DEC OF MCNALLY ISO AMERANTH S OPPO TO DEFS MOTION TO 11-cv DMS (WVG)
|
|
- Justina George
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document - Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 CALDARELLI HEJMANOWSKI & PAGE LLP William J. Caldarelli (SBN #) Ben West (SBN #0) 0 El Camino Real, Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () 0-00 Facsimile: () 0-0 wjc@chplawfirm.com dbw@chplawfirm.com FABIANO LAW FIRM, P.C. Michael D. Fabiano (SBN #0) High Bluff Drive, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () - mdfabiano@fabianolawfirm.com OSBORNE LAW LLC John W. Osborne (Appointed Pro Hac Vice) Habitat Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 0 Telephone: () - josborne@osborneipl.com WATTS LAW OFFICES Ethan M. Watts (SBN #) 0 El Camino Real, Suite 0 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () 0-00 Facsimile: () - emw@ewattslaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Ameranth, Inc. -cv-00 DMS (WVG)
2 Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document - Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 IN RE: AMERANTH PATENT LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS. cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv00 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) DECLARATION OF KEITH MCNALLY IN SUPPORT OF AMERANTH, INC. S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO Date: December, 0 Time: :0 p.m. Location: Courtroom A Judge: Hon. Dana M. Sabraw Complaint Filed: August, 0 -cv-00 DMS (WVG)
3 Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document - Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 I, Keith McNally, declare as follows:. I am over years of age and competent to testify. I am the President of Ameranth, Inc. ( Ameranth ), the plaintiff in this action, and am one of its original founders. I am also the lead inventor of the four patents-in-suit owned by Ameranth and asserted in the consolidated lawsuits pending before this Court. I was involved with the prosecution of the patents in the USPTO. On these bases, I have first-hand personal knowledge of the facts contained in this declaration, and if called upon to testify I would and could do so competently as set forth herein. I provide this declaration in support of Ameranth s Opposition to the Defendants Motion to Stay.. Ameranth is a small but innovative software development company founded in California in. Ameranth s founders identified needs and challenges existing in the hospitality industry, and invented breakthrough technology to solve the underlying problems required to meet those needs.. Some of the problems, challenges, and needs that Ameranth s founders perceived, and for which they invented novel technological solutions, are described in Section A of Ameranth s Opposition to the Defendants Motion to Stay, filed herewith.. Ameranth conceived, invented, produced and deployed five core products for use in the hospitality industry (in addition to a Poker Room Manager system). Attached as Exhibit to the Notice of Lodgment filed herewith is an excerpt from an exemplary Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions which accurately lists, in section G, five of Ameranth s hospitality industry products that Ameranth invented, developed and widely deployed. Red Lobster, Seasons, Medieval Times, The Cheesecake Factory restaurants and others adopted Ameranth s technology systems for their operations. Ameranth s -cv-00 DMS (WVG)
4 Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document - Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 technology was also deployed at numerous entertainment venues, including Madison Square Garden, Staples Center, Lambeau Field, and Improv and Funny Bones comedy clubs throughout the country. Holiday Inn likewise adopted and deployed Ameranth s technology throughout its hotels nationwide. Zagat adopted Ameranth s Magellan restaurant reservations product, which at its peak it was operational in more than 000 dining establishments before being largely displaced by OpenTable and others.. Ameranth s award winning hospitality products were deployed in thousands of restaurants, hotels, casino, clubs and stadiums (as described in greater detail in the CFR. Declarations discussed below and lodged with the Court), until infringing products introduced by entities such as OpenTable and many of the other defendants herein largely displaced them from the hospitality market.. Ameranth had direct discussions with and demonstrated its products and technology to many of the defendants in this matter, including Domino s, Pizza Hut, QuikOrder, Papa John s, Starbucks, Agilysys, Marriott and Micros, which subsequently rolled out infringing products after disclosure of Ameranth s products to them (Agilysys was, until some point in 0, a licensee of Ameranth). Attached as Exhibit to the Notice of Lodgment filed herewith is a true and correct copy of a September 00 press release from Domino s calling its mobile ordering product, (which copied and infringed upon aspects of Ameranth s patented invention), its own breakthrough technology.. Ameranth properly and timely applied for patents for its inventions with the USPTO, resulting in the eventual issuance of the four patents in suit (Ameranth s 0,, and 0 patents). The patents describe software -cv-00 DMS (WVG)
5 Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document - Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 systems for performance of certain novel hospitality functions which are necessarily performed with computerized components.. Attached as Exhibit to the Notice of Lodgment filed herewith is a true and correct copy of a declaration, signed by me on August, 00, and submitted to the USPTO pursuant to CFR., accurately describing many of the secondary factors demonstrating the innovative and novel nature of Ameranth s inventions and products.. Attached as Exhibit to the Notice of Lodgment filed herewith is a true and correct copy of a supplemental declaration, signed by me on May 0, 00, and submitted to the USPTO pursuant to CFR., accurately describing several additional secondary factors demonstrating the innovative and novel nature of Ameranth s inventions and products. 0. Attached as Exhibit to the Notice of Lodgment filed herewith is a true and correct copy of a supplemental nexus declaration, signed by me on December, 00, and submitted to the USPTO pursuant to CFR., accurately explaining the nexus between the secondary factors and the patented inventions.. Attached as Exhibit to the Notice of Lodgment filed herewith is a true and correct copy of a supplemental declaration, signed by me on December,, 00, and submitted to the USPTO pursuant to CFR., accurately describing several additional secondary factors demonstrating the innovative and novel nature of Ameranth s inventions and further explaining the nexus between secondary factors and the patented inventions.. Attached as Exhibit to the Notice of Lodgment filed herewith are true and correct copies of exemplary press releases issued by Ameranth and two of -cv-00 DMS (WVG)
6 Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document - Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 its existing licensees Snapfinger, Inc. and PAR Technology Corporation attesting to the novel and visionary nature of Ameranth s patented inventions.. Attached as Exhibit to the Notice of Lodgment filed herewith is a true and correct copy of an Ameranth press release regarding Ameranth s strategic partnership with Zagat to provide a restaurant reservation service through Ameranth s Magellan system.. Ameranth currently has licensees, all of whom compete directly with one or more of the defendants herein. The defendants continued infringement of Ameranth s patents adversely affects Ameranth s licensees business, Ameranth s income from such licenses, and Ameranth s licensing efforts and ability to obtain further licensees and licensing income within the remaining term of the patents. In fact, recently one of the defendants, OWeb, displaced an Ameranth licensee in Outback Steakhouses, thereby directly and adversely impacting the revenue both of our licensee and of Ameranth itself, since Ameranth s licenses generally provide for running royalties based upon processed transactions. An expanded stay of the litigation, which would allow defendants to continue infringing Ameranth s patents without consequence, would further harm Ameranth and its many licensees. Moreover, a stay would harm Ameranth by prolonging and increasing the expense of litigation, by allowing witnesses memories to fade and relevant evidence to become stale and harder to find in discovery, and would result in loss of some of the remaining term of the patents in suit (the oldest of which may expire in 0).. Furthermore, the technology involved in the litigation mobile/ web systems and products evolves rapidly. New versions of products are often released twice a year. Ameranth has invested substantial sums of money in discovery, source code and technical document review, and detailed analysis of the -cv-00 DMS (WVG)
7 Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document - Filed /0/ Page of 0 source code and technical implementations of the recent versions of the infringing products and systems in connection with this litigation. A further stay of the litigation may render such products and analysis outdated as products continue to evolve, require further expensive and time consuming updating, and unfairly require Ameranth to conduct one of the most expensive aspects of a patent plaintiffs case preparation multiple times. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that this declaration was executed by me in San Diego, California, on November, 0. Keith McNally 0 -cv-00 DMS (WVG)
Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 4:17-cv-00863 Document 1 Filed 12/15/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DYNAMIC APPLET TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, v. Plaintiff, HAVERTY FURNITURE
More informationCase 1:08-cv JG-VVP Document 1083 Filed 06/27/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:08-cv-00042-JG-VVP Document 1083 Filed 06/27/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 15289 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PRECISION ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
1 1 1 1 1 1 ROBERT A. NAEVE (CA SBN 0) RNaeve@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 00 MacArthur Blvd. Irvine, California 1- Telephone: () 1-00 Facsimile: () 1-000 DAVID F. MCDOWELL (CA SBN 10) SARVENAZ BAHAR
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 [Attorney and firm information of filing party] MODEL FORMS Where this Order Form is used, then any proposed stipulated order submitted to the Court must be accompanied by a redlined or
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01268 Document 1 Filed 11/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SMART AUTHENTICATION IP, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-662
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TELINIT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12-cv-662 v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MICROSOFT CORPORATION; SKYPE
More informationCase 1:17-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/11/2017 Page 1 of 21
Case :-cv--fam Document Entered on FLSD Docket 0//0 Page of 0 0 Coleman Watson, Esq. Watson LLP S. Orange Avenue, Suite 0 Orlando, FL 0 coleman@watsonllp.com CODING TECHNOLGIES, LLC, vs. Plaintiff, MERCEDES-BENZ
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-05460 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Sharpe Innovations, Inc., Plaintiff,
More informationCase3:08-cv WHA Document237 Filed11/30/09 Page1 of 6
Case:0-cv-0-WHA Document Filed/0/0 Page of 0 0 K.A.D. CAMARA (TX Bar No. 0/ MA Bar No. 0 Admitted Pro Hac Vice) camara@camarasibley.com KENT RADFORD (TX Bar No. 00 Admitted Pro Hac Vice) radford@camarasibley.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
ANDREW Y. PIATNICIA (Bar No. 1) andy@piatnicialegal.com Piatnicia Legal Prospect Rd., No. San Jose, CA (0) 1- Attorney for Plaintiffs Asus Computer International ASUSTeK Computer Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00194 Document 1 Filed 05/09/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SEMCON IP INC., v. Plaintiff, TCT MOBILE INTERNATIONAL
More informationGOOGLE S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH PATENT RULE
Aloft Media, LLC v. Google, Inc. Doc. 52 Att. 2 GOOGLE S MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH PATENT RULE 3-1 Exhibit 1 Dockets.Justia.com ALOFT MEDIA, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN
More informationUNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. KYOCERA CORPORATION, and MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC Petitioners,
Kyocera PX 1052_1 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD KYOCERA CORPORATION, and MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC Petitioners, v. SOFTVIEW LLC, Patent Owner. SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:15-cv-01081 Document 1 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Plaintiff v. CIVIL
More informationCase 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:17-cv-01586-UNA Document 1 Filed 11/03/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PURE DATA SYSTEMS, LLC Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00276 Document 1 Filed 04/06/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNILOC 2017 LLC, Case No. v. Plaintiff, PATENT CASE BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, v. Plaintiff, TREEFROG DEVELOPMENTS INC. d/b/a LIFEPROOF, a
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC. AND ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
More informationCase 1:99-mc Document 341 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 341 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 33145 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BUYERLEVERAGE EMAIL SOLUTIONS LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
More informationCase 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00746-JRG Document 1 Filed 11/16/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 DANIEL JOHNSON, JR. (SBN 0) MICHAEL J. LYONS (SBN 0) AHREN C. HSU-HOFFMAN (SBN 0) COREY R. HOUMAND (SBN ) Palo Alto Square 000 El Camino Real, Suite 00 Palo Alto, California 0-1 Telephone:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Case: 3:10-cv-00243-slc Document #: 1 Filed: 05/04/2010 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SanDisk Corporation, vs. Plaintiff, Kingston Technology Co.,
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00851 Document 1 Filed 10/08/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION UNILOC 2017 LLC and UNILOC LICENSING USA, LLC, v. APPLE INC.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC., and Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-2118 UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A., Plaintiffs, v. PATENT CASE AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
Case 1:18-cv-00368-RLY-MPB Document 1 Filed 02/08/18 Page 1 of 33 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION BLUE SKY NETWORKS, LLC, Plaintiff
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation, v. Apple Inc., Plaintiffs, Defendant. Civil Action
More informationCase 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 2:14-cv-00182-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JOHN B. ADRAIN, Plaintiff, vs. HIKVISION
More informationCase: 5:10-cv SL Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/30/10 1 of 8. PageID #: 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 5:10-cv-01108-SL Doc #: 15 Filed: 09/30/10 1 of 8. PageID #: 93 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VIDEO PRODUCTS INC. 1275 Danner Drive Aurora, Ohio
More informationCase 1:18-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 07/01/18 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:18-cv-00982-UNA Document 1 Filed 07/01/18 Page 1 of 30 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE BECK BRANCH LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNIFY INC. DBA UNIFY ENTERPRISE
More informationCase 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1
Case 6:15-cv-01006 Document 1 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC., and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
More informationCase 1:12-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:12-cv-00473-SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., vs. Plaintiff, SIERRA WIRELESS,
More informationCase5:11-cv LHK Document1283 Filed07/23/12 Page1 of 14
Case:-cv-0-LHK Document Filed0// Page of 0 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. ) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 0 California Street, nd Floor San Francisco, California
More informationCase 5:15-cv EJD Document Filed 12/17/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 5:5-cv-0778-EJD Document 85-7 Filed 2/7/8 Page of 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 2 3 4 IN RE INTUIT DATA LITIGATION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS PANTECH CO., LTD., and PANTECH WIRELESS, INC.,
More informationCase 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 185 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 2095
Case 1:15-cv-00659-JMS-MJD Document 185 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 2095 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION ) UNITED STATES SECURITIES ) AND EXCHANGE
More informationAttorneys for Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc.
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al Doc. 480 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Jeffrey N. Mausner (State Bar No. 122385) Law Offices of Jeffrey N. Mausner Warner Center Towers 21800 Oxnard Street, Suite 910 Woodland
More informationCase 6:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1
Case 6:16-cv-00224 Document 1 Filed 03/18/16 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC., and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
More informationCase 1:99-mc Document 298 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 298 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 17417 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC., vs. Plaintiff, LG ELECTRONICS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT THE PARTIES
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNILOC 2017 LLC, Case No. v. Plaintiff, PATENT CASE BLACKBERRY CORPORATION, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT
More informationCase3:12-cv VC Document32 Filed02/11/15 Page1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Case:-cv-0-VC Document Filed0// Page of LLC, PHOENIX DIGITAL SOLUTIONS LLC, and PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BARNES & NOBLE, INC., SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
More informationCase 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00074 Document 1 Filed 03/13/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :0-cv-00-MRP -FFM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 Frank M. Weyer, Esq. (State Bar No. 0 TECHCOASTLAW 0 Whitley Ave. Los Angeles CA 00 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-0 fweyer@techcoastlaw.com
More informationAIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IC DISPLAY SYSTEMS LLC, AIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. ACER INC., and ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendants. COMPLAINT
More informationCase 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:17-cv-00752-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE KALDREN LLC Plaintiff, v. KIK US, INC. Defendant. C.A. No. JURY
More informationCase 3:18-cv G Document 1 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1
Case 3:18-cv-00561-G Document 1 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 7 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION PATENT CASE ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:16-cv-01314 Document 1 Filed 12/15/16 Page 1 of 27 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-01314 TYPEMOCK, LTD., v. TELERIK INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Plaintiff,
More informationCase 5:16-cm SP Document Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:2395
Case :-cm-0000-sp Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney PATRICIA A. DONAHUE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, National Security Division TRACY L. WILKISON
More informationCase 1:16-cv AJN Document 190 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:16-cv-08412-AJN Document 190 Filed 09/01/17 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MELISSA FERRICK, et al., Case No. 1:16-cv-08412 (AJN) Plaintiffs, vs. SPOTIFY
More informationInstructions: Request for Documents
Instructions: Request for Documents These forms were prepared by the Justice & Diversity Center, a nonprofit organization, and are not official court forms. Checklist This packet provides a general form
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OAKLAND DIVISION
Case:-cv-0-JSW Document Document Filed// Filed/0/ Page of Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) Craig R. Spiegel (SBN 00) th Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, WA Telephone: (0) - Email: steve@hbsslaw.com Email: craigs@hbsslaw.com
More informationCase 3:03-cv AVC Document 294 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 303-cv-00221-AVC Document 294 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT STATE EMPLOYEES BARGAINING AGENT COALITION, et al, PLAINTIFFS, V. NO. 303 CV 221 (AVC)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., v. Plaintiffs, CHIEF ARCHITECT, INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:14-cv-421
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00362
DATAMOTION TEXAS, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00362 ZIX CORPORATION, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant.
More informationAttorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs and Counter- Defendants
Realnetworks, Inc. et al v. DVD Copy Control Association, Inc. et al Doc. Case:0-cv-0-MHP Document Filed0/0/0 Page of 0 GLENN D. POMERANTZ (SBN 0) Glenn.Pomerantz@mto.com BART H. WILLIAMS (SBN 00) Bart.Williams@mto.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT
TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and ERICSSON INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Plaintiffs, CIVIL CASE NO. vs. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED WI-LAN USA, INC., WI-LAN INC. and NETWORK
More information18 Civ. 269 COMPLAINT. Complaint for patent infringement against Defendants FanDuel, Inc. and FanDuel Limited
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PERSONALWEB TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, and LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al Doc. 780 Case 2:04-cv-09484-AHM-SH Document 780 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jeffrey N. Mausner
More informationCase 1:18-cv LY Document 22 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00309-LY Document 22 Filed 07/19/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION MEETRIX IP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.
More informationCase 1:17-cv PBS Document 12 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:17-cv-11642-PBS Document 12 Filed 02/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ALTOVA GMBH and ALTOVA INC., Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-11642-PBS Plaintiffs,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS HUAWEI INVESTMENT & HOLDING CO., LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES
More informationCase 5:18-cv LHK Document 55 Filed 12/06/18 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-00-lhk Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 Aaron S. Jacobs (CA No. ajacobs@princelobel.com One International Place, Suite 00 Boston, MA 00 --000 Matthew D. Vella (CA No. mvella@princelobel.com 0 Broadway
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-gw-jc Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT Marc A. Fenster, SBN 0 Email: mfenster@raklaw.com Reza Mirzaie (CA SBN ) Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com Brian D. Ledahl (CA
More informationJohn Allcock, DLA Piper US, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. California. HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P, Plaintiff. v. GATEWAY, INC, Defendant. Gateway, Inc, Counterclaim-Plaintiff. v. Hewlett-Packard Development Company
More information* * UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE SERIAL NO: 77/ MARK: GREEN PATENT BLOG. Lane, Eric L.
To: Subject: Sent: Sent As: Lane, Eric L. (elane@law.gwu.edu) TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77394276 - GREEN PATENT BLOG - N/A 5/21/2008 11:37:10 AM ECOM110@USPTO.GOV Attachments: Attachment - 1 Attachment
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, INC. DEFENDANTS.
More informationCase 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 06/20/18 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Wayne O. Stacy (SBN ) wayne.stacy@bakerbotts.com Sarah Guske (SBN ) sarah.guske@bakerbotts.com Jeremy J. Taylor (SBN 0) jeremy.taylor@bakerbotts.com 0 California
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTIC RECORDING CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:05-cv-00235-WBH DOES 1-125, Defendants. DECLARATION OF DAVID ARKUSH I, David Arkush,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS ZTE CORPORATION, ZTE (USA) INC., and ZTE SOLUTIONS,
More informationCase 8:17-cv Document 1 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 H.H. (SHASHI) KEWALRAMANI S H K Legal, APC P.O. Box Anaheim, CA 0 Telephone: () -0 Fax: () - Email: shashi@shklegal.com JONATHAN T. SUDER (Pro Hac
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, AND MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. PLAINTIFFS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KYOTOCOOLING NORTH AMERICA, LLC and AIR ENTERPRISES ACQUISITION LLC, Plaintiffs, v. NORTEK AIR SOLUTIONS, LLC, and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN NOKIA CORPORATION v. Plaintiff, APPLE INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. 10CV249 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 152 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1489
Case 5:16-cv-10203 Document 152 Filed 10/15/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1489 LUCENDA NICHOLES, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
More informationCLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER FOR UNITED STATES PATENT NUMBER 5,257,387
United States District Court, S.D. California. HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P, Plaintiff. v. GATEWAY, INC, Defendant. Gateway, Inc, Counterclaim-Plaintiff. v. Hewlett-Packard Development Company
More informationGlobal Phone Wars: Apple v. Samsung
Global Phone Wars: Apple v. Samsung Michael I. Shamos, Ph.D., J.D. School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Background Ph.D., Yale University (computer science, 1978) J.D., Duquesne University
More informationVONAGE HOLDINGS CORP
VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP FORM 8-K (Current report filing) Filed 10/1/2007 For Period Ending 9/25/2007 Address 23 MAIN STREET HOLMDEL, New Jersey 07733 Telephone 732-528-2600 CIK 0001272830 Industry Communications
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *
ALVERSON, TAYLOR, MORTENSEN & SANDERS KURT R. BONDS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. ADAM R. KNECHT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 W. Charleston Boulevard Las Vegas, NV efile@alversontaylor.com Attorneys for Plaintiff ALVERSON,
More informationNortel I Securities Litigation Settlement c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator P.O. Box 9000 #6446
Must be Postmarked No Later Than November 20, 2006 Nortel I Securities Litigation Settlement c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. NNY Claims Administrator P.O. Box 9000 #6446 *P-NNYF-POC/1* Merrick, NY 11566-9000
More informationCase 2:17-cv SJO-FFM Document 31 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 80 Page ID #:356
Case :-cv-0-sjo-ffm Document Filed // Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT Marc A. Fenster, SBN 0 Email: mfenster@raklaw.com Reza Mirzaie (CA SBN ) Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com Brian D. Ledahl (CA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.
Case 2:17-cv-07690-SJO-JC Document 27 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 32 Page ID #:411 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT Marc A. Fenster (CA SB No. 181067) Reza Mirzaie (CA SB No. 246953) Paul A. Kroeger (CA SB No. 229074)
More informationCase 2:17-cv JRG Document 86 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 771
Case 2:17-cv-00275-JRG Document 86 Filed 10/17/17 Page 1 of 18 PageID #: 771 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC USA, INC. et al Plaintiffs, v.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/14/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 271 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/14/2018
From: Fried, William Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 10:43 AM To: Kevin A. Fritz ; Christopher Gorman Cc: Stephen B. Meister ; Poddar, Shivani ' ;
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:17-cv-08717 Document 1 Filed 11/09/17 Page 1 of 22 HOLOTOUCH, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK v. Plaintiff, CASE NO. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant. / COMPLAINT
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF TRADEMARK NON-INFRINGEMENT, TRADEMARK NON-DILUTION, FOR NO UNFAIR COMPETITION AND FOR NO BREACH OF CONTRACT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------x : JOHN MCAFEE and MGT CAPITAL : Civil Action No.: INVESTMENTS, INC,
More informationUNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. AGILYSYS, INC. ET AL. Petitioner. AMERANTH, INC.
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 20 571-272-7822 Entered: March 26, 2014 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD AGILYSYS, INC. ET AL. Petitioner v. AMERANTH, INC. Patent
More informationCase 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 128 PageID: 1. Of Counsel:
Case 3:18-cv-06112 Document 1 Filed 04/11/18 Page 1 of 128 PageID: 1 Charles M. Lizza William C. Baton SAUL EWING ARNSTEIN & LEHR LLP One Riverfront Plaza, Suite 1520 Newark, NJ 07102-5426 (973) 286-6700
More informationJohn L. Haller, Richard P. Sybert, Gordon and Rees, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants.
United States District Court, S.D. California. EUROPEAN NATURAL STONE COMPANY, Inc., a California corporation, Plaintiff. v. BEDROCK CREATIONS, a business entity of unknown formation; Bull Outdoor Products,
More informationCase 1:12-cv SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:12-cv-00483-SLR Document 1 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC. vs. Plaintiff, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
More informationRESOLUTION DIGEST
RESOLUTION 07-02-04 DIGEST Consumer Sales: Service of Process on Designated Agent Amends Business and Professions Code section 17538.5 to provide that personal service of process may be effected via delivery
More informationUNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. STARBUCKS CORPORATION Petitioner. AMERANTH, INC.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD STARBUCKS CORPORATION Petitioner v. AMERANTH, INC. Patent Owner CASE: To Be Assigned Patent No. 6,871,32 B1 PETITION FOR
More informationCase 6:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 45 PageID #: 1
Case 6:18-cv-00215 Document 1 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 45 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC, Plaintiff, Case
More informationCase 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NEWARK VICINAGE
Case 2:17-cv-02794 Document 1 Filed 04/24/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NEWARK VICINAGE KEYNETIK, INC., Plaintiff, C.A. NO. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
More informationAttorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP ROBERT A. VAN NEST - #0 rvannest@kvn.com CHRISTA M. ANDERSON - # canderson@kvn.com MICHAEL S. KWUN - # mkwun@kvn.com Battery Street San Francisco, CA - Tel:..00 Fax:.. KING & SPALDING
More informationCase3:10-cv WHA Document899 Filed04/12/12 Page1 of 2
Case:0-cv-0-WHA Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. ) mjacobs@mofo.com MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. ) mdpeters@mofo.com DANIEL P. MUINO (Bar No. 0) dmuino@mofo.com Page Mill Road, Palo
More informationCase 2:08-cv GW-AGR Document 34 Filed 11/14/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case :0-cv-0-GW-AGR Document Filed //00 Page of 0 0 MICHAEL H. WEISS (State Bar No. 0 mweiss@proskauer.com PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 0 Century Park East, nd Floor Los Angeles, CA 00-0 Telephone: (0-00 Facsimile:
More informationTwitter, Inc. Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO TWEET /1/2009 9:00:28 PM
To: Twitter, Inc. (trademarks@fenwick.com) Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 77715815 - TWEET - 25980-00070 Sent: Sent As: 7/1/2009 9:00:28 PM ECOM110@USPTO.GOV Attachments: Attachment - 1 Attachment
More informationCase 5:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Case 5:15-cv-00128 Document 1 Filed 07/16/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION VENADIUM LLC, v. Plaintiff, LENOVO (UNITED STATES)
More informationCase 3:15-cv JAG Document 28 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 57 PageID# 379
Case 3:15-cv-00720-JAG Document 28 Filed 02/16/16 Page 1 of 57 PageID# 379 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No.
More informationCase 6:12-cv RWS Document 570 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 43250
Case 6:12-cv-00855-RWS Document 570 Filed 02/01/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 43250 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION VIRNETX INC., and LEIDOS, INC., v. Plaintiffs,
More information