CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture. Lecture 10 - ILP 3
|
|
|
- Charleen Bradley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 10 - ILP 3 Michela Taufer Powerpoint Lecture Notes from John Hennessy and David Patterson s: Computer Architecture, 4th edition ---- Additional teaching material from: Jelena Mirkovic (U Del) and John Kubiatowicz (UC Berkeley)
2 Another Dynamic Algorithm: Tomasulo Algorithm For IBM 360/91 about 3 years after CDC 6600 (1966) Goal: High Performance without special compilers Differences between IBM 360 & CDC 6600 ISA IBM has only 2 register specifiers/instr vs. 3 in CDC 6600 IBM has 4 FP registers vs. 8 in CDC 6600 IBM has memory-register ops Why Study? lead to Alpha 21264, HP 8000, MIPS 10000, Pentium II, PowerPC 604, 2
3 Tomasulo Algorithm vs. Scoreboard Control & buffers distributed with Function Units (FU) vs. centralized in scoreboard; FU buffers called reservation stations ; have pending operands Registers in instructions replaced by values or pointers to reservation stations(rs); called register renaming ; avoids WAR, WAW hazards More reservation stations than registers, so can do optimizations compilers can t Results to FU from RS, not through registers, over Common Data Bus that broadcasts results to all FUs Load and Stores treated as FUs with RSs as well Integer instructions can go past branches, allowing FP ops beyond basic block in FP queue 3
4 Tomasulo Organization From Mem FP Op Queue Load Buffers Load1 Load2 Load3 Load4 Load5 Load6 FP Registers Store Buffers Add1 Add2 Add3 Mult1 Mult2 FP adders Reservation Stations FP multipliers To Mem Common Data Bus (CDB) 4
5 Reservation Station Components Op: Operation to perform in the unit (e.g., + or ) Vj, Vk: Value of Source operands Store buffers has V field, result to be stored Qj, Qk: Reservation stations producing source registers (value to be written) Note: No ready flags as in Scoreboard; Qj,Qk=0 => ready Store buffers only have Qi for RS producing result Busy: Indicates reservation station or FU is busy Register result status Indicates which functional unit will write each register, if one exists. Blank when no pending instructions that will write that register. 5
6 Three Stages of Tomasulo Algorithm 1. Issue get instruction from FP Op Queue If reservation station free (no structural hazard), control issues instr & sends operands (renames registers). 2. Execution operate on operands (EX) When both operands ready then execute; if not ready, watch Common Data Bus for result 3. Write result finish execution (WB) Write on Common Data Bus to all awaiting units; mark reservation station available Normal data bus: data + destination ( go to bus) Common data bus: data + source ( come from bus) 64 bits of data + 4 bits of Functional Unit source address Write if matches expected Functional Unit (produces result) Does the broadcast 6
7 Tomasulo Example Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R2 Load1 No LD F2 45+ R3 Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F2 DIVD F10 F0 F6 ADDD F6 F8 F2 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No Mult1 No Mult2 No Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 0 FU 7
8 Tomasulo Example Cycle 1 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R2 1 Load1 Yes 34+R2 LD F2 45+ R3 Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F2 DIVD F10 F0 F6 ADDD F6 F8 F2 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No Mult1 No Mult2 No Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 1 FU Load1 8
9 Tomasulo Example Cycle 2 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R2 1 Load1 Yes 34+R2 LD F2 45+ R3 2 Load2 Yes 45+R3 MULTD F0 F2 F4 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F2 DIVD F10 F0 F6 ADDD F6 F8 F2 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No Mult1 No Mult2 No Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 2 FU Load2 Load1 Note: Unlike 6600, can have multiple loads outstanding 9
10 Tomasulo Example Cycle 3 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R2 1 3 Load1 Yes 34+R2 LD F2 45+ R3 2 Load2 Yes 45+R3 MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F2 DIVD F10 F0 F6 ADDD F6 F8 F2 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No Mult1 Yes MULTD R(F4) Load2 Mult2 No Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 3 FU Mult1 Load2 Load1 Note: registers names are removed ( renamed ) in Reservation Stations; MULT issued vs. scoreboard Load1 completing; what is waiting for Load1? 10
11 Tomasulo Example Cycle 4 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R3 2 4 Load2 Yes 45+R3 MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F2 4 DIVD F10 F0 F6 ADDD F6 F8 F2 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 Yes SUBD M(A1) Load2 Add2 No Add3 No Mult1 Yes MULTD R(F4) Load2 Mult2 No Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 4 FU Mult1 Load2 M(A1) Add1 Load2 completing; what is waiting for Load1? 11
12 Tomasulo Example Cycle 5 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F2 4 DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F2 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk 2 Add1 Yes SUBD M(A1) M(A2) Add2 No Add3 No 10 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 5 FU Mult1 M(A2) M(A1) Add1 Mult2 12
13 Tomasulo Example Cycle 6 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F2 4 DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F2 6 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk 1 Add1 Yes SUBD M(A1) M(A2) Add2 Yes ADDD M(A2) Add1 Add3 No 9 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 6 FU Mult1 M(A2) Add2 Add1 Mult2 Issue ADDD here vs. scoreboard? 13
14 Tomasulo Example Cycle 7 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F2 4 7 DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F2 6 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk 0 Add1 Yes SUBD M(A1) M(A2) Add2 Yes ADDD M(A2) Add1 Add3 No 8 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 7 FU Mult1 M(A2) Add2 Add1 Mult2 Add1 completing; what is waiting for it? 14
15 Tomasulo Example Cycle 8 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F2 6 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No 2 Add2 Yes ADDD (M-M) M(A2) Add3 No 7 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 8 FU Mult1 M(A2) Add2 (M-M) Mult2 15
16 Tomasulo Example Cycle 9 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F2 6 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No 1 Add2 Yes ADDD (M-M) M(A2) Add3 No 6 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 9 FU Mult1 M(A2) Add2 (M-M) Mult2 16
17 Tomasulo Example Cycle 10 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No 0 Add2 Yes ADDD (M-M) M(A2) Add3 No 5 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 10 FU Mult1 M(A2) Add2 (M-M) Mult2 Add2 completing; what is waiting for it? 17
18 Tomasulo Example Cycle 11 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No 4 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 11 FU Mult1 M(A2) (M-M+M(M-M) Mult2 Write result of ADDD here vs. scoreboard? All quick instructions complete in this cycle! 18
19 Tomasulo Example Cycle 12 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No 3 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 12 FU Mult1 M(A2) (M-M+M(M-M) Mult2 19
20 Tomasulo Example Cycle 13 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No 2 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 13 FU Mult1 M(A2) (M-M+M(M-M) Mult2 20
21 Tomasulo Example Cycle 14 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F4 3 Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No 1 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 14 FU Mult1 M(A2) (M-M+M(M-M) Mult2 21
22 Tomasulo Example Cycle 15 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No 0 Mult1 Yes MULTD M(A2) R(F4) Mult2 Yes DIVD M(A1) Mult1 Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 15 FU Mult1 M(A2) (M-M+M(M-M) Mult2 22
23 Tomasulo Example Cycle 16 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No Mult1 No 40 Mult2 Yes DIVD M*F4 M(A1) Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 16 FU M*F4 M(A2) (M-M+M(M-M) Mult2 23
24 Faster than light computation (skip a couple of cycles) 24
25 Tomasulo Example Cycle 55 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F6 5 ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No Mult1 No 1 Mult2 Yes DIVD M*F4 M(A1) Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 55 FU M*F4 M(A2) (M-M+M(M-M) Mult2 25
26 Tomasulo Example Cycle 56 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No Mult1 No 0 Mult2 Yes DIVD M*F4 M(A1) Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 56 FU M*F4 M(A2) (M-M+M(M-M) Mult2 Mult2 is completing; what is waiting for it? 26
27 Tomasulo Example Cycle 57 Instruction status: Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Comp Result Busy Address LD F6 34+ R Load1 No LD F2 45+ R Load2 No MULTD F0 F2 F Load3 No SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F ADDD F6 F8 F Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Add1 No Add2 No Add3 No Mult1 No Mult2 Yes DIVD M*F4 M(A1) Register result status: Clock F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F30 56 FU M*F4 M(A2) (M-M+M(M-M) Result Once again: In-order issue, out-of-order execution and completion. 27
28 Compare to Scoreboard Cycle 62 Instruction status: Read Exec Write Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Oper Comp Result Issue ComplResult LD F6 34+ R LD F2 45+ R MULTD F0 F2 F SUBD F8 F6 F DIVD F10 F0 F ADDD F6 F8 F Why take longer on scoreboard/6600? Structural Hazards Lack of forwarding 28
29 Tomasulo Drawbacks Complexity delays of 360/91, MIPS 10000, IBM 620? Many associative stores (CDB) at high speed Performance limited by Common Data Bus Multiple CDBs => more FU logic for parallel assoc stores 29
30 Review: Scoreboard Architecture (CDC 6600) Registers FP Mult FP Mult FP Divide FP Add Integer Functional Units SCOREBOARD Memory 30
31 Review: Four Stages of Scoreboard Control Issue decode instructions & check for structural hazards (ID1) Instructions issued in program order (for hazard checking) Don t issue if structural hazard Don t issue if instruction is output dependent on any previously issued but uncompleted instruction (no WAW hazards) Read operands wait until no data hazards, then read ops (ID2) All real dependencies (RAW hazards) resolved in this stage, since we wait for instructions to write back data. No forwarding of data in this model! Execution operate on operands (EX) The functional unit begins execution upon receiving operands. When the result is ready, it notifies the scoreboard that it has completed execution. Write result finish execution (WB) Stall until no WAR hazards with previous instructions: 31
32 Review: Tomasulo Organization From Mem FP Op Queue Load Buffers Load1 Load2 Load3 Load4 Load5 Load6 FP Registers Store Buffers Add1 Add2 Add3 Mult1 Mult2 FP adders Reservation Stations FP multipliers To Mem Common Data Bus (CDB) 32
33 Review: Three Stages of Tomasulo Algorithm 1. Issue get instruction from FP Op Queue If reservation station free (no structural hazard), control issues instr & sends operands (renames registers). 2. Execution operate on operands (EX) When both operands ready then execute; if not ready, watch Common Data Bus for result 3. Write result finish execution (WB) Write on Common Data Bus to all awaiting units; mark reservation station available Normal data bus: data + destination ( go to bus) Common data bus: data + source ( come from bus) 64 bits of data + 4 bits of Functional Unit source address Write if matches expected Functional Unit (produces result) Does the broadcast 33
34 Tomasulo v. Scoreboard (IBM 360/91 v. CDC 6600) Pipelined Functional Units Multiple Functional Units (6 load, 3 store, 3 +, 2 x/ ) (1 load/store, 1 +, 2 x, 1 ) window size: 14 instructions 5 instructions No issue on structural hazard same WAR: renaming avoids stall completion WAW: renaming avoids stall issue Broadcast results from FU Write/read registers Control: reservation stations central scoreboard 34
35 Loops 35
36 Tomasulo Loop Example Loop: LD F0 0 R1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 SD F4 0 R1 SUBI R1 R1 #8 BNEZ R1 Loop Assume Multiply takes 4 clocks Assume first load takes 8 clocks (cache miss), second load takes 1 clock (hit) To be clear, will show clocks for SUBI, BNEZ Reality: integer instructions ahead 36
37 Loop Example Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 Store1 No 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 Store2 No 2 SD F4 0 R1 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 No SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu 37
38 Loop Example Cycle 1 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 1 Load1 Yes 80 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 Store1 No 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 Store2 No 2 SD F4 0 R1 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 No SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load1 38
39 Loop Example Cycle 2 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 1 Load1 Yes 80 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 Store1 No 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 Store2 No 2 SD F4 0 R1 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F4) Load1 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load1 Mult1 39
40 Loop Example Cycle 3 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 1 Load1 Yes 80 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 Store2 No 2 SD F4 0 R1 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F4) Load1 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load1 Mult1 Implicit renaming sets up DataFlow graph 40
41 Loop Example Cycle 4 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 1 Load1 Yes 80 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 Store2 No 2 SD F4 0 R1 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F4) Load1 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load1 Mult1 Dispatching SUBI Instruction 41
42 Loop Example Cycle 5 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 1 Load1 Yes 80 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 Store2 No 2 SD F4 0 R1 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F4) Load1 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load1 Mult1 And, BNEZ instruction 42
43 Loop Example Cycle 6 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 1 Load1 Yes 80 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 Yes 72 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 6 Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 Store2 No 2 SD F4 0 R1 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F4) Load1 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load2 Mult1 Notice that F0 never sees Load from location 80 43
44 Loop Example Cycle 7 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 1 Load1 Yes 80 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 Yes 72 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 6 Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 7 Store2 No 2 SD F4 0 R1 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F2) Load1 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 Yes Multd R(F2) Load2 BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load2 Mult2 Register file completely detached from computation First and Second iteration completely overlapped 44
45 Loop Example Cycle 8 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 1 Load1 Yes 80 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 Yes 72 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 6 Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 7 Store2 Yes 72 Mult2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F2) Load1 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 Yes Multd R(F2) Load2 BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load2 Mult2 45
46 Loop Example Cycle 9 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R1 1 9 Load1 Yes 80 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 Yes 72 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R1 6 Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 7 Store2 Yes 72 Mult2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F2) Load1 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 Yes Multd R(F2) Load2 BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load2 Mult2 Load1 completing: who is waiting? Note: Dispatching SUBI 46
47 Loop Example Cycle 10 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 Yes 72 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 No 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 7 Store2 Yes 72 Mult2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 4 Mult1 Yes Multd M[80] R(F2) SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 Yes Multd R(F2) Load2 BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load2 Mult2 Load2 completing: who is waiting? Note: Dispatching BNEZ 47
48 Loop Example Cycle 11 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 7 Store2 Yes 72 Mult2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 3 Mult1 Yes Multd M[80] R(F2) SUBI R1 R1 #8 4 Mult2 Yes Multd M[72] R(F2) BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult2 Next load in sequence 48
49 Loop Example Cycle 12 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 7 Store2 Yes 72 Mult2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 2 Mult1 Yes Multd M[80] R(F2) SUBI R1 R1 #8 3 Mult2 Yes Multd M[72] R(F2) BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult2 Why not issue third multiply? 49
50 Loop Example Cycle 13 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F2 2 Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 7 Store2 Yes 72 Mult2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 1 Mult1 Yes Multd M[80] R(F2) SUBI R1 R1 #8 2 Mult2 Yes Multd M[72] R(F2) BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult2 50
51 Loop Example Cycle 14 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 Yes 80 Mult1 2 MULTD F4 F0 F2 7 Store2 Yes 72 Mult2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 0 Mult1 Yes Multd M[80] R(F2) SUBI R1 R1 #8 1 Mult2 Yes Multd M[72] R(F2) BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult2 Mult1 completing. Who is waiting? 51
52 Loop Example Cycle 15 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 Yes 80 [80]*R2 2 MULTD F4 F0 F Store2 Yes 72 Mult2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 No SUBI R1 R1 #8 0 Mult2 Yes Multd M[72] R(F2) BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult2 Mult2 completing. Who is waiting? 52
53 Loop Example Cycle 16 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 Yes 80 [80]*R2 2 MULTD F4 F0 F Store2 Yes 72 [72]*R2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 No Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F2) Load3 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult1 53
54 Loop Example Cycle 17 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R1 3 Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 Yes 80 [80]*R2 2 MULTD F4 F0 F Store2 Yes 72 [72]*R2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 Yes 64 Mult1 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F2) Load3 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult1 54
55 Loop Example Cycle 18 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 Yes 80 [80]*R2 2 MULTD F4 F0 F Store2 Yes 72 [72]*R2 2 SD F4 0 R1 8 Store3 Yes 64 Mult1 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F2) Load3 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult1 55
56 Loop Example Cycle 19 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 No 2 MULTD F4 F0 F Store2 Yes 72 [72]*R2 2 SD F4 0 R Store3 Yes 64 Mult1 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F2) Load3 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult1 56
57 Loop Example Cycle 20 Instruction status: Exec Write ITER Instruction j k Issue CompResult Busy Addr Fu 1 LD F0 0 R Load1 No 1 MULTD F4 F0 F Load2 No 1 SD F4 0 R Load3 Yes 64 2 LD F0 0 R Store1 No 2 MULTD F4 F0 F Store2 No 2 SD F4 0 R Store3 Yes 64 Mult1 Reservation Stations: S1 S2 RS Time Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk Code: Add1 No LD F0 0 R1 Add2 No MULTD F4 F0 F2 Add3 No SD F4 0 R1 Mult1 Yes Multd R(F2) Load3 SUBI R1 R1 #8 Mult2 No BNEZ R1 Loop Register result status Clock R1 F0 F2 F4 F6 F8 F10 F12... F Fu Load3 Mult1 57
58 Why can Tomasulo overlap iterations of loops? Register renaming Multiple iterations use different physical destinations for registers (dynamic loop unrolling). Reservation stations Permit instruction issue to advance past integer control flow operations Other idea: Tomasulo building dynamic DataFlow graph from instructions. 58
59 Tomasulo Summary Prevents Register as bottleneck Avoids WAR, WAW hazards of Scoreboard Allows loop unrolling in HW Not limited to basic blocks (provided branch prediction) Lasting Contributions Dynamic scheduling Register renaming Load/store disambiguation 59
60 Deadlines 5 Sep 30 Homework review 5 Oct 2 Lec08 - Instruction Level Parallelism (ILP) Q3 6 Oct 7 Lec09 - Dynamic Scheduling: Scoreboard 6 Oct 9 Lec10 - Dynamic Scheduling: Tomasulo 7 Oct 14 Lec11 - Hardware Speculation 7 Oct 16 Lec12 - Multiple Issue Oct 20 Homework 2 due 8 Oct 21 Homework review 8 Oct 23 Midterm exam Chap 3; App C 9 Oct 28 Lec13 - Study of the Limitations of ILP 9 Oct 30 Lec14 - Review Cache and Review Virtual Memory Q4 60
CS252 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 6. Recall: Software Pipelining Example
CS252 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 6 Tomasulo, Implicit Register Renaming, Loop-Level Parallelism Extraction Explicit Register Renaming John Kubiatowicz Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
Review: Compiler techniques for parallelism Loop unrolling Ÿ Multiple iterations of loop in software:
CS152 Computer Architecture and Engineering Lecture 17 Dynamic Scheduling: Tomasulo March 20, 2001 John Kubiatowicz (http.cs.berkeley.edu/~kubitron) lecture slides: http://www-inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs152/
Recall from Pipelining Review. Lecture 16: Instruction Level Parallelism and Dynamic Execution #1: Ideas to Reduce Stalls
CS252 Graduate Computer Architecture Recall from Pipelining Review Lecture 16: Instruction Level Parallelism and Dynamic Execution #1: March 16, 2001 Prof. David A. Patterson Computer Science 252 Spring
CPE 631 Lecture 10: Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation
Lecture 10: Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation Aleksandar Milenković, milenka@ece.uah.edu Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama in Huntsville Outline Tomasulo
吳俊興高雄大學資訊工程學系. October Example to eleminate WAR and WAW by register renaming. Tomasulo Algorithm. A Dynamic Algorithm: Tomasulo s Algorithm
EEF011 Computer Architecture 計算機結構 吳俊興高雄大學資訊工程學系 October 2004 Example to eleminate WAR and WAW by register renaming Original DIV.D ADD.D S.D SUB.D MUL.D F0, F2, F4 F6, F0, F8 F6, 0(R1) F8, F10, F14 F6,
CPE 631 Lecture 11: Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation
Lecture 11: Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation Aleksandar Milenkovic, milenka@ece.uah.edu Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama in Huntsville Outline Instruction
Page 1. Recall from Pipelining Review. Lecture 16: Instruction Level Parallelism and Dynamic Execution #1: Ideas to Reduce Stalls
CS252 Graduate Computer Architecture Recall from Pipelining Review Lecture 16: Instruction Level Parallelism and Dynamic Execution #1: March 16, 2001 Prof. David A. Patterson Computer Science 252 Spring
Processor: Superscalars Dynamic Scheduling
Processor: Superscalars Dynamic Scheduling Z. Jerry Shi Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering University of Connecticut * Slides adapted from Blumrich&Gschwind/ELE475 03, Peh/ELE475 (Princeton),
CPE 631 Lecture 10: Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation
Lecture 10: Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation Aleksandar Milenkovic, milenka@ece.uah.edu Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama in Huntsville Outline Instruction
Metodologie di Progettazione Hardware-Software
Metodologie di Progettazione Hardware-Software Advanced Pipelining and Instruction-Level Paralelism Metodologie di Progettazione Hardware/Software LS Ing. Informatica 1 ILP Instruction-level Parallelism
Page 1. Recall from Pipelining Review. Lecture 15: Instruction Level Parallelism and Dynamic Execution
CS252 Graduate Computer Architecture Recall from Pipelining Review Lecture 15: Instruction Level Parallelism and Dynamic Execution March 11, 2002 Prof. David E. Culler Computer Science 252 Spring 2002
COSC4201 Instruction Level Parallelism Dynamic Scheduling
COSC4201 Instruction Level Parallelism Dynamic Scheduling Prof. Mokhtar Aboelaze Parts of these slides are taken from Notes by Prof. David Patterson (UCB) Outline Data dependence and hazards Exposing parallelism
Superscalar Architectures: Part 2
Superscalar Architectures: Part 2 Dynamic (Out-of-Order) Scheduling Lecture 3.2 August 23 rd, 2017 Jae W. Lee (jaewlee@snu.ac.kr) Computer Science and Engineering Seoul NaMonal University Download this
Reduction of Data Hazards Stalls with Dynamic Scheduling So far we have dealt with data hazards in instruction pipelines by:
Reduction of Data Hazards Stalls with Dynamic Scheduling So far we have dealt with data hazards in instruction pipelines by: Result forwarding (register bypassing) to reduce or eliminate stalls needed
ELEC 5200/6200 Computer Architecture and Design Fall 2016 Lecture 9: Instruction Level Parallelism
ELEC 5200/6200 Computer Architecture and Design Fall 2016 Lecture 9: Instruction Level Parallelism Ujjwal Guin, Assistant Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Auburn University,
Dynamic Scheduling. Better than static scheduling Scoreboarding: Tomasulo algorithm:
LECTURE - 13 Dynamic Scheduling Better than static scheduling Scoreboarding: Used by the CDC 6600 Useful only within basic block WAW and WAR stalls Tomasulo algorithm: Used in IBM 360/91 for the FP unit
Chapter 3 Instruction-Level Parallelism and its Exploitation (Part 1)
Chapter 3 Instruction-Level Parallelism and its Exploitation (Part 1) ILP vs. Parallel Computers Dynamic Scheduling (Section 3.4, 3.5) Dynamic Branch Prediction (Section 3.3) Hardware Speculation and Precise
Graduate Computer Architecture. Chapter 3. Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation
Graduate Computer Architecture Chapter 3 Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation 1 Overview Instruction level parallelism Dynamic Scheduling Techniques Scoreboarding (Appendix A.8) Tomasulo
ILP concepts (2.1) Basic compiler techniques (2.2) Reducing branch costs with prediction (2.3) Dynamic scheduling (2.4 and 2.5)
Instruction-Level Parallelism and its Exploitation: PART 1 ILP concepts (2.1) Basic compiler techniques (2.2) Reducing branch costs with prediction (2.3) Dynamic scheduling (2.4 and 2.5) Project and Case
Adapted from David Patterson s slides on graduate computer architecture
Mei Yang Adapted from David Patterson s slides on graduate computer architecture Introduction Basic Compiler Techniques for Exposing ILP Advanced Branch Prediction Dynamic Scheduling Hardware-Based Speculation
Static vs. Dynamic Scheduling
Static vs. Dynamic Scheduling Dynamic Scheduling Fast Requires complex hardware More power consumption May result in a slower clock Static Scheduling Done in S/W (compiler) Maybe not as fast Simpler processor
Scoreboard information (3 tables) Four stages of scoreboard control
Scoreboard information (3 tables) Instruction : issued, read operands and started execution (dispatched), completed execution or wrote result, Functional unit (assuming non-pipelined units) busy/not busy
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 13 - CPI < 1
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 13 - CPI < 1 Michela Taufer http://www.cis.udel.edu/~taufer/teaching/cis662f07 Powerpoint Lecture Notes from John Hennessy and David Patterson s: Computer
Instruction-Level Parallelism and Its Exploitation
Chapter 2 Instruction-Level Parallelism and Its Exploitation 1 Overview Instruction level parallelism Dynamic Scheduling Techniques es Scoreboarding Tomasulo s s Algorithm Reducing Branch Cost with Dynamic
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 11 - Hardware Speculation Branch Predictions
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 11 - Hardware Speculation Branch Predictions Michela Taufer http://www.cis.udel.edu/~taufer/teaching/cis6627 Powerpoint Lecture Notes from John Hennessy
Hardware-based speculation (2.6) Multiple-issue plus static scheduling = VLIW (2.7) Multiple-issue, dynamic scheduling, and speculation (2.
Instruction-Level Parallelism and its Exploitation: PART 2 Hardware-based speculation (2.6) Multiple-issue plus static scheduling = VLIW (2.7) Multiple-issue, dynamic scheduling, and speculation (2.8)
CS252 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 8. Review: Scoreboard (CDC 6600) Explicit Renaming Precise Interrupts February 13 th, 2010
CS252 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 8 Explicit Renaming Precise Interrupts February 13 th, 2010 John Kubiatowicz Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley
EECC551 Exam Review 4 questions out of 6 questions
EECC551 Exam Review 4 questions out of 6 questions (Must answer first 2 questions and 2 from remaining 4) Instruction Dependencies and graphs In-order Floating Point/Multicycle Pipelining (quiz 2) Improving
EITF20: Computer Architecture Part3.2.1: Pipeline - 3
EITF20: Computer Architecture Part3.2.1: Pipeline - 3 Liang Liu liang.liu@eit.lth.se 1 Outline Reiteration Dynamic scheduling - Tomasulo Superscalar, VLIW Speculation ILP limitations What we have done
Instruction Level Parallelism. Taken from
Instruction Level Parallelism Taken from http://www.cs.utsa.edu/~dj/cs3853/lecture5.ppt Outline ILP Compiler techniques to increase ILP Loop Unrolling Static Branch Prediction Dynamic Branch Prediction
Instruction Level Parallelism
Instruction Level Parallelism Dynamic scheduling Scoreboard Technique Tomasulo Algorithm Speculation Reorder Buffer Superscalar Processors 1 Definition of ILP ILP=Potential overlap of execution among unrelated
Page # CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture. Lecture 8 - ILP 1. Pipeline CPI. Pipeline CPI (I) Michela Taufer
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 8 - ILP 1 Michela Taufer http://www.cis.udel.edu/~taufer/teaching/cis662f07 Powerpoint Lecture Notes from John Hennessy and David Patterson s: Computer Architecture,
Lecture-13 (ROB and Multi-threading) CS422-Spring
Lecture-13 (ROB and Multi-threading) CS422-Spring 2018 Biswa@CSE-IITK Cycle 62 (Scoreboard) vs 57 in Tomasulo Instruction status: Read Exec Write Exec Write Instruction j k Issue Oper Comp Result Issue
Topics. Digital Systems Architecture EECE EECE Predication, Prediction, and Speculation
Digital Systems Architecture EECE 343-01 EECE 292-02 Predication, Prediction, and Speculation Dr. William H. Robinson February 25, 2004 http://eecs.vanderbilt.edu/courses/eece343/ Topics Aha, now I see,
332 Advanced Computer Architecture Chapter 3. Dynamic scheduling, out-of-order execution, register renaming and speculative execution
332 Advanced Computer Architecture Chapter 3 Dynamic scheduling, out-of-order execution, register renaming and speculative execution February 2017 Paul H J Kelly These lecture notes are partly based on
Website for Students VTU NOTES QUESTION PAPERS NEWS RESULTS
Advanced Computer Architecture- 06CS81 Hardware Based Speculation Tomasulu algorithm and Reorder Buffer Tomasulu idea: 1. Have reservation stations where register renaming is possible 2. Results are directly
Chapter 4 The Processor 1. Chapter 4D. The Processor
Chapter 4 The Processor 1 Chapter 4D The Processor Chapter 4 The Processor 2 Instruction-Level Parallelism (ILP) Pipelining: executing multiple instructions in parallel To increase ILP Deeper pipeline
Advanced Computer Architecture CMSC 611 Homework 3. Due in class Oct 17 th, 2012
Advanced Computer Architecture CMSC 611 Homework 3 Due in class Oct 17 th, 2012 (Show your work to receive partial credit) 1) For the following code snippet list the data dependencies and rewrite the code
Multicycle ALU Operations 2/28/2011. Diversified Pipelines The Path Toward Superscalar Processors. Limitations of Our Simple 5 stage Pipeline
//11 Limitations of Our Simple stage Pipeline Diversified Pipelines The Path Toward Superscalar Processors HPCA, Spring 11 Assumes single cycle EX stage for all instructions This is not feasible for Complex
Instruction Level Parallelism (ILP)
Instruction Level Parallelism (ILP) Pipelining supports a limited sense of ILP e.g. overlapped instructions, out of order completion and issue, bypass logic, etc. Remember Pipeline CPI = Ideal Pipeline
Load1 no Load2 no Add1 Y Sub Reg[F2] Reg[F6] Add2 Y Add Reg[F2] Add1 Add3 no Mult1 Y Mul Reg[F2] Reg[F4] Mult2 Y Div Reg[F6] Mult1
![Load1 no Load2 no Add1 Y Sub Reg[F2] Reg[F6] Add2 Y Add Reg[F2] Add1 Add3 no Mult1 Y Mul Reg[F2] Reg[F4] Mult2 Y Div Reg[F6] Mult1](/thumbs/92/108067849.jpg "Load1 no Load2 no Add1 Y Sub Reg[F2] Reg[F6] Add2 Y Add Reg[F2] Add1 Add3 no Mult1 Y Mul Reg[F2] Reg[F4] Mult2 Y Div Reg[F6] Mult1")
Instruction Issue Execute Write result L.D F6, 34(R2) L.D F2, 45(R3) MUL.D F0, F2, F4 SUB.D F8, F2, F6 DIV.D F10, F0, F6 ADD.D F6, F8, F2 Name Busy Op Vj Vk Qj Qk A Load1 no Load2 no Add1 Y Sub Reg[F2]
Functional Units. Registers. The Big Picture: Where are We Now? The Five Classic Components of a Computer Processor Input Control Memory
The Big Picture: Where are We Now? CS152 Computer Architecture and Engineering Lecture 18 The Five Classic Components of a Computer Processor Input Control Dynamic Scheduling (Cont), Speculation, and ILP
What is ILP? Instruction Level Parallelism. Where do we find ILP? How do we expose ILP?
What is ILP? Instruction Level Parallelism or Declaration of Independence The characteristic of a program that certain instructions are, and can potentially be. Any mechanism that creates, identifies,
CSE 502 Graduate Computer Architecture. Lec 8-10 Instruction Level Parallelism
CSE 502 Graduate Computer Architecture Lec 8-10 Instruction Level Parallelism Larry Wittie Computer Science, StonyBrook University http://www.cs.sunysb.edu/~cse502 and ~lw Slides adapted from David Patterson,
ESE 545 Computer Architecture Instruction-Level Parallelism (ILP) and Static & Dynamic Instruction Scheduling Instruction level parallelism
Computer Architecture ESE 545 Computer Architecture Instruction-Level Parallelism (ILP) and Static & Dynamic Instruction Scheduling 1 Outline ILP Compiler techniques to increase ILP Loop Unrolling Static
NOW Handout Page 1. Review from Last Time. CSE 820 Graduate Computer Architecture. Lec 7 Instruction Level Parallelism. Recall from Pipelining Review
Review from Last Time CSE 820 Graduate Computer Architecture Lec 7 Instruction Level Parallelism Based on slides by David Patterson 4 papers: All about where to draw line between HW and SW IBM set foundations
NOW Handout Page 1. Outline. Csci 211 Computer System Architecture. Lec 4 Instruction Level Parallelism. Instruction Level Parallelism
Outline Csci 211 Computer System Architecture Lec 4 Instruction Level Parallelism Xiuzhen Cheng Department of Computer Sciences The George Washington University ILP Compiler techniques to increase ILP
Instruction Frequency CPI. Load-store 55% 5. Arithmetic 30% 4. Branch 15% 4
PROBLEM 1: An application running on a 1GHz pipelined processor has the following instruction mix: Instruction Frequency CPI Load-store 55% 5 Arithmetic 30% 4 Branch 15% 4 a) Determine the overall CPI
DYNAMIC INSTRUCTION SCHEDULING WITH SCOREBOARD
DYNAMIC INSTRUCTION SCHEDULING WITH SCOREBOARD Slides by: Pedro Tomás Additional reading: Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach, 5th edition, Chapter 3, John L. Hennessy and David A. Patterson,
Handout 2 ILP: Part B
Handout 2 ILP: Part B Review from Last Time #1 Leverage Implicit Parallelism for Performance: Instruction Level Parallelism Loop unrolling by compiler to increase ILP Branch prediction to increase ILP
Four Steps of Speculative Tomasulo cycle 0
HW support for More ILP Hardware Speculative Execution Speculation: allow an instruction to issue that is dependent on branch, without any consequences (including exceptions) if branch is predicted incorrectly
CPE 631 Lecture 09: Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation
Lecture 09: Instruction Level Parallelism and Its Dynamic Exploitation Aleksandar Milenkovic, milenka@ece.uah.edu Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama in Huntsville Outline Instruction
CSE 820 Graduate Computer Architecture. week 6 Instruction Level Parallelism. Review from Last Time #1
CSE 820 Graduate Computer Architecture week 6 Instruction Level Parallelism Based on slides by David Patterson Review from Last Time #1 Leverage Implicit Parallelism for Performance: Instruction Level
The basic structure of a MIPS floating-point unit
Tomasulo s scheme The algorithm based on the idea of reservation station The reservation station fetches and buffers an operand as soon as it is available, eliminating the need to get the operand from
Hardware-based Speculation
Hardware-based Speculation M. Sonza Reorda Politecnico di Torino Dipartimento di Automatica e Informatica 1 Introduction Hardware-based speculation is a technique for reducing the effects of control dependences
ECE 552 / CPS 550 Advanced Computer Architecture I. Lecture 9 Instruction-Level Parallelism Part 2
ECE 552 / CPS 550 Advanced Computer Architecture I Lecture 9 Instruction-Level Parallelism Part 2 Benjamin Lee Electrical and Computer Engineering Duke University www.duke.edu/~bcl15 www.duke.edu/~bcl15/class/class_ece252fall12.html
Page 1. CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture. Lecture 8 - ILP 1. Pipeline CPI. Pipeline CPI (I) Pipeline CPI (II) Michela Taufer
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 8 - ILP 1 Michela Taufer Pipeline CPI http://www.cis.udel.edu/~taufer/teaching/cis662f07 Powerpoint Lecture Notes from John Hennessy and David Patterson
Chapter 3: Instruction Level Parallelism (ILP) and its exploitation. Types of dependences
Chapter 3: Instruction Level Parallelism (ILP) and its exploitation Pipeline CPI = Ideal pipeline CPI + stalls due to hazards invisible to programmer (unlike process level parallelism) ILP: overlap execution
Detailed Scoreboard Pipeline Control. Three Parts of the Scoreboard. Scoreboard Example Cycle 1. Scoreboard Example. Scoreboard Example Cycle 3
1 From MIPS pipeline to Scoreboard Lecture 5 Scoreboarding: Enforce Register Data Dependence Scoreboard design, big example Out-of-order execution divides ID stage: 1.Issue decode instructions, check for
Advantages of Dynamic Scheduling
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Computer Architecture ECE 568 Part 5 Dynamic scheduling with Scoreboards Israel Koren ECE568/Koren Part.5.1 Advantages of Dynamic
Instruction Level Parallelism
Instruction Level Parallelism The potential overlap among instruction execution is called Instruction Level Parallelism (ILP) since instructions can be executed in parallel. There are mainly two approaches
Tomasulo s Algorithm
Tomasulo s Algorithm Architecture to increase ILP Removes WAR and WAW dependencies during issue WAR and WAW Name Dependencies Artifact of using the same storage location (variable name) Can be avoided
Lecture 4: Introduction to Advanced Pipelining
Lecture 4: Introduction to Advanced Pipelining Prepared by: Professor David A. Patterson Computer Science 252, Fall 1996 Edited and presented by : Prof. Kurt Keutzer Computer Science 252, Spring 2000 KK
Review: Evaluating Branch Alternatives. Lecture 3: Introduction to Advanced Pipelining. Review: Evaluating Branch Prediction
Review: Evaluating Branch Alternatives Lecture 3: Introduction to Advanced Pipelining Two part solution: Determine branch taken or not sooner, AND Compute taken branch address earlier Pipeline speedup
Computer Architectures. Chapter 4. Tien-Fu Chen. National Chung Cheng Univ.
Computer Architectures Chapter 4 Tien-Fu Chen National Chung Cheng Univ. chap4-0 Advance Pipelining! Static Scheduling Have compiler to minimize the effect of structural, data, and control dependence "
High Performance Computer Architecture Prof. Ajit Pal Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
High Performance Computer Architecture Prof. Ajit Pal Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur Lecture - 18 Dynamic Instruction Scheduling with Branch Prediction
EI 338: Computer Systems Engineering (Operating Systems & Computer Architecture)
EI 338: Computer Systems Engineering (Operating Systems & Computer Architecture) Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering Chentao Wu wuct@cs.sjtu.edu.cn Download lectures ftp://public.sjtu.edu.cn User:
Advanced Computer Architecture
Advanced Computer Architecture Instruction Level Parallelism Myung Hoon, Sunwoo School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ajou University Outline ILP Compiler techniques to increase ILP Loop Unrolling
Recall from Pipelining Review. Instruction Level Parallelism and Dynamic Execution
332 Advanced Computer Architecture Chapter 4 Instruction Level Parallelism and Dynamic Execution January 2004 Paul H J Kelly These lecture notes are partly based on the course text, Hennessy and Patterson
EECC551 Review. Dynamic Hardware-Based Speculation
EECC551 Review Recent Trends in Computer Design. Computer Performance Measures. Instruction Pipelining. Branch Prediction. Instruction-Level Parallelism (ILP). Loop-Level Parallelism (LLP). Dynamic Pipeline
EEC 581 Computer Architecture. Lec 7 Instruction Level Parallelism (2.6 Hardware-based Speculation and 2.7 Static Scheduling/VLIW)
EEC 581 Computer Architecture Lec 7 Instruction Level Parallelism (2.6 Hardware-based Speculation and 2.7 Static Scheduling/VLIW) Chansu Yu Electrical and Computer Engineering Cleveland State University
ELE 818 * ADVANCED COMPUTER ARCHITECTURES * MIDTERM TEST *
ELE 818 * ADVANCED COMPUTER ARCHITECTURES * MIDTERM TEST * SAMPLE 1 Section: Simple pipeline for integer operations For all following questions we assume that: a) Pipeline contains 5 stages: IF, ID, EX,
CS 423 Computer Architecture Spring Lecture 04: A Superscalar Pipeline
CS 423 Computer Architecture Spring 2012 Lecture 04: A Superscalar Pipeline Ozcan Ozturk http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~ozturk/cs423/ [Adapted from Computer Organization and Design, Patterson & Hennessy,
5008: Computer Architecture
5008: Computer Architecture Chapter 2 Instruction-Level Parallelism and Its Exploitation CA Lecture05 - ILP (cwliu@twins.ee.nctu.edu.tw) 05-1 Review from Last Lecture Instruction Level Parallelism Leverage
Pipelining: Issue instructions in every cycle (CPI 1) Compiler scheduling (static scheduling) reduces impact of dependences
Dynamic Scheduling Pipelining: Issue instructions in every cycle (CPI 1) Compiler scheduling (static scheduling) reduces impact of dependences Increased compiler complexity, especially when attempting
NOW Handout Page 1. Review from Last Time #1. CSE 820 Graduate Computer Architecture. Lec 8 Instruction Level Parallelism. Outline
CSE 820 Graduate Computer Architecture Lec 8 Instruction Level Parallelism Based on slides by David Patterson Review Last Time #1 Leverage Implicit Parallelism for Performance: Instruction Level Parallelism
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 6 - Hazards
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 6 - Hazards Michela Taufer http://www.cis.udel.edu/~taufer/teaching/cis662f07 Powerpoint Lecture Notes from John Hennessy and David Patterson s: Computer
DYNAMIC SPECULATIVE EXECUTION
DYNAMIC SPECULATIVE EXECUTION Slides by: Pedro Tomás Additional reading: Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach, 5th edition, Chapter 3, John L. Hennessy and David A. Patterson, Morgan Kaufmann,
Super Scalar. Kalyan Basu March 21,
Super Scalar Kalyan Basu basu@cse.uta.edu March 21, 2007 1 Super scalar Pipelines A pipeline that can complete more than 1 instruction per cycle is called a super scalar pipeline. We know how to build
CS 614 COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE II FALL 2004
CS 64 COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE II FALL 004 DUE : October, 005 HOMEWORK II READ : - Portions of Chapters 5, 7, 8 and 9 of the Sima book and - Portions of Chapter 3, 4 and Appendix A of the Hennessy book ASSIGNMENT:
Good luck and have fun!
Midterm Exam October 13, 2014 Name: Problem 1 2 3 4 total Points Exam rules: Time: 90 minutes. Individual test: No team work! Open book, open notes. No electronic devices, except an unprogrammed calculator.
CS433 Midterm. Prof Josep Torrellas. October 19, Time: 1 hour + 15 minutes
CS433 Midterm Prof Josep Torrellas October 19, 2017 Time: 1 hour + 15 minutes Name: Instructions: 1. This is a closed-book, closed-notes examination. 2. The Exam has 4 Questions. Please budget your time.
Outline Review: Basic Pipeline Scheduling and Loop Unrolling Multiple Issue: Superscalar, VLIW. CPE 631 Session 19 Exploiting ILP with SW Approaches
Session xploiting ILP with SW Approaches lectrical and Computer ngineering University of Alabama in Huntsville Outline Review: Basic Pipeline Scheduling and Loop Unrolling Multiple Issue: Superscalar,
COSC121: Computer Systems. ISA and Performance
COSC121: Computer Systems. ISA and Performance Jeremy Bolton, PhD Assistant Teaching Professor Constructed using materials: - Patt and Patel Introduction to Computing Systems (2nd) - Patterson and Hennessy
Chapter 4. Advanced Pipelining and Instruction-Level Parallelism. In-Cheol Park Dept. of EE, KAIST
Chapter 4. Advanced Pipelining and Instruction-Level Parallelism In-Cheol Park Dept. of EE, KAIST Instruction-level parallelism Loop unrolling Dependence Data/ name / control dependence Loop level parallelism
INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO. Architectures for Embedded Computing
UNIVERSIDADE TÉCNICA DE LISBOA INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO Departamento de Engenharia Informática Architectures for Embedded Computing MEIC-A, MEIC-T, MERC Lecture Slides Version 3.0 - English Lecture 09
Exploiting ILP with SW Approaches. Aleksandar Milenković, Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama in Huntsville
Lecture : Exploiting ILP with SW Approaches Aleksandar Milenković, milenka@ece.uah.edu Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Alabama in Huntsville Outline Basic Pipeline Scheduling and Loop
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 7 - Multi-cycles
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 7 - Multi-cycles Michela Taufer http://www.cis.udel.edu/~taufer/teaching/cis662f07 Powerpoint Lecture Notes from John Hennessy and David Patterson s: Computer
EEC 581 Computer Architecture. Instruction Level Parallelism (3.6 Hardware-based Speculation and 3.7 Static Scheduling/VLIW)
1 EEC 581 Computer Architecture Instruction Level Parallelism (3.6 Hardware-based Speculation and 3.7 Static Scheduling/VLIW) Chansu Yu Electrical and Computer Engineering Cleveland State University Overview
Compiler Optimizations. Lecture 7 Overview of Superscalar Techniques. Memory Allocation by Compilers. Compiler Structure. Register allocation
Lecture 7 Overview of Superscalar Techniques CprE 581 Computer Systems Architecture, Fall 2013 Reading: Textbook, Ch. 3 Complexity-Effective Superscalar Processors, PhD Thesis by Subbarao Palacharla, Ch.1
CMSC411 Fall 2013 Midterm 2 Solutions
CMSC411 Fall 2013 Midterm 2 Solutions 1. (12 pts) Memory hierarchy a. (6 pts) Suppose we have a virtual memory of size 64 GB, or 2 36 bytes, where pages are 16 KB (2 14 bytes) each, and the machine has
NOW Handout Page 1. COSC 5351 Advanced Computer Architecture
COSC 5351 Advanced Computer Slides modified from Hennessy CS252 course slides ILP Compiler techniques to increase ILP Loop Unrolling Static Branch Prediction Dynamic Branch Prediction Overcoming Data Hazards
Outline EEL 5764 Graduate Computer Architecture. Chapter 2 - Instruction Level Parallelism. Recall from Pipelining Review
Outline EEL 5764 Graduate Computer Architecture Chapter 2 - Instruction Level Parallelism Ann Gordon-Ross Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Florida ILP Compiler techniques to increase ILP
COSC 6385 Computer Architecture - Pipelining (II)
COSC 6385 Computer Architecture - Pipelining (II) Edgar Gabriel Spring 2018 Performance evaluation of pipelines (I) General Speedup Formula: Time Speedup Time IC IC ClockCycle ClockClycle CPI CPI For a
Donn Morrison Department of Computer Science. TDT4255 ILP and speculation
TDT4255 Lecture 9: ILP and speculation Donn Morrison Department of Computer Science 2 Outline Textbook: Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach, 4th ed Section 2.6: Speculation Section 2.7: Multiple
COSC 6385 Computer Architecture - Instruction Level Parallelism (II)
COSC 6385 Computer Architecture - Instruction Level Parallelism (II) Edgar Gabriel Spring 2016 Data fields for reservation stations Op: operation to perform on source operands S1 and S2 Q j, Q k : reservation
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 7 - Multi-cycles. Interrupts and Exceptions. Device Interrupt (Say, arrival of network message)
CISC 662 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 7 - Multi-cycles Michela Taufer Interrupts and Exceptions http://www.cis.udel.edu/~taufer/teaching/cis662f07 Powerpoint Lecture Notes from John Hennessy
Latencies of FP operations used in chapter 4.
Instruction-Level Parallelism (ILP) ILP: refers to the overlap execution of instructions. Pipelined CPI = Ideal pipeline CPI + structural stalls + RAW stalls + WAR stalls + WAW stalls + Control stalls.
Advanced issues in pipelining
Advanced issues in pipelining 1 Outline Handling exceptions Supporting multi-cycle operations Pipeline evolution Examples of real pipelines 2 Handling exceptions 3 Exceptions In pipelined execution, one
CS 152 Computer Architecture and Engineering. Lecture 13 - Out-of-Order Issue and Register Renaming
CS 152 Computer Architecture and Engineering Lecture 13 - Out-of-Order Issue and Register Renaming Krste Asanovic Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley http://wwweecsberkeleyedu/~krste