Semantic Web. Ontology and OWL. Morteza Amini. Sharif University of Technology Fall 95-96
|
|
- Mark Cox
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ه عا ی Semantic Web Ontology and OWL Morteza Amini Sharif University of Technology Fall 95-96
2 Outline Introduction & Definitions Ontology Languages OWL (Ontology Web Language) 2
3 Outline Introduction & Definitions Ontology Languages OWL (Ontology Web Language) 3
4 Where does it come from? ontology n. Philosophy 1692; lat. phil. onto- being + -logia study of The study of what is, what has to be true for something to exist, the kinds of things that can exist. AI and computer science Something exists if it can be represented, described, defined (in a formal, hence, machine-interpretable way). 4
5 Ontologies 5
6 Ontologies (contd.) Ontologies are about vocabularies and their meanings, with explicit, expressive, and well-defined semantics, possibly machine-interpretable. Ontology is a formal specification of a shared conceptualization. Gruber, 1993 Main elements of an ontology: Concepts Relationships Hierarchical Logical Properties Instances (individuals) 6
7 Ontologies in Semantic Web Although XML DTDs and XML Schemas are sufficient for exchanging data between parties who have agreed to definitions beforehand, their lack of semantics prevent machines from reliably performing this task given new XML vocabularies. RDF and RDF Schema begin to approach this problem by allowing simple semantics to be associated with identifiers. With RDF Schema, one can define classes that may have multiple subclasses and super classes, and can define properties, which may have sub properties, domains, and ranges. In this sense, RDF Schema is a simple ontology language. However, in order to achieve interoperation between numerous, autonomously developed and managed schemas, richer semantics are needed. For example, RDF Schema cannot specify that the Person and Car classes are disjoint, or that a string quartet has exactly four musicians as members. 7
8 For Machines... The meaning of the document is not defined. Machines cannot understand it. XML document We are defining the structure of document by XML, but now the meaning of the structure is not defined. <Sentence> <Subject> Paper </Subject> <Verb> is made from </Verb> <Object> Wood </Object> </Sentence> <Σεντενχε> <Συβϕεχτ> Παπερ </Συβϕεχτ> <ςερβ> ισ µαδε φροµ </ςερβ> <Οβϕεχτ> Ωοοδ </Οβϕεχτ> </Σεντενχε> 8
9 Ontology Gives the Meaning... Natural Language Document <Σεντενχε> <Συβϕεχτ> Παπερ </Συβϕεχτ> <ςερβ> ισ µαδε φροµ </ςερβ> <Οβϕεχτ> Ωοοδ </Οβϕεχτ> </Σεντενχε> Ontology 9
10 Why Develop Ontologies? To share common understanding of the structure of information among people or agents and share knowledge E.g., using an ontology for integrating terminologies To reuse domain knowledge E.g., geography ontology To make domain assumptions explicit Facilitate knowledge management, easier to validate, to change, Enable new users to learn about the domain To support interoperability. Terms defined in expressive ontologies allow for mapping precisely how one term relates to another 10
11 Outline Introduction & Definitions Ontology Languages OWL (Ontology Web Language) 11
12 Ontology Languages Graphical notations Semantic networks Topic maps UML RDF(S) Logic based Description Logics (e.g., OIL, DAML+OIL, OWL) Rules (e.g., RuleML, LP/Prolog, SWRL) First Order Logic 12
13 Ontology Languages RDF(S) (Resource Description Framework (Schema)) OIL (Ontology Interchange Language) DAML+OIL (DARPA Agent Markup Language + OIL) OWL (Ontology Web Language) XOL (XML-based Ontology Exchange Language) SHOE (Simple HTML Ontology Extension) OML (Ontology Markup Language) 13
14 Object Oriented Model Many languages use object oriented model: Objects/Instances/Individuals Elements of the domain of discourse Equivalent to constants in FOL Types/Classes/Concepts Sets of objects sharing certain characteristics Equivalent to unary predicates in FOL and Concepts in DL Relations/Properties/Roles Sets of pairs (tuples) of objects Equivalent to binary predicates in FOL and Roles in DL 14
15 Outline Introduction & Definitions Ontology Languages OWL (Ontology Web Language) 15
16 OWL (Ontology Web Language) OWL is now a W3C Recommendation. The purpose of OWL is identical to RDFS i.e. to provide an XML vocabulary to define classes, properties and their relationships. RDFS enables us to express very rudimentary relationships and has limited inferencing capability. OWL enables us to express much richer relationships, thus yielding a much enhanced inferencing capability. The benefit of OWL is that it facilitates a much greater degree of inference than you get with RDF Schema. 16
17 Origins of OWL DARPA Agent Markup Language DAML OIL Ontology Interchange Language EU/NSF Joint Ad hoc Committee DAML+OIL RDF(S) All influenced by RDF A W3C Recommendation OWL OWL Lite OWL DL OWL Full 17
18 OWL OWL and RDF Schema enable rich machine-processable semantics. OWL RDF Schema Semantics RDFS <rdfs:class rdf:id="river"> <rdfs:subclassof rdf:resource="#stream"/> </rdfs:class> XML/DTD/XML Schemas Syntax OWL <owl:class rdf:id="river"> <rdfs:subclassof rdf:resource="#stream"/> </owl:class> 18
19 OWL Design Goals Shared ontologies Ontology interoperability Inconsistency detection Expressivity vs. scalability Ease of use Compatibility with other standards Internationalization 19
20 Versions of OWL Depending on the intended usage, OWL provides three increasingly expressive sublanguages. Full Very expressive, no computation (decidability) guarantees. DL (Description Logic) Maximum expressiveness, computationally complete (decidable). OWL Full OWL DL OWL Lite Lite Simple classification hierarchy with simple constraints. 20
21 Comparison of Versions OWL Lite supports those users primarily needing a classification hierarchy and simple constraints. E.g., while it supports cardinality constraints, it only permits cardinality values of 0 or 1 OWL DL supports those users who want the maximum expressiveness while retaining decidability. OWL DL includes all OWL language constructs, but they can be used only under certain restrictions (e.g., while a class may be a subclass of many classes, a class cannot be an instance of another class). OWL DL is so named due to its correspondence with description logics. OWL Full is meant for users who want maximum expressiveness and the syntactic freedom of RDF with no computational guarantees. For example, in OWL Full a class can be treated simultaneously as a collection of individuals and as an individual in its own right. 21
22 OWL vs. RDFS OWL allows greater expressiveness (more meaning) Abstraction mechanism to group resources with similar characteristics Much more powerful in describing constraints on relations between classes Property transitivity, equivalence, symmetry, etc. Extensive support for reasoning 22
23 OWL vs. RDFS RDF Schema provides some of predefined properties: rdfs:range used to indicate the range of values for a property. rdfs:domain used to associate a property with a class. rdfs:subpropertyof used to specialize a property. OWL provides additional predefined properties: owl:cardinality (indicate cardinality) owl:hasvalue (at least one of the specified property values) OWL provides additional property classes, which allow reasoning and inferencing: owl:functionalproperty owl:transitiveproperty 23
24 OWL/XML Declaration Similar to RDF, containing owl name space. <rdf:rdf xmlns:owl= xmlns:rdf= xmlns:rdfs= xmlns:ex= > </rdf:rdf>... 24
25 OWL Ontologies What s inside an OWL ontology Classes + class-hierarchy Properties (Slots) / values Relations between classes (inheritance, disjoints, equivalents) Restrictions on properties (type, cardinality) Characteristics of properties (transitive, ) Individuals... Reasoning tasks: classification, consistency checking, 25
26 Classes What is a Class? e.g., person, pet, old a collection of individuals (object, things,... ) a way of describing part of the world an object in the world (OWL Full) 26
27 OWL Classes owl:class Subclass of Class in RDF Better to forget about classes of classes in this course Top-most class: owl:thing Bottom class: owl:nothing <owl:class rdf:id= Person"/> <owl:class rdf:id= Man"> <rdfs:subclassof rdf:resource="#person" /> </owl:class> 27
28 Describing Classes in OWL Complex Classes Union of classes (owl:unionof) OR (A B) Intersection of classes (owl:intersectionof) AND (A B) Complement (owl:complementof) NOT (ØA) Enumeration (owl:oneof) Disjoint Classes (owl:disjointwith) 28
29 Example <owl:class rdf:id= Parent /> <owl:calss rdf:id= Man > <owl:subclassof rdf:resource=#person /> <owl:disjointwith rdf:resource=#woman /> </owl:class> <owl:class rdf:id= Father > <owl:intersectionof rdf:parsetype= Collection > <owl:class rdf:about= #Parent /> <owl:class rdf:about= #Man /> </owl:intersectionof> </owl:class> <owl:class rdf:id= Nationality > <owl:oneof rdf:parsetype= Collection > <owl:thing rdf:about= #Iranian /> <owl:thing rdf:about= #Japanese />... </owl:oneof> </owl:class> 29
30 Example <owl:calss rdf:id= A > <owl:intersectionof rdf:parsetype= Collection > <owl:class> <owl:oneof rdf:parsetype= Collection > <owl:thing rdf:about= #x1 /> <owl:thing rdf:about= #x2 />... </owl:oneof> </owl:class> <owl:class> <owl:unionof rdf:parsetype= Collection > <owl:class rdf:about= #B /> <owl:class rdf:about= #C />... </owl:unionof> </owl:class> <owl:class> <owl:complementof rdf:resource= #D /> </owl:class> </owl:intersectionof> </owl:class> A {x1, x2} (BC) D 30
31 Properties What is a Property? e.g., has_father, has_pet, service_number a collection of relationships between individuals (and data) a way of describing a kind of relationship between individuals 31
32 OWL Properties Object Properties Data type Properties Ana owns Cuba Ana age 25 32
33 Describing Properties in OWL OWL Property Classes An ObjectProperty relates one Resource to another Resource. A DatatypeProperty relates one Resource to a Literal - an XML Schema data type. rdf:property owl:objectproperty owl:datatypeproperty owl:functionalproperty owl:inversefunctionalproperty owl:symmetricproperty owl:transitiveproperty 33
34 Defining Properties We have RDFS facilities as well. rdfs:subpropertyof rdfs:domain rdfs:range <owl:objectproperty rdf:id="madefrom"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#book"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#paper"/> </owl:objectproperty> <owl:objectproperty rdf:id= fatherof"> <rdfs:subpropertyof rdf:resource="#parentof"/> </owl:objectproperty> <owl:datatypeproperty rdf:id= hasage"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#person" /> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&xsd;positiveinteger"/> </owl:datatypeproperty> 34
35 Transitive Properties X p Y Y p Z imply X p Z Transitivity existed already in RDF rdfs:subclassof, rdfs:subpropertyof Example: locatedin <owl:transitiveproperty rdf:id= locatedin"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#region"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#region"/> </owl:transitiveproperty> 35
36 Symmetric Properties X p Y implies Y p X Example: colleagueof <owl:symmetricproperty rdf:id= colleagueof"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#person"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#person"/> </owl:symmetricproperty> 36
37 Functional Properties X p Y X p Z imply Z is the same as Y (describe the same) Example: hashusband <owl:functionalproperty rdf:id= hashusband"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#woman"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#man"/> </owl:functionalproperty> 37
38 Inverse Functional Properties Y p X Z p X imply Z is the same as Y (describe the same) Example: ismotherof <owl:inversefunctionalproperty rdf:id= ismotherof"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#woman"/> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#person"/> </owl:inversefunctionalproperty> 38
39 Individuals and Their Properties Two equivalent declarations: <Person rdf:id= ahmadi" /> OR <owl:thing rdf:id= ahmadi" /> <owl:thing rdf:about="#ahmadi"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="#person"/> </owl:thing> Properties of an individual < Person rdf:id= reza" /> <owl:thing rdf:about="#ahmadi"> <fatherof rdf:resource="#reza"/> <hasage rdf:datatype= &xsd;positiveinteger >42</hasAge> </owl:thing> 39
40 Individuals owl:sameas Links two references to an individual. owl:differentfrom Indicates two URI references refer to different individuals. owl:alldifferent All individuals in the list are all different from each other. <owl:alldifferent> <owl:distinctmembers rdf:parsetype= Collection > <Person rdf:about= #ali /> <Person rdf:about= #reza /> <Person rdf:about= #maryam /> </owl:distinctmembers> </owl:alldifferent> <Person rdf:id= ali"> <owl:differentfrom rdf:resource="#reza"/> <owl:sameas rdf:resource="#morteza"/> </Person> 40
41 OWL Distributed owl:equivalentclass for describing equivalent classes. owl:equivalentproperty for describing equivalent properties. Guitar Guitarra Internationalization standards? 41
42 Example <owl:class rdf:id="daponteoperaofmozart"> <owl:equivalentclass> <owl:class> <owl:oneof rdf:parsetype="collection"> <Opera rdf:about="#nozze_di_figaro"/> <Opera rdf:about="#don_giovanni"/> <Opera rdf:about="#cosi_fan_tutte"/> </owl:oneof> </owl:class> </owl:equivalentclass> </owl:class> 42
43 OWL Property Restriction Property restriction is a kind of class description. Property Restrictions Defining a Class by restricting its possible instances via their property values. OWL distinguishes between the following two: Value constraints Cardinality constraints 43
44 OWL Value Constraints Puts constraints on the range of the property when applied to this particular class description. Properties: allvaluesfrom: rdfs:class (lite/dl owl:class) hasvalue: specific Individual somevaluesfrom: rdfs:class (lite/dl owl:class) <owl:restriction> <owl:onproperty rdf:resource= #hasparent /> <owl:somevaluesfrom rdf:resource= #Physician > </owl:restriction> <owl:class rdf:id= AliChildren > <rdfs:equivalentclass> <owl:restriction> <owl:onproperty rdf:resource= #hasparent /> <owl:hasvalue rdf:resource= #ali > </owl:restriction> </rdfs:equivalentclass> <owl:class> Class Description 44
45 OWL Cardinality Constraints Any instance of a class may have an arbitrary number (zero or more) of values for a particular property. To restrict the cardinality of properties locally with in a class context, the following constructs can be used. owl:mincardinality type: xsd:nonnegativeinteger (in lite {0,1}) owl:maxcardinality type: xsd:nonnegativeinteger (in lite {0,1}) owl:cardinality type: xsd:nonnegativeinteger (in lite {0,1}) Example: Fathers have at least two children. <owl:class rdf:id= Father > <owl:restriction owl:mincardinality= 2"> <owl:onproperty rdf:resource="#haschild" /> </owl:restriction> </owl:class> 45
46 An Example of OWL Ontology <owl:class rdf:id= Person /> <owl:class rdf:id= Man > <rdfs:subclassof rdf:resource= #Person /> <owl:disjointwith rdf:resource= #Woman /> </owl:class> <owl:class rdf:id= Woman > <rdfs:subclassof rdf:resource= #Person /> <owl:disjointwith rdf:resource= #Man /> </owl:class> <owl:class rdf:id= Father > <rdfs:subclassof rdf:resource= Man /> <owl:restriction owl:mincardinality="1"> <owl:onproperty rdf:resource="#haschild" /> </owl:restriction> </owl:class> <owl:objectproperty rdf:id= haschild"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#person" /> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="#person" /> </owl:objectproperty> 46
47 Introduction to OWL2: Version 2 of OWL OWL2 has a very similar overall structure to OWL1. Backwards compatibility with OWL1 is, to all intents and purposes, complete: all OWL1 Ontologies remain valid OWL2 Ontologies, with identical inferences in all practical cases. OWL2 adds new functionality with respect to OWL1. Some of the new features are syntactic sugar (e.g., disjoint union of classes) Others offer new expressivity, including: Keys: a collection of properties can be assigned as a key to a class. Property chains: to define properties as a composition of other properties. Richer datatypes and data ranges: capability of custom datatype definition. Qualified cardinality restrictions: supporting n R.C and n R.C and =n R.C Asymmetric, reflexive, and disjoint properties 47
48 OWL2 Profiles (1) OWL2 also defines three new profiles. Profiles considered Useful computational properties, e.g., reasoning complexity Implementation possibilities, e.g., using RDBs 48
49 OWL 2 three different tractable profiles: OWL2 EL: polynomial time reasoning for schema (ontology consistency and subsumption) Useful for ontologies with large conceptual part OWL2 QL: fast (logspace) query answering using RDBMs via SQL Useful for large datasets already stored in RDBs OWL2 RL: fast (polynomial) query answering using rule extended DBs Useful for large datasets stored as RDF triples 49
50 OWL2 Profiles (2) OWL2 EL is particularly useful in applications employing ontologies that contain very large numbers of properties and/or classes. Using this profile the basic reasoning problems (ontology consistency and class expression subsumption) can be performed in time that is polynomial with respect to the size of the ontology. The EL acronym reflects the profile's basis in the EL family of description logics [EL++], logics that provide only Existential quantification. OWL2 QL is aimed at applications that use very large volumes of instance data, and where query answering is the most important reasoning task. Using a suitable reasoning technique, sound and complete conjunctive query answering can be performed in LOGSPACE with respect to the size of the data (assertions). The QL acronym reflects the fact that query answering in this profile can be implemented by rewriting queries into a standard relational Query Language. OWL2 RL is aimed at applications that require scalable reasoning without sacrificing too much expressive power. OWL2 RL reasoning systems can be implemented using rule-based reasoning engines. The ontology consistency, class expression satisfiability, class expression subsumption, instance checking, and conjunctive query answering problems can be solved in time that is polynomial with respect to the size of the ontology. The RL acronym reflects the fact that reasoning in this profile can be implemented using a standard Rule Language. 50
51 References SW201213/9OWL2.pdf Chapter 6 of the book 51
52 Any Question... 52
Web Ontology Language: OWL
Web Ontology Language: OWL Bojan Furlan A Semantic Web Primer, G. Antoniou, F. van Harmelen Requirements for Ontology Languages Ontology languages allow users to write explicit, formal conceptualizations
More informationShort notes about OWL 1
University of Rome Tor Vergata Short notes about OWL 1 Manuel Fiorelli fiorelli@info.uniroma2.it [1] this presentation is limited to OWL 1 features. A new version of OWL (OWL 2), which adds further features
More informationSemantic Technologies
Semantic Technologies Part 14: Werner Nutt Acknowledgment These slides are based on the Latex version of slides by Markus Krötzsch of TU Dresden W. Nutt Semantic Technologies 2014/2015 (1/66) OWL W. Nutt
More informationKDI OWL. Fausto Giunchiglia and Mattia Fumagallli. University of Trento
KDI OWL Fausto Giunchiglia and Mattia Fumagallli University of Trento Roadmap Introduction The OWL Full Language OWL DL and OWL lite Exercises 2 Introduction Chapter 1 3 Requirements for Ontology Languages
More informationTable of Contents. iii
Current Web 1 1.1 Current Web History 1 1.2 Current Web Characteristics 2 1.2.1 Current Web Features 2 1.2.2 Current Web Benefits 3 1.2.3. Current Web Applications 3 1.3 Why the Current Web is not Enough
More informationChapter 2 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE OWL WEB ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE 1. INTRODUCTION. Jeff Heflin Lehigh University
Chapter 2 AN INTRODUCTION TO THE OWL WEB ONTOLOGY LANGUAGE Jeff Heflin Lehigh University Abstract: Key words: 1. INTRODUCTION The OWL Web Ontology Language is an international standard for encoding and
More informationFOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES
FOUNDATIONS OF SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGIES OWL Syntax & Intuition Sebastian Rudolph Dresden, 26 April 2013 Content Overview & XML 9 APR DS2 Hypertableau II 7 JUN DS5 Introduction into RDF 9 APR DS3 Tutorial
More informationReasoning with the Web Ontology Language (OWL)
Reasoning with the Web Ontology Language (OWL) JESSE WEAVER, PH.D. Fundamental & Computational Sciences Directorate, Senior Research Computer Scientist Discovery 2020 Short Course on Semantic Data Analysis
More informationDEVELOPING AN OWL ONTOLOGY FOR E- TOURISM
Chapter 4 DEVELOPING AN OWL ONTOLOGY FOR E- TOURISM Jorge Cardoso Department of Mathematics and Engineering, University of Madeira, 9000-390, Funchal, Portugal jcardoso@uma.pt 1. INTRODUCTION Currently,
More informationSemantic Web in Depth: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Dr Nicholas Gibbins 32/3019
Semantic Web in Depth: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Dr Nicholas Gibbins 32/3019 nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk Introducing OWL For many, RDF Schema is a sufficiently expressive ontology language However, there are
More informationMain topics: Presenter: Introduction to OWL Protégé, an ontology editor OWL 2 Semantic reasoner Summary TDT OWL
1 TDT4215 Web Intelligence Main topics: Introduction to Web Ontology Language (OWL) Presenter: Stein L. Tomassen 2 Outline Introduction to OWL Protégé, an ontology editor OWL 2 Semantic reasoner Summary
More informationSemantic Web Technologies: Web Ontology Language
Semantic Web Technologies: Web Ontology Language Motivation OWL Formal Semantic OWL Synopsis OWL Programming Introduction XML / XML Schema provides a portable framework for defining a syntax RDF forms
More informationWeb Ontology Language: OWL
Web Ontology Language: OWL Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen 1 Lecture Outline 1. Basic Ideas of OWL 2. The OWL Language 3. Examples 4. The OWL Namespace 5. Future Extensions 2 Requirements for Ontology
More informationCC LA WEB DE DATOS PRIMAVERA Lecture 4: Web Ontology Language (I) Aidan Hogan
CC6202-1 LA WEB DE DATOS PRIMAVERA 2015 Lecture 4: Web Ontology Language (I) Aidan Hogan aidhog@gmail.com PREVIOUSLY ON LA WEB DE DATOS (1) Data, (2) Rules/Ontologies, (3) Query, RDF: Resource Description
More informationDescription Logic. Eva Mráková,
Description Logic Eva Mráková, glum@fi.muni.cz Motivation: ontology individuals/objects/instances ElizabethII Philip Philip, Anne constants in FOPL concepts/classes/types Charles Anne Andrew Edward Male,
More informationThe Semantic Web RDF, RDF Schema, and OWL (Part 2)
The Semantic Web RDF, RDF Schema, and OWL (Part 2) Mitchell W. Smith Array BioPharma, Inc. msmith@arraybiopharma.com Page Agenda Part One: RDF RDF/XML Syntax RDF Schema SPARQL Part Two: OWL Ontologies
More informationWeb Ontology Language: OWL
Web Ontology Language: OWL 1 Requirements for Ontology Languages Ontology languages allow users to write explicit, formal conceptualizations of domain models The main requirements are: a well-defined syntax
More informationWeb Ontology Language: OWL by Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen
Web Ontology Language: OWL by Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen Reference: `A Semantic Web Primer, by Grigoris Antoniou and Frank van Harmelen, The MIT Press, 2004 Lecture Outline 1. Basic Ideas of
More informationForward Chaining Reasoning Tool for Rya
Forward Chaining Reasoning Tool for Rya Rya Working Group, 6/29/2016 Forward Chaining Reasoning Tool for Rya 6/29/2016 1 / 11 OWL Reasoning OWL (the Web Ontology Language) facilitates rich ontology definition
More informationChapter 4 Web Ontology Language: OWL
Web Ontology Language: OWL Grigoris Antoniou Frank van Harmelen 1 Lecture Outline 1. Basic Ideas of OWL 2. The OWL Language 3. Examples 4. The OWL Namespace 5. Future Extensions 2 Requirements for Ontology
More informationOWL a glimpse. OWL a glimpse (2) requirements for ontology languages. requirements for ontology languages
OWL a glimpse OWL Web Ontology Language describes classes, properties and relations among conceptual objects lecture 7: owl - introduction of#27# ece#720,#winter# 12# 2# of#27# OWL a glimpse (2) requirements
More informationOntologies and OWL. Riccardo Rosati. Knowledge Representation and Semantic Technologies
Knowledge Representation and Semantic Technologies Ontologies and OWL Riccardo Rosati Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Informatica Sapienza Università di Roma 2016/2017 The Semantic Web Tower Ontologies
More informationKnowledge management. OWL Web Ontology Language
Knowledge management. OWL Web Ontology Language 1 RDF/RDFS RDF: triples for making assertions about resources RDFS extends RDF with schema vocabulary, e.g.: Class, Property type, subclassof, subpropertyof
More informationWhy Ontologies? RRDIU - Semantic Web 2
Ontologies OWL2 Why Ontologies? 2019-01-21 01RRDIU - Semantic Web 2 Semantics Knowledge Organizazion Systems Term Lists Authority files Glossaries Dictionaries, Vocabularies Gazetteers Classifications
More informationOWL Web Ontology Language
Mustafa Jarrar Lecture Notes, Knowledge Engineering (SCOM7348) University of Birzeit 1 st Semester, 2011 Knowledge Engineering (SCOM7348) OWL Web Ontology Language Dr. Mustafa Jarrar University of Birzeit
More informationKnowledge management. OWL Web Ontology Language
RDF/RDFS Knowledge management. OWL Web Ontology Language RDF: triples for making assertions about resources RDFS extends RDF with schema vocabulary, e.g.: Class, Property type, subclassof, subpropertyof
More informationSemantic Web Test
Semantic Web Test 24.01.2017 Group 1 No. A B C D 1 X X X 2 X X 3 X X 4 X X 5 X X 6 X X X X 7 X X 8 X X 9 X X X 10 X X X 11 X 12 X X X 13 X X 14 X X 15 X X 16 X X 17 X 18 X X 19 X 20 X X 1. Which statements
More informationContents. G52IWS: The Semantic Web. The Semantic Web. Semantic web elements. Semantic Web technologies. Semantic Web Services
Contents G52IWS: The Semantic Web Chris Greenhalgh 2007-11-10 Introduction to the Semantic Web Semantic Web technologies Overview RDF OWL Semantic Web Services Concluding comments 1 See Developing Semantic
More informationDeep integration of Python with Semantic Web technologies
Deep integration of Python with Semantic Web technologies Marian Babik, Ladislav Hluchy Intelligent and Knowledge Technologies Group Institute of Informatics, SAS Goals of the presentation Brief introduction
More information08 OWL SEMANTIC WEB ONTOLOGY WEB LANGUAGE IMRAN IHSAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, AIR UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD
SEMANTIC WEB 08 OWL ONTOLOGY WEB LANGUAGE IMRAN IHSAN ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, AIR UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD WWW.IMRANIHSAN.COM BASED ON SLIDES FROM GRIGORIS ANTONIOU AND FRANK VAN HARMELEN THE OWL FAMILY TREE
More informationLecture 8 OWL: Web Ontology Language
info-h-509 xml technologies Lecture 8 OWL: Web Ontology Language Stijn Vansummeren February 14, 2017 lecture outline 1 Our story so far 2 Web Ontology Language OWL 3 Reasoning with OWL 1 Part I: Our story
More informationChapter 4 OWL. Outline. A Brief History of OWL: SHOE. The OWL Family Tree
Chapter 4 OWL Outline 1. A bit of history 2. Basic Ideas of OWL 3. The OWL Language 4. Examples 5. The OWL Namespace 6. Future Extensions Based on slides from Grigoris Antoniou and Frank van Harmelen The
More informationIntroduction to OWL. Marco Ronchetti Università di Trento Italy
Introduction to OWL Marco Ronchetti Università di Trento Italy Languages Work on Semantic Web has concentrated on the definition of a collection or stack of languages.! These languages are then used to
More informationH1 Spring B. Programmers need to learn the SOAP schema so as to offer and use Web services.
1. (24 points) Identify all of the following statements that are true about the basics of services. A. If you know that two parties implement SOAP, then you can safely conclude they will interoperate at
More informationOWL-based reasoning with retractable inference
OWL-based reasoning with retractable inference Carlo Jelmini and Stéphane Marchand-Maillet Viper Group CVML University of Geneva 1211 Geneva 4 Switzerland {jelmini, marchand}@cui.unige.ch Abstract As a
More informationOWL and tractability. Based on slides from Ian Horrocks and Franz Baader. Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester
OWL and tractability Based on slides from Ian Horrocks and Franz Baader Where are we? OWL Reasoning DL Extensions Scalability OWL OWL in practice PL/FOL XML RDF(S)/SPARQL Practical Topics Repetition: DL
More informationTMCL and OWL. Lars Marius Garshol. Bouvet, Oslo, Norway
TMCL and OWL Lars Marius Garshol Bouvet, Oslo, Norway larsga@bouvet.no Abstract. This paper compares the Topic Maps schema language TMCL with the corresponding RDF technologies RDFS/OWL, and describes
More informationThe Semantic Web. Mansooreh Jalalyazdi
1 هو العليم 2 The Semantic Web Mansooreh Jalalyazdi 3 Content Syntactic web XML Add semantics Representation Language RDF, RDFS OWL Query languages 4 History of the Semantic Web Tim Berners-Lee vision
More informationBryan Smith May 2010
Bryan Smith May 2010 Tool (Onto2SMem) to generate declarative knowledge base in SMem from ontology Sound (if incomplete) inference Proof of concept Baseline implementation Semantic memory (SMem) Store
More informationIntelligent Agents. Pınar Yolum Utrecht University. Spring 2018 Pınar Yolum
Intelligent Agents Pınar Yolum p.yolum@uu.nl Utrecht University Spring 2018 Pınar Yolum Web Ontology Language Spring 2018 Pınar Yolum Based largely on Dean Allemang; James Hendler, Semantic Web for the
More informationLINKING BACKGROUND INFORMATION
LINKING BACKGROUND INFORMATION INTERLINK D4 Appendix 4, Michel Böhms (TNO) With input from EU V-CON and bsi LDWG OVERVIEW Basic Linking More Background Info on L1/L2/L3 semantic levels Advanced Linking
More informationThe ISO D approach
The ISO 15926 4D approach David Leal, 2016-11-14 With examples of the use of OWL DL inferencing Contents 1. Use of 4D Approach to a stream, as in engineering analysis Instantiation to support inferencing
More informationTeil IV: Wissensrepräsentation im WWW. Kap.11: Semantic Web
Vorlesung Künstliche Intelligenz Wintersemester 2007/08 Teil IV: Wissensrepräsentation im WWW Kap.11: Semantic Web Dieses Kapitel basiert weitgehend auf Material von Pascal Hitzler. Weitere Infos gibt
More informationQuerying Data through Ontologies
Querying Data through Ontologies Instructor: Sebastian Link Thanks to Serge Abiteboul, Ioana Manolescu, Philippe Rigaux, Marie-Christine Rousset and Pierre Senellart Web Data Management and Distribution
More informationSemantic Web Technologies Web Ontology Language (OWL) Part II. Heiko Paulheim
Semantic Web Technologies Web Ontology Language (OWL) Part II Previously on Semantic Web Technologies We have got to know OWL, a more powerful ontology language than RDFS Simple ontologies and some reasoning
More informationOntologies, OWL, OWL profiles
Knowledge Representation and Semantic Technologies Ontologies, OWL, OWL profiles Riccardo Rosati Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Informatica Sapienza Università di Roma 2013/2014 The Semantic
More informationChapter 4 OWL. Outline. The OWL Family Tree. A Brief History of OWL: SHOE
Chapter 4 OWL Outline 1. A bit of history 2. Basic Ideas of OWL 3. The OWL Language 4. Examples 5. The OWL Namespace 6. OWL 2 Based on slides from Grigoris Antoniou and Frank van Harmelen The OWL Family
More informationJOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY
JOURNAL OF OBJECT TECHNOLOGY Online at http://www.jot.fm. Published by ETH Zurich, Chair of Software Engineering JOT, 2005 Vol. 4, No. 1, January-February 2005 Ontology Modeling and MDA Dragan Djurić,
More informationTeil IV: Wissensrepräsentation im WWW. Kap.11: Semantic Web. The semantic web layer cake
The semantic web layer cake Vorlesung Künstliche Intelligenz Wintersemester 2007/08 Teil IV: Wissensrepräsentation im WWW Kap.11: Semantic Web Dieses Kapitel basiert weitgehend auf Material von Pascal
More informationSemantic Web Ontologies
Semantic Web Ontologies CS 431 April 4, 2005 Carl Lagoze Cornell University Acknowledgements: Alun Preece RDF Schemas Declaration of vocabularies classes, properties, and structures defined by a particular
More informationGenea: Schema-Aware Mapping of Ontologies into Relational Databases
Genea: Schema-Aware Mapping of Ontologies into Relational Databases Tim Kraska Uwe Röhm University of Sydney School of Information Technologies Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia mail@tim-kraska.de roehm@it.usyd.edu.au
More informationJorge Cardoso University of Coimbra, Portugal & KSRI/Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Jorge Cardoso University of Coimbra, Portugal & KSRI/Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany Alexandre Miguel Pinto University of Coimbra, Portugal Initially, the WWW was primarily composed of documents
More informationSemantic Web KM: A Knowledge Machine for Semantic Webs
SIG-SWO-044-07 KM Semantic Web KM: A Knowledge Machine for Semantic Webs 1,2 1,3 Seiji Koide 1,2 Hideaki Takeda 1,3 1 1 National Institute of Informatics 2 2 Ontolonomy, LLC 3 3 SOKENDAI Univ. (The Graduate
More information12th ICCRTS. On the Automated Generation of an OWL Ontology based on the Joint C3 Information Exchange Data Model (JC3IEDM)
12th ICCRTS On the Automated Generation of an OWL Ontology based on the Joint C3 Information Exchange Data Model (JC3IEDM) Christopher J. Matheus and Brian Ulicny VIStology, Inc. Framingham, MA, U.S.A.
More informationSemantic Web. Part 3 The ontology layer 1: Ontologies, Description Logics, and OWL
Semantic Web Part 3 The ontology layer 1: Ontologies, Description Logics, and OWL Riccardo Rosati Corso di Laurea Magistrale in Ingegneria Informatica Sapienza Università di Roma 2012/2013 REMARK Most
More informationOWL 2 Profiles. An Introduction to Lightweight Ontology Languages. Markus Krötzsch University of Oxford. Reasoning Web 2012
University of Oxford Department of Computer Science OWL 2 Profiles An Introduction to Lightweight Ontology Languages Markus Krötzsch University of Oxford Reasoning Web 2012 Remark for the Online Version
More informationBeliefOWL An Evidential Extension to OWL
Université de Tunis Institut Supérieur de Gestion de Tunis Laboratoire de recherche LARODEC Mémoire présenté en vue de l obtention du Diplôme de Mastère en Informatique Appliquée à la Gestion BeliefOWL
More informationDefining Several Ontologies to Enhance the Expressive Power of Queries
Defining everal Ontologies to Enhance the Expressive Power of Queries Bich-Liên Doan and Yolaine Bourda Computer cience Dpt. UPELEC, 3 rue Joliot Curie, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France Bich-Lien.Doan@supelec.fr,
More informationDescribing Ontology Relationships
Describing Ontology Relationships A brief guide to the expressive powers of ISO Common Logic Pat Hayes, Florida IHMC phayes@ihmc.us 1 ISO Common Logic The recently published ISO Common Logic standard provides
More informationChapter 3 Research Method
Chapter 3 Research Method 3.1 A Ontology-Based Method As we mention in section 2.3.6, we need a common approach to build up our ontologies for different B2B standards. In this chapter, we present a ontology-based
More informationRDF Schema. Mario Arrigoni Neri
RDF Schema Mario Arrigoni Neri Semantic heterogeneity Standardization: commitment on common shared markup If no existing application If market-leaders can define de-facto standards Translation: create
More informationARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI. Department of Computer Science. Technical Report
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI Department of Computer Science Technical Report Populating Object-Oriented Rule Engines with the Extensional Knowledge of OWL DL Reasoners Georgios Meditskos and Nick
More informationOWL 2 Update. Christine Golbreich
OWL 2 Update Christine Golbreich 1 OWL 2 W3C OWL working group is developing OWL 2 see http://www.w3.org/2007/owl/wiki/ Extends OWL with a small but useful set of features Fully backwards
More informationOWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer W3C Recommendation 27 October 2009
OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer W3C Recommendation 27 October 2009 This version: Latest version (series 2: http://www.w3.org/tr/owl2-primer/ Latest Recommendation: http://www.w3.org/tr/owl-primer Previous
More informationOntological Modeling: Part 7
Ontological Modeling: Part 7 Terry Halpin LogicBlox and INTI International University This is the seventh in a series of articles on ontology-based approaches to modeling. The main focus is on popular
More informationMetamodels for RDF Schema and OWL
Metamodels for RDF Schema and OWL Daniel T. Chang Elisa Kendall IBM Silicon Valley Lab Sandpiper Software, Inc. 555 Bailey Ave., San Jose, CA 95141 2053 Grant Road, #162, Los Altos, CA 94024 dtchang@us.ibm.com
More informationIntroduction to Protégé. Federico Chesani, 18 Febbraio 2010
Introduction to Protégé Federico Chesani, 18 Febbraio 2010 Ontologies An ontology is a formal, explicit description of a domain of interest Allows to specify: Classes (domain concepts) Semantci relation
More informationKnowledge Representation for the Semantic Web Lecture 4: Description Logics III
Knowledge Representation for the Semantic Web Lecture 4: Description Logics III Daria Stepanova slides based on Reasoning Web 2011 tutorial Foundations of by S. Rudolph Max Planck Institute for Informatics
More informationAn Introduction to the Semantic Web. Jeff Heflin Lehigh University
An Introduction to the Semantic Web Jeff Heflin Lehigh University The Semantic Web Definition The Semantic Web is not a separate Web but an extension of the current one, in which information is given well-defined
More informationOWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer
OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer W3C Working Draft 21 April 2009 This version: Latest version: http://www.w3.org/tr/owl2-primer/ Previous version: http://www.w3.org/tr/2008/wd-owl2-primer-20080411/ Authors:
More informationINF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2017
INF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2017 Lecture 10: OWL, the Web Ontology Language Leif Harald Karlsen 20th March 2017 Department of Informatics University of Oslo Reminders Oblig. 5: First deadline
More informationWeb Data and Declarative Programming
and Declarative Programming Universidad de Almería. jalmen@ual.es March 2, 2010 Table of contents 1 2 XML RDF OWL 3 Querying and Reasoning with SPARQL 4 with 5 Querying and Reasoning with Research Lines
More informationINF3580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2012
INF3580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2012 Lecture 10: OWL, the Web Ontology Language Martin G. Skjæveland 20th March 2012 Department of Informatics University of Oslo Outline Reminder: RDFS 1 Reminder:
More informationOWL Full and UML 2.0 Compared
OWL Full and UML 2.0 Compared This document is intended to establish the relationship between the relevant features of UML 2.0 and OWL as part of the development of the Ontology Definition Metamodel (ODM).
More informationEfficient Querying of Web Services Using Ontologies
Journal of Algorithms & Computational Technology Vol. 4 No. 4 575 Efficient Querying of Web Services Using Ontologies K. Saravanan, S. Kripeshwari and Arunkumar Thangavelu School of Computing Sciences,
More informationOWL 2 Profiles. An Introduction to Lightweight Ontology Languages. Маркус Крёч (Markus Krötzsch) University of Oxford. KESW Summer School 2012
University of Oxford Department of Computer Science OWL 2 Profiles An Introduction to Lightweight Ontology Languages Маркус Крёч (Markus Krötzsch) University of Oxford KESW Summer School 2012 Remark for
More informationAdding formal semantics to the Web
Adding formal semantics to the Web building on top of RDF Schema Jeen Broekstra On-To-Knowledge project Context On-To-Knowledge IST project about content-driven knowledge management through evolving ontologies
More informationSemantic Web. RDF and RDF Schema. Morteza Amini. Sharif University of Technology Spring 90-91
بسمه تعالی Semantic Web RDF and RDF Schema Morteza Amini Sharif University of Technology Spring 90-91 Outline Metadata RDF RDFS RDF(S) Tools 2 Semantic Web: Problems (1) Too much Web information around
More informationXML and Semantic Web Technologies. III. Semantic Web / 2. Web Ontology Language (OWL)
XML and Semantic Web Technologies XML and Semantic Web Technologies. Semantic Web / 2. Web Ontology Language (OWL) Lars Schmidt-Thieme nformation Systems and Machine Learning Lab (SMLL) nstitute of Economics
More informationIntroduction to Ontologies
Introduction to Ontologies Jon Atle Gulla Ontology (from the Greek nominative ὤν: being, genitive ὄντος: of being (participle of εἶναι: to be) and -λογία: science, study, theory) is a study of conceptions
More informationSemantic Web. MPRI : Web Data Management. Antoine Amarilli Friday, January 11th 1/29
Semantic Web MPRI 2.26.2: Web Data Management Antoine Amarilli Friday, January 11th 1/29 Motivation Information on the Web is not structured 2/29 Motivation Information on the Web is not structured This
More informationSemantic Web. Ontology Engineering and Evaluation. Morteza Amini. Sharif University of Technology Fall 95-96
ه عا ی Semantic Web Ontology Engineering and Evaluation Morteza Amini Sharif University of Technology Fall 95-96 Outline Ontology Engineering Class and Class Hierarchy Ontology Evaluation 2 Outline Ontology
More informationOWL 2 The Next Generation. Ian Horrocks Information Systems Group Oxford University Computing Laboratory
OWL 2 The Next Generation Ian Horrocks Information Systems Group Oxford University Computing Laboratory What is an Ontology? What is an Ontology? A model of (some aspect
More informationMandatory exercises. INF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2017 Lecture 12: OWL: Loose Ends. Outline. Make it simple!
Mandatory exercises INF3580/4580 Semantic Technologies Spring 2017 Lecture 12: OWL: Loose Ends Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz 3rd April 2017 Oblig 6 published after lecture. First attempt by April 25th. Second attempt
More informationA Framework for OWL DL based Ontology Construction from Relational Database using Mapping and Semantic Rules
A Framework for OWL DL based Construction from Relational Database using Mapping and Semantic Rules C.Ramathilagam Assistant Professor Adithya Institute of Technology Coimbatore, TamilNadu, India M.L.Valarmathi,
More informationA Heuristic Approach to Explain the Inconsistency in OWL Ontologies Hai Wang, Matthew Horridge, Alan Rector, Nick Drummond, Julian Seidenberg
A Heuristic Approach to Explain the Inconsistency in OWL Ontologies Hai Wang, Matthew Horridge, Alan Rector, Nick Drummond, Julian Seidenberg 1 Introduction OWL IS COMING!! Debugging OWL is very difficult
More informationSemantic Web In Depth: Resource Description Framework. Dr Nicholas Gibbins 32/4037
Semantic Web In Depth: Resource Description Framework Dr Nicholas Gibbins 32/4037 nmg@ecs.soton.ac.uk RDF syntax(es) RDF/XML is the standard syntax Supported by almost all tools RDF/N3 (Notation3) is also
More informationSemantic Web. Ontology Engineering and Evaluation. Morteza Amini. Sharif University of Technology Fall 93-94
ه عا ی Semantic Web Ontology Engineering and Evaluation Morteza Amini Sharif University of Technology Fall 93-94 Outline Ontology Engineering Class and Class Hierarchy Ontology Evaluation 2 Outline Ontology
More informationMaking BioPAX SPARQL
Making BioPAX SPARQL hands on... start a terminal create a directory jena_workspace, move into that directory download jena.jar (http://tinyurl.com/3vlp7rw) download biopax data (http://www.biopax.org/junk/homosapiens.nt
More informationThe Semantic Web. INF5100 Autumn 2007 Norun C. Sanderson
The Semantic Web INF5100 Autumn 2007 Norun C. Sanderson Outline TheSemanticWeb visionand purpose Technology building blocks Application areas Future INF5100 Autumn 2007 2 What is the Semantic Web? The
More informationOntological Modeling: Part 8
Ontological Modeling: Part 8 Terry Halpin LogicBlox and INTI International University This is the eighth in a series of articles on ontology-based approaches to modeling. The main focus is on popular ontology
More informationOntological Modeling: Part 2
Ontological Modeling: Part 2 Terry Halpin LogicBlox This is the second in a series of articles on ontology-based approaches to modeling. The main focus is on popular ontology languages proposed for the
More informationLinked data basic notions!
Linked data basic notions see http://linkeddatabook.com/editions/1.0/ RDF RDF stands for Resource Description Framework It is a W3C Recommendation ü http://www.w3.org/rdf RDF is a graphical formalism (
More informationROWLBAC Representing Role Based Access Control in OWL
T. Finin A. Joshi J. Niu R. Sandhu W. Winsborough B. Thuraisingham a presentation by Jeremy Clark ROWLBAC Representing Role Based Access Control in OWL Introduction This paper examines the relationship
More informationA FRAMEWORK FOR DIRECT AND SEMANTICS BASED TRANSFORMATION FROM RELATIONAL DATABASE TO ONTOLOGY
A FRAMEWORK FOR DIRECT AND SEMANTICS BASED TRANSFORMATION FROM RELATIONAL DATABASE TO ONTOLOGY 1 C.RAMATHILAGAM, 2 Dr.M.L.VALARMATHI 1 Asstt Prof, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Adithya
More informationDeveloping markup metaschemas to support interoperation among resources with different markup schemas
Developing markup metaschemas to support interoperation among resources with different markup schemas Gary Simons SIL International ACH/ALLC Joint Conference 29 May to 2 June 2003, Athens, GA The Context
More informationFor return on 19 January 2018 (late submission: 2 February 2018)
Semantic Technologies Autumn 2017 Coursework For return on 19 January 2018 (late submission: 2 February 2018) Electronic submission:.pdf and.owl files only 1. (6%) Consider the following XML document:
More informationl A family of logic based KR formalisms l Distinguished by: l Decidable fragments of FOL l Closely related to Propositional Modal & Dynamic Logics
What Are Description Logics? Description Logics l A family of logic based KR formalisms Descendants of semantic networks and KL-ONE Describe domain in terms of concepts (classes), roles (relationships)
More informationEasing the Definition of N Ary Relations for Supporting Spatio Temporal Models in OWL
Easing the Definition of N Ary Relations for Supporting Spatio Temporal Models in OWL Alberto G. Salguero, Cecilia Delgado, and Francisco Araque Dpt. of Computer Languages and Systems University of Granada,
More informationOntological Modeling: Part 11
Ontological Modeling: Part 11 Terry Halpin LogicBlox and INTI International University This is the eleventh in a series of articles on ontology-based approaches to modeling. The main focus is on popular
More information