Framework of Vertical Multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN
|
|
- Anissa Simmons
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ITU-T Recommendation Y.ipv6-vmh Framework of Vertical Multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN Summary This Recommendation describes a framework of vertical multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN. This Recommendation identifies the definition, requirements, functional architecture, and applications of vertical multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN. Keywords IPv6, vertical multi-homing, NGN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE REPRODUCED, BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ITU.
2 - 2 - Table of Contents 1 Scope References Definitions Terms defined elsewhere Terms defined in this Recommendation Abbreviations and acronyms Conventions Definition of vertical multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN Requirements of vertical multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN Multi-homing features and requirement of each layer Interaction across several layers Resource management of vertical multi-homing Other requirements for vertical multi-homing Vertical multi-homing scenarios Vertical multi-homing scenarios for establishing multiple network connections Vertical multi-homing scenarios as an aspect of each layer s multi-homing capabilities Only PHY/MAC layer has multi-homing feature PHY/MAC layer and network layer has multi-homing features PHY/MAC layer, network layer, and transport layer has multi-homing features All layers has multi-homing features Functional architecture of vertical multi-homing Functional architecture of vertical multi-homing in host side Functional architecture of vertical multi-homing in network side Applications of vertical multi-homing Use cases related to lower layer Use cases related to upper layer Security considerations...17
3 - 3 - ITU-T Recommendation Y.IPv6-VMH Framework of Vertical Multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN 1 Scope In Y.2052 (Framework of Multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN), multi-homing based on network layer (especially, IPv6) is described. As heterogeneous access technologies have been developed, network node has the ability to simultaneously connect multiple access networks to support mobility, reliability, load sharing, etc. These simultaneous multiple connections are established through multiple accesses to NGN networks using multiple radios, multiple network interfaces, multiple IPv6 addresses, and multiple transport sessions. To provide efficient simultaneous multiple connections, an IPv6 based solution is required to be considered to support multiple connections and its impact from/on multiple radios, multiple network interfaces, and multiple transport sessions as well. We assume that vertical multi-homing is a multi-homing based on simultaneous multiple connections characteristics of several layers and managed vertically across several layers. This Recommendation defines framework to provide efficient simultaneous multiple connections by using vertical multi-homing. The scope of this Recommendation which is subject to IPv6-based NGN includes: Definition of vertical multi-homing; Requirements of vertical multi-homing; Scenarios for vertical multi-homing Functional architecture of vertical multi-homing; Applications of vertical multi-homing; Editor Note: Vertical multi-homing is also related to the Q9/13 (Multi-connection), which may have more general view on multi-connection issue, including various multi-connection scenarios, such as application level, session control level and access level multi-connection. This proposed draft recommendation of vertical multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN focuses on the IPv6 based multihoming, which is a multi-connection solution for IP network layer. So, the work of this proposed draft recommendation will be coordinated with the work of multi-connection by Q9/13 2 References The following ITU-T Recommendations and other references contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this Recommendation. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All Recommendations and other references are subject to revision; users of this Recommendation are therefore encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent edition of the Recommendations and other references listed below. A list of the currently valid ITU-T Recommendations is published regularly. The reference to a document within this Recommendation does not give it, as a standalone document, the status of a Recommendation. [ITU-T Y.2001] ITU-T Recommendation Y.2001 (2004), General Overview of NGN. [ITU-T Y.2011] ITU-T Recommendation Y.2011 (2004), General Principles and general reference model for Next Generation Networks. [ITU-T Y.2012] ITU-T Recommendation Y.2012 (2006), Functional requirements and architecture of the NGN. [ITU-T Y.2201] ITU-T Recommendation Y.2201 (2006), NGN Release 1 Requirements. [ITU-T Y.2701] ITU-T Recommendation Y.2701 (2006), Security Requirements for NGN release 1.
4 - 4 - [ITU-T Y.2051] [ITU-T Y.2052] NGN. ITU-T Recommendation Y.2051 (2008), General Overview of IPv6-based NGN. ITU-T Recommendation Y.2052 (2008), Framework of Multi-homing in IPv6-based 3 Definitions 3.1 Terms defined elsewhere This Recommendation uses the following terms defined elsewhere: TBD 3.2 Terms defined in this Recommendation This Recommendation defines the following terms: TBD 4 Abbreviations and acronyms This Recommendation uses the following abbreviations and acronyms: TBD 5 Conventions TBD
5 - 5-6 Definition of vertical multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN Using IPv6 multi-homing features, a network and/or a network node is able to have multiple network connections with multiple network interfaces and multiple IPv6 addresses. In IPv6 multihoming, although a network and/or a network node have multiple network connections, generally, it uses only one network connection at one time. Other network connections are remained to prepare secondary (backup) connection and used for special cases such as the failure of primary network connection, necessity of higher bandwidth, load balancing, and mobility. It is different between providing multiple network connections and providing simultaneous multiple network connections with an aspect of how many network connections are used at a moment. In IPv6-based NGN, as one of example of an IPv6-based NGN network architecture, they consists of an IPv6-based core network and heterogeneous access networks which support IPv6-based IP connectivity [ITU-T Y.2052] Figure 1 One example of IPv6-based NGN architecture In Figure 1, we assume that a user terminal has an ability to access each access network. It means that the user terminal can access IPv6-based core network through each access network. In this case, the user terminal can use one access network or multiple access networks at a moment. If the user terminal use one access network and establish one network connection, the communication paradigm is similar to general communication mechanism. The communication method using TCP/IP at a legacy application is based on single network connection. In Figure 2, host 1 and host 2 has single network connection to communicate to each other. If we analyze this single network connection, it is composed of single network card (network interface, PHY layer), single MAC protocol (MAC layer), single IPv6 address (network layer), single transport session (transport layer), and fixed QoS parameters (application layer). Figure 2 Communication based on single network connection
6 - 6 - In this environment of communication based on single network connection, single MAC, single IPv6 address, and single transport session are together joined and single network connection is linked to an application. Figure 3 shows this case in TCP/IP aspects. Figure 3 TCP/IP application in single network connection In Figure 1, if the user terminal uses more than two access networks and establishes more than two network connections, the communication paradigm is not same as Figure 2 and Figure 3. (Typically, we can consider the case that the user terminal uses one access network but establishes more than two network connections through one access network.) As heterogeneous access technologies are widely deployed, a network node can have the ability to connect various access networks simultaneously. Figure 4 shows a case where a network node communicates to another node with simultaneously connecting heterogeneous access networks. In this figure, host 1 makes a communication to host 2 through three different network connections. Multiple network connections are composed of multiple network interfaces (PHY layer), multiple MAC protocols (MAC layer), multiple IPv6 addresses (network layer), multiple transport sessions (transport layer), and variable QoS parameters (application layer). Figure 4 Communication based on multiple network connections Communication mechanisms and legacy applications based on single network connection are different to those of multiple network connections. In single network connection environment, oneto-one mapping among single MAC and single IPv6 address and single transport session is established. But, in multiple network connections environment, instead of one-to-one mapping, multi-to-multi mapping is established. Figure 5 shows a TCP/IP application in multiple network connections environment.
7 - 7 - Figure 5 TCP/IP application in multiple network connections As shown in Figure 4, 5, in multiple network connections due to heterogeneous access networks, there are many layers used to establish multiple network connections. In PHY/MAC layer s aspect, there may be multiple network interfaces/mac protocols which are directly related to each access network and these multiple network interfaces/mac protocols may be simultaneously used. So, in PHY/MAC layer, there are multiple link layer (layer 1 and layer 2) connections to communicate with other node. In network layer s aspect, there may be multiple IPv6 addresses which are simultaneously used to establish communication path. So, in network layer, there are multiple network layer (layer 3) connections to communicate with other node. In transport layer s aspect, there may be multiple transport layer (layer 4) sessions which are simultaneously used (in this case, if SCTP and DCCP is used as a transport layer protocol). When we consider how multiple network connections are established, we can see that each layer has a role for multiple network connections. Even though multiple network connections are made by the help of each layer, there is no interaction or relationship between each layer until now. But, to make efficient multiple network connections and mange these connections, we should consider their interfaces and relationship between each layer. To do this, we consider vertical multihoming. In vertical multi-homing, each layer has their specific multi-homing features and their multi-homing features of each layer should be harmonized and interacted with each other. Figure 6 show each layer multi-homing and vertical multi-homing. We defines that vertical multi-homing is a multi-homing based on simultaneous multiple connections characteristics of several layers and managed vertically across several layers. Figure 6 Concept of vertical multi-homing In vertical multi-homing, each layer has a multi-homing feature and there are many network resources used to establish multiple network connections. In PHY/MAC layer, multiple network
8 - 8 - access technologies, multiple network interfaces, multiple channels, and multiple radios are network resources. In network layer, multiple IPv6 addresses and multiple prefix information are network resources. In transport layer, multiple transport sessions are network resources. To efficiently establish multiple network connections and mange network resources, it is needed to manage with integrated and harmonized fashion. 7 Requirements of vertical multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN In Y.2052, to apply IPv6 multi-homing to IPv6-based NGN, general requirements of multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN, requirements of site multi-homing, and requirements of host multi-homing are described. For vertical multi-homing, including the requirement of IPv6-multi-homing, other layers such as PHY/MAC layer multi-homing and transport layer multi-homing is required to be considered to support IPv6 multi-homing. In this section, we identify each layer s multi-homing features and describe the requirements of each layer for vertical multi-homing. After describing the requirements of each layer, we describe the requirement of interaction across several layers. Because the vertical multi-homing handles several layers, there are many network resources to be considered. So, resource management is one of important requirements for vertical multi-homing. 7.1 Multi-homing features and requirement of each layer Typically, IPv6 multi-homing means that a feature of IPv6 hosts and/or IPv6 network that enables the host and/or network to be multi-homed to networks through multiple network interfaces and multiple IPv6 addresses. To provide multiple network connections, not only IPv6-multi-homing, but also other layers features play an important role. In PHY/MAC layer, there may be many PHY entities (physical interfaces, radios, channels, etc.,) and many MAC entities (MAC protocols, etc.,). If we assume that the connection on PHY/MAC layer is link layer connection, there may be many link layer connections due to heterogeneous access networks. As heterogeneous access technologies and access networks have been deployed in IPv6-based NGN, a host can use multi-homing features such as multiple radios, multiple channels, multiple interfaces, and multiple MAC protocols. We assume that using these multi-homing features makes it possible to establish multiple link layer connections. For vertical multi-homing, multiple link layer connections are required to be provided and these multiple link layer connections are required to be simultaneously activated and utilized. And these multiple link layer connections are required to be harmonized with network layer connections. In network layer, for multi-homing features, multiple IPv6 addresses and multiple prefix information are used. By using these multi-homing features, multiple network connections are established at network layer. For vertical multi-homing, these network layer connections are required to be provided and these network layer connections are required to be simultaneously activated and utilized. And these multiple network layer connections are required to be harmonized with link layer connections and transport layer connections. In transport layer, for multi-homing features, multiple transport streams, ports can be used. By using these multi-homing features, multiple transport connections are established at transport layer. For vertical multi-homing, these transport layer connections are required to be provided and these transport layer connections are required to be simultaneously activated and utilized. And these transport layer connections are required to be harmonized with link layer connections and network layer connections. 7.2 Interaction across several layers Generally, layer concept (e.g., TCP/IP layer) simplifies design, implementation, and testing by partitioning overall communications process into parts. Protocol in each layer can be designed
9 - 9 - separately from those in other layers. Layer concept provides flexibility for modifying and evolving protocols and services without having to change layers above/below. Typically, Internet architecture and services have been developed based on this layer concept and operated properly. In NGN environments, where a host has the capability to connect to heterogeneous access networks and simultaneously use multiple connections, there is strong need to modify current layer concept. For example, cross-layer mechanism is that redesign of layer concept by the interconnection between each layer. It can include creation of new interfaces, merging of adjacent layers, design coupling without new interfaces, and vertical calibration across layers. Similarly, for vertical multihoming, interaction across several layers is needed. In figure 6, multi-homing at each layer are depicted; physical layer multi-homing, MAC layer multi-homing, network layer multi-homing, transport layer multi-homing, and application layer multi-homing, If multi-homing of each layer are not managed with integrated fashion, it seems that the synergy effects of multi-homing of each layer is not good. For example, if there are multiple link layer connections at PHY/MAC layer and multiple network layer connections at network layer and there is no interaction between two adjacent layers, network layer do not know how many link layer connections are provided for them. Without knowing the below link layer connections characteristics, it is difficult to efficiently utilize network layer connections. As same manner, multiple transport connections are required to interact to below network layer connections and link layer connections to efficiently utilize. So, for the vertical multi-homing, the interaction across several layers is required. 7.3 Resource management of vertical multi-homing Vertical multi-homing is related to several layers; PHY/MAC layer, network layer, transport layer, and application layer. In each layer, there are specific network resources. In PHY/MAC layer, wire/wireless interfaces, radios, channels are included. In network layer, IPv6 address and prefix information are network resources. In transport layer, transport streams and port numbers are network resources. If we consider legacy layer concept, network resources at each layer do not affect other network resources at adjacent layer. But, in vertical multi-homing, due to the interaction across several layers, network resources one layer affects other adjacent layers. So, it is required to manage network resource with different ways. As described in section 7.2, in vertical multi-homing, interaction between adjacent layers is performed and network resources at adjacent layer affect other layer. Differently with legacy layer concept, in vertical multi-homing, it is required to manage network resource with integration fashion. And it is also required to consider the effect of using network resources in one layer to adjacent layer. 7.4 Other requirements for vertical multi-homing For vertical multi-homing, the following requirements are required to be satisfied to handle multiple interfaces efficiently over multiple network connections. - Routing optimization through multiple network connections over multiple interfaces: Routing optimization focuses on choosing the data path on multiple network connections for forwarding data efficiently in terms of diverse application requirements. - QoS based connection selection over multiple network connections: In heterogeneous environments, each interface technology has different transmission capability. Hence, the multi-homed host can forward data through different routing paths with different transmission capability over multiple network connections established with multiple interfaces. Also, dividing data streaming among different interfaces can increase transmission capabilities through simultaneous usage of multiple interfaces.
10 Bandwidth utilization over multiple network connections: Bandwidth utilization is to provide better transmission stability, reliability and performance. Hence, these issues included in bandwidth utilization are how to separate data stream and how to recombine data stream over multiple network connections. - Recovery scheme for interface failure: When original interface used for data transmission fails because of the problem of link disconnection in layer 2 or the routing problem in Layer 3, the multi-homed host must perform fast connection recovery by available any interface in the multi-homed host. Recovery Scheme or interface failure is to locally recover the disconnected route. - Interface (network) selection: Interface Selection defines which to use and when to change with interface selection algorithm and policy which depend on choice parameter such as signal strength, transmission rate, service stability and reliability. 8 Vertical multi-homing scenarios 8.1 Vertical multi-homing scenarios for establishing multiple network connections In a vertical multi-homing environment, there are two different scenarios for establishing multiple network connections with a network host according to the number of IPv6 source addresses as following: - Multiple network connections through unique IPv6 address per interface - Multiple network connections through shared IPv6 address per interface In the first scenario where the multi-homed host is assigned the unique IPv6 address per interface, the multi-homed host can send and receive packet simultaneously over the multiple network connections established with a network host through unique IPv6 address assigned to an interface. As shown in Figure 7 (a), this scenario addresses that the multi-homed host is able to create multiple connectivity via multiple network interfaces and uses multiple network interfaces simultaneously for sending and receiving packets without a particular IP stack support. Because a particular application which wants to establish multiple network connections contacts a network host by creating client-local TCP/UDP socket of transport layer with unique IPv6 address assigned to multiple network interfaces, that is, from the application s perspective, there exist multiple network connections between the multi-homed hosts. Figure 7 Multiple network connections through (a) unique IPv6 address per interface and (b) shared IPv6 address per interface In the second scenario, the multi-homed host is assigned the shared IPv6 address across multiple interfaces. Although this scenario makes only one IPv6 source address visible to the application, the
11 multi-homed host is able to access different network through multiple network interfaces. Therefore, it uses multiple network resources which can be accessed by multiple network interfaces. However, in this scenario, though a particular application in the multi-homed host wants to establish multiple network connections with a network host, the application is not able to establish multiple network connections. Since the application does not know multiple network interfaces support. Thus, a particular function for the establishment of multiple network connections is needed in the IP stack. Here, the function may perform the flow assignment for an application flow to be serviced on a particular network interface. 8.2 Vertical multi-homing scenarios as an aspect of each layer s multi-homing capabilities If a host has vertical multi-homing features, it influences not only PHY/MAC layer but also other layer such as network layer, transport layer, and application layer (and a user). As the deployment of vertical multi-homing to a host, there may be various scenarios of the usage of a host. At the beginning time, even though a host adopts multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer, other layers could not have capability to support the multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer. Also, a user who uses a host with multi-homing feature in PHY/MAC layer could not acknowledge the existence of this multi-homing feature. As the deployment of multi-homing feature in PHY/MAC layer, other layer such as network layer and transport layer could have capability to support multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer. But in some cases, a specific layer could not have capability to support multi-homing features in another layer in a host Only PHY/MAC layer has multi-homing feature Because of some reasons, a host may adopt multi-homing feature in PHY/MAC layer such as multiple interfaces, multiple channels, and multiple radios but other layers do not support the multihoming features in PHY/MAC layer (Other layers are not aware of the existence of multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer). Because of the overhead and cost of modification of original network layer, transport layer, and application layer, it is difficult to modify other layer all at once to support multi-homing features in a host. For specific applications and/or specific OS, it could be difficult to modify them to support multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer. In this scenario, the host must have a method to handle multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer even though original network layer and transport layer do not support multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer. Figure 8 - A host with multi-homing features in only PHY/MAC layer PHY/MAC layer and network layer has multi-homing features In this scenario, a host adopts multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer and network layer and other layers such as transport layer, application layer are not aware of the existence of multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer and network layer. For example, original Mobile IPv6 assumes the usage of single IPv6 address and single network interface but the extension of Mobile IPv6 considers multiple multi-homing features such as multiple interfaces, multiple CoA (Care-of
12 Address), multiple HoA (Home-of Address), and multiple HA (Home Agent). In Mobile IPv6 case, multiple interfaces can be multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer and multiple CoA, multiple HoA, and multiple HA can be multi-homing features in network layer. In this scenario, a host must have a method to effectively combine multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer and multi-homing features in network layer. Also, a host must have a method to handle multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer and network layer even though original transport layer and application layer do not support multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer and network layer. Figure 9 - A host with multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer and network layer PHY/MAC layer, network layer, and transport layer has multi-homing features In this scenario, a host may adopt multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer, network layer, and transport layer and application layer (including user) is not aware of the existence of these multihoming features in other layer. It seems that existing TCP/UDP could not have the capability to support multi-homing features and it seems that SCTP/DCCP could have the capability to support multi-homing features but it needs to be more enhanced to simultaneously use multi-homing features. In this scenario, a host must have a method to effectively combine multi-homing features among PHY/MAC layer, network layer, and transport layer. Also, a host must have a method to handle multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer, network layer, and transport layer even though original application layer do not support multi-homing features in other layers. Figure 10 - A host with multi-homing features in PHY/MAC layer, network layer, and transport layer Editor Note: In IETF, shim6(site Multihoming by IPv6 Intermediation, a layer 3 shim for providing locator agility below the transport protocols, so that multihoming can be provided for IPv6 with failover and load-sharing properties, without assuming that a multihomed site will have a provider-independent IPv6 address prefix announced in the global IPv6 routing table) was lately published. Multi-homing feature in network layer and transport layer has some relationship with
13 shim6 protocol. Any contribution for describing the relationship between shim6 and multi-homing features in network/transport layer is welcome All layers has multi-homing features A host may adopt multi-homing features in every layer and it is the ultimate vertical multi-homing. So, there are multiple connection characteristics of each layer and these characteristics may be simultaneously utilized and managed vertically across several layers. In this scenario, a host must have a method to interact multi-homing features across several layers and resource management of each layer for vertical multi-homing. Figure 11 - A host with multi-homing features in all layers 9 Functional architecture of vertical multi-homing 9.1 Functional architecture of vertical multi-homing in host side The required functions for vertical multi-homing are as follows. - Identifying resource on each layer - Resource management - Recognize network status and adjust resource - Interaction across several layers To provide these functions for vertical multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN, these functions may be located on both a host side and network side. This section describes required functions for vertical multi-homing in a host side. As show in Figure 1, multi-homing features exist in each layer and vertical multi-homing functions are related to multi-homing features in each layer. Figure 12 - Relation between vertical multi-homing function and multi-homing features in each layer For vertical multi-homing, resource identifying function, resource management function, network status recognize & adjust function, and interaction across layer function are tightly coupled and interacted. The basic capability of each functions are as follows.
14 Figure 13 - Functions for vertical multi-homing - Resource identifying function: For vertical multi-homing, there are many resources in each layer. It is important to identify what kind of resources are related to vertical multihoming and what kind of attribute of each resources has influence to vertical multihoming. Resource identifying function does the identifying resources on each layer for vertical multi-homing and the gathering some necessary information for resource management. - Resource management function: In vertical multi-homing, resource on one layer is closely related to resources on another layer. The role of resource management function for vertical multi-homing is controlling and managing resource on each layer with integrated fashion. - Network status recognize & adjust function: Because vertical multi-homing is interacted with each layer and related to resources on each layer, it is important to precisely recognize each layer status. To satisfy the requirement of specific service (such as guarantee end-to-end performance, guarantee minimum bandwidth for some application), vertical multi-homing has the capability to adjust resource on each layer. - Interaction across layer function: For vertical multi-homing, one specific layer must collaborate with other layer. Interaction across layer function manage the interaction between different layer for vertical multi-homing 9.2 Functional architecture of vertical multi-homing in network side The functions for vertical multi-homing in network side are also related to functions for vertical multi-homing in host side. Because the primary purpose of vertical multi-homing is to provide efficient multiple connections with consideration of multi-homing characteristics of each layer, the functions for vertical multi-homing in host side is basically charge of providing vertical multihoming and the functions for vertical multi-homing in network side assistance the functions in host side. In section 9.2 in Y.2052, functional architecture to support multi-homing is described. To provide functions for vertical multi-homing in network side, existing functional entities can be used to provide functions for vertical multi-homing. In contrast to functional architecture which is defined in Y.2052, RACF is required to be participated in providing vertical multi-homing. The following figure shows functional architecture related to vertical multi-homing in network side.
15 Figure 14 Functional architecture of vertical multi-homing in network side (Editor note: In Figure 14, the violet colour box functions are already described in Y And the red colour box function is newly considered function for vertical multi-homing. Further contribution will be needed for clarification.) (Editor note: In IETF MPTCP (Multi-path TCP) working group and Trilogy project, to provide multipath transport session, it is studied that it is necessary to provide resource pooling method. Although the resource pooling concept to provide multipath transport session is not completed, we think that similar approach is necessary to provide vertical multi-homing in network side. It is more need to study resource pooling method in NGN environment.) 10 Applications of vertical multi-homing In IPv6-based NGN, NGN users will benefit from always-on connectivity, load sharing, traffic engineering, fault tolerance with redundancy, and session continuity with the help of IPv6 multihoming [ITU-T Y.2052]. With vertical multi-homing, these usage cases are also applied into IPv6- based NGN. Besides these usage cases, vertical multi-homing has additional use cases as follows. - Use cases related to lower layer (e.g., PHY layer, MAC layer) - Use cases related to upper layer (e.g., transport layer, application layer) 10.1 Use cases related to lower layer Generally, a legacy user terminal utilizes one network interface for communication at a time. Even though, it has multiple network interfaces, it doesn t utilize multiple network interfaces simultaneously. The reason why it uses single interface at a time may be the compliance of traditional TCP/IP layer concept and there is no need to use multiple interfaces simultaneously. In traditional TCP/IP layer concept, typically, one network interface is directly related to one IP address. Even though IPv6 is widely deployed, this situation is not changed. The big difference between IPv6 and IPv4 is that there are lots numbers of IPv6 address and we can use IPv6 address fluently. We can use multiple IPv6 addresses per single network interface and multiple network interfaces in a host. So, we can utilize multiple network connections with using abundant number of
16 IPv6 addresses and multiple network interfaces. The benefit of IPv6 multi-homing, usage of multiple network connections with multiple IPv6 addresses and multiple network interfaces is not increased as expected due to the inefficient relation between one IPv6 address and single network interface. If a host has multiple interfaces and multiple IPv6 addresses, the relation between them may be exist as various ways and it may be dynamically changeable. Among multiple interfaces, some of them may be utilized (connected to access network) and some of them may not be utilized (is not connected to access network). Among multiple IPv6 addresses, some of them may be utilized (there is routing path to communicate) and some of them may not be utilized (there is no routing path to communicate). If a host can recognize the existence of multiple interfaces and multiple IPv6 addresses and the utilized conditions of each interface and each IPv6 address, the host may find the optimal association between network interface and IPv6 address. Figure 15 An example of relation in multiplicity of network interfaces and IPv6 addresses For example, in traditional TCP/IP layer concept, one specific interface and one specific IPv6 address is combined at a starting time of communication. The selection of one IPv6 address among multiple IPv6 addresses and the selection of one network interface among multiple interfaces are completely independent. Even though there are lots of advantages of this independent layer concept, this complete independent layer concept cannot utilize the benefit of existence of multiple interfaces and multiple IPv6 addresses. Because there is no specific rule for combining a network interface and an IPv6 address and one IPv6 address and one network interface is selected for communication, there is no guarantee to select optimal association between a network interface and an IPv6 address. After communication between nodes starts, the combination between specific interface and specific IPv6 address cannot be modified. In communication mechanisms based on traditional TCP/IP layer concept, the combination between a network interface and an IPv6 address should be used for the entire time of communication. During communication, if the relation combination between a network interface and an IPv6 address is modified, the communication is disrupted. Because there are multiple network interfaces and multiple IPv6 addresses for communication, a host can utilize multiple network interfaces and multiple IPv6 addresses simultaneously. But in traditional TCP/IP layer mechanism, a host cannot utilize these multiplicities of network interfaces and IPv6 addresses. If we use vertical multi-homing, we can utilize these multiplicities of network interfaces and IPv6 addresses. Vertical multi-homing can recognize the existence of multiple network interfaces and IPv6 addresses and coordinate among them. One-to-one mapping between a network interface and an IPv6 address in traditional TCP/IP layer concept is enhanced to multi-to-multi mapping between them. The host can find optimal mapping between network interfaces and IPv6 addresses and dynamically update the combination between them to adapt changeable exterior environment.
17 Use cases related to upper layer TBD 11 Security considerations TBD
18 Bibliography [b-ietf RFC2260] IETF RFC 2260 (1998), Scalable Support for Multi-homed Multi-provider Connectivity. [b-ietf RFC2772] IETF RFC 2772 (2000), 6Bone Backbone Routing Guidelines. [b-ietf RFC2894] IETF RFC 2894 (2000), Router Renumbering for IPv6. [b-ietf RFC2960] IETF RFC 2960 (2000), Stream Control Transmission Protocol. [b-ietf RFC3582] IETF RFC 3582 (2003), Goals for IPv6 Site-Multihoming Architectures. [b-ietf RFC4116] IETF RFC 4116 (2005), IPv4 Multihoming Practices and Limitations. [b-ietf RFC4177] IETF RFC 4177 (2005), Architectural Approaches to Multi-Homing for IPv6. [b-ietf RFC4218] IETF RFC 4218 (2005), Threats relating to IPv6 Multihoming Solutions. [b-ietf RFC4219] IETF RFC 4219 (2005), Things Multihoming in IPv6 (MULTI6) Developers Should Think About. [b-ietf RFC4340] IETF RFC 4340 (2006), Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP).
ITU-T Y Framework of multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU-T Y.2052 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (02/2008) SERIES Y: GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS AND NEXT-GENERATION NETWORKS
More informationITU-T Y Framework of multi-homing in IPv6-based NGN
International Telecommunication Union ITU-T Y.2052 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (02/2008) SERIES Y: GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS AND NEXT-GENERATION NETWORKS
More informationITU-T Y Next generation network evolution phase 1 Overview
I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n ITU-T Y.2340 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (09/2016) SERIES Y: GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, INTERNET PROTOCOL
More informationGeneral requirements for ID/locator separation in NGN
Draft Recommendation ITU-T Y.2015 (Y.ipsplit) General requirements for ID/locator separation in NGN Summary This Recommendation begins with showing the limitations of the conventional IP architecture,
More informationApplicability of IETF Mobility Solutions to the 3GPP All IP Network
Applicability of IETF Mobility Solutions to the 3GPP All IP Patrick Stupar, Krishna Pandit, and Wolfgang Granzow Qualcomm CDMA Technologies GmbH Outline Motivation All-IP paradigm in 3GPP LTE network Survey
More informationImpact of IPv6 to an NGN and Migration Strategies. Gyu Myoung Lee ETRI
ITU Workshop on IPv6 Geneva, Switzerland, 4 5 September 2008 Impact of IPv6 to an NGN and Migration Strategies Gyu Myoung Lee ETRI gmlee@etri.re.kr Geneva, Switzerland, 4-5 September 2008 Contents Introduction
More informationInternet Research Task Force (IRTF) Category: Informational May 2011 ISSN:
Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) T. Li, Ed. Request for Comments: 6227 Cisco Systems, Inc. Category: Informational May 2011 ISSN: 2070-1721 Abstract Design Goals for Scalable Internet Routing It is
More informationThis document is a preview generated by EVS
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 16512-2 Third edition 2016-04-01 Information technology Relayed multicast protocol: Specification for simplex group applications Technologies de l'information Protocole de
More informationSERIES M: TELECOMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING TMN AND NETWORK MAINTENANCE Telecommunications management network
International Telecommunication Union ITU-T M.3348 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (01/2011) SERIES M: TELECOMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING TMN AND NETWORK MAINTENANCE Telecommunications
More informationITU-T Recommendation Q
- 1 - ITU-T Recommendation Q.3304.2 Resource control protocol no. 4 SNMP Profile Protocol at the Rc interface between a Transport Resource Control Physical Entity (TRC-PE) and a Transport Physical Entity
More informationMobile SCTP for IP Mobility Support in All-IP Networks
Mobile SCTP for IP Mobility Support in All-IP Networks Seok Joo Koh sjkoh@cs.knu.ac.kr Abstract The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) is a new transport protocol that is featured multi-streaming
More informationPerformance Analysis of Stream Control Transmission Protocol
Buletinul tiinific al Universitii "Politehnica" din Timioara Seria ELECTRONIC i TELECOMUNICAII TRANSACTIONS on ELECTRONICS and COMMUNICATIONS Tom 49(63), Fascicola 1-2, 2004 Performance Analysis of Stream
More informationIPV6 SIMPLE SECURITY CAPABILITIES.
IPV6 SIMPLE SECURITY CAPABILITIES. 50 issues from RFC 6092 edited by J. Woodyatt, Apple Presentation by Olle E. Johansson, Edvina AB. ABSTRACT The RFC which this presentation is based upon is focused on
More informationDraft Recommendation X.sdnsec-3 Security guideline of Service Function Chain based on software defined network
Draft Recommendation X.sdnsec-3 Security guideline of Service Function Chain based on software defined network Summary This recommendation is to analyze the security threats of the SDN-based Service Function
More informationITU-T Q Signalling architecture and requirements for IP-based short message service over ITU-T defined NGN
I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n ITU-T Q.3053 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (03/2017) SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING, AND ASSOCIATED MEASUREMENTS
More informationSERIES J: CABLE NETWORKS AND TRANSMISSION OF TELEVISION, SOUND PROGRAMME AND OTHER MULTIMEDIA SIGNALS Digital transmission of television signals
International Telecommunication Union ITU-T J.281 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (03/2005) SERIES J: CABLE NETWORKS AND TRANSMISSION OF TELEVISION, SOUND PROGRAMME AND OTHER MULTIMEDIA
More informationITU-T G /Y
International Telecommunication Union ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU G.8261.1/Y.1361.1 (02/2012) SERIES G: TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA, DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS Packet over
More informationOPTIMIZING MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN FUTURE IPv6 MOBILE NETWORKS
OPTIMIZING MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN FUTURE IPv6 MOBILE NETWORKS Sandro Grech Nokia Networks (Networks Systems Research) Supervisor: Prof. Raimo Kantola 1 SANDRO GRECH - OPTIMIZING MOBILITY MANAGEMENT IN
More informationCC-SCTP: Chunk Checksum of SCTP for Enhancement of Throughput in Wireless Network Environments
CC-SCTP: Chunk Checksum of SCTP for Enhancement of Throughput in Wireless Network Environments Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) uses the 32-bit checksum in the common header, by which a corrupted
More informationA Flow Label Based QoS Scheme for End-to-End Mobile Services
A Flow Label Based QoS Scheme for End-to-End Mobile Services Tao Zheng, Lan Wang, Daqing Gu Orange Labs Beijing France Telecom Group Beijing, China e-mail: {tao.zheng; lan.wang; daqing.gu}@orange.com Abstract
More informationNetwork Working Group. Redback H. Smit. Procket Networks. October Domain-wide Prefix Distribution with Two-Level IS-IS
Network Working Group Request for Comments: 2966 Category: Informational T. Li Procket Networks T. Przygienda Redback H. Smit Procket Networks October 2000 Status of this Memo Domain-wide Prefix Distribution
More informationOSI Layer OSI Name Units Implementation Description 7 Application Data PCs Network services such as file, print,
ANNEX B - Communications Protocol Overheads The OSI Model is a conceptual model that standardizes the functions of a telecommunication or computing system without regard of their underlying internal structure
More informationITU-T F (03/2017) Functional requirements for virtual content delivery networks
I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU F.743.4 (03/2017) SERIES F: NON-TELEPHONE TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES Multimedia
More informationSERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN Service and session control protocols supplementary services
International Telecommunication Union ITU-T Q.3613 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (05/2012) SERIES Q: SWITCHING AND SIGNALLING Signalling requirements and protocols for the NGN Service
More informationENTERPRISE MPLS. Kireeti Kompella
ENTERPRISE MPLS Kireeti Kompella AGENDA The New VLAN Protocol Suite Signaling Labels Hierarchy Signaling Advanced Topics Layer 2 or Layer 3? Resilience and End-to-end Service Restoration Multicast ECMP
More informationITU-T Y Adaptive software framework for Internet of things devices
I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n ITU-T Y.4453 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (09/2016) SERIES Y: GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, INTERNET PROTOCOL
More informationHUAWEI AR Series SEP Technical White Paper HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. Issue 1.0. Date
HUAWEI AR Series SEP Technical White Paper Issue 1.0 Date 2015-01-19 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. 2015. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by
More informationISO/IEC 8348 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Open Systems Interconnection Network service definition
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 8348 Third edition 2002-11-01 Information technology Open Systems Interconnection Network service definition Technologies de l'information Interconnexion des systèmes ouverts
More informationITU-T G.979. Characteristics of monitoring systems for optical submarine cable systems
I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n ITU-T G.979 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (11/2016) SERIES G: TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS AND MEDIA, DIGITAL SYSTEMS AND
More informationITU-T Y Overview of ubiquitous networking and of its support in NGN
International Telecommunication Union ITU-T Y.2002 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (10/2009) SERIES Y: GLOBAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, INTERNET PROTOCOL ASPECTS AND NEXT-GENERATION NETWORKS
More informationThis document is a preview generated by EVS
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 13400-2 First edition 2012-06-01 Road vehicles Diagnostic communication over Internet Protocol (DoIP) Part 2: Transport protocol and network layer services Véhicules routiers
More informationTCP/IP stack is the family of protocols that rule the current internet. While other protocols are also used in computer networks, TCP/IP is by far
TCP/IP stack is the family of protocols that rule the current internet. While other protocols are also used in computer networks, TCP/IP is by far the most common of them. TCP/IP can be compared to the
More informationSubnet Multicast for Delivery of One-to-Many Multicast Applications
Subnet Multicast for Delivery of One-to-Many Multicast Applications We propose a new delivery scheme for one-to-many multicast applications such as webcasting service used for the web-based broadcasting
More informationTransport Services Internet Transport's Last Chance? Michael Welzl
Transport Services Internet Transport's Last Chance? Michael Welzl IMDEA Networks 31. October 2014 Outline Problem Solution 2 Problem 3 What s the problem? The Internet works! I work, too! Could be faster
More informationChapter 5 Ad Hoc Wireless Network. Jang Ping Sheu
Chapter 5 Ad Hoc Wireless Network Jang Ping Sheu Introduction Ad Hoc Network is a multi-hop relaying network ALOHAnet developed in 1970 Ethernet developed in 1980 In 1994, Bluetooth proposed by Ericsson
More informationLecture 2: Network Protocols and Layering
Lecture 2: Network Protocols and Layering Dr. Mohammed Hawa Electrical Engineering Department University of Jordan EE426: Communication Networks What is a Network Protocol? A protocol is the set of rules
More informationITU-T I.570. Public/private ISDN interworking. SERIES I: INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK Internetwork interfaces. Recommendation ITU-T I.
I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n ITU-T I.570 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (01/2018) SERIES I: INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK Internetwork interfaces
More informationFunctional Requirements 10/20/2003. IEEE Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access <
Project IEEE 802.20 Working Group on Mobile Broadband Wireless Access Title France Telecom Service Provider Requirements for 802.20 Date Submitted Source(s) Re:
More informationModule 16: Distributed System Structures
Chapter 16: Distributed System Structures Module 16: Distributed System Structures Motivation Types of Network-Based Operating Systems Network Structure Network Topology Communication Structure Communication
More informationMOBILITY MANAGEMENT FOR PROVIDING QOS IN LOCAL AREA WIRELESS NETWORKS
MOBILITY MANAGEMENT FOR PROVIDING QOS IN LOCAL AREA WIRELESS NETWORKS J. Antonio García-Macías, Franck Rousseau, Gilles Berger-Sabbatel, Leyla Toumi, Andrzej Duda LSR-IMAG Laboratory, Grenoble, France
More informationOn Distributed Communications, Rand Report RM-3420-PR, Paul Baran, August 1964
The requirements for a future all-digital-data distributed network which provides common user service for a wide range of users having different requirements is considered. The use of a standard format
More informationISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Open Systems Interconnection The Directory Part 5: Protocol specifications
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 9594-5 Seventh edition 2014-03-01 Information technology Open Systems Interconnection The Directory Part 5: Protocol specifications Technologies de l'information Interconnexion
More informationMultipath Transport, Resource Pooling, and implications for Routing
Multipath Transport, Resource Pooling, and implications for Routing Mark Handley, UCL and XORP, Inc Also: Damon Wischik, UCL Marcelo Bagnulo Braun, UC3M The members of Trilogy project: www.trilogy-project.org
More informationA Two-level Threshold Recovery Mechanism for SCTP
A Two-level Threshold Recovery Mechanism for SCTP Armando L. Caro Jr., Janardhan R. Iyengar, Paul D. Amer, Gerard J. Heinz Computer and Information Sciences University of Delaware acaro, iyengar, amer,
More information3GPP TS V8.2.0 ( )
TS 36.414 V8.2.0 (2008-06) Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network Evolved Universal Terrestrial Access Network (E-UTRAN); S1 data
More informationA common issue that affects the QoS of packetized audio is jitter. Voice data requires a constant packet interarrival rate at receivers to convert
A common issue that affects the QoS of packetized audio is jitter. Voice data requires a constant packet interarrival rate at receivers to convert data into a proper analog signal for playback. The variations
More informationHSTP-IPTV-GUIDE.1 IPTV
I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU Technical Paper (27 October 2017) HSTP-IPTV-GUIDE.1 IPTV service deployment scenarios
More informationISO/IEC 8822 INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Presentation service definition
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 8822 Second edition 1994-12-15 Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Presentation service definition Technologies de / information - lnterconnexion de systemes
More informationArchitectural Approaches to Multi-Homing for IPv6
Architectural Approaches to Multi-Homing for IPv6 A Walk-Through of draft-huston-multi6-architectures-00 Geoff Huston June 2004 Recap Multi-Homing in IPv4 Either: Or: Obtain a local AS Obtain PI space
More informationMinion: An All-Terrain Packet Packhorse to Jump-Start Stalled Internet Transports
Minion: An All-Terrain Packet Packhorse to Jump-Start Stalled Internet Transports Jana Iyengar*, Bryan Ford + Dishant Ailawadi +, Syed Obaid Amin*, Michael F. Nowlan +, Nabin Tiwari*, Jeffrey Wise* *Franklin
More informationPOLICY ROUTING. Licentiate course seminar paper
HELSINKI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Laboratory of Telecommunications Technology Licentiate course seminar, October 1996 Revised, December 1996 Mauri Pännäri POLICY ROUTING Licentiate course seminar paper
More informationSCTP Congestion Window Overgrowth During Changeover
SCTP Congestion Window Overgrowth During Changeover Janardhan R. Iyengar, Armando L. Caro, Jr., Paul D. Amer, Gerard J. Heinz Computer and Information Sciences University of Delaware iyengar, acaro, amer,
More informationFixed Internetworking Protocols and Networks. IP mobility. Rune Hylsberg Jacobsen Aarhus School of Engineering
Fixed Internetworking Protocols and Networks IP mobility Rune Hylsberg Jacobsen Aarhus School of Engineering rhj@iha.dk 1 2011 ITIFN Mobile computing Vision Seamless, ubiquitous network access for mobile
More information3GPP TS V ( )
Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); General aspects and principles
More information03 The Internet Model and TCP/IP
SE 4C03 Winter 2003 03 The Internet Model and TCP/IP Instructor: W. M. Farmer Revised: 16 January 2003 1 The OSI Model In 1977 the International Standards Organization (ISO) offered the Open Systems Interconnection
More informationChapter 2 - Part 1. The TCP/IP Protocol: The Language of the Internet
Chapter 2 - Part 1 The TCP/IP Protocol: The Language of the Internet Protocols A protocol is a language or set of rules that two or more computers use to communicate 2 Protocol Analogy: Phone Call Parties
More informationConfiguring Transports
This module provides information about Nonstop Routing (NSR), Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), User Datagram Protocol (UDP ), and RAW Transports. If you
More informationMultipathTCP. Alan Ford
MultipathTCP Protocol Design Alan Ford alan.ford@roke.co.uk 1 Scope To build TCP modifications to support multipath operation We have more than one implementation already, but this presentation is about
More informationPerformance Evaluation of TCP Multihoming for IPV6 Anycast Networks and Proxy Placement
University of Central Florida Electronic Theses and Dissertations Masters Thesis (Open Access) Performance Evaluation of TCP Multihoming for IPV6 Anycast Networks and Proxy Placement 2015 Raya Alsharfa
More informationTechological Advantages of Mobile IPv6
Techological Advantages of Mobile IPv6 Nokia Research Center Mountain View, CA USA Charles E. Perkins http://people.nokia.net/charliep charliep@iprg.nokia.com 1 NOKIA NERD2000.PPT/ 11/20/00 / HFl Outline
More informationUpdate of C2C-CC Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization
Update of C2C-CC Requirements for NEMO Route Optimization draft-baldessari-c2ccc-nemo-req-01 IETF-69-26/07/2007 - NEMO WG Roberto Baldessari NEC Europe Ltd. Heidelberg Andreas Festag NEC Deutschland GmbH
More information3GPP TS V9.0.0 ( )
TS 25.412 V9.0.0 (2009-12) Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; UTRAN Iu interface signalling transport (Release 9) The present
More informationIntended status: Experimental Expires: January 6, 2011 Aalto University July 5, 2010
AVT Working Group Internet-Draft Intended status: Experimental Expires: January 6, 2011 V. Singh T. Karkkainen J. Ott S. Ahsan Aalto University July 5, 2010 Multipath RTP (MPRTP) draft-singh-avt-mprtp-00
More informationETSI TS V ( )
TS 136 414 V12.1.0 (2015-02) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); S1 data transport (3GPP TS 36.414 version 12.1.0 Release 12) 1 TS 136 414 V12.1.0
More informationIntroduction to IEEE 802.1Qca Path Control and Reservation
www.huawei.com Introduction to IEEE 802.1Qca Path Control and Reservation Authors: Hesham ElBakoury Version: 1.0 HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. GOAL Present the scope main concepts of the new IEEE 802.1Qca
More informationAn Approach to Efficient and Reliable design in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6
An Approach to Efficient and Reliable design in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Taewan You 1, Seungyun Lee 1, Sangheon Pack 2, and Yanghee Choi 2 1 Protocol Engineering Center, ETRI, 161 Gajoung-dong, Yusong-gu,
More informationIPv6-based Beyond-3G Networking
IPv6-based Beyond-3G Networking Motorola Labs Abstract This paper highlights the technical issues in IPv6-based Beyond-3G networking as a means to enable a seamless mobile Internet beyond simply wireless
More informationA Evolvable RANGI Transition Strategy
A Evolvable RANGI Transition Strategy 1 Overview 5 Types of Sites: Progressive deployment of RANGI Interoperability between Type i and j (Total 10 cases) More RANGI deployment Smaller BGP Tables Less Address
More informationITU-T J.288. Encapsulation of type length value (TLV) packet for cable transmission systems
I n t e r n a t i o n a l T e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n U n i o n ITU-T J.288 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU (03/2016) SERIES J: CABLE NETWORKS AND TRANSMISSION OF TELEVISION, SOUND
More informationTop-Down Network Design
Top-Down Network Design Chapter Seven Selecting Switching and Routing Protocols Original slides by Cisco Press & Priscilla Oppenheimer Selection Criteria for Switching and Routing Protocols Network traffic
More informationTD 521 (GEN/11) STUDY GROUP 11. English only Original: English TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR. Question(s): 15/11 Geneva, 10 September 2010
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION STUDY GROUP 11 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR STUDY PERIOD 2009-2012 English only Original: English Question(s): 15/11 Geneva, 10 September 2010 Source:
More informationRequest for Comments: 1787 T.J. Watson Research Center, IBM Corp. Category: Informational April 1995
Network Working Group Y. Rekhter Request for Comments: 1787 T.J. Watson Research Center, IBM Corp. Category: Informational April 1995 Status of this Memo Routing in a Multi-provider Internet This memo
More informationISO IEC. INTERNATIONAL ISO/IEC STANDARD Information technology Fibre Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) Part 5: Hybrid Ring Control (HRC)
INTERNATIONAL ISO/IEC STANDARD 9314-5 First edition 1995-02-01 Information technology Fibre Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) Part 5: Hybrid Ring Control (HRC) Technologies de l'information Interface de
More informationLoad Balancing Technology White Paper
Load Balancing Technology White Paper Keywords: Server, gateway, link, load balancing, SLB, LLB Abstract: This document describes the background, implementation, and operating mechanism of the load balancing
More informationCisco Unified MeetingPlace Integration
CHAPTER 14 This chapter covers system-level design and implementation of Cisco Unified MeetingPlace 5.4 in a Cisco Unified Communications Manager 5.x environment. The following aspects of design and configuration
More informationStandards for C-ITS ESF GmbH, Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer Fichtenweg 9, D Blaubeuren, Germany
Introduction Standards for C-ITS ESF GmbH, Dr. Hans-Joachim Fischer Fichtenweg 9, D-89143 Blaubeuren, Germany http://fischer-tech.eu, HJFischer@fischer-tech.eu : document may be reproduced and distributed
More informationETSI TS V ( )
Technical Specification LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); General aspects and principles for interfaces supporting Multimedia Broadcast Multicast Service (MBMS) within
More informationIPv6 deployment at Google
IPv6 deployment at Google Lorenzo Colitti, Angus Lees {lorenzo,alees}@google.com Why? Why IPv6? When the day comes that users only have IPv6, Google needs to be there If we can serve our users better over
More informationETSI TS V (201
TS 136 424 V13.0.0 (201 16-01) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); X2 data transport (3GPP TS 36.424 version 13.0.0 Release 13) 1 TS 136 424 V13.0.0
More information3GPP TS V8.0.0 ( )
TS 36.414 V8.0.0 (2007-12) Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network Evolved Universal Terrestrial Access Network (E-UTRAN); S1 data
More informationAMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD
ENGINEERING COMMITTEE Data Standards Subcommittee AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD ANSI/SCTE 173-3 2017 Specification for Authentication in Preferential Telecommunications over IPCablecom2 Networks NOTICE The
More informationModule 16: Distributed System Structures. Operating System Concepts 8 th Edition,
Module 16: Distributed System Structures, Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne 2009 Chapter 16: Distributed System Structures Motivation Types of Network-Based Operating Systems Network Structure Network Topology
More informationSquare Pegs in a Round Pipe: Wire-Compatible Unordered Delivery In TCP and TLS
Square Pegs in a Round Pipe: Wire-Compatible Unordered Delivery In TCP and TLS Jana Iyengar*, Bryan Ford + Syed Obaid Amin* +, Michael F. Nowlan +, Nabin Tiwari* *Franklin & Marshall College + Yale University
More informationETSI TS V ( )
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); M1 data transport () 1 Reference RTS/TSGR-0336445vf00 Keywords LTE 650 Route des Lucioles F-06921 Sophia Antipolis
More informationIP Mobility vs. Session Mobility
IP Mobility vs. Session Mobility Securing wireless communication is a formidable task, something that many companies are rapidly learning the hard way. IP level solutions become extremely cumbersome when
More informationISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Cloud computing Reference architecture
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 17789 First edition 2014-10-15 Information technology Cloud computing Reference architecture Technologies de l'information Informatique en nuage Architecture de référence
More informationVXLAN Overview: Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches
White Paper VXLAN Overview: Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches What You Will Learn Traditional network segmentation has been provided by VLANs that are standardized under the IEEE 802.1Q group. VLANs provide
More informationTD 95 Rev.1 (GEN/11) STUDY GROUP 11. English only Original: English TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION STUDY GROUP 11 TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR STUDY PERIOD 2009-2012 English only Original: English Question(s): 15/11 Geneva, 19-23 January 2009 Source:
More informationETSI TS V9.0.0 ( ) Technical Specification
TS 125 412 V9.0.0 (2010-01) Technical Specification Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); UTRAN Iu interface signalling transport (3GPP TS 25.412 version 9.0.0 Release 9) 1 TS 125 412 V9.0.0
More informationIPv6: An Introduction
Outline IPv6: An Introduction Dheeraj Sanghi Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur dheeraj@iitk.ac.in http://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/dheeraj Problems with
More informationETSI TS V ( )
TS 138 472 V15.1.0 (2018-07) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 5G; NG-RAN; F1 signalling transport (3GPP TS 38.472 version 15.1.0 Release 15) 1 TS 138 472 V15.1.0 (2018-07) Reference DTS/TSGR-0338472vf10 Keywords
More informationTag Switching. Background. Tag-Switching Architecture. Forwarding Component CHAPTER
CHAPTER 23 Tag Switching Background Rapid changes in the type (and quantity) of traffic handled by the Internet and the explosion in the number of Internet users is putting an unprecedented strain on the
More informationETSI TS V ( )
TS 125 432 V11.0.0 (2012-10) Technical Specification Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); UTRAN Iub interface: signalling transport (3GPP TS 25.432 version 11.0.0 Release 11) 1 TS 125 432
More informationIPv6: Are we really ready to turn off IPv4? Geoff Huston APNIC
IPv6: Are we really ready to turn off IPv4? Geoff Huston APNIC The IPv6 Timeline 1990 2000 2010 2020 The IPv6 Timeline Yes, we ve been working on this for close to 30 years! 1990 2000 2010 2020 In-situ
More information3GPP TS V ( )
TS 23.261 V10.0.0 (2010-06) Technical Specification 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects; IP flow mobility and seamless Wirless Local Area Network
More informationETSI TS V ( )
TS 136 424 V15.0.0 (2018-09) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); X2 data transport (3GPP TS 36.424 version 15.0.0 Release 15) 1 TS 136 424 V15.0.0
More informationPart 5: Protocol specifications
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 9594-5 Eighth edition 2017-05 Information technology Open Systems Interconnection The Directory Part 5: Protocol specifications Technologies de l information Interconnexion
More informationDecoding MPLS-TP and the deployment possibilities
White Paper Decoding MPLS-TP and the deployment possibilities Abstract Over the past few years, leading communications service providers and a number of NE (network element) suppliers have supported the
More informationPart 1: Introduction. Goal: Review of how the Internet works Overview
Part 1: Introduction Goal: Review of how the Internet works Overview Get context Get overview, feel of the Internet Application layer protocols and addressing Network layer / Routing Link layer / Example
More informationComparision study of MobileIPv4 and MobileIPv6
Comparision study of MobileIPv4 and MobileIPv6 Dr. Sridevi Assistant Professor, Dept. of Computer Science, Karnatak University,Dharwad Abstract: IPv4 is being replaced by IPv6 due to the increased demand
More information