UNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
|
|
- Stewart Cobb
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February : Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Cost To Complete Total Program Element Continuing Continuing P781: Software Engineering P783: Software Producibility Initiative Continuing Continuing Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Software is a key to meeting the Department of Defense's (DoD s) increasing demand for high-quality, affordable, and timely national defense systems. Systemic software issues are significant contributors to poor program execution, and reliance on software-intensive mobile and net based products and systems has been increasing (for example (e.g.), Joint Tactical Radio System, USS ZUMWALT (DDG-1000), Joint Strike Fighter, F-22, and Army Modernization). As stated in the 2010 National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences report entitled Critical Code, It is dangerous to conclude that we are reaching a plateau in capability and technology for software producibility. The report notes that software is unconstrained by traditional physical engineering limitations and what we can accomplish is derived from [the] human intellectual capacity to conceptualize and understand systems. With growing global parity in software engineering, the DoD must maintain leadership to avoid strategic surprise. The Software Engineering Program Element (PE) addresses the critical need to research, develop, and rapidly transition state-of-the-art software technology, tools, development environments, and best practices to improve the engineering, management, fielding, evolution, acquisition, and sustainment of software-intensive DoD systems. The SEI s program of work coordinates across the Department through Reliance 21, the overarching framework of the DoD s Science and Technology (S&T) joint planning and coordination process. This PE directly benefits these DoD S&T Communities of Interest (COI): Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I); Autonomy; Cyber; and Engineered Resilient Systems. Additionally, this PE benefits every COI to some degree due to the ubiquitous nature of software. This PE also leverages expertise in government, industry, and academia to enable the development of joint-service capabilities. Software is more pervasive than ever and computer programs are growing in size and complexity. Designing, managing, and securing integrated, complex, and large-scale mission-critical systems are abilities that the DoD and the Defense Industrial Base have not yet mastered. To address this, the PE funds research and development within the SEI Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) and, to access particular expertise, in the Services, industry, and academia. The SEI FFRDC is the DoD s dedicated source for software research and development. It is an institute which enables the exploitation of emerging software technology by bringing engineering, management, and security discipline to software acquisition, development, and evolution. The SEI FFRDC focuses on software technology areas judged to be of the highest payoff in meeting defense needs. Private sector investment has created rapid advances in information technologies, but the pace of transition to DoD applications is often very slow or the commercial applications do not meet DoD unique needs, e.g., high assurance software or large-scale integrated systems. The DoD needs to create opportunities to discover emerging technologies, to evaluate their potential to fit DoD needs, and where appropriate, conduct critical tests of the technologies under DoD conditions. The Total Cost PE D8Z: Software Engineering Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #62
2 Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February : Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development (ATD) Software Producibility Initiative, project P783, works across the Services, industry, and academia to research and transition software science and tools that address the capacity to design, produce, assure, and evolve software-intensive systems in a predictable manner while effectively managing risk, cost, schedule, quality, and complexity. B. Program Change Summary ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total Previous President's Budget Current President's Budget Total Adjustments Congressional General Reductions - - Congressional Directed Reductions - - Congressional Rescissions - - Congressional Adds - - Congressional Directed Transfers - - Reprogrammings SBIR/STTR Transfer FFRDC Sec Economic Assumptions Realignment for Higher Priority Programs Change Summary Explanation Funding decreases were used to pay for higher priority DoD bills. PE D8Z: Software Engineering Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 2 of 8 R-1 Line #62
3 COST ($ in Millions) P781: Software Engineering Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 PE D8Z: Software Engineering Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 3 of 8 R-1 Line #62 P781 / Software Engineering Cost To Complete Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification The Software Engineering Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) was established in 1984 as an integral part of the Department of Defense s (DoD s) initiative to identify, evaluate, and transition software engineering technologies and practices. The SEI maintains unique software research and program support capabilities in a space where the Defense Industrial Base and academia cannot as readily address challenges. The mission of the SEI is to provide DoD with technical leadership and innovation through research and development to advance the practice of software engineering and technology. The Institute works across Government, industry, and academia to improve the state of software engineering from the technical, acquisition, and management perspectives. The SEI engages in research and development of critical software technologies and tools, and collaborates with the larger software engineering research community. It facilitates rapid transition of software engineering technologies into practice, and evaluates emerging software engineering technologies to determine their potential for improving software-intensive DoD systems. Since its inception, the SEI has helped to transform the fields of software engineering and acquisition, network security, realtime systems, software architectures, and software-engineering process management. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Title: Software Engineering Research Description: SEI research projects are awarded on a competitive basis across the SEI. The number of projects will vary from year to year based on the size and scope of proposed projects. Research projects cross-cut the FFRDC's experience base in order to advance existing SEI research initiatives and explore new technical ideas. SEI research focuses on the most significant and pervasive software challenges within the DoD such as computing for real-time and embedded-systems, multi-core programming, computing at the tactical edge, System of System architectures, discovering effective agile methods to develop DoD-scale systems, cyber-security, and measurement-driven methods to improve the efficiency of acquisition programs. FY 2014 Accomplishments: Developed a technique to enable proactive cost control for major systems, by determining the impact of design choices on the cost of testing. SEI blog post highly accessed in calendar year (CY) 2014: 166,000 hits. Developed programming techniques for multicore platforms that increase speed and efficiency while guaranteeing real-time performance. Awarded Top Paper at the 20th Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Real-Time and Embedded Technology and Applications Symposium. Developed a method and tools to aid in assuring quality and affordability in the design of big data systems. Work tailored to and piloted on the Military Health System. Using the CERT insider threat detection test bed, evaluated trends and developed guidance which substantially improves sustained protection against internal attacks. Total Cost
4 PE D8Z: Software Engineering Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 4 of 8 R-1 Line #62 P781 / Software Engineering B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Transitioned research in vulnerability discovery, for both dynamic and static analysis, resulting in software applications that are hardened and more secure, before and after they are deployed into the DoD infrastructure, including a Major Defense Acquisition Program. Automated the detection of malicious network traffic to identify indicators that expedite detection and response. Prototyped algorithms that will allow DoD to take advantage of computer network modeling and analysis for insider threat and advanced persistent threat faster and at less cost. Technology transferred to multiple DoD entities and U.S. Government independent establishments. FY 2015 Plans: Increase the library of algorithms that allow DoD to better utilize computer network modeling and analysis, social network analysis, and command and control decisions. Pilot and evaluate technologies and methods to assess individual and team performance during exercises for cyber mission teams. Prototype software systems for detecting enterprise-wide insider threats. Research disruptive technologies, such as dynamic collaborative human-computer decision systems, insider threat mitigation, and automated vulnerability discovery in mobile platforms; providing new operational cybersecurity capabilities for the DoD. Develop and pilot automated vulnerability discovery tools to assist in determining how to allocate resources towards unique, exploitable software faults, reducing system exposure and cost. Test, validate and release guidelines that will enable DoD programs to successfully use Agile software development approaches. Plans: Develop and pilot high performance, assured software components for the processing, exploitation, and dissemination of information from the tactical edge to the data center. Evolve programming and computation frameworks for big data analysis, network protocols and architectures enabling access to data in disconnected, intermittent, low-bandwidth environments for better situational awareness and response. Evolve model-based engineering of software-reliant systems and assurance evidence with support for automatic generation of secure code, virtual integration of subsystems and assessment of technical debt, automated code vulnerability discovery and synthesis of assurance cases. Advance the state of the practice in electronic warfare and protection on coordinated and distributed network enabled systems, maturing and transitioning tools and techniques for software architectures and adaptive capabilities. Enhance and deploy scalable and validated methods and software support for the training and development of the cyber and software engineering workforce. Explore new lines of research. Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals
5 P781 / Software Engineering C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) Line Item FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Cost To Complete Total Cost BA 2, PE # D8Z, Continuing Continuing P278: Software Engineering Institute Applied Research Remarks D. Acquisition Strategy N/A E. Performance Metrics Transition of tools and practices for use in DoD programs of record and to the Defense Industrial Base, and number of agencies and organizations sponsoring work. Number of publications in refereed journals and peer reviewed reports. Number of external research collaborations and interactions with the broader software engineering research community. Adoption of coding standards and process techniques by standards bodies, working groups, and software/systems engineering organizations. Number of training courses and curricula developed to contribute to the growth of capability in the software engineering research and development community and software/system acquisition workforce. Development of new scalable technical and software-enabled cyber security approaches that address software assurance and improve enterprise resiliency. Reduced number of mission-critical software-reliant acquisition program failures and cost and schedule overruns, as well as quantitative improvements in overall system cost, time to develop, and performance this will be evidenced by: reductions in time to test software and the amount of rework required; improved ability to articulate software requirements; development of techniques that offer orders of magnitude improvement in software productivity; development of new software algorithms and abstractions; and decreased number of software defects found through application of effective process and software development methods. PE D8Z: Software Engineering Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 5 of 8 R-1 Line #62
6 COST ($ in Millions) P783: Software Producibility Initiative Prior Years FY 2014 FY 2015 Base OCO P783 / Software Producibility Initiative Total FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 Cost To Complete Continuing Continuing A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification Shortcomings in software development often lead to schedule slippage, cost growth, and mission compromise. These shortcomings can frequently be traced to software development technologies which are not capable of addressing the scale and complexity of the software needed in today s systems. The Software Producibility Initiative seeks to conduct an integrated program of research from applied research through demonstration and evaluation to advance the state-of-the-art in the producibility of software for DoD systems, particularly those systems characterized by high complexity, need for robustness, information assurance, real-time performance, and physical distribution. The Initiative maintains a portfolio of work relevant to the Warfighter and DoD needs by periodically evaluating technology development efforts, retiring those that are under performing, and starting new efforts based on risk-reward priority. The Initiative demonstrates new underlying software technology and tools in various domains, e.g., Networks, Modeling and Simulation, Avionics, Signals Intelligence, where DoD can benefit and enhance the transition paths for the underlying technology. B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Title: Software Producibility Initiative Description: The Software Producibility Initiative seeks to improve the Department of Defense s (DoD s) ability to design, build, test, and sustain software-intensive systems which meet mission critical requirements, exhibit predictable behavior, and enable evolution and interoperability. Technology thrust areas include specification of complex requirements; correct-by-construction software development; scalable composition; high-confidence software and middleware; system architectures for network-centric environments; technologies for system visualization, testing, verification, and validation; model-driven development approaches; timing techniques for real-time embedded-systems; static and run-time analysis of software; design tools and development environments; and secure and efficient coding practices. Major collaborators and performers include the U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center (AMRDEC) and the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL), as well as academia and industry. FY 2014 Accomplishments: Explored model-based design and the use of formal mathematics and logic to build systems that behave as intended, and only as intended. Using model-driven development, demonstrated the value of early discovery of potential system integration issues on the AMRDEC Joint Multi-role Rotorcraft technology demonstration program. Developed a programming language and run-time system (open source) that enables high-level language support for exposing and managing node failure in high performance computing systems and commodity clusters. Total Cost PE D8Z: Software Engineering Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 6 of 8 R-1 Line #62
7 PE D8Z: Software Engineering Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 7 of 8 R-1 Line #62 P783 / Software Producibility Initiative B. Accomplishments/Planned Programs ($ in Millions) FY 2014 FY 2015 Established guidance on techniques and principles for design-time and run-time tools that anticipate change and exhibit resilience. Demonstrated and tested a software tool suite that verifies early design through automatically-generated, mathematicallyverifiable requirements statements. Developed tools to reduce software bloat and speed up execution time in C, C++, and other-languages. Began transition of tools to customers within the Naval Research Laboratory. Wrote a Software Development fact book and analyzed software engineering acquisition data to determine Return on Investment. Completed development of a technology roadmap that identifies critical capability thresholds to improve software producibility and an intellectual property strategy guide and template. Established a modeling environment for the design of safety-critical applications with better safety guarantees. Technology transferred through a course developed and delivered at Virginia Polytechnic Institute. Developed, up to run-time implementation, a model for composing parallel applications in a heterogeneous multicore environment that would allow applications to be ported more easily to different computers. Continued work to speed the transition of software research and development that increases the affordability of acquisition programs in accordance with the DoD s Better Buying Power initiative. Identified which techniques supporting model-based design of complex, heterogeneous, software intensive systems are sufficiently mature for transition into industrial practice, which require further research investment, and which should be abandoned. Successfully concluded the Software Producibility Initiative by transitioning technologies where able and completing plans in remaining execution years. C. Other Program Funding Summary ($ in Millions) N/A Remarks D. Acquisition Strategy N/A Accomplishments/Planned Programs Subtotals E. Performance Metrics Number of tools developed which enable the specification of interface formalisms, the definition of component interfaces, and the checking of correct composition. Demonstrable reduction in the number of vulnerabilities and errors detected in software code of large software systems.
8 P783 / Software Producibility Initiative Number of transitions of promising systems and software engineering technologies to the DoD and Defense Industrial Base, and successful adoption of technologies by early adopter partners. Observed improvements in cost, schedule, and performance via advances in the producibility of software for complex DoD systems and the productivity of software developers. Number of multiple, active collaborations achieved between Software Producibility performers and the broader software engineering research community. Number of coordinated and joint-service activities across research efforts. PE D8Z: Software Engineering Office of the Secretary Of Defense Page 8 of 8 R-1 Line #62
UNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 2: COST ($ in Millions) Prior
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 Program Element (Number/Name) PE D8Z / Software Engineering Institute (SEI) Applied Research. Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 2: COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 11 R-1 Line #65
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior FY 2014 Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400:,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 3: Advanced Technology (ATD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 0400: Research,, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide BA 3: Advanced Technology (ATD) COST ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #18
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2015 Office of Secretary Of Defense Date: March 2014 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($ in Millions)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 2: Applied Research COST ($
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Office of the Secretary Of Defense : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Data to Decisions Advanced Technology FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2011 BA 3: Advanced Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE. FY 2014 FY 2014 OCO ## Total FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: April 2013 BA 3: Advanced (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base OCO ## Total FY 2015
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Software Engineering Institute (SEI) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Office of Secretary Of Defense DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Base OCO Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Air Force DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED R-1 Line Item #49 Page 1 of 10
Exhibit R-2, PB 2010 Office of Secretary Of Defense RDT&E Budget Item Justification DATE: May 2009 3 - Advanced Technology Development (ATD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 2008 Actual FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Air Force DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) # ## FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 Program Element - 0.000 0.000 5.853-5.853 5.961 6.181 6.290 6.404
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) (+)
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Defense Information Systems Agency DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base PE 0305208K: Distributed Common Ground/Surface Systems
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 8 R-1 Line #192
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Air Force : February 2015 3600: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Air Force / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 8.306 7.299 10.429-10.429 11.464 12.492 12.840 13.010 Continuing Continuing
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element - - 38.094-38.094 38.503 39.587 40.754 41.292 Continuing Continuing
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date February 2007 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E Defense-Wide, BA 7
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date February 2007 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E Defense-Wide, BA 7 R-1 Item Nomenclature: Net Centricity PE 0305199D8Z Cost ($ in millions) FY 2006 FY
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February 6 Exhibit R, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB : Research,, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) FY 5 FY 6 R Program Element (Number/Name) PE 65A /
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Security Service Date: February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development COST
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #193
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 Base OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Air Force Page 1 of 5 R-1 Line #193 Cost To Complete Total Program Element - 30.944 35.657 20.806-20.806
More informationOSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0605140D8Z OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) APPROPRIATION/ BUDGET ACTIVITY RDTE, Defense Wide BA 05 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 COST ($ in Millions) Estimate Estimate Estimate
More informationDoD Strategy for Cyber Resilient Weapon Systems
DoD Strategy for Cyber Resilient Weapon Systems Melinda K. Reed Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering NDIA Systems Engineering Conference October 2016 10/24/2016 Page-1
More informationOSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit)
Exhibit R-2 0605140D8Z OSD RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (R2 Exhibit) APPROPRIATION/ BUDGET ACTIVITY RDTE, Defense Wide BA# 5 0605140D8Z - FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 COST ($ in Millions) Actual Estimate
More informationOverview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 PPD-21: CI Security and Resilience On February 12, 2013, President Obama signed Presidential Policy Directive
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8W: IT Software Development Initiatives. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Washington Headquarters Service DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 1.511 1.447 1.756-1.756 1.792 1.827
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. UNCLASSIFIED Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #218
COST ($ in Millions) Prior Years FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Base FY 2015 FY 2015 OCO # Total FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 Office of Secretary Of Defense Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line #218 Cost To Complete Total
More informationAccelerate Your Enterprise Private Cloud Initiative
Cisco Cloud Comprehensive, enterprise cloud enablement services help you realize a secure, agile, and highly automated infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) environment for cost-effective, rapid IT service
More informationImplementing a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) to Achieve Acquisition Agility in Defense Acquisition Programs
Implementing a Modular Open Systems Approach (MOSA) to Achieve Acquisition Agility in Defense Acquisition Programs Philomena Zimmerman Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Information Systems Agency : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2014 Defense Security Cooperation Agency DATE: April 2013 COST ($ in Millions) All Prior Years FY 2012 FY 2013 # Base Information Management System (PIMS)
More informationThe Perfect Storm Cyber RDT&E
The Perfect Storm Cyber RDT&E NAVAIR Public Release 2015-87 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited Presented to: ITEA Cyber Workshop 25 February 2015 Presented by: John Ross NAVAIR 5.4H Cyberwarfare
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Network Centric Collaborative Targeting FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 8.126 13.367 7.348-7.348 7.526
More informationDepartment of Defense Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 IT President's Budget Request Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Overview
Mission Area Business System Breakout Appropriation BMA 0.027 Total 35.003 Defense Business Systems 0.027 All Other Resources 34.976 EIEMA 34.976 FY 2014 ($M) FY 2014 ($M) 35.003 FY 2014 ($M) FY13 to FY14
More informationSection One of the Order: The Cybersecurity of Federal Networks.
Summary and Analysis of the May 11, 2017 Presidential Executive Order on Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure. Introduction On May 11, 2017, President Donald
More informationAdvanced Cyber Risk Management Threat Modeling & Cyber Wargaming April 23, 2018
Advanced Cyber Risk Management Threat Modeling & Cyber Wargaming April 23, 2018 The Homeland Security Systems Engineering and Development Institute (HSSEDI ) is a trademark of the U.S. Department of Homeland
More informationIntegrated C4isr and Cyber Solutions
Integrated C4isr and Cyber Solutions When Performance Matters L3 Communication Systems-East provides solutions in the C4ISR and cyber markets that support mission-critical operations worldwide. With a
More informationDefense Engineering Excellence
Defense Engineering Excellence Kristen J. Baldwin Principal Deputy Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering, OUSD(AT&L) 18th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference
More informationNew Horizons. Dr. Bryant Wysocki Chief Engineer AFRL Information Directorate. 13 March 2017
New Horizons Dr. Bryant Wysocki Chief Engineer AFRL Information Directorate 13 March 2017 Air Force Research Laboratory 2 Information Technologies....Touch Every Other AFRL Directorate C 4+1 I Command,
More informationSpace and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic Information Warfare Research Project (IWRP)
Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Atlantic Information Warfare Research Project (IWRP) SSC Atlantic is part of the Naval Research & Development Establishment (NR&DE) Information Warfare Research Project
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 Base OCO Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 40.918 31.956 19.586-19.586 37.811 33.105 31.782 - Continuing Continuing
More informationThe University of Queensland
UQ Cyber Security Strategy 2017-2020 NAME: UQ Cyber Security Strategy DATE: 21/07/2017 RELEASE:0.2 Final AUTHOR: OWNER: CLIENT: Marc Blum Chief Information Officer Strategic Information Technology Council
More informationStatement for the Record
Statement for the Record of Seán P. McGurk Director, Control Systems Security Program National Cyber Security Division National Protection and Programs Directorate Department of Homeland Security Before
More informationNCSF Foundation Certification
NCSF Foundation Certification Overview This ACQUIROS accredited training program is targeted at IT and Cybersecurity professionals looking to become certified on how to operationalize the NIST Cybersecurity
More informationExecutive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses
Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses The Wh... Page 1 of 11 EXECUTIVE ORDERS Executive Order on Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses INFRASTRUCTURE
More informationDepartment of Defense. Installation Energy Resilience
Department of Defense Installation Energy Resilience Lisa A. Jung DASD (Installation Energy) OASD(Energy, Installations and Environment) 19 June 2018 Installation Energy is Energy that Powers Our Military
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Tactical Data Links
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 Total FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Navy Page 1 of 16 R-1 Line Item #183 To Complete
More informationStrengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure
Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure Executive Order 13800 Update July 2017 In Brief On May 11, 2017, President Trump issued Executive Order 13800, Strengthening
More informationAdvanced Technology Academic Research Council Federal CISO Summit. Ms. Thérèse Firmin
Advanced Technology Academic Research Council Federal CISO Summit Ms. Thérèse Firmin Acting Deputy DoD CIO Cyber Security Department of Defense 25 January 2018 2 Overview Secretary Mattis Priorities Cybersecurity
More informationCritical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) as example of a multi-stakeholder approach.
Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) as example of a multi-stakeholder approach. By Christopher Ganizani Banda ICT Development Manager Malawi Communications Regulatory Authority 24-26th July,2016 Khartoum,
More informationEngineered Resilient Systems Advanced Analytics and Modeling in Support of Acquisition
Engineered Resilient Systems Advanced Analytics and Modeling in Support of Acquisition David R. Richards Lead Technical Director for ERS US Army Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) Research
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Command Control and Communications. FY 2011 Total Estimate. FY 2011 OCO Estimate
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2011 Air Force DATE: February 2010 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2009 Actual FY 2010 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 Cost To Complete Program Element 114.510
More informationCERT Overview. Jeffrey J. Carpenter 2008 Carnegie Mellon University
CERT Overview Jeffrey J. Carpenter 2008 Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute Department of Defense R&D Laboratory FFRDC Created in 1984 Administered by Carnegie Mellon
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2008
PE NUMBER: 63432F PE TITLE: Polar MILSATCOM (Space) Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 28 4 Advanced Component Development and Prototypes (ACD&P) 63432F Polar MILSATCOM (Space) ($ in
More informationRocky Mountain Cyberspace Symposium 2018 DoD Cyber Resiliency
Rocky Mountain Cyberspace Symposium 2018 DoD Cyber Resiliency Mr. Ed Brindley Acting Deputy Cyber Security Department of Defense 7 March 2018 SUPPORT THE WARFIGHTER 2 Overview Secretary Mattis Priorities
More informationSystems 2020 Strategic Initiative Overview
Systems 2020 Strategic Initiative Overview Kristen Baldwin ODDR&E/Systems Engineering 13 th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference San Diego, CA October 28, 2010 Oct 2010 Page-1 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0603840F PE TITLE: Global Broadcast Service Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009
More informationUBIQUITIOUS, RESILIENT, SECURE CONNECTIVITY IN THE NEAR-PEER THREAT ENVIRONMENT
2018 Viasat White Paper August 27, 2018 UBIQUITIOUS, RESILIENT, SECURE CONNECTIVITY IN THE NEAR-PEER THREAT ENVIRONMENT With Hybrid Adaptive Networking By Craig Miller Vice President, Chief Technical Officer
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Facility Restoration and Modernization - T&E
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Cost To Complete Cost Program Element 52.190 46.327 44.547-44.547
More informationTest Resource Management Center Directed Energy T&E Conference A Joint DEPS ITEA Event
Test Resource Management Center Directed Energy T&E Conference A Joint DEPS ITEA Event Mr. George Rumford Deputy Director Major Initiatives and Technical Analyses Test Resource Management Center January
More informationNational Policy and Guiding Principles
National Policy and Guiding Principles National Policy, Principles, and Organization This section describes the national policy that shapes the National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace and the basic framework
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE N: Surface ASW
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Navy DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 Navy Page 1 of 10 R-1 Line Item #41 To Program Element
More informationAvionics Cyber T&E Examples Testing Cyber Security Resilience to support Operations in the 3rd Offset Environment
Avionics Cyber T&E Examples Testing Cyber Security Resilience to support Operations in the 3rd Offset Environment 26 January 2017 Presented by: Mr. Chad Miller NAVAIR Cyber T&E What: Replicate Cyber Battlespace
More informationUNCLASSIFIED R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2013 Navy DATE: February 2012 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 To Program Element 4.231 - - - - - - - - 0.000 4.231
More informationCyber Defense Maturity Scorecard DEFINING CYBERSECURITY MATURITY ACROSS KEY DOMAINS
Cyber Defense Maturity Scorecard DEFINING CYBERSECURITY MATURITY ACROSS KEY DOMAINS Cyber Defense Maturity Scorecard DEFINING CYBERSECURITY MATURITY ACROSS KEY DOMAINS Continual disclosed and reported
More information2 nd Cybersecurity Workshop Test and Evaluation to Meet the Advanced Persistent Threat
2 nd Cybersecurity Workshop Test and Evaluation to Meet the Advanced Persistent Threat Faye Francy Aviation ISAC February 2015 Company Organization Corporate Defense, Space & Security Boeing Capital Corporation
More informationWhite Paper. View cyber and mission-critical data in one dashboard
View cyber and mission-critical data in one dashboard Table of contents Rising cyber events 2 Mitigating threats 2 Heighten awareness 3 Evolving the solution 5 One of the direct benefits of the Homeland
More informationUNCLASSIFIED FY 2016 OCO. FY 2016 Base
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Defense Information Systems Agency : February 2015 0400: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Defense-Wide / BA 7: Operational Systems Development
More informationShaping the Department of Defense Engineering Workforce
Shaping the Department of Defense Engineering Workforce Ms. Aileen Sedmak Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering 20th Annual NDIA Systems Engineering Conference Springfield,
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE D8Z: Joint Tactical Information Distribution System (JTIDS) FY 2013 OCO
COST ($ in Millions) FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 Base FY 2013 OCO FY 2013 Total FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Cost To Complete Total Cost Total Program Element 20.253 16.780 20.688-20.688 21.250 19.966 17.855
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
PE NUMBER: 0604853F PE TITLE: Evolved Expendable Launch - EMD Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification BUDGET ACTIVITY PE NUMBER AND TITLE Launch - EMD 0004 (U) Cost ($ in Millions) FY 2004 FY 2005
More informationExhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 2004
PE NUMBER: 64421F PE TITLE: Counterspace Systems Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification February 24 5 System Development and Demonstration (SDD) 64421F Counterspace Systems Cost ($ in Millions) A1
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE PE F: Polar MILSATCOM (Space) FY 2012 OCO
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2012 Air Force DATE: February 2011 COST ($ in Millions) FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 To Program Element 246.660 164.232 122.991-122.991
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. FY 2016 Base FY 2016 OCO
Exhibit R2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 2016 Navy : February 2015 1319: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) Years
More informationUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED
: February 06 Exhibit R, RDT&E Budget Item Justification: PB 040: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, / BA 5: System Development & Demonstration (SDD) COST ($ in Millions) R Program Element (Number/Name)
More informationRSA Solution Brief. Managing Risk Within Advanced Security Operations. RSA Solution Brief
RSA Solution Brief Managing Risk Within Advanced Security Operations RSA Solution Brief How do you advance your security operations function? Increasingly sophisticated security threats and the growing
More informationSYMANTEC: SECURITY ADVISORY SERVICES. Symantec Security Advisory Services The World Leader in Information Security
SYMANTEC: SECURITY ADVISORY SERVICES Symantec Security Advisory Services The World Leader in Information Security Knowledge, as the saying goes, is power. At Symantec we couldn t agree more. And when it
More informationDELIVERING MISSION BASED OUTCOMES TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY SINCE 2002 MISSION-DRIVEN SOLUTIONS 1
DELIVERING MISSION BASED OUTCOMES TO THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY SINCE 2002 MISSION-DRIVEN SOLUTIONS 1 MISSION-DRIVEN SOLUTIONS 2018 INTEGRATED INTEL SOLUTIONS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED MISSION-DRIVEN SOLUTIONS
More informationRED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX. STANDARDIZE & SAVE.
RED HAT ENTERPRISE LINUX. STANDARDIZE & SAVE. Is putting Contact us INTRODUCTION You know the headaches of managing an infrastructure that is stretched to its limit. Too little staff. Too many users. Not
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 11, 2017 EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - STRENGTHENING THE CYBERSECURITY OF FEDERAL NETWORKS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE By the authority
More informationTHE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 11, 2017 THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER - - - - - - - STRENGTHENING THE CYBERSECURITY OF FEDERAL NETWORKS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE By the authority
More informationSpace Cyber: An Aerospace Perspective
Space Cyber: An Aerospace Perspective USAF Cyber Vision 2025 AFSPC 19-21 March 2012 Frank Belz and Joe Betser The Aerospace Corporation Computers and Software Division 20 March 2012 frank.belz@aero.org
More informationUNCLASSIFIED. Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2008 Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E, Dw BA 06
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification Date: February 2008 R-1 Item Nomenclature: Support to Networks and Information Integration, 0605170D8Z Cost ($ in millions) FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
More informationIntroducing Cyber Resiliency Concerns Into Engineering Education
Introducing Cyber Resiliency Concerns Into Engineering Education Mr. Tom McDermott Georgia Tech Research Institute Mr. Barry Horowitz University of Virginia NDIA 20 th Annual Systems Engineering Conference
More informationPresidential Executive Order on Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure
Presidential Executive Order on Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure EXECUTIVE ORDER [13800] - - - - - - - STRENGTHENING THE CYBERSECURITY OF FEDERAL NETWORKS
More informationQuality Collaboration Across Government and Industry in a Time of Profound Changes
Quality Collaboration Across Government and Industry in a Time of Profound Changes 2018 CQSDI March 12 2018 Todd Nygren Corporate Chief Engineer 2018 The Aerospace Corporation Compelling Time of Change
More informationTHE AUTOMATED TEST FRAMEWORK
2017 THE AUTOMATED TEST FRAMEWORK Test More. Test Consistently. Test Faster. Secure Results. Delivered. xceleratesolutions.com TABLE OF CONTENTS CONCEPT...3 BENEFITS...4 TRANSFORMING FROM TRADITIONAL TO
More informationPresidential Documents
Federal Register Vol. 84, No. 61 Friday, March 29, 2019 Presidential Documents 12041 Title 3 Executive Order 13865 of March 26, 2019 The President Coordinating National Resilience to Electromagnetic Pulses
More informationSTRENGTHENING THE CYBERSECURITY OF FEDERAL NETWORKS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
STRENGTHENING THE CYBERSECURITY OF FEDERAL NETWORKS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby
More informationYour Challenge. Our Priority.
Your Challenge. Our Priority. Building trust and Confidence. When Federal managers and military leaders face tough challenges in cyber, data collection & analytics, enterprise IT or systems and software
More informationCybersecurity. Securely enabling transformation and change
Cybersecurity Securely enabling transformation and change Contents... Cybersecurity overview Business drivers Cybersecurity strategy and roadmap Cybersecurity in practice CGI s cybersecurity offering Why
More informationCybersecurity in Acquisition
Kristen J. Baldwin Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering (DASD(SE)) Federal Cybersecurity Summit September 15, 2016 Sep 15, 2016 Page-1 Acquisition program activities must
More informationCYBER RESILIENCE & INCIDENT RESPONSE
CYBER RESILIENCE & INCIDENT RESPONSE www.nccgroup.trust Introduction The threat landscape has changed dramatically over the last decade. Once the biggest threats came from opportunist attacks and preventable
More informationGeneral Framework for Secure IoT Systems
General Framework for Secure IoT Systems National center of Incident readiness and Strategy for Cybersecurity (NISC) Government of Japan August 26, 2016 1. General Framework Objective Internet of Things
More informationDoug Couto Texas A&M Transportation Technology Conference 2017 College Station, Texas May 4, 2017
Cyber Concerns of Local Government and What Does It Mean to Transportation Doug Couto Texas A&M Transportation Technology Conference 2017 College Station, Texas May 4, 2017 Transportation and Infrastructure
More information