11:00-12: 00 Panel on Converging IoT standards Moderator: Patrick Guillemin, WG03 Chair 3GPP, onem2m, ETSI SmartM2M, ITU-T SG20, IEEE P2413, ISO/IEC JTC1 WG10, CEN/CENELEC, IIC, OPC and Platform I4.0, IETF, W3C
3GPP, onem2m, ETSI SmartM2M, ITU-T SG20, IEEE P2413, ISO/IEC JTC1 WG10, CEN/CENELEC, IIC, OPC and Platform I4.0, IETF, W3C 3GPP has been introduced by ETSI Director General Luis Jorge Romero onem2m, Omar Elloumi Nokia, onem2m TP Chairman ETSI TC SmartM2M, Enrico Scarrone Telecom Italia, SmartM2M Chairman ITU-T SG20, Marco Carugi, NEC Corporation, ITU-T SG20 Rapporteur and Mentor IEEE P2413, Paul Murdock Landis+Gyr ISO/IEC JTC1 WG10 (IoT), Henri Barthel GS1 CEN/CENELEC Bernhard Thies, CENELEC President IIC Jean-Pierre Desbenoit, Schneider-Electric OPC and Platform I4.0, Thomas Hahn, Siemens IETF Georgios Karagiannis, Huawei Technologies W3C Dave Raggett is excused 2
What is it? Like an Android for the Internet of Things But it sits both on the field devices/sensors and in servers And it is a standard not controlled by a single private company Where can I use it? Deliverables Several innerworkings Typically in any IoT large scale deployment where: You have multiple networks/device types, multiple apps Data is generated once, consumed multiple times (semantics & privacy are builtin) Optimized for cloud, gateway and cross domain communications, but can be used natively on devices Technical report, technical specifications Interoperability events Several industry driven open source implementation AllSeen OIC (now OCF) LWM2M 3GPP Others have been developed by industry (LoRA, Zwave, etc.) 3
ETSI TC SmartM2M ETSI SmartM2M (started in Jan 2009): It has developed two releases of IOT/M2M specifications R1 (2011) and R2 (2012). It is the initial promoter of the onem2m inititative. With the publication of onem2m Release 1 (2015 - data sharing and communication framework) and Release 2 (2016 - semantic support), the transfer of its core technical work t onem2m has been completed. ETSI Smart M2M is currently focalized on: Lead the ETSI participation and contribution to the EU initiatives in the M2M and IoT areas (Smart Metering, Smart Grid, Smart Cities, etc) Standardize framework for an open ontology (SAREF) to that enables information sharing among IoT devices and servers using different technologies, starting from Smart Appliances end extending it to other domains (energy, buildings, Cities, Agriculture, etc) Supporting the European industry and institutions on the identification and adoption of standards, Bridging the European needs in the area of M2M/IoT towards onem2m and Support visibility and dissemination of onem2m in Europe, Support to Initiative, in particular the WG3 (standardization) with landscape analysis & architectural gap analysis dissemination and community building for standard adoptions in the LSP Develop testing suites for onem2m Support ISG CIM to develop a complementary and integrated component to onem2m, to avoid CIM overlap with onem2m and standard fragmentation. 4
ITU-T Study Group 20 (SG20) Internet of Things (IoT) and smart cities and communities (SC&C) http://www.itu.int/en/itu-t/studygroups/2017-2020/20/pages/default.aspx Established in June 2015 for ITU-T IoT studies consolidation (1 st studies years ago [NID,USN], various SGs) Leading Study Group on: IoT and its applications, SC&C (incl. its services) and IoT identification (some specific studies involve cooperation with SG2, SG11 and SG13, SG17) SG20 responsibilities (2017-2020 study period) include (among others): roadmaps for coordinated development of IoT (and IoT standards database maintenance); big data aspects and intelligent control; use cases and applications (verticals); requirements and capabilities; architectural framework and end-to-end architectures; security, privacy and trust of IoT and SC&C; middleware aspects and platforms; interoperability across verticals; evaluation and assessment of SC&C (guidelines, methodologies, best practices); supervision of JCA (Joint Coordination Activity) on IoT and SC&C [high level coordination within ITU-T & with other SDOs/orgs] Numerous active liaisons with other SDOs/orgs (with some specific plans of enhanced cooperation) and continuous technical cooperation of ITU-T with WG3 (and EIRC previously) e.g. WG3 Oct15 3 deliverables, Aug16 standards roadmap coordination proposal, new HLA studies ITU-T achievements (Recommendations) in numerous technical areas of IoT all approved and ongoing ITU-T IoT specifications collected in IoT Standards Roadmap maintained by JCA SG20 structure evolution proposed by SG20 management team at March17 SG20 meeting From current 6 to 7 Questions, tighter integration between IoT and - SC&C, new areas of focus Few personal considerations: Added value of ITU-T membership on specific matters (e.g. security and privacy) Increasing active participation from developing countries (e.g. use cases, requirements for low cost) Interaction of ITU-T IoT studies with other key study areas will increase : 5G, big data, privacy and trust Enhanced ITU-T cooperation with other SDOs/orgs will be key (see specific areas like architecture, protocols) 5
IEEE P2413 P2413 is a top down approach Follows the recommendations for architecture descriptions defined in ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 Systems and software engineering - Architecture description (2011) ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 Provides a core ontology for the description of architectures Specifies provisions that enforce desired properties of architecture frameworks Can be used to establish a coherent practice for developing architecture frameworks Can be used to assess conformance of an architecture framework http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/2413/intro-to-ieee-p2413.pdf 6
7
ISO/IEC JTC 1/WG10 Internet of Things JTC 1 established a Special Working Group on IoT in 2012. The SWG was changed into a formal WG in 2015. In May 2017, WG10 will be transitioned to a formal Sub Committee. JTC 1/SC 41, Internet of Things and related technologies, will take over the work of WG10 and WG7, Sensor networks. Current work items in JTC1/WG10: ISO/IEC 30141, Internet of Things Reference Architecture: System characteristics, conceptual model, reference model and architecture views for IoT. Draft International Standard by Oct 2017 ISO/IEC 20924, Definition and vocabulary. A terminology foundation for the Internet of Things. 2 nd Committee Draft by March 2017 ISO/IEC 21823-1, Interoperability for Internet of Things Systems, Part 1: Framework. An overview of interoperable IoT systems and framework for interoperability to ensure information exchanges supporting peer-to-peer interoperability of IoT systems and seamless communication among IoT system entities. 1st CD by June 2017 ISO/IEC PDTR 22417, IoT Use cases. Identification of IoT scenarios and use cases based on realworld applications and requirements. To be published by June 2017 Under consideration: 21823-2, Network connectivity; 21823-3. Semantic interoperability has a liaison with JTC1/WG10 and should seek a liaison with the new SC41 All work items above are relevant to The impact of these relatively generic standards remains to be seen 8
ISO/IEC JTC 1/WG10 Internet of Things, Henri Barthel JTC 1 established a Special Working Group on IoT in 2012. The SWG was changed into a formal WG in 2015. In May 2017, WG10 will be transitioned to a formal Sub Committee. JTC 1/SC 41, Internet of Things and related technologies, will take over the work of WG10 and WG7, Sensor networks. Current work items in JTC1/WG10: ISO/IEC 30141, Internet of Things Reference Architecture: System characteristics, conceptual model, reference model and architecture views for IoT. Draft International Standard by Oct 2017 ISO/IEC 20924, Definition and vocabulary. A terminology foundation for the Internet of Things. 2 nd Committee Draft by March 2017 ISO/IEC 21823-1, Interoperability for Internet of Things Systems, Part 1: Framework. An overview of interoperable IoT systems and framework for interoperability to ensure information exchanges supporting peer-to-peer interoperability of IoT systems and seamless communication among IoT system entities. 1st CD by June 2017 ISO/IEC PDTR 22417, IoT Use cases. Identification of IoT scenarios and use cases based on realworld applications and requirements. To be published by June 2017 Under consideration: 21823-2, Network connectivity; 21823-3. Semantic interoperability has a liaison with JTC1/WG10 and should seek a liaison with the new SC41 All work items above are relevant to The impact of these relatively generic standards remains to be seen 9
Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC) http://www.iiconsortium.org/ Created in March 2014, the goal is to lead and coordinate the disparate efforts of industry, academia and the government around the Industrial Internet Over 250 members from all around the world, including academics, SMEs and large Industries IIC is NOT a standardization organization Drive down barriers to entry to the Industrial Internet: ref architecture, security framework, best practices, use-cases, testbeds Main achievements and publications 25 approved testbeds IIRA (Ref Architecture): V1 in 2015, V1.8 Jan 2017 IISF (Security Framework): V1 in Sept 2016 Business Strategy and Innovation framework: V1 in Nov 2016 IICF (Connectivity Reference Architecture): V1 in Feb 2017 (will come soon) More than 20 active liaisons with other organizations/sdos 10
The Platform Industrie 4.0 provides support for the coordinated and organized transition to the digital economy is a project of and for society as a whole which requires close cooperation among the private sector, academia, politics, trade unions and associations More than 250 active participants from approx. 150 institutions Strategic directions/ Recommended actions SME International cooperation Digital Transformation Initiation of cross-sector standards Coordination of national and international standards Strengthen the German international collaborations Network of test centers Practical testing Validated input for standardization Source: Plattform Industrie 4.0, SCI 4.0, LNI 4.0 11
OPC UA secure, reliable, multi-vendor, multi-platform, multi domain interoperability from sensor to enterprise OPC Foundation - More than 450 members around the world - Companies from Automation & IT - International standard IEC62541 Client/Server Services Browse Read / Write Method Calls Subscriptions Protocols UA Binary TCP HTTPS / UA Binary Webservices Vendor Specific Extensions Companion Information Models Built-in Information Models OPC UA Meta Model OPC UA architecture - Definition 2003 2006 - Verification/Implementation 2006 2008 - First OPC Foundation Release 2009 - Also available as IEC 62541 - Platform independence - Standard internet and IP based protocols - Built in security features - Generic object model - Extensible type system - Scalability through profiles 12
IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) IoT support since 2005 when started with 6LoWPAN (IPv6 over Low-power WPAN) Now IoT Directorate: advisory group of experts that coordinate within IETF IoT groups and increase IETF IoT standards visibility to external SDOs, alliances, and other organizations IoT related IETF WGs: 6Lo (IPv6 over Networks of Resource-constrained Nodes); ROLL (Routing Over Low-power and Lossy networks); CORE (Constrained RESTful Environments); ACE (Authentication and Authorization for Constrained Environments) (ACE); CBOR (Concise Binary Object Representation Maintenance and Extensions); 6tisch (IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e) IPWAVE (IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments); lpwan (IPv6 over Low Power Wide-Area Networks); Detnet (Deterministic Networking); LWIG (Light-weight Implementation Guide) IoT related IRTF RGs: T2TRG (Thing 2 Thing) Some Observations: Paradigm shift from closed, vertical solutions to open, general networking solutions Ongoing paradigm shift from devices to thinking about systems and connections between systems Security and privacy are still important challenges Management, interoperability and updatability IETF provides good interoperability from a network perspective, but lacks on application-level interoperability; need for Semantic Interoperability Use of underlying network details are important for the IoT IETF work; More work in area needed More work needed at level of systems on how they are connected and controlled 13