Study on Feebly Open Set with Respect to an Ideal Topological Spaces

Similar documents
The Connectivity Order of Links

BoxPlot++ Zeina Azmeh, Fady Hamoui, Marianne Huchard. To cite this version: HAL Id: lirmm

Kernel perfect and critical kernel imperfect digraphs structure

Every 3-connected, essentially 11-connected line graph is hamiltonian

The optimal routing of augmented cubes.

The Proportional Colouring Problem: Optimizing Buffers in Radio Mesh Networks

Setup of epiphytic assistance systems with SEPIA

Representation of Finite Games as Network Congestion Games

THE COVERING OF ANCHORED RECTANGLES UP TO FIVE POINTS

Tacked Link List - An Improved Linked List for Advance Resource Reservation

Jessie Theodore and V. Beulah. Department of Mathematics, Sarah Tucker College, Tirunelveli, India. Abstract

Blind Browsing on Hand-Held Devices: Touching the Web... to Understand it Better

Multimedia CTI Services for Telecommunication Systems

Traffic Grooming in Bidirectional WDM Ring Networks

Relabeling nodes according to the structure of the graph

Fault-Tolerant Storage Servers for the Databases of Redundant Web Servers in a Computing Grid

Service Reconfiguration in the DANAH Assistive System

DANCer: Dynamic Attributed Network with Community Structure Generator

NP versus PSPACE. Frank Vega. To cite this version: HAL Id: hal

SDLS: a Matlab package for solving conic least-squares problems

How to simulate a volume-controlled flooding with mathematical morphology operators?

Mokka, main guidelines and future

Comparison of spatial indexes

HySCaS: Hybrid Stereoscopic Calibration Software

Minor-monotone crossing number

A Voronoi-Based Hybrid Meshing Method

KeyGlasses : Semi-transparent keys to optimize text input on virtual keyboard

Branch-and-price algorithms for the Bi-Objective Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows

QuickRanking: Fast Algorithm For Sorting And Ranking Data

Moveability and Collision Analysis for Fully-Parallel Manipulators

LaHC at CLEF 2015 SBS Lab

Quasi-tilings. Dominique Rossin, Daniel Krob, Sebastien Desreux

Regularization parameter estimation for non-negative hyperspectral image deconvolution:supplementary material

An FCA Framework for Knowledge Discovery in SPARQL Query Answers

Natural Language Based User Interface for On-Demand Service Composition

Change Detection System for the Maintenance of Automated Testing

An Experimental Assessment of the 2D Visibility Complex

Scalewelis: a Scalable Query-based Faceted Search System on Top of SPARQL Endpoints

Acyclic Coloring of Graphs of Maximum Degree

Catalogue of architectural patterns characterized by constraint components, Version 1.0

Simulations of VANET Scenarios with OPNET and SUMO

Fuzzy sensor for the perception of colour

Linux: Understanding Process-Level Power Consumption

A Resource Discovery Algorithm in Mobile Grid Computing based on IP-paging Scheme

An Efficient Numerical Inverse Scattering Algorithm for Generalized Zakharov-Shabat Equations with Two Potential Functions

Linked data from your pocket: The Android RDFContentProvider

Zigbee Wireless Sensor Network Nodes Deployment Strategy for Digital Agricultural Data Acquisition

Fuzzy interpolation and level 2 gradual rules

lambda-min Decoding Algorithm of Regular and Irregular LDPC Codes

Spectral Active Clustering of Remote Sensing Images

Emerging and scripted roles in computer-supported collaborative learning

SIM-Mee - Mobilizing your social network

Induced minors and well-quasi-ordering

Very Tight Coupling between LTE and WiFi: a Practical Analysis

Taking Benefit from the User Density in Large Cities for Delivering SMS

Robust IP and UDP-lite header recovery for packetized multimedia transmission

Syrtis: New Perspectives for Semantic Web Adoption

X-Kaapi C programming interface

Open Digital Forms. Hiep Le, Thomas Rebele, Fabian Suchanek. HAL Id: hal

Real-Time Collision Detection for Dynamic Virtual Environments

ASAP.V2 and ASAP.V3: Sequential optimization of an Algorithm Selector and a Scheduler

Malware models for network and service management

Scan chain encryption in Test Standards

From medical imaging to numerical simulations

IntroClassJava: A Benchmark of 297 Small and Buggy Java Programs

Comparison of radiosity and ray-tracing methods for coupled rooms

Primitive roots of bi-periodic infinite pictures

A Practical Evaluation Method of Network Traffic Load for Capacity Planning

Computing and maximizing the exact reliability of wireless backhaul networks

Real-time FEM based control of soft surgical robots

Mapping classifications and linking related classes through SciGator, a DDC-based browsing library interface

Quality of Service Enhancement by Using an Integer Bloom Filter Based Data Deduplication Mechanism in the Cloud Storage Environment

Multi-atlas labeling with population-specific template and non-local patch-based label fusion

Teaching Encapsulation and Modularity in Object-Oriented Languages with Access Graphs

Sliding HyperLogLog: Estimating cardinality in a data stream

Application of Artificial Neural Network to Predict Static Loads on an Aircraft Rib

A Short SPAN+AVISPA Tutorial

Interaction between ring shaped permanent magnets with symbolic gradients: application to magnetic bearing system optimization

Implementing an Automatic Functional Test Pattern Generation for Mixed-Signal Boards in a Maintenance Context

Deformetrica: a software for statistical analysis of anatomical shapes

FIT IoT-LAB: The Largest IoT Open Experimental Testbed

Comparator: A Tool for Quantifying Behavioural Compatibility

DSM GENERATION FROM STEREOSCOPIC IMAGERY FOR DAMAGE MAPPING, APPLICATION ON THE TOHOKU TSUNAMI

Synthesis of fixed-point programs: the case of matrix multiplication

Modularity for Java and How OSGi Can Help

The New Territory of Lightweight Security in a Cloud Computing Environment

Assisted Policy Management for SPARQL Endpoints Access Control

Solving Geometric Constraints by Homotopy

A 64-Kbytes ITTAGE indirect branch predictor

Using a Medical Thesaurus to Predict Query Difficulty

Efficient implementation of interval matrix multiplication

An Object Oriented Finite Element Toolkit

QAKiS: an Open Domain QA System based on Relational Patterns

Modelling approaches for anion-exclusion in compacted Na-bentonite

Application of RMAN Backup Technology in the Agricultural Products Wholesale Market System

Learning a Representation of a Believable Virtual Character s Environment with an Imitation Algorithm

A Methodology for Improving Software Design Lifecycle in Embedded Control Systems

YANG-Based Configuration Modeling - The SecSIP IPS Case Study

BugMaps-Granger: A Tool for Causality Analysis between Source Code Metrics and Bugs

A N-dimensional Stochastic Control Algorithm for Electricity Asset Management on PC cluster and Blue Gene Supercomputer

Transcription:

Study on Feebly Open Set with Respect to an Ideal Topological Spaces Yiezi K. Al Talkany, Suadud H. Al Ismael To cite this version: Yiezi K. Al Talkany, Suadud H. Al Ismael. Study on Feebly Open Set with Respect to an Ideal Topological Spaces. International Journal of Engineering and Information Systems (IJEAIS), 2017, 1 (6), pp.29-34. <hal-01580859> HAL Id: hal-01580859 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01580859 Submitted on 3 Sep 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of scientific research documents, whether they are published or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers. L archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Study on Feebly Open Set with Respect to an Ideal Topological Spaces Yiezi K. Al Talkany 1 and Suadud H. Al Ismael 2 University of Kufa, College of Education for Girl, Iraq Email: yiezik.altalkany@uokufa.edu.iq Abstract:- The aim of this paper is to introduce the definition of feebly open set in ideal topological space, some relations and properties about this set will be study also. Keywords feebly open set, semi open set, I-open set. Feebly I-open set, local function, ideal topological spaces 1. INTRODUCTION The concept of ideal topology in the classic text was introduced by kuratowski [5], D.Jankovie andt, R Hamlelt [2]. Introduced the concept of I open set in ideal Topological space after that M.E.AbdEl.Monsef E. F.Iashien and A.A.Nasef [6] introduced a new study about the I open set. S. N. Maheshwari and P. C. Jain [8] introduced the concept of feebly open set and feebly closed set in topological spaces, after that many Authors used the concept of feebly open set and feebly closed sets to study another concepts in topological space. N.Ievin [7] introduced the concept of semi open sets and semi closed sets, also semi open set was defined in ideal topological spaces by [3]. If I is an ideal on a topological space(x,t),then we can construct a topological space on X is called [2] In our paper we will define the feebly open set in ideal topological space and study some properties and theorems about it. II-Preliminaries Definition 2.1:- [2] Ideal is a non-empty collection I of subset of X is said to be an ideal on X if it satisfies the following two conditions:- 1- if and then [ heredity ] 2- if and then [ finite additivity] Example 2.2 :- Let * + { * + * + * +} then I is an ideal. Example 2.3 :- Let * + { * + * + * +} then I is not an ideal Example 2.4 :- Let * + * + then I is an ideal Example2.5 :- Let * + * + then I is not an ideal Definition 2.6:-[2] Let (X,T) be a space with an ideal I on X. Then ( ) * for every ( ) ( ) + Example 2.7:- Let * + { * + * + * +} { * + * + * + * +} Then * + =* +, * + =,* + =* + Theorem 2.8:- [2] Let (X,T) be a space with I is an ideal on X and let A and B be subsets of X Then :- 29

1-2- ( ) ( ) ( is acloed subset to f cl(a)) 3- ( ) 4- ( ) Theorem 2.9:- [4] Let (X,T,I) be a space and let * 1- ( ) ( ) 2- ( ) ( ). Corollary 2.10:- [2] For ( ) we have + be any family of subsets of X. Then we have 1- (* +) ( ), means that is a closurepoint of A iff (* +) 2- ( ( )) Definition 2.11 :- [6] Given a space (X,T,I) and, A is said to be I open if ( ). We denote by ( ) * ( )+ or simply write I.o for Io (X,T) when there is no chance for confusion. Example 2.12:- Let * + with a topology { * + * + * +}, { * +} Then {* + * + * + * + * + * + * + * + } Remark 2.13 :-[6] It is clearly that, I open set and open set are independent concepts Example 2.14 :- Let * + with a topology { * + * + * +} and { * +}. Then * + ( ) but * +. Example 2.15:- Let X be as in Example 2.14, { * + * + * +} and { * + * + * +} it is clear that * +, but * + ( ). Remark 2.16:-[2] Let ( ) then 1- if then A is called dense in it self 2- if then A is called closed. 3- if then A is called - perfect. Proposition 2.17 :- Let ( ) be an ideal topology space then every closed I open A subset of X is open set Let A is I-open set then A int( ) and since A is -closed set we have A from that we get int( ) ( ) then A int( ) int(a) then A ( ) and since ( ) A then A=int(A) and then for A is open set. Theorem 2.18 :- Let ( ) be an ideal topology space then every dense open set is I open set. Proof :- 30

Let A is open set then A=int(A) and since A int(a) int( ) ( ) ( ) is a open. Theorem 2.19 :- [4] Let ( ) be a space and.then 1- if * + ( ) Then * + ( ) 2- if ( ) and. Then ( ). Definition 2.20:- [6] A subset ( ) is called I closed set if its complement of I open set. Example 2.21:- Let * + with a topology { * + * + * +}, { * +} then ** + * + * + * + * + * + * + +. Definition 2.22:- [7] A subset A of an ideal topological space (X,T,I) is said to be 1) Semi open in (X,T) if ( ( )). 2) Semi-closed if X-A semi-open in (X,T) Example 2.23:- Let * + { * + * + * +}. S.O(X)= {* + * + * + } S.C(X)={{b,c},{a,c},{c},ɸ} Definition 2.24:-[3] A subset A of an ideal topological space (X,T,I) is said to be semi-i-open if A (int(a)). Definition 2.26:- [8] A subset A of a topological space X is said to be feebly open set if ( ( )) Lemmas 2.27:-[9] In any topological space (X,T) Every feebly open set is semi open set III- Feebly open set in ideal topological space Definition3.1 Let (X,T) be a topological space and I be an ideal defined on X the subset A of X is say to bye feebly I open set in the ideal topological. Space (X,T,I) if ( ( )) and is denoted by F. I. O. Example 3.2:- Let * + { * + * + * +} { * + * + * +} ( ) { * + * + * + * +} ( ) { * + * + * + * +} ( ) * * + * + * + * + * + * + * + * ++. Remark 3.3:- 31

The intersection of two feebly I open need not to be feebly I open since ( ) ( ). Theorem 3.4:-Let (X,T,I) be an IDT If A,B be a F. I. open sets then ( ( )) ( ( )) is F. I. open ( ) ( ( )) ( ( )) ( ( ) ( )) ( ( ) ( ( ) ) Proposition3.5:- If (X,T) is ideal topological space then every feebly I-open T * -closed subset A of X is semi open Let A is feebly I-open set in X then A SCL(int( )) CL(int( )) and since A is -closed set then A CL(int(A)) from that we get that A is semi-open. Theorem 3.6:-[ 3 ] 1- Every open set is semi I open. 2- Every semi I open set is semi open se. Proposition 3.7:- Let (X,T,I) be an ideal topological space then every I open set is F I open set. Let A is I-open set in X then SCL(A) SCL(int( ) A SCL(A) SCL(int( ) then A SCL(int ( ) then A is feebly I-open Theorem 3.8 :- Let (X,T,I) be ideal topological space such that A is dense in itself then every feebly open subset A of X is feebly I open set. if A is feebly open and dense then int(a) int( ) then A SCL(int(A)) SCL(int( ) then Ais feebly I-open. Theorem 3.9 :- Let (X,T,I) be an ideal topological space such that A is( ) closed set then every feebly I open subset A of X is feebly open. Let A is feebly I-open and A then int( ) int(a) SCL(int( ) ) SCL(int(A)) since A is feebly I-open then A SCL(int( )) then A SCL(int(A)) then A is feebly open. Theorem 3.10:- if (X,T,I) be an ideal topological space then every I-open T * -closed set is semi-i-open Proof: Let A is I-open set then A (int( ).and since A is -closed Then A int( ) int(a) A ( ( )) int(a) ( ( )) = (int(a)) and then A is semi- I open 32

The following diagram gives us all the above relations discussed I-OPEN SET OPEN SET Semi I-OPEN SET Feebly I- open set Feebly open set Semi open set : mean that the set is T * -Closed Mean that the set is *-dense REFERENCES [1] A.P.Dhana Balan,R. Buvane swari ''on totally feebly continuous functions''mathemaical sciences international research j, V 3, lssue 2(2014) [2] D. Jankovic and T. R. Hamlett, "New topologies from old via ideals", Amer. Math. Monthly, 97(4) (1990), 295-310. [3] E. Hatir and T.Noiri," On semi- -open sets and semi- -continuous functions", Acta. Math. Hungar. 107(4)(2005), 345-353. [4] E. Lashien and A.A.Nasef,''on Ideals In General Topology'', Delta.J.Sci.15(2)1991 [5] K. Kuratowski." Topology, Vol. I", Academic press, New York, 1966 [6] M. E. Abd El-Monsef, E. F. Lashien, and A. A. Nasef, On I-open sets and I-continuous functions, Kyungpook Mathematical Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 21 30, 1992. 33

[7] N. Levine,"Semi-open sets and semi-continuity in topological spaces", Amer. Math. Monthly, 70 (1963), 36-41. [8] S.N.Maheshwari and P.G.Jain,''some new mappings'',mathematica,vol.24(47), 1982 [9] Y. K. Altalkany, " Study on Feebly local Functions "Submitted. 34