SSD hardware and our preliminary results show that it is highly promising 17

19 Thank You!

20 Backup Slides 19

21 GET Throughput and Latency Our Scheme Our Scheme Stock Fatcache Stock Fatcache GET performance is largely determined by the raw speed GET latencies are among the lowest in the set of SSDs 20

22 SET Latencies A Zoom-in View Our Scheme Stock Fatchche + KingSpec The direct control successfully removes high cost GC effects Quick clean removes long I/Os under high write pressure 21

23 Block Erase Count Erase Count Quick Clean kicks in SSDSim Open-channel SSD Trace collected with running Fatcache on Samsung SSD Block trace is replayed on MSR s SSD simulator for erase count Our solution reduces erase count by 30% 22

24 Effect of the In-memory Slab Buffer 10x buffer size difference does not affect latency significantly A small (56MB) in-memory slab buffer is sufficient for use 23