Key to Homework #8. (a) S aa A bs bbb (b) S AB aaab A aab aaaaaaab B bba bbbb

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Key to Homework #8. (a) S aa A bs bbb (b) S AB aaab A aab aaaaaaab B bba bbbb"

Transcription

1 Key to Homework #8 1. For each of the following context-free grammars (a) and (b) below, construct an LL(k) parser with minimum k according to the following guide lines (i) and (ii). (a) a b bbb (b) B aaab ab aaaaaaab B bba bbbb (i) Choose a typical string w from the language of the grammar, and write the parsing profile (i.e., sequence of configurations, see the lecture note for an example) that your parser will take to parse w. long this sequence of configurations, whenever your parser needs to look ahead, write a clear remark disclosing the minimum required look ahead length (i.e., the number of cells) and the reason why it needs to look ahead. (ii) Construct the parse table of your parser. nswer: (a) a b bbb (i) We choose w = ababbb, for which the parsing profile is We need 2 look ahead to choose one of the two rules for. ince there are ba, the parser applies b (q 0, ababbb, Z 0 ) (q 1, ababbb, Z 0 ) (q 1, ababbb, az 0 ) (q 1, babbb, Z 0 ) (q 1, babbb, bz 0 ) (q 1, abbb, Z 0 ) (q 1, abbb, az 0 ) (q 1, bbb, Z 0 ) (q 1, bbb, bbbz 0 )... (q 1, ε, Z 0 ) // The LL(2) parsing is successful. Here again we need 2 look ahead, and since it is bb, the parser applies rule bbb (ii) Parse table: 2 look ahead ba bb XX tack top b bbb a 1

2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) nswer: (b) B aaab ab aaaaaaab B bba bbbb (i) We choose w = aaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbaa, for which the parsing profile is The parser needs 4 look ahead to make sure that next a is generated by rule (1) or (2). ince there is no b at the end, the parser applies rule (1). 1 (q 0, aaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbaa, Z 0 ) (q 1, aaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbaa, Z 0 ) (q 1, aaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbaa, BZ 0 ) The parser needs 8 look ahead to choose proper rule between rules (3) and (4). ince there is no b at the end, the parser applies rule (3). (q 1, aaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbaa, abbz 0 ) (q 1, aaaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbaa, bbz 0 ) (q 1, aaaaaaaabbbbbbbbbaa, abbbz 0 ) The parser needs 8 look ahead to choose proper rule between rules (3) and (4). ince there is b at the end, the parser applies rule (4). (q 1, aaaaaaabbbbbbbbbaa, bbbz 0 ) (q 1, aaaaaaabbbbbbbbbaa, aaaaaaabbbbz 0 )..... (q 1, bbbbbbaa, BZ 0 ) It needs 5 look ahead to choose proper rule between rules (5) and (6). If 5 look ahead is bbbbb, apply rule (5), if it is bbbba, apply rule (6). (q 1, bbbbbbaa, bbaz 0 ) (q 1, bbbbbaa, BaZ 0 ) (q 1, bbbbbaa, bbaaz 0 ) (q 1, bbbbaa, BaaZ 0 ) (q 1, bbbbaa, bbbbaaz 0 ).... (q 1, ε, Z 0 ) 2

3 nswer (b)-(ii): Parse table for grammar B aaab ab aaaaaaab B bba bbbb tack top 8 look ahead aaabxxxx aaaaxxxx aaaaaaaa aaaaaaab bbbbbxxx bbbbaxxx aaab B ab aaaaaaab B bba bbbb 2. (a) Why the grammar G below is not LL(k) grammar (i.e., it is impossible to construct an LL(k) parser, for any constant k)? (b) Construct an LL(k) grammar G that generates the same language as the grammar G. (c) how the parse table of an LL(k) parser with minimum k for grammar G. G: ab abb ab c B abb d nswer: (a) The language of grammar G is {a i xb i x {c, d} }. Consider an LL(k) parser in the starting configuration with an input (q 1, aa.....acbb....b, Z 0 ). The parser should know that ab is the next rule applied for. However, the c at the center of the input which is the only information available for the decision can be located arbitrarily far away from the first a. It is impossible for the parser to see the c (or d) by looking some constant k cells ahead. Hence, G is not LL(k) grammar for any constant k. 3

4 (b) Construct an LL(k) grammar G that generates the same language as the grammar G. nswer: G : ab ab c d (c) how the parse table of an LL(k) parser with minimum k for grammar G. nswer: We examine how string aaacbbb can be parsed by an LL(k) parser. Clearly, the substring acb at the center of this string is generated by : ab followed by c. ll the other part of the string is generated by ab. The parser will use this property of the language. (q 0, aaacbbb, Z 0 ) (q 1, aaacbbb, Z 0 ) (q 1, aaacbbb, abz 0 ) (q 1, aacbbb, bz 0 ) (q 1, aacbbb, abbz 0 ) ince 2 look ahead is aa, apply ab. 2 look ahead is ac. pply ab 1 look ahead is c. pply rule c (q 1, acbbb, bbz 0 ) (q 1, acbbb, abbbz 0 ) (q 1, cbbb, bbbz 0 ) (q 1, cbbb, cbbbz 0 ).... (q 1, e, Z 0 ) Based on the above analysis, we can construct the following parse table for an LL(2) parser. 2 look ahead aa ac or ad cx dx tack top ab ab c d x: don t care 4

5 3. For each of the following context-free grammars (a) and (b) below, construct an LR(k) parser with minimum k according to the guide lines (i) and (ii) above in problem 1. (a) BC BC C aaa B aa C a (b) a a aaaaab (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) nswer: (a) BC BC C aaa B aa C a We choose w = aaaaaa, which involves the most production rules, and examine how an LR(k) parser can parse this string. tring w is derived according to the rightmost derivation as follows; BC Ba aaa aaaaaa. The parser will apply rules (4)(5)(6)(1) in this order which is the reverse order of the rightmost derivation. Here it needs 1 look ahead to see if there is no more a s such that rule (6) can be applicable. If 1 look ahead were blank, the parser should have applied rule (6). Here it needs 2 look ahead. ince it sees aa, the parser shifts the next a in onto the stack instead of applying rule (5). If there were only one a, rule (5) should ve been applied. (q 0, aaaaaa, Z 0 ) (q 1, aaaaaa, Z 0 ) (q 1, aaaaa, az 0 ) (q 1, aaaa, aaz 0 ) (q 1, aaa, aaaz 0 ) (q 1, aaa, Z 0 ) (q 1, aa, az 0 ) (q 1, a, aaz 0 ) (q 1, a, BZ 0 ) (q 1, ε, abz 0 ) (q 1, ε, CBZ 0 ) (q 1, ε, Z 0 ) 5

6 (ii) Parse table. 2 look ahead aa ab BB xx *tack top portion aaa aa a hift-in hift-in B C x : don t care B : blank BC BC C * tack top portion is depth 3. The bottom of stack symbol Z 0 is not include. 6

7 (1) (2) (3) nswer: (b) a a aaaaab (i): We choose w = aaaaaaaabaaaaab, which is derived as follows by the rightmost derivation; (1) (3) (1) (3) (2) a aaaaaab aaaaaaab aaaaaaabaaaaab aaaaaaaabaaaaab Now we examine how this string can be parsed according to the LR(k) strategy applying the sequence of rules in the reverse order of the rightmost derivation. The first target to be brought up to the stack top and reduced is the a generated by rule (2). This a is next to the left of the first aaaaab appearing in the input. o, the parser shift in the input until it sees aaaaab. When the first a of the input is shifted in, if there remains no symbols in the input, rule (2) should be applied. The parser looks aaaaab ahead, which implies that the a at the stack top should be reduced by applying rule (2). (q 0, aaaaaaaabaaaaab, Z 0 ).... (q 1, aaaaabaaaaab, aaaz 0 ) (q 1, aaaaabaaaaab, aaz 0 ).... (q 1, aaaaab, baaaaaaaz 0 ) (q 1, aaaaab, aaz 0 ) (q 1, aaaaab, az 0 )... (q 1, ε, baaaaaaz 0 ) (q 1, ε, az 0 ) (q 1, ε, Z 0 ) (ii) The reduction table: tack top portion a aaaaab 6 look ahead aaaaaa aaaaab hift-in xxxxxx BBBBBB a 7

8 4. (a) Why the grammar G below is not LR(k) grammar (i.e., it is impossible to construct an LR(k) parser, for any constant k)? (b) Construct an LR(k) grammar G such that it generates the same language as the grammar G. (c) how the parse table of an LR(k) parser with minimum k for grammar G. * Notice that in the grammar capital letters (,, B) are nonterminals and the lower case letters (t, h, i, s, a, m, e) are terminals. G: this Bthat same same B Bsame same nswer: (a) For the convenience of argument lets transform the grammar as shown below with the following substitution. this = b that = c same = a b Bc a a B Ba a This grammar is the same grammar shown in slide number 172 of the lecture note. Refer to this slide for the argument that it is impossible to construct an LR(k) parser. (b) G : same same this that (c) We can easily construct an LR(0) parser, which reads the input until this or that appear on the stack top portion, and begins reductions as the following example shows. Notice that the parser needs no look ahead information. (q 0, samesamethis, Z 0 ).... (q 1, ε, sihtemasemasz 0 ) (q 1, ε, emasemasz 0 ) (q 1, ε, emasz 0 ) (q 1, ε, emasz 0 ) (q 1, ε, Z 0 ) Parse table: tack top portion this that same same 0 look ahead x x: don t care 8

Parsing. For a given CFG G, parsing a string w is to check if w L(G) and, if it is, to find a sequence of production rules which derive w.

Parsing. For a given CFG G, parsing a string w is to check if w L(G) and, if it is, to find a sequence of production rules which derive w. Parsing For a given CFG G, parsing a string w is to check if w L(G) and, if it is, to find a sequence of production rules which derive w. Since, for a given language L, there are many grammars which generates

More information

CS453 : Shift Reduce Parsing Unambiguous Grammars LR(0) and SLR Parse Tables by Wim Bohm and Michelle Strout. CS453 Shift-reduce Parsing 1

CS453 : Shift Reduce Parsing Unambiguous Grammars LR(0) and SLR Parse Tables by Wim Bohm and Michelle Strout. CS453 Shift-reduce Parsing 1 CS453 : Shift Reduce Parsing Unambiguous Grammars LR(0) and SLR Parse Tables by Wim Bohm and Michelle Strout CS453 Shift-reduce Parsing 1 Plan for Today Finish PA1 this week Friday recitation: help with

More information

Chapter 4: Regular Expressions

Chapter 4: Regular Expressions CSI 3104 /Winter 2011: Introduction to Formal Languages What are the languages with a finite representation? We start with a simple and interesting class of such languages. Dr. Nejib Zaguia CSI3104-W11

More information

ITEC2620 Introduction to Data Structures

ITEC2620 Introduction to Data Structures ITEC2620 Introduction to Data Structures Lecture 9b Grammars I Overview How can a computer do Natural Language Processing? Grammar checking? Artificial Intelligence Represent knowledge so that brute force

More information

CHAPTER TWO LANGUAGES. Dr Zalmiyah Zakaria

CHAPTER TWO LANGUAGES. Dr Zalmiyah Zakaria CHAPTER TWO LANGUAGES By Dr Zalmiyah Zakaria Languages Contents: 1. Strings and Languages 2. Finite Specification of Languages 3. Regular Sets and Expressions Sept2011 Theory of Computer Science 2 Strings

More information

CS 2210 Sample Midterm. 1. Determine if each of the following claims is true (T) or false (F).

CS 2210 Sample Midterm. 1. Determine if each of the following claims is true (T) or false (F). CS 2210 Sample Midterm 1. Determine if each of the following claims is true (T) or false (F). F A language consists of a set of strings, its grammar structure, and a set of operations. (Note: a language

More information

Talen en Compilers. Johan Jeuring , period 2. January 17, Department of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University

Talen en Compilers. Johan Jeuring , period 2. January 17, Department of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University Talen en Compilers 2015-2016, period 2 Johan Jeuring Department of Information and Computing Sciences Utrecht University January 17, 2016 13. LR parsing 13-1 This lecture LR parsing Basic idea The LR(0)

More information

Lecture 7: Deterministic Bottom-Up Parsing

Lecture 7: Deterministic Bottom-Up Parsing Lecture 7: Deterministic Bottom-Up Parsing (From slides by G. Necula & R. Bodik) Last modified: Tue Sep 20 12:50:42 2011 CS164: Lecture #7 1 Avoiding nondeterministic choice: LR We ve been looking at general

More information

Automata Theory TEST 1 Answers Max points: 156 Grade basis: 150 Median grade: 81%

Automata Theory TEST 1 Answers Max points: 156 Grade basis: 150 Median grade: 81% Automata Theory TEST 1 Answers Max points: 156 Grade basis: 150 Median grade: 81% 1. (2 pts) See text. You can t be sloppy defining terms like this. You must show a bijection between the natural numbers

More information

Lecture 8: Deterministic Bottom-Up Parsing

Lecture 8: Deterministic Bottom-Up Parsing Lecture 8: Deterministic Bottom-Up Parsing (From slides by G. Necula & R. Bodik) Last modified: Fri Feb 12 13:02:57 2010 CS164: Lecture #8 1 Avoiding nondeterministic choice: LR We ve been looking at general

More information

EXAM. CS331 Compiler Design Spring Please read all instructions, including these, carefully

EXAM. CS331 Compiler Design Spring Please read all instructions, including these, carefully EXAM Please read all instructions, including these, carefully There are 7 questions on the exam, with multiple parts. You have 3 hours to work on the exam. The exam is open book, open notes. Please write

More information

Glynda, the good witch of the North

Glynda, the good witch of the North Strings and Languages It is always best to start at the beginning -- Glynda, the good witch of the North What is a Language? A language is a set of strings made of of symbols from a given alphabet. An

More information

Proof Techniques Alphabets, Strings, and Languages. Foundations of Computer Science Theory

Proof Techniques Alphabets, Strings, and Languages. Foundations of Computer Science Theory Proof Techniques Alphabets, Strings, and Languages Foundations of Computer Science Theory Proof By Case Enumeration Sometimes the most straightforward way to prove that a property holds for all elements

More information

BSCS Fall Mid Term Examination December 2012

BSCS Fall Mid Term Examination December 2012 PUNJAB UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY University of the Punjab Sheet No.: Invigilator Sign: BSCS Fall 2009 Date: 14-12-2012 Mid Term Examination December 2012 Student ID: Section: Morning

More information

LR(0) Parsing Summary. LR(0) Parsing Table. LR(0) Limitations. A Non-LR(0) Grammar. LR(0) Parsing Table CS412/CS413

LR(0) Parsing Summary. LR(0) Parsing Table. LR(0) Limitations. A Non-LR(0) Grammar. LR(0) Parsing Table CS412/CS413 LR(0) Parsing ummary C412/C41 Introduction to Compilers Tim Teitelbaum Lecture 10: LR Parsing February 12, 2007 LR(0) item = a production with a dot in RH LR(0) state = set of LR(0) items valid for viable

More information

Syntax Analysis: Context-free Grammars, Pushdown Automata and Parsing Part - 4. Y.N. Srikant

Syntax Analysis: Context-free Grammars, Pushdown Automata and Parsing Part - 4. Y.N. Srikant Syntax Analysis: Context-free Grammars, Pushdown Automata and Part - 4 Department of Computer Science and Automation Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560 012 NPTEL Course on Principles of Compiler

More information

UNIT III & IV. Bottom up parsing

UNIT III & IV. Bottom up parsing UNIT III & IV Bottom up parsing 5.0 Introduction Given a grammar and a sentence belonging to that grammar, if we have to show that the given sentence belongs to the given grammar, there are two methods.

More information

JNTUWORLD. Code No: R

JNTUWORLD. Code No: R Code No: R09220504 R09 SET-1 B.Tech II Year - II Semester Examinations, April-May, 2012 FORMAL LANGUAGES AND AUTOMATA THEORY (Computer Science and Engineering) Time: 3 hours Max. Marks: 75 Answer any five

More information

Monday, September 13, Parsers

Monday, September 13, Parsers Parsers Agenda Terminology LL(1) Parsers Overview of LR Parsing Terminology Grammar G = (Vt, Vn, S, P) Vt is the set of terminals Vn is the set of non-terminals S is the start symbol P is the set of productions

More information

Finite Automata Part Three

Finite Automata Part Three Finite Automata Part Three Friday Four Square! Today at 4:15PM, Outside Gates. Announcements Problem Set 4 due right now. Problem Set 5 out, due next Friday, November 2. Play around with finite automata

More information

Finite Automata Part Three

Finite Automata Part Three Finite Automata Part Three Recap from Last Time A language L is called a regular language if there exists a DFA D such that L( D) = L. NFAs An NFA is a Nondeterministic Finite Automaton Can have missing

More information

Parsing. Handle, viable prefix, items, closures, goto s LR(k): SLR(1), LR(1), LALR(1)

Parsing. Handle, viable prefix, items, closures, goto s LR(k): SLR(1), LR(1), LALR(1) TD parsing - LL(1) Parsing First and Follow sets Parse table construction BU Parsing Handle, viable prefix, items, closures, goto s LR(k): SLR(1), LR(1), LALR(1) Problems with SLR Aho, Sethi, Ullman, Compilers

More information

Chapter 18: Decidability

Chapter 18: Decidability Chapter 18: Decidability Peter Cappello Department of Computer Science University of California, Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA 93106 cappello@cs.ucsb.edu Please read the corresponding chapter before

More information

Downloaded from Page 1. LR Parsing

Downloaded from  Page 1. LR Parsing Downloaded from http://himadri.cmsdu.org Page 1 LR Parsing We first understand Context Free Grammars. Consider the input string: x+2*y When scanned by a scanner, it produces the following stream of tokens:

More information

Strings, Languages, and Regular Expressions

Strings, Languages, and Regular Expressions Strings, Languages, and Regular Expressions Strings An alphabet sets is simply a nonempty set of things. We will call these things symbols. A finite string of lengthnover an alphabets is a total function

More information

Chapter 4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis

Chapter 4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis Chapter 4 Lexical and Syntax Analysis Chapter 4 Topics Introduction Lexical Analysis The Parsing Problem Recursive-Descent Parsing Bottom-Up Parsing Copyright 2012 Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.

More information

CSE431 Translation of Computer Languages

CSE431 Translation of Computer Languages CSE431 Translation of Computer Languages Top Down Parsers Doug Shook Top Down Parsers Two forms: Recursive Descent Table Also known as LL(k) parsers: Read tokens from Left to right Produces a Leftmost

More information

CS143 Handout 14 Summer 2011 July 6 th, LALR Parsing

CS143 Handout 14 Summer 2011 July 6 th, LALR Parsing CS143 Handout 14 Summer 2011 July 6 th, 2011 LALR Parsing Handout written by Maggie Johnson, revised by Julie Zelenski. Motivation Because a canonical LR(1) parser splits states based on differing lookahead

More information

Introduction to Bottom-Up Parsing

Introduction to Bottom-Up Parsing Introduction to Bottom-Up Parsing Lecture 11 CS 536 Spring 2001 1 Outline he strategy: shift-reduce parsing Ambiguity and precedence declarations Next lecture: bottom-up parsing algorithms CS 536 Spring

More information

LR Parsing, Part 2. Constructing Parse Tables. An NFA Recognizing Viable Prefixes. Computing the Closure. GOTO Function and DFA States

LR Parsing, Part 2. Constructing Parse Tables. An NFA Recognizing Viable Prefixes. Computing the Closure. GOTO Function and DFA States TDDD16 Compilers and Interpreters TDDB44 Compiler Construction LR Parsing, Part 2 Constructing Parse Tables Parse table construction Grammar conflict handling Categories of LR Grammars and Parsers An NFA

More information

3. Syntax Analysis. Andrea Polini. Formal Languages and Compilers Master in Computer Science University of Camerino

3. Syntax Analysis. Andrea Polini. Formal Languages and Compilers Master in Computer Science University of Camerino 3. Syntax Analysis Andrea Polini Formal Languages and Compilers Master in Computer Science University of Camerino (Formal Languages and Compilers) 3. Syntax Analysis CS@UNICAM 1 / 54 Syntax Analysis: the

More information

Principles of Programming Languages

Principles of Programming Languages Principles of Programming Languages h"p://www.di.unipi.it/~andrea/dida2ca/plp- 14/ Prof. Andrea Corradini Department of Computer Science, Pisa Lesson 8! Bo;om- Up Parsing Shi?- Reduce LR(0) automata and

More information

Recursive Descent Parsers

Recursive Descent Parsers Recursive Descent Parsers Lecture 7 Robb T. Koether Hampden-Sydney College Wed, Jan 28, 2015 Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Recursive Descent Parsers Wed, Jan 28, 2015 1 / 18 1 Parsing 2 LL Parsers

More information

Architecture of Compilers, Interpreters. CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Front End Scanner and Parser. Implementing the Front End

Architecture of Compilers, Interpreters. CMSC 330: Organization of Programming Languages. Front End Scanner and Parser. Implementing the Front End Architecture of Compilers, Interpreters : Organization of Programming Languages ource Analyzer Optimizer Code Generator Context Free Grammars Intermediate Representation Front End Back End Compiler / Interpreter

More information

University of Technology Department of Computer Sciences. Final Examination st Term. Subject:Compilers Design

University of Technology Department of Computer Sciences. Final Examination st Term. Subject:Compilers Design Subject:Compilers Design Division: All Branches Examiner:Dr. Abeer Tariq University of Technology Department of Computer Sciences 2102 Final Examination 2011-2012 1 st Term Year:Third Time: 3 Hours Date:

More information

Error Recovery. Computer Science 320 Prof. David Walker - 1 -

Error Recovery. Computer Science 320 Prof. David Walker - 1 - Error Recovery Syntax Errors: A Syntax Error occurs when stream of tokens is an invalid string. In LL(k) or LR(k) parsing tables, blank entries refer to syntax erro How should syntax errors be handled?

More information

Section A. A grammar that produces more than one parse tree for some sentences is said to be ambiguous.

Section A. A grammar that produces more than one parse tree for some sentences is said to be ambiguous. Section A 1. What do you meant by parser and its types? A parser for grammar G is a program that takes as input a string w and produces as output either a parse tree for w, if w is a sentence of G, or

More information

Review of CFGs and Parsing II Bottom-up Parsers. Lecture 5. Review slides 1

Review of CFGs and Parsing II Bottom-up Parsers. Lecture 5. Review slides 1 Review of CFGs and Parsing II Bottom-up Parsers Lecture 5 1 Outline Parser Overview op-down Parsers (Covered largely through labs) Bottom-up Parsers 2 he Functionality of the Parser Input: sequence of

More information

CSE 130 Programming Language Principles & Paradigms Lecture # 5. Chapter 4 Lexical and Syntax Analysis

CSE 130 Programming Language Principles & Paradigms Lecture # 5. Chapter 4 Lexical and Syntax Analysis Chapter 4 Lexical and Syntax Analysis Introduction - Language implementation systems must analyze source code, regardless of the specific implementation approach - Nearly all syntax analysis is based on

More information

Notes for Comp 454 Week 2

Notes for Comp 454 Week 2 Notes for Comp 454 Week 2 This week we look at the material in chapters 3 and 4. Homework on Chapters 2, 3 and 4 is assigned (see end of notes). Answers to the homework problems are due by September 10th.

More information

Parsers. Xiaokang Qiu Purdue University. August 31, 2018 ECE 468

Parsers. Xiaokang Qiu Purdue University. August 31, 2018 ECE 468 Parsers Xiaokang Qiu Purdue University ECE 468 August 31, 2018 What is a parser A parser has two jobs: 1) Determine whether a string (program) is valid (think: grammatically correct) 2) Determine the structure

More information

CS143 Handout 20 Summer 2011 July 15 th, 2011 CS143 Practice Midterm and Solution

CS143 Handout 20 Summer 2011 July 15 th, 2011 CS143 Practice Midterm and Solution CS143 Handout 20 Summer 2011 July 15 th, 2011 CS143 Practice Midterm and Solution Exam Facts Format Wednesday, July 20 th from 11:00 a.m. 1:00 p.m. in Gates B01 The exam is designed to take roughly 90

More information

Parsing Wrapup. Roadmap (Where are we?) Last lecture Shift-reduce parser LR(1) parsing. This lecture LR(1) parsing

Parsing Wrapup. Roadmap (Where are we?) Last lecture Shift-reduce parser LR(1) parsing. This lecture LR(1) parsing Parsing Wrapup Roadmap (Where are we?) Last lecture Shift-reduce parser LR(1) parsing LR(1) items Computing closure Computing goto LR(1) canonical collection This lecture LR(1) parsing Building ACTION

More information

Review main idea syntax-directed evaluation and translation. Recall syntax-directed interpretation in recursive descent parsers

Review main idea syntax-directed evaluation and translation. Recall syntax-directed interpretation in recursive descent parsers Plan for Today Review main idea syntax-directed evaluation and translation Recall syntax-directed interpretation in recursive descent parsers Syntax-directed evaluation and translation in shift-reduce

More information

CSE 401 Compilers. LR Parsing Hal Perkins Autumn /10/ Hal Perkins & UW CSE D-1

CSE 401 Compilers. LR Parsing Hal Perkins Autumn /10/ Hal Perkins & UW CSE D-1 CSE 401 Compilers LR Parsing Hal Perkins Autumn 2011 10/10/2011 2002-11 Hal Perkins & UW CSE D-1 Agenda LR Parsing Table-driven Parsers Parser States Shift-Reduce and Reduce-Reduce conflicts 10/10/2011

More information

CSE P 501 Compilers. LR Parsing Hal Perkins Spring UW CSE P 501 Spring 2018 D-1

CSE P 501 Compilers. LR Parsing Hal Perkins Spring UW CSE P 501 Spring 2018 D-1 CSE P 501 Compilers LR Parsing Hal Perkins Spring 2018 UW CSE P 501 Spring 2018 D-1 Agenda LR Parsing Table-driven Parsers Parser States Shift-Reduce and Reduce-Reduce conflicts UW CSE P 501 Spring 2018

More information

Intro to Bottom-up Parsing. Lecture 9

Intro to Bottom-up Parsing. Lecture 9 Intro to Bottom-up Parsing Lecture 9 Bottom-Up Parsing Bottom-up parsing is more general than topdown parsing And just as efficient Builds on ideas in top-down parsing Bottom-up is the preferred method

More information

MIT Parse Table Construction. Martin Rinard Laboratory for Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology

MIT Parse Table Construction. Martin Rinard Laboratory for Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology MIT 6.035 Parse Table Construction Martin Rinard Laboratory for Computer Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Parse Tables (Review) ACTION Goto State ( ) $ X s0 shift to s2 error error goto s1

More information

8 Parsing. Parsing. Top Down Parsing Methods. Parsing complexity. Top down vs. bottom up parsing. Top down vs. bottom up parsing

8 Parsing. Parsing. Top Down Parsing Methods. Parsing complexity. Top down vs. bottom up parsing. Top down vs. bottom up parsing 8 Parsing Parsing A grammar describes syntactically legal strings in a language A recogniser simply accepts or rejects strings A generator produces strings A parser constructs a parse tree for a string

More information

LR Parsing. Leftmost and Rightmost Derivations. Compiler Design CSE 504. Derivations for id + id: T id = id+id. 1 Shift-Reduce Parsing.

LR Parsing. Leftmost and Rightmost Derivations. Compiler Design CSE 504. Derivations for id + id: T id = id+id. 1 Shift-Reduce Parsing. LR Parsing Compiler Design CSE 504 1 Shift-Reduce Parsing 2 LR Parsers 3 SLR and LR(1) Parsers Last modifled: Fri Mar 06 2015 at 13:50:06 EST Version: 1.7 16:58:46 2016/01/29 Compiled at 12:57 on 2016/02/26

More information

CS 314 Principles of Programming Languages. Lecture 3

CS 314 Principles of Programming Languages. Lecture 3 CS 314 Principles of Programming Languages Lecture 3 Zheng Zhang Department of Computer Science Rutgers University Wednesday 14 th September, 2016 Zheng Zhang 1 CS@Rutgers University Class Information

More information

Formal Languages and Compilers Lecture VI: Lexical Analysis

Formal Languages and Compilers Lecture VI: Lexical Analysis Formal Languages and Compilers Lecture VI: Lexical Analysis Free University of Bozen-Bolzano Faculty of Computer Science POS Building, Room: 2.03 artale@inf.unibz.it http://www.inf.unibz.it/ artale/ Formal

More information

Top down vs. bottom up parsing

Top down vs. bottom up parsing Parsing A grammar describes the strings that are syntactically legal A recogniser simply accepts or rejects strings A generator produces sentences in the language described by the grammar A parser constructs

More information

Assignment No.4 solution. Pumping Lemma Version I and II. Where m = n! (n-factorial) and n = 1, 2, 3

Assignment No.4 solution. Pumping Lemma Version I and II. Where m = n! (n-factorial) and n = 1, 2, 3 Assignment No.4 solution Question No.1 a. Suppose we have a language defined below, Pumping Lemma Version I and II a n b m Where m = n! (n-factorial) and n = 1, 2, 3 Some strings belonging to this language

More information

PART 3 - SYNTAX ANALYSIS. F. Wotawa TU Graz) Compiler Construction Summer term / 309

PART 3 - SYNTAX ANALYSIS. F. Wotawa TU Graz) Compiler Construction Summer term / 309 PART 3 - SYNTAX ANALYSIS F. Wotawa (IST @ TU Graz) Compiler Construction Summer term 2016 64 / 309 Goals Definition of the syntax of a programming language using context free grammars Methods for parsing

More information

SLR parsers. LR(0) items

SLR parsers. LR(0) items SLR parsers LR(0) items As we have seen, in order to make shift-reduce parsing practical, we need a reasonable way to identify viable prefixes (and so, possible handles). Up to now, it has not been clear

More information

Lesson 12: Angles Associated with Parallel Lines

Lesson 12: Angles Associated with Parallel Lines Lesson 12 Lesson 12: Angles Associated with Parallel Lines Classwork Exploratory Challenge 1 In the figure below, LL 1 is not parallel to LL 2, and mm is a transversal. Use a protractor to measure angles

More information

Chapter 4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis. Topics. Compilation. Language Implementation. Issues in Lexical and Syntax Analysis.

Chapter 4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis. Topics. Compilation. Language Implementation. Issues in Lexical and Syntax Analysis. Topics Chapter 4 Lexical and Syntax Analysis Introduction Lexical Analysis Syntax Analysis Recursive -Descent Parsing Bottom-Up parsing 2 Language Implementation Compilation There are three possible approaches

More information

LALR Parsing. What Yacc and most compilers employ.

LALR Parsing. What Yacc and most compilers employ. LALR Parsing Canonical sets of LR(1) items Number of states much larger than in the SLR construction LR(1) = Order of thousands for a standard prog. Lang. SLR(1) = order of hundreds for a standard prog.

More information

UNIT-III BOTTOM-UP PARSING

UNIT-III BOTTOM-UP PARSING UNIT-III BOTTOM-UP PARSING Constructing a parse tree for an input string beginning at the leaves and going towards the root is called bottom-up parsing. A general type of bottom-up parser is a shift-reduce

More information

Bottom-Up Parsing. Lecture 11-12

Bottom-Up Parsing. Lecture 11-12 Bottom-Up Parsing Lecture 11-12 (From slides by G. Necula & R. Bodik) 2/20/08 Prof. Hilfinger CS164 Lecture 11 1 Administrivia Test I during class on 10 March. 2/20/08 Prof. Hilfinger CS164 Lecture 11

More information

CS 4120 Introduction to Compilers

CS 4120 Introduction to Compilers CS 4120 Introduction to Compilers Andrew Myers Cornell University Lecture 6: Bottom-Up Parsing 9/9/09 Bottom-up parsing A more powerful parsing technology LR grammars -- more expressive than LL can handle

More information

Wednesday, August 31, Parsers

Wednesday, August 31, Parsers Parsers How do we combine tokens? Combine tokens ( words in a language) to form programs ( sentences in a language) Not all combinations of tokens are correct programs (not all sentences are grammatically

More information

LR Parsing. The first L means the input string is processed from left to right.

LR Parsing. The first L means the input string is processed from left to right. LR Parsing 1 Introduction The LL Parsing that is provided in JFLAP is what is formally referred to as LL(1) parsing. Grammars that can be parsed using this algorithm are called LL grammars and they form

More information

Regular Expressions. Lecture 10 Sections Robb T. Koether. Hampden-Sydney College. Wed, Sep 14, 2016

Regular Expressions. Lecture 10 Sections Robb T. Koether. Hampden-Sydney College. Wed, Sep 14, 2016 Regular Expressions Lecture 10 Sections 3.1-3.2 Robb T. Koether Hampden-Sydney College Wed, Sep 14, 2016 Robb T. Koether (Hampden-Sydney College) Regular Expressions Wed, Sep 14, 2016 1 / 23 Outline 1

More information

CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation. Lecture #28: Regular Expressions and Languages David Mix Barrington 2 April 2014

CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation. Lecture #28: Regular Expressions and Languages David Mix Barrington 2 April 2014 CMPSCI 250: Introduction to Computation Lecture #28: Regular Expressions and Languages David Mix Barrington 2 April 2014 Regular Expressions and Languages Regular Expressions The Formal Inductive Definition

More information

Parser. Larissa von Witte. 11. Januar Institut für Softwaretechnik und Programmiersprachen. L. v. Witte 11. Januar /23

Parser. Larissa von Witte. 11. Januar Institut für Softwaretechnik und Programmiersprachen. L. v. Witte 11. Januar /23 Parser Larissa von Witte Institut für oftwaretechnik und Programmiersprachen 11. Januar 2016 L. v. Witte 11. Januar 2016 1/23 Contents Introduction Taxonomy Recursive Descent Parser hift Reduce Parser

More information

4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis

4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis 4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis 4.1 Introduction Language implementation systems must analyze source code, regardless of the specific implementation approach Nearly all syntax analysis is based on a formal

More information

LR Parsing E T + E T 1 T

LR Parsing E T + E T 1 T LR Parsing 1 Introduction Before reading this quick JFLAP tutorial on parsing please make sure to look at a reference on LL parsing to get an understanding of how the First and Follow sets are defined.

More information

General Overview of Compiler

General Overview of Compiler General Overview of Compiler Compiler: - It is a complex program by which we convert any high level programming language (source code) into machine readable code. Interpreter: - It performs the same task

More information

4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis

4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis 4. Lexical and Syntax Analysis 4.1 Introduction Language implementation systems must analyze source code, regardless of the specific implementation approach Nearly all syntax analysis is based on a formal

More information

Parsing III. CS434 Lecture 8 Spring 2005 Department of Computer Science University of Alabama Joel Jones

Parsing III. CS434 Lecture 8 Spring 2005 Department of Computer Science University of Alabama Joel Jones Parsing III (Top-down parsing: recursive descent & LL(1) ) (Bottom-up parsing) CS434 Lecture 8 Spring 2005 Department of Computer Science University of Alabama Joel Jones Copyright 2003, Keith D. Cooper,

More information

Table-Driven Parsing

Table-Driven Parsing Table-Driven Parsing It is possible to build a non-recursive predictive parser by maintaining a stack explicitly, rather than implicitly via recursive calls [1] The non-recursive parser looks up the production

More information

CS308 Compiler Principles Syntax Analyzer Li Jiang

CS308 Compiler Principles Syntax Analyzer Li Jiang CS308 Syntax Analyzer Li Jiang Department of Computer Science and Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Syntax Analyzer Syntax Analyzer creates the syntactic structure of the given source program.

More information

Bottom-Up Parsing. Lecture 11-12

Bottom-Up Parsing. Lecture 11-12 Bottom-Up Parsing Lecture 11-12 (From slides by G. Necula & R. Bodik) 9/22/06 Prof. Hilfinger CS164 Lecture 11 1 Bottom-Up Parsing Bottom-up parsing is more general than topdown parsing And just as efficient

More information

CS 314 Principles of Programming Languages

CS 314 Principles of Programming Languages CS 314 Principles of Programming Languages Lecture 2: Syntax Analysis Zheng (Eddy) Zhang Rutgers University January 22, 2018 Announcement First recitation starts this Wednesday Homework 1 will be release

More information

CS 403 Compiler Construction Lecture 3 Lexical Analysis [Based on Chapter 1, 2, 3 of Aho2]

CS 403 Compiler Construction Lecture 3 Lexical Analysis [Based on Chapter 1, 2, 3 of Aho2] CS 403 Compiler Construction Lecture 3 Lexical Analysis [Based on Chapter 1, 2, 3 of Aho2] 1 What is Lexical Analysis? First step of a compiler. Reads/scans/identify the characters in the program and groups

More information

Finite Automata Part Three

Finite Automata Part Three Finite Automata Part Three Recap from Last Time A language L is called a regular language if there exists a DFA D such that L( D) = L. NFAs An NFA is a Nondeterministic Finite Automaton Can have missing

More information

Syntax-Directed Translation. Lecture 14

Syntax-Directed Translation. Lecture 14 Syntax-Directed Translation Lecture 14 (adapted from slides by R. Bodik) 9/27/2006 Prof. Hilfinger, Lecture 14 1 Motivation: parser as a translator syntax-directed translation stream of tokens parser ASTs,

More information

Wednesday, September 9, 15. Parsers

Wednesday, September 9, 15. Parsers Parsers What is a parser A parser has two jobs: 1) Determine whether a string (program) is valid (think: grammatically correct) 2) Determine the structure of a program (think: diagramming a sentence) Agenda

More information

Parsers. What is a parser. Languages. Agenda. Terminology. Languages. A parser has two jobs:

Parsers. What is a parser. Languages. Agenda. Terminology. Languages. A parser has two jobs: What is a parser Parsers A parser has two jobs: 1) Determine whether a string (program) is valid (think: grammatically correct) 2) Determine the structure of a program (think: diagramming a sentence) Agenda

More information

CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing

CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing CS375: Logic and Theory of Computing Fuhua (Frank) Cheng Department of Computer Science University of Kentucky 1 Table of Contents: Week 1: Preliminaries (set algebra, relations, functions) (read Chapters

More information

LL Parsing: A piece of cake after LR

LL Parsing: A piece of cake after LR LL Parsing: A piece of cake after LR Lecture 11 Dr. Sean Peisert ECS 142 Spring 2009 1 LL Parsing Still specified using a CFG Still reads left-to-right (Lx) Now is leftmost derivation (xl) rather than

More information

Outline CS412/413. Administrivia. Review. Grammars. Left vs. Right Recursion. More tips forll(1) grammars Bottom-up parsing LR(0) parser construction

Outline CS412/413. Administrivia. Review. Grammars. Left vs. Right Recursion. More tips forll(1) grammars Bottom-up parsing LR(0) parser construction C12/1 Introduction to Compilers and Translators pring 00 Outline More tips forll1) grammars Bottom-up parsing LR0) parser construction Lecture 5: Bottom-up parsing Lecture 5 C 12/1 pring '00 Andrew Myers

More information

PDA s. and Formal Languages. Automata Theory CS 573. Outline of equivalence of PDA s and CFG s. (see Theorem 5.3)

PDA s. and Formal Languages. Automata Theory CS 573. Outline of equivalence of PDA s and CFG s. (see Theorem 5.3) CS 573 Automata Theory and Formal Languages Professor Leslie Lander Lecture # 20 November 13, 2000 Greibach Normal Form (GNF) Sheila Greibach s normal form (GNF) for a CFG is one where EVERY production

More information

Derivations vs Parses. Example. Parse Tree. Ambiguity. Different Parse Trees. Context Free Grammars 9/18/2012

Derivations vs Parses. Example. Parse Tree. Ambiguity. Different Parse Trees. Context Free Grammars 9/18/2012 Derivations vs Parses Grammar is used to derive string or construct parser Context ree Grammars A derivation is a sequence of applications of rules Starting from the start symbol S......... (sentence)

More information

Formal Languages. Grammar. Ryan Stansifer. Department of Computer Sciences Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida USA 32901

Formal Languages. Grammar. Ryan Stansifer. Department of Computer Sciences Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida USA 32901 Formal Languages Grammar Ryan Stansifer Department of Computer Sciences Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida USA 32901 http://www.cs.fit.edu/~ryan/ March 15, 2018 A formal language is a set

More information

Let us construct the LR(1) items for the grammar given below to construct the LALR parsing table.

Let us construct the LR(1) items for the grammar given below to construct the LALR parsing table. MODULE 18 LALR parsing After understanding the most powerful CALR parser, in this module we will learn to construct the LALR parser. The CALR parser has a large set of items and hence the LALR parser is

More information

Lexical and Syntax Analysis. Bottom-Up Parsing

Lexical and Syntax Analysis. Bottom-Up Parsing Lexical and Syntax Analysis Bottom-Up Parsing Parsing There are two ways to construct derivation of a grammar. Top-Down: begin with start symbol; repeatedly replace an instance of a production s LHS with

More information

LL(1) predictive parsing

LL(1) predictive parsing LL(1) predictive parsing Informatics 2A: Lecture 11 John Longley School of Informatics University of Edinburgh jrl@staffmail.ed.ac.uk 13 October, 2011 1 / 12 1 LL(1) grammars and parse tables 2 3 2 / 12

More information

Parsing - 1. What is parsing? Shift-reduce parsing. Operator precedence parsing. Shift-reduce conflict Reduce-reduce conflict

Parsing - 1. What is parsing? Shift-reduce parsing. Operator precedence parsing. Shift-reduce conflict Reduce-reduce conflict Parsing - 1 What is parsing? Shift-reduce parsing Shift-reduce conflict Reduce-reduce conflict Operator precedence parsing Parsing-1 BGRyder Spring 99 1 Parsing Parsing is the reverse of doing a derivation

More information

Bottom Up Parsing. Shift and Reduce. Sentential Form. Handle. Parse Tree. Bottom Up Parsing 9/26/2012. Also known as Shift-Reduce parsing

Bottom Up Parsing. Shift and Reduce. Sentential Form. Handle. Parse Tree. Bottom Up Parsing 9/26/2012. Also known as Shift-Reduce parsing Also known as Shift-Reduce parsing More powerful than top down Don t need left factored grammars Can handle left recursion Attempt to construct parse tree from an input string eginning at leaves and working

More information

Outline. The strategy: shift-reduce parsing. Introduction to Bottom-Up Parsing. A key concept: handles

Outline. The strategy: shift-reduce parsing. Introduction to Bottom-Up Parsing. A key concept: handles Outline Introduction to Bottom-Up Parsing Lecture Notes by Profs. Alex Aiken and George Necula (UCB) he strategy: -reduce parsing A key concept: handles Ambiguity and precedence declarations CS780(Prasad)

More information

Plan for Today. Regular Expressions: repetition and choice. Syntax and Semantics. Context Free Grammars

Plan for Today. Regular Expressions: repetition and choice. Syntax and Semantics. Context Free Grammars Plan for Today Context Free s models for specifying programming languages syntax semantics example grammars derivations Parse trees yntax-directed translation Used syntax-directed translation to interpret

More information

Lec-5-HW-1, TM basics

Lec-5-HW-1, TM basics Lec-5-HW-1, TM basics (Problem 0)-------------------- Design a Turing Machine (TM), T_sub, that does unary decrement by one. Assume a legal, initial tape consists of a contiguous set of cells, each containing

More information

Models of Computation II: Grammars and Pushdown Automata

Models of Computation II: Grammars and Pushdown Automata Models of Computation II: Grammars and Pushdown Automata COMP1600 / COMP6260 Dirk Pattinson Australian National University Semester 2, 2018 Catch Up / Drop in Lab Session 1 Monday 1100-1200 at Room 2.41

More information

Top-Down Parsing and Intro to Bottom-Up Parsing. Lecture 7

Top-Down Parsing and Intro to Bottom-Up Parsing. Lecture 7 Top-Down Parsing and Intro to Bottom-Up Parsing Lecture 7 1 Predictive Parsers Like recursive-descent but parser can predict which production to use Predictive parsers are never wrong Always able to guess

More information

Top-Down Parsing and Intro to Bottom-Up Parsing. Lecture 7

Top-Down Parsing and Intro to Bottom-Up Parsing. Lecture 7 Top-Down Parsing and Intro to Bottom-Up Parsing Lecture 7 1 Predictive Parsers Like recursive-descent but parser can predict which production to use Predictive parsers are never wrong Always able to guess

More information

Introduction to Parsing. Lecture 8

Introduction to Parsing. Lecture 8 Introduction to Parsing Lecture 8 Adapted from slides by G. Necula Outline Limitations of regular languages Parser overview Context-free grammars (CFG s) Derivations Languages and Automata Formal languages

More information

CS311 / MATH352 - AUTOMATA AND COMPLEXITY THEORY

CS311 / MATH352 - AUTOMATA AND COMPLEXITY THEORY CS311 / MATH352 - AUTOMATA AND COMPLEXITY THEORY Homework # 8 Max. Points: 100 Due Date: Thursday, February 15, 2007, 11:45 AM Student s Name: Student ID: Important Instructions You are required to get

More information