MEMORANDUM. Corona Subdivision XP Storm Evaluation. Date: March 5, Curt Bates, City of Petaluma. David S. Smith, P.E., WEST Consultants, Inc.
|
|
- Morris Hampton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 MEMORANDUM Project: Corona Subdivision XP Storm Evaluation Subject: Results Summary Date: March 5, 2013 To: Curt Bates, City of Petaluma No. C EXP. 12/31/14 From: David S. Smith, P.E., WEST Consultants, Inc. This memo summarizes the analysis completed by WEST Consultants, Inc. (WEST) for the City of Petaluma (the City) to evaluate the hydraulic impact of the proposed Corona Subdivision, located between Corona Road and the intersection of Andover Way and Monica Way (see Figure 1). Modeling completed by WEST for the FEMA map revision currently in process includes breakout flows from Corona Creek in the area of the proposed development. Elevating the Corona Subdivision to remove it from the 100 year floodplain will increase the water surface elevation in adjacent residential areas. Therefore, a new detention basin just upstream of Road is planned to mitigate the lost floodplain storage due to development. XP Storm version 2010 (build May 20, 2010) was used in this evaluation. The methods used to evaluate the hydraulic effects of the Corona Subdivision and the Road detention basin are described below along with tabular modeling results for the 10 year and 100 year events and a flood boundary map for the 100 year event. 1 of 7
2 March 5, 2013 Road Detention Corona Subdivision Modeling Approach Figure 1. Corona Subdivision and Road Detention Location The City s 10 year and 100 year XP Storm models that are the basis of the FEMA remapping effort were used for evaluating the Corona Subdivision (filenames 10yr_ xp and 100yr_ xp ). The following detail was added to the model(s) in the vicinity of Corona Creek (see Figure 2): 9 nodes were added in the right overbank of Corona Creek in the vicinity of the breakout at node cc_02 (Stonehenge Way, Andover Way, Mauro Pietro Drive, Sonoma Mountain Parkway, and Wellington Place): o cc2_l102 o cc2_l108 o cc2_l012 WEST Consultants, Inc. 2 of 8
3 March 5, 2013 o cc2_l120 o cc2_l1 o cc2_l1 o cc2_l1 o cc2_l1 o cc2_l170 The 8 x 12 culvert for Corona Creek at Wellington Place was added to the model (along with a weir for overtopping flows). Model nodes cc_0202 and cc_0203 were added, along with the following culvert details: o Upstream invert elevation = 27.5 o Downstream invert elevation = 27.2 o Length =.8 feet o Overtopping flow crest elevation = 36.8 o Overtopping flow weir width = 62 feet The pedestrian bridge for Corona Creek just upstream of Wellington Place was added to the model (along with a weir for overtopping flows). Model nodes cc_0207 and cc_0208 were added, along with the following bridge details: o Upstream invert elevation = o Downstream invert elevation = o Length = 10.7 feet o Overtopping flow crest elevation = 36.7 o Overtopping flow weir width = feet o The bridge opening is modeled as a user defined conduit with a table of depth, flow area, wetted perimeter, and top width. The low chord of the pedestrian bridge is modeled at a depth of 6.12 feet (corresponds to elevation 35.5), with a flow area of ft 2, wetted perimeter of 63.3 feet, and top width of 61.9 feet. WEST Consultants, Inc. 3 of 8
4 March 5, 2013 Figure 2. Corona Creek XP Model Detail The model filenames including the above detail were renamed Corona_10yr_weir473 _28.xp for the 10 year event and Corona_100yr_weir473_28.xp for the 100 year event. Both models include three scenarios: Base Scenario, Post Project Scenario, and Storage Scenario. The Base Scenario represents existing conditions with the detail described above. The Post Project Scenario is a modification to the Base Scenario with the removal of flood storage at the Corona Subdivision between model nodes cc2_l110 and cc2_l108 to account for placement of fill. The Storage Scenario is a modification to the Post Project Scenario with detention added upstream of Road at model node cc320_l010 (see Figure 3). WEST Consultants, Inc. 4 of 8
5 March 5, 2013 Road Detention Figure 3. Storage at XP Model Node cc320_l010 The dimensions of the proposed detention basin north of Road are summarized in Table 1 based on data provided by Steven J. Lafrachi and Associates, Inc. The top of the detention basin along Road is elevation 52.1 feet, NAVD based on review of the City s 2003 topography. This elevation is close to the Road elevation on the south side of the basin, and less than the natural ground elevation on the north and west sides of the basin. The bottom of the basin is modeled as elevation 45.1 feet, NAVD with side slopes of two units horizontal to one unit vertical (2H:1V). WEST Consultants, Inc. 5 of 8
6 March 5, 2013 Table 1. Elevation Area Relationship of the Proposed Road Detention Basin Elevation Depth Area ft, NGVD ft, NAVD ft, NAVD ft 2 ac The detention basin connection to Corona Creek is modeled with a 20 foot wide sharp crested weir with a crest elevation of 47.3 feet. The coefficient of discharge for the weir is a function of the weir crest height, the depth of flow over the weir, the channel velocity in Corona Creek, and the angle/shape of the weir relative to flow in Corona Creek. The coefficient of discharge for the lateral weir was calculated based on the following equation which relates the lateral weir coefficient to the normal weir coefficient 1 : C = C n * ((Fw 2 + 2)/(3 Fw 2 + 2)) 0.5 Where: C = discharge coefficient for a lateral weir C n = discharge coefficient for a normal weir = (H / p) for a sharp crested weir 2 H = measured head above the weir crest p = weir crest above invert Fw 2 = v 2 / g (y p) v = channel flow velocity at the cross section where C is being determined y = stage in channel For the 100 year event, the lateral weir coefficient is calculated to range from about 2.4 to 3.2, and for the 10 year event from about 2.2 to 2.9. An average value of 2.8 was used in the model for both events. An 18 inch culvert is included in the model to drain the detention basin, and this was modeled with a flap gate to prevent flow from Corona Creek from filling the detention 1 Hydraulic Engineering, Proceedings of the 1988 National Conference sponsored by the Hydraulics Division of ASCE, Colorado Springs, CO, August 8-12, 1988, pp Chow, V.T., Open-Channel Hydraulics, McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, 1959, p.362 WEST Consultants, Inc. 6 of 8
7 March 5, 2013 basin during the rising limb of the hydrograph. The modeled pipe is 100 feet long with a 0.1 percent slope (elevation 45.1 upstream to elevation 45 downstream). Design of the weir crest is recommended as an adjustable crest using stop logs or similar modular components at no more than half foot increments to allow for plus or minus 2 feet adjustment. This is recommended because the model is based on a calibration that did not include any stream gages along Corona Creek. In addition, the cross section geometry just upstream of Road is based on low detail USGS topography. In the future, updating the hydrologic modeling assumptions and model cross section geometry in this reach may lead to a different conclusion regarding the preferred weir crest elevation and/or the length of the weir. Results Without detention, the 100 year water surface elevation due to the Corona Subdivision would increase by a maximum of 0.41 feet in the vicinity of the project. Downstream on the Petaluma River, the peak discharge would increase by about 20 cfs and the maximum water surface elevation would increase by about 0.01 feet. Due to these increases, the Road detention area is recommended. Tabular comparisons of model results for the 10 and 100 year event are provided in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Flood boundary results for existing conditions and project conditions (the Corona Subdivision with the Road detention basin) for the 100 year event are provided as Exhibit 1. The detention basin reduces 100 year event flooding in the vicinity of the Corona Subdivision by an average of about 0.7 feet. This reduction is the result of less flow breaking out from Corona Creek toward Stonehenge Way and Andover Way at model node CC2_L010. The lowest pad elevation of 39.4 feet NAVD is higher than the maximum water surface elevation of feet NAVD in this location, therefore the breakout flow would be essentially contained in the street and would not need to be shown on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps during the Map Change processing for this project. The 100 year water surface elevation is also reduced in Corona Creek by an average of about 0.6 feet, and in the Petaluma River by an average of about 0.02 feet. The maximum 100 year water surface elevation in the Road detention basin is feet. This corresponds to a maximum depth of 4.61 feet and 2.39 feet of freeboard. For the 10 year event, the maximum water surface elevation is feet. This corresponds to a maximum depth of 2.21 feet and 4.79 feet of freeboard. WEST Consultants, Inc. 7 of 8
8 March 5, 2013 Conclusions The proposed Road detention basin size, weir elevation, and weir width described above represents a maximized detention configuration for the area upstream of Road. According to the model results, the proposed Corona Subdivision project with the Road detention basin reduces water surface elevations below existing elevations not only for the project site vicinity but also Corona Creek and the Petaluma River. WEST Consultants, Inc. 8 of 8
9 March 5, 2013 Table 2 10 year XP Storm Results for and With Project (Corona Subdivision plus Road
10 Flooding Source Corona Creek Link ID U/S Node D/S Node Peak Discharge (cfs) U/S Node Water Surface Elevation Link1297 cc2_l010 cc2_l Link14 cc2_l010 CC2_L Link1871 CC2_L012 cc2_l Link1872 CC2_L012 CC2_L Link1298 cc2_l020 cc2_l Link1299 cc2_l0 cc2_l Link15 cc2_l090 cc2_l Link1870 cc2_l090 CC2_L Link1869 cc2_l100 CC2_L Link16 CC2_L108 cc2_l Link1873 CC2_L120 CC2_L Link1874 CC2_L120 CC2_L Link1876 CC2_L1 CC2_l Link1875 CC2_L1 CC2_L Link1877 CC2_l1 CC2_L cc0202l CC2_L170 cc_ cc320c cc320_l010 cc_ cc321c cc320_l010 cc_ cc320w cc320_l010 cc_ LCC1_963.1 cc_00 pr_05n lcc_00 cc_00 cc_ lcc_00 cc_00 cc_ L1166 cc_00 pr_ lcc_0070 cc_0070 cc_ lcc_0075 cc_0075 cc_ UW_ccTP070 cc_0075 cctp lcc_0080 cc_0080 cc_ L1124 cc_0080 pr_ UW_ccTP065 cc_0080 cctp lcc_0085 cc_0085 cc_ UW_ccTP0 cc_0085 cctp0 0 0 lcc_0090 cc_0090 cc_ L1123 cc_0090 pr_0590n UW_ccTP045 cc_0090 cctp lcc_0100 cc_0100 cc_ UW_ccTP0 cc_0100 cctp0 0 0 lcc_0110 cc_0110 cc_ UW_ccTP020 cc_0110 cctp lcc_01 cc_01 cc_ UW_ccTP010 cc_01 cctp lcc_01 cc_01 cc_ lcc_01 cc_01 cc_ lcc_01 cc_01 cc_ lcc_0170 cc_0170 cc_ LC1_ cc_0180 cc_ LC1_ cc_0180 cc_ LC1_ cc_0180 cc_ ccrrweir cc_0180 cc_ lcc_0190 cc_0190 cc_ lcc_0200 cc_0200 cc_ Link1868 cc_0202 cc_ lcc_ cc_0203 cc_ lcc_0203w cc_0203 cc_ lcc_0207 cc_0207 cc_ lcc_ cc_0208 cc_ lcc_0208w cc_0208 cc_ lcc_0208w2 cc_0208 cc_ lcc_0210 cc_0210 cc_ lcc_0220 cc_0220 cc_
11 Flooding Source Link ID U/S Node D/S Node Peak Discharge (cfs) U/S Node Water Surface Elevation lcc_02 cc_02 cc_ cc02l cc_02 cc2_l cc2r cc_02 cc2_r lcc_02 cc_02 cc_ cc02- cc_02 cc_ cc_02 cc_ cc02-l cc_02 cc2_l0 0 0 lcc_02 cc_02 cc_ lcc_0270 cc_0270 cc_ lcc_0280 cc_0280 cc_ lcc_0290 cc_0290 cc_ lcc_00 cc_00 cc_ lcc_0310 cc_0310 cc_ UW cc_0320 cc_ cc_0320 cc_ lcc_03 cc_03 cc_ lcc_03 cc_03 cc_ lcc_03 cc_03 cc_ lcc_03 cc_03 cc_ lcc_0370 cc_0370 cc_ lcc_0380 cc_0380 cc_ Link1317 cctp010 cctp Link1326 cctp010 cctp Link1318 cctp020 cctp Link1319 cctp0 cctp Link1338 cctp0 cctp Link1339 cctp0 cctp Link1337 cctp045 cctp Link1320 cctp0 cctp Link1334 cctp0 cctp Link1321 cctp0 cctp Link1342 cctp065 cctp Link1322 cctp070 cctp Link1333 cctp070 cctp Link1323 cctp080 cctp Link1324 cctp090 cctp Link1329 cctp090 cctp Link1325 cctp100 cctp Link1336 cctp110 cctp Link1332 cctp120 cctp Link13 cctp1 cctp Link1331 cctp1 cctp Link1335 cctp1 cctp Link13 cctp1 cctp Link1328 cctp170 cctp Link1327 cctp180 cctp Link1256 Cor-CC_10 pr_06n Link1736 Cor-CC_10 Cor-CC_ Link1255 Cor-CC_20 pr_00n Link1737 Cor-CC_20 Cor-CC_ Link1826 Cor-CC_ cc_ lpc_04 pc_04 pr_ lpc_0800 pc_0800 pc_ lpc_1525 pc_1525 pc_ lpr_0020 pr_0020 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_
12 Flooding Source Petaluma River Link ID U/S Node D/S Node Peak Discharge (cfs) U/S Node Water Surface Elevation lpr_0070 pr_0070 pr_ lpr_0080 pr_0080 pr_ lpr_0090 pr_0090 pr_ lpr_0100 pr_0094 pr_ Link12 pr_0096 pr_ Link1229 pr_0098 pr_ Link1228 pr_0100 pr_ lpr_0110 pr_0110 pr_ lpr_0120 pr_0120 pr_ lpr_01 pr_01 pr_ lpr_01 pr_01 pr_ lpr_01 pr_01 pr_ lpr_01 pr_01 pr_ lpr_0170 pr_0170 pr_ lpr_0180 pr_0180 pr_ lpr_0190 pr_0190 pr_ lpr_0195 pr_0195 pr_ lpr_0200 pr_0200 pr_ Link1239 pr_0206 pr_ lpr_0208 pr_0208 pr_ lpr_0210 pr_0210 pr_ lpr_0220 pr_0220 pr_ lpr_02 pr_02 pr_ lpr_02 pr_02 pr_ lpr_02 pr_02 pr_ lpr_02 pr_02 pr_ lpr_0270 pr_0270 pr_ lpr_0280 pr_0280 pr_ lpr_0290 pr_0290 pr_ lpr_0298 pr_0298 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_08 pr_08 pr_ lpr_0310 pr_0310 pr_ lpr_0320 pr_0320 pr_ lpr_03 pr_03 pr_ lpr_0338 pr_0338 pr_ lpr_03 pr_03 pr_ lpr_03 pr_03 pr_ lpr_03 pr_03 pr_ lpr_0370 pr_0370 pr_ lpr_0380 pr_0380 pr_ lpr_0390 pr_0390 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_0420 pr_0420 pr_ lpr_04 pr_04 pr_ lpr_04 pr_04 pr_ lpr_0445 pr_0445 pr_ lpr_0448 pr_0448 pr_ lpr_04 pr_04 pr_ lpr_0452 pr_0452 pr_ lpr_0458 pr_0458 pr_ lpr_04 pr_04 pr_ lpr_0465 pr_0465 pr_ lpr_0470 pr_0470 pr_ lpr_0480 pr_0480 pr_ lpr_0490 pr_0490 pr_ lpr_0496 pr_0496 pr_ lpr_0498 pr_0498 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_
13 Flooding Source Link ID U/S Node D/S Node Peak Discharge (cfs) U/S Node Water Surface Elevation lpr_0510 pr_0510 pr_ lpr_0520 pr_0520 pr_ lpr_05 pr_05n pr_ lpr_05 pr_05n pr_05n lpr_05 pr_05 pr_05n lpr_0552 pr_0552 pr_ pr_0554 pr_ pr_0554 pr_ lpr_05 pr_05 pr_ lpr_0570 pr_0570 pr_ lpr_0580 pr_0580 pr_ lpr_0590 pr_0590n pr_ lpr_00 pr_00n pr_0590n lpr_06 pr_06n pr_00n UWCorona pr_07n pr_06n pr_07n pr_06n lpr_08 pr_08n pr_07n lpr_0610 pr_0610n pr_08n lpr_0612 pr_0612n pr_0610n lpr_0614 pr_0614n pr_0612n lpr_0616 pr_0616n pr_0614n lpr_0618 pr_0618n pr_0616n lpr_0620 pr_0620n pr_0618n lpr_06 pr_06n pr_0620n lpr_06 pr_06n pr_06n lpr_06 pr_06 pr_06n lpr_06 pr_06 pr_ lpr_0670 pr_0670n pr_ lpr_0680 pr_0680n pr_0670n lob pr_0682 pr_0680n pr_0682 pr_0680n lob pr_0684 pr_ pr_0684 pr_ lpr_0690 pr_0690n pr_ lpr_0700 pr_0700 pr_0690n lpr_0710 pr_0710 pr_ lpr_0720 pr_0720 pr_ lpr_0723 pr_0723 pr_ pr_0725 pr_ pr_0725 pr_ lpr_07 pr_07 pr_ lpr_07 pr_07 pr_ pr_0745 pr_ pr_0745 pr_ lpr_07 pr_07 pr_ lpr_07 pr_07 pr_ Notes: (1) Change due to project--negative values indicate a decrease, and positive values an increase. Differences in discharge less than 1 cfs and water surface elevation less than 0.01 feet are left blank. Legend: = removed for project conditions (storage in empty field) = added for project conditions (detention basin)
14 March 5, 2013 Table year XP Storm Results for and With Project (Corona Subdivision plus Road
15 Flooding Source Corona Creek Link ID U/S Node D/S Node Peak Discharge (cfs) U/S Node Water Surface Elevation Link1297 cc2_l010 cc2_l Link14 cc2_l010 CC2_L Link1871 CC2_L012 cc2_l Link1872 CC2_L012 CC2_L Link1298 cc2_l020 cc2_l Link1299 cc2_l0 cc2_l Link15 cc2_l090 cc2_l Link1870 cc2_l090 CC2_L Link1869 cc2_l100 CC2_L Link16 CC2_L108 cc2_l Link1873 CC2_L120 CC2_L Link1874 CC2_L120 CC2_L Link1876 CC2_L1 CC2_l Link1875 CC2_L1 CC2_L Link1877 CC2_l1 CC2_L cc0202l CC2_L170 cc_ cc320c cc320_l010 cc_ cc321c cc320_l010 cc_ cc320w cc320_l010 cc_ LCC1_963.1 cc_00 pr_05n lcc_00 cc_00 cc_ lcc_00 cc_00 cc_ L1166 cc_00 pr_ lcc_0070 cc_0070 cc_ lcc_0075 cc_0075 cc_ UW_ccTP070 cc_0075 cctp lcc_0080 cc_0080 cc_ L1124 cc_0080 pr_ UW_ccTP065 cc_0080 cctp lcc_0085 cc_0085 cc_ UW_ccTP0 cc_0085 cctp lcc_0090 cc_0090 cc_ L1123 cc_0090 pr_0590n UW_ccTP045 cc_0090 cctp lcc_0100 cc_0100 cc_ UW_ccTP0 cc_0100 cctp lcc_0110 cc_0110 cc_ UW_ccTP020 cc_0110 cctp lcc_01 cc_01 cc_ UW_ccTP010 cc_01 cctp lcc_01 cc_01 cc_ lcc_01 cc_01 cc_ lcc_01 cc_01 cc_ lcc_0170 cc_0170 cc_ LC1_ cc_0180 cc_ LC1_ cc_0180 cc_ LC1_ cc_0180 cc_ ccrrweir cc_0180 cc_ lcc_0190 cc_0190 cc_ lcc_0200 cc_0200 cc_ Link1868 cc_0202 cc_ lcc_ cc_0203 cc_ lcc_0203w cc_0203 cc_ lcc_0207 cc_0207 cc_ lcc_ cc_0208 cc_ lcc_0208w cc_0208 cc_ lcc_0208w2 cc_0208 cc_ lcc_0210 cc_0210 cc_ lcc_0220 cc_0220 cc_
16 Flooding Source Link ID U/S Node D/S Node Peak Discharge (cfs) U/S Node Water Surface Elevation lcc_02 cc_02 cc_ cc02l cc_02 cc2_l cc2r cc_02 cc2_r lcc_02 cc_02 cc_ cc02- cc_02 cc_ cc_02 cc_ cc02-l cc_02 cc2_l lcc_02 cc_02 cc_ lcc_0270 cc_0270 cc_ lcc_0280 cc_0280 cc_ lcc_0290 cc_0290 cc_ lcc_00 cc_00 cc_ lcc_0310 cc_0310 cc_ UW cc_0320 cc_ cc_0320 cc_ lcc_03 cc_03 cc_ lcc_03 cc_03 cc_ lcc_03 cc_03 cc_ lcc_03 cc_03 cc_ lcc_0370 cc_0370 cc_ lcc_0380 cc_0380 cc_ Link1317 cctp010 cctp Link1326 cctp010 cctp Link1318 cctp020 cctp Link1319 cctp0 cctp Link1338 cctp0 cctp Link1339 cctp0 cctp Link1337 cctp045 cctp Link1320 cctp0 cctp Link1334 cctp0 cctp Link1321 cctp0 cctp Link1342 cctp065 cctp Link1322 cctp070 cctp Link1333 cctp070 cctp Link1323 cctp080 cctp Link1324 cctp090 cctp Link1329 cctp090 cctp Link1325 cctp100 cctp Link1336 cctp110 cctp Link1332 cctp120 cctp Link13 cctp1 cctp Link1331 cctp1 cctp Link1335 cctp1 cctp Link13 cctp1 cctp Link1328 cctp170 cctp Link1327 cctp180 cctp Link1256 Cor-CC_10 pr_06n Link1736 Cor-CC_10 Cor-CC_ Link1255 Cor-CC_20 pr_00n Link1737 Cor-CC_20 Cor-CC_ Link1826 Cor-CC_ cc_ lpc_04 pc_04 pr_ lpc_0800 pc_0800 pc_ lpc_1525 pc_1525 pc_ lpr_0020 pr_0020 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_
17 Flooding Source Petaluma River Link ID U/S Node D/S Node Peak Discharge (cfs) U/S Node Water Surface Elevation lpr_0070 pr_0070 pr_ lpr_0080 pr_0080 pr_ lpr_0090 pr_0090 pr_ lpr_0100 pr_0094 pr_ Link12 pr_0096 pr_ Link1229 pr_0098 pr_ Link1228 pr_0100 pr_ lpr_0110 pr_0110 pr_ lpr_0120 pr_0120 pr_ lpr_01 pr_01 pr_ lpr_01 pr_01 pr_ lpr_01 pr_01 pr_ lpr_01 pr_01 pr_ lpr_0170 pr_0170 pr_ lpr_0180 pr_0180 pr_ lpr_0190 pr_0190 pr_ lpr_0195 pr_0195 pr_ lpr_0200 pr_0200 pr_ Link1239 pr_0206 pr_ lpr_0208 pr_0208 pr_ lpr_0210 pr_0210 pr_ lpr_0220 pr_0220 pr_ lpr_02 pr_02 pr_ lpr_02 pr_02 pr_ lpr_02 pr_02 pr_ lpr_02 pr_02 pr_ lpr_0270 pr_0270 pr_ lpr_0280 pr_0280 pr_ lpr_0290 pr_0290 pr_ lpr_0298 pr_0298 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_08 pr_08 pr_ lpr_0310 pr_0310 pr_ lpr_0320 pr_0320 pr_ lpr_03 pr_03 pr_ lpr_0338 pr_0338 pr_ lpr_03 pr_03 pr_ lpr_03 pr_03 pr_ lpr_03 pr_03 pr_ lpr_0370 pr_0370 pr_ lpr_0380 pr_0380 pr_ lpr_0390 pr_0390 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_ lpr_0420 pr_0420 pr_ lpr_04 pr_04 pr_ lpr_04 pr_04 pr_ lpr_0445 pr_0445 pr_ lpr_0448 pr_0448 pr_ lpr_04 pr_04 pr_ lpr_0452 pr_0452 pr_ lpr_0458 pr_0458 pr_ lpr_04 pr_04 pr_ lpr_0465 pr_0465 pr_ lpr_0470 pr_0470 pr_ lpr_0480 pr_0480 pr_ lpr_0490 pr_0490 pr_ lpr_0496 pr_0496 pr_ lpr_0498 pr_0498 pr_ lpr_00 pr_00 pr_
18 Flooding Source Link ID U/S Node D/S Node Peak Discharge (cfs) U/S Node Water Surface Elevation lpr_0510 pr_0510 pr_ lpr_0520 pr_0520 pr_ lpr_05 pr_05n pr_ lpr_05 pr_05n pr_05n lpr_05 pr_05 pr_05n lpr_0552 pr_0552 pr_ pr_0554 pr_ pr_0554 pr_ lpr_05 pr_05 pr_ lpr_0570 pr_0570 pr_ lpr_0580 pr_0580 pr_ lpr_0590 pr_0590n pr_ lpr_00 pr_00n pr_0590n lpr_06 pr_06n pr_00n UWCorona pr_07n pr_06n pr_07n pr_06n lpr_08 pr_08n pr_07n lpr_0610 pr_0610n pr_08n lpr_0612 pr_0612n pr_0610n lpr_0614 pr_0614n pr_0612n lpr_0616 pr_0616n pr_0614n lpr_0618 pr_0618n pr_0616n lpr_0620 pr_0620n pr_0618n lpr_06 pr_06n pr_0620n lpr_06 pr_06n pr_06n lpr_06 pr_06 pr_06n lpr_06 pr_06 pr_ lpr_0670 pr_0670n pr_ lpr_0680 pr_0680n pr_0670n lob pr_0682 pr_0680n pr_0682 pr_0680n lob pr_0684 pr_ pr_0684 pr_ lpr_0690 pr_0690n pr_ lpr_0700 pr_0700 pr_0690n lpr_0710 pr_0710 pr_ lpr_0720 pr_0720 pr_ lpr_0723 pr_0723 pr_ pr_0725 pr_ pr_0725 pr_ lpr_07 pr_07 pr_ lpr_07 pr_07 pr_ pr_0745 pr_ pr_0745 pr_ lpr_07 pr_07 pr_ lpr_07 pr_07 pr_ Notes: (1) Change due to project--negative values indicate a decrease, and positive values an increase. Differences in discharge less than 1 cfs and water surface elevation less than 0.01 feet are left blank. Legend: = removed for project conditions (storage in empty field) = added for project conditions (detention basin)
19 March 5, 2013 Exhibit 1 Flood Boundary Comparison Map for 100 year Storm in vicinity of Corona Creek
20 cc_03 cc_03 nn ha ac ro n Co ee k Cr Co ro na 80 cc_0320 cc_0310 N. cc_03 cc_03 el Reisling Road Detention cc_00 cc02_l0 cc02_l070 cc02_l0 N OW SH T NO AI N PL EK RE IC PR CA CaC_R52 Parcels Buildings City Limits Proposed Detention Basin Project - Corona Subdivision and Detention CaC_R1 CaC_R2 0 µ Corona Subdivision and Proposed Condition Flood Boundary Comparison CaC_R1 CaC_TP80 CaC_R190 CaC_R foot Contours CaC_R110 CaC_TP70CaC_R1 cc_00 cc_0020 XP-SWMM Nodes pr_05 Stream Centerlines CaC_R76 CaC_TP CaC_TP cc_00 1 FL 4 O O0 D 20 pr_0570 CaC_0047 CaC_R54 Legend 20 CaC_TP pr_0580 CaC_R90 CaC_L120CaC_L04 CaC_R80 CaC_L1 CaC_L02 CaC_R20 CaC_L1 CaC_0584 CaC_R CaC_R70 CaC_L1 CaC_TP10 CaC_L1 CaC_R72 CaC_R CaC_L170 CaC_03CaC_R100 CaC_R74 CaC_TP20 cc_00 CaC_R94 CaC_R92 TE : cc_00 CaC_R96 CaC_L110 CaC_L CaC_L CaC_L CaC_L cc_0070 CaC_L70 cctp080 CaC_L CaC_L80 cc_0075 CaC_L90 cctp1 cctp070 cctp100 cctp090 cctp cctp1 70 cctp170 cc_0080 cctp110 cctp065 pr_0590 CaC_28 cctp0 cctp180 cctp1 cctp0 cc_0085 cc_0090 CaC_36 CaC_32 cctp1 cctp CaC_3898 McDow85 McDow83 cc_0100 cctp0 CaC_4446 McDow82 McDow86 pr_00 cc_0202 McDow81 cc_0110 cctp020 CaC_4448 CaC_3900 Cor-CC_ CaC_44 cctp010 CaC_44 CaC_4848 CaC_4846 McDow80 Cor-CC_10 cc_01 cc_01 cc_01 cc_01 70 NO cc_0170 Holm_55 cc2_r CaC_48 cc2_r cc_0190 McDow56 Holm cc2_r10 cc_0200 McDow70 McDow54 McDow58 cc02_l170 cc2_r cc2_r20 McDow48 cc_02 cc_0208cc_0207 McDowMcDow62 McDow45 CaC_5171 cc_0220 McDow cc02_l012 cc02_l120 cc02_l010 cc02_l1 McDow46 RR78 cc_02 cc02_l1 cc02_l1 RR80 cc02_l0 cc_02 cc02_l020 RR76 RR90 cc_02 Corona Subdivision McDow42 cc02_l0 RR74 RR70 cc02_l080cc_ cc_ cc_ Feet Vertical Datum = NAVD 1988 February 2013
Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling Modeling with the Hydraulic Toolbox
v. 9.1 WMS 9.1 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling Modeling with the Hydraulic Toolbox Learn how to design inlet grates, detention basins, channels, and riprap using the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox
More informationWMS 10.0 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS
v. 10.0 WMS 10.0 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HY-8 Modeling Wizard Learn how to model a culvert using HY-8 and WMS Objectives Define a conceptual schematic of the roadway, invert, and downstream
More informationUpper Trinity River Corridor Development Certificate Model Updates. Flood Management Task Force Meeting April 20, 2018
Upper Trinity River Corridor Development Certificate Model Updates Flood Management Task Force Meeting April 20, 2018 Agenda Review of the Phase II Upper Trinity Watershed CDC Model Development Hydrology
More information2D Model Implementation for Complex Floodplain Studies. Sam Crampton, P.E., CFM Dewberry
2D Model Implementation for Complex Floodplain Studies Sam Crampton, P.E., CFM Dewberry 2D Case Studies Case Study 1 Rain-on-Grid 2D floodplain simulation for unconfined flat topography in coastal plain
More informationLinear Routing: Floodrouting. HEC-RAS Introduction. Brays Bayou. Uniform Open Channel Flow. v = 1 n R2/3. S S.I. units
Linear Routing: Floodrouting HEC-RAS Introduction Shirley Clark Penn State Harrisburg Robert Pitt University of Alabama April 26, 2004 Two (2) types of floodrouting of a hydrograph Linear Muskingum Reservoir
More informationUrban Floodplain modeling- Application of Two-Dimensional Analyses to Refine Results
Urban Floodplain modeling- Application of Two-Dimensional Analyses to Refine Results Prabharanjani Madduri, P.E., CFM Mathini Sreetharan, Ph.D., P.E., CFM Hydraulic modeling of urban areas and issues Modeling
More informationMulti-Stage Outlet Structures
Methods in Stormwater Management Using HydroCAD Multi-Stage Outlet Structures H09 Multi-Stage Outlet Structures.pdf 1 Topics 1. Multi-State Outlet Structures Definition 2. Orifice and Weir Equations 3.
More informationLearn how to link a hydrologic model to the SWMM storm drain model
v. 10.1 WMS 10.1 Tutorial Learn how to link a hydrologic model to the SWMM storm drain model Objectives Build a rational method hydrologic model and compute sub-basin flows. Import storm drain network
More informationUNDERSTAND HOW TO SET UP AND RUN A HYDRAULIC MODEL IN HEC-RAS CREATE A FLOOD INUNDATION MAP IN ARCGIS.
CE 412/512, Spring 2017 HW9: Introduction to HEC-RAS and Floodplain Mapping Due: end of class, print and hand in. HEC-RAS is a Hydrologic Modeling System that is designed to describe the physical properties
More informationCHAPTER 7 FLOOD HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGIC VIVEK VERMA
CHAPTER 7 FLOOD HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGIC VIVEK VERMA CONTENTS 1. Flow Classification 2. Chezy s and Manning Equation 3. Specific Energy 4. Surface Water Profiles 5. Hydraulic Jump 6. HEC-RAS 7. HEC-HMS
More informationIntroducion to Hydrologic Engineering Centers River Analysis System (HEC- RAS) Neena Isaac Scientist D CWPRS, Pune -24
Introducion to Hydrologic Engineering Centers River Analysis System (HEC- RAS) Neena Isaac Scientist D CWPRS, Pune -24 One dimensional river models (1-D models) Assumptions Flow is one dimensional Streamline
More informationAppendix E-1. Hydrology Analysis
Appendix E-1 Hydrology Analysis July 2016 HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS For Tentative Tract 20049 City of Chino Hills County of San Bernardino Prepared For: 450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 300 Newport Beach, CA 92660
More informationHCFCD Review Process
HCFCD Review Process Impact Analysis Local Review LOMR Delegation Local Review This presentation will include: Why is this step important? Process Review Checklist Common Comments 2 Local Review Why is
More information2D Large Scale Automated Engineering for FEMA Floodplain Development in South Dakota. Eli Gruber, PE Brooke Conner, PE
2D Large Scale Automated Engineering for FEMA Floodplain Development in South Dakota Eli Gruber, PE Brooke Conner, PE Project Acknowledgments FEMA Region 8 Staff: Brooke Conner, PE Casey Zuzak, GISP Ryan
More informationHEC-RAS. A Tutorial (Model Development of a Small Flume)
HEC-RAS A Tutorial (Model Development of a Small Flume) HEC-RAS Hydraulic Engineering Center:River Analysis System 1-D step backwater model Utilizes energy equation to compute water surface elevation for
More informationPrepared for CIVE 401 Hydraulic Engineering By Kennard Lai, Patrick Ndolo Goy & Dr. Pierre Julien Fall 2015
Prepared for CIVE 401 Hydraulic Engineering By Kennard Lai, Patrick Ndolo Goy & Dr. Pierre Julien Fall 2015 Contents Introduction General Philosophy Overview of Capabilities Applications Computational
More informationPRACTICAL UNIT 1 exercise task
Practical Unit 1 1 1 PRACTICAL UNIT 1 exercise task Developing a hydraulic model with HEC RAS using schematic river geometry data In the course of practical unit 1 we prepare the input for the execution
More informationFLOODPLAIN MODELING MANUAL. HEC-RAS Procedures for HEC-2 Modelers
FLOODPLAIN MODELING MANUAL HEC-RAS Procedures for HEC-2 Modelers Federal Emergency Management Agency Mitigation Directorate 500 C Street, SW Washington, DC 20472 April 2002 Floodplain Modeling Manual HEC-RAS
More informationWMS 10.0 Tutorial Storm Drain Modeling SWMM Modeling Learn how to link a hydrologic model to the SWMM storm drain model
v. 10.0 WMS 10.0 Tutorial Learn how to link a hydrologic model to the SWMM storm drain model Objectives Build a rational method hydrologic model and compute sub-basin flows. Import storm drain network
More informationWMS 9.1 Tutorial Storm Drain Modeling SWMM Modeling Learn how to link a hydrologic model to the SWMM storm drain model
v. 9.1 WMS 9.1 Tutorial Learn how to link a hydrologic model to the SWMM storm drain model Objectives Build a rational method hydrologic model and compute sub-basin flows. Import storm drain network information
More informationDucks on the Pond: Stormwater Management Basin Analysis Using AutoCAD Civil 3D and Autodesk SSA
Ducks on the Pond: Stormwater Management Basin Analysis Using AutoCAD Civil 3D and Autodesk Josh Kehs, P.E. Autodesk, Inc. CI4541 Learning Objectives At the end of this class, you will be able to: Model
More informationWMS 8.4 Tutorial Watershed Modeling MODRAT Interface Schematic Build a MODRAT model by defining a hydrologic schematic
v. 8.4 WMS 8.4 Tutorial Watershed Modeling MODRAT Interface Schematic Build a MODRAT model by defining a hydrologic schematic Objectives This tutorial shows you how to define a basic MODRAT model using
More informationModeling Detention Ponds Malaysian Example (v2009)
Modeling Detention Ponds Malaysian Example (v2009) This tutorial demonstrates the usability of xpswmm and xpstorm for simulating detention basins in urban areas. This fictitious example includes the use
More informationCross Sections, Profiles, and Rating Curves. Viewing Results From The River System Schematic. Viewing Data Contained in an HEC-DSS File
C H A P T E R 9 Viewing Results After the model has finished the steady or unsteady flow computations the user can begin to view the output. Output is available in a graphical and tabular format. The current
More informationAppendix E. HEC-RAS and HEC-Ecosystem Functions Models
Appendix E HEC-RAS and HEC-Ecosystem Functions Models 1 Appendix E: Modeled Reaches for the Connecticut River Watershed application of HEC-RAS Separate from the report for the Decision Support System of
More informationEfficiency and Accuracy of Importing HEC RAS Datafiles into PCSWMM and SWMM5
5 Efficiency and Accuracy of Importing HEC RAS Datafiles into PCSWMM and SWMM5 Karen Finney, Rob James, William James and Tiehong Xiao An advantage of USEPA s SWMM5 is its capability to dynamically model
More informationAutomating Hydraulic Analysis v 1.0.
2011 Automating Hydraulic Analysis v 1.0. Basic tutorial and introduction Automating Hydraulic Analysis (AHYDRA) is a freeware application that automates some specific features of HEC RAS or other hydraulic
More informationWMS 10.0 Tutorial Watershed Modeling MODRAT Interface Schematic Build a MODRAT model by defining a hydrologic schematic
v. 10.0 WMS 10.0 Tutorial Watershed Modeling MODRAT Interface Schematic Build a MODRAT model by defining a hydrologic schematic Objectives This tutorial shows users how to define a basic MODRAT model using
More informationThe HEC-RAS Model Refresher
The HEC-RAS Model Refresher Minmin Shu P.E. Transportation Review Unit Water Resources Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality 12-6-2018 What Does the HEC-RAS Mean RAS----River Analysis System
More informationWatershed Modeling Rational Method Interface. Learn how to model urban areas using WMS' rational method interface
v. 10.1 WMS 10.1 Tutorial Learn how to model urban areas using WMS' rational method interface Objectives Learn how to model urban areas using the Rational method, including how to compute rainfall intensity,
More informationBuild a MODRAT model by defining a hydrologic schematic
v. 11.0 WMS 11.0 Tutorial Build a MODRAT model by defining a hydrologic schematic Objectives Learn how to define a basic MODRAT model using the hydrologic schematic tree in WMS by building a tree and defining
More informationFlood Inundation Mapping using HEC-RAS
Flood Inundation Mapping using HEC-RAS Goodell, C. 1 ; Warren, C. 2 WEST Consultants, 2601 25 th St SE, Suite 450, Salem, OR 97302. Abstract Flood inundation mapping is an important tool for municipal
More informationPE Exam Review - Surveying Demonstration Problem Solutions
PE Exam Review - Surveying Demonstration Problem Solutions I. Demonstration Problem Solutions... 1. Circular Curves Part A.... Circular Curves Part B... 9 3. Vertical Curves Part A... 18 4. Vertical Curves
More informationPACIFIC CENTER Anaheim, California
HYDROLOGY REPORT PACIFIC CENTER Anaheim, California Prepared for Hines Company 4000 MacArthur Blvd. Suite 110 Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.313.2230 Prepared by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. 16795 Von Karman,
More informationUTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO
UTILITY REPORT FOR THORNTON SELF STORAGE THORNTON, COLORADO Prepared by: Bowman Consulting 63 Park Point Dr. Suite 1 Golden, CO 841 (33)-81-29 June 29, 215 Revised August 14, 215 CERTIFICATE SHEET DCB
More informationSMS v Weir Flow. SRH-2D Tutorial. Prerequisites. Requirements. Time. Objectives
SMS v. 12.2 SRH-2D Tutorial Objectives This tutorial demonstrates the process of using a weir boundary condition (BC) within SRH-2D to model an overflow weir near a bridge structure. The Simulations tutorial
More informationComparison of 1D and 2D Surface Water Models for Solid Waste Facilities. Garth R. Bowers, P.E., Carl E. Bueter, P.E., Larry Henk
Comparison of 1D and 2D Surface Water Models for Solid Waste Facilities Garth R. Bowers, P.E., Carl E. Bueter, P.E., Larry Henk Introduction Importance of Accurate Floodplain Delineation Required by Federal
More informationWMS 9.0 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HEC-RAS Analysis Learn how to setup a basic HEC-RAS analysis using WMS
v. 9.0 WMS 9.0 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HEC-RAS Analysis Learn how to setup a basic HEC-RAS analysis using WMS Objectives Learn how to build cross sections, stream centerlines, and bank
More informationGeorge Mason University Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering. Dr. Celso Ferreira Prepared by Lora Baumgartner
George Mason University Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering Dr. Celso Ferreira Prepared by Lora Baumgartner Exercise Topic: Getting started with HEC RAS Objective: Create
More informationStorm Drain Modeling HY-12 Rational Design
v. 10.1 WMS 10.1 Tutorial Learn how to design storm drain inlets, pipes, and other components of a storm drain system using FHWA's HY-12 storm drain analysis software and the WMS interface Objectives Define
More informationHarris County Flood Control District HEC-RAS 2D Modeling Guidelines (Standardizing HEC-RAS 2D Models for Submittal Within Harris County)
Harris County Flood Control District HEC-RAS 2D Modeling Guidelines (Standardizing HEC-RAS 2D Models for Submittal Within Harris County) Presented by: April 27, 2017 Matthew Zeve, P.E., CFM Harris County
More informationWMS 10.1 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HEC-RAS Analysis Learn how to setup a basic HEC-RAS analysis using WMS
v. 10.1 WMS 10.1 Tutorial Hydraulics and Floodplain Modeling HEC-RAS Analysis Learn how to setup a basic HEC-RAS analysis using WMS Objectives Learn how to build cross sections, stream centerlines, and
More informationRapid Floodplain Delineation. Presented by: Leo R. Kreymborg 1, P.E. David T. Williams 2, Ph.D., P.E. Iwan H. Thomas 3, E.I.T.
007 ASCE Rapid Floodplain Delineation Presented by: Leo R. Kreymborg 1, P.E. David T. Williams, Ph.D., P.E. Iwan H. Thomas 3, E.I.T. 1 Project Manager, PBS&J, 975 Sky Park Court, Suite 00, San Diego, CA
More informationVerification and Validation of HEC-RAS 5.1
Verification and Validation of HEC-RAS 5.1 Gary Brunner 1, P.E., D. WRE, M.ASCE Dr. Alex Sanchez 1 Dr. Tom Molls 2 Dr. David Parr 3 1. USACE Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CA 2. David Ford Consulting
More informationComparing 2D Approaches for Complex FEMA Studies
Comparing 2D Approaches for Complex FEMA Studies Presented by: Ted Cassidy, P.E., PH (STARR2-Dewberry) Sam Crampton, P.E., CFM (STARR2-Dewberry) Mike DePue, P.E., CFM (STARR2-Atkins) Agenda Introduction
More information2-D Hydraulic Modeling Theory & Practice
2-D Hydraulic Modeling Theory & Practice Author: Maged A. Aboelata, PhD, PE, CFM Presenter: Heather Zhao, PE, CFM October 2017 Presentation Outline * 1-D vs. 2-D modeling * Theory of 2-D simulation * Commonly
More information2014 AWRA Annual Water Resources Conference November 5, 2014 Tysons Corner, VA
2014 AWRA Annual Water Resources Conference November 5, 2014 Tysons Corner, VA HEC-RAS Overview, History, & Future How HEC-RAS Works Model Development Standard FEMA Assumptions Building A Model FEMA Levels
More informationTECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: COPIES: FROM: Connely Baldwin PacifiCorp Energy Hydro Resources NTO 11 File Craig Bagley, P.E. CFM, and Tyler Seamons, P.E. Bowen, Collins and Associates 154 E 14 South, Draper,
More informationFLOODPLAIN MODELING USING HEC-RAS
H A E S T A D M E T H O D S FLOODPLAIN MODELING USING HEC-RAS F i r s t E d i t i o n Authors Haestad Methods Gary Dyhouse Jennifer Hatchett Jeremy Benn Managing Editor Colleen Totz Editors David Klotz,
More informationComparing HEC-RAS v5.0 2-D Results with Verification Datasets
Comparing HEC-RAS v5.0 2-D Results with Verification Datasets Tom Molls 1, Gary Brunner 2, & Alejandro Sanchez 2 1. David Ford Consulting Engineers, Inc., Sacramento, CA 2. USACE Hydrologic Engineering
More informationHEC-22 Inlets in INFOSWMM and H2OMAP SWMM v12
HEC-22 Inlets in INFOSWMM and H2OMAP SWMM v12 Table of Contents How the Inlet and Overland Junctions are Defined 3 Why Would You Use the HEC-22 Inlets Option? 4 Types of Inlets 5 Nodes in InfoSWMM and
More informationHEC-RAS Verification and Validation Tests
HEC-RAS Verification and Validation Tests April 2018 Approved for Public Release. Distribution Unlimited. RD-52 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 The public reporting burden for
More informationHECRAS 2D: Are you ready for the revolution in the world of hydraulic modeling?
HECRAS 2D: Are you ready for the revolution in the world of hydraulic modeling? Rishab Mahajan, Emily Campbell and Matt Bardol March 8, 2017 Outline Reasons for hydraulic modeling 1D Modeling 2D Modeling-
More informationSMS v Culvert Structures. SRH-2D Tutorial. Prerequisites. Requirements. Time. Objectives
SMS v. 12.0 SRH-2D Tutorial Objectives This tutorial demonstrates the process of modeling culverts in SRH-2D. The Working with Simulations tutorial should have been completed before attempting this one.
More informationStorm Drain Modeling HY-12 Pump Station
v. 10.1 WMS 10.1 Tutorial Storm Drain Modeling HY-12 Pump Station Analysis Setup a simple HY-12 pump station storm drain model in the WMS interface with pump and pipe information Objectives Using the HY-12
More informationFloodplain Mapping & Hydraulic Analysis with HEC-GeoRAS and ArcGIS 9.1
Floodplain Mapping & Hydraulic Analysis with HEC-GeoRAS 4.1.1 and ArcGIS 9.1 Prepared by Sarah Meyer 1 and Francisco Olivera 2, Ph.D., P.E. May 2007 Contents: 1. Goals of Exercise & Additional Resources
More informationHEC-RAS 3.0 January, 2001 Release Notes
HEC-RAS 3.0 January, 2001 Release Notes A new version of HEC-RAS (3.0) has been released with significant new features over the previous version (2.21). Version 3.0 includes unsteady flow routing capabilities,
More informationH y d r o C A D. Owner's Manual
H y d r o C A D Stormwater Modeling System Version 8 Owner's Manual Copyright 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC. All rights reserved. HydroCAD is a registered trademark of HydroCAD Software Solutions
More informationFlood Control Structures Sometimes Neither Fish Nor Fowl
Proud Titanium Sponsor of the ASFPM 2016 Annual Conference Flood Control Structures Sometimes Neither Fish Nor Fowl David Rubenstein, CFM Jim Murphy, PE, CFM Agenda Approach Study Area Flood Control System
More informationUnderstanding Topographic Maps
Understanding Topographic Maps 1. Every point on a contour line represents the exact same elevation (remember the glass inserted into the mountain). As a result of this every contour line must eventually
More informationAutomated Enforcement of High Resolution Terrain Models April 21, Brian K. Gelder, PhD Associate Scientist Iowa State University
Automated Enforcement of High Resolution Terrain Models April 21, 2015 Brian K. Gelder, PhD Associate Scientist Iowa State University Problem Statement High resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) should
More informationThis loads a preset standard set of data appropriate for Malaysian modeling projects.
XP Software On-Site Detention (OSD) Example Step 1 Open xpswmm2010 program Or from Start menu select Programs XPS - then select xpswmm2010 Select Create From Template Save file, e.g. Filename.xp The program
More informationSoil Map Adams County Area, Parts of Adams and Denver Counties, Colorado ' 39''
Soil Map Adams County Area, Parts of Adams and Denver Counties, Colorado 4411660 4411670 4411680 4411690 4411700 4411710 4411720 4411730 104 58' 39'' W 4411660 4411670 4411680 4411690 4411700 4411710 4411720
More information4.2.3 MODEL DEVELOPMENT The study developed flood mitigation options for the Eltham Road and Madills Farm / Melanesia Road areas. However, as low levels of confidence were associated with the flood h azards
More informationISIS Free & ISIS Professional Quick Start Guide
ISIS Free & ISIS Professional Cost effective, integrated modelling solutions Think saving, think ISIS, think Halcrow This quick start guide enables first time users to quickly understand how to use ISIS
More informationBDCP Effects Analysis: 2D Hydrodynamic Modeling of the Fremont Weir Diversion Structure
Hydrology Hydraulics Geomorphology Design Field Services BDCP Effects Analysis: 2D Hydrodynamic Modeling of the Fremont Weir Diversion Structure Prepared for SAIC and the California Department of Water
More informationISIS 1D. Quick Start Guide. Cost effective, integrated software solutions ch2mhill.com/isis
ISIS 1D Quick Start Guide Cost effective, integrated software solutions 0845 094 7990 ch2mhill.com/isis softwaresupport@ch2m.com Table of Contents Overview... 3 1. Starting ISIS and Basic Concepts... 3
More informationProf. B.S. Thandaveswara. The computation of a flood wave resulting from a dam break basically involves two
41.4 Routing The computation of a flood wave resulting from a dam break basically involves two problems, which may be considered jointly or seperately: 1. Determination of the outflow hydrograph from the
More informationSMS v Culvert Structures with HY-8. Prerequisites. Requirements. Time. Objectives
SMS v. 12.1 SRH-2D Tutorial Culvert Structures with HY-8 Objectives This tutorial demonstrates the process of modeling culverts in SRH-2D coupled with the Federal Highway Administrations HY-8 culvert analysis
More informationWatershed Analysis Lab Heterogeneous, Gaged Watershed I (Northwest Branch)
Watershed Analysis Lab Heterogeneous, Gaged Watershed I (Northwest Branch) The previous lab demonstrated the process of selecting quadrangles, specifying data types, delineating a watershed, and using
More informationConnecting 1D and 2D Domains
Connecting 1D and 2D Domains XP Solutions has a long history of Providing original, high-performing software solutions Leading the industry in customer service and support Educating our customers to be
More informationSMS v D Summary Table. SRH-2D Tutorial. Prerequisites. Requirements. Time. Objectives
SMS v. 12.3 SRH-2D Tutorial Objectives Learn the process of making a summary table to compare the 2D hydraulic model results with 1D hydraulic model results. This tutorial introduces a method of presenting
More informationSteady Flow Water Surface Profile Computation Using HEC-RAS
Steady Flow Water Surface Profile Computation Using HEC-RAS Objectives The objective of the course is to enable the participants to perform water surface profile computations using computer program HEC-RAS
More informationDocumentation for Velocity Method Segment Generator Glenn E. Moglen February 2005 (Revised March 2005)
Documentation for Velocity Method Segment Generator Glenn E. Moglen February 2005 (Revised March 2005) The purpose of this document is to provide guidance on the use of a new dialog box recently added
More information2015 HDR, all rights reserved.
2015 HDR, all rights reserved. An Alternative to HEC-GEORAS: Overview & Comparison of AutoCAD River & Flood Analysis Module Ron Branyon, PE, CFM George Doubleday, EIT, CFM Brandon Hilbrich, PE, CFM TFMA
More informationApplication Description
USER S GUIDE FOR SDB GUI (SDB-J) Modifications by Janice Sylvestre Based on NWS Document THE NWS SIMPLIFIED DAM-BREAK FLOOD FORECASTING MODEL 1 By Danny L. Fread, Janice M. Lewis, and Stephen M. Wiele
More informationEnvironmental Impact Questionnaire
Community Development Department 11 English Street Petaluma, CA 94952 Phone: 707-778-4301 Email: cdd@ci.petaluma.ca.us Web: www.cityofpetaluma.net/cdd Building Geographic Information Systems Housing Neighborhood
More informationTHE NWS SIMPLIFIED DAM-BREAK FLOOD FORECASTING MODEL
THE NWS SIMPLIFIED DAM-BREAK FLOOD FORECASTING MODEL by Jonathan N. Wetmore and Danny L. Fread 1 (Revised 12/18/91) by Danny L. Fread, Janice M. Lewis 2, and Stephen M. Wiele 2 SYNOPSIS The National Weather
More informationGeneral Applications
Chapter General Applications The general analysis modules can be used to calculate section properties, wind pressures on buildings and evaluate drainage systems of building roofs. General Applications
More informationBentley OpenRoads Workshop 2017 FLUG Fall Training Event
Bentley OpenRoads Workshop 2017 FLUG Fall Training Event F-1P - Designing with a Pond Bentley Systems, Incorporated 685 Stockton Drive Exton, PA 19341 www.bentley.com Practice Workbook This workbook is
More informationUse of measured and interpolated crosssections
Use of measured and interpolated crosssections in hydraulic river modelling Y. Chen/, R. Crowded & R. A. Falconer^ ^ Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University ofbradford, Bradford, West
More informationFloodplain Engineering
Floodplain Engineering by David E. Fantina, PE Introduction: This course presents a discussion of the modeling procedure for flood profiling. The most commonly used software for flood profiling is the
More informationEvaluating Multiple Stormwater Analysis and Design Alternatives with StormCAD
Evaluating Multiple Stormwater Analysis and Design Alternatives with StormCAD Workshop Overview In this workshop you will use StormCAD to analyze an existing storm sewer system. You will add a parking
More informationDay 1. HEC-RAS 1-D Training. Rob Keller and Mark Forest. Break (9:45 am to 10:00 am) Lunch (12:00 pm to 1:00 pm)
Day 1 HEC-RAS 1-D Training Rob Keller and Mark Forest Introductions and Course Objectives (8:00 am to 8:15 am) Introductions: Class and Content Module 1 Open Channel Hydraulics (8:15 am to 9:45 am) Lecture
More informationBoundaries of 1D 2D modelling. Suzanne Callaway Senior Hydraulic Modeller
Boundaries of 1D 2D modelling Suzanne Callaway Senior Hydraulic Modeller Introduction Why is it important to define 1D 2D boundaries carefully? Defining boundaries between 1D and 2D models (Flood Modeller
More informationHysteresis in River Discharge Rating Curves. Histerésis en las curvas de gasto en ríos (caudal/calado) Madrid, March 25, 2013
Hysteresis in River Discharge Rating Curves Histerésis en las curvas de gasto en ríos (caudal/calado) Madrid, March 25, 2013 Marian Muste and Kyutae Lee IIHR Hydroscience & Engineering The University of
More informationBuilding a new model in wspg2010
Building a new model in wspg2010 The Water Surface Profile Gradient 2010 (wspg2010 by XP Software) model is a hydraulic analysis system that computes and plots uniform and non-uniform steady flow water
More informationAppendix H Drainage Ditch Design - Lab TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H... 2
Appendix H Drainage Ditch Design - Lab TABLE OF CONTENTS APPENDIX H... 2 H.1 Ditch Design... 2 H.1.1 Introduction... 2 H.1.2 Link/Ditch Configuration... 2 H.2 Lab 19: Ditch Design... 3 H.2.1 Introduction...
More informationRequired: 486DX-33, 8MB RAM, HDD w. 20 MB free, VGA, Win95. Recommended: Pentium 60, 16 MB RAM, SVGA, Win95 or NT
Evaluation Form Evaluator Information Name: Jeff Hagan Date: Feb. 17, 2000 Software Information Title of Software: Purpose: Publisher: CulvertMaster Culvert Hydraulic Design Haestad Methods, Inc. Version:
More information1.0 INTRODUCTION. Subject: Peaking Analysis
Memo Date: Friday, Project: NorthWestern Energy Operations Modeling of Hydros To: John Vandaveer, NorthWestern Energy From: Rick Miller, HDR Subject: Peaking Analysis 1.0 INTRODUCTION The goal of this
More informationRESCDAM DEVELOPMENT OF RESCUE ACTIONS BASED ON DAM BREAK FLOOD ANALYSI A PREVENTION PROJECT UNDER THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMME
RESCDAM DEVELOPMENT OF RESCUE ACTIONS BASED ON DAM BREAK FLOOD ANALYSI A PREVENTION PROJECT UNDER THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMME 1-DIMENSIONAL FLOW SIMULATIONS FOR THE KYRKÖSJÄRVI DAM BREAK HAZARD
More informationKaren O. Zwolak Tampa Electric Company 702 N. Franklin Street Tampa, FL
5012 W. Lemon Street Tampa, Florida 33609 Ph 813.944.3464 Fax 813.944.4959 December 31, 2015 (via email) Karen O. Zwolak Tampa Electric Company 702 N. Franklin Street Tampa, FL 33602 kozwolak@tecoenergy.com
More informationModeling Storm Sewer Networks in the City of Newport News, Virginia Using Two Different Software Solutions
Modeling Storm Sewer Networks in the City of Newport News, Virginia Using Two Different Software Solutions Mid-Atlantic Chapter APWA Annual Conference May 9 th, 2013 Overview + Storm Water Modeling Basics
More informationSiphoniTec. User s Guide
SiphoniTec A Siphonic Roof Drainage Design Utility The Level Approach to Roof Drainage User s Guide Release 2.0 RAINWATER MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS 1260 West Riverside Drive Salem, Virginia 24153 Telephone:
More informationv. 9.1 WMS 9.1 Tutorial Watershed Modeling HEC-1 Interface Learn how to setup a basic HEC-1 model using WMS
v. 9.1 WMS 9.1 Tutorial Learn how to setup a basic HEC-1 model using WMS Objectives Build a basic HEC-1 model from scratch using a DEM, land use, and soil data. Compute the geometric and hydrologic parameters
More informationEngineering Geology. Engineering Geology is backbone of civil engineering. Topographic Maps. Eng. Iqbal Marie
Engineering Geology Engineering Geology is backbone of civil engineering Topographic Maps Eng. Iqbal Marie Maps: are a two dimensional representation, of an area or region. There are many types of maps,
More informationSurveys and Maps for Drainage Design
Surveys and Maps for Drainage Design SURVEY TYPES BENCH LEVEL Survey Used to determine the elevation of a point (1-D) PROFILE Survey Used to determine the elevations of a line (2-D) TOPOGRAPHIC Survey
More informationSMS v Obstructions. SRH-2D Tutorial. Prerequisites. Requirements. Time. Objectives
SMS v. 12.1 SRH-2D Tutorial Objectives This tutorial demonstrates the process of creating and defining in-stream obstructions within an SRH-2D model. The SRH-2D Simulations tutorial should have been completed
More informationHydrologic Modeling using HEC-HMS
Hydrologic Modeling using HEC-HMS CE 412/512 Spring 2017 Introduction The intent of this exercise is to introduce you to the structure and some of the functions of the HEC-Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS),
More informationInitial Analysis of Natural and Anthropogenic Adjustments in the Lower Mississippi River since 1880
Richard Knox CE 394K Fall 2011 Initial Analysis of Natural and Anthropogenic Adjustments in the Lower Mississippi River since 1880 Objective: The objective of this term project is to use ArcGIS to evaluate
More information