ROUTING CONSORTIUM TEST SUITE
|
|
- Ira McDonald
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ROUTING CONSORTIUM TEST SUITE Border Gateway Protocol 4+ Over Internet Protocol Version 6 Multi-System Interoperability Test Suite Technical Document Version 2.1 University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH Routing Consortium Phone: Fax: University of New Hampshire.
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... i MODIFICATION RECORD... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... iii INTRODUCTION... iv TEST ORGANIZATION... v REFERENCES... vi Test BGP4+_INTEROP.1.1: Transit-AS, External BGP peers... 1 Test BGP4+_INTEROP.1.2: Non-Transit-AS, External BGP Peers... 4 Test BGP4+_INTEROP.1.3: Internal and External BGP Peers... 8 Test BGP4+_INTEROP.1.4: Internal BGP Peers ROUTING CONSORTIUM i BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
3 MODIFICATION RECORD Version 2.1 June 22, 2010 Added a third interoperability partner to test case 1.1 and 1.2. Traceroutes only needed to test transit and non-transit. Removed extraneous traceroutes. Added test cases to 1.2 for non-transit test cases. Changed focus of 1.3 to External and Internal BGP Peers. Changed focus of 1.4 to Internal BGP Peers. Version 2.0 March 2, 2006 Re-worded test procedures. Re-numbered test 2.1 and test 2.2 to test 1.3 and test 1.4 respectively Changed the RUT to be in AS 1 in test 1.2 and test 1.4 Version 1.1 June 17, 2005 Re-worded test procedures. Re-ordered observable results. Changed TR3 to be TR2 in step 6 of test 2.2 Version 1.0 March 14, 2005 Removed TR5 from Test 2.1, and 2.2 Added updated pictures to the Test Suite. Changed the names of the Test Routers and Test Nodes in all tests. Version 0.2 June 10, 2004 Tests 2.1 and 2.2, added configuration on the RUT to include setting next-hop to self for internal peers. Version 0.1 August 7, 2003 Initial Version ROUTING CONSORTIUM ii BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The University of New Hampshire would like to acknowledge the efforts of the following individuals in the development of this test suite: Ethan Burns Eric Barrett Andrew Gadzik Sagun Shakya Timothy Winters Fanny Xu University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire ROUTING CONSORTIUM iii BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
5 INTRODUCTION Overview The University of New Hampshire s (UNH-IOL) is an institution designed to improve the interoperability of standards based products by providing an environment where a product can be tested against other implementations of a standard. This suite of tests has been developed to help implementers evaluate the functionality of their BGP4+ based products. This test suite has been designed to test interoperability of the device under test with other BGP4+ capable devices. This test suite focuses on testing configurations of the network that could cause problems when deployed if the device under test does not operate properly with the devices that it is connected to. The tests do not determine if a product conforms to the BGP4+ standard but they are designed as interoperability tests. These tests provide one method to isolate problems within the BGP4+ capable device that will affect the interoperability performance. Successful completion of all tests contained in this suite does not guarantee that the tested device will operate with other BGP4+ capable devices. However, these tests do provide a reasonable level of confidence that the RUT will function well in most BGP4+ environment. Abbreviations and Acronyms Acronyms used in this Test Suite: N: Network RUT: Router Under Test TR: Testing Router TN: Testing Node AS: Autonomous System ASN: Autonomous System Number When several entities of the same type are present in a test configuration, a number is appended to the acronym to yield a label for each entity. For example, if there were three testing routers in the test configuration, they would be labeled TR1, TR2 and TR3. Drawing conventions External BGP connection: Internal BGP connection: ROUTING CONSORTIUM iv BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
6 TEST ORGANIZATION This document organizes tests by group based on related test methodology or goals. Each group begins with a brief set of comments pertaining to all tests within that group. This is followed by a series of description blocks; each block describes a single test. The format of the description block is as follows: Test Label: Purpose: References: Resource Requirements: Discussion: Test Setup: Procedure: Observable Results: Possible Problems: The test label and title comprise the first line of the test block. The test label is composed by concatenating the short test suite name, the group number, and the test number within the group, separated by periods. The Test Number is the group and test number, also separated by a period. So, test label BGP4+_INTEROP.1.2 refers to the second test of the first test group in the BGP4+ InterOperability suite. The test number is 1.2. The Purpose is a short statement describing what the test attempts to achieve. It is usually phrased as a simple assertion of the feature or capability to be tested. The References section lists cross-references to the specifications and documentation that might be helpful in understanding and evaluating the test and results. The Resource Requirements section specifies the software, hardware, and test equipment that will be needed to perform the test. The Discussion is a general discussion of the test and relevant section of the specification, including any assumptions made in the design or implementation of the test as well as known limitations. The Test Setup section describes the configuration of all devices prior to the start of the test. Different parts of the procedure may involve configuration steps that deviate from what is given in the test setup. If a value is not provided for a protocol parameter, then the protocol s default is used for that parameter. This section of the test description contains the step-by-step instructions for carrying out the test. These steps include such things as enabling interfaces, unplugging devices from the network, or sending packet from a test station. The test procedure also cues the tester to make observations, which are interpreted in accordance with the observable results given for that test part. This section lists observable results that can be examined by the tester to verify that the RUT is operating properly. When multiple observable results are possible, this section provides a short discussion on how to interpret them. The determination of a pass or fail for each test is usually based on how the RUT s behavior compares to the results described in this section. This section contains a description of known issues with the test procedure, which may affect test results in certain situations. ROUTING CONSORTIUM v BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
7 REFERENCES The following documents are referenced in this text: [RFC 4760] Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4, Request for Comments 4760 ROUTING CONSORTIUM vi BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
8 Test BGP4+_INTEROP.1.1: Transit-AS, External BGP peers Purpose: To verify that a transit-as BGP4+ router correctly communicates routes to other external BGP4+ router peers. References: [RFC 4760] Section 3 Resource Requirements: Utility Program: traceroute Discussion: This test verifies that the RUT can successfully communicate route information to other external BGP4+ router peers. An AS is called transit if it carries any traffic that neither originates nor terminates at that AS, while an AS is called non-transit if it only carries traffic that either originates or terminates at that AS. The RUT resides in a transit AS since the AS carries transit traffic in some cases. Test Setup: Configure the RUT to be external peers with TR1, TR2 and TR3. Configure TR1 and TR2 to be external peers. Configure TR2 and TR3 to be external peers. Procedure: Part A: External BGP Peer Establishments ROUTING CONSORTIUM 1 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
9 1. TR1 and TR2 are not configured as external peers. 2. TR2 and TR3 are not configured as external peers. 3. Disable TR3. 4. Perform a traceroute from TN2 to TN3. 5. Observe the traffic on all networks. 6. Enable TR3. Disable TR1. 7. Perform a traceroute from TN4 to TN3. 8. Observe the traffic on all networks. Part B: External BGP Peer Establishment, Shorter AS Path 9. Disable TR Perform a traceroute from TN2 to TN Observe traffic on all networks. 12. Enable TR3. Disable TR Perform a traceroute from TN4 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part C: Accepting AS Path Change 15. Disable TR Configure TR2 to prepend its own AS number three times on outgoing UPDATES to TR Perform a traceroute from TN2 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 19. Enable TR3. Disable TR Configure TR2 to prepend its own AS number three times outgoing UPDATES to TR Perform a traceroute from TN4 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part D: Advertising AS Path Change 23. Disable TR Configure TR2 to prepend its own AS number three times on outgoing UPDATES to TR Configure the RUT to prepend its own AS number four times on outgoing UPDATES to TR Perform a traceroute from TN4 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 28. Enable TR3. Disable TR Configure TR2 to prepend its own AS number three times on outgoing UPDATES to TR Configure the RUT to prepend its own AS number four times on outgoing UPDATES to TR Perform a traceroute from TN4 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part E: External BGP Peer Removal 33. Disable TR Configure TR1 to disable TR2 as its peer. 35. Perform a traceroute from TN2 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 37. Enable TR3. Disable TR Configure TR3 to disable TR2 as its peer. 39. Perform a traceroute from TN4 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part F: External BGP Peer Reestablishment 41. Disable TR Configure TR1 to disable TR2 as its peer. 43. Perform a traceroute from TN2 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. ROUTING CONSORTIUM 2 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
10 45. Configure TR1 and TR2 to be peers. 46. Perform a traceroute from TN2 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 48. Enable TR3. Disable TR Configure TR3 to disable TR2 as its peer. 50. Perform a traceroute from TN4 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks 52. Configure TR3 and TR2 to be peers. 53. Perform a traceroute from TN4 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Observable Results: In Part A, traceroute results should be as follows: Step 5: TN2->TR1->RUT->TR2->TN3 Step 8: TN4->TR3->RUT->TR2->TN3 In Part B, traceroute results should be as follows: Step 11: TN2->TR1->TR2->TN3 Step 14: TN4->TR3->TR2->TN3 In Part C, traceroute results should be as follows: Step 18: TN2->TR1->RUT->TR2->TN3 Step 22: TN4->TR3->RUT->TR2->TN3 In Part D, traceroute results should be as follows: Step 27: TN2->TR1->TR2->TN3 Step 32: TN4->TR3->TR2->TN3 In Part E, traceroute results should be as follows: Step 36: TN2->TR1->RUT->TR2->TN3 Step 40: TN4->TR3->RUT->TR2->TN3 In Part F, traceroute results should be as follows: Step 44: TN2->TR1->RUT->TR2->TN3 Step 47: TN2->TR1->TR2->TN3 Step 51: TN4->TR3->RUT->TR2->TN3 Step 54: TN4->TR3->TR2->TN3 Possible Problems: None ROUTING CONSORTIUM 3 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
11 Test BGP4+_INTEROP.1.2: Non-Transit-AS, External BGP Peers Purpose: To verify that a non-transit-as BGP4+ router correctly communicates routes to other external BGP4+ router peers. References: [RFC 4760] Section 3 Resource Requirements: Utility Program: traceroute Discussion: This test verifies that the RUT can successfully communicate route information to other external BGP4+ router peers. An AS is called transit if it carries any traffic that neither originates nor terminates at that AS, while an AS is called non-transit if it only carries traffic that either originates or terminates at that AS. The RUT resides in a non-transit AS since the AS doesn t carry transit traffic in this test at all. Test Setup: Configure the RUT to be external peers with TR1,TR2 and TR3. Configure TR1 and TR2 to be external peers. Configure TR2 and TR3 to be external peers. Procedure: Part A: External BGP Peer Establishments ROUTING CONSORTIUM 4 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
12 1. Disable TR3. 2. The RUT and TR2 are not configured as external peers. 3. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN2. 4. Observe the traffic on all networks. 5. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN3. 6. Observe the traffic on all networks. 7. Enable TR3. Disable TR1. 8. Configure the RUT to be peers with TR3. 9. Configure TR3 and TR2 to be peers. 10. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 12. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part B: External BGP Peer Establishment, Shorter AS Path 14. Disable TR Perform traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe traffic on all networks. 17. Perform traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe traffic on all networks. 19. Enable TR3. Disable TR Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe traffic on all networks. 22. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part C: Accepting AS Path Change 24. Disable TR Configure TR1 to prepend its own AS number three times on outgoing UPDATES to the RUT. 26. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 28. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 30. Enable TR3. Disable TR Configure TR3 to prepend its own AS number three times on outgoing UPDATES to the RUT. 32. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 34. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part D: Advertising AS Path Change 36. Disable TR Configure RUT to prepend its own AS number three times on outgoing UPDATES to TR Perform a traceroute from TN2 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 40. Perform a traceroute from TN3 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 42. Enable TR3. Disable TR Configure RUT to prepend its own AS number three times on outgoing UPDATES to TR Perform a traceroute from TN4 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 46. Perform a traceroute from TN3 to TN1. ROUTING CONSORTIUM 5 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
13 47. Observe the traffic on all networks. Part E: External BGP Peer Removal 48. Disable TR Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 51. Configure TR1 to disable RUT as its peer. 52. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 54. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 56. Enable TR3. Disable TR Configure TR3 to be peers with the RUT. 58. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 60. Configure TR3 to disable RUT as its peer. 61. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 63. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part F: External BGP Peer Reestablishment 65. Disable TR Configure RUT to disable TR1 as its peer. 67. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 69. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 71. Configure the RUT and TR1 to be peers. 72. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 74. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 76. Enable TR3. Disable TR Configure RUT to disable TR3 as its peer. 78. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 80. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 82. Configure the RUT and TR1 to be peers. 83. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 85. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Observable Results: In Part A, traceroute results are as follows: Step 4: TN1->RUT->TR1->TN2. Step 6: TN1->RUT->TR1->TR2->TN3. Step 11: TN1->RUT->TR3->TN4. ROUTING CONSORTIUM 6 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
14 Step 13: TN1->RUT->TR3->TR2->TN3. In Part B, traceroute results are as follows: Step 16: TN1->RUT->TR1->TN2. Step 18: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. Step 21: TN1->RUT->TR3->TN4. Step 23: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. In Part C, traceroute results are as follows: Step 27: TN1->RUT->TR2->TR1->TN2. Step 29: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. Step 33: TN1->RUT->TR2->TR3->TN4. Step 35: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. In Part D, traceroute results are as follows: Step 39: TN2->TR1->TR2->RUT->TN1. Step 41: TN3->TR2->RUT->TN1. Step 45: TN4->TR3->TR2->RUT->TN1. Step 47: TN3->TR2->RUT->TN1. In Part E, traceroute results are as follows: Step 50: TN1->RUT->TR1->TN2. Step 53: TN1->RUT->TR2->TR1->TN2. Step 55: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. Step 59: TN1->RUT->TR3->TN4. Step 62: TN1->RUT->TR2->TR3->TN4. Step 64: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. In Part F, traceroute results are as follows: Step 68: TN1->RUT->TR2->TR1->TN2. Step 70: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. Step 73: TN1->RUT->TR1->TN2. Step 75: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. Step 79: TN1->RUT->TR2->TR3->TN4. Step 81: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. Step 84: TN1->RUT->TR3->TN4. Step 86: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3. Possible Problems: None ROUTING CONSORTIUM 7 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
15 Test BGP4+_INTEROP.1.3: Internal and External BGP Peers Purpose: To verify that a BGP4+ router correctly communicates routes to other external and internal BGP4+ router peers. References: [RFC 4760] Section 3 Resource Requirements: Utility Program: traceroute Discussion: This test verifies that the RUT can successfully communicate route information to other internal and external BGP4+ router peers. An AS is called transit if it carries any traffic that neither originates nor terminates at that AS, while an AS is called non-transit if it only carries traffic that either originates or terminates at that AS. The RUT resides in a transit AS since the AS carries transit traffic in some cases. Test Setup: Configure the following configurations for Parts B thru E. The RUT should be configured as next-hop self for all neighbors. Configure the RUT to be external peers with TR1 and TR2. Configure the TR1 and TR2 to external peers. Procedure: Part A: Internal and External BGP Peer Establishments 1. The RUT and TR2 are not configured as external peers. 2. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN2. 3. Observe the traffic on all networks. 4. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN3. 5. Observe the traffic on all networks. Part B: External BGP Peer Establishment, Shorter AS Path ROUTING CONSORTIUM 8 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
16 6. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN2. 7. Observe the traffic on all networks. 8. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN3. 9. Observe the traffic on all networks. Part C: Advertising AS Path Change 10. Configure the RUT to prepend its own AS number three times on outgoing UPDATES to TR Perform a traceroute from TN2 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 13. Perform a traceroute from TN3 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part D: Accepting AS Path Change 15. Configure TR2 to prepend its own AS number three times on outgoing UPDATES to RUT. 16. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 18. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Part E: External BGP Peer Removal 20. Configure RUT to disable TR2 as its peer. 21. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. 23. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN Observe the traffic on all networks. Observable Result: In Part A, traceroute results are as follows: TN1->TR3->RUT->TR1->TN2 TN1->TR3->RUT->TR1->TR2->TN3 In Part B, traceroute results are as follows: TN1->TR3->RUT->TR1->TN2 TN1->TR3->RUT->TR2->TN3 In Part C, traceroute results are as follows: TN2->TR1->RUT->TR3->TN1 TN3->TR2->TR1->RUT->TR3->TN1 In Part D, traceroute results are as follows: TN1->TR3->RUT->TR1->TN2 TN1->TR3->RUT->TR1->TR2->TN3 In Part E, traceroute results are as follows: TN1->TR3->RUT->TR1->TN2 TN1->TR3->RUT->TR2->TN3 Possible Problems: None ROUTING CONSORTIUM 9 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
17 Test BGP4+_INTEROP.1.4: Internal BGP Peers Purpose: To verify that a BGP4+ router correctly communicates routes to other internal BGP4+ router peers. References: [RFC 4760] Section 3 Resource Requirements: Utility Program: traceroute Discussion: This test verifies that the RUT can successfully communicate route information to other internal and external BGP4+ router peers. An AS is called transit if it carries any traffic that neither originates nor terminates at that AS, while an AS is called non-transit if it only carries traffic that either originates or terminates at that AS. The RUT resides in a non-transit AS since the AS doesn t carry transit traffic in this test at all. Test Setup: Configure the RUT to be internal peers with TR3 and TR2. Configure TR3 and TR2 to be internal peers. Configure TR1 and TR2 to external peers. Procedure: Part A: Internal BGP Peer Establishments 1. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN3. 2. Observe the traffic on all networks. Part B: Internal to External 3. Perform a traceroute from TN1 to TN2. 4. Observe the traffic on all networks. Observable Results: In Part A, traceroute results are as follows: TN1->RUT->TR2->TN3 ROUTING CONSORTIUM 10 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
18 In Part B, traceroute results are as follows: TN1->RUT->TR2->TR1->TN2 Possible Problems: None ROUTING CONSORTIUM 11 BGP4+ Interoperability Test Suite
ROUTING CONSORTIUM. Routing Information Protocol Version 2 (RIP) Multi-System Interoperability Test Suite. Technical Document. Revision 2.
ROUTING CONSORTIUM Routing Information Protocol Version 2 (RIP) Multi-System Interoperability Test Suite Technical Document Revision 2.2 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 Routing Consortium
More informationROUTING CONSORTIUM. Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Multi-System Interoperability Test Suite. Technical Document. Revision 1.6
ROUTING CONSORTIUM Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Multi-System Interoperability Test Suite Technical Document Revision 1.6 University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824-3525
More informationROUTING CONSORTIUM. Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol Version 3 Interoperability Test Suite. Technical Document. Draft Version
ROUTING CONSORTIUM Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol Version 3 Interoperability Test Suite Technical Document Draft Version 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 Routing Consortium Phone: +1-603-862-3941
More informationROUTING CONSORTIUM. Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) NSSA Option Test Suite. Technical Document. Revision 1.9
ROUTING CONSORTIUM Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) NSSA Option Test Suite Technical Document Revision 1.9 University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824-3525 Routing Consortium
More informationIPv6 Application Test Service
IPv6 Application Test Service Generic IPv6 Application Functional Test Plan Technical Document Version 0.1 University of New Hampshire 21 Madbury Road, Suite 100 Durham, NH 03824 IPv6 Application Test
More informationIPv6 CONSORTIUM TEST SUITE Address Architecture Conformance Test Specification
IPv6 CONSORTIUM TEST SUITE Address Architecture Technical Document Version 2.4 University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 IPv6 Consortium Phone: +1-603-862-2804 http://www.iol.unh.edu
More informationROUTING CONSORTIUM. Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol Operations Test Suite. Technical Document. Revision 2.5
ROUTING CONSORTIUM Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol Operations Test Suite Technical Document Revision 2.5 University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 Routing Consortium
More informationROUTING CONSORTIUM TEST SUITE
ROUTING CONSORTIUM TEST SUITE Routing Information Protocol (RIP) Over Internet Protocol Version 6 Technical Document Version 2.0 University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824
More informationROUTING CONSORTIUM. Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Operations Test Suite. Technical Document. Revision 4.6
ROUTING CONSORTIUM Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Operations Test Suite Technical Document Revision 4.6 University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824-3525
More informationIP CONSORTIUM TEST SUITE Internet Protocol, Version 6
IP CONSORTIUM TEST SUITE Internet Protocol, Version 6 Technical Document Last Update: January 25, 2002 Internet Protocol Consortium 7 Leavitt Lane, Room 106 Durham, NH 03824-3525 Research Computing Center
More informationEthernet Switching Protocols
Ethernet Switching Protocols Link Layer Discovery Protocol Interoperability Test Suite Version 1.0 Last Updated: June 13, 2016 Ethernet Switching Protocols UNH Improving networks worldwide. 21 Madbury
More informationBridge Functions Consortium
Hardware Rate Limiting Feature Verification Test Suite Version 0.1 Last Updated: 2005-09-05 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 Phone: (603) 862-0090 www.iol.unh.edu
More informationBridge Functions Consortium. Bridge Functions Consortium
Link Aggregation Interoperability Test Suite Version 2.2 2.6 Last Updated: 2008-08-04 University of New Hampshire www.iol.unh.edu 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 Phone: +1-603-862-0090 Fax:
More informationIWARP Consortium. Network Impairments Test Suite. Technical Document. Revision 0.3
IWARP Consortium Technical Document Revision 0.3 iwarp Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 3525 University of New Hampshire Phone: +1 603 862 5083 Fax: +1 603 862 4181 http://www.iol.unh.edu/
More informationOSPF NSSA Operations Test Report Revision 1.7. InterOperability Lab 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham NH,
IPv4 CONSORTIUM OSPF NSSA Operations Test Report Revision 1.7 InterOperability Lab 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham NH, 03824 +1-603-862-3941 Consortium Managers: Erica Williamsen Timothy Winters ericaw@iol.unh.edu
More informationFast Ethernet Consortium
Fast Ethernet Consortium Version 1.2 Technical Document Last Updated: March 6, 2015 Fast Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 University of New Hampshire Phone: (603) 862-1529
More informationData Center Bridging Consortium
Data Center Bridging Consortium 802.1Qaz Enhanced Transmission Selection Test Suite Version 1.2 Technical Document Last Updated: April 10th, 2012 Data Center Bridging Consortium HTTP://WWW.IOL.UNH.EDU/CONSORTIUMS/DCB
More informationETHERNET TESTING SERVICES
ETHERNET TESTING SERVICES MAC Merge Frame Preemption for Interspersing Express Traffic Conformance Test Plan Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: June 14, 2017 Ethernet Testing Services 21 Madbury
More informationBridge Functions Consortium
Bridge Functions Consortium Spanning Tree Protocol Operations Test Suite Version 2.4 Last Updated: 2008-06-23 Bridge Functions Consortium University of New Hampshire www.iol.unh.edu 121 Technology Drive,
More informationUniversity of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Ethernet Consortium
University of New Hampshire Ethernet Consortium As of August 23 rd, 2002 the Ethernet Consortium Clause # 28 Auto Negotiation Next Page Exchange Conformance Test Suite version 2.0 has been superseded by
More informationBridge Functions Consortium
Quality/Class of Service Conformance Test Suite Version 0.3 Last Updated: 2005-09-23 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 Phone: (603) 862-0090 www.iol.unh.edu Fax:
More informationBridge Functions Consortium
Version 2.2 Last Modified: 2005-01-20 University of New Hampshire esearch Computing Center 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 Phone: (603) 862-0090 Fax: (603) 862-4181 www.iol.unh.edu 2005
More informationUNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM
UNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM Interoperability Test Suite Version 1.2 Technical Document Last Updated January 4, 2007 2006 University of New Hampshire UNH-IOL iscsi Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2
More informationUniversity of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Ethernet Consortium
Ethernet Consortium As of November 7 th, 2001 the Ethernet Consortium Clause # 28 Auto Negotiation Next Page Exchange Conformance Test Suite version 1.0 has been superseded by the release of the Clause
More informationETHERNET. Clause 28 Auto-Negotiation Next Page Exchange Test Suite v2.3. Technical Document. Last Updated: Friday, February 03, :22 AM
ETHERNET Clause 28 Auto-Negotiation Next Page Exchange Test Suite v2.3 Technical Document Last Updated: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:22 AM University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham,
More informationEthernet. MDIO Auto-Negotiation Registers Test Suite For Twisted-Pair PHYs V1.0. Technical Document. Last Updated: Thursday March 19, :21 AM
Ethernet MDIO Auto-Negotiation Registers Test Suite V1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: Thursday March 19, 2015 10:21 AM University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 10
More informationUniversity of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Ethernet Consortia
University of New Hampshire Ethernet Consortia As of February 3, 2006 the Ethernet Clause 28 Management System Test Suite version 2.5 has been superseded by the release of version 2.6. This document along
More informationRIPv2 Interoperability Test Report Revision 1.1
IPv4 CONSORTIUM RIPv2 Interoperability Test Report Revision 1.1 InterOperability Lab 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham NH, 03824 +1-603-862-3941 Consortium Manager: Erica Williamsen ericaw@iol.unh.edu
More informationAUTOMOTIVE ETHERNET CONSORTIUM
AUTOMOTIVE ETHERNET CONSORTIUM Clause 96 100BASE-T1 PHY Control Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: March 9, 2016 Automotive Ethernet Consortium 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100 Durham, NH
More informationEthernet. Clause 40 Auto-Crossover Test Suite v1.6. Technical Document. Last Updated: December 22, 2005, 11:07 a.m.
Ethernet Clause 40 Auto-Crossover Test Suite v1.6 Technical Document Last Updated: December 22, 2005, 11:07 a.m. Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 Research Computing Center
More informationUNH-IOL FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM
UNH-IOL FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM Multi Target Fabric Interoperability Test Suite Version 1.2 Technical Document Last Updated: November 29, 2006 Copyright 2006 University of New Hampshire InterOperability
More informationEthernet. Clause 40 Auto-Crossover Test Suite V2.2. Technical Document. Last Updated: March 24, 2009, 3:15 p.m.
Ethernet Clause 40 Auto-Crossover Test Suite V2.2 Technical Document Last Updated: March 24, 2009, 3:15 p.m. Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 University of New Hampshire
More informationData Center Bridging Consortium
Data Center Bridging Consortium 802.1Qau Congestion Notification Test Suite Version 1.1 Technical Document Last Updated: April 10, 2012 Data Center Bridging Consortium HTTP://WWW.IOL.UNH.EDU/CONSORTIUMS/DCB
More informationUNH-IOL PCIe CONSORTIUM
UNH-IOL PCIe CONSORTIUM PCIe Interoperability Test Suite v1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: September 26, 2013 2013 University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory UNH IOL PCIe Consortium 121
More informationUNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM
UNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM Interoperability Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated December 1, 2005 2005 University of New Hampshire UNH-IOL iscsi Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2
More informationUniversity of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Ethernet in the First Mile Consortium
University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory As of July 26, 2004 the Ethernet in the First Mile Clause 57 OAM Conformance Test Suite version 0.4 has been superseded by the release of the Clause
More informationEthernet. Clause 22, 28, and 40 Management Registers Test Suite V4.0. Technical Document. Last Updated: Monday, March 9, :15 PM
Ethernet Clause 22, 28, and 40 Management Registers Test Suite V4.0 Technical Document Last Updated: Monday, March 9, 2015 2:15 PM University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824
More informationUniversity of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Ethernet Consortium
University of New Hampshire Ethernet Consortium As of July 2 nd, 2001 the Ethernet Consortium Clause # 28 Auto Negotiation State Machine Base Page Exchange Conformance Test Suite version 4.0.3 has been
More informationUNH-IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM
UNH-IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM isns Interoperability Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: July 21, 2008 iscsi Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 University of New Hampshire
More informationUNH-IOL FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM
UNH-IOL FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM Fabric Build Interoperability Test Suite Version 2.11 Technical Document Last Updated: October 17, 2005 Copyright 2005 University of New Hampshire InterOperability Lab
More informationNetwork Working Group. Category: Experimental June 1996
Network Working Group P. Traina Request for Comments: 1965 cisco Systems Category: Experimental June 1996 Status of this Memo Autonomous System Confederations for BGP This memo defines an Experimental
More informationUNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM
UNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM CHAP Test Suite for iscsi Initiators Version 3.1 Technical Document Last Updated May 17, 2016 2015 University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory UNH-IOL iscsi Consortium
More informationIntroduction to IP Routing. Geoff Huston
Introduction to IP Routing Geoff Huston Routing How do packets get from A to B in the Internet? A Internet B Connectionless Forwarding Each router (switch) makes a LOCAL decision to forward the packet
More informationUNH-IOL. FC-1 Conformance Test Suite Version 4.3. Technical Document. Last Updated: February 23, 2008
UNH-IOL FIBRE CHANNEL CONSORTIUM FC-1 Conformance Test Suite Version 4.3 Technical Document Last Updated: February 23, 2008 Fibre Channel Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 InterOperability Laboratory
More information10 GIGABIT ETHERNET. 10GBASE-T Physical Layer Interoperability Test Suite Version 1.0. Technical Document. Last Updated: October 3, :30 PM
. 10 GIGABIT ETHERNET 10GBASE-T Physical Layer Interoperability Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: October 3, 2008 2:30 PM 10 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite
More informationUNH IOL SERIAL ATTACHED SCSI (SAS) CONSORTIUM
UNH IOL SERIAL ATTACHED SCSI (SAS) CONSORTIUM SAS 3.0 Receiver Physical Layer Test Suite Version 1.00 Technical Document Last Updated: September 29, 2014 UNH IOL SAS Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite
More informationETHERNET. Clause 28 Auto-Negotiation State Machine Base Page Exchange Test Suite v5.5. Technical Document. Last Updated: July 22, :11PM
ETHERNET Clause 28 Auto-Negotiation State Machine Base Page Exchange Test Suite v5.5 Technical Document Last Updated: July 22, 2004 6:11PM Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 oratory Durham,
More informationGIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM
GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM Clause 38 Optical PMD Test Suite Version 0.7 Technical Document Last Updated: August 19, 2008 11:30 AM Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824
More informationFast Ethernet Consortium
Fast Ethernet Consortium 100BASE-X PCS Test Suite Version 4.0 Technical Document Last Updated: April 30, 2015 Fast Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 University of New Hampshire
More informationWLAN The Wireless Local Area Network Consortium
WLAN The Wireless Local Area Network Consortium 802.11 Base AP MAC Layer Test Suite Version 3.5 Technical Document Last Updated: February 18, 2012 Wireless LAN Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2
More informationISP Border Definition. Alexander Azimov
ISP Border Definition Alexander Azimov ISP goal (one ASN) BGP Decision Process Step Attribute Transit 1 Highest Local Preference value Non-transit 2 Lowest AS Path length Transit 3 Lowest
More informationWLAN The Wireless Local Area Network Consortium
WLAN The Wireless Local Area Network Consortium WPA Station MAC Layer Test Suite Version 2.5 Technical Document Last Updated: February 18, 2013 Wireless LAN Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham,
More informationiscsi Consortium Multi-Connection Test Suite For iscsi Targets
iscsi Consortium Multi-Connection Test Suite For iscsi Targets Version 0.2 Last Update: February 2, 2004 iscsi Consortium 121 Technology Drive Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824-3525 Research Computing Center Phone:
More informationSERIAL ATTACHED SCSI (SAS) CONSORTIUM
SERIAL ATTACHED SCSI (SAS) CONSORTIUM Clause 8 SAS SPL Target Error Handling Test Suite Version0.3 Technical Document Last Updated: 6 September 2011 Serial Attached SCSI Consortium 121 Technology Drive,
More information40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET TESTING SERVICE
40 AND 100 GIGABIT ETHERNET TESTING SERVICE Clause 95 100GBASE-SR4 PMD Test Plan Version 1.1 Technical Document Last Updated: January 23, 2018 40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Testing Service 21 Madbury Road,
More informationBGP. Autonomous system (AS) BGP version 4
BGP Border Gateway Protocol (an introduction) dr. C. P. J. Koymans Informatics Institute University of Amsterdam (version 1.3, 2010/03/10 20:05:02) Monday, March 8, 2010 General ideas behind BGP Background
More informationVoice over IP Consortium
Voice over IP Consortium Version 1.6 Last Updated: August 20, 2010 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 University of New Hampshire Durham, NH 03824 Research Computing Center Phone: +1-603-862-0186 Fax: +1-603-862-4181
More informationBGP Route-Map Continue
The feature introduces the continue clause to BGP route-map configuration. The continue clause allows for more programmable policy configuration and route filtering and introduces the capability to execute
More information10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM. RS Test Suite V1.2a Technical Document. Last Updated: June 7, :30 pm
10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM 10GECTHE RS Test Suite V1.2a Technical Document Last Updated: June 7, 2005 6:30 pm 10 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 University
More informationBGP. Autonomous system (AS) BGP version 4
BGP Border Gateway Protocol (an introduction) Karst Koymans Informatics Institute University of Amsterdam (version 1.5, 2011/03/06 13:35:28) Monday, March 7, 2011 General ideas behind BGP Background Providers,
More informationETHERNET. Clause 28 Auto-Negotiation State Machine Base Page Exchange Test Suite v5.9. Technical Document. Last Updated: January 4, :00AM
ETHERNET Clause 28 Auto-Negotiation State Machine Base Page Exchange Test Suite v5.9 Technical Document Last Updated: January 4, 2007 9:00AM University of New Hampshire 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham,
More information40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Clause 86 40GBASE-SR4 and 100GBASE-SR10 PMD Test Suite v0.1 Technical Document
40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Clause 86 40GBASE-SR4 and 100GBASE-SR10 PMD Test Suite v0.1 Technical Document Last Updated: March 26, 2013 10:00am 40 and 100 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology
More informationInternet Routing Protocols Lecture 03 Inter-domain Routing
Internet Routing Protocols Lecture 03 Inter-domain Routing Advanced Systems Topics Lent Term, 2008 Timothy G. Griffin Computer Lab Cambridge UK Autonomous Routing Domains A collection of physical networks
More informationUNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM
UNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM Error Recovery Test Suite for iscsi Targets Version 2.1 Technical Document Last modified January 13, 2010 2006-2010 University of New Hampshire UNH-IOL iscsi Consortium 121 Technology
More informationUNH-IOL NVMe Test Consortium
UNH-IOL NVMe Test Consortium NVMe Integrators List Policy Version 7.0 Policy Document Last Updated : February 7,2017 UNH-IOL NVMe Consortium 21 Madbury Rd Suite 100 Durham, NH 03824 Tel: +1 603-862-0090
More informationUNH-IOL Open Networking Consortium
UNH-IOL Open Networking Consortium Open Networking Integrators List Policy Version 1.1 Policy Document Deleted: 1.0 Last Updated : March 31, 2016 Deleted: January 5, 2016 UNH-IOL Open Networking Consortium
More informationBGP Routing and BGP Policy. BGP Routing. Agenda. BGP Routing Information Base. L47 - BGP Routing. L47 - BGP Routing
BGP Routing and BGP Policy BGP Routing The BGP Routing Principles and Route Decisions based on AS-Path in a simple topology of AS s routing policy is reduced to a minimal function demonstrated in example
More informationUniversity of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Ethernet Consortium
University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Ethernet Consortium As of August 2 nd, 2000 the Ethernet Consortium Physical Layer Interoperability Conformance Test Suite Version 2000_08_01 has
More informationUniversity of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Gigabit Ethernet Consortium
University of New Hampshire Gigabit Ethernet Consortium As of August 25 th, 2003 the Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Clause 36 Physical Coding Sublayer Conformance Test Suite Version 1.9 has been superseded
More information10-Gigabit Ethernet Consortium
10-Gigabit Ethernet Consortium Proposed modifications to Ethernet Auto-Negotiation Test Suites for 10GBASE-T V0.2 Cover Page Draft Technical Document Last Updated: February 8, 2006 10:03AM 10 Gigabit Ethernet
More informationFibre Channel Consortium
Fibre Channel Consortium FC-PI-5 Clause 5 Bit Error Rate Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: September 30, 2014 Fibre Channel Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824
More informationInter-Autonomous-System Routing: Border Gateway Protocol
Inter-Autonomous-System Routing: Border Gateway Protocol Antonio Carzaniga Faculty of Informatics University of Lugano June 14, 2005 Outline Hierarchical routing BGP Routing Routing Goal: each router u
More informationUNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM
UNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM Login Phase Test Suite for iscsi Initiators Version 3.0 Technical Document Last Updated November 19, 2015 2015 University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory UNH-IOL iscsi
More informationETHERNET. Clause 28 Auto-Negotiation State Machine Base Page Exchange Test Suite v6.4. Technical Document. Last Updated: October 15, :00pm
ETHERNET Clause 28 Auto-Negotiation State Machine Base Page Exchange Test Suite v6.4 Technical Document Last Updated: October 15, 2018 12:00pm University of New Hampshire 22 Madbury Road, Suite 100 Durham,
More informationThe University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory 10 GIGABIT ETHERNET. Clause 46 10Gb/s RS Test Suite Version 1.1 Technical Document
10 GIGABIT ETHERNET Clause 46 10Gb/s RS Test Suite Version 1.1 Technical Document Last Updated: September 18, 2002 9:12AM 10 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium 121 Technology Drive Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 Research
More informationDepartment of Computer and IT Engineering University of Kurdistan. Computer Networks II Border Gateway protocol (BGP) By: Dr. Alireza Abdollahpouri
Department of Computer and IT Engineering University of Kurdistan Computer Networks II Border Gateway protocol (BGP) By: Dr. Alireza Abdollahpouri Internet structure: network of networks local ISP Tier
More informationBGP. Autonomous system (AS) BGP version 4
BGP Border Gateway Protocol (an introduction) dr. C. P. J. Koymans Informatics Institute University of Amsterdam March 11, 2008 General ideas behind BGP Background Providers, Customers and Peers External
More informationSERIAL ATTACHED SCSI (SAS) CONSORTIUM
SERIAL ATTACHED SCSI (SAS) CONSORTIUM Clause 6 SAS SPL Link Layer Test Suite Version 1.3 Technical Document Last Updated: 6 September 2011 Serial Attached SCSI Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2
More informationTHE ETHERNET IN THE FIRST MILE CONSORTIUM. Annex 4A MAC Conformance Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document
EFM THE ETHERNET IN THE FIRST MILE CONSORTIUM Annex 4A MAC Conformance Test Suite Version 1.0 Technical Document COVER PAGE Last Updated: February 14, 2005 12:30 pm Ethernet in the First Mile Consortium
More informationWireless LAN Consortium
Wireless LAN Consortium 802.11ac Wave-2 Evaluation Test Suite Version 1.2 Technical Document Last Updated: October 20, 2015 Wireless LAN Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH03824 University
More informationMultiprotocol BGP (MBGP)
Multiprotocol BGP (MBGP) Module 5 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc. 1 Copyright 1998-2000, Cisco Systems, Inc. Module5.ppt 1 Module Objectives Understand that MBGP is NOT a replacement for PIM Understand the basic
More informationUNH-IOL NVMe Test Consortium
UNH-IOL NVMe Test Consortium NVMe Integrators List Policy Version 1.1 Policy Document Last Updated : December 19, 2013 UNH-IOL NVMe Consortium 121 Technology Dr Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 Tel: +1 603-862-0090
More informationRouting Protocols. Technology Description BGP CHAPTER
CHAPTER 11 This chapter describes the level of support that Cisco ANA provides for routing protocols, as follows: Technology Description, page 11-1 Information Model Objects (IMOs), page 11-3 Vendor-Specific
More informationBTEC Level 3 Extended Diploma
BTEC Level 3 Extended Diploma Unit 9 Computer Network Routing and Routing Protocols BTEC Level 3 Extended Diploma Introduction to Routing Routing is the process that a router uses to forward packets toward
More informationLab 8.4.2: Show IP Route Challenge Lab
Addressing Table Device Interface IP Address Subnet Mask R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 Learning Objectives Upon completion of this lab, you will be able to: Determine network topology based on the outputs from the show
More information10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM. 10GBASE-R PCS Test Suite V1.0 Technical Document. Last Updated: September 30, :30pm
10 GIGABIT ETHERNET CONSORTIUM 10GECTHE 10GBASE-R PCS Test Suite V1.0 Technical Document Last Updated: September 30, 2005 6:30pm 10 Gigabit Ethernet Consortium University of New Hampshire InterOperability
More informationConnecting to a Service Provider Using External BGP
Connecting to a Service Provider Using External BGP First Published: May 2, 2005 Last Updated: August 21, 2007 This module describes configuration tasks that will enable your Border Gateway Protocol (BGP)
More informationBorder Gateway Protocol (an introduction) Karst Koymans. Monday, March 10, 2014
.. BGP Border Gateway Protocol (an introduction) Karst Koymans Informatics Institute University of Amsterdam (version 3.10, 2014/03/11 10:50:06) Monday, March 10, 2014 Karst Koymans (UvA) BGP Monday, March
More informationiscsi Consortium Full Feature Phase Test Suite For iscsi Initiators
iscsi Consortium Full Feature Phase Test Suite For iscsi Initiators Version 0.1 Last Update: July 3, 2003 iscsi Consortium 121 Technology Drive Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824-3525 Research Computing Center Phone:
More informationiscsi Consortium Error Recovery Test Suite For iscsi Targets
iscsi Consortium Error Recovery Test Suite For iscsi Targets Version 0.2 Last Update: February 19 2004 iscsi Consortium 121 Technology Drive Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824-3525 Research Computing Center Phone:
More informationUNH IOL NVMe Test Consortium
UNH IOL NVMe Test Consortium NVMe Integrators List Policy Version 6.0 Policy Document Last Updated : September 6, 2016 UNH IOL NVMe Consortium 21 Madbury Rd Suite 100 Durham, NH 03824 Tel: +1 603 862 0090
More informationiscsi Consortium Login Phase Test Suite For iscsi Initiators
iscsi Consortium Login Phase Test Suite For iscsi Initiators Version 0.1 Last Update: July 28, 2003 iscsi Consortium 121 Technology Drive Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824-3525 Research Computing Center Phone:
More informationContents. Configuring MSDP 1
Contents Configuring MSDP 1 Overview 1 How MSDP works 1 MSDP support for VPNs 6 Protocols and standards 6 MSDP configuration task list 7 Configuring basic MSDP features 7 Configuration prerequisites 7
More informationInternet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track December 2012 ISSN:
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Q. Vohra Request for Comments: 6793 Juniper Networks Obsoletes: 4893 E. Chen Updates: 4271 Cisco Systems Category: Standards Track December 2012 ISSN: 2070-1721 Abstract
More informationData Center Bridging Consortium
Data Center Bridging Consortium 802.1Qaz DCB Capability Exchange Protocol Test Suite Report UNH-IOL 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 Durham, NH 03824 +1-603-862-0090 Data Center Bridging Consortium dcblab@iol.unh.edu
More informationConfigure the IPv6 BGP Local Preference Feature
Configure the IPv6 BGP Local Preference Feature Document ID: 113035 Contents Introduction Prerequisites Requirements Components Used Conventions Background Information Configure Network Diagram Configurations
More informationUNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM
UNH IOL iscsi CONSORTIUM Error Recovery Test Suite for iscsi Targets Version 0.2 Technical Document Last Updated January 4, 2007 2006 University of New Hampshire UNH-IOL iscsi Consortium 121 Technology
More informationTDTS04 Computer networks and distributed systems Final Exam: 14:00-18:00, Thursday, March 20, 2014
(TEN1) Final Examination: 14:00-18:00, Thursday, August 20, 2014 Time: 240 minutes Total Marks: 40 Grade Requirements: three (20/40); four (28/40); and five (36/40). Assistance: None (closed book, closed
More informationUniversity of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Ethernet Consortium
University of New Hampshire InterOperability Laboratory Ethernet Consortium As of January 3 rd, 1997 the Ethernet Consortium Clause # 28 Auto Negotiation State Machine Base Page Exchange Conformance Test
More informationIN THE FIRST MILE CONSORTIUM. Clause 65 Test Suite v1.1 Technical Document. Last Updated: March 23, :43pm
EFM ETHERNET IN THE FIRST MILE CONSORTIUM Technical Document Last Updated: March 23, 2005 12:43pm Ethernet in the First Mile Consortium 121 Technology Drive, Suite 2 InterOperability Laboratory Durham,
More information