Linux Support of NFS v4.1 and v4.2. Steve Dickson Mar Thu 23, 2017

Transcription

1 Linux Support of NFS v4.1 and v4.2 Steve Dickson Mar Thu 23,

2 Agenda NFS v4.0 issues NFS v4.1 Supported Features NFS v4.2 Supported Features V4.2 Not Suported Features V4.x Other Features 2

3 NFS v4.0 Issues Performance issues Callback issues Delegation issues Locking Issues Mount negotiations start with v4.2 3

4 NFSv4.1 - Features Sessions Exactly Once Semantics. Callback problem fixed. pnfs File layout Netapp SCSI Layout Linux Flex File layouts Primary Data 4

5 NFS V4.2 Feature Sparse File Support Sparse files are ones which have allocated or uninitialized blocks in the file. (1.4.3) SEEK - Find the Next Data or Hole NFS: Implement SEEK (Sep 2014) READ_PLUS - READ Data or Holes from a File No published upstream patches yet Prototype patches improve performance with reading holes (See Anna s keynote graph). 5

6 NFS V4.2 Feature Space Reservation - Creating holes in files by transferring just the metadata over the network ALLOCATE - Reserve Space in A Region of a File nfs: Add ALLOCATE support (Jul 2015) DELLOCATE - Unreserve Space in a Region of a File nfs: Add DEALLOCATE support (Jul 2015) 6

7 NFS V4.2 - Feature Server-side copy Provides a mechanism for the NFS client to perform a file copy on the server without the data being transmitted back and forth over the network. COPY - Initiate a server-side copy NFS: Add COPY nfs operation (Feb 2017) Clone - nfs42: add CLONE proc functions (Sep ) Huge performance gain! 7

8 NFS v4.2 - Feature Security labels - A file object attribute allows the server to store labels on files, which the client retrieves and uses to enforce data access. (1.4.6) SECURITY_LABEL NFS: Client implementation of Labeled-NFS (May 2013) 8

9 NFS v4.2 Not Supported IO Advise - Applications and clients want to advise the server as to expected I/O behavior. (1.4.2) IO_ADVISE - Application I/O access pattern hints not implemented Application Data Block (ADB) Support - Some applications treat a file as if it were a disk and as such want to initialize (or format) the file image. (1.4.5) WRITE_SAME - WRITE an ADB Multiple Times to a File not implemented 9

10 NFSv4.x Other features LAYOUTSTATS Performance statistics from DS to MDS FlexFile use to load balance between DS(s) Session Trunking The use of multiple connections between a client and server in order to increase the speed of data transfer. pnfs File and Flexfile layout NFSoRDMA NFS4.1 support Kerberos Support 10

11 References Questions RFC RFC Vault 2015 Talk - lides/vault2015.pdf 11

12 NFSv4 Beyond v4.2 Part 2 of Road Map of the features in NFS v4.1, v4.2, and beyond Dave Noveck Netapp Vault Conference March 23, 2017

13 Contents A tiny bit about the NFSv4 Working group and the IETF process NFSv4 beyond v4.2 as approved GSSRPCv3 (used by some v4.2 features but separate from them) New Extension Model Currently Pending Extensions Other working group work (mainly focused on NFS performance) Revival of NFS/RDMA Higher-performance pnfs options (allowing use of NVMe, RDMA) Miscellaneous trunking issues

14 Working Group and IETF Process Front end (NFSv4 Working Group) Cycles of drafting, review, update No time limits. Process continues until everyone is ready to have Working Group Last Call for final working group review Despite a seemingly unworkable process, things do get done. Back end (IETF superstructure) Review by Area Director, IESG; RFC Editing process Back end process can take a year or more Good news is that substantial change rarely happens in the back end It is pretty safe to continue prototyping and do preliminary implementations based on final WG draft

15 GSSRPCv3 Published as RFC7861 in Nov (same day as NFSv4.2) Supports Mandatory Access Control for Labeled NFS GSSv3 provides support for subject labels Labeled NFS provides support for object labels Another motivation was inter-server case of server-side copy. Allows target server to read file on behalf of user requesting copy. No trust relationship required between source and target servers.

16 New Extension Model No V4.3, for a while at least However, optional extensions to V4.2 will be possible. Such extensions can define: New attributes New operations New flags or switch cases in existing operations New extension model described in draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning-09 Document ready for IETF superstructure to deal with Two extensions are ready for approval. (see Next Slide) More can be developed since v4.2 will be extensible.

17 Pending Extensions Slide One of Two Extended Attributes OTW support for size-limited extended attributes (such as Linux xattrs) Without this, copying a file with xattrs using NFS loses data Separate from named attributes: Those are based on multi-stream files in Windows and Solaris Document ready to be considered by IETF superstructure Upstream client-side patches exist for this No upstream server-side patches for kernel-based NFS server There are Ganesha patches for server

18 Pending Extensions Slide Two of Two Umask attribute Allowing inheritable NFSv4 ACLs to override the umask. Passes umask separately from mask attribute on file creation Without this, permission inheritance over NFSv4 is broken, Document ready to be considered by IETF superstructure There are upstream patches for both client and server parts of this. These two extensions and versioning document will go forward into the back-end process together.

19 Revival of NFS/RDMA Background NFS got an early start on RDMA Working group finished with docs in 2007; published in 2010 Unfortunately, Netapp changed its priorities and lost interest in RDMA Tom Talpey, the driving force behind NFS/RDMA, was laid off Documents were finished off in a rush and implementation lagged Tom went to Microsoft and created SMB Direct As a result, Documents were not clear enough to base new implementations on. The protocol had performance problems that SMB Direct did not have Working group decided to revive NFS/RDMA

20 Revival of NFS/RDMA Getting a Working Transport (Slide One of Two) Goal was to revive existing (Version One) transport. Existing XDR was to be used Performance issues were to be left for later Also, error reporting could not be fixed due to ban on XDR changes Two existing documents needed to revived/cleaned-up and one new one written. Rfc5666bis Extensive cleanup of RFC5666 Clarify requirement for Upper Layer Bindings for individual protocols Got rid of obsolete, never-implemented features Document has just been approved by IESG. After that, RFC editing

21 Revival of NFS/RDMA Getting a Working Transport (Slide Two of Two) Draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcrdma-bidirection Needed new feature Allows callbacks over RDMA, to support NFSv4.1 Document just approved by IESG. Being worked on by RFC Editor Rfc5667bis Also needed a major cleanup Needed to be updated to meet requirements for Upper Layer Bindings Document finishing up working group process

22 Revival of NFS/RDMA Addressing Performance Gap vs. SMB Direct Performance gaps of concern Need for better trunking support (see Trunking Slides) Remote Invalidation (supported in Version Two) Message Continuation (supported in an extension to Version Two) Near-term approach for performance gaps Experimental draft in process of becoming working group document Characteristic negotiation using CM private data Upstream patches for client and server Allows a simple form of remote invalidation No message continuation but need for it is lessened by ability to negotiate larger receive buffers

23 Revival of NFS/RDMA Advancing beyond Version One Everything on this slide not yet an official working group document Base Version Two Provides support for remote invalidation Larger default buffer size (1K 4K) Ability to negotiate a larger value. Version designed to be extensible Defined in an individual submission; should be ready for promotion soon. Version Two Extensions Message Continuation Send-based Data Placement Eliminates one inter-node round trip on an NFS WRITE. Also a big help where remote invalidation not available (e.g. User-mode server) Defined in an individual submission; discussion not far along

24 pnfs Mapping Types for Higher Performance SCSI mapping type (Green MT in Diagram Slide) Basically, a restatement of existing block mapping type, but It has a new code and so is distinct Scsi-to-NVMe mapping can be use to enable use with NVMe and NVMe/f Document has been with IETF superstructure for over a year Should be published any month now. Can be realized by FC, NVMe Devices, or Ethernet (via FCOE) Can also be realized as RDMA fabric by Ethernet or Infiniband using NVMe/F RDMA-based mapping type (Blue MT in Diagram Slide) Layouts could designate area in a remote memory. Could access /modify data using RDMA Read and Write Right now it is just a notion Will take work to make it into an idea and then a submittable draft. Can be realized by Ethernet (via iwarp or ROCE) or Infiniband

25 High-performance pnfs Possibilities SCSI MT RDMA MT NVMe NVMe/F-RDMA IBTA Intfc NVMe/F-FC iwarp ROCE v1 TCP UDP ROCE v2 FCOE IP FC NVMe Devices Ethernet Infiniband iscsi iser

26 Trunking to Enable Higher Performance Slide One of Two Types of trunking in NFSv4.1 Session Trunking Multiple connections (potentially to different addresses) as part of same session. Clientid Trunking Multiple sessions supporting a single client; intended for clustered servers Reasons for Trunking To get benefit of multiple wires/adaptors With clustered servers, get benefit of multiple server nodes working This is more suitable to client-id trunking than to session trunking used in Linux client For data access, pnfs can fill the gap High-intensity metadata access might need future work. Get hw parallelism within adapter by using multiple queue-pairs/connections.

27 Trunking to Enable Higher Performance Slide Two of Two Current Linux client issues with trunking No trunking in the non-ds case (MDS and no PNFS use) Lack of address list to drive trunking decisions No support for clientid trunking Limited trunking of multiple connection to same address Depends on duplicates within an address-list Path discovery for trunking Could substitute for the missing multipath_list4 in the non-ds case Unclear whether relying on DNS is adequate There is an individual submission under discussion Not clear how this will be resolved