Resource Access Protocols
|
|
- Brendan Allison
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Blocking Problem Resource Access Protocols Now we remove the assumption that tasks are independent, sharing resources, t interacting The main problem: priority inversion igh priority tasks are blocked by lower priority tasks The main sources of priority inversion: Non preemptable sections (we mentioned this earlier) Sharing resources Synchronization and mutual exclusion The response time calculation should be modified 2 Contents The simpliest form of priority inversion Priority inversion phemen Resource access protocols ighest Priority Inheritance Non preemption protocol (NPP) Immedate Priority Inheritance ighest ocker s priority Protocol (P) Ada95 (protected object) and POSIX mutexes Shared Resource R Resource access By semaphore Basic Priority Inheritance Protocol (BIP) POSIX (RT OS standard) mutexes Priority Ceiling Protocols (PCP) Blocking and response time analysis computing using R blocked 3 4 Unbounded priority inversion Solutions Shared Resource R Resource access by semaphore computing Tasks are forced to follow certain rules when locking and unlocking semaphores (requesting and releasing resources) The rules are called Resource access protocols NPP, BIP, P, PCP A common rule of these protocols: tasks must release all semaphores before the next instance; when a task finishes executing, it must have released all semaphores using R blocked 5 6
2 Non Preemption Protocol (NPP) odify so that the caller is assigned the highest priority if it succeeds in locking S ighest priority=n preemtion! odify so that the caller is assigned its own priority back when it releases S This is the simplest method to avoid Priority Inversion! The equation for response time calculation: Ri= Bi + Ci + j P(i) Ri/Tj *Cj Where Bi is the longest time that task i can be blocked by lowerpriority tasks with n preemptive section Exercise ()Show the runtime schedules with(out) NPP (2) Calculate the worst case response times (te that R=85) T T2 T3 C T Blocking NPP: + and Simple and to implement (+), how? Deadlock free (++), why? Number of blocking = (+), Why? Allow lowpriority tasks to block highpriority tasks including those that have sharing resources () P(s) issinig all deadlines! V(s) Basic Priority Inheritance Protocol (BIP) supported in RT POSIX Idea: A gets semaphore S B with higher priority tries to lock S, and blocked by S B transfers its priority to A (so A is resumed and run with B s priority) Run time behaviour: whenever a lowerpriotity task blocks a higher priority task, it inherits the priority of the blocked task 9 Example Property/Problem : potential deadlock Task 3 Deadlock! Running with pr Blocked Using S Using S2 : :
3 Property/Problem 2: chained blocking ( needs resources may be blocked times) SCB to implement BIP Semaphores Control Block for PIP counter queue Task 3 Pointer to next SCB experiences Chainedblocking by and! Blocked Using S Using S2 older 3 4 Standard Poperation (without BIP) P(scb): Disableinterrupt; If scb.counter>0 then {scb.counter ; else {savecontext( ); currenttask.state := blocked; insert(currenttask, scb.queue); dispatch(); loadcontext() } Enableinterrupt Poperation with BIP P(scb): Disableinterrupt; If scb.counter>0 then {scb.counter ; scb.holder:= currenttask add(currenttask.semlist,scb)} else {savecontext( ); currenttask.state := blocked; insert(currenttask, scb.queue); /*queue sorted according to task priority? */ save(scb.holder.priotiry); scb.holder.priority := currenttask.priority; dispatch(); loadcontext() } Enableinterrupt 5 6 Standard Voperation (without BIP) Voperation with BIP V(scb): Disableinterrupt; If tempty(scb.queue) then { nexttorun := getfirst(scb.queue); nexttorun.state := ready; insert(nexttorun, readyqueue); savecontext(); schedule(); /* dispatch invoked*/ loadcontext() } else scb.counter ++; Enableinterrupt V(scb): Disableinterrupt; currenttask.priority := original/prvious priority /* highestpriority of tasks blocked by smaphors ownd by currenttask*/ /* check all blocked tasks waiting for sem in currenttcb.semlist*/ If tempty(scb.queue) then { nexttorun := getfirst(scb.queue); /*queue sorted according to task priority? */ nexttorun.state := ready; scb.holder := nexttorun; add(nexttorun.semlist, scb); insert(nexttorun, readyqueue); savecontext(); schedule(); /* dispatch invoked*/ loadcontext() } else scb.counter ++; Enableinterrupt 7 8
4 Properties of BIP: + and Bounded Priority inversion (+) Reasonable Runtime performance (+) Require info on resource usage of tasks (+) potential deadlock, the same reason as in OS () It may cause chainblocking (a task needs semaphores may be blocked times!): why, example? () Complicated to compute the maximal blocking times and response times () Immediate Priority Inheritance: =ighest ocker s Priority Protocol (P) =Priority Protect Protocol (PPP) Adopted in Ada95 (protected object), POSIX mutexes Idea: define the ceiling C(S) of a semaphore S to be the highest priority of all tasks that use S during execution. Note that C(S) can be calculated statically (offline) Runtime behaviour of P Example Whenever a task succeeds in holding a semaphor S, its priority is changed dynamically to the maximum of its current priority and C(S). When it finishes with S, it sets its priority back to what it was before Task 3 priority use S3 S, S S, S2 C(S)= C(S2)= C(S3)= C(S)= Task 4 ower S2, S 2 22 Example: ighest ocker s Priority Protocol Property : Deadlock free (P) and ower share S New release computing blocked using resource released ower 23 Once task 2 gets S, it runs with pri, task will be blocked ( chance to get S2 before task 2) 24
5 Property 2: Tasks will be blocked at most once Ready and blocked Ready and blocked P: Response Time Analysis et CS(k,S) dete the computing time for the critical section that task k uses semaphore S. Use(S) is the set of tasks using S Then the maximal blocking time B and response time Ri for task i is as follows: B =max{cs(k,s) i,k in Use(S), pr(k)<pr(i)<=c(s)} Ri= B + Ci + j P(i) Ri/Tj *Cj Implementation of P Calculate the ceiling for all semaphores odify SCB odify P and Voperations SCB to implement P Semaphores Control Block for P counter queue Pointer to next SCB Ceiling Poperation with P P(scb): Disableinterrupt; If scb.counter>0 then { scb.counter ; save(currenttask.priority); currenttask.priority := C(scb) } else {savecontext(); currenttask.state := blocked insert(currenttask, scb.queue); dispatch(); loadcontext() } Enableinterrupt Voperation with P V(scb): Disableinterrupt; currenttask.priority := get(previouspriority) If tempty(scb.queue) then nexttorun := getfirst(scb.queue); nexttorun.state := ready; nexttorun.priority := C(scb); insert(nexttorun, readyqueue); savecontext(); schedule(); /* dispatch invoked*/ loadcontext(); end then else scb.counter ++; end else Enableinterrupt 29 30
6 Properties of P: + and Summary Bounded priority inversion Deadlock free (+), Why? Number of blocking = (+), Why? P is a simplified version of PCP (priority ceiling protocol, with the same worst case blocking time as PCP (+) The extreme case of P=NPP () E.g when the highest priority task uses all semaphores (even only once in its whole life), the lower priority tasks will inherit the highest priority Bounded Priority Inversion Avoid deadlock Avoid Unnecessary blocking Blocking time calculalation NPP Easy BIP hard P / 3 32 Priority Ceiling Protocol (combining P and BIP) Each semaphore S has a Ceiling C(S) = the priority of the highest priority task that can lock S Runtime behaviour: Assume that S is the semaphore with highest ceiling locked by other tasks currently If a task A wants to lock a semaphore (t necessarily S), it must have a strictly higher priority than the ceilings of all semaphors locked by other tasks, i.e. P(A) > C(S). Otherwise A is blocked, and it transmitts its priority(+ε) to the task currently holding S PCP: Response Time Analysis (precisely the same as P) et CS(k,S) dete the computing time for the critical section that task k uses semaphore S. Use(S) is the set of tasks using S Then the maximal blocking time B and response time Ri for task i is as follows: B=max{CS(k,S) i,k in Use(S), pr(k)<pr(i)<=c(s)} Ri= B + Ci + j P(i) Ri/Tj *Cj Example: PCP Example: PCP Task A Task B Task C C D T 50 Priority Task A Task B Task C C C(S)= C(S2)=C(S3)= D T 50 Priority A:... B:...P(S3)...V(S3)... C:...P(S3)...V(S3) A:... B:...P(S3)...V(S3)... C:...P(S3)...V(S3) Thus: C(S)= C(S2)=C(S3)= B arrives P(S3) Blocked on S3 Get S2 P(S3) V(S3) V(S3) 35 Run with B s priority (+ε) Run with its own priority 36
7 Exercise: implementation of PCP Implement P,Voperations that follow PCP Properties of PCP: + and Bounded priority inversion (+) Deadlock free (+) Number of blocking = (+) Better response times for high priority tasks (+) Avoid unnecessary blocking Not to implement () Summary NPP BIP P PCP Bounded Priority Inversion Avoid deadlock Avoid Unnecessary blocking / Blocking time calculalation hard Number of blocking > Implementation hard 39
Resource Sharing and Priority Ceiling Protocols
Resource Sharing and Priority Ceiling Protocols 1 A classic paper on realtime systems L. Sha, R. Rajkumar, and J. P. Lehoczky, Priority Inheritance Protocols: An Approach to RealTime Synchronization. In
More informationSchedulability with resource sharing. Priority inheritance protocol Priority ceiling protocol Stack resource policy
Schedulability with resource sharing Priority inheritance protocol Priority ceiling protocol Stack resource policy 1 Lecture overview We have discussed the occurrence of unbounded priority inversion We
More informationVerification of Real-Time Systems Resource Sharing
Verification of Real-Time Systems Resource Sharing Jan Reineke Advanced Lecture, Summer 2015 Resource Sharing So far, we have assumed sets of independent tasks. However, tasks may share resources to communicate
More informationOperating System Provides
Today s topic: RTOS 1 Operating System Provides Hardware abstraction layer Interrupt processing Device drivers: I/O Libraries - 10 times bigger than a minimal OS E.g. the firmware on an automotive ECU
More informationMicrokernel/OS and Real-Time Scheduling
Chapter 12 Microkernel/OS and Real-Time Scheduling Hongwei Zhang http://www.cs.wayne.edu/~hzhang/ Ack.: this lecture is prepared in part based on slides of Lee, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, Seshia. Outline
More informationThe Priority Ceiling Protocol: A Method for Minimizing the Blocking of High-Priority Ada Tasks
Special Report CMU/SEI-88-SR-4 The Priority Ceiling Protocol: A Method for Minimizing the Blocking of High-Priority Ada Tasks John B. Goodenough Lui Sha March 1988 Special Report CMU/SEI-88-SR-4 March
More informationAn Evaluation of the Dynamic and Static Multiprocessor Priority Ceiling Protocol and the Multiprocessor Stack Resource Policy in an SMP System
An Evaluation of the Dynamic and Static Multiprocessor Priority Ceiling Protocol and the Multiprocessor Stack Resource Policy in an SMP System Jim Ras and Albert Mo Kim Cheng Outline Handling shared resources
More informationResource Access Control in Real-Time Systems. Resource Access Control in Real-Time Systems
CPSC663: RealTime Systems Resource Access Control in RealTime Systems Resources, Resource Access, and How Things Can Go Wrong: The Mars Pathfinder Incident Resources, Critical Sections, Blocking Priority
More informationDeadlock. Lecture 4: Synchronization & Communication - Part 2. Necessary conditions. Deadlock handling. Hierarchical resource allocation
Lecture 4: Synchronization & ommunication - Part 2 [RTS h 4] Deadlock Priority Inversion & Inheritance Mailbox ommunication ommunication with Objects Deadlock Improper allocation of common resources may
More informationIntroduction to Embedded Systems
Introduction to Embedded Systems Sanjit A. Seshia UC Berkeley EECS 9/9A Fall 0 008-0: E. A. Lee, A. L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, S. A. Seshia. All rights reserved. Chapter : Operating Systems, Microkernels,
More informationReal-Time Systems Resource Access Protocols
Real-Time Systems Resource Access Protocols WS 2016/17 Problems: Priority Inversion Assumptions: Jobs use resources in a mutually exclusive manner Preemptive priority-driven scheduling Fixed task priorities
More informationProcess Synchronization: Semaphores. CSSE 332 Operating Systems Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Process Synchronization: Semaphores CSSE 332 Operating Systems Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Critical-section problem solution 1. Mutual Exclusion - If process Pi is executing in its critical section,
More informationEECS 571 Principles of Real-Time Embedded Systems. Lecture Note #10: More on Scheduling and Introduction of Real-Time OS
EECS 571 Principles of Real-Time Embedded Systems Lecture Note #10: More on Scheduling and Introduction of Real-Time OS Kang G. Shin EECS Department University of Michigan Mode Changes Changes in mission
More informationCS4514 Real Time Scheduling
CS4514 Real Time Scheduling Jose M. Garrido Fall 2015 Department of Computer Science 1 Periodic Tasks Typical real-time application has many tasks that need to be executed periodically Reading sensor data
More informationResource management. Real-Time Systems. Resource management. Resource management
Real-Time Systems Specification Implementation Verification Mutual exclusion is a general problem that exists at several levels in a real-time system. Shared resources internal to the the run-time system:
More informationAn Improved Priority Ceiling Protocol to Reduce Context Switches in Task Synchronization 1
An Improved Priority Ceiling Protocol to Reduce Context Switches in Task Synchronization 1 Albert M.K. Cheng and Fan Jiang Computer Science Department University of Houston Houston, TX, 77204, USA http://www.cs.uh.edu
More informationCS450/550 Operating Systems
CS450/550 Operating Systems Lecture 3 Deadlocks Dr. Xiaobo Zhou Department of Computer Science CS450/550 Deadlocks.1 Review: Summary of Chapter 2 Sequential process model Multi-threading: user-space vs.
More informationReal-time operating systems and scheduling
Real-time operating systems and scheduling Problem 21 Consider a real-time operating system (OS) that has a built-in preemptive scheduler. Each task has a unique priority and the lower the priority id,
More informationWhat is the Race Condition? And what is its solution? What is a critical section? And what is the critical section problem?
What is the Race Condition? And what is its solution? Race Condition: Where several processes access and manipulate the same data concurrently and the outcome of the execution depends on the particular
More informationProcess/Thread Synchronization
CSE325 Principles of Operating Systems Process/Thread Synchronization David Duggan dduggan@sandia.gov February 14, 2013 Reading Assignment 7 Chapter 7 Deadlocks, due 2/21 2/14/13 CSE325: Synchronization
More informationFinal Examination. Thursday, December 3, :20PM 620 PM. NAME: Solutions to Selected Problems ID:
CSE 237B EMBEDDED SOFTWARE, FALL 2009 PROF. RAJESH GUPTA Final Examination Thursday, December 3, 2009 5:20PM 620 PM NAME: Solutions to Selected Problems ID: Problem Max. Points Points 1 20 2 25 3 35 4
More informationPriority Based Assignment of Shared resources in RTOS
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Priority Based Assignment of Shared resources in RTOS Ms. Raana Syeda*, Ms. Manju Ahuja**, Ms. Sneha Khatwani*** Mrs. Swara Pampatwar**** *(Department of Computer Science &
More informationOperating systems and concurrency (B10)
Operating systems and concurrency (B10) David Kendall Northumbria University David Kendall (Northumbria University) Operating systems and concurrency (B10) 1 / 26 Introduction This lecture looks at Some
More informationReal-Time Systems. Lecture #4. Professor Jan Jonsson. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers University of Technology
Real-Time Systems Lecture #4 Professor Jan Jonsson Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers University of Technology Real-Time Systems Specification Resource management Mutual exclusion
More informationCS A331 Programming Language Concepts
CS A331 Programming Language Concepts Lecture 12 Alternative Language Examples (General Concurrency Issues and Concepts) March 30, 2014 Sam Siewert Major Concepts Concurrent Processing Processes, Tasks,
More informationProcess/Thread Synchronization
CSE325 Principles of Operating Systems Process/Thread Synchronization David Duggan dduggan@sandia.gov March 1, 2011 The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image,
More informationReal-Time Concurrency Control in a Multiprocessor Environment
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, VOL. 13, NO. 6, JUNE 2002 659 Real-Time Concurrency Control in a Multiprocessor Environment Tei-Wei Kuo, Member, IEEE, Jun Wu, and Hsin-Chia Hsih
More informationOverview. Sporadic tasks. Recall. Aperiodic tasks. Real-time Systems D0003E 2/26/2009. Loosening D = T. Aperiodic tasks. Response-time analysis
Overview Real-time Systems D0003E Lecture 11: Priority inversion Burns/Wellings ch. 13 (except 13.12) Aperiodic tasks Response time analysis Blocking Priority inversion Priority inheritance Priority ceiling
More informationEE458 - Embedded Systems Lecture 8 Semaphores
EE458 - Embedded Systems Lecture 8 Semaphores Outline Introduction to Semaphores Binary and Counting Semaphores Mutexes Typical Applications RTEMS Semaphores References RTC: Chapter 6 CUG: Chapter 9 1
More informationCS370 Operating Systems
CS370 Operating Systems Colorado State University Yashwant K Malaiya Fall 2017 Lecture 11 Slides based on Text by Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne Various sources 1 1 FAQ Multilevel Feedback Queue: Q0, Q1,
More informationAnalyzing Real-Time Systems
Analyzing Real-Time Systems Reference: Burns and Wellings, Real-Time Systems and Programming Languages 17-654/17-754: Analysis of Software Artifacts Jonathan Aldrich Real-Time Systems Definition Any system
More informationIntroduction to Embedded Systems
Introduction to Embedded Systems Edward A. Lee & Sanjit Seshia UC Berkeley EECS Spring 008 Copyright 008, Edward A. Lee & Sanjit Seshia, All rights reserved Lecture 0: Scheduling Anomalies Source This
More informationMidterm Exam Amy Murphy 19 March 2003
University of Rochester Midterm Exam Amy Murphy 19 March 2003 Computer Systems (CSC2/456) Read before beginning: Please write clearly. Illegible answers cannot be graded. Be sure to identify all of your
More informationChapter 6: Process Synchronization
Chapter 6: Process Synchronization Chapter 6: Synchronization 6.1 Background 6.2 The Critical-Section Problem 6.3 Peterson s Solution 6.4 Synchronization Hardware 6.5 Mutex Locks 6.6 Semaphores 6.7 Classic
More informationCS A320 Operating Systems for Engineers
CS A320 Operating Systems for Engineers Lecture 4 Conclusion of MOS Chapter 2 September 18, 2013 Sam Siewert Many Ways to Schedule a CPU Core We ve Come a Long way Since Batch Scheduling Sam Siewert 2
More informationCSC Operating Systems Spring Lecture - XII Midterm Review. Tevfik Ko!ar. Louisiana State University. March 4 th, 2008.
CSC 4103 - Operating Systems Spring 2008 Lecture - XII Midterm Review Tevfik Ko!ar Louisiana State University March 4 th, 2008 1 I/O Structure After I/O starts, control returns to user program only upon
More informationChapter 5: Process Synchronization. Operating System Concepts Essentials 2 nd Edition
Chapter 5: Process Synchronization Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne 2013 Chapter 5: Process Synchronization Background The Critical-Section Problem Peterson s Solution Synchronization Hardware Mutex Locks
More informationC09: Process Synchronization
CISC 7310X C09: Process Synchronization Hui Chen Department of Computer & Information Science CUNY Brooklyn College 3/29/2018 CUNY Brooklyn College 1 Outline Race condition and critical regions The bounded
More informationDUH! Deadlocks. Concurrency Issues. The TENEX Case. If a process requests all systems buffers, operator console tries to print an error message
1 Concurrency Issues Past lectures: Problem: Safely coordinate access to shared resource Solutions: Use semaphores, monitors, locks, condition variables Coordinate access within shared objects Deadlocks
More informationIntroduction to Real-Time Operating Systems
Introduction to Real-Time Operating Systems GPOS vs RTOS General purpose operating systems Real-time operating systems GPOS vs RTOS: Similarities Multitasking Resource management OS services to applications
More informationHardware Support for Priority Inheritance
Hardware Support for Priority Inheritance Bilge. S. Akgul +, Vincent J. Mooney +, Henrik Thane* and Pramote Kuacharoen + + Center for Research on mbedded Systems and Technology (CRST) + School of lectrical
More informationReal-Time Programming
Real-Time Programming Week 7: Real-Time Operating Systems Instructors Tony Montiel & Ken Arnold rtp@hte.com 4/1/2003 Co Montiel 1 Objectives o Introduction to RTOS o Event Driven Systems o Synchronization
More informationSemaphore. Originally called P() and V() wait (S) { while S <= 0 ; // no-op S--; } signal (S) { S++; }
Semaphore Semaphore S integer variable Two standard operations modify S: wait() and signal() Originally called P() and V() Can only be accessed via two indivisible (atomic) operations wait (S) { while
More informationOperating Systems Comprehensive Exam. Spring Student ID # 3/16/2006
Operating Systems Comprehensive Exam Spring 2006 Student ID # 3/16/2006 You must complete all of part I (60%) You must complete two of the three sections in part II (20% each) In Part I, circle or select
More informationDeterministic Futexes Revisited
A. Zuepke Deterministic Futexes Revisited Alexander Zuepke, Robert Kaiser first.last@hs-rm.de A. Zuepke Futexes Futexes: underlying mechanism for thread synchronization in Linux libc provides: Mutexes
More informationEMERALDS: a small-memory real-time microkernel
EMERALDS: a small-memory real-time microkernel By Khawar M. Zuberi, Padmanabhan Pillai, and Kang G. Shin 4/28/2005 CMSC 691S Real-Time Systems 1 Outline Introduction Requirements EMERALDS Overview CSD
More informationUNIT:2. Process Management
1 UNIT:2 Process Management SYLLABUS 2.1 Process and Process management i. Process model overview ii. Programmers view of process iii. Process states 2.2 Process and Processor Scheduling i Scheduling Criteria
More informationEmbedded Systems. 5. Operating Systems. Lothar Thiele. Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory
Embedded Systems 5. Operating Systems Lothar Thiele Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory Embedded Operating Systems 5 2 Embedded Operating System (OS) Why an operating system (OS) at all? Same
More informationA Fully Preemptive Multiprocessor Semaphore Protocol for Latency-Sensitive Real-Time Applications
A Fully Preemptive Multiprocessor Semaphore Protocol for Latency-Sensitive Real-Time Applications ECRTS 13 July 12, 2013 Björn B. bbb@mpi-sws.org A Rhetorical Question On uniprocessors, why do we use the
More informationDealing with Issues for Interprocess Communication
Dealing with Issues for Interprocess Communication Ref Section 2.3 Tanenbaum 7.1 Overview Processes frequently need to communicate with other processes. In a shell pipe the o/p of one process is passed
More informationCS370 Operating Systems
CS370 Operating Systems Colorado State University Yashwant K Malaiya Spring 1018 L11 Synchronization Slides based on Text by Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne Various sources 1 1 FAQ Multilevel feedback queue:
More informationBack to RTOS. CSE466 Autumn 00-1
Back to RTOS Scheduling Deadline Laxity Rate Monotonic Shared Code in Multiprocessing Share Resources: Deadlock avoidance Process Synchronization and Communication Memory Management CSE466 Autumn 00-1
More informationCEC 450 Real-Time Systems
CEC 450 Real-Time Systems Lecture 7 Review October 9, 2017 Sam Siewert Coming Next Finish Up with Recount of Mars Pathfinder and Unbounded Priority Inversion Mike Jone s Page (Microsoft) Glenn Reeves on
More informationBachelor Thesis. Analyzing and Implementing Resource Synchronization Protocols on RTEMS in Multi-core Systems. Nadzeya Liabiodka Juni, 2017
Bachelor Thesis Analyzing and Implementing Resource Synchronization Protocols on RTEMS in Multi-core Systems Nadzeya Liabiodka Juni, 2017 Advisors: Prof. Dr. Jian-Jia Chen M.Sc. Kuan-Hsun Chen Faculty
More informationExam Review TexPoint fonts used in EMF.
Exam Review Generics Definitions: hard & soft real-time Task/message classification based on criticality and invocation behavior Why special performance measures for RTES? What s deadline and where is
More informationReview. Preview. Three Level Scheduler. Scheduler. Process behavior. Effective CPU Scheduler is essential. Process Scheduling
Review Preview Mutual Exclusion Solutions with Busy Waiting Test and Set Lock Priority Inversion problem with busy waiting Mutual Exclusion with Sleep and Wakeup The Producer-Consumer Problem Race Condition
More informationComparison of soft real-time CPU scheduling in Linux kernel 2.6 series with Solaris 10
Comparison of soft real-time CPU scheduling in Linux kernel 2.6 series with Solaris 10 Kristoffer Eriksson Philip Frising Department of Computer and Information Science Linköping University 1(15) 1. About
More informationLesson 6: Process Synchronization
Lesson 6: Process Synchronization Chapter 5: Process Synchronization Background The Critical-Section Problem Peterson s Solution Synchronization Hardware Mutex Locks Semaphores Classic Problems of Synchronization
More informationCS 571 Operating Systems. Midterm Review. Angelos Stavrou, George Mason University
CS 571 Operating Systems Midterm Review Angelos Stavrou, George Mason University Class Midterm: Grading 2 Grading Midterm: 25% Theory Part 60% (1h 30m) Programming Part 40% (1h) Theory Part (Closed Books):
More informationTasks. Task Implementation and management
Tasks Task Implementation and management Tasks Vocab Absolute time - real world time Relative time - time referenced to some event Interval - any slice of time characterized by start & end times Duration
More informationSynchronization Principles I
CSC 256/456: Operating Systems Synchronization Principles I John Criswell University of Rochester 1 Synchronization Principles Background Concurrent access to shared data may result in data inconsistency.
More information* There are more than 100 hundred commercial RTOS with memory footprints from few hundred kilobytes to large multiprocessor systems
Presented material is based on ü Laura Carnevali: Formal Methods in the Development Life Cycle of Realtime Systems. PhD-Thesis, Univ. of Florence (IT) 2010. (Ch. 1.1-1.3) ü Doug Abbott: Linux for Embedded
More informationChapter 6: Synchronization. Chapter 6: Synchronization. 6.1 Background. Part Three - Process Coordination. Consumer. Producer. 6.
Part Three - Process Coordination Chapter 6: Synchronization 6.1 Background Concurrent access to shared data may result in data inconsistency Maintaining data consistency requires mechanisms to ensure
More informationCS420: Operating Systems. Process Synchronization
Process Synchronization James Moscola Department of Engineering & Computer Science York College of Pennsylvania Based on Operating System Concepts, 9th Edition by Silberschatz, Galvin, Gagne Background
More informationChapter 5: Process Synchronization. Operating System Concepts 9 th Edition
Chapter 5: Process Synchronization Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne 2013 Chapter 5: Process Synchronization Background The Critical-Section Problem Peterson s Solution Synchronization Hardware Mutex Locks
More informationOperating Systems: Quiz2 December 15, Class: No. Name:
Operating Systems: Quiz2 December 15, 2006 Class: No. Name: Part I (30%) Multiple Choice Each of the following questions has only one correct answer. Fill the correct one in the blank in front of each
More informationOperating Systems. Designed and Presented by Dr. Ayman Elshenawy Elsefy
Operating Systems Designed and Presented by Dr. Ayman Elshenawy Elsefy Dept. of Systems & Computer Eng.. AL-AZHAR University Website : eaymanelshenawy.wordpress.com Email : eaymanelshenawy@yahoo.com Reference
More informationReducing Priority Inversion in Interprocessor Synchronization on a Fixed-Priority Bus
Reducing Priority Inversion in Interprocessor Synchronization on a Fixed-Priority Bus Chi-Sing Chen (cschen@cs.fsu.edu) Pratit Santiprabhob (pratit@cs.fsu.edu) T.P. Baker (baker@cs.fsu.edu) Department
More informationChapter 5: Synchronization 1
1 Start of Lecture: January 25, 2014 2 Reminders Assignment 1 is due this Friday at 6:00 p.m. Couple comments about Exercise 1: Thought questions: be honest and sincere about questions you have while reading;
More information(b) External fragmentation can happen in a virtual memory paging system.
Alexandria University Faculty of Engineering Electrical Engineering - Communications Spring 2015 Final Exam CS333: Operating Systems Wednesday, June 17, 2015 Allowed Time: 3 Hours Maximum: 75 points Note:
More informationResource Access Control (2) Real-Time and Embedded Systems (M) Lecture 14
Resource Access Control (2) Real-Time and Embedded Systems (M) Lecture 14 Lecture Outline Resources access control (cont d): Enhancing the priority ceiling protocol Stack-based priority ceiling protocol
More informationImplementing Sporadic Servers in Ada
Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-6 ESD-90-TR-207 Implementing Sporadic Servers in Ada Brinkley Sprunt Lui Sha May 1990 Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-6 ESD-90-TR-207 May 1990 Implementing Sporadic Servers
More informationIntegrating Real-Time Synchronization Schemes into Preemption Threshold Scheduling
Integrating Real-Time Synchronization Schemes into Preemption Threshold Scheduling Saehwa Kim, Seongsoo Hong and Tae-Hyung Kim {ksaehwa, sshong}@redwood.snu.ac.kr, tkim@cse.hanyang.ac.kr Abstract Preemption
More informationInterprocess Communication By: Kaushik Vaghani
Interprocess Communication By: Kaushik Vaghani Background Race Condition: A situation where several processes access and manipulate the same data concurrently and the outcome of execution depends on the
More informationProcess Synchronisation (contd.) Operating Systems. Autumn CS4023
Operating Systems Autumn 2017-2018 Outline Process Synchronisation (contd.) 1 Process Synchronisation (contd.) Synchronization Hardware 6.4 (SGG) Many systems provide hardware support for critical section
More informationLecture 3. Introduction to Real-Time kernels. Real-Time Systems
Real-Time Systems Lecture 3 Introduction to Real-Time kernels Task States Generic architecture of Real-Time kernels Typical structures and functions of Real-Time kernels Last lecture (2) Computational
More informationEmbedded Software Programming
Embedded Software Programming Computer Science & Engineering Department Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287 Dr. Yann-Hang Lee yhlee@asu.edu (480) 727-7507 Event and Time-Driven Threads taskspawn (name,
More informationReal Time Operating System Support for Concurrency
Real Time Operating System Support for Concurrency Colin Perkins teaching/2003-2004/rtes4/lecture13.pdf Lecture Outline Resources and Resource access control Synchronisation and Locking Implementing priority
More informationAUTOSAR Extensions for Predictable Task Synchronization in Multi- Core ECUs
11AE-0089 AUTOSAR Extensions for Predictable Task Synchronization in Multi- Core ECUs Copyright 2011 SAE International Karthik Lakshmanan, Gaurav Bhatia, Ragunathan (Raj) Rajkumar Carnegie Mellon University
More informationConcurrent Programming Synchronisation. CISTER Summer Internship 2017
1 Concurrent Programming Synchronisation CISTER Summer Internship 2017 Luís Nogueira lmn@isep.ipp.pt 2 Introduction Multitasking Concept of overlapping the computation of a program with another one Central
More informationProcess & Thread Management II. Queues. Sleep() and Sleep Queues CIS 657
Process & Thread Management II CIS 657 Queues Run queues: hold threads ready to execute Not a single ready queue; 64 queues All threads in same queue are treated as same priority Sleep queues: hold threads
More informationProcess & Thread Management II CIS 657
Process & Thread Management II CIS 657 Queues Run queues: hold threads ready to execute Not a single ready queue; 64 queues All threads in same queue are treated as same priority Sleep queues: hold threads
More informationEmbedded Systems. 6. Real-Time Operating Systems
Embedded Systems 6. Real-Time Operating Systems Lothar Thiele 6-1 Contents of Course 1. Embedded Systems Introduction 2. Software Introduction 7. System Components 10. Models 3. Real-Time Models 4. Periodic/Aperiodic
More informationCIS Operating Systems Application of Semaphores. Professor Qiang Zeng Spring 2018
CIS 3207 - Operating Systems Application of Semaphores Professor Qiang Zeng Spring 2018 Big picture of synchronization primitives Busy-waiting Software solutions (Dekker, Bakery, etc.) Hardware-assisted
More informationReal-Time Scalability of Nested Spin Locks. Hiroaki Takada and Ken Sakamura. Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo
Real-Time Scalability of Nested Spin Locks Hiroaki Takada and Ken Sakamura Department of Information Science, Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan Abstract
More informationThe Deadlock Lecture
Concurrent systems Lecture 4: Deadlock, Livelock, and Priority Inversion DrRobert N. M. Watson The Deadlock Lecture 1 Reminder from last time Multi-Reader Single-Writer (MRSW) locks Alternatives to semaphores/locks:
More informationExam TI2720-C/TI2725-C Embedded Software
Exam TI2720-C/TI2725-C Embedded Software Wednesday April 16 2014 (18.30-21.30) Koen Langendoen In order to avoid misunderstanding on the syntactical correctness of code fragments in this examination, we
More informationOperating Systems. Lecture 4 - Concurrency and Synchronization. Master of Computer Science PUF - Hồ Chí Minh 2016/2017
Operating Systems Lecture 4 - Concurrency and Synchronization Adrien Krähenbühl Master of Computer Science PUF - Hồ Chí Minh 2016/2017 Mutual exclusion Hardware solutions Semaphores IPC: Message passing
More informationConcurrency Issues. Past lectures: What about coordinated access across multiple objects? Today s lecture:
Deadlock 1 Concurrency Issues Past lectures: Ø Problem: Safely coordinate access to shared resource Ø Solutions: Use semaphores, monitors, locks, condition variables Coordinate access within shared objects
More informationResource Sharing & Management
Resource Sharing & Management P.C.P Bhatt P.C.P Bhatt OS/M6/V1/2004 1 Introduction Some of the resources connected to a computer system (image processing resource) may be expensive. These resources may
More informationOperating Systems Structure
Operating Systems Structure Monolithic systems basic structure: A main program that invokes the requested service procedure. A set of service procedures that carry out the system calls. A set of utility
More informationProcess Synchronization(2)
CSE 3221.3 Operating System Fundamentals No.6 Process Synchronization(2) Prof. Hui Jiang Dept of Computer Science and Engineering York University Semaphores Problems with the software solutions. Not easy
More informationUnit 3 : Process Management
Unit : Process Management Processes are the most widely used units of computation in programming and systems, although object and threads are becoming more prominent in contemporary systems. Process management
More informationQuestions from last time
Questions from last time Pthreads vs regular thread? Pthreads are POSIX-standard threads (1995). There exist earlier and newer standards (C++11). Pthread is probably most common. Pthread API: about a 100
More informationReal-Time Systems and Programming Languages
Real-Time Systems and Programming Languages Ada, Real-Time Java and C/Real-Time POSIX Fourth Edition Alan Burns and Andy Wellings University of York * ADDISON-WESLEY An imprint of Pearson Education Harlow,
More informationTask Synchronization and Allocation for Many-Core Real-Time Systems
Task Synchronization and Allocation for Many-Core Real-Time Systems Pi-Cheng Hsiu 1,, Der-Nien Lee 3, and Tei-Wei Kuo 1,3,4 1 Research Center for Information Technology Innovation, Academia Sinica Institute
More informationA Flexible Multiprocessor Resource Sharing Framework for Ada
A Flexible Multiprocessor Resource Sharing Framework for Ada Shiyao Lin Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of York Department of Computer Science September 2013 Abstract Lock-based
More informationMultiprocessor and Real-Time Scheduling. Chapter 10
Multiprocessor and Real-Time Scheduling Chapter 10 1 Roadmap Multiprocessor Scheduling Real-Time Scheduling Linux Scheduling Unix SVR4 Scheduling Windows Scheduling Classifications of Multiprocessor Systems
More informationScheduling. CSC400 - Operating Systems. 7: Scheduling. J. Sumey. one of the main tasks of an OS. the scheduler / dispatcher
CSC400 - Operating Systems 7: Scheduling J. Sumey Scheduling one of the main tasks of an OS the scheduler / dispatcher concerned with deciding which runnable process/thread should get the CPU next occurs
More information