Fuzzy Logic Controller

Similar documents
FUZZY LOGIC TECHNIQUES. on random processes. In such situations, fuzzy logic exhibits immense potential for

Why Fuzzy Fuzzy Logic and Sets Fuzzy Reasoning. DKS - Module 7. Why fuzzy thinking?

Introduction 3 Fuzzy Inference. Aleksandar Rakić Contents

FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEMS

Lecture notes. Com Page 1

CHAPTER 5 FUZZY LOGIC CONTROL

CHAPTER 3 FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM

7. Decision Making

Fuzzy logic controllers

Fuzzy Expert Systems Lecture 8 (Fuzzy Systems)

MODELING FOR RESIDUAL STRESS, SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND TOOL WEAR USING AN ADAPTIVE NEURO FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM

Introduction to Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Systems Adel Nadjaran Toosi

Dinner for Two, Reprise

FUZZY INFERENCE. Siti Zaiton Mohd Hashim, PhD

CHAPTER 3 ADAPTIVE NEURO-FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM

Fuzzy Logic : Introduction

Chapter 7 Fuzzy Logic Controller

CHAPTER 4 FREQUENCY STABILIZATION USING FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER

Development of a Generic and Configurable Fuzzy Logic Systems Library for Real-Time Control Applications using an Object-oriented Approach

fuzzylite a fuzzy logic control library in C++

Figure 2-1: Membership Functions for the Set of All Numbers (N = Negative, P = Positive, L = Large, M = Medium, S = Small)

Final Exam. Controller, F. Expert Sys.., Solving F. Ineq.} {Hopefield, SVM, Comptetive Learning,

Lecture 5 Fuzzy expert systems: Fuzzy inference Mamdani fuzzy inference Sugeno fuzzy inference Case study Summary

Fuzzy if-then rules fuzzy database modeling

Fuzzy Reasoning. Linguistic Variables

Fuzzy Systems (1/2) Francesco Masulli

Chapter 4 Fuzzy Logic

European Journal of Science and Engineering Vol. 1, Issue 1, 2013 ADAPTIVE NEURO-FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION OF AN INDUCTION MOTOR

AUTONOMOUS ROBOT NAVIGATION BASED ON FUZZY LOGIC AND REINFORCEMENT LEARNING

Fuzzy rule-based decision making model for classification of aquaculture farms

On the use of Fuzzy Logic Controllers to Comply with Virtualized Application Demands in the Cloud

MECHATRONICS 3M LECTURE NOTES. Prepared by Frank Wornle School of Mechanical Engineering The University of Adelaide 1 0.

ANALYTICAL STRUCTURES FOR FUZZY PID CONTROLLERS AND APPLICATIONS

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Uncertainty: fuzzy systems

A New Fuzzy Neural System with Applications

Fuzzy Networks for Complex Systems. Alexander Gegov University of Portsmouth, UK

CHAPTER 3 FUZZY RULE BASED MODEL FOR FAULT DIAGNOSIS

CHAPTER 4 FUZZY LOGIC, K-MEANS, FUZZY C-MEANS AND BAYESIAN METHODS

Machine Learning & Statistical Models

Fuzzy If-Then Rules. Fuzzy If-Then Rules. Adnan Yazıcı

Intelligent Control. 4^ Springer. A Hybrid Approach Based on Fuzzy Logic, Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms. Nazmul Siddique.

CHAPTER 3 INTELLIGENT FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER

In the Name of God. Lecture 17: ANFIS Adaptive Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System

A framework for fuzzy models of multiple-criteria evaluation

CHAPTER 6 SOLUTION TO NETWORK TRAFFIC PROBLEM IN MIGRATING PARALLEL CRAWLERS USING FUZZY LOGIC

Fuzzy Based Decision System for Gate Limiter of Hydro Power Plant

COSC 6339 Big Data Analytics. Fuzzy Clustering. Some slides based on a lecture by Prof. Shishir Shah. Edgar Gabriel Spring 2017.

COSC 6397 Big Data Analytics. Fuzzy Clustering. Some slides based on a lecture by Prof. Shishir Shah. Edgar Gabriel Spring 2015.

Fuzzy Reasoning. Outline

Prototyping Design and Learning in Outdoor Mobile Robots operating in unstructured outdoor environments

Design of Obstacle Avoidance System for Mobile Robot using Fuzzy Logic Systems

CHAPTER 3 MULTI AGENT ROBOT CONTROL BASED ON TYPE-2 FUZZY AND ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION

A Software Tool: Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Toolbox

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (IJCET)

Fuzzy Mod. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science University of California, Berkeley, CA Generalized Neural Networks

Fuzzy Logic Based Path Planning for Quadrotor

Design of Neuro Fuzzy Systems

Optimization with linguistic variables

Transactions on Information and Communications Technologies vol 16, 1996 WIT Press, ISSN

POSITION CONTROL OF DC SERVO MOTOR USING FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER

Background Fuzzy control enables noncontrol-specialists. A fuzzy controller works with verbal rules rather than mathematical relationships.

Starting with FisPro

About the Tutorial. Audience. Prerequisites. Disclaimer& Copyright. Fuzzy Logic

Fuzzy Logic Approach towards Complex Solutions: A Review

ANALYSIS AND REASONING OF DATA IN THE DATABASE USING FUZZY SYSTEM MODELLING

Aircraft Landing Control Using Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks

Hybrid Genetic-Fuzzy Approach to Autonomous Mobile Robot

Chapter 3 MODELING OF SHUNT FACTS DEVICES. The Shunt FACTS Devices are used for voltage control and

What is all the Fuzz about?

SOLUTION: 1. First define the temperature range, e.g. [0 0,40 0 ].

A Brief Idea on Fuzzy and Crisp Sets

A Predictive Controller for Object Tracking of a Mobile Robot

Приложение на Теорията на Размитата Логика при Моделирането на Бизнес Процеси и Вземане на Управленски Решения

Artificial Intelligent Fuzzy Logic Controller Applied on 6DOF Robot Arm Using LabVIEW and FPGA

Inducing Fuzzy Decision Trees in Non-Deterministic Domains using CHAID

Unit 7. Fuzzy Control with Examples. Module FUZ; Ulrich Bodenhofer 186

Fuzzy Set, Fuzzy Logic, and its Applications

Reduction in Space Complexity And Error Detection/Correction of a Fuzzy controller

Multi objective linear programming problem (MOLPP) is one of the popular

Artificial Intelligence for Interactive Media and Games CS/IMGD 4100 (B 16) 1. Background and Motivation

Neural Networks Lesson 9 - Fuzzy Logic

ANFIS: ADAPTIVE-NETWORK-BASED FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEMS (J.S.R. Jang 1993,1995) bell x; a, b, c = 1 a

Learning of Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems using Simulated Annealing

REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTY: FUZZY LOGIC

A Proposition for using Mathematical Models Based on a Fuzzy System with Application

A Framework of Adaptive T-S type Rough-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ARFIS)

A control-based algorithm for rate adaption in MPEG-DASH

OPTIMIZATION. Optimization. Derivative-based optimization. Derivative-free optimization. Steepest descent (gradient) methods Newton s method

Advanced Inference in Fuzzy Systems by Rule Base Compression

^ Springer. Computational Intelligence. A Methodological Introduction. Rudolf Kruse Christian Borgelt. Matthias Steinbrecher Pascal Held

Lotfi Zadeh (professor at UC Berkeley) wrote his original paper on fuzzy set theory. In various occasions, this is what he said

The Integrated Design of Fuzzy Collision-Avoidance and H -Autopilots on Ships

Unit V. Neural Fuzzy System

CS Introduction to Data Mining Instructor: Abdullah Mueen

Web Shopping Expert Systems Using New Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Reasoning

CPS331 Lecture: Fuzzy Logic last revised October 11, Objectives: 1. To introduce fuzzy logic as a way of handling imprecise information

TOOL WEAR CONDITION MONITORING IN TAPPING PROCESS BY FUZZY LOGIC

Learning in Pursuit-Evasion Differential Games Using Reinforcement Fuzzy Learning. Badr Al Faiya, B.Sc.

CHAPTER 3 A FAST K-MODES CLUSTERING ALGORITHM TO WAREHOUSE VERY LARGE HETEROGENEOUS MEDICAL DATABASES

On the Use of Fuzzy Techniques for Partial Scan Insertion Based on the Testability metrics

Transcription:

Fuzzy Logic Controller Debasis Samanta IIT Kharagpur dsamanta@iitkgp.ac.in 23.01.2016 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 1 / 34

Applications of Fuzzy Logic Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 2 / 34

Fuzzy Systems : Fuzzy Logic Controller Concept of fuzzy theory can be applied in many applications, such as fuzzy reasoning, fuzzy clustering, fuzzy programming etc. Out of all these applications, fuzzy reasoning, also called fuzzy logic controller (FLC) is an important application. Fuzzy logic controllers are special expert systems. In general, a FLC employs a knowledge base expressed in terms of a fuzzy inference rules and a fuzzy inference engine to solve a problem. We use FLC where an exact mathematical formulation of the problem is not possible or very difficult. These difficulties are due to non-linearities, time-varying nature of the process, large unpredictable environment disturbances etc. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 3 / 34

Fuzzy Systems : Fuzzy Logic Controller A general scheme of a fuzzy controller is shown in the following figure. Fuzzy Controller Defuzzification module actions Input Fuzzy rule base Fuzzy inference engine Process to be controlled Fuzzification module Conditions Output Figure 1 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 4 / 34

Fuzzy Systems : Fuzzy Logic Controller A general fuzzy controller consists of four modules: 1 a fuzzy rule base, 2 a fuzzy inference engine, 3 a fuzzification module, and 4 a defuzzification module. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 5 / 34

Fuzzy Systems : Fuzzy Logic Controller As shown in Figure 1, a fuzzy controller operates by repeating a cycle of the following four steps : 1 Measurements (inputs) are taken of all variables that represent relevant condition of controller process. 2 These measurements are converted into appropriate fuzzy sets to express measurements uncertainties. This step is called fuzzification. 3 The fuzzified measurements are then used by the inference engine to evaluate the control rules stroed in the fuzzy rule base. The result of this evaluation is a fuzzy set (or several fuzzy sets) defined on the universe of possible actions. 4 This output fuzzy set is then converted into a single (crisp) value (or a vector of values). This is the final step called defuzzification. The defuzzified values represent actions to be taken by the fuzzy contoller. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 6 / 34

Fuzzy Systems : Fuzzy Logic Controller There are two approaches of FLC known. 1 Mamdani approach 2 Takagi and sugeno s approach Mamdani approach follows linguistic fuzzy modeling and chacterized by its high interpretability and low accuracy. On the other hand, Takagi and Sugeno s approach follows precise fuzzy modeling and obtains high accuracy but at the cost of low interpretabily. We illustrate the above two approaches with two examples. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 7 / 34

Mamdani approach : Mobile Robot Consider the control of navigation of a mobile robot in the pressure of a number of moving objects. To make the problem simple, consider only four moving objects, each of equal size and moving with the same speed. A typical scenario is shown in Figure 2. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 8 / 34

Mamdani approach : Mobile Robot O 2 O 3 D O 1 R S O 4 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 9 / 34

Mamdani approach : Mobile Robot We consider two parameters : D, the distance from the robot to an object and θ the angle of motion of an object with respect to the robot. The value of these parameters with respect to the most critical object will decide an output called deviation (δ). We assume the range of values of D is [0.1,... 2.2] in meter and θ is [-90,..., 0,... 90] in degree. After identifying the relevant input and output variables of the controller and their range of values, the Mamdani approach is to select some meaningful states called linguistic states for each variable and express them by appropriate fuzzy sets. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 10 / 34

Linguistic States For the current example, we consider the following linguistic states for the three parameters. Distance is represented using four linguistic states: 1 VN : Very Near 2 NR : Near 3 VF : Very Far 4 FR : Far Angle (for both angular direction (θ) and deviation (δ)) are represented using five linguistic states: 1 LT : Left 2 AL : Ahead Left 3 AA: Ahead 4 AR : Ahead Right 5 RT : Right Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 11 / 34

Linguistic States Three different fuzzy sets for the three different parameters are given below (Figure 3). VN NR FR VF 1.0 D 1.0 0.0 1.04 0.1 0.8 1.5 2.2 Distance D in mt 1.0 LT AL AA AR RT 1.0 LT AL AA AR RT 0.0 0.0-90 -45 0 45 90-90 -45 0 45 90 Angle ɵ in degree Deviation in degree Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 12 / 34

Fuzzy rule base Once the fuzzy sets of all parameters are worked out, our next step in FLC design is to decide fuzzy rule base of the FLC. The rule base for the FLC of mobile robot is shown in the form of a table below. LT AL AA AR RT VN AA AR AL AL AA NR AA AA RT AA AA FR AA AA AR AA AA VF AA AA AA AA AA Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 13 / 34

Fuzzy rule base for the mobile robot Note that this rule base defines 20 rules for all possible instances. These rules are simple rules and take in the following forms. Rule 1: If (distance is VN ) and (angle is LT) Then (deviation is AA).. Rule 13: If (distance is FR ) and (angle is AA) Then (deviation is AR).. Rule 20: Rule 1: If (distance is VF ) and (angle is RT) Then (deviation is AA) Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 14 / 34

Fuzzification of inputs The next step is the fuzzification of inputs. Let us consider, at any instante, the object O 3 is critical to the Mobile Robot and distance D = 1.04 m and angle θ = 30 o (see Figure 2). For this input, we are to decide the deviation δ of the robot as output. From the given fuzzy sets and input parameters values, we say that the distance D = 1.04m may be called as either NR (near) or FR (far). Similarly, the input angle θ = 30 o can be declared as either AA (ahead) or AR(ahead right). Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 15 / 34

Fuzzification of inputs Hence, we are to determine the membership values corresponding to these values, which is as follows. x = 1.04m µ NR (x) = 0.6571 µ FR (x) = 0.3429 y = 30 o µ AA (y) = 0.3333 µ AR (y) = 0.6667 NR FR AA AR 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8 1.5 1.04 x 2.2-45 0 45 y 30 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 16 / 34

Fuzzification of inputs Hint : Use the principle of similarity. x y = δ 1 δ 2 NR FR AA AR 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8 1.5 1.04 x 2.2-45 0 45 y 30 Thus, x 1 = 1.5 1.04 1.5 0.8, that is, x = 0.6571 y x 1 2 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 17 / 34

Rule strength computation There are many rules in the rule base and all rules may not be applicable. For the given x = 1.04 and θ = 30 o, only following four rules out of 20 rules are firable. R1: If (distance is NR) and (angle is AA) Then (deviation is RT) R2: If (distance is NR) and (angle is AR) Then (deviation is AA) R3: If (distance is FR) and (angle is AA) Then (deviation is AR) R4: If (distance is FR) and (angle is AR) Then (deviation is AA) Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 18 / 34

Rule strength computation The strength (also called α values) of the firable rules are calculated as follows. α(r1) = min(µ NR (x), µ AA (y)) = min(0.6571, 0.3333) = 0.3333 α(r2) = min(µ NR (x), µ AR (y)) = min(0.6571, 0.6667) = 0.6571 α(r3) = min(µ FR (x), µ AA (y)) = min(0.3429, 0.3333) = 0.3333 α(r4) = min(µ FR (x), µ AR (y)) = min(0.3429, 0.6667) = 0.3429 In practice, all rules which are above certain threshold value of rule strngth are selected for the output computation. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 19 / 34

Fuzzy output The next step is to determine the fuzzified outputs corresponding to each fired rules. The working principle of doing this is first discussed and then we illustrate with the running example. Suppose, only two fuzzy rules, R1 and R2, for which we are to decide fuzzy output. R1: IF (s 1 is A 1 ) AND (s 2 is B 1 ) THEN (f is C 1 ) R2: IF (s 1 is A 2 ) AND (s 2 is B 2 ) THEN (f is C 2 ) Suppose, s 1 and s 2 are the inputs for fuzzy variables s 1 and s 2. µ A1, µ A2, µ B1, µ B2, µ C1 and µ C2 are the membership values for different fuzzy sets. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 20 / 34

Fuzzy output The fuzzy output computation is graphically shows in the following figure. A1 B 1 C1 A2 B2 C 2 C Combine output * s 1 * s 2 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 21 / 34

Fuzzy output Note: We take min of membership function values for each rule. Output membership function is obtained by aggregating the membership function of result of each rule. Fuzzy output is nothing but fuzzy OR of all output of rules. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 22 / 34

Illustration : Mobile Robot For four rules, we find the following results. NR AA RT 1.0 R1 : 0.0 0.3333 0.8 1.5 0 45 45 90 1.0 NR AR AA R2 : 0.0 1.0 0.8 1.5 0 45 AA -45 0 45 AR 0.6571 R3 : 0.0 1.0 0.8 1.5 0 45 AR 0 45 90 AA 0.3333 R4 : 0.0 0.8 1.5 0 45-45 0 45 0.3333 D=1.04 Ɵ = 30 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 23 / 34

Illustration : Mobile Robot AA AR RT 0.6571 0.34 0.3333-45 0 45 90 Aggregation of all results Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 24 / 34

Defuzzification The fuzzy output needs to be defuzzified and its crisp value has to be determined for the output to take decision. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 25 / 34

Illustration : Mobile Robot From the combined fuzzified output for all four fired rules, we get the crisp value using Center of Sum method as follows. v = 12.5 71+25 45+25.56 0+25.56 0 12.5+39.79+25+25.56 = 19.59 1.0 39.7/0 AA AR RT 0.5 A3 0.6571 0.34 A2 A4 A1 0.3333-45 0 45 90 25.56 / 0 25/45 12.5 / 71 Conclusion : Therefore, the robot should deviate by 19.58089 degree towards the right with respect to the line joining to the move of direction to avoid collision with the obstacle O 3. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 26 / 34

Takagi and Sugeno s approach In this approach, a rule is composed of fuzzy antecedent and functional consequent parts. Thus, any i-th rule, in this approach is represented by If (x 1 is A i 1 ) and (x 2 is A i 2 )... and (x n is A i n) Then, y i = a i 0 + ai 1 x 1 + a i 2 x 2 +... + a i nx n where, a 0, a 1, a 2,... a n are the co-efficients. The weight of i-th rule can be determined for a set of inputs x 1, x 2,... x n as follows. w i = µ i A 1 (x 1 ) µ i A 2 (x 2 )... µ i A n (x n ) where A 1, A 2,..., A n indicates membership function distributions of the linguistic hedges used to represent the input variables and µ denotes membership function value. The combined action then can be obtained as y = k i w i y i k i w i ; where k denotes the total number of rules. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 27 / 34

Illustration: Consider two inputs I 1 and I 2. These two inputs have the following linguistic states : I 1 : L(low), M(Medium), H(High) I 2 : NR(Near), FR (Far), VF(Very Far) Note: The rule base of such as system is decided by a maximum of 3 3 = 9 feasible rules. Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 28 / 34

Illustration: The output of any i-th rule can be expressed by the following. y i = f (I 1, I 2 ) = aj ii 1 + bk i I 2 ; where, j,k = 1,2,3. Suppose : a1 i = 1, ai 2 = 2, ai 3 = 3 if I 1 = L, M and H, respectively. b1 i = 1, bi 2 = 2, bi 3 = 3 if I 2 = NR, FR, and VF, respectively. We have to calculate the output of FLC for I 1 = 6.0 and I 2 = 2.2 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 29 / 34

Illustration: Given the distribution functions for I 1 and I 2 as below. I 2 I 1 1.0 L M H 1.0 NR FR VF 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 I 1 I 2 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 30 / 34

Solution a) The input I 1 = 6.0 can be called either L or M. Similarly, the input I 2 = 2.2 can be declared either FR or VF. b) Using the principal of similarity of triangle, we have the following. µ L (I 1 ) = 0.8 µ M (I 1 ) = 0.2 µ FR (I 2 ) = 0.8 µ VF (I 2 ) = 0.2 c) For the input set, following four rules can be fired out of all 9 rules. R1: I 1 is L and I 2 is FR R2: I 1 is L and I 2 is VF R3: I 1 is M and I 2 is FR R4: I 1 is M and I 2 is VF Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 31 / 34

Solution d) Now, the weights for each of the above rules can be determined as follows. R1: w 1 = µ L µ FR = 0.8 0.8 = 0.6 R2: w 2 = µ L µ VF = 0.8 0.2 = 0.16 R3: w 3 = µ M µ FR = 0.2 0.8 = 0.16 R4: w 4 = µ M µ VF = 0.2 0.2 = 0.6 e) The functional consequent values for each rules can be calculated as below. y 1 = I 1 + 2I 2 = 6.0 + 2 2.2 = 10.4 y 2 = I 1 + 3I 2 = 6.0 + 3 2.2 = 12.6 y 3 = 2I 1 + 2I 2 = 2 6.0 + 2 2.2 = 16.4 y 4 = 2I 1 + 3I 2 = 2 6.0 + 3 2.2 = 18.6 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 32 / 34

Solution f) Therefore, the output y of the controller can be determined as follows. y = w 1 y 1 +w 2 y 2 +w 3 y 3 +w 4 y 4 w 1 +w 2 +w 3 +w 4 = 12.04 Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 33 / 34

Happy Learning Debasis Samanta (IIT Kharagpur) Soft Computing Applications 23.01.2016 34 / 34