How validation and verification work in JCM. 22 January 2014 Kenta Usui Climate and Energy Area, IGES

Transcription

1 How validation and verification work in JCM 22 January 2014 Kenta Usui Climate and Energy Area, IGES 1

2 TPE is a quality keeper in JCM Joint Committee Development and revision of guidelines Project registration Approval of methodologies Accreditation of TPEs Project participants ii Third Party Entities i Project Implementation Validation Monitoring Verification of GHG reduction implementation and avoidance 2

3 Validation TPE Document Review Site visit (If necessary) Draft Validation Report Validation Report and opinion i PPs 3

4 Verification TPE Document Review Site visit (If necessary) Draft verification report Verification Report and opinion i PPs Good monitoring and monitoring report are important for smooth verification. Validation ensures that monitoring plan is accurate and feasible. 4

5 Document Review Site visit (If necessary) Draft Validation Report Validation Report and opinion Check Project Design Document including Monitoring Plan PDD A. Project Description B. Application of approved methodology C. Emission Reduction D. Environmental impact assessment E. Local stakeholder consultation Others, Monitoring sheet (as a part of attachment) Excel sheet for Monitoring and calculation 5

6 11 Check points for validation A: Generic (5) Related to general feature of projects B: Methodology specific (3) Checking consistency with applied methodology C: Outreach (3) Consultation with a range of stakeholders 6

7 A: Generic Item Key questions 6.2 Project Design Is the PDD using the latest form? Document form Is PDD written in line with PDD and Monitoring guidelines? 6.3 Project Is the PDD accurate, complete and understandable? description 6.10 Modalities of communications TPE validates corporate identify of project participants and a focal point. Is the Modalities of Communication (see form) correctly completed and authorised? 6.11 Avoidance of Is the proposed project NOT registered under other double international climate mitigation mechanisms (e.g. CDM)? registration 6.12 Start of Is the project starting in/after 2013? operation 7

8 B:Methodology specific Item Key questions 6.4 Application of Is the project eligible for selected methodology? approved Is the methodology up to date? methodologies 6.5Emission sources AreallGHG sourcescoveredcovered by the methodology addressed and calculation if to calculate project and reference scenarios? emission reductions If the project proposes pre fixed values (which does not require monitoring), are they appropriate? 6.8 Monitoring Is the monitoring plan based on the approved methodologies, PDD and monitoring guidelines? Are monitoring points for measurement appropriate? Are monitoring i equipment appropriate? 8

9 C:Outreach Item Key questions 6.6 Environmental Have project participants conducted dan EIA according to impact assessment Mongolian laws? 6.7Local stakeholder Were local stakeholders consulted? consultation 6.9 Public inputs Are all public inputs to the PDD taken into account by project participants? 9

10 Document Review Site visit (If necessary) Draft Validation Report Validation Report and opinion TPE visit theactual project site and interview relevant stakeholders Sometimes conducted by phone May need to create Interview Plan, 10

11 Example of interviewees 1. Project proponent Technical implementation Financing Monitoring 2. Operators Grid network Electric power mix in the future Grid carbon emission factor 3. NGOs Environmental and social issues 11

12 Document Review Site visit (If necessary) Draft Validation Report Validation Report and opinion Draftthevalidationreport the report, clarifyingpoints that project participant need to address. (See the form). 12

13 Three types of Requests Corrective Action Request (CAR) Clarification Request (CL) There is a mistake Validation/verification requirements are not met Risk that emission reductions cannot be calculated Provided information is not sufficient or unclear Forward daction Review is required at the first or next Request (FAR) verification 13

14 Document Review Site visit (If necessary) Draft Validation Report Validation Report and opinion Validation Report The result of validation (positive/negative) Means of validation, findings (CAR, CL, FAR), and conclusion based on reporting requirements Information on public inputs List of interviewees and documents received Information on what PP has done to resolve issues identified by TPE. 14

15 iges.or.jp 15