Part 11 Compliance SOP
|
|
- Jessie Stokes
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of 14 Part 11 Compliance SOP Document No: SOP_0130 Prepared by: David Brown Date: 16-Aug-2006 Version: 1.0
2 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of 14 Document Approval Name Role Date Signature David Brown Author Document Control Version Author Date Description 1.0 David Brown 16-Aug-2006 First draft.
3 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of 14 Table of Contents 1 Introduction Purpose Scope Definitions Responsibility References Procedure Overview Electronic Signature/Electronic Records Application Specific Requirements Functional Requirement Specification CFR Part 11 Interpretation Practices related to the Use of Electronic Signatures... 14
4 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of 14 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose 1.2 Scope To define the requirements for the design of validated computer systems as they relate to the use of electronic signatures, electronic records, and appropriate operation. Department/Section: IT and Validation Groups This SOP applies to all validated computer systems implemented after 20 th August However, all systems implemented prior to that date should meet the predicate rules of 21 CFR [FDA: Guidance for Industry: Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Scope and Application]. 1.3 Definitions Access Security - Security involves the overall protection of hardware, software, and electronic records from unauthorized or accidental modification, destruction, or disclosure. Biometrics - A method of verifying an individual's identity based on measurement of the individual's physical feature(s) or repeatable action(s) where those features and/or actions are both unique to that individual and measurable. Closed System - An environment in which system access is controlled by persons who are responsible for the content of electronic records that are on the system. Digital Signature - An electronic signature based upon cryptographic methods of originator authentication, computed by using a set of rules and a set of parameters such that the identity of the signatory and the integrity of the data can be verified. Data security The ability to prohibit access to a data record by unauthorized means. Data security involves access control within and external to the application. Electronic Records - Any combination of text, graphics, data, audio, pictorial, or other information representation in digital form that is created, modified, maintained, archived, retrieved, or distributed by a computer system. Electronic Signature - A computer data compilation of any symbol or series of symbols executed, adopted, or authorized by an
5 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of 14 individual to be the legally binding equivalent of the individual's handwritten signature. Handwritten Signature - The scripted name or legal mark of an individual handwritten by that individual and executed or adopted with the present intention to authenticate writing in a permanent form. The act of signing with a writing or marking instrument such as a pen or stylus is preserved. The scripted name or legal mark, while conventionally applied to paper may also be applied to other devices that capture the name or mark. Open System - An environment in which system access is not controlled by persons who are responsible for the content of electronic records that are on the system. System Specifications (also referred to as Specifications) - Document(s) which describe what a system processes or how it provides control. Specifications can include single or multiple sets of documents, such as internal/external design documents, program specifications, functional requirement documents, drawings, electrical drawings, flowcharts, timing diagrams, user guides, technical documents and vendor provided documentation. Client the business system owner is typically the line manager responsible for the business process where the computer system will be used. Validation Group the group responsible for ensuring that computer systems are implemented and maintained in a validated state. IT Group the group responsible for development, operation, and maintenance of computer systems. 1.4 Responsibility Those who commission, develop, configure, maintain, and/or install a validated system are responsible for ensuring that the system complies with this SOP. Validation and client groups are responsible for ensuring that practices related to the use of electronically approved records are incorporated in appropriate client SOP s.
6 Title Part 11 Compliance SOP 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of References Document ID Title 21 CFR Part 11 Part 11 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Electronic Records. Electronic Signatures. N/A FDA: Guidance for Industry: Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Scope and Application. Template_11_0001 Part 11 Assessment Template.
7 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of 14 2 Procedure 2.1 Overview The specific requirements of 21 CFR Part 11 and FDA: Guidance for Industry: Part 11, Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Scope and Application must be considered during the design of a computer system. These requirements must include system configuration, system component integration, access security, and data integrity. The configuration of a computer system is typically decided in the design phase of the system development life cycle. There are often existing constraints that would affect the decision (i.e. existing networks, personnel, and geographical distribution of users and equipment). In any system, security is a major design consideration and should be established early in the design phase. While the possibility of deliberate abuse cannot be ignored, the majority of security breaches are associated with accidental abuse, arising from a lack of user proficiency or poor system design. Training, system access procedures, and sound design are therefore all fundamental requirements of a secure computer system. Due to regulatory requirements for electronic records security, security requirements for computer systems must be adequate to prevent accidental and/or intentional abuse. The following requirements reflect the understanding that security design cannot be absolute or complete, but instead, will reduce risks or exposures. The template [template_11_0001 Part 11 Assessment Template] is provided to assist in conducting an assessment of how the computer system will address the requirements of Part Electronic Signature/Electronic Records Electronic signatures generated while using computer systems that comply with this SOP, are considered to be the legally binding equivalent of the person s handwritten signature. 2.3 Application Specific Requirements The security requirements described in this section are based on regulations presented by FDA in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 11, titled Electronic Signature and Electronic Records. This regulation defines requirements for systems that
8 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of 14 provide functionality for operations as defined in the cgxps. All validated systems employing electronic signatures and/or electronic records, either developed or purchased must comply with the security requirements provided in this SOP. 2.4 Functional Requirement Specification The following section describes requirements that all newly developed or purchased applications requiring validation must comply with, where the application stores electronic records and electronic signatures. These requirements must be included in the Functional Requirement Specification for the application. For applications where electronic records are recorded but an electronic signature is not required, the Functional Requirement Specification does not need to include the requirements in section 3 of the following table Application Security Design Requirements. Any justification for the system deviation from these requirements is to be recorded in the Validation Plan and must be approved by the validation group.
9 Title Part 11 Compliance SOP 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of CFR Part 11 Interpretation The following table provides an interpretation of 21 CFR Part 11. The functionality of new systems should be measured against this interpretation. 1. Operating Systems and Application Software Access Control (see Note 1) 21 CFR Part All users must be positively identified by having a unique user-id and a (d) personal, secret password before being able to gain access to any computer system as verified against the security table at logon. 1.2 The length of passwords must always be checked automatically at the (d) time users choose them, and passwords are recommended to have no fewer than six (6) characters. 1.3 All users must be able to change their passwords at any time (d) 1.4 All users must periodically change their passwords. (It is recommended to change passwords at least once every ninety (90) days). 1.5 Any password that is written to a file or the security database should be encrypted. Suitable encryption standards are RSA (Rivest-Shamir- Adleman), and NIST s Digital Signature Standard, (DSS). [The DSS became Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 186 on December 1, 1994.] Where systems components are linked across application boundaries using automatic log-on sequences, passwords for user-ids with update capability should be read from a secure, encrypted system file, solely accessible to the system manager instead of using "hard-coded" passwords. 1.6 User passwords should not be viewable by anyone including security administrators. 1.7 Users entering new passwords should be required to enter unique passwords. At least one of the following should be used: a) restrict uniqueness of passwords during last six (6) months; b) restrict the re-use of the last 24 passwords (b) (d) (d) (b)
10 Title Part 11 Compliance SOP 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of Methods to restrict access of authorized persons should be employed after five (5) consecutive unsuccessful attempts to enter a password. At least one of the following should be used: a) the involved user-id must be suspended. The Security Administrator is required to reset the password in order for the user to be able to access the system again. b) the system must lock out the user for a period of at least five (5) hours. c) continuous monitoring and alerting functions are employed to detect access failures (d) 1.9 The system must be able to display or report current access rights of a user showing the user-id and all of their access capabilities to resources [e.g., file accesses, grants, permissions, etc.] The system must maintain a log of all security violations in logging into the computer system that include: a) the user-id who created the violation b) date & time of violation c) resource name (if appropriate) A display or report output must be available for viewing the Security Violations History/Log For applications requiring multiple levels of access, provide security controls to restrict access to components of the application by user or user group. If user group controls are utilized, provide functionality to assign users to one or more user groups. Controls should include components of the application which can be accessed such as screens and reports and the type of access allowed such as read, update, or delete. Applications requiring greater level of control should be designed to provide access to the appropriate data or field/data level security capability. 2. Data Integrity 2.1 The capability should be available to backup electronic records on at least a daily basis everywhere electronic records are stored. 2.2 Electronic data distributed on multiple machines should be able to be backed up and restored in a synchronized manner so that recovery of one or more files/servers does not compromise the integrity of the electronic data on the 'system'. The 'system' includes databases on the file servers/clients on all hardware platforms (b) (d) (d) (c) (c)
11 Title Part 11 Compliance SOP 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of Secure, computer-generated, time-stamped audit trails should be used to independently record operator entries and actions that create, modify, or delete electronic records. Record changes should not obscure previously recorded information. In other words, an audit trail must contain sufficient information to allow a reviewer to trace all changes to a record, from its current state back to the original values of the record. Additionally, information within the audit history should contain: a) the user-id; b) the date and time stamp when the record was created, modified, or deleted; c) the new value; d) the old value; e) the transaction type (e.g., inserts, delete, modify) associated with the transaction. This audit trail data must be retained for a period at least as long as that required for the related electronic records. A display or report output must be available for viewing the audit history. This audit trail should be applied electronically a paper audit trail is not sufficient. 2.4 For database applications, transactions since the last backup should be able to be logged in order that synchronized forward data recovery and error processing can be performed. 2.5 File servers and host computers should be operated using Uninterrupted Power Service (UPS), other battery backup measures, or EPROM. 2.6 System privileges must be established that ensure users are only able to modify electronic records in a controlled manner. Update access to the electronic records can ONLY be allowed through validated secured application screens [i.e. no direct user (normal operator) access to electronic records through database tools such as SQL*PLUS]. 2.7 Application objects and application source code must be controlled using either: an automated configuration/version control system that provides change history for objects under control, or by a manual system that maintains previous versions throughout the established retention periods. 2.8 PCs that store electronic records, application configuration data, or software programs should be secured to prevent users from being able to manipulate, override, or otherwise invalidate the electronic records, application code, or operating environment of the system. Where securing of the client workstations is not possible due to environmental and/or technical limitations, automated auditing of the workstations-software components may be employed to satisfy this requirement. This auditing process must be in addition to any security functionality, which can be reasonably implemented and practically maintained at the operating system (e) (c) (c) (g) 11.10(e) 11.10(c)
12 Title Part 11 Compliance SOP 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of Critical records such as lot status or analytical lab data should not be stored in multiple locations unless automatic functions exist to maintain data integrity. The duplicate data should be refreshed at a frequency to satisfy the data currency requirement of the system Concurrent update (write) access by multiple users or processes to a single electronic record must not be allowed Updates to electronic records, which do not occur completely and successfully, should be negated such that all fields associated with the record are restored to their original state (e.g. rollback) Operational system checks must be employed to enforce permitted sequencing of steps and events, as appropriate Device checks should be employed to determine, as appropriate, the validity of the source of data input or operational instruction. For example, an application indicating that data input is derived from a particular device (e.g. balance) should identify the device or allow data entry only from that device and not from a terminal Open systems should include additional measures such as document encryption and use of appropriate digital signature standards to ensure, as necessary under the circumstances, record authenticity, integrity, and confidentiality. 3. Electronic Signatures 3.1 Electronic signatures, though not required, should be employed where application functions perform tasks identified in FDA regulations using the words signature, hand-written signature, notarized, signed, or approved. If electronic signatures are not employed in an application, the requirements in 3.2 through 3.6 below do not have to be met. 3.2 Electronic signatures and handwritten signatures executed to electronic records must be logically linked to their respective electronic records to ensure that the signatures cannot be excised, copied or otherwise transferred so as to falsify an electronic record by ordinary means. 3.3 Signed electronic records should contain information associated with the signing that clearly indicates all of the following: The full name of the signer (first name, middle initial, last name); The user-id of the signer; The date and time when the signature was executed; and The meaning (such as review, approval, responsibility, or authorship) associated with the signature. The above items shall be included as part of any human readable form of the electronic record (such as electronic display or printout). Where the electronic record extends to multiple pages of displays or printouts, the above signing information must clearly be linked to the entire record to which it applies (c) 11.10(c) 11.10(c) 11.10(f) 11.10(h) (a)
13 Title Part 11 Compliance SOP 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of Electronic signatures that are not based upon biometrics must employ at least two distinct identification components such as an identification code and password. When an individual executes a series of signings during a single, continuous period of controlled system access, the first signing must be executed using all electronic signature components; subsequent signings must be executed using at least one electronic signature component that is only executable by, and designed to be used only by, the individual. When an individual executes one or more signings not performed during a single, continuous period of controlled system access, each signing must be executed using all of the electronic signature components. 3.5 Electronic signatures based upon biometrics must be designed to ensure that they cannot be used by anyone other than their genuine owners. 3.6 Electronic signature functions should be able to detect and log attempts at unauthorized use of electronic signatures. 3.7 When an electronic record is approved via a hand-written signature on paper, the paper on which the signature is executed must contain adequate field and date/time information such that the electronic record(s) to which the signature does, and does not, apply can be determined with absolute certainty. The electronic audit trails, in combination with the information on the signed paper, must allow a reviewer to determine the value of each record field at the time the paper was generated. 4. Physical Security 4.1 Application file/database servers that store application electronic records or programs should be located in controlled areas such as computer rooms with adequate physical access security, ventilation, and protection from hazards such as fire, heat, and water. 4.2 Access to the system via dial-up communications must only be provided with a "call back" or SecurID type security system. 4.3 The user session should automatically log-off when a disconnect is detected for dial-up communications. 5. System Administration 5.1 Application should have the ability to generate accurate and complete copies of records in both human readable and electronic form suitable for inspection, review, and copying by the agency (a1) (b) (b) (b) 11.10(c) 11.10(g) 11.10(g) 11.10(b) Notes: 1. Where the logon is performed at the network or operating system level and a separate logon is required for the application, the items apply must be fulfilled at each logon. 2. In the above Design Requirements, the words must and should are used intentionally. The word must implies mandatory compliance. The
14 1.0 Commercial in Confidence 16-Aug of 14 word should is usually applied where optional methods are proposed, available, or possible to meet a particular requirement. The method is regarded as optional, while the need for compliance remains mandatory. Any alternate method used must be justified and appropriately documented. 2.6 Practices related to the Use of Electronic Signatures In certain situations, it is necessary to print out electronic signature records for users who may not have access to the electronic records. This printed signature record should be labelled Copy Verified By: along with the signature and date by the person who verified the printed record was produced by the electronic system. Printed records from an electronic system must not be used in an official manner without including the above statement.
Compliance Matrix for 21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records
Compliance Matrix for 21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records Philip E. Plantz, PhD, Applications Manager David Kremer, Senior Software Engineer Application Note SL-AN-27 Revision B Provided By: Microtrac,
More information21 CFR Part 11 LIMS Requirements Electronic signatures and records
21 CFR Part 11 LIMS Requirements Electronic signatures and records Compiled by Perry W. Burton Version 1.0, 16 August 2014 Table of contents 1. Purpose of this document... 1 1.1 Notes to version 1.0...
More informationISSUE N 1 MAJOR MODIFICATIONS. Version Changes Related Release No. PREVIOUS VERSIONS HISTORY. Version Date History Related Release No.
ISSUE N 1 MAJOR MODIFICATIONS Version Changes Related Release No. 01 First issue. 2.8.0 PREVIOUS VERSIONS HISTORY Version Date History Related Release No. N/A N/A N/A N/A APPROVAL TABLE Signatures below
More information21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE
21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE PRODUCT OVERVIEW ADD-ONS & INDIVIDUAL SOLUTIONS PLA SUPPORT CONTRACT TRAINING CONSULTING 21 CFR PART 11 COMPLIANCE PLA 3.0 Software For Biostatistical Analysis PLA 3.0 21 CFR
More informationWhite Paper Assessment of Veriteq viewlinc Environmental Monitoring System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11Requirements
White Paper Assessment of Veriteq viewlinc Environmental Monitoring System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11Requirements Introduction The 21 CFR Part 11 rule states that the FDA view is that the risks of falsification,
More informationFDA 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance by Metrohm Raman
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance by Metrohm Raman Norms and Standards 21 CFR Part 11 is the FDA rule relating to the use of electronic records and electronic signatures. Recognizing the increasing pact of
More informationWHITE PAPER AGILOFT COMPLIANCE WITH CFR 21 PART 11
WHITE PAPER AGILOFT COMPLIANCE WITH CFR 21 PART 11 with CFR 21 Part 11 Table of Contents with CFR 21 Part 11 3 Overview 3 Verifiable Support for End-User Requirements 3 Electronic Signature Support 3 Precise
More informationAssessment of Vaisala Veriteq viewlinc Continuous Monitoring System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements
/ White PAPer Assessment of Vaisala Veriteq viewlinc Continuous Monitoring System Compliance to 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements The 21 CFR Part 11 rule states that the FDA view is that the risks of falsification,
More informationREGULATION ASPECTS 21 CFR PART11. 57, av. Général de Croutte TOULOUSE (FRANCE) (0) Fax +33 (0)
REGULATION ASPECTS 21 CFR PART11 57, av. Général de Croutte - 31100 TOULOUSE (FRANCE) - +33 (0)5 34 47 40 00 - Fax +33 (0)5 34 47 43 01 Trademarks All names identified by are registered trademarks of the
More information21 CFR Part 11 FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions)
21 CFR Part 11 FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) and Roles and Responsibilities for Assessment of METTLER TOLEDO STAR e Software Version 16.00, including: - 21 CFR 11 Compliance software option for Compliance
More informationExhibitor Software and 21 CFR Part 11
Exhibitor Software and 21 CFR Part 11 Subpart B Electronic Records 15 Columbia Drive Amherst, New Hampshire 03031-2334 No. 11.10 11.10(a) Controls for Closed Systems Validation of systems to ensure accuracy,
More informationSparta Systems TrackWise Digital Solution
Systems TrackWise Digital Solution 21 CFR Part 11 and Annex 11 Assessment February 2018 Systems TrackWise Digital Solution Introduction The purpose of this document is to outline the roles and responsibilities
More informationSparta Systems TrackWise Solution
Systems Solution 21 CFR Part 11 and Annex 11 Assessment October 2017 Systems Solution Introduction The purpose of this document is to outline the roles and responsibilities for compliance with the FDA
More informationSparta Systems Stratas Solution
Systems Solution 21 CFR Part 11 and Annex 11 Assessment October 2017 Systems Solution Introduction The purpose of this document is to outline the roles and responsibilities for compliance with the FDA
More information21 CFR Part 11 Module Design
21 CFR Part 11 Module Design email: info@totallab.com web: www.totallab.com TotalLab Ltd Keel House Garth Heads Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 2JE UK Trademarks The following are either registered trademarks
More informationCOMPLIANCE. associates VALIDATOR WHITE PAPER. Addressing 21 cfr Part 11
VALIDATOR WHITE PAPER Addressing 21 cfr Part 11 Compliance Associates 1 1 INTRODUCTION 21 CFR Part 11 has been become a very large concern in the pharmaceutical industry as of late due to pressure from
More informationThe Impact of 21 CFR Part 11 on Product Development
The Impact of 21 CFR Part 11 on Product Development Product development has become an increasingly critical factor in highly-regulated life sciences industries. Biotechnology, medical device, and pharmaceutical
More informationElectronic Data Processing 21 CFR Part 11
Live Webinar on How Does Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 Ensure Data Integrity & Subject Safety in Clinical Research Wednesday, 19 June 2013 at 10:00 AM PST / 01:00 PM EST ByCharles H. Pierce, MD, PhD,
More informationSDA COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE For Agilent ICP-MS MassHunter Software
SDA COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE For Agilent ICP-MS MassHunter Software Part 11 in Title 21 of the US Code of Federal Regulations (commonly referred to as 21 CFR Part 11) governs food and drugs in the US, and includes
More informationAdobe Sign and 21 CFR Part 11
Adobe Sign and 21 CFR Part 11 Today, organizations of all sizes are transforming manual paper-based processes into end-to-end digital experiences speeding signature processes by 500% with legal, trusted
More informationAgilent Response to 21CFR Part11 requirements for the Agilent ChemStation Plus
Agilent Response to 21CFR Part11 requirements for the Agilent ChemStation Plus 1. Preface This document describes which requirements of the FDA s rule for electronic records and electronic signature (21
More informationChromQuest 5.0. Tools to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance. Introduction. General Overview. General Considerations
ChromQuest 5.0 Tools to Aid in 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Introduction Thermo Scientific, Inc. is pleased to offer the ChromQuest chromatography data system (CDS) as a solution for chromatography labs seeking
More informationIntegration of Agilent OpenLAB CDS EZChrom Edition with OpenLAB ECM Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11
OpenLAB CDS Integration of Agilent OpenLAB CDS EZChrom Edition with OpenLAB ECM Compliance with 21 CFR Part 11 Technical Note Introduction Part 11 in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations includes
More informationAgilent ICP-MS ChemStation Complying with 21 CFR Part 11. Application Note. Overview
Agilent ICP-MS ChemStation Complying with 21 CFR Part 11 Application Note Overview Part 11 in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations includes the US Federal guidelines for storing and protecting electronic
More informationNucleoCounter NC-200, NucleoView NC-200 Software and Code of Federal Regulation 21 Part 11; Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11)
NucleoCounter NC-200, NucleoView NC-200 Software and Code of Federal Regulation 21 Part 11; Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11) A ChemoMetec A/S White Paper March 2014 ChemoMetec
More informationCompliance of Shimadzu Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analyzer with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Regulations on Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures
NT1D-1275 Compliance of Shimadzu Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analyzer with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Regulations on Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures TOC-Control L Ver.1 / LabSolutions DB/CS Ver.6 Part
More informationSystem Assessment Report Relating to Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures; 21 CFR Part 11. System: tiamo (Software Version 2.
Page 1 /15 System Assessment Report Relating to Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures; 21 CFR Part 11 System: tiamo (Software Version 2.5) Page 2 /15 1 Procedures and Controls for Closed Systems
More informationINFORMATION. Guidance on the use of the SM1000 and SM2000 Videographic Recorders for Electronic Record Keeping in FDA Approved Processes
INFORMATION No. INF02/70 Issue 3 Date: October 2007 Product SM1000 and SM2000 Videographic Recorders Manuals IM/SM1000 and IM/SM2000 Guidance on the use of the SM1000 and SM2000 Videographic Recorders
More informationOpenLAB ELN Supporting 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance
OpenLAB ELN Supporting 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance White Paper Overview Part 11 in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations includes the US Federal guidelines for storing and protecting electronic records
More informationIntegration of Agilent UV-Visible ChemStation with OpenLAB ECM
Integration of Agilent UV-Visible ChemStation with OpenLAB ECM Compliance with Introduction in Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations includes the US Federal guidelines for storing and protecting
More informationSystem Assessment Report Relating to Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures; 21 CFR Part 11. System: StabNet (Software Version 1.
Page 1 /16 System Assessment Report Relating to Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures; 21 CFR Part 11 System: StabNet (Software Version 1.1) Page 2 /16 1 Procedures and Controls for Closed Systems
More informationComplianceQuest Support of Compliance to FDA 21 CFR Part 11Requirements WHITE PAPER. ComplianceQuest In-Depth Analysis and Review
ComplianceQuest Support of Compliance to FDA 21 CFR Part 11 WHITE PAPER ComplianceQuest In-Depth Analysis and Review ComplianceQuest Support of Compliance to FDA is the FDA guideline that defines the criteria
More informationTECHNICAL BULLETIN [ 1 / 13 ]
TECHNICAL BULLETIN [ 1 / 13 ] [Title] Guidelines on Compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 11 for the GOT2000 and GOT1000 Series [Date of Issue] November 2014 (Ver. C: November 2017) [Relevant Models] GOT2000
More informationEZChrom Elite Chromatography Data System. Regulatory Compliance with FDA Rule of Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11)
EZChrom Elite Chromatography Data System Regulatory Compliance with FDA Rule of Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures (21 CFR Part 11) Scope On August 20, 1997 the final rule of the United States
More informationUsing "TiNet 2.5 Compliant SR1" software to comply with 21 CFR Part 11
2003-08-08/dö Using "TiNet 2.5 Compliant SR1" software to comply with 21 CFR Part 11 The Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,
More information21 CFR 11 Assistant Software. 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Booklet
21 CFR 11 Assistant Software 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Booklet Notices Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2001-2004, 2009-2010 No part of this manual may be reproduced in any form or by any means (including electronic
More informationSystem Assessment Report Relating to Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures; Final Rule, 21 CFR Part 11
Page 1 /16 System Assessment Report Relating to Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures; Final Rule, 21 CFR Part 11 System: Touch Control for Titrando (Software version 5.840.0150) Page 2 /16 1 Procedures
More informationMetrohm White paper. FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements for NIR Spectroscopy. Dr. N. Rühl
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Requirements for NIR Spectroscopy Dr. N. Rühl The prosperity of a society can be evaluated based on many criteria, and the focus is certainly different for each individual. However,
More informationUsing Chromeleon 7 Chromatography Data System to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11
WHITE PAPER 80078 Using Chromeleon 7 Chromatography Data System to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11 Author Shaun Quinn, Marketing Manager Informatics and Chromatography Software, Thermo Fisher Scientific Keywords
More informationIntroduction. So what is 21 CFR Part 11? Who Should Comply with 21CFR Part 11?
Introduction The following guide is an explanation of the term 21 CFR Part 11, and gives some background into the tools/features that Comark includes in its 21 CFR Part 11 products to aid compliance with
More informationAgilent Technologies Dissolution Workstation Software Electronic Records and Data Storage Background
Agilent Technologies Electronic Records and Data Storage Background Page 1 of 20 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 User Administration... 4 System Administration... 7 Method Management... 11 Method Execution...
More informationSystem Assessment Report Relating to Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures; Final Rule, 21 CFR Part 11. System: tiamo 2.3
Page 1 /14 System Assessment Report Relating to Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures; Final le, 21 CFR Part 11 System: tiamo 23 052011 / doe Page 2 /14 1 Procedures and Controls for Closed Systems
More informationElectronic Records and Signatures with the Sievers M9 TOC Analyzer and DataPro2 Software
Water Technologies & Solutions fact sheet 21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records and Signatures with the Sievers M9 TOC Analyzer and DataPro2 Software introduction Part 11 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal
More informationUsing Chromeleon Chromatography Management Software to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11
Technical Note 54 Using Chromeleon Chromatography Management Software to Comply with 21 CFR Part 11 The Electronic Records and Signatures Rule 1, known as 21 CFR Part 11, was established by the U.S. Food
More informationReal World Examples for Part 11 Technical Controls
Wolfgang Winter Product Manager, Networked Data Systems 23. January 2003 Real World Examples for Part 11 Technical Controls Time: 3.00 p.m. Central European Time Telephone Number: +44 20 8240 8243 Chair
More informationTechnical Information
Technical Information TI 04L55B01-04EN SMARTDAC+ GM Advanced Security Functions White Paper for FDA 21 CFR Part 11 The contents of this Technical Information are subject to change without notice. Yokogawa
More informationValidation Checklist Appendix A WiZARD2 Secure and 21 CFR 11 Requirements
Appendix A Procedures and Controls for Closed Systems (check = yes) (check = yes) Customers may devise their own validation protocols that may or may not be compliant with 21 CFR 11 Is the system validated?
More informationAutomation Change Management for Regulated Industries
Automation Change Management for Regulated Industries Achieving Part 11 Compliance A White Paper Synopsis This whitepaper provides information related to FDA regulation 21 CFR Part 11 (Part 11) for organizations
More informationIntroduction 2. History. Adapted to zenon version 6.20 (MH) January 13 th, 2006
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Introduction 2 History Date January 13 th, 2006 Comment Adapted to zenon version 6.20 (MH) 1994 COPA-DATA GmbH All rights reserved. Distribution and/or reproduction of this document
More informationSECURITY & PRIVACY DOCUMENTATION
Okta s Commitment to Security & Privacy SECURITY & PRIVACY DOCUMENTATION (last updated September 15, 2017) Okta is committed to achieving and preserving the trust of our customers, by providing a comprehensive
More informationLeveraging ALCOA+ Principles to Establish a Data Lifecycle Approach for the Validation and Remediation of Data Integrity. Bradford Allen Genentech
Leveraging ALCOA+ Principles to Establish a Data Lifecycle Approach for the Validation and Remediation of Data Integrity Bradford Allen Genentech 1 Agenda Introduction Data Integrity 101 Review What is
More informationABB Limited. Table of Content. Executive Summary
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures Guidance for Industry Scope of Application Position Paper: A Summary and Interpretation of the Guidance Note: This document has been prepared based
More informationUsing "IC Net 2.2 " software to comply with 21 CFR Part 11
CH-9101 Herisau/Switzerland E-Mail info@metrohm.com Internet www.metrohm.com Using "IC Net 2.2 " software to comply with 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance white paper 8.110.8273 CH-9101 Herisau/Switzerland E-Mail
More informationNIST Risk Assessment for Part 11 Compliance: Evaluation of a GXP Case Study
NIST Risk Assessment for Part 11 Compliance: Evaluation of a GXP Case Study Monica Fanjoy* 109 Fairground Road, Holly Springs, NC 27540, USA Summary Current guidance for compliance with 21 Code of Federal
More informationEXCERPT. NIST Special Publication R1. Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations
EXCERPT NIST Special Publication 800-171 R1 Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations An Excerpt Listing All: Security Requirement Families & Controls Security
More informationUsing the Titrando system to comply with 21 CFR Part 11
06.2006/jb Using the Titrando system to comply with 21 CFR Part 11 The Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, known as
More information21 CFR PART 11 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS)
21 CFR PART 11 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (S) The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines the criteria under which electronic records and electronic signatures are considered trustworthy,
More informationGuidelines for applying FactoryTalk View SE in a 21 CFR Part 11 environment
FactoryTalk View Site Edition (SE) Complying with 21 CFR Part 11: Electronic Records & Signatures Guidelines for applying FactoryTalk View SE in a 21 CFR Part 11 environment Doc ID FTALK-WP003C-EN-E Page
More informationSpectroscopy Configuration Manager (SCM) Software. 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Booklet
Spectroscopy Configuration Manager (SCM) Software 21 CFR Part 11 Compliance Booklet Notices Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2006-2007 and 2009-2011 No part of this manual may be reproduced in any form or by
More informationInformation Security Policy
April 2016 Table of Contents PURPOSE AND SCOPE 5 I. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 5 II. SCOPE 6 ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION SECURITY 6 I. RESPONSIBILITY FOR INFORMATION SECURITY 6 II. COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING
More information90% 191 Security Best Practices. Blades. 52 Regulatory Requirements. Compliance Report PCI DSS 2.0. related to this regulation
Compliance Report PCI DSS 2.0 Generated by Check Point Compliance Blade, on April 16, 2018 15:41 PM O verview 1 90% Compliance About PCI DSS 2.0 PCI-DSS is a legal obligation mandated not by government
More informationStandard Development Timeline
Standard Development Timeline This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard is adopted by the NERC Board of Trustees (Board).
More informationStandard CIP Cyber Security Systems Security Management
A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Systems Security Management 2. Number: CIP-007-1 3. Purpose: Standard CIP-007 requires Responsible Entities to define methods, processes, and procedures for securing
More informationDFARS Requirements for Defense Contractors Must Be Satisfied by DECEMBER 31, 2017
DFARS 252.204-7012 Requirements for Defense Contractors Must Be Satisfied by DECEMBER 31, 2017 As with most government documents, one often leads to another. And that s the case with DFARS 252.204-7012.
More informationCIP Cyber Security Configuration Management and Vulnerability Assessments
Standard Development Timeline This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective. Development Steps Completed
More informationUsing the Titrando system to comply with 21 CFR Part 11
01.2003/sn Using the Titrando system to comply with 21 CFR Part 11 The Electronic Records and Signatures Rule, known as 21 CFR Part 11, was established by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to
More informationEU Annex 11 Compliance Regulatory Conformity of eve
White Paper EU Annex 11 Compliance Regulatory Conformity of eve Franco Berz, Head of Quality Management INFORS HT Dr. Britta Abellan, Computer System Validation Manager INFORS HT 1. Introduction More and
More informationtesto Comfort Software CFR 4 Instruction manual
testo Comfort Software CFR 4 Instruction manual 2 1 Contents 1 Contents 1 Contents... 3 2 Specifications... 4 2.1. Intended purpose... 4 2.2. 21 CFR Part 11 and terminology used... 5 3 First steps... 9
More informationCIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments
CIP-010-2 3 Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments 2. Number:
More informationCIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments
Standard Development Timeline This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes effective. Development Steps Completed
More information1. Post for 45-day comment period and pre-ballot review. 7/26/ Conduct initial ballot. 8/30/2010
Standard CIP 011 1 Cyber Security Protection Standard Development Roadmap This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes
More informationPCI DSS Compliance. Verba SOLUTION GUIDE. Introduction. Verba and the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
Introduction Verba provides a complete compliance solution for merchants and service providers who accept and/or process payment card data over the telephone. Secure and compliant handling of a customer
More informationFairWarning Mapping to PCI DSS 3.0, Requirement 10
FairWarning Mapping to PCI DSS 3.0, Requirement 10 Requirement 10: Track and monitor all access to network resources and cardholder data Logging mechanisms and the ability to track user activities are
More information5. The technology risk evaluation need only be updated when significant changes or upgrades to systems are implemented.
Annex to the Financial Services Businesses Handbook Using Technology in the Customer Due Diligence Process A.1. Technology Risk Evaluation 1. A financial services business must, prior to deciding whether
More informationNIST Compliance Controls
NIST 800-53 Compliance s The following control families represent a portion of special publication NIST 800-53 revision 4. This guide is intended to aid McAfee, its partners, and its customers, in aligning
More informationRev.1 Solution Brief
FISMA-NIST SP 800-171 Rev.1 Solution Brief New York FISMA Cybersecurity NIST SP 800-171 EventTracker 8815 Centre Park Drive, Columbia MD 21045 About EventTracker EventTracker delivers business critical
More informationData Inventory and Classification, Physical Devices and Systems ID.AM-1, Software Platforms and Applications ID.AM-2 Inventory
Audience: NDCBF IT Security Team Last Reviewed/Updated: March 2018 Contact: Henry Draughon hdraughon@processdeliveysystems.com Overview... 2 Sensitive Data Inventory and Classification... 3 Applicable
More informationStandard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification
Standard CIP 002 1 Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification Standard Development Roadmap This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed
More informationMySign Electronic Signature
MySign Electronic Signature Advisory Circular Compliance Matrix FAA AC 120 78A Dated 06/22/16 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Purpose 3 FAA Acceptance 3 Non Requirement for Approval 3 2-2 Electronic
More informationStandard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification
Standard CIP 002 1 Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification Standard Development Roadmap This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed
More informationEmployee Security Awareness Training Program
Employee Security Awareness Training Program Date: September 15, 2015 Version: 2015 1. Scope This Employee Security Awareness Training Program is designed to educate any InComm employee, independent contractor,
More informationCIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments
CIP-010-2 Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments 2. Number:
More informationThe Common Controls Framework BY ADOBE
The Controls Framework BY ADOBE The following table contains the baseline security subset of control activities (derived from the Controls Framework by Adobe) that apply to Adobe s enterprise offerings.
More informationRecommendations for Implementing an Information Security Framework for Life Science Organizations
Recommendations for Implementing an Information Security Framework for Life Science Organizations Introduction Doug Shaw CISA, CRISC Director of CSV & IT Compliance Azzur Consulting Agenda Why is information
More informationAccess to University Data Policy
UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA Health Sciences Center Information Technology Security Policy Access to University Data Policy 1. Purpose This policy defines roles and responsibilities for protecting OUHSC s non-public
More informationThe University of Texas at El Paso. Information Security Office Minimum Security Standards for Systems
The University of Texas at El Paso Information Security Office Minimum Security Standards for Systems 1 Table of Contents 1. Purpose... 3 2. Scope... 3 3. Audience... 3 4. Minimum Standards... 3 5. Security
More informationData Integrity and Worldwide Regulatory Guidance
20 Data Integrity and Worldwide Regulatory Guidance Rohit A. Patil, Shruti N.Patil Department of Regulatory Affairs Supreme Pharma Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai rohitpharma3250@gmail.com ABSTRACT Good storage
More informationData Storage, Recovery and Backup Checklists for Public Health Laboratories
Data Storage, Recovery and Backup Checklists for Public Health Laboratories DECEMBER 2018 Introduction Data play a critical role in the operation of a laboratory information management system (LIMS) and
More informationAchieving 21 CFR Part11 Compliance using Exaquantum/Batch Authored by Stelex
Technical Information TI 36J04B11-01E Achieving 21 CFR Part11 Compliance using Exaquantum/Batch Authored by Stelex Yokogawa Electric Corporation 2-9-32, Nakacho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo, 180-8750 Japan
More informationAfilias DNSSEC Practice Statement (DPS) Version
Afilias DNSSEC Practice Statement (DPS) Version 1.07 2018-02-26 Page 1 of 8 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Overview This document was created using the template provided under the current practicing documentation.
More informationPage 1 of 15. Applicability. Compatibility EACMS PACS. Version 5. Version 3 PCA EAP. ERC NO ERC Low Impact BES. ERC Medium Impact BES
002 5 R1. Each Responsible Entity shall implement a process that considers each of the following assets for purposes of parts 1.1 through 1.3: i. Control Centers and backup Control Centers; ii. Transmission
More informationACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE RECORDS
BAC-AW-04 Issue: 1 Effective: 9-Jan-17 ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC MAINTENANCE RECORDS GENERAL Bermuda Advisory Circulars are issued to provide advice, guidance and information on standards, practices and
More informationCIP Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments
CIP 010 1 Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Configuration Change Management and Vulnerability Assessments 2. Number:
More informationLOGGING AND AUDIT TRAILS
LOGGING AND AUDIT TRAILS Policy LOGGING AND AUDIT TRAILS - POLICY TMP-POL-LAT V3.00-EN, 26/06/2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1 Document Purpose... 3 1.2 Target Audience...3 1.3 Business Context...4
More informationAshford Board of Education Ashford, Connecticut POLICY REGARDING RETENTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND INFORMATION
Ashford Board of Education Ashford, Connecticut Series 2000 Administration POLICY REGARDING RETENTION OF ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND INFORMATION I. POLICY The Board of Education (the Board ) complies with all
More informationUT HEALTH SAN ANTONIO HANDBOOK OF OPERATING PROCEDURES
ACCESS MANAGEMENT Policy UT Health San Antonio shall adopt access management processes to ensure that access to Information Resources is restricted to authorized users with minimal access rights necessary
More informationGDPR Processor Security Controls. GDPR Toolkit Version 1 Datagator Ltd
GDPR Processor Security Controls GDPR Toolkit Version 1 Datagator Ltd Implementation Guidance (The header page and this section must be removed from final version of the document) Purpose of this document
More informationAnnex 3 to NIST Special Publication Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems
Annex 3 to NIST Special Publication 800-53 Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information Systems Minimum Security Controls High Baseline Includes updates through 04-22-2005 AC-1 ACCESS CONTROL
More informationCIP Cyber Security Personnel & Training
A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Personnel & Training 2. Number: CIP-004-5.1 3. Purpose: To minimize the risk against compromise that could lead to misoperation or instability in the BES from individuals
More informationStandard CIP 007 3a Cyber Security Systems Security Management
A. Introduction 1. Title: Cyber Security Systems Security Management 2. Number: CIP-007-3a 3. Purpose: Standard CIP-007-3 requires Responsible Entities to define methods, processes, and procedures for
More information