Automated real-time simulator testing of protection relays
|
|
- Herbert Osborne
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Automated real-time simulator testing of protection relays by B S Rigby, School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of KwaZulu-Natal This paper describes the results of a project to develop a proof-of-principle working example of automated hardware-inloop testing of protection schemes on an RTDS Technologiesreal-time simulator. The paper describes the test system configured to demonstrate automated closed-loop testing of the relays in a simple protection scheme, and presents the results of a typical set of such tests. The development of the script file to automate the tests is also discussed. A real-time digital simulator allows actual power system equipment, such as protection relays, to be connected in closed loop with a real-time simulation model for advanced testing [1]. This closed-loop arrangement enables detailed laboratory investigations into the performance of protection schemes to be carried out under highly-realistic conditions. For most types of real-time simulator testing of protection schemes, once the realtime model of the primary plant has been developed and tested, and the protection scheme connected to it, the actual simulation studies are conducted one at a time, with the investigator manually operating the real-time simulator and analysing the response of the scheme to a particular fault contingency. This type of approach is ideal, for example, for investigations where one is interested in recreating, and thereby explaining, the response of the protection relays to a particular contingency that has occurred in the field and to which the actual relays might have responded in an unexpected or undesirable manner. However, in some cases it may be desirable to use a real-time simulator to conduct investigations into the response of a protection scheme to a comprehensive range of fault scenarios, and for each fault scenario to consider different network topologies and system loading conditions. Out of recent collaborations between academia and industry has arisen the question of whether it would be possible to automate hardware-in-loop testing of relays on an RTDS Technologies real-time simulator, so as to run multiple contingency studies on a protection scheme and save the results for later off-line analysis. The RTDS environment does provide a facility for automated repeat testing [2], but in order to make use of this facility the user has to write a script file to carry out the automation in a C-like programming language. This paper describes the results of a project to develop a proof- of-principle working example of such automated testing involving actual hardwarein-loop protection relays. The paper describes the test system configured to demonstrate automated closed-loop testing of relays using the RTDS, and presents the results of a typical set of such tests. The development of the script file to automate the relay tests is also discussed. Study system Fig. 1 shows a single-line diagram of the electrical network model developed on the real-time simulator to serve as the study system for automated relay testing. The system comprises two parallel 400 kv lines fed from sources behind system impedances at each end. Each of the 400 kv transmission paths is split into two line sections and one of these (labeled Line 1 in Fig. 1) is the line section whose protection relays are to be tested using the automated procedure. For the purposes of this study, Line 1 is protected at each of its ends with mho distance relays R1 and R2. These distance relays at each end of Line 1 are set to have a Zone 1 reach of 80% of the line length and a Zone 2 reach of 120% of the line length as shown in Fig. 1, and they are set up in a permissive overreaching scheme, with communication of the permissive signals between the two relays. However, the scheme does not include any weak-end infeed logic settings on the relays. The entire transmission network shown in the diagram of Fig. 1, including the current and voltage transformers feeding each relay, are modelled on the real-time simulator. The distance protection at each end of Line 1 is carried out with SEL 311 C relays [3], each connected in closed-loop with the realtime simulation model, such that the relays respond to the actual real-time variables from the transmission system, and their trip signals are used to open the circuit breakers in the real-time model. In addition, in order to make the system representation as realistic as possible, the permissive transmit/receive communication channels between the two relays are fed via the real-time simulator so that a typical value of propagation delay can be added to each channel (a propagation delay of 8 ms was used during the practical tests). Fig. 1. Single-line diagram of the electrical network used as the study system. The real-time simulation model of the study system in Fig. 1 has been set up to allow short circuit faults to be applied at different locations on both Line 1 and Line 2 in order to test the permissive logic and basic operation of the protection scheme. In addition the study system model has been set up to allow the type of short circuit fault (i.e. A, B or C phase to ground, A phase to B phase etc.) to be varied, as well as to allow variations in the value of the arc resistance of the fault itself. Fig. 2 shows a photograph of the two SEL 311C energize - September Page 28
2 relays, as well as the peripheral hardware and real-time simulator connections required to implement the hardware-in-loop, permissive overreaching distance protection scheme used in this demonstration example. A more in-depth explanation of the hardware-in-loop interfacing methods used for RTDS relay testing can be found in [4]. Manual relay test procedure Fig. 3: Runtime Interface for the real-time simulator model of the study system in Fig. 1. Once a real-time model of a study system such as that shown in Fig. 1 has been configured, and correctly connected to the external relay hardware to be tested, it can be compiled and run on RTDS simulator racks in either manual or automated mode. However, in order to run the real-time model in either of these modes, it is necessary first to develop a Runtime Interface for the model. This Runtime Interface is essentially an interactive software control and monitoring panel that is used to operate, and interact with a real-time simulation, from a standard host computer connected to the RTDS racks. Fig. 3 shows the Runtime Interface for the real-time simulator model of the study system of Fig. 1. For the particular purposes of this study, the Runtime Interface has sliders that can be used to adjust the location of the fault on either Line 1 or Line 2 (measured in percentage of the length of Line 1 from relay R1) as well as a dial to select what type of fault is to be applied at either location. In addition, the Runtime interface has a slider to allow the user to select the value of the fault resistance to be applied. The Runtime Interface also has a pushbutton with which to initiate the fault for the selected combination of fault resistance, type and location. Fig. 2: Photograph of the equipment connections used in hardware-in-loop testing of a permissive overreaching distance protection scheme. Fig. 4: Response of relays R1 and R2 to a 0,001 Ω, single-phase to ground fault In manually-operated mode, the user starts the real-time simulation (also from the Runtime Interface), and selects the type, position and resistance parameters for a desired fault from the Runtime Interface Panel, and then presses the pushbutton on the Runtime Interface Panel to apply the specified fault. Upon depression of this pushbutton, the realtime simulator applies the specified fault and the protection relays operate (or not, as the case may be) in response to this fault. The application of the fault also triggers the Runtime Interface to gather, and graphically display, a range of user specified variables from the realtime simulation model, including a small percentage of pre-fault data for each variable, so that the response of the relays to the fault can be analysed in detail. The real-time simulation is then typically halted, and the user inspects the set of variables recorded on the various graph windows of the Runtime Interface Panel, as well as the front panels of the individual protection relays themselves, in order to assess the response of the protection scheme to that particular energize - September Page 29
3 fault. In this manually-operated mode, the real-time simulation model is manually started and stopped by the user, and for each fault of interest, the parameters of the fault are chosen manually, and the response of the relays to the fault assessed before the next fault of interest is applied. Fig. 4 shows an example of the results obtained from a single, manuallyoperated real-time simulator test on the study system in Fig. 1; in this case the fault considered was a single-phase to ground fault of resistance Ω, located 40% of the length of Line 1 from relay R1. The results in Fig. 4 show how fault information appears to the user at the end of a single, manually-run real-time simulation, as well as how this information is interpreted and analysed. Any switching event in a real-time simulation (such as the application of a fault or the opening of a pole of a circuit breaker) has an associated binary logic variable: transitions in these logic variables can thus be used to determine the exact time at which a fault was applied, as well as the exact time at which a breaker opened in response to a command from an external relay. Fig. 4 shows that the operating time of an individual relay is then determined by subtracting the time at which a fault was applied from the time at which that relay actually tripped. The results shown in Fig. 4 correspond to a low resistance ground fault that is located in Zone 1 of both of the relays R1 and R2 protecting Line 1 in Fig. 1. For this scenario, the results show that both relays do in fact correctly see the fault in their respective Zone 1 and both issue a trip within one and a half cycles as expected. Automated relay testing Once a working real-time simulation case study has been developed, the RTDS environment provides user-support tools that can be used to automate the real-time simulation, data recording and assessment procedures. The automation procedure involves writing a script file in a C-like programming language to replicate (and repeat) both the manual actions performed by the user when running a simulation from the Runtime Interface Panel, as well as the analysis of the data recorded on the Runtime Interface Panel at the end of the simulation by the user. It is relatively simple to automate the manual actions carried out by the user when running a typical real-time simulation: in practice, much of the C code script required to run a single realtime simulation session can be automatically generated by using a macrorecord feature on the simulator to record all the key strokes carried out from the computer during a typical simulation run. The process of automating the post-simulation analysis and interpretation of fault records on the Runtime Interface Panel is more challenging and does require some C programming skill. In addition, the user has to code all the conditional loops needed to iteratively update the parameters to be changed each time the simulation is run during the automated procedure. The RTDS environment does however provide all the necessary script coding language tools to implement automated analysis of fault records. However, it should be noted that a script file can only process and interpret data recorded from within the real-time simulation model itself. Consequently, if any information is required from the external protection relays in order to assess their response to a fault (e.g. whether the Zone 1 element in the physical relays under test actually picked up) this information has to be passed to the realtime simulation model from the relays at each time step during the simulation, so that it is available for processing by the scripting program. A significant number of the interconnections shown in the photograph of Fig. 2 are there specifically to pass internal logic (binary) variables from the relays to the real-time simulator for this purpose. Although the RTDS racks have the capacity to accept as many such binary inputs as are likely to be required, it has been found in practice that the number of such variables that can be passed is limited by the availability of binary outputs on the relays themselves. Fig. 5 shows a flow chart of the script file that has been written in order to automate the testing of the distance protection scheme for the study system of Fig. 1. The flow chart illustrates that at the heart of the script file is the code required to run a single instance of the real-time simulation, and to process and record the data gathered at the end of that instance of the simulation; the three outer conditional loops in the flow chart iteratively update the fault location, fault resistance and fault type so that a different combination of these parameters is used for successive simulation runs. It is possible to add additional such loops to vary other parameters of interest (such as point-onwave of fault inception) but this demonstration case example has been limited to three loops. Fig. 5: Flow chart of the code written to automate the hardware-in-loop tests of relays R1 and R2 shown in Figs. 1 & 2. The specific code that must be written to automatically process and record the data gathered at the end of each instance of a real-time simulation depends on what information the user wishes to obtain from the automated study. Typical examples of information that might be required by the user are: whether each relay tripped; the time for each relay to trip; the mode in which the relays tripped (e.g. which zone elements picked up, whether permissive tripping energize - September Page 30
4 occurred, etc.). As illustrated in Fig. 4, the calculation of the time to operate for each relay is straightforward for a human operator to carry out at the end of a manual simulation run, using simple observations of the relevant binary logic variables recorded during the real-time simulation. By contrast, during an automated real-time simulator test, each visual observation of the recorded data (and subsequent mental deduction) ordinarily made by a human operator has to be carefully coded into the script file: special array processing functions must be used to find each transition in the relevant binary logic variables, sort positivegoing from negative-going transitions, and then determine the time of each such transition before the relays. Operating times can be calculated. However, the C-like scripting language does provide the array processing functions needed to automate the procedure carried out by a human operator when analysing such data records [2]. Fig. 6: Code fragment from the full script file written to automate hardwareinloop relay testing, illustrating the techniques used to calculate the trip time for relay R1. A fragment of the actual scripting code used in this demonstration example is shown in Fig. 6 to illustrate the approach used to calculate the operating time of relay R1 using these special array processing functions. The code in Fig. 6 shows that a function arrayuptransitions is used to search for a one to zero transition in an array Fault: upon completion of each single simulation run, this array Fault contains a complete record of the behaviour of the same binary logic signal that is shown in the first plot window of Fig. 4. The function arrayuptransitions returns an index pointing to the location, within this array Fault, at which any zero-to-one transition was found; the actual value of time during the simulation corresponding to this transition point in the recorded data array is then obtained using a function ixtotime and saved in the variable FltTime. Similarly, the function arraydowntransitions is used to search for a oneto- zero transition in an array Breaker1, which contains a record of the binary logic signal representing the status of the particular circuit breaker under the control of relay R1 during the real-time simulation run: if such a transition is found, it indicates that relay R1 did issue a trip signal, and the index to this transition is again used (by means of function ixtotime) to determine the actual value of time TrTime at which this trip signal was received from the relay. The operating time of the relay Flt2TripTime is then calculated simply by subtracting the value of time recorded in FltTime from that in TrTime; non-receipt of a trip signal from a relay was recorded as a relay energize - September Page 31
5 operating time of 999,99 s in this demonstration example. Similar array processing techniques to those shown in Fig. 6 were used to determine the operating time of relay R2, as well as to determine the final status of the various binary logic variables imported into the real-time simulation model from each external relay at the end of each test. The penultimate stage in each iteration is for the script file to save the results of the automated post-fault analysis described above, in a suitable format, to a single row of an output file (shown as stdout in the flowchart of Fig. 4). The final step in each iteration is then for the script file to execute the necessary commands to reset each of the relays, and close their associated circuit breakers within the real-time model in readiness for the next iteration of the automated testing procedure. Once all the iterations are completed, the output file stdout then contains the tabulated outcomes of each unique test on the protection scheme under study. Table 1 shows a subset of the tabulated results obtained from an automated set of tests run on the study system described in Section II. Each row of the table constitutes a summary of how the protection relays responded to the application of a specific fault and corresponds to a single run of the real-time system model on the simulator. The script file for this demonstration example has been programmed to save the location, type and resistance of the fault applied in each simulation, as well as to record pertinent information from each relay at the end of each simulation run (e.g. whether the Zone 1 or Zone 2 elements picked up, which phases the relay determined to be in fault, permissive communications etc.). Finally, the script file has been programmed to calculate and record the time to trip for each relay (in cases where the relay does not trip, the recorded trip time of 999,99 s allows for easy visual identification during later off-line analysis. The full table of results (not shown here due to space restrictions) documented the parameters and outcomes of 180 separate individual real-time simulator studies of the example protection scheme, run in automated mode by the script file, and requiring no user input other than to start the procedure. Once started, the script file runs unattended (including automatically resetting the protection relays at the beginning of a simulation run) and, upon completion, provides a flat text file containing a row-oriented, comma-delimited table of data such as that shown in Table 1; the only subsequent manipulation that may be required by the user is simply to load this data into a spreadsheet programme, although the data can easily be read and analysed as a flat text file if desired. It needs to be borne in mind that each of the two different modes of real-time simulation (manual and automated) has advantages and disadvantages and, ideally, they should both be used to complement one another. Automated mode allows a large number of simulations to be run at a time, to cover a wide set of scenarios, but provides limited information on what happened during each simulation run. By contrast, running a single simulation in manual mode is more cumbersome, but a full set of variables is available at the end of the simulation run to show how both the transmission system and protection relays behaved before, during and after application of the fault. Once an automated multi-run simulation study has been completed, it is possible (and advisable) to analyse the output data row by row, and repeat specific cases of interest in manual, single-simulation-run mode (for example to carry out more detailed analysis of fault scenarios of particular interest, or of cases where the relay may have operated in an unexpected manner). A selected set of individual case results from the automated study of Table 1 is presented to illustrate this point. Fig. 4 has already shown the results of a single, manuallyoperated real-time simulator run of the study system for a 0,001 Ω, singlephase to ground fault located 40% of the length of Line 1 from relay R1; this scenario corresponds to one row of data saved during the automated test run, shown as row 1 in Table 1. As discussed earlier, the particular test considered in Fig. 4 corresponds to a low resistance ground fault that is located in Zone 1 of both relays R1 and R2 of the protected Line 1 in Fig. 1. Row 1 of Table 1 summarises how the automation procedure has extracted information, both from the realtime simulation variables in Fig. 4 and from binary variables passed to the simulator from the two relays. The results in row 1 show that each relay detected a phase A to ground fault in its respective Zone 1, and tripped in approximately 1½ cycles (30 ms for a 50 Hz system). Fig. 7 shows the results of a single, manually-operated real-time simulator run of the study system for a 34 Ω, singlephase to ground fault located 40% of the length of Line 1 from relay R1; this scenario corresponds to the second row of data in Table 1, as saved during the automated test run. The fault considered in this case is located in the same position as that considered in Fig. 4 (in Zone 1 of both relays), but as a result of the high fault resistance, relay R2 actually sees the fault in its Zone 2. However, relay R2 receives a permissive signal from relay R1 and therefore trips permissively allowing fast clearing of the fault at both ends of the line. Fig. 8 shows the results for a 40 Ω, single-phase to ground fault, once again located 40% of the length of Line 1 from relay R1; this scenario corresponds to the third row of data in Table 1, as saved during Row Dist FltName FltRes Trp_R1 Z1_R1 Z2_R1 A_R1 B_R1 G_R1 PTr_R1 TrpTime_R AG 0, , AG , AG , AG ,99 Row Dist FltName FltRes Trp_R2 Z1_R2 Z2_R2 A_R2 B_R2 G_R2 PTr_R2 TrpTime_R AG 0, , AG , AG , AG ,99 Table 1. Subset of the tabulated results obtained from the automated hardware-in-loop relay tests. energize - September Page 32
6 specific manner, in particular for cases where understanding the response of the protection scheme requires detailed consideration of inter-relay communications, together with a careful examination of the time-sequence of these communications. Fig. 7: Response of relays R1 and R2 to a 34 Ω, single-phase to ground fault the automated test run. The fault considered in this case is located in the same position as that considered in Figs. 4 and 7 (in Zone 1 of both relays), but now the fault resistance is sufficiently high that it is actually seen in Zone 2 by relay R1, whereas relay R2 initially does not see the fault in either its Zone 1 or Zone 2. Relay R1 therefore trips only after its Zone 2 timer has timed out (no permissive signal is received from relay R2 until after R1 has tripped). Once relay R1 has tripped, relay R2 is then able to see the fault in its Zone 2 and, because it has already received a permissive signal from relay R1, it then trips within one and a half cycles of the relay R1 trip. (Recall that no weak-end infeed logic is included in the protection scheme). The particular response of the protection scheme in this study example to the fault scenario considered in Fig. 8 is a useful illustration of the complementary strengths of the two approaches to relay testing using a real-time simulator. The automated testing approach allows the user to work through numerous fault scenarios very quickly (once the scripting code has been developed and tested) to identify potential cases of interest. By contrast, manual operation of the simulator for a single fault scenario is a much more efficient method of determining why a protection scheme responded in a For example, for the scenario considered in Fig. 8, the results from the automated test (row 3 in Table 1) indicate that each relay saw the fault in its Zone 2, and furthermore that each relay received a permissive signal from the relay at the other end of the line, which, at first face, would suggest that both relays should have tripped permissively and in approximately two ac cycles. However, what the results in row 3 of Table 1 do not show is that for this particular high resistance fault, because of weak-end infeed conditions, relay R2 does not see the fault in its Zone 2 until after the relay at the other end has tripped. This insight requires not just knowledge of whether the Zone 2 element of relay R2 picked up, but also when this element picked up relative to the time at which relay R1 issued a trip signal. While it is possible, in principle, to include such information and analysis in the tabulated output of the automated tests, this would require the development of a significant amount of carefully-designed code within the script file used for the automation procedure. It needs to be borne in mind that the development of the script file for automating the relay tests itself requires time to design Fig. 9 shows the results for a 55 Ω, single-phase to ground fault, once again located 40% of the length of Line 1 from relay R1; this scenario corresponds to the fourth row of data in Table 1, as saved during the automated test run. The fault is once again located in the same position as that considered in the earlier figures (in Zone 1 of both relays), but now the fault resistance is sufficiently high that it is actually seen outside of Zone 2 by both relays. Consequently, neither relay operates despite the fact that the fault is in fact on the protected section of line. energize - September Page 33
7 and test, so there will inevitably be a trade-off between the development time of the automation script, and the time required to conduct a small number of detailed tests by hand after the results of an automated study. Conclusion This paper has presented the results of a project to develop a proof-of-principle working example of automated hardware-inloop testing of protection schemes on a real-time digital simulator. The paper has described a simple example study system used to demonstrate automated testing of a protection scheme, and presented the results of a typical set of tests. In particular, the paper has contrasted the different levels of detail obtained from the results of manually operated, single-run real-time simulator studies against those obtained from automated, multiple-run simulator studies. It has been argued that the automated approach to testing protection schemes on a real-time simulator is best suited to quickly identifying fault scenarios of interest, whereas the manual approach to testing is a more efficient method of determining the reason for the particular response of a scheme to such scenarios. A thorough regimen for testing protection schemes using a real-time simulator should therefore use a combination of the automated and manual testing approaches. Fig. 8: Response of relays R1 and R2 to a 40 Ω, single-phase to ground fault Fig. 9: Response of relays R1 and R2 to a 55 Ω, single-phase to ground fault Acknowledgments The author acknowledges the support of the University of KwaZulu-Natal, the Durban University of Technology, the Eskom TESP programme and the Department of Trade & Industry THRIP programme. This paper was presented at the IEEE PowerAfrica 2007 conference at Wits University, Johannesburg, in August 2007, and is published with permission. References [1] McLaren P G, Kuffel R, Wierckx R, Giesbrecht J, Arendt L,.A Real Time Digital Simulator For Testing Relays., IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 7, No. 1, Jan 1992, pp [2] RSCAD Runtime Manual, RTDS Technologies, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. [3] SEL 311C Protection and Automation System Instruction Manual, Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, USA. [4] Rigby B S:.Closed-Loop Testing of an Overcurrent Relay Using a Real- Time Digital Simulator., Proceedings of the IEEE Africon 2004 Conference, Gaborone, Botswana, September 2004, pp v. energize - September Page 34
Blackstart Hardware-in-the-loop Relay Testing Platform
21, rue d Artois, F-75008 PARIS CIGRE US National Committee http : //www.cigre.org 2016 Grid of the Future Symposium Blackstart Hardware-in-the-loop Relay Testing Platform R. LIU R. SUN M. TANIA Washington
More informationExercise 2. Single Bus Scheme EXERCISE OBJECTIVE DISCUSSION OUTLINE. The single bus scheme DISCUSSION
Exercise 2 Single Bus Scheme EXERCISE OBJECTIVE When you have completed this exercise, you will be familiar with electric power substations using the single bus scheme with bus section circuit breakers.
More informationPRC Coordination of Protection Systems for Performance During Faults
PRC-027-1 Coordination of Protection Systems for Performance During Faults A. Introduction 1. Title: Coordination of Protection Systems for Performance During Faults 2. Number: PRC-027-1 3. Purpose: To
More informationHVDC Control and Protection Testing Using the RTDS Simulator
HVDC Control and Protection Testing Using the RTDS Simulator Yong-Beum Yoon, Tae-Kyun Kim, Seung-Tae Cha Power System Research Laboratory, Korea Electric Power Research Institute, Korea Abstract: Many
More informationWe will discuss two types of loss-of-potential (LOP) logic during this presentation:
1 We will discuss two types of loss-of-potential (LOP) logic during this presentation: Traditional LOP, which uses traditional voltage and current elements to detect an LOP condition. Advanced LOP, which
More informationFlexible High-Speed Load Shedding Using a Crosspoint Switch
Flexible High-Speed Load Shedding Using a Crosspoint Switch Will Allen and Tony Lee Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Published in Wide-Area Protection and Control Systems: A Collection of Technical
More informationStandard Development Timeline
Standard Development Timeline This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective. Description of Current Draft
More informationPower systems 5: Protection
Power systems 5: Protection Introduction In this series of articles, we will be looking at each of the main stages of the electrical power system in turn. As you will recall from our Introduction to Electrical
More informationUSE CASE 13 ADAPTIVE TRANSMISSION LINE PROTECTION
H USE CASE 13 ADAPTIVE TRANSMISSION LINE PROTECTION Use Case Title Adaptive Transmission Line Protection Use Case Summary The requirements for improvement in the performance of protection relays under
More informationRequests for Clarifications And Responses Order No. 754 Data Request The Study of Single Point of Failure
Requests for Clarifications And Responses Order No. 754 Data Request The Study of Single Point of Failure Revised: July 12, 2013 Introduction The following information includes requests for clarification
More informationHigh-Reliability Fault-Clearing System solution. Application Guide. Outdoor Distribution (15.5 kv through 38 kv) S&C ELECTRIC COMPANY
S&C Remote Supervisory V ista Outdoor Distribution (15.5 kv through 38 kv) Electric utility customers are increasingly concerned about the frequency and duration of outages they are experiencing, and are
More informationStandard Development Timeline
Standard Development Timeline This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective. Description of Current Draft
More informationSPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF FEEDER PROTECTION FOR BREAKER-AND-A-HALF CONFIGURA- TIONS. G. Steynberg
SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF FEEDER PROTECTION FOR BREAKER-AND-A-HALF CONFIGURA- TIONS G. Steynberg Siemens AG; Energy Sector, Energy Automation, Nuremberg 1. INTRODUCTION The breaker-and-a-half configuration
More informationPRC System Protection Coordination Supplementary Reference
PRC-001-2 System Protection Coordination Supplementary Reference Contents: Disclaimer... 2 Generator Protection Devices or Elements that May Require Coordination with Transmission or Distribution Protective
More informationDevelopment of a Real-Time Simulator Using EMTP-ATP Foreign models for Testing Relays
Development of a Real-Time Simulator Using EMTP-ATP Foreign models for Testing Relays September 17-18, 2018 - Arnhem, the Netherlands Renzo G. Fabián Espinoza Independent, Peru/Brazil Lise R. Romero Navarrete
More informationVerification of Utility Requirements on Modern Numerical Busbar Protection by Dynamic Simulation
111 Verification of Utility Requirements on Modern Numerical Busbar Protection by Dynamic Simulation Z. Gajić (ABB, Sweden) JP Wang / PW Gong / YS Xu (ABB China) ZX Zhou (CERPI, China) Summary Power utilities
More informationAUTOMATED TESTING OF BUSBAR DIFFERENTIAL PROTECTION USING A SYSTEM-BASED APPROACH. Christopher Pritchard, Florian Fink
AUTOMATED TESTING OF BUSBAR DIFFERENTIAL PROTECTION USING A SYSTEM-BASED APPROACH Christopher Pritchard, Florian Fink OMICRON electronics GmbH, Klaus, Austria; Christopher.Pritchard@omicronenergy.com ABSTRACT
More informationApplying branch circuit breakers and supplementary protectors in North America
Product Application AP01102005E WMZT WMZS Applying branch circuit breakers and supplementary protectors in North America Introduction Eaton offers two types of miniature circuit breakers for use in North
More informationDRS-LA413. Circuit Breaker Failure Relay. Operating Principle DRS-LA413. Operating Principle. Revision: 2 from Dwg.No.: DIL
Circuit Breaker Failure Relay Operating Principle Revision: 2 from 2005-02-25 Edition: 2005-02-25 _CBF-description_eng.doc Page 1 /14 Table of Contents: 1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION 4 2 FUNCTIONAL DESCRIPTION
More informationSE-135 MANUAL GROUND-FAULT GROUND-CHECK MONITOR
SE-135 MANUAL GROUND-FAULT GROUND-CHECK MONITOR AUGUST 14, 2001 REVISION 1 Publication: SE-135-M Document: S95-C135-00000 Printed in Canada. Copyright 2001 by Startco Engineering Ltd. All rights reserved.
More informationApplying branch circuit breakers and supplementary protectors in North America
Supersedes June 2017 FAZ-NA-L FAZ-NA FAZ Applying branch circuit breakers and supplementary protectors in North America Introduction Eaton offers three types of miniature circuit breakers for use in North
More informationEffective commissioning of bus bar protection systems using a dynamic simulation in the field
Effective commissioning of bus bar protection systems using a dynamic simulation in the field F Fink *, J Köppel, T Hensler *OMICRON electronics GmbH, Austria, florian.fink@omicron.at, ABB AG, Germany,
More informationAdvanced Protection and Control for a Power System Serving Industrial Customers
Advanced Protection and Control for a Power System Serving Industrial Customers Marco F. Jorge Iberdrola Energía Monterrey David Sánchez, Héctor J. Altuve, and Jorge L. Soto Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories,
More informationSystem Protection and Control Subcommittee
Power Plant and Transmission System Protection Coordination GSU Phase Overcurrent (51T), GSU Ground Overcurrent (51TG), and Breaker Failure (50BF) Protection System Protection and Control Subcommittee
More informationBus Protection Application Challenges
Bus Protection Application Challenges KN Dinesh Babu - Megger JC Theron, Lubomir Sevov GE Grid Solutions 2017 Texas A&M Protective Relay Conference Content Introduction Application Challenges Increase
More informationImplementing the protection and control of future DC Grids
Implementing the protection and control of future DC Grids Hengxu Ha, Sankara Subramanian Innovation and Technology Department, SAS, Alstom Grid 1. The challenge of the DC Grid protection 1 High speed
More informationReal Time Digital Simulator Testing of an On Line Integrated Stability Control System
Real Time Digital Simulator Testing of an On Line Integrated Stability Control System R.P. Wierckx, M. Kawasaki, N. Saito, K. Anzai, S.C. Verma Abstract The paper describes the testing of an on line integrated
More informationSubstation Automation Products. Line distance protection REL670/650 Relion 670 and 650 series
Substation Automation Products Line distance protection REL670/650 Relion 670 and 650 series For maximum reliability of your power system REL670 and REL650 line distance protection IEDs (Intelligent Electronic
More informationIMPROVING POWER SYSTEM RELIABILITY USING MULTIFUNCTION PROTECTIVE RELAYS
IMPROVING POWER SYSTEM RELIABILITY USING MULTIFUNCTION PROTECTIVE RELAYS Armando Guzmán Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. Pullman, WA 99163 A reliable power system maintains frequency and voltage
More informationOVERCURRENT / GROUND FAULT PROTECTION RELAY MPRB GF. (Code ) INSTRUCTION MANUAL ( M / 00 A ) (c) CIRCUTOR S.A.
OVERCURRENT / GROUND FAULT PROTECTION RELAY MPRB-99-1.0-GF (Code 512 191 ) INSTRUCTION MANUAL ( M 981 222 / 00 A ) (c) CIRCUTOR S.A. --- OVERCURRENT / GROUND FAULT PROTECTION RELAY MPRB-99-1.0-GF --- Page
More informationKS3 Computing - Life Without Levels
Project Elite Standard Foundation To create a strong password and log To create a strong password and log on. Create a password and log on with on independently. Give a basic explanation as to what makes
More informationA Collation & Analysis Methodology for Substation Event Data via a Web Interface (supporting COMTRADE, GOOSE & MMS Data Sources from Multiple Vendors)
1 A Collation & Analysis Methodology for Substation Event Data via a Web Interface (supporting COMTRADE, GOOSE & MMS Data Sources from Multiple Vendors) Abstract Author: Bruce Mackay Email Address: bruce.mackay@concogrp.com
More informationApplication Techniques CENTERLINE 2100 Motor Control Centers
POWER SYSTEM CONSIDERATIONS FOR PRODUCT SELECTION Application Techniques CENTERLINE 2100 Motor Control Centers Power System Considerations for Product Selection i Power System Considerations for Product
More informationPower System Protection Laboratory Electric Power and Energy Engineering
Experiment no. 5 Overcurrent Protection of Transmission Line Power System Protection Laboratory Electric Power and Energy Engineering Dr. Jamal Thalji Eng. Saddam Ratrout Eng. Mageda El-Moubarak Content
More informationEMS / DMS. DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM- Functional Description
EMS / DMS DISTRIBUTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM- Content 1. INTRODUCTION... 4 2. MODES OF INTERACTION WITH THE SCADA SYSTEM... 5 2.1 Simulation Mode... 5 2.2 State Estimation Mode (See functional description
More informationAUTOMATED ANALYSIS OF PROTECTIVE RELAY DATA
AUTOMATED ANALYSIS OF PROTECTIVE RELAY DATA M. Kezunovic, X. Luo Texas A&M University, U. S. A. kezunov@ee.tamu.edu, xuluo@ee.tamu.edu SUMMARY Validation and diagnosis of relay operation is very important
More informationAutomatic Testing of ACS2000 Medium Voltage Drive
IJIRST International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology Volume 4 Issue 1 June 2017 ISSN (online): 2349-6010 Automatic Testing of ACS2000 Medium Voltage Drive Shriram S Sr. Domain Engineer
More informationImplementing an Advanced Simulation Tool for Comprehensive Fault Analysis
Implementing an Advanced Simulation Tool for Comprehensive Fault Analysis 1 Nan Zhang, Student Member, IEEE, and Mladen Kezunovic, Fellow, IEEE Abstract Many large scale system blackouts involve relay
More informationLessons Learned Implementing an IEC based Microgrid Power- Management System. K.A. GRAY, J.J. MRAZ* POWER Engineers, Inc.
21, rue d Artois, F-75008 PARIS CIGRE US National Committee http : //www.cigre.org 2015 Grid of the Future Symposium Lessons Learned Implementing an IEC 61850-based Microgrid Power- Management System K.A.
More informationTesting Instruments Manufactured by
Circuit Breaker Dynamic Contact Resistance Meter HISAC Ultima Circuit Breaker Dynamic Test Set with up to Six Channel Dynamic Contact Resistance Meter 24 Binary Channels (4 Main + 4 PIR per Pole, 3 Poles
More informationCP30F Series Circuit Protector for Improving Safety and Wiring Workability
CP30F Series Circuit Protector for Improving Safety and Wiring Workability EMURA, Takeshi * A B S T R A C T A circuit protector is a circuit-breaker that possesses both overcurrent protection and switch
More informationTRANSMISSION ENGINEERING STANDARDS SUBSTATIONS
This standard was reviewed and approved by key managers on. Officer approval of this revision is not required. 1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This guide applies to the interconnection of a generating plant with the Oncor
More informationHID. GE Consumer & Industrial Multilin. High Impedance Differential Module Instruction manual GEK Copyright 2005 GE Multilin
g GE Consumer & Industrial Multilin HID High Impedance Differential Module Instruction manual GEK-113064 Copyright 2005 GE Multilin GE Multilin 215 Anderson Avenue L6E 1B3 Markham, ON -CANADA T (905) 294
More informationEE 868: Digital Techniques for Power System Protection. Laboratory Assignment #2 (Feb. 8 (12pm)) Overcurrent Relay Coordination
EE 868: Digital Techniques for Power System Protection 1 Objective Laboratory Assignment #2 (Feb. 8 (12pm)) Overcurrent Relay Coordination Rama Gokaraju Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering
More informationInformation Document PRC-001-AB3-1.1(ii) Protection System Coordination ID # RS
Information Documents are not authoritative. Information Documents are for information purposes only and are intended to provide guidance. In the event of any discrepancy between an Information Document
More informationSE-701 MANUAL GROUND-FAULT MONITOR
SE-701 MANUAL GROUND-FAULT MONITOR DECEMBER 19, 2000 REVISION 4 Copyright 2000 by Startco Engineering Ltd. All rights reserved. Publication: SE-701-M Document: S95-C701-00000 Printed in Canada. Blank Page
More informationDesigning a new IEC substation architecture
Designing a new IEC 61850 substation architecture Gerrit Dogger Senior Product and Application Specialist Cooper Power Systems gerrit.dogger@cybectec.com Garry Tennese Station Integration Specialist Manitoba
More informationC C CIRCUIT-BREAKERS Moulded-case (MCCB), general. 1. Introduction. 2. General description
CIRCUIT-BREAKERS C C81-21 CIRCUIT-BREAKERS - Contents 1. Introduction 2. General description 3. Rated voltages 3.1 Rated operational voltage (U e ) 3.2 Rated impulse withstand voltage (U imp ) 3.3 Rated
More informationAdaptive Protection in Distribution power networks
1 Adaptive Protection in Distribution power networks Vasilis Kleftakis, Vasileios Papaspiliotopoulos, George Korres, Nikos Hatziargyriou vkleftakis@power.ece.ntua.gr Smart RUE: Smart grids Research Unit
More informationMiCOM P521. Fast Feeder Differential Protection
01 Fast Feeder Differential Protection The relay provides high-speed two-ended current differential unit protection of overhead lines and underground cables in applications such as ring mains and parallel
More informationGE Energy Connections Grid Solutions MMLZ. Technical Data Sheet Auxiliary Modules. Publication reference: MMLZ/EN TDS/B
GE Energy Connections Grid Solutions MMLZ Technical Data Sheet Auxiliary Modules Publication reference: MMLZ/EN TDS/B MMLZ Technical Data Sheet FEATURES Wide choice of application specific models Fully
More informationp. 1 p. 9 p. 26 p. 56 p. 62 p. 68
The Challenges and Opportunities Faced by Utilities using Modern Protection and Control Systems - Paper Unavailable Trends in Protection and Substation Automation Systems and Feed-backs from CIGRE Activities
More informationMultifunctional System Protection for Transmission Lines Based on Phasor Data
Multifunctional System Protection for Transmission Lines Based on Phasor Data Igor Ivanković Croatian transmission system operator HOPS igor.ivankovic@hops.hr Igor Kuzle University of Zagreb, Faculty of
More informationDGBV-EP DIGITAL GENERATOR AND GENERATOR-TRANSFORMER UNIT PROTECTION. Field of application
DGBV-EP DIGITAL GENERATOR AND GENERATOR-TRANSFORMER UNIT PROTECTION Field of application The devices of the EuroProt complex protection family are modular devices. The modules are selected, assembled and
More informationSubstation Automation Products. Line differential protection RED670 Relion 670 series
Substation Automation Products Line differential protection RED670 Relion 670 series For maximum reliability of your power system The RED670 IED (Intelligent Electronic Device) is designed for protection,
More informationUser Manual. AQ-F215 Simulator
User Manual AQ-F215 Simulator Instruction manual AQ-F215 Simulator 2 (28) Revision 1.00 Date 16.5.2014 Changes N/A Revision 1.01 Date 13.3.2018 Changes Updated visual look Readability improvements Instruction
More informationEntry Level Assessment Blueprint Electrical Occupations
Entry Level Assessment Blueprint Electrical Occupations Test Code: 3029 / Version: 01 Specific Competencies and Skills Tested in this Assessment: Safety Apply shop safety rules and ergonomics Explain fire
More informationSiemens FuseSaver New half-cycle circuit breaker for rural smart grids to minimize operating costs of feeder and spur lines
Siemens FuseSaver New half-cycle circuit breaker for rural smart grids to minimize operating costs of feeder and spur lines Authors: Dr. Brett Watson, Siemens Ltd., PO Box 4833, Loganholme, QLD 4129, Australia
More informationDGSZV-EP DIGITAL GALVANIC LONGITUDINAL DIFFERENTIAL PROTECTION. Application field
DGSZV-EP DIGITAL GALVANIC LONGITUDINAL DIFFERENTIAL PROTECTION The digital galvanic longitudinal differential protection of type DGSZV-EP is part of device family named EuroProt. This short description
More informationLessons Learned in Static VAR Compensator Protection
Lessons Learned in Static VAR Compensator Protection Aaron Findley, Mychal Hoffman POWER Engineers, Inc. Dan Sullivan, Jan Paramalingam Mitsubishi Electric Power Product Inc. Presented by: Aaron Findley
More informationMcGill University - Faculty of Engineering Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
McGill University - Faculty of Engineering Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECSE 494 Telecommunication Networks Lab Prof. M. Coates Winter 2003 Experiment 5: LAN Operation, Multiple Access
More informationFAQ about Drives Technology
FAQ about Drives Technology Power supply systems MICROMASTER 4 SINAMICS G120 ID: 25220071 Warranty, liability and support We do not accept any liability for the information contained in this document.
More informationReal Time Monitoring of
Real Time Monitoring of Cascading Events Mladen Kezunovic Nan Zhang, Hongbiao Song Texas A&M University Tele-Seminar, March 28, 2006 Project Reports (S-19) M. Kezunovic, H. Song and N. Zhang, Detection,
More information1. Coordination of series-rated devices is permitted where indicated on Drawings.
SECTION 16055 - OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE COORDINATION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.1 RELATED DOCUMENTS A. Drawings and general provisions of the Contract, including General and Supplementary Conditions and
More informationUser s Guide REXA 103. General. 1MRK UEN Replaces UG E Version 1 August ABB Network Partner AB
User s Guide 1MRK 510 014-UEN Replaces UG03-8019E One to four shots, three-phase reclosing relay for transmission and subtransmission lines General Automatic high speed or delayed breaker reclosing after
More informationAdvanced Line Differential Protection, Automation, and Control System. Combine subcycle line protection with traveling-wave fault locating
Advanced Line Differential Protection, Automation, and Control System Combine subcycle line protection with traveling-wave fault locating Subcycle differential and distance protection minimizes damage
More informationMiCOM P122C Time-Overcurrent Protection
Protection Relays 01 MiCOM P122C Time-Overcurrent Protection Customer Benefits 1A/5A software setting 4 function keys Compact unit for flush and wall-surface mounting Comprehensive measurements Disturbance
More informationPGR-3200 MANUAL INSULATION MONITOR
Tel: +1-800-832-3873 E-mail: techline@littelfuse.com www.littelfuse.com PGR-3200 MANUAL INSULATION MONITOR REVISION 3-E-040918 Copyright 2018 by Littelfuse, Inc. All rights reserved. Document Number: PM-1025-EN
More informationProtection Redundancy Main I and Main II Security and Reliability
Protection Redundancy Main I and Main II Security and Reliability Roy Moxley, Siemens Abstract - Protection history and practice has long had two relays applied for protection of one line or piece of primary
More informationPGR-2601 MANUAL DC GROUND-FAULT RELAY
POWR-GARD Ungrounded DC System PGR-2601 SERIES DC Ground-Fault Relay PGR-2601 MANUAL DC GROUND-FAULT RELAY AUGUST 31, 2009 REVISION 1 POWR-GARD DC GROUND-FAULT RELAY PWR TRIP 5 4 3 2 6 - BUS 8 10 15 20
More informationComputing at Cox Green Curriculum Plan. Key Stage 3 Year 7
Computing at Cox Green Curriculum Plan Key Stage 3 Year 7 Term 1 Term 2 Term 3 Term 4 Term 5 Term 6 E-safety Database Programming Spreadsheet and modelling Web design How data is represented in s? How
More informationIowa State University
Iowa State University Cyber Security Smart Grid Testbed Senior Design, Final Report Dec 13-11 Derek Reiser Jared Pixley Rick Sutton Faculty Advisor: Professor Manimaran Govindarasu 1 Table of Contents
More informationDIVISIONE ELETTRONICA E SISTEMI IBF4N DIGITAL OVERCURRENT PROTECTION RELAY FOR BREAKER FAILURE FUNCTION USER MANUAL
DIVISIONE ELETTRONICA E SISTEMI IBF4N DIGITAL OVERCURRENT PROTECTION RELAY FOR BREAKER FAILURE FUNCTION USER MANUAL P500D820 September 2004 INDEX INDEX 1 GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS... 1 1.1 IBF4N OPERATIONS...
More informationIX SIMPÓSIO DE ESPECIALISTAS EM PLANEJAMENTO DA OPERAÇÃO E EXPANSÃO ELÉTRICA
IX SEPOPE 23 a 27 de maio de 2004 May, 23 th to 27 rd 2004 Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil IX SIMPÓSIO DE ESPECIALISTAS EM PLANEJAMENTO DA OPERAÇÃO E EXPANSÃO ELÉTRICA IX SYMPOSIUM OF SPECIALISTS IN ELECTRIC
More informationGeneration Interconnection Feasibility Study Report
Project #169 Generation Interconnection Feasibility Study Report 7/2/2014 Regional Electric Transmission Planning TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 3 Generator and Interconnection Data... 5 Study
More informationDR. IR. J.L. RUEDA TORRES LAB INSTRUCTORS:
1. Introduction RTDS Training course of IEPG DAY 6: Application of GTNETx2 card COORDINATOR: DR. IR. J.L. RUEDA TORRES LAB INSTRUCTORS: dipl. ing Matija Naglic, msc. Arun Joseph March 8, 2018 The objective
More informationIncreasing Security of Remote Control of Circuit Breakers from Intentional Destructive Impacts
Increasing Security of Remote Control of Circuit Breakers from Intentional Destructive Impacts Vladimir Gurevich Central Electric Laboratory, Israel Electric Corp. POB10, Haifa 31000, Israel gurevich.iec@gmail.com
More informationSession Five: IEC61850 Based Process Bus Protection Solution for Remote Located Power Transformers
Session Five: IEC61850 Based Process Bus Protection Solution for Remote Located Power 1. Abstract Dinesh Mithanthaya Design Manager, Horizon Power Higher capacity substation power transformers ( 5MVA),are
More informationLIBREOFFICE TRAINING PROTOCOL
LIBREOFFICE TRAINING PROTOCOL LibreOffice Training Protocol is a reference for professionals offering training services for LibreOffice, targeted at organizations and individuals deploying the free office
More informationSwitchgear Design Impacts the Reliability of Backup Power Systems
Switchgear Design Impacts the Reliability of Backup Power Systems December 2010/AT307 by Reza Tajali, P.E. Square D Power Systems Engineering Make the most of your energy SM Revision #1 12/10 When a cascaded
More informationOffshore BMU Configuration
BMU Configuration Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight line. Steve Curtis : System Operator
More informationMiCOM P521. Fast feeder differential protection
01 Fast feeder differential protection The relay provides high-speed two-ended current differential unit protection of overhead lines and underground cables in applications such as ring mains and parallel
More informationMasters in Advanced Computer Science
Masters in Advanced Computer Science Programme Requirements Taught Element, and PG Diploma in Advanced Computer Science: 120 credits: IS5101 CS5001 up to 30 credits from CS4100 - CS4450, subject to appropriate
More informationPERMANENT DOCUMENT. Annex AU to Routine Test Requirements for manufacturers (as per Article 9 of the Agreement)
PERMANENT DOCUMENT ENEC 303 Annex AU Annex AU to Routine Test Requirements for manufacturers (as per Article 9 of the Agreement) Safety requirements of Audio/video, information and communication technology
More informationSYMPATHETIC INRUSH PHENOMENA IN PARALLEL AND SERIES CONNECTED TRANSFORMERS USING PSCAD
SYMPATHETIC INRUSH PHENOMENA IN PARALLEL AND SERIES CONNECTED TRANSFORMERS USING PSCAD Tejpal P. Purohit 1, Prashant K. Bhavsar 2 Department of Electrical Engineering, Government Polytechnic Palanpur,
More informationSiemens AG I IA CE CP R&D-VI 4 WERNER-VON-SIEMENS-STRASSE AMBERG, GERMANY
Issued to: Siemens AG I IA CE CP R&D-VI 4 WERNER-VON-SIEMENS-STRASSE 48 92220 AMBERG, GERMANY This is to certify that Auxiliary Devices representative samples of 3UF70 followed by 0 or 1 followed by 0
More informationPGR-4300 MANUAL GENERATOR GROUND-FAULT RELAY
Tel: +1-800-832-3873 E-mail: techline@littelfuse.com www.littelfuse.com PGR-4300 MANUAL GENERATOR GROUND-FAULT RELAY REVISION 3-B-041318 Copyright 2018 by Littelfuse, Inc. All rights reserved. Document
More informationDesigo Insight Management station, V6.0 Getting started. CM110490en_ Building Technologies
Desigo Insight Management station, V6.0 Getting started CM110490en_08 2015-07-31 Building Technologies Siemens Switzerland Ltd Building Technologies Division International Headquarters Gubelstrasse 22
More informationDesign and Implementation of IEC in Communication-Assisted Protection Strategy
Design and Implementation of IEC 61850 in Communication-Assisted Protection Strategy Wei Sun, Reece Chambers, Ryan Kleinjan, Jeremy Nelson and Steven Hietpas Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer
More informationTwo Comments on the Principle of Revealed Preference
Two Comments on the Principle of Revealed Preference Ariel Rubinstein School of Economics, Tel Aviv University and Department of Economics, New York University and Yuval Salant Graduate School of Business,
More informationS5 Communications. Rev. 1
S5 Communications Rev. 1 Page 1 of 15 S5 Communications For a complete understanding of the S5 Battery Validation System (BVS) communication options, it is necessary to understand the measurements performed
More information2 ms arc-flash protection and feeder relay in one platform
Feeder Protection Relay 2 ms arc-flash protection and feeder relay in one platform Combine light sensor inputs with high-speed overcurrent protection to achieve secure arc-flash protection in as fast as
More informationDLD VIDYA SAGAR P. potharajuvidyasagar.wordpress.com. Vignana Bharathi Institute of Technology UNIT 3 DLD P VIDYA SAGAR
DLD UNIT III Combinational Circuits (CC), Analysis procedure, Design Procedure, Combinational circuit for different code converters and other problems, Binary Adder- Subtractor, Decimal Adder, Binary Multiplier,
More informationTechnical Requirements for High-voltage DC Power Feeding Interfaces of ICT equipment
Technical Requirements for High-voltage DC Power Feeding Interfaces of ICT equipment TR No. 176002 1.1.EDITION April 1st, 2015 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation Introduction This document describes
More informationPLC Programming D R. T A R E K A. T U T U N J I
PLC Programming D R. T A R E K A. T U T U N J I PLC Programming As PLCs developed and expanded, programming languages have developed with them. The three types of programming languages used in PLCs are:
More informationReyrolle Protection Devices. 7SG117 Argus 7 Synchronising Relay. Answers for energy
Reyrolle Protection Devices 7SG117 Argus 7 Synchronising Relay Answers for energy 7SG117 Argus 7 Synchronising Relay Fig 1. Independent check & system synchronising settings Adjustable slip frequency,
More informationAn Artificial Intelligence Based Approach for Bus Bar Differential Protection Faults Analysis in Distribution Systems
An Artificial Intelligence Based Approach for Bus Bar Differential Protection Faults Analysis in Distribution Systems By Eng. Sameh Moustafa Mohamed Abd Elgowad Elbana A thesis submitted to The Faculty
More informationMicro physical simulation system of electric power systems
International Journal of Smart Grid and Clean Energy Micro physical simulation system of electric power systems Xin Xu, Zongshuai Jin, Hengxu Zhang * Key Laboratory of Power System Intelligent Dispatch
More informationInstructions for Testing Magnum DS Trip Units Using PACB Test Kit Styles 87C0270G01-G03
Instructions for ing Magnum DS Trip Units Contents Description Page 1: Introduction............................ 2 2: Kit / Breaker Information.............. 2 3: Kit Setup.......................... 3 4:
More informationOrder No Assessment of Protection System Single Points of Failure Based on the Section 1600 Data Request. September, 2015
Order No. 754 Assessment of Protection System Single Points of Failure Based on the Section 1600 Data Request System Protection and Control Subcommittee (SPCS) and System Modeling and Analysis Subcommittee
More information