Managing Dimension Hierarchies for Reporting

Transcription

1 White Paper Managing Dimension Hierarchies for Reporting Abstract Every business has to aggregate numbers along hierarchies, like geography or department. Hyperion Essbase is very popular with financial controllers for facilitating this task. However, dimension design typically works on a per cube basis, which causes considerable maintenance overhead when the same dimension is used in multiple cubes or with other reporting tools. We describe a method where dimension maintenance is done in one cube the metadata cube and then exported to a relational table. From there, the dimension flows into any number of reporting cubes that want to use it. The dimension is automatically augmented to include all members occurring in the facts, even if they were forgotten during the dimension design process. We automatically create bridge tables to make the dimension acessible in relational queries and with any reporting tool.

2 We will use an asset management firm scenario for demonstration purposes. Let s assume the company has relationship managers or reps, whose job it is to attract net new money ( NNM ) from customers. Each customer belongs to exactly one rep. A rep s bonus depends on the NNM he or she attracts in any given year. This gives us two basic measures ( KPIs ), namely NNM and Bonus. However, we want two separate reporting cubes: One showing Bonus and NNM for each rep, and another one showing only NNM, the reason being that bonus size is sensitive information that not everybody should have access to. Both cubes share the dimension containing the representatives. Let us call that dimension dim_org, because it also shows how the reps are organized by country. Figure 1: A dimension tree The essence of this article is how to edit, maintain and distribute tree-structured dimensions like the one above, with the intent of using them for the aggregation of numbers in reports. Essbase comes with a tool called Enterprise Administration Console or EAS. We use EAS to create the tree and store it as a dimension of the special cube OMETA : The following table shows how representatives belong to countries: USA Fr Bob, Harry Jean, Francois Ger CH Kai, Malte Urs, Adrian We also would like to be able to sum up Fr, Ger, and CH into Europe, and then USA and Europe to give a total. One possible report would show bonus by country and year: USA Fr Ger Figure 2: The dimension tree edited in Essbase EAS Having a powerful tree editor allows a savy business user to visualize and manipulate the data aggregation without having to rely on an IT department. In this article, we use Essbase cubes and Essbase EAS for this purpose. However, the overall principle should generalize to other tools as well. After designing dim_org in cube OMETA, the next steps are: The dimension members have to be checked against the facts. When we talk about facts we usually mean a file or table containing NNM and/or bonus numbers per rep and year. There might be sales reps in the facts that we forgot when designing dim_org, or there might be typos. Actually, experience shows that this will inevitably happen every single time you load data. CH The example is simplified for clarity. In reality, there are typically about 10 dimensions, and at least a handful of these will be tree structured like our dim_org, and they will frequently be shared across several cubes. From the above example we can see that dimensions are often hierarchically organized. They are represented as dimension trees. For our sales reps in dim_org the tree looks like this:

3 The dimension has to be re-edited to inlude the missing members or fix the typos. The facts and dim_org have to be deployed to the reporting cubes. If we look at the process in detail, it gets a little bit more complicated. The figure below breaks things down into elementary steps. We will walk through them one by one. Note that most of these steps are hidden inside the two stored procedures sp_test_dims() and sp_deploy_cubes(), so in practice you will not have to worry about them. We need the facts to check for missing members in the dimensions. Because we have two cubes, NNM and Bonus, we also get two relational fact tables fact_bonus and fact_nnm. Any missing dimension members occurring in the facts will be added to the dimension table dim_org. A special branch dim_org_unknown is added to the tree to collect all the added members. A flat file can be read into an Essbase cube dimension. To visualize what happened when checking against the facts, the modified dimensions are loaded into a special metadata cube IMETA. The only purpose of this cube is to look at the results of the steps above. Steps (1) through (7) are repeated until we are happy with the results in IMETA. Both the dimensions and the facts are dumped to flat files from the relational tables. From there, they are loaded into the reporting cubes. We will now see what executing the above looks like in practice. This is done in EAS, which offers a nice point and click GUI for editing hierarchical dimensions (see Figure 2 ). The steps (2) through (7) are coded in T-SQL as a stored procedure sp_test_dims(). T-SQL is the procedural language that comes with Microsoft SQL server. The only reason T-SQL was used is that it was most easily available at the customer. You could write the code in Oracle PL/SQL, or in Perl, or as a Unix shell script. A workflow in an ETL tool like Informatica Power Center would be another possibility. Our end users are familiar with Toad or SQL Server Management Studio ( SSMS ), and they know how to run stored procedures. The following screenshot shows how the current year ist set and sp_test_dims() gets called from SQL Server Management Studio: Figure 3: The Dimension Cycle The manual dimension design process. This would ideally be done by a controller who understands the business, not by an IT person. Note that in our example dimensions alway refers to the one dimension we use, which is dim_org. cube OMETA to flat files. A flat file can be read into a relational table. One table per dimension, here a table dim_org. The tables represent the dimension trees in parentchild fashion. Figure 4: Running sp_test_dims() Notice the Essbase log messages inside SSMS. They result

4 from Essbase shell scripts that are executed from within the SQL Server stored procedure. The steps (2) to (7) of the dimension cycle are now finished, and we can check the outline of cube IMETA to see if there were any issues when trying to load the facts: not been a problem at all. Saddling yourself with another application just to hide such simple mechanics is probably overkill. At this point the dimension cycle is finished and we can deploy the facts and the dimension to the reporting cubes. The stored procedure sp_deploy_cubes() does the job. As before, we would like to emphasize that almost any scripting language could be used to do the job. Figure 5: IMETA with forgotten dimension member The special branch dim_org_unknown now has a child Florian. This means that one of the fact input files was reporting NNM and/or Bonus for Florian, which probably means that a new rep named Florian was hired, but we forgot to make him a member of dim_org. We go back to cube OMETA, create a new child Florian under CH, and run sp_test_dims() again. Looking at IMETA, we see that dim_org_unknown is now empty, and the new rep Florian correctly appears under CH: Figure 7: Running sp_deploy_cubes() The cubes are now directly accessible through the Excel Add-In. A few clicks are enough to generate a report showing NNM and bonus over time, both per rep and aggregated to higher levels: Figure 6: IMETA after adding the missing member Note again that this process will in practice involve several dimensions, not just one. Building a web interface to hide the details of calling stored procedures from the end user would not be a big effort. However, if you expect business users to be skilled enough to maintain reporting dimensions themselves, and to build their own cubes, they should not have a hard time calling a very limited number of stored procedures. In our projects, this has Figure 8: An OLAP report in Excel The data are, of course, totally fictitious and have no resemblance with the real business. Reporting on a cube through Excel is very popular with business users. However, for static reports, other tools are sometimes preferrable. Examples are Business Objects Web Intelligence, Hyperion Interactive Reporting, Crystal Reports, or any other Business Intelligence reporting front end. These tools are typically much better suited for accessing relational data than for reporting on OLAP (see [2],[3]) cubes.

5 Another advantage of being able to access the data through a relational DB is error checking. If the same source data get loaded into an OLAP tool and into a conventional DB, you can check whether you get the same numbers in both environments. If the numbers don t match, you almost certainly have a problem with your load mechanism or with the format of the input data. Silent errors that give you no warnings but result in wrong numbers are among the hardest to catch. Looking at the same data in different systems will considerably increase your chances of detecting them. The problem with relational databases is that they are not very good at rolling up numbers along trees, to say the least. We remedy this issue with automatically generating bridge tables when sp_test_dims() is run. A section on bridge tables can be found in [1]. A bridge table sits between each dimension table and the fact table and enables the use of straightforward SQL statements for consolidating along hierarchies. The details of bridge table generation and use would fill another article, so we will leave it at that and just present the join diagram and a view for our special case. The bridge table for dim_org is called bridge_org. The diagram above generates an SQL statement, which in turn can be encapsulated in a view: Figure 10: View to aggregate dim_org in the relational DB If all is well, a query on the view should give us the same numbers as the cube report. Let s try: Figure 9: Joining with the bridge table Figure 11: A query on the relational data While the row order is less than perfect, the numbers match exactly with the OLAP report in Figure 8. You could take this approach to an extreme and use Essbase merely as a dimension tree editor, while all reports are generated from the relational DB via bridge tables. However, you would lose the nice Excel integration, and the license cost would be excessive, unless you have Essbase anyway. Alternatively, an inexpensive tree editor like dhtmlxtree (available at could be used. By using the design functionality provided by an OLAP tool in combination with a relational DB as a dimension metadata store, the approach described above provides the following advantages: A dimension can be reused accross several reporting cubes. All maintenance and design work happens in one place only, in the Metadata Cube.

6 The dimension is automatically augmented with all members found in the facts. This guarantees successful data loads, while at the same time alerting the user to inconsistencies between dimension design and data reality. Automatically generated bridge tables allow the use of the dimension with virtually any reporting tool. This allows for consistent dimensions across the whole enterprise. Comparing the numbers from an OLAP system with those from the relational DB exposes load and aggregation errors. User trust in data and report correctness is greatly enhanced. References [1] Kimball, Ralph, and Ross, Margy: The Data Warehouse Toolkit. Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, 2002 [2] Thomsen, Eric: OLAP Solutions. Second Edition, Wiley & Sons, 2002 [3] George Spofford et al: MDX Solutions. With Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Analysis Services and Hyperion Essbase. Second Edition, Wiley Publishing Inc., 2006 Author Andreas received his PhD in computer science from University of Hamburg in Research work was focused on automatic speech recognition. Areas of expertise are data analysis, statistics, data architecture, high performance database systems, and data mining. Projects in financial services, telecom, and utilities. Your contact for further information Simon Hefti, Chairman P D1 Solutions AG Zypressenstrasse 71, Postfach, 8040 Zürich, Switzerland T , F