Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines

Transcription

1 Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines Reinhard von Hanxleden Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics Real-Time Systems and Embedded Systems Group Christian-Albrecht Universität zu Kiel MARTES 06, October 2006

2 Contents Introduction Style Checking in Statecharts The Style Checker Summary & Conclusion Appendix Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 2/11

3 Introduction Motivation realistic Statecharts possess high complexity size side effects misunderstanding potential errors can be subtle and hard to locate for humans tools provide restricted facilities to avoid modeling errors Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 3/11

4 Introduction Motivation realistic Statecharts possess high complexity size side effects misunderstanding potential errors can be subtle and hard to locate for humans tools provide restricted facilities to avoid modeling errors Purpose formulate profiles of robustness rules as a Statechart modeling style guide avoid errors, improve readability and maintainability establishment of automatic Statechart analysis in a highly configurable tool Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 3/11

5 Modeling Errors with Statecharts Humans tend to digress, err, and diversify. Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 4/11

6 Modeling Errors with Statecharts Humans tend to digress, err, and diversify. Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 4/11

7 Style Checking in Statecharts Static Analysis of Statecharts Syntactic Correctness Style Checking in Statecharts Error prevention: human code review dynamic testing Model Checking Style Checking Syntactic Analysis Semantic Robustness Readability Efficiency Syntactic Robustness Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 5/11

8 Style Checking in Statecharts Static Analysis of Statecharts Syntactic Correctness Style Checking in Statecharts Error prevention: human code review dynamic testing Model Checking Style Checking Syntactic Analysis Semantic Robustness Statechart Robustness: syntactic and semantic style Readability Efficiency Syntactic Robustness gather from element correlation Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 5/11

9 Style Checking Tools for Statecharts Robustness KIEL Checking Rule Checker State Analyzer Mint Guideline-Checker Layout Style Mint/Guideline-Checker: related to Matlab/Simulink/Stateflow trivial graphical and syntactic checks State Analyzer: related to Statemate automated theorem proving Problem Specific Rule Checker: related to UML checking with Java and OCL interpreting OCL Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 6/11

10 A Statechart Style Guide operational instructions for humans and configuration for automated analysis set of 41 wellformedness-, syntactic, and semantic rules defines a subset of the language Statechart Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 7/11

11 A Statechart Style Guide operational instructions for humans and configuration for automated analysis set of 41 wellformedness-, syntactic, and semantic rules defines a subset of the language Statechart Connectivity Syntactic Rules Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 7/11

12 A Statechart Style Guide operational instructions for humans and configuration for automated analysis set of 41 wellformedness-, syntactic, and semantic rules defines a subset of the language Statechart Dwelling Connectivity Syntactic Rules Overlapping Transitions Semantic Rules Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 7/11

13 Checking: The Environment Kiel Integrated Environment for Layout modeling environment to explore the visualization and intuitive comprehend complex reactive systems provides a simulation based on dynamic focus-and-context KIEL s generic concept of Statecharts can be adaptated to specific notations and semantics imports, visualizes, and simulates Statecharts created with Esterel Studio, Stateflow, UML tools via XMI format Statechart synthesis from textual languages (e. g. Esterel) structural Statechart optimization for compactness and readability Steffen Prochnow and Reinhard von Hanxleden. Comfortable Modeling of Complex Reactive Systems. In Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE 06), Munich, March Steffen Prochnow, Claus Traulsen, and Reinhard von Hanxleden. Synthesizing Safe State Machines from Esterel. In Proceedings of ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems (LCTES 06), Ottawa, Canada, June Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 8/11

14 Checking: The Plug-In Syntactical Checks/Wellformedness: adopted OCL to KOCL rule UML13CompositeStateRule1 { declarations { message "A composite state can have...";} constraint { context ORState or Region; "self.subnodes->select( v v.oclistypeof(initialstate))-> size<=1";} fails {message;}} Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 9/11

15 Checking: The Plug-In Syntactical Checks/Wellformedness: adopted OCL to KOCL transformation into executable Java code Java Code Snippet OCL Constraint KIEL Datastructure Meta-model rule UML13CompositeStateRule1 { declarations { message "A composite state can have...";} constraint { context ORState or Region; "self.subnodes->select( v v.oclistypeof(initialstate))-> size<=1";} fails {message;}} Java Code for Checking Dresden OCL-Toolkit Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 9/11

16 Checking: The Plug-In Syntactical Checks/Wellformedness: adopted OCL to KOCL transformation into executable Java code Java Code Snippet OCL Constraint KIEL Datastructure Meta-model rule UML13CompositeStateRule1 { declarations { message "A composite state can have...";} constraint { context ORState or Region; "self.subnodes->select( v v.oclistypeof(initialstate))-> size<=1";} fails {message;}} Java Code for Checking Dresden OCL-Toolkit Semantical Checks: using of a theorem prover (CVC Lite) e. g. detecting a non-dwelling state: ((e 1 c 1 ) (e 2 c 2 )) implementation of JNI communication with SWIG Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 9/11

17 Demo: Error Checking Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 10/11

18 Summary & Conclusion Contributions: Comprehensive Statechart Style Guide Syntactic and Semantic analyses Transformative Approach for OCL usage Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 11/11

19 Summary & Conclusion Contributions: Comprehensive Statechart Style Guide Syntactic and Semantic analyses Transformative Approach for OCL usage Conclusion: OCL sufficient for most of our checks OCL rule specification is much faster then programming OCL doesn t fit all intended Statechart analyses: theorem proving was necessary Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 11/11

20 Summary & Conclusion Contributions: Comprehensive Statechart Style Guide Syntactic and Semantic analyses Transformative Approach for OCL usage Conclusion: OCL sufficient for most of our checks OCL rule specification is much faster then programming OCL doesn t fit all intended Statechart analyses: theorem proving was necessary We look for realistic models to apply our checks! thanks! questions or comments? Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 11/11

21 Appendix: SWIG Workflow CVCL.h files manual annotation SWIG interface definition file Java Wrapper Classes SWIG Java Native Interface (JNI) KIEL Checking Plug-In SWIG C++ wapper for CVCL library CVCL C++ library C++ Wrapper Classes CVCL C++ library uses Java wrapper classes for CVCL communication through JNI gcc wrapped CVCL libraray, JNI enabled (a) The SWIG Workflow (b) Composition of Wrapper Layers Figure: Interfacing of KIEL and the CVC Lite Library via JNI and SWIG. Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 11/11

22 Appendix: Further Rules Dwelling Connectivity DefaultTransition Syntactic Rules Overlapping Transitions Semantic Rules Read/Write Race Condition Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 11/11

23 Appendix: Bibliography Miltiadis Moutos, Albrecht Korn, and Carsten Fisel. Guideline-Checker. Studienarbeit, University of Applied Sciences in Esslingen, June Christian Scheidler. Systems Engineering for Time Triggered Architectures. SETTA Consortium, Deliverable D7.3 Final Document. Martin Mutz and Michaela Huhn. Automated statechart analysis for user-defined design rules. Technical report, Technische Universität Braunschweig, David M. Beazley. SWIG: An easy to use tool for integrating scripting languages with C and C++. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual USENIX Tcl/Tk Workshop, pages , Clark W. Barrett and Sergey Berezin. CVC Lite: A new implementation of the Cooperating Validity Checker Category B. In Rajeev Alur and Doron A. Peled, editors, Proceedings of Computer Aided Verification: 16th International Conference, CAV 2004, Boston, volume 3114 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages Springer, Steffen Prochnow and Reinhard von Hanxleden. Comfortable Modeling of Complex Reactive Systems. In Proceedings of Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE 06), Munich, March Steffen Prochnow, Claus Traulsen, and Reinhard von Hanxleden. Synthesizing Safe State Machines from Esterel. In Proceedings of ACM SIGPLAN/SIGBED Conference on Languages, Compilers, and Tools for Embedded Systems (LCTES 06), Ottawa, Canada, June Reinhard von Hanxleden Analyzing Robustness of UML State Machines 11/11