Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 128 PageID: 1. Of Counsel:
|
|
|
- Evangeline Williams
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 128 PageID: 1 Charles M. Lizza William C. Baton SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520 Newark, NJ (973) Attorneys for Plaintiffs Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, and Cilag GmbH International Of Counsel: Joseph M. O Malley, Jr. Eric W. Dittmann Hassen A. Sayeed PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY Attorneys for Plaintiff Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. Raymond N. Nimrod Matthew A. Traupman Catherine T. Mattes QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY Attorneys for Plaintiffs Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, and Cilag GmbH International UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MITSUBISHI TANABE PHARMA CORPORATION, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA NV, JANSSEN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC, and CILAG GMBH INTERNATIONAL, v. Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT (Filed Electronically) PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC., Defendant.
2 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 2 of 128 PageID: 2 Plaintiffs Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. ( MTPC ), Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ( JPI ), Janssen Pharmaceutica NV ( JNV ), Janssen Research and Development, LLC ( JRD ), and Cilag GmbH International ( Cilag ) (collectively, Plaintiffs ), for their Complaint against Defendant Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc. ( Prinston or Defendant ), hereby allege as follows: THE PARTIES 1. MTPC is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan, having its principal place of business at , Dosho-Machi, Chuo-ku, Osaka-Shi, Osaka Japan. 2. JPI is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania, having its principal place of business at 1125 Trenton-Harbourton Road, Titusville, New Jersey JNV is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Belgium, having its principal place of business at Turnhoutseweg, 30, B-2340 Beerse, Belgium. 4. JRD is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Jersey, having its principal place of business at 920 Route 202, Raritan, New Jersey Cilag is a company organized and existing under the laws of Switzerland, having its principal place of business at Gubelstrasse 34, 6300, Zug, Switzerland. 6. On information and belief, defendant Prinston is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal place of business at 2002 Eastpark Boulevard, Cranbury, New Jersey
3 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 3 of 128 PageID: 3 NATURE OF THE ACTION 7. This is a civil action for infringement of United States Patent No. 7,943,788 ( the 788 patent or the patent-in-suit ). This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 100 et seq., as well as the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C JURISDICTION AND VENUE 8. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C and 1338(a) and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C This Court may declare the rights and other legal relations of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C because this case is an actual controversy within the Court s jurisdiction. 10. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Prinston because, inter alia, Prinston has committed an act of patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2) and intends a future course of conduct that includes acts of patent infringement in New Jersey. These acts have led and will lead to foreseeable harm and injury to Plaintiffs in New Jersey. For example, on information and belief, following approval of ANDA No , Prinston will make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import its proposed generic versions of JPI s Invokana brand products in the United States, including in New Jersey, prior to the expiration of the patent-in-suit. 11. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Prinston because, inter alia, this action arises from actions of Prinston directed toward New Jersey. For example, Prinston counsel sent a letter dated March 27, 2018 to JPI, a corporation with its principal place of business in this Judicial District stating that Prinston had submitted ANDA No seeking approval to commercially manufacture, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import its proposed generic versions of JPI s Invokana brand products prior to the expiration of the patent-in-suit. If Prinston succeeds in -3-
4 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 4 of 128 PageID: 4 obtaining FDA approval, it would sell its proposed generic versions of JPI s Invokana brand products in New Jersey and other states, causing injury to Plaintiffs in New Jersey. 12. The Court also has personal jurisdiction over Prinston because Prinston has purposefully availed itself of the rights and benefits of New Jersey law by engaging in systematic and continuous contacts with the State of New Jersey. On information and belief, Prinston regularly and continuously transacts business within New Jersey, including by selling pharmaceutical products in New Jersey. On information and belief, Prinston derives substantial revenue from the sale of those products in New Jersey and has availed itself of the privilege of conducting business within New Jersey. 13. On information and belief, Prinston has continuously placed its products into the stream of commerce for distribution and consumption in the State of New Jersey and throughout the United States, and thus has engaged in the regular conduct of business within this Judicial District. 14. On information and belief, Prinston derives substantial revenue from selling generic pharmaceutical products throughout the United States, including in this Judicial District. 15. On information and belief, Prinston has previously invoked, stipulated, and/or consented to personal jurisdiction in this Judicial District in numerous prior patent cases. 16. Prinston has previously been sued in this Judicial District and has availed itself of New Jersey courts through the assertion of counterclaims in suits brought in New Jersey, including Forest Laboratories, LLC, et al. v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc., et al., Civil Action No (D.N.J.) (not contesting personal jurisdiction or venue and asserting counterclaims); Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., et al. v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc., et al., Civil Action No (D.N.J.) (not contesting personal jurisdiction or venue and asserting counterclaims); Sebela International Limited, et al. v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc., et al., Civil Action No. -4-
5 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 5 of 128 PageID: (D.N.J.) (not contesting personal jurisdiction or venue and asserting counterclaims); and Takeda GmbH, et al. v. Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc., Civil Action No (D.N.J.) (not contesting personal jurisdiction or venue and asserting counterclaims). 17. Venue is proper in this Court as to Prinston pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), (c), and/or (d), and 1400(b) because Prinston has committed and will commit further acts of infringement in this Judicial District. Venue is also proper in this Court as to Prinston because Prinston has a regular and established place of business in New Jersey. THE PATENT-IN-SUIT 18. On May 17, 2011, the 788 patent, titled, Glucopyranoside Compound, was duly and legally issued to MTPC as assignee. A copy of the 788 patent is attached as Exhibit A. 19. JPI, JRD, and Cilag are exclusive licensees of the 788 patent. 20. JNV is an exclusive sublicensee of the 788 patent. 21. JPI holds approved New Drug Application ( NDA ) No for canagliflozin tablets, which are prescribed and sold under the trademark Invokana. 22. Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 355(b)(l), the 788 patent is listed in the United States Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) publication titled Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations (also known as the Orange Book ) as covering JPI s Invokana brand canagliflozin. ACTS GIVING RISE TO THIS ACTION COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF THE 788 PATENT BY PRINSTON S ANDA FOR INVOKANA 23. Plaintiffs reallege paragraphs 1-22 as if fully set forth herein. 24. On information and belief, Prinston submitted ANDA No to the FDA under 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)). ANDA No. -5-
6 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 6 of 128 PageID: seeks the FDA approval necessary to engage in the commercial manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale in, and/or importation into the United States, including the State of New Jersey, of generic 100 mg and 300 mg canagliflozin tablets prior to the expiration of certain of MTPC s Orange Book-listed patents. ANDA No specifically seeks FDA approval to market a generic version of JPI s Invokana brand 100 mg and 300 mg canagliflozin tablets prior to the expiration of the 788 patent. 25. On information and belief, ANDA No includes a Paragraph IV Certification that the claims of the 788 patent are invalid. 26. Plaintiffs commenced this action within 45 days of the date of receipt of Prinston s March 27, 2018 Paragraph IV Certification Notice Letter. 27. Prinston s submission to the FDA of ANDA No , including the 505(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV) allegations, constitutes infringement of the 788 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(2)(A). 28. Plaintiffs are entitled to a declaration that, if Prinston commercially manufactures, uses, offers for sale, or sells its proposed generic versions of JPI s Invokana brand products within the United States, imports its proposed generic versions of JPI s Invokana brand products into the United States, and/or induces or contributes to such conduct, Prinston will infringe at least claims 12 and 20 of the 788 patent under 35 U.S.C. 271(a), (b), and/or (c). 29. Plaintiffs will be irreparably harmed by Prinston s infringing activities unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Plaintiffs do not have an adequate remedy at law. 30. This case is an exceptional one, and Plaintiffs are entitled to an award of their reasonable attorneys fees under 35 U.S.C
7 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 7 of 128 PageID: 7 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that: A. A Judgment be entered declaring that Prinston has infringed one or more claims of the 788 patent by submitting ANDA No ; B. An Order be issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271(e)(4)(A) that the effective date of any approval of ANDA No be a date that is not earlier than the expiration date of the 788 patent, or any later expiration of exclusivity for any of those patents to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled; C. An Order be issued that Prinston, its officers, agents, servants, and employees, and those persons in active concert or participation with them, are preliminarily and permanently enjoined from commercially manufacturing, using, offering for sale, selling, or importing the proposed generic versions of JPI s Invokana brand canagliflozin tablets identified in this Complaint, and any other product that infringes or induces or contributes to the infringement of the 788 patent, prior to its expiration, including any extensions to which Plaintiffs are or become entitled; D. If Prinston engages in the commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, and/or importation into the United States of the proposed generic versions of JPI s Invokana brand canagliflozin tablets identified in this Complaint prior to the expiration of the 788 patent, a Judgment awarding damages to Plaintiffs resulting from such infringement together with interest; E. Attorneys fees in this action as an exceptional case pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; F. Costs and expenses in this action; and G. Plaintiffs be awarded such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. -7-
8 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 8 of 128 PageID: 8 Dated: April 11, 2018 Of Counsel: Joseph M. O Malley, Jr. Eric W. Dittmann Hassen A. Sayeed PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY Attorneys for Plaintiff Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. Raymond N. Nimrod Matthew A. Traupman Catherine T. Mattes QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY By: s/ Charles M. Lizza Charles M. Lizza William C. Baton SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520 Newark, NJ (973) clizza@saul.com wbaton@saul.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, and Cilag GmbH International Attorneys for Plaintiffs Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, and Cilag GmbH International -8-
9 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 9 of 128 PageID: 9 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULES 11.2 & 40.1 I hereby certify that the matters captioned Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, et al. v. Sandoz Inc., et al., Civil Action No (FLW)(DEA), Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, et al. v. InvaGen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Civil Action No (FLW)(DEA), and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, et al. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA Inc., Civil Action No (FLW)(DEA) are related to the matter in controversy because the matter in controversy involves at least one of the same patents. I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the matter in controversy is not the subject of any other action pending in any court or of any pending arbitration or administrative proceeding. Dated: April 11, 2018 Of Counsel: Joseph M. O Malley, Jr. Eric W. Dittmann Hassen A. Sayeed PAUL HASTINGS LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY Attorneys for Plaintiff Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp. Raymond N. Nimrod Matthew A. Traupman Catherine T. Mattes QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY By: s/ Charles M. Lizza Charles M. Lizza William C. Baton SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520 Newark, NJ (973) clizza@saul.com wbaton@saul.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, and Cilag GmbH International Attorneys for Plaintiffs Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, Janssen Research and Development, LLC, and Cilag GmbH International -9-
10 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 10 of 128 PageID: 10 EXHIBIT A
11 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 11 of 128 PageID: 11
12 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 12 of 128 PageID: 12
13 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 13 of 128 PageID: 13
14 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 14 of 128 PageID: 14
15 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 15 of 128 PageID: 15
16 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 16 of 128 PageID: 16
17 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 17 of 128 PageID: 17
18 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 18 of 128 PageID: 18
19 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 19 of 128 PageID: 19
20 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 20 of 128 PageID: 20
21 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 21 of 128 PageID: 21
22 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 22 of 128 PageID: 22
23 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 23 of 128 PageID: 23
24 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 24 of 128 PageID: 24
25 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 25 of 128 PageID: 25
26 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 26 of 128 PageID: 26
27 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 27 of 128 PageID: 27
28 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 28 of 128 PageID: 28
29 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 29 of 128 PageID: 29
30 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 30 of 128 PageID: 30
31 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 31 of 128 PageID: 31
32 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 32 of 128 PageID: 32
33 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 33 of 128 PageID: 33
34 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 34 of 128 PageID: 34
35 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 35 of 128 PageID: 35
36 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 36 of 128 PageID: 36
37 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 37 of 128 PageID: 37
38 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 38 of 128 PageID: 38
39 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 39 of 128 PageID: 39
40 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 40 of 128 PageID: 40
41 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 41 of 128 PageID: 41
42 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 42 of 128 PageID: 42
43 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 43 of 128 PageID: 43
44 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 44 of 128 PageID: 44
45 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 45 of 128 PageID: 45
46 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 46 of 128 PageID: 46
47 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 47 of 128 PageID: 47
48 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 48 of 128 PageID: 48
49 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 49 of 128 PageID: 49
50 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 50 of 128 PageID: 50
51 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 51 of 128 PageID: 51
52 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 52 of 128 PageID: 52
53 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 53 of 128 PageID: 53
54 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 54 of 128 PageID: 54
55 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 55 of 128 PageID: 55
56 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 56 of 128 PageID: 56
57 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 57 of 128 PageID: 57
58 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 58 of 128 PageID: 58
59 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 59 of 128 PageID: 59
60 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 60 of 128 PageID: 60
61 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 61 of 128 PageID: 61
62 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 62 of 128 PageID: 62
63 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 63 of 128 PageID: 63
64 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 64 of 128 PageID: 64
65 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 65 of 128 PageID: 65
66 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 66 of 128 PageID: 66
67 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 67 of 128 PageID: 67
68 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 68 of 128 PageID: 68
69 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 69 of 128 PageID: 69
70 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 70 of 128 PageID: 70
71 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 71 of 128 PageID: 71
72 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 72 of 128 PageID: 72
73 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 73 of 128 PageID: 73
74 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 74 of 128 PageID: 74
75 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 75 of 128 PageID: 75
76 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 76 of 128 PageID: 76
77 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 77 of 128 PageID: 77
78 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 78 of 128 PageID: 78
79 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 79 of 128 PageID: 79
80 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 80 of 128 PageID: 80
81 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 81 of 128 PageID: 81
82 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 82 of 128 PageID: 82
83 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 83 of 128 PageID: 83
84 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 84 of 128 PageID: 84
85 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 85 of 128 PageID: 85
86 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 86 of 128 PageID: 86
87 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 87 of 128 PageID: 87
88 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 88 of 128 PageID: 88
89 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 89 of 128 PageID: 89
90 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 90 of 128 PageID: 90
91 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 91 of 128 PageID: 91
92 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 92 of 128 PageID: 92
93 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 93 of 128 PageID: 93
94 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 94 of 128 PageID: 94
95 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 95 of 128 PageID: 95
96 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 96 of 128 PageID: 96
97 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 97 of 128 PageID: 97
98 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 98 of 128 PageID: 98
99 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 99 of 128 PageID: 99
100 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 100 of 128 PageID: 100
101 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 101 of 128 PageID: 101
102 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 102 of 128 PageID: 102
103 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 103 of 128 PageID: 103
104 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 104 of 128 PageID: 104
105 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 105 of 128 PageID: 105
106 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 106 of 128 PageID: 106
107 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 107 of 128 PageID: 107
108 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 108 of 128 PageID: 108
109 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 109 of 128 PageID: 109
110 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 110 of 128 PageID: 110
111 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 111 of 128 PageID: 111
112 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 112 of 128 PageID: 112
113 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 113 of 128 PageID: 113
114 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 114 of 128 PageID: 114
115 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 115 of 128 PageID: 115
116 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 116 of 128 PageID: 116
117 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 117 of 128 PageID: 117
118 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 118 of 128 PageID: 118
119 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 119 of 128 PageID: 119
120 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 120 of 128 PageID: 120
121 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 121 of 128 PageID: 121
122 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 122 of 128 PageID: 122
123 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 123 of 128 PageID: 123
124 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 124 of 128 PageID: 124
125 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 125 of 128 PageID: 125
126 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 126 of 128 PageID: 126
127 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 127 of 128 PageID: 127
128 Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 128 of 128 PageID: 128
Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01268 Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SMART AUTHENTICATION IP, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil
Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00194 Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SEMCON IP INC., v. Plaintiff, TCT MOBILE INTERNATIONAL
Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-05460 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Sharpe Innovations, Inc., Plaintiff,
Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:12-cv-00473-SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., vs. Plaintiff, SIERRA WIRELESS,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-662
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TELINIT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-662 v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MICROSOFT CORPORATION; SKYPE
Case 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2017 Page 1 of 21
Case :-cv--fam Document Entered on FLSD Docket 0//0 Page of 0 0 Coleman Watson, Esq. Watson LLP S. Orange Avenue, Suite 0 Orlando, FL 0 coleman@watsonllp.com CODING TECHNOLGIES, LLC, vs. Plaintiff, MERCEDES-BENZ
Case 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 2:14-cv-00182-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JOHN B. ADRAIN, Plaintiff, vs. HIKVISION
Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00276 Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
Case 1:99-mc Document 298 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 298 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 17417 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., vs. Plaintiff, LG ELECTRONICS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION HERTL MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT CASE AMAZON.COM, INC., Defendant. COMPLAINT Plaintiff Hertl Media,
Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 6:15-cv-01006 Document 1 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC., and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
Case: 5:10-cv SL Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/30/10 1 of 8. PageID #: 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 5:10-cv-01108-SL Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/30/10 1 of 8. PageID #: 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VIDEO PRODUCTS INC. 1275 Danner Drive Aurora, Ohio
Case 1:17-cv PBS Document 12 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:17-cv-11642-PBS Document 12 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ALTOVA GMBH and ALTOVA INC., Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-11642-PBS Plaintiffs,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *
ALVERSON, TAYLOR, MORTENSEN & SANDERS KURT R. BONDS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. ADAM R. KNECHT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 W. Charleston Boulevard Las Vegas, NV efile@alversontaylor.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ALVERSON,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 DANIEL JOHNSON, JR. (SBN 0) MICHAEL J. LYONS (SBN 0) AHREN C. HSU-HOFFMAN (SBN 0) COREY R. HOUMAND (SBN ) Palo Alto Square 000 El Camino Real, Suite 00 Palo Alto, California 0-1 Telephone:
Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Case 5:15-cv-00128 Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION VENADIUM LLC, v. Plaintiff, LENOVO (UNITED STATES)
Case 1:99-mc Document 341 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 341 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 33145 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BUYERLEVERAGE EMAIL SOLUTIONS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No: ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION REEF MOUNTAIN LLC, Plaintiff, Case No: vs. PATENT CASE SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., Defendant. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:12-cv-00483-SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. vs. Plaintiff, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
Case 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Case 5:15-cv-00131 Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION VENADIUM LLC, v. Plaintiff, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
Case 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1
Case 6:16-cv-00224 Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC., and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:17-cv-01586-UNA Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PURE DATA SYSTEMS, LLC Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
ANDREW Y. PIATNICIA (Bar No. 1) andy@piatnicialegal.com Piatnicia Legal Prospect Rd., No. San Jose, CA (0) 1- Attorney for Plaintiffs Asus Computer International ASUSTeK Computer Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT
AIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IC DISPLAY SYSTEMS LLC, AIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. ACER INC., and ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. COMPLAINT
Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/01/18 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:18-cv-00982-UNA Document 1 Filed 07/01/18 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BECK BRANCH LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNIFY INC. DBA UNIFY ENTERPRISE
Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00746-JRG Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KYOTOCOOLING NORTH AMERICA, LLC and AIR ENTERPRISES ACQUISITION LLC, Plaintiffs, v. NORTEK AIR SOLUTIONS, LLC, and
Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 86 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 771
Case 2:17-cv-00275-JRG Document 86 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 771 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. et al Plaintiffs, v.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC., and Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-2118 UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A., Plaintiffs, v. PATENT CASE AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., v. Plaintiffs, CHIEF ARCHITECT, INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-421
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, v. Plaintiff, TREEFROG DEVELOPMENTS INC. d/b/a LIFEPROOF, a
Case 3:08-cv G Document 74 Filed 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-00340-G Document 74 Filed 04/20/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, VS. Plaintiff, WIRELESS
Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 4:17-cv-00863 Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DYNAMIC APPLET TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. Plaintiff, HAVERTY FURNITURE
Case 8:17-cv JSM-TBM Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1
Case 8:17-cv-00619-JSM-TBM Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMP A DIVISION LIBYA TELECOM AND TECHNOLOGY ) CO. and THE
Case 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:18-cv-00850-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/05/18 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SATIUS HOLDING, INC., v. Plaintiff, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:17-cv-00752-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE KALDREN LLC Plaintiff, v. KIK US, INC. Defendant. C.A. No. JURY
Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NEWARK VICINAGE
Case 2:17-cv-02794 Document 1 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NEWARK VICINAGE KEYNETIK, INC., Plaintiff, C.A. NO. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
Case 1:12-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:12-cv-01158-SLR Document 1 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. vs. Plaintiff, HTC CORP. (A/K/A
Case 1:13-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/17/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:13-cv-01090-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/17/13 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SAFE STORAGE LLC, v. Plaintiff, ATTO TECHNOLOGY, INC., HUAWEI
Case: 3:18-cv JJH Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/18/18 1 of 12. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TOLEDO
Case: 3:18-cv-01146-JJH Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/18/18 1 of 12. PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION TOLEDO Spangler Candy Company 400 North Portland Street Bryan,
Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00074 Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION BOOKIT OY AJANVARAUSPALVELU, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-02577 v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION AND BANK OF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00362
DATAMOTION TEXAS, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00362 ZIX CORPORATION, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC., and ZTE SOLUTIONS,
Case 1:99-mc Document 316 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 316 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 30769 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INC., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No.: SONY ERICSSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION PATENT CASE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:16-cv-01314 Document 1 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 27 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-01314 TYPEMOCK, LTD., v. TELERIK INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Plaintiff,
Case 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 01/03/14 Page 1 of 49 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:14-cv-00004-UNA Document 1 Filed 01/03/14 Page 1 of 49 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MPHJ TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS, LLC, v. DILLARD S, INC., Plaintiff,
Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00851 Document 1 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION UNILOC 2017 LLC and UNILOC LICENSING USA, LLC, v. APPLE INC.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Stanley W. Parry, Esq. State Bar No. 1417 Glenn M. Machado, Esq. State Bar No. 7802 CURRAN & PARRY 300 South Fourth Street, Suite 1201 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 471-7000 Stephen N. Zack, Esq. Mark
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN NOKIA CORPORATION v. Plaintiff, APPLE INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. 10CV249 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:17-cv-00184-UNA Document 1 Filed 02/22/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FÖRDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG
Case 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 185 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 2095
Case 1:15-cv-00659-JMS-MJD Document 185 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 2095 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) UNITED STATES SECURITIES ) AND EXCHANGE
Case 8:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 H.H. (SHASHI) KEWALRAMANI S H K Legal, APC P.O. Box Anaheim, CA 0 Telephone: () -0 Fax: () - Email: shashi@shklegal.com JONATHAN T. SUDER (Pro Hac
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF TRADEMARK NON-INFRINGEMENT, TRADEMARK NON-DILUTION, FOR NO UNFAIR COMPETITION AND FOR NO BREACH OF CONTRACT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------x : JOHN MCAFEE and MGT CAPITAL : Civil Action No.: INVESTMENTS, INC,
Case: 1:11-cv TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/27/11 Page: 1 of 20 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 1:11-cv-00347-TSB Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/27/11 Page: 1 of 20 PAGEID #: 1 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, CIVIL
Case 5:18-cv LHK Document 55 Filed 12/06/18 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-00-lhk Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 Aaron S. Jacobs (CA No. ajacobs@princelobel.com One International Place, Suite 00 Boston, MA 00 --000 Matthew D. Vella (CA No. mvella@princelobel.com 0 Broadway
Case 2:08-cv GW-AGR Document 34 Filed 11/14/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case :0-cv-0-GW-AGR Document Filed //00 Page of 0 0 MICHAEL H. WEISS (State Bar No. 0 mweiss@proskauer.com PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 0 Century Park East, nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 00-0 Telephone: (0-00 Facsimile:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NEWARK DIVISION
Case 2:08-cv-00663-JAG-MCA Document 1 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NEWARK DIVISION ROBERT T. MCGOVERN, : on behalf of himself and all
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO.
0 0 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 0) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 0 California Street, nd Floor San Francisco, California Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -00
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
Case 3:15-cv JAG Document 28 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 57 PageID# 379
Case 3:15-cv-00720-JAG Document 28 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 57 PageID# 379 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNILOC 2017 LLC, Case No. v. Plaintiff, PATENT CASE BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT
Case 1:07-cv MGC Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2008 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-23348-MGC Document 47 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/30/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No.: 07-CIV-23348 COOKE/BANDSTRA TRACFONE
Case 1:17-cv WHP Document 11 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of Civ.
Case 1:17-cv-09027-WHP Document 11 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 12 JUDGE PAULEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GLOBAL COLOCATION SERVICES LLC, Plaintiff, 17 Civ. 17 CV 9027 COMPLAINT
STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. O. Gregoire, Attorney General; and Paula Selis, Senior Counsel, and brings this action against
0 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff, ERNESTO HABERLI, also known as EDUARDO WARREN individually and on behalf of his marital community, Defendant. NO. COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS PANTECH CO., LTD., and PANTECH WIRELESS, INC.,
Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 20 Filed 08/15/17 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 138
Case 2:17-cv-00228-JRG Document 20 Filed 08/15/17 Page 1 of 24 PageID #: 138 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Case: 3:10-cv-00243-slc Document #: 1 Filed: 05/04/2010 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SanDisk Corporation, vs. Plaintiff, Kingston Technology Co.,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNILOC 2017 LLC, Case No. v. Plaintiff, PATENT CASE BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC. AND ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:15-cv-01081 Document 1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Plaintiff v. CIVIL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation, v. Apple Inc., Plaintiffs, Defendant. Civil Action
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. Nature of the Action
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ONE-BLUE, LLC, KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PANASONIC CORPORATION, PIONEER CORPORATION, AND SONY CORPORATION, v. IMATION CORPORATION, Plaintiffs,
Case 3:18-cv G Document 1 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
Case 3:18-cv-00561-G Document 1 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Case :-cv-0-gw-gjs Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: 0 DANIEL J. SCHACHT, # dschacht@donahue.com ANDREW S. MACKAY, #0 amackay@donahue.com JONATHAN MCNEIL WONG, # jmwong@donahue.com DANIEL H. SENTER,
Case3:15-cv EDL Document1 Filed04/07/14 Page1 of 10
Case315-cv-00259-EDL Document1 Filed04/07/14 Page1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ----------------------------------------------------------------x SELENE COMMUNICATION
Case 2:17-cv JRG Document 10 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 142
Case 2:17-cv-00347-JRG Document 10 Filed 06/07/17 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 142 UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., v. Plaintiffs, KIK INTERACTIVE, INC., Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, INC. DEFENDANTS.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
0 0 Alexander C. Giza, SBN agiza@raklaw.com Andrew D. Weiss, SBN aweiss@raklaw.com Jeffrey Z.Y. Liao, SBN jliao@raklaw.com Wilshire Boulevard, th Floor Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
Case 3:09-cv-00619-N Document 5 Filed 06/02/2009 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC., Plaintiff, v. HAIDER KHOJA, et al.,
Case 1:18-cv LY Document 22 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00309-LY Document 22 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION MEETRIX IP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT
TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and ERICSSON INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Plaintiffs, CIVIL CASE NO. vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED WI-LAN USA, INC., WI-LAN INC. and NETWORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING CO., LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES
Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 22 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION
Case 1:18-cv-01731 Document 1 Filed 02/26/18 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIAN FISCHLER, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated,
Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00021 Document 1 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION LEMAIRE ILLUMINATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, vs.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, v. Plaintiff, COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.
Case 1:16-cv LPS Document 1 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:16-cv-00122-LPS Document 1 Filed 03/02/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, v. GROUPON, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTIRCT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
!aaassseee:::- - -cccvvv- - -000000 DDDooocccuuummmeeennnttt FFFiiillleeeddd000///000/// PPPaaagggeee ooofff EDUARDO G. ROY (Bar No. ) DANIEL C. QUINTERO (Bar No. ) JOHN R. HURLEY (Bar No. 0) PROMETHEUS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
Case 1:18-cv-00368-RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION BLUE SKY NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff
Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 23 ECF CASE INTRODUCTION
Case 1:18-cv-01224 Document 1 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIAN FISCHLER, Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated,
Case 1:08-cv JG-VVP Document 1083 Filed 06/27/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:08-cv-00042-JG-VVP Document 1083 Filed 06/27/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 15289 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PRECISION ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves
Case CSS Doc 9 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 17-50478-CSS Doc 9 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: SEARCHMETRICS, INC., 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 17-11032 (CSS) Debtor. Searchmetrics,
: : : : : : : : : : : : : COMPLAINT PARTIES. 1. Plaintiff the State of Rhode Island Department of Revenue ( Department of
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND PROVIDENCE, SC. THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and THE RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, v. Plaintiff, HEWLETT-PACKARD STATE & LOCAL ENTERPRISE SERVICES,
Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 3 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 6
Case 2:16-cv-00753-JRG-RSP Document 3 Filed 07/13/16 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS US LLC AND NOKIA
Case 2:18-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 03/08/18 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00057-RWS Document 1 Filed 03/08/18 Page 1 of 29 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Sonus Networks, Inc., d/b/a/ Ribbon Communications
Case 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 45 PageID #: 1
Case 6:18-cv-00215 Document 1 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 45 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC, Plaintiff, Case
Case 2:15-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 34 PageID #: 1
Case 2:15-cv-00287-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 02/26/15 Page 1 of 34 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ERICSSON INC. and TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
0 0 William C. Bollard, Bar No. 0 william@jbblaw.com JULANDER, BROWN & BOLLARD 0 Irvine Center Drive Irvine, California Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT
Case 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 07/22/16 Page 1 of 86 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Case 6:16-cv-01037 Document 1 Filed 07/22/16 Page 1 of 86 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION REALTIME DATA LLC d/b/a IXO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 6:16-cv-1037
Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 1
Case 6:17-cv-00225 Document 1 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT LLC, Plaintiff,