Security System and COntrol 1
|
|
|
- Jody Reed
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Security System and COntrol 1
2 Security Management By: Joseph Ronald Canedo
3 It is a Risky World
4 Vulnerabilities Security objectives: Prevent attacks Detect attacks Recover from attacks Attacks: against weaknesses in the information systems Need: find weaknesses Control 4
5 Identifying and Eliminating Weaknesses I. Vulnerability monitoring II. III. IV. Secure system development User training and awareness Avoiding single point of failure Control 5
6 I. Vulnerability Monitoring Identify potential weaknesses in existing information systems Reveal wide-range of vulnerabilities Control 6
7 I. Security Flaws Secure software installation Correct installation of software Change default settings Validate upgrades/changes Patch new security flaws Control 7
8 I. Vulnerability Detection Tools Computer Oracle and Password System (COPS) FREE Checks vulnerabilities of UNIX systems Secure Analysis Tool for Auditing Networks (SATAN) FREE SAFEsuite (Internet Security Systems, Inc.) Family of network security assessment tools (web security scanner, firewall scanner, intranet scanner, system security scanner) Keyed to the IP address of the customer Control 8
9 I. Keeping up with Security Publications Legal publications: how to remove vulnerabilities CERT advisories SANS Security Digest Hacker publications: how to exploit known vulnerabilities Security mailing lists Control 9
10 II. Building Secure Systems 1960s: US Department of Defense (DoD) risk of unsecured information systems 1981: National Computer Security Center (NCSC) at the NSA DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria (TCSEC) == Orange Book Control 10
11 II. Orange Book Orange Book objectives: Guidance of what security features to build into new products Provide measurement to evaluate security of systems Basis for specifying security requirements Security features and Assurances Trusted Computing Base (TCB) security components of the system Control 11
12 II. Orange Book Levels Highest Security A1 Verified protection B3 Security Domains B2 Structured Protection B1 labeled Security Protections C2 Controlled Access Protection C1 Discretionary Security Protection D Minimal Protection No Security Control 12
13 II. Security Policy C1 C2 B1 B2 B3 A1 DAC + + nc nc + nc Object Reuse 0 + nc nc nc nc Labels nc nc Label integrity nc nc nc Exploration of labeled info nc nc nc Labeling human-readable output nc nc nc MAC nc nc Subject sensitive labels nc nc Device Labels nc nc 0 no requirements MAC + added requirement (from lecture notes of Jajodia nc no change Control 13
14 II. Accountability C1 C2 B1 B2 B3 A1 Identification and Authentication nc nc nc Audit nc Trusted Path nc 0 no requirements + added requirement nc no change Assurance changes (from lecture notes of Jajodia Control 14
15 II. Assurance C1 C2 B1 B2 B3 A1 System Architecture nc System Integrity + nc nc nc nc nc Security Testing Design Specification and Verification Covert Channel Analysis Trusted Facility Management nc Configuration Management nc + Trusted Recovery nc Trusted Distribution no requirements No covert channel + added requirement (from lecture notes of Jajodia nc no change Control 15
16 II. Documentation C1 C2 B1 B2 B3 A1 Security Features User s Guide + nc nc nc nc nc Trusted Facility Manual nc Test Documentation + nc nc + nc + Design Documentation + nc no requirements + added requirement nc no change (from lecture notes of Jajodia Control 16
17 II. Covert Channel Analysis B1: no requirements B2: covert storage channels B3: covert channels (timing and storage channels) A1: formal methods (proof of covert channel analysis) (from lecture notes of Jajodia Control 17
18 II. Design Specifications and Verification C2: no requirement B1: informal or formal model of the security policy B2: formal model of the security policy that is proven consistent with its axioms, DTLS (descriptive top-level specification) of the TCB) B3: convincing argument shall be given that the DTLS is consistent with the model A1: FTLS (formal top-level specification) of the TCB Formal and informal techniques to show that FTLS is consistent with the model Convincing argument the DTLS is consistent with the model (from lecture notes of Jajodia Control 18
19 II. Orange Book Classes C1, C2: simple enhancement of existing systems. Does not break applications. B1: relatively simple enhancement of existing system. May break some of the applications. B2: major enhancement of existing systems. Will break many applications. B3: failed A1 A1: top-down design and implementation of a new system from scratch. (from lecture notes of Jajodia Control 19
20 II. Orange Book Criticisms Mixes various levels of abstraction in a single document Does not address integrity of data Combines functionality and assurance in a single linear rating scale (from lecture notes of Jajodia Control 20
21 II. Functionality vs Assurance functionality is multidimensional assurance has a linear progression functionality C2 B1 B2 B3 A1 C1 assurance (from lecture notes of Jajodia Control 21
22 II. NCSC Rainbow Series Orange: Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria Yellow: Guidance for applying the Orange Book Red: Trusted Network Interpretation Lavender: Trusted Database Interpretation (from lecture notes of Jajodia Control 22
23 II. European Criteria German Information Security Agency: German Green Book (1988) British Department of Trade and Industry and Ministry of Defense: several volumes of criteria Canada, Australia, France: works on evaluation criteria 1991: Information Technology Security Evaluation Criteria (ITSEC) For European community Decoupled features from assurance Introduced new functionality requirement classes Accommodated commercial security requirements Control 23
24 II. United State January 1996: Common Criteria Joint work with Canada and Europe Separates functionality from assurance Nine classes of functionality: audit, communications, user data protection, identification and authentication, privacy, protection of trusted functions, resource utilization, establishing user sessions, and trusted path. Seven classes of assurance: configuration management, delivery and operation, development, guidance documents, life cycle support, tests, and vulnerability assessment. Control 24
25 II. Common Criteria Evaluation Assurance Levels (EAL) EAL1: functionally tested EAL2: structurally tested EAL3: methodologically tested and checked EAL4: methodologically designed, tested and reviewed EAL5: semi-formally designed and tested EAL6: semi-formally verified and tested EAL7: formally verified design and tested Control 25
26 II. National Information Assurance Partnership (NIAP) 1997: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), National Security Agency (NSA), and Industry Aims to improve the efficiency of evaluation Transfer methodologies and techniques to private sector laboratories Functions: developing tests, test methods, tools for evaluating and improving security products, developing protection profiles and associated tests, establish formal and international schema for CC. Control 26
27 III. Security Awareness and Training Major weakness: users unawareness Organizational effort Educational effort Customer training Federal Trade Commission: program to educate customers about web scams Control 27
28 IV. Avoid Single Point of Failure Critical information resources Identification Backup Hiding Separation of duties Multi-person requirements Limit temptations Control 28
29 Security System and COntrol 29
CYSE 411/AIT 681 Secure Software Engineering Topic #3. Risk Management
CYSE 411/AIT 681 Secure Software Engineering Topic #3. Risk Management Instructor: Dr. Kun Sun Outline 1. Risk management 2. Standards on Evaluating Secure System 3. Security Analysis using Security Metrics
Chapter 18: Evaluating Systems
Chapter 18: Evaluating Systems Goals Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria FIPS 140 Common Criteria SSE-CMM Slide #18-1 Overview Goals Why evaluate? Evaluation criteria TCSEC (aka Orange Book) FIPS
Introduce the major evaluation criteria. TCSEC (Orange book) ITSEC Common Criteria
Introduce the major evaluation criteria. TCSEC (Orange book) ITSEC Common Criteria Evaluation: assessing whether a product has the security properties claimed for it. Certification: assessing whether a
CCM 4350 Week 22. Security Architecture and Engineering. Dr A. Lasebae School of Science and Technology CCM4350 1
CCM 4350 Week 22 Security Architecture and Engineering Dr A. Lasebae School of Science and Technology CCM4350 1 Security Evaluation CCM4350 2 Security Evaluation How do you get assurance that your computer
Introduce the major evaluation criteria. TCSEC (Orange book) ITSEC Common Criteria
Introduce the major evaluation criteria. TCSEC (Orange book) ITSEC Common Criteria Evaluation: assessing whether a product has the security properties claimed for it. Certification: assessing whether a
IT Security Evaluation : Common Criteria
AfriNIC-9 MEETING Mauritius 22-28 November 2008 IT Security Evaluation : Common Criteria Ministry of Communication Technologies National Digital Certification Agency Mounir Ferjani November 2008 afrinic
UNICOS/mp Common Criteria Evaluation
UNICOS/mp Common Criteria Evaluation Janet Lebens, Cray Inc. Cray Proprietary Agenda Definitions NIAP CCEVS Common Criteria CC vs TCSEC Why Evaluate? Steps of Evaluation Details of Steps for Cray / Progress
Computer Security CS 426 Lecture 17
Computer Security CS 426 Lecture 17 Trusted Computing Base. Orange Book, Common Criteria Elisa Bertino Purdue University IN, USA bertino@cs.purdue.edu 1 Trusted vs. Trustworthy A component of a system
Building an Assurance Foundation for 21 st Century Information Systems and Networks
Building an Assurance Foundation for 21 st Century Information Systems and Networks The Role of IT Security Standards, Metrics, and Assessment Programs Dr. Ron Ross National Information Assurance Partnership
Trusted OS Design CS461/ECE422
Trusted OS Design CS461/ECE422 1 Reading Material Section 5.4 of Security in Computing 2 Design Principles Security Features Kernelized Design Virtualization Overview 3 Design Principles Simplicity Less
Session objectives. Security Evaluation. Evaluation Standards. Can we trust a secure product/system? CSM27 Computer Security
Overview Session objectives Security Evaluation CSM27 Computer Security Dr Hans Georg Schaathun University of Surrey Discuss advantages and limitations of security evaluations Clarify fundamental concepts
Common Criteria. Introduction Emilie Barse Magnus Ahlbin
Common Criteria Introduction 2015-02-23 Emilie Barse Magnus Ahlbin 1 Magnus Ahlbin Head of EC/ITSEF Information and Security Combitech AB SE-351 80 Växjö Sweden magnus.ahlbin@combitech.se www.combitech.se
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report Blue Ridge Networks BorderGuard Centrally Managed Embedded PKI Virtual Private Network (VPN)
Unit OS7: Security The Security Problem. Windows Operating System Internals - by David A. Solomon and Mark E. Russinovich with Andreas Polze
Unit OS7: Security 7.1. The Security Problem Windows Operating System Internals - by David A. Solomon and Mark E. Russinovich with Andreas Polze 2 Copyright Notice 2000-2005 David A. Solomon and Mark Russinovich
Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation - Update report
Common Criteria for IT Security Evaluation - Update report 4 Developments in harmonisation of evaluation criteria Author. Dr. Ir. Paul L. Overbeek TNO Physics and Electronics Laboratory - p/a P.0.-Box
An Introduction to the ISO Security Standards
An Introduction to the ISO Security Standards Agenda Security vs Privacy Who or What is the ISO? ISO 27001:2013 ISO 27001/27002 domains Building Blocks of Security AVAILABILITY INTEGRITY CONFIDENTIALITY
Applied IT Security. Device Security. Dr. Stephan Spitz 10 Development Security. Applied IT Security, Dr.
Applied IT Security Device Security Dr. Stephan Spitz Stephan.Spitz@gi-de.com Overview & Basics System Security Network Protocols and the Internet Operating Systems and Applications Operating System Security
National Information Assurance Partnership. Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report Xerox Corporation Xerox CopyCentre C2128/C2636/C3545 Copier and WorkCentre Pro C2128/C2636/C3545
Defining IT Security Requirements for Federal Systems and Networks
Defining IT Security Requirements for Federal Systems and Networks Employing Common Criteria Profiles in Key Technology Areas Dr. Ron Ross 1 The Fundamentals Building more secure systems depends on the
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme NetScreen Technologies, Incorporated Report Number: CCEVS-VR-02-0027 Version 1.0 Dated: 30 November 2002 National
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report Delta Security Technologies Sentinel Model III Computer Security System Report Number: CCEVS-VR-02-0023
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report IEEE IEEE 2600.1-2009 Report Number: CCEVS-VR-10340 Dated: 2009-06-09 Version: 2.0 National
FISMAand the Risk Management Framework
FISMAand the Risk Management Framework The New Practice of Federal Cyber Security Stephen D. Gantz Daniel R. Phi I pott Darren Windham, Technical Editor ^jm* ELSEVIER AMSTERDAM BOSTON HEIDELBERG LONDON
TEL2813/IS2820 Security Management
TEL2813/IS2820 Security Management Security Management Models And Practices Lecture 6 Jan 27, 2005 Introduction To create or maintain a secure environment 1. Design working security plan 2. Implement management
Last time. Security Policies and Models. Trusted Operating System Design. Bell La-Padula and Biba Security Models Information Flow Control
Last time Security Policies and Models Bell La-Padula and Biba Security Models Information Flow Control Trusted Operating System Design Design Elements Security Features 10-1 This time Trusted Operating
Operating systems and security - Overview
Operating systems and security - Overview Protection in Operating systems Protected objects Protecting memory, files User authentication, especially passwords Trusted operating systems, security kernels,
Operating systems and security - Overview
Operating systems and security - Overview Protection in Operating systems Protected objects Protecting memory, files User authentication, especially passwords Trusted operating systems, security kernels,
Common Criteria (CC) Introduction
Common Criteria (CC) Introduction Yanet Manzano Florida State University Outline CC History CC Informally Defined CC Goals Interested Parties Interested Parties: Details CC Part 1 CC Part 2 Functional
Operating System Security, Continued CS 136 Computer Security Peter Reiher January 29, 2008
Operating System Security, Continued CS 136 Computer Security Peter Reiher January 29, 2008 Page 1 Outline Designing secure operating systems Assuring OS security TPM and trusted computing Page 2 Desired
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 2+ Evaluation of Data ONTAP Version 7.2.5.1 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
Use of Formal Methods in Assessment of IA Properties
Use of Formal Methods in Assessment of IA Properties George W. Dinolt gwdinolt@nps.navy.mil 44 th Meeting of IFIP Working Group 10.4 Computer Science Department Naval Postgraduate School 833 Dyer Road
Hacking Terminology. Mark R. Adams, CISSP KPMG LLP
Hacking Terminology Mark R. Adams, CISSP KPMG LLP Backdoor Also referred to as a trap door. A hole in the security of a system deliberately left in place by designers or maintainers. Hackers may also leave
NIST Security Certification and Accreditation Project
NIST Security Certification and Accreditation Project An Integrated Strategy Supporting FISMA Dr. Ron Ross Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory 1 Today s Climate Highly interactive
T Salausjärjestelmät (Cryptosystems) Introduction to the second part of the course. Outline. What we'll cover. Requirements and design issues
T-110.470 Salausjärjestelmät (Cryptosystems) Requirements and design issues Introduction to the second part of the course 25.10.2004 1 3 Outline What we'll cover Introduction to the second part of the
Seagate Supply Chain Standards and Operational Systems
DATA IS POTENTIAL Seagate Supply Chain Standards and Operational Systems Government Solutions Henry Newman May 9 2018 Supply Chain Standards and Results Agenda 1. 2. SUPPLY CHAIN REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARDS
CSIRT in general CSIRT Service Categories Reactive Services Proactive services Security Quality Management Services CSIRT. Brmlab, hackerspace Prague
Brmlab, hackerspace Prague Lightning talks, November 2016 in general in general WTF is an? in general WTF is an? Computer Security in general WTF is an? Computer Security Incident Response in general WTF
Automating the Top 20 CIS Critical Security Controls
20 Automating the Top 20 CIS Critical Security Controls SUMMARY It s not easy being today s CISO or CIO. With the advent of cloud computing, Shadow IT, and mobility, the risk surface area for enterprises
Monthly Cyber Threat Briefing
Monthly Cyber Threat Briefing January 2016 1 Presenters David Link, PM Risk and Vulnerability Assessments, NCATS Ed Cabrera: VP Cybersecurity Strategy, Trend Micro Jason Trost: VP Threat Research, ThreatStream
Certification Report
Certification Report Owl DualDiode Communication Cards v7 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme Government of
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report Microsoft Corporation Windows 2000 Report Number: CCEVS-VR-02-0025 Dated: 25 October 2002
Common Criteria CC-101 Introduction
Common Criteria CC-101 Introduction Yanet Manzano Florida State University manzano@cs.fsu.edu 1 Outline CC History Informally Defined Official Definition Goals Parts Important Definitions Interest Parties
Ransomware. How to protect yourself?
Ransomware How to protect yourself? ED DUGUID, CISSP, VCP CONSULTANT, WEST CHESTER CONSULTANTS Ransomware Ransomware is a type of malware that restricts access to the infected computer system in some way,
Courses. X E - Verify that system acquisitions policies and procedures include assessment of risk management policies X X
4016 Points * = Can include a summary justification for that section. FUNCTION 1 - INFORMATION SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE ACTIVITIES Life Cycle Duties No Subsection 2. System Disposition/Reutilization *E - Discuss
Protecting Buildings Operational Technology (OT) from Evolving Cyber Threats & Vulnerabilities
Cybersecurity Basics For Energy Managers Protecting Buildings Operational Technology (OT) from Evolving Cyber Threats & Vulnerabilities Michael Mylrea Manager, Cybersecurity & Energy Technology Pacific
CS 161 Multilevel & Database Security. Military models of security
CS 161 Multilevel & Database Security 3 October 26 CS 161 3 October 26 Military models of security Need to know Three models of security Classification unclassified, classified, secret, top secret Compartmentalization
Formal Methods and their role in Software and System Development. Riccardo Sisto, Politecnico di Torino
Formal Methods and their role in Software and System Development Riccardo Sisto, Politecnico di Torino What are Formal Methods? Rigorous (mathematical) methods for modelling and analysing (computer-based)
CIT 380: Securing Computer Systems. Software Security
CIT 380: Securing Computer Systems Software Security Topics 1. The problem of software security 2. System security standards 3. Secure lifecycle 4. Buffer overflows 5. Integer overflows 6. Format string
Information Security Policy
April 2016 Table of Contents PURPOSE AND SCOPE 5 I. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 5 II. SCOPE 6 ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION SECURITY 6 I. RESPONSIBILITY FOR INFORMATION SECURITY 6 II. COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING
Designing and Building a Cybersecurity Program
Designing and Building a Cybersecurity Program Based on the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) Larry Wilson lwilson@umassp.edu ISACA Breakfast Meeting January, 2016 Designing & Building a Cybersecurity
EXCERPT. NIST Special Publication R1. Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations
EXCERPT NIST Special Publication 800-171 R1 Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations An Excerpt Listing All: Security Requirement Families & Controls Security
COMMON CRITERIA CERTIFICATION REPORT
COMMON CRITERIA CERTIFICATION REPORT WorkCentre 7845/7845i/7855/7855i 2016 Xerox ConnectKey Technology 12 August 2016 v1.0 383-4-382 Government of Canada. This document is the property of the Government
Security Management Models And Practices Feb 5, 2008
TEL2813/IS2820 Security Management Security Management Models And Practices Feb 5, 2008 Objectives Overview basic standards and best practices Overview of ISO 17799 Overview of NIST SP documents related
DATABASE SECURITY REQUIREMENTS GUIDE (SRG) TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW. Version 2, Release October Developed by DISA for the DoD
DATABASE SECURITY REQUIREMENTS GUIDE (SRG) TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW Version 2, Release 5 28 October 2016 Developed by for the DoD 28 October 2016 Developed by for the DoD Trademark Information Names, products,
MarkLogic Server Enterprise Edition Version 4.0
National Information Assurance Partnership Ø TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report MarkLogic Server Enterprise Edition Version 4.0 Report Number: CCEVS-VR-VID10306-2010
Brocade MLXe Family Devices with Multi- Service IronWare R
National Information Assurance Partnership Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme TM Validation Report Brocade Communication Systems, Inc 130 Holger Way San Jose, CA 95134 Brocade MLXe Family
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: SYSTEM AND NETWORK PENETRATION TESTING. Presented by: John O. Adeika Student ID:
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT: SYSTEM AND NETWORK PENETRATION TESTING. Presented by: John O. Adeika Student ID: 000205600 What is Penetration A penetration test, is a method of evaluating the security of a
Certification Report
Certification Report HP 3PAR StoreServ Storage Systems Version 3.2.1 MU3 Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme
Mapping of FedRAMP Tailored LI SaaS Baseline to ISO Security Controls
Mapping of FedRAMP Tailored LI SaaS Baseline to ISO 27001 Security Controls This document provides a list of all controls that require the Cloud Service Provider, Esri, to provide detailed descriptions
EUROPEAN COMPUTER MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION STANDARD ECMA Commercially oriented functionality class for security evaluation (COFC)
EUROPEAN COMPUTER MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION STANDARD ECMA - 205 Commercially oriented functionality class for security evaluation (COFC) December 1993 Free copies of this document are available from ECMA,
ISO/IEC INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Information technology Security techniques Code of practice for information security management
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 17799 Second edition 2005-06-15 Information technology Security techniques Code of practice for information security management Technologies de l'information Techniques de
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report Innovation Data Processing FDRERASE Version 5.4, Level 50 Report Number: CCEVS-VR-05-0109
Cloud Computing. Faculty of Information Systems. Duc.NHM. nhmduc.wordpress.com
Cloud Computing Faculty of Information Systems Duc.NHM nhmduc.wordpress.com Evaluating Cloud Security: An Information Security Framework Chapter 6 Cloud Computing Duc.NHM 2 1 Evaluating Cloud Security
IASM Support for FISMA
Introduction Most U.S. civilian government agencies, and commercial enterprises processing electronic data on behalf of those agencies, are concerned about whether and how Information Assurance products
Wireless e-business Security. Lothar Vigelandzoon
Wireless e-business Security Lothar Vigelandzoon E-business evolution Increased business drivers for cost efficiency & market penetration Increased Importance of brand reputation Distance between IT and
Certification Report
Certification Report EMC VNX OE for Block v05.33 and File v8.1 with Unisphere v1.3 running on VNX Series Hardware Models VNX5200, VNX5400, VNX5600, VNX5800, VNX7600, and VNX8000 Issued by: Communications
BSI-CC-PP-0088-V for
BSI-CC-PP-0088-V2-2017 for Base Protection Profile for Database Management Systems (DBMS PP) Version 2.12 and DBMS PP Extended Package - Access History (DBMS PP_EP_AH) Version 1.02 developed by DBMS Working
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report U. S. Government Protection Profile Database Management System for Basic Robustness Environments,
National Information Assurance Partnership
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report For VMware ESX Server 2.5.0 and VirtualCenter 1.2.0 Report Number: CCEVS-VR-06-0013 Dated:
Sneak Peak at CIS Critical Security Controls V 7 Release Date: March Presented by Kelli Tarala Principal Consultant Enclave Security
Sneak Peak at CIS Critical Security Controls V 7 Release Date: March 2018 2017 Presented by Kelli Tarala Principal Consultant Enclave Security 2 Standards and Frameworks 3 Information Assurance Frameworks
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report TM QRadar V5.1.2 Report Number: Dated: January 26, 2007 Version: 1.1 National Institute of
Cyber security tips and self-assessment for business
Cyber security tips and self-assessment for business Last year one in five New Zealand SMEs experienced a cyber-attack, so it s essential to be prepared. Our friends at Deloitte have put together this
Common Criteria Certificate
National Information Assurance Partnership Common Criteria Certificate is awarded to Xerox Corporation for ColorQube 8700/8900 Xerox ConnectKey Controller The IT product identified in this certificate
INFORMATION ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE
National Security Agency/Central Security Service INFORMATION ASSURANCE DIRECTORATE CGS Signature Repository A Signature Repository provides a group of signatures for use by network security tools such
1. Post for 45-day comment period and pre-ballot review. 7/26/ Conduct initial ballot. 8/30/2010
Standard CIP 011 1 Cyber Security Protection Standard Development Roadmap This section is maintained by the drafting team during the development of the standard and will be removed when the standard becomes
Enterprise Cybersecurity Best Practices Part Number MAN Revision 006
Enterprise Cybersecurity Best Practices Part Number MAN-00363 Revision 006 April 2013 Hologic and the Hologic Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Hologic, Inc. Microsoft, Active Directory,
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme TM Validation Report Extended Package for Secure Shell, Version 1.0, February 19, 2016 Report Number: CCEVS-VR-PP-0039
COMMON CRITERIA CERTIFICATION REPORT
COMMON CRITERIA CERTIFICATION REPORT WorkCentre 7525/7530/7535/7545/7556 with FIPS 140-2 Compliance over SNMPv3 25 July 2016 v1.0 383-4-371 Government of Canada. This document is the property of the Government
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Security www.redhat.com A Powerful Collection of Red Hat Enterprise Linux Security Tools Computing security has never been more important. Increasing regulations, differing requirements
Brocade MLXe and NetIron Family Devices with Multi-Service IronWare R
National Information Assurance Partnership Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Brocade MLXe and NetIron Family Devices with Multi-Service
Certification Report
Certification Report Standard Edition v2.8.2 RELEASE Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian Common Criteria Evaluation and Certification Scheme Government of
This is to certify that. Chris FitzGerald. has completed the course. Systems Security Engineering _eng 2/10/08
This is to certify that Chris FitzGerald has completed the course Systems Security Engineering - 206760_eng on 2/10/08 Systems Security Engineering About This Course Overview/Description To define the
Certification Report
Certification Report EAL 2+ Evaluation of Tactical Network-layer Gateway (2E2 IA): a GD Canada MESHnet G2 Gateway product Issued by: Communications Security Establishment Canada Certification Body Canadian
Information Systems and Tech (IST)
Information Systems and Tech (IST) 1 Information Systems and Tech (IST) Courses IST 101. Introduction to Information Technology. 4 Introduction to information technology concepts and skills. Survey of
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework U.S. German Standards Panel 2018 April 10, 2018 Adam.Sedgewick@nist.gov National Institute of Standards and Technology About NIST Agency of U.S. Department of Commerce
MIS Week 9 Host Hardening
MIS 5214 Week 9 Host Hardening Agenda NIST Risk Management Framework A quick review Implementing controls Host hardening Security configuration checklist (w/disa STIG Viewer) NIST 800-53Ar4 How Controls
Hacker Academy Ltd COURSES CATALOGUE. Hacker Academy Ltd. LONDON UK
Hacker Academy Ltd COURSES CATALOGUE Hacker Academy Ltd. LONDON UK TABLE OF CONTENTS Basic Level Courses... 3 1. Information Security Awareness for End Users... 3 2. Information Security Awareness for
National Information Assurance Partnership. Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme. Validation Report
National Information Assurance Partnership Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report Network Device Protection Profile (NDPP) Extended Package SIP Server, Version 1.1, November
Cybersecurity & Privacy Enhancements
Business, Industry and Government Cybersecurity & Privacy Enhancements John Lainhart, Director, Grant Thornton The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is in the process of updating their
Who Goes There? Access Control in Water/Wastewater Siemens AG All Rights Reserved. siemens.com/ruggedcom
WEAT Webinar Who Goes There? Access Control in Water/Wastewater Siemens AG 2018. siemens.com/ruggedcom ACCESS CONTROL WEBINAR TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC Why Access Control? Risks If Not Used Factors of Authentication
Cyber Hygiene: A Baseline Set of Practices
[DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A] Approved for public Cyber Hygiene: A Baseline Set of Practices Matt Trevors Charles M. Wallen Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Copyright
ISO/IEC Information technology Security techniques Code of practice for information security management
This is a preview - click here to buy the full publication INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 17799 Second edition 2005-06-15 Information technology Security techniques Code of practice for information security
Controlled Document Page 1 of 6. Effective Date: 6/19/13. Approved by: CAB/F. Approved on: 6/19/13. Version Supersedes:
Page 1 of 6 I. Common Principles and Approaches to Privacy A. A Modern History of Privacy a. Descriptions, definitions and classes b. Historical and social origins B. Types of Information a. Personal information
Brocade FastIron SX, ICX, and FCX Series Switch/Router
National Information Assurance Partnership Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme TM Validation Report Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. 130 Holger Way San Jose, CA 95134 Brocade FastIron
Juniper Vendor Security Requirements
Juniper Vendor Security Requirements INTRODUCTION This document describes measures and processes that the Vendor shall, at a minimum, implement and maintain in order to protect Juniper Data against risks
Module 6: Network and Information Security and Privacy. Session 3: Information Security Methodology. Presenter: Freddy Tan
Module 6: Network and Information Security and Privacy Session 3: Information Security Methodology Presenter: Freddy Tan Learning Objectives Understanding the administrative, physical, and technical aspects
NIST Special Publication
NIST Special Publication 800-171 Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Information Systems and Organizations Ryan Bonner Brightline WHAT IS INFORMATION SECURITY? Personnel Security
Balancing Between Risk and Compliance
Balancing Between Risk and Compliance Dave Mann, Ph.D. Senior Security Strategist BindView Development Business is risky! Want low risk? Get a savings account Risk Appetite = Organizational need for risk
High Assurance Evaluations Challenges in Formal Security Policy Modeling & Covert Channel Analysis. Sai Pulugurtha September 24, 2008
High Assurance Evaluations Challenges in Formal Security Policy Modeling & Covert Channel Analysis Sai Pulugurtha September 24, 2008 Overview Introduction and Goals SPM and CCA Requirements in Common Criteria
Securing your Virtualized Datacenter. Charu Chaubal Senior Architect, Technical Marketing 6 November, 2008
Securing your Virtualized Datacenter Charu Chaubal Senior Architect, Technical Marketing 6 November, 2008 Agenda VMware Virtualization Technology How Virtualization Affects Datacenter Security Keys to
National Information Assurance Partnership
National Information Assurance Partnership TM Common Criteria Evaluation and Validation Scheme Validation Report Xceedium Gatekeeper Version 3.6 Report Number: CCEVS-VR-06-0048 Dated: 31 October 2006 Version: