Sii : Simulation of a Ship Ramming Ice

Similar documents
Feasibility study of a semi-empirical simulation model for level ice-breaking

Development of the Compliant Mooring Line Model for FLOW-3D

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Stability Analysis of Tubular Steel Shores. 1. Introduction

GPU Modeling of Ship Operations in Pack Ice

WinFElt Manual. Problem description

FELT(4fe) Finite Element Package FELT(4fe)

State Estimation and Parameter Identification of Flexible Manipulators Based on Visual Sensor and Virtual Joint Model

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A GENERATOR ON AN ELASTIC FOUNDATION

EngiLab Beam.2D User Manual

Transactions on Modelling and Simulation vol 10, 1995 WIT Press, ISSN X

INNWIND.EU 10MW JACKET INTERFACE DOCUMENT FOR PRELIMINARY JACKET DESIGN

Design procedures of seismic-isolated container crane at port

Comparison of open-source code Nemoh with Wamit for cargo ship motions in shallow water

RSPile. Tutorial 3 Grouped Pile Analysis. Pile Analysis Software. Grouped Pile Analysis

Simulation of AJWSP10033_FOLDED _ST_FR

ESD.77 Multidisciplinary System Design Optimization Spring Barge Design Optimization

Chapter 3 Analysis of Original Steel Post

Offshore Platform Fluid Structure Interaction (FSI) Simulation

Example 24 Spring-back

Application nr. 2 (Global Analysis) Effects of deformed geometry of the structures. Structural stability of frames. Sway frames and non-sway frames.

1. Carlos A. Felippa, Introduction to Finite Element Methods,

WP5 - Computational Mechanics Acceleration transducers on Finite Element vehicle models for crash simulations with Ls-Dyna

Design of a Precision Robot Wrist Interface. Patrick Willoughby Advisor: Alexander Slocum MIT Precision Engineering Research Group

FB-MULTIPIER vs ADINA VALIDATION MODELING

Simulation of Connector Assembly C

PD2CAEPIPE - Plant Design-to-CAEPIPE Translator

Stiffness Analysis of the Tracker Support Bracket and Its Bolt Connections

LESM. Linear Elements Structure Model. Version 1.0 August Luiz Fernando Martha

Elfini Solver Verification

Wall thickness= Inlet: Prescribed mass flux. All lengths in meters kg/m, E Pa, 0.3,

Multibody Model for Planetary Gearbox of 500 kw Wind Turbine

Top Layer Subframe and Node Analysis

A METHOD TO MODELIZE THE OVERALL STIFFNESS OF A BUILDING IN A STICK MODEL FITTED TO A 3D MODEL

Simulation of RF HEat Test

Finite Element Course ANSYS Mechanical Tutorial Tutorial 3 Cantilever Beam

LS-DYNA s Linear Solver Development Phase 2: Linear Solution Sequence

VARIOUS APPROACHES USED IN THE SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF THE PIPING SYSTEMS IN NUCLEAR FACILITIES. Introduction

midas Civil Advanced Webinar Date: February 9th, 2012 Topic: General Use of midas Civil Presenter: Abhishek Das Bridging Your Innovations to Realities

Tool Center Position Determination of Deformable Sliding Star by Redundant Measurement

Optimal design of floating platform and substructure for a spar type wind turbine system

CHAPTER 3. Elementary Fluid Dynamics

SolidWorks Motion Study Tutorial

FOUNDATION IN OVERCONSOLIDATED CLAY

PLAXIS 2D - SUBMERGED CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXCAVATION

Since a projectile moves in 2-dimensions, it therefore has 2 components just like a resultant vector: Horizontal Vertical

THE EFFECTS OF THE PLANFORM SHAPE ON DRAG POLAR CURVES OF WINGS: FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSES RESULTS

SMF Transient Voltage Suppressor Diode Series

Tutorial 1: Welded Frame - Problem Description

Effect of Fillet on the Resolution of a Four-Axis Force/Torque Sensor

Finite Element Analysis Dr. B. N. Rao Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Madras. Module - 01 Lecture - 15

EXAMPLE 1. Static Analysis of Cantilever Column (Fixed-Base Column)

Simulation of Connector Assembly AA

Contact Characteristics of Circular-Arc Curvilinear Tooth Gear Drives

Description. 2.8 Robot Motion. Floor-mounting. Dimensions apply to IRB 6400/ Shelf-mounting

0 Graphical Analysis Use of Excel

Parametric Study of Engine Rigid Body Modes

LATERALLY LOADED PILE GROUPS

MA 243 Calculus III Fall Assignment 1. Reading assignments are found in James Stewart s Calculus (Early Transcendentals)

OPENSEES Soil-Pile Interaction Study under Lateral Spread Loading

Comparison of model tests and calculations

SOFTWARE. Sesam user course. 20 February 2017 HydroD Global Analysis Wadam. Ungraded SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL 2014

12 Blocks Bouncing down Slope

SUBMERGED CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXCAVATION

Bi-directional seismic vibration control of spatial structures using passive mass damper consisting of compliant mechanism

2008 International ANSYS Conference

Modeling Skills Stress Analysis J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mech 417

Controllable Suspension Design Using Magnetorheological Fluid

INTERNSHIP REPORT Analysis of a generic lifting table Ruben Teunis s Mechanical Engineering Applied Mechanics, CTW

Bridge Software Institute 2

Design of simple drapery systems to guide the rock falls along the slope

Numerical Modelling of Engineering Structures subjected to Dynamic Seismic Loading

Modeling the Acoustic Scattering from Axially Symmetric Fluid, Elastic, and Poroelastic Objects due to Nonsymmetric Forcing Using COMSOL Multiphysics

Revision of the SolidWorks Variable Pressure Simulation Tutorial J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering. Introduction

Problem description C L. Tank walls. Water in tank

Chapter 5 Modeling and Simulation of Mechanism

CS 231. Deformation simulation (and faces)

A study of Jumper FIV due to multiphase internal flow: understanding life-cycle fatigue. Alan Mueller & Oleg Voronkov

Engineering Effects of Boundary Conditions (Fixtures and Temperatures) J.E. Akin, Rice University, Mechanical Engineering

LECTURE 3-1 AREA OF A REGION BOUNDED BY CURVES

Finite Element Analysis of Dynamic Flapper Valve Stresses

ME 475 FEA of a Composite Panel

Design of Offshore Structures using STAAD.Pro and STAAD.Offshore

UNIT I READING: GRAPHICAL METHODS

Problem O. Isolated Building - Nonlinear Time History Analysis. Steel E =29000 ksi, Poissons Ratio = 0.3 Beams: W24X55; Columns: W14X90

A FIXED-BASE MODEL WITH CLASSICAL NORMAL MODES FOR SOIL- STRUCTURE INTERACTION SYSTEMS

ME Optimization of a Frame

Analysis of a silicon piezoresistive pressure sensor

Ultimate capacity analyses in LS-DYNA. Anders Jonsson,

Lateral Loading of Suction Pile in 3D

Engineering Tool Development

FREE VIBRATION AND EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS OF A BUILDING

STATIC AND DYNAMIC 2-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF CONTINUA

CKAS W15R 7DOF Motion System (1500kg / 3300lb Payload) 6DOF + Infinite Turntable

Design and Analysis for a Large Two-Lens Cell Mount Katie Schwertz OptoMechanics 523: Final Project May 15, 2009

ANALYSIS OF COMPOSITE CONCRETE SLAB ON METAL DECK

RISA 3D. Verification Problems. Rapid Interactive Structural Analysis 3 Dimensional

Calculate Wind Pressure due to Hurricanes

Structural analysis for in-service gas pipeline lowering using numerical method

CRASHWORTHINESS ANALYSIS OF A LOCK GATE IMPACTED BY THREE DIFFERENT RIVER SHIPS

Tutorial #3 LSDyna: Pop Can Crushing Analysis By C. Daley

Transcription:

sii_d_h.mcd Sii : Simulation of a Ship Ramming Ice Claude Daley, Nov. '93 Modified: July, 95, Jan., Mar. 97 a Mathcad 6.+ File File : Sii_D_H - Ship_ice_interaction model for D (head-on) ramming. The model is udated to calculate the cases for the Harmonized Rules. This file calculates the forces on a ship, when ramming a floe of finte thickness and extent. The surge, heave, pitch and bennding of the ship are modelled. The crushing, tipping, and bending of the floe are included. Disclaimer: The model contains idealizations and assumptions. The author believes that the model fairly represents the mechanics that occurs when a ship strikes an ice edge, based on comparison with available data. However, the model contains numerous parameters, many of which have a significant effect on the particular results. Caution should always be used when applying the results.

sii_d_h.mcd INPUT: Ship Parameters The INP vector is copied from the excel sheet or can be supplied by the user Main Particulars: length (m) LBP := INP LBP = 3 beam (m) B := INP B = 4.7 draft (m) T := INP T = 5.46 waterline entrance angle alf := INP deg alf =.6 7 initial penetration initpen. Po (Pa) Po INP exponent ex INP deg stem angle (from vert) gam 9 INP 8 := gam =.47 Block coefficient CB := INP 3 CB =.737 Waterplane coefficient CWP := INP 4 CWP =.8 ship speed (m/s) vship := INP 6 vship = 5.3 INPUT: Ice Parameters := Po 3 6 := ex =. = for p_ice = Po A^ex water density (kg/m^3) ro 5 gravity (m/s^) g 9.8 ice density d:= ro g roice := ro.88 ice thickness (m) floe length (m) floe width (m) ice flex strength (Pa) hice := INP hice = 9 Lfloe := INP Lfloe = 4 Wfloe := INP Wfloe = 4 sigf := INP 6 3 sigf = 8 5

sii_d_h.mcd 3 Calculated Quantities displacement (m^3) mass of ship (kg) area of waterplane (m^) surge stiffness: Longitudinal Moment of Inertia of Waterplane Disp := LBP B T CB M := kx := Disp ro AWP := B LBP CWP Disp = 5 M =.4 8 AWP = 9.665 3 n := n =.54.9 CWP.49 I L n B ( LBP )3 := I L = 4.9 7 Heave Stiffness MN/m K H := AWP d Heave Only K H = F bow δ δ Pitch Stiffness MN-m/rad K P := I L d F bow Pitch Stiffness for Bow Force MN/m Pitch Only K B = F bow δ δ K B := K P LBP F bow Vertical Stiffness at Bow ky := + K B K H Heave + Pitch K BOW = F bow δ δ ky =.789 7 F bow

sii_d_h.mcd 4 Vertical Rigid Body Mass at Bow <= 37% of ship's mass**** (includes added mass). + B 3T My :=. AM Disp ro AM := My = 5.8 7 AM =.873 + Horizontal Rigid Body Mass at Bow Mx := Disp ro.45 <= 5% of ship's mass**** Mx =.474 8 (includes added mass) Generalized bending stress of Pitch/Heave Mode Generalized Mass of st Mode Mf :=.45 LBP 3 Mf = 85 (kg) 45 σh := LBP σh 5 = Pa/m Generalized Stiffness of st Mode kf := 9836. LBP kf =.95 8 (N/m) Natural frequency of st mode om := kf Mf om.55 π Midbody moment of Inertia: = hz Im :=.54 LBP 4 Generalized bending stress of st Mode 97 σf := LBP σf = 3. 8 Pa/m Midbody total Height: Hm :=.5 T Midbody section modulus: Sm := Im Hm

sii_d_h.mcd 5 Ice Force Parameters The following functions determine the ship-ice interaction geometry and forces, based on the ship's bow moving horizontally and vertically, and the ice edge moving vertically (it is assumed that the floe is laterally restrained by other ice). Small pitch angles are assumed. penetration function : vertical projection of area pressure in contact Pen( x, y, z) := [ x ( y + z) tan( gam) ] Area v ( xy,, z) := Pen( x, y, z) tan( alf) Pres( x, y, z) := Po Area v ( xy,, z) ( ex) Pen γ α Pen le γ F v elastic layer thickless for ice and ship (m) ( - a numerical requirement) : ice elastic force (during elastic contact): ice crushing force (during crushing contact) resultant vertical ice force: le F el ( xy,, z, p) := ( Pen( x, y, z) p) F cr ( xy,, z) := Area v ( xy,, z) Pres( x, y, z) Area v ( xy,, z) Pres( x, y, z) () F v ( xy,, z, p) := max min F el ( xy,, z, p) F cr ( xy,, z) le F h resultant horizontal ice force: F h ( xy,, z, p) := F v ( xy,, z, p) tan( gam) crushing velocity: (needed to track crushed depth) Crumv( x, y, z, vx, vy, vz, p) := if[ p < Pen( x, y, z) kl le, max( ( Pen( vx, vy, vz) )), ] kl.999

sii_d_h.mcd 6 Ice Force Limit Calculations z-mass of floe (kg) Mz :=.45 ro hice Lfloe Wfloe Mz = 4.63 floe tipping stiffness (N/m) kz := roice g 3 kz =.947 Lfloe Wfloe max tipping force (N) Fzmax := kz hice 9 Fzmax = 3.74 floe breaking force (N) Fvbend :=. sigf hice Fvbend = 9.6 9 breaking force limited to long floes F vlim := ( Lfloe > hice) Fvbend + ( Lfloe < hice) F vlim = 9.6 9 z-mass of cusp (kg) Mcz :=.45 roice hice 3 5 Mcz =.5 cusp tipping stiffness kcz := ro g 3 5 hice max force on broken cusp Fzcmax := kcz hice 9 Fzcmax = 9.3 9 function to determine if the floe is broken in bending Flex( x, y, z, p, e) := ( e ) F vlim < F v ( xy,, z, p) + ( e > ).64

sii_d_h.mcd 7 Simulation Parameters Damping: surge damping (drag) cx := bow heave damping: critical damping cy cr := ky My cy cr = 3.74 7 % of critical damping (N/ m/s) ship flexure damping ζy :=. cy := ζy ky My cf :=. cy = 3.74 6 ice heave damping cusp heave damping cz :=. kz Mz ccz :=.5 kcz Mcz Initial conditions: y := initpen vship le 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 = surge position - x = surge velocity = pitch position 3= pitch velocity 4= flexure position -y 5= flexure velocity 6= ice position - z 7= ice velocity 8= crushing penetration 9= crushing velocity =breaking condition = change in breaking cond

sii_d_h.mcd 8 Time step: Ty := π My ky <= bow heave period Ty =.798 Tf := om <= st mode period Tf =.943 dt := Tf <= time step (sec.) Time of simulation imax := 3 Tmax := dt imax sec Tmax = 58.87 <= number of time steps <=total simulation time i :=.. imax ii :=.. imax + t := i idt <= time vector

sii_d_h.mcd 9 Simulation Mechanics Response functions for Masses Mx and My These are the accelerations of the masses. Fx( t, Fy( t, Ff( t, := := kx cx y Mx Mx y ky y + My Fz( t, y >. kf My F h y, y, y, y 4 6 8 Mx y y 4 cy My y 3,, y, y 6 8 F kf v y y 4 := y y Mf 4 + Mf min( ( kz y Fzcmax 6 )) cz F v ( y, y, y, y Mz Mz y 4 6 8 ) := +... <-----intact floe + 7 Mz min( ( kz y Fzcmax 6 )) cz F v ( y, y y ( y >. ) Mcz Mz y,, y 4 6 ) 8 + + <---broken cusp 7 Mcz Cr( t, := Crumv y, y, y, y, y, y, y 4 6 5 7 8 Brak( t, Flex y, y, y, y, y 4 6 8 := y and Z vector components = surge position - x y = surge velocity Fx( t, = pitch position 3= pitch velocity y 3 4= flexure position -y Fy( t, 5= flexure velocity y 6= ice position - z 5 7= ice velocity Ff( t, Dty (, ) := 8= crushing penetration y 9= crushing velocity 7 =breaking condition Fz( t, = change in breaking cond Cr( t, y Brak( t,

sii_d_h.mcd Sketch of system cy Ky - Bow Heave Spring My - Bow Heave Mass Mx - Surge Mass cx y x Kx - Surge Spring Kx= pen γ φ kel Ice Force Fice (elastic + crushing) kcr Coupled R-K Difference Equations: Z rkfixed( y,, Tmax, imax, D) <= The simulation takes place by iteratively solving the simultaneous equations in a stepwise manner, using the built-in function rkfixed. := <= SOLVE

sii_d_h.mcd Simulation Results vship = 5.3 Po = 3 6 m/s pa LBP = 3 m Fig. - Bow coordinates vs. time 4 Fig. - Bow coordinates 33.33 motions (m) 6.67 3.33 Y (m) 5 6.67 F v Z Fv := i 3 6 Pen X Y Vertical Force (MN): i, ( Z 5 ) i, ( Z 7 ) i, ( Z 9 ) i Time (s) Horizontal Force (MN): F h Z Fh := i i, ( Z 5 ) i, ( Z 7 ) i, ( Z 9 ) i 3 4 X (m) Total Force (MN): Ft := i ( Fv i ) + Fh i.5 Fig. 3 - Vertical and Total Force vs. Time Force (MN) 3 6.5 5 87.5 5.5 75 37.5 3 6 time (s) Total Force Vertical Force Stress (MPa) stress in st mode: ( ) i Z 3 i sig := Z 5 i Fig 4. Bending Stress vs Time MPa 4 3 6 Time(s) σf

sii_d_h.mcd Acceleration Functions Ax( x, vx, f, z, cr) F h ( xf,, z, cr) kx Mx x cx Mx vx := Bow Surge Mx Ay( y, vy, f) := ky y + My kf ( f My cy My vy Bow Heave Af( x, y, f, z, cr) := kf ( f Mf + F v ( xf,, z, cr) Mf Bending Calculate Accelerations at Bow AX := Ax Z i i, ( Z ) i, ( Z 5 ) i, ( Z 7 ) i, ( Z 9 ) i ( ) i, ( Z 4 ) i, ( Z 5 ) i ( ) i, ( Z 3 ) i, ( Z 5 ) i, ( Z 7 ) i, ( Z 9 ) i AY := Ay Z 3 i AF := Af Z i Acceleration (m/s).3.5.38.5.63.75.88 3 6 time (s) X -Accel Acceleration (m/s).5.5.5.5 3 6 time (s) Y -Accel Acceleration (m/s).5.5.5.5 5 time (s) F -Accel BM i FVmax = 4.95 FTmax = 36.658 Xmax = 34.335 Ymax.778 Xmax := max Z Ymax := max Z 5 Zmax := max Z 7 Penmax := max Z 9 = Zmax = 9.8 4 Penmax =.46 + le AXmax := max( ( max( AX) min( AX) )) AYmax := max( ( max( AY) min( AY) )) AFmax := max( ( max( AF) min( AF) )) AXmax =.83 AYmax =.747 AFmax =.94 BMmax := := sig Sm imax = 3 i FVmax := max( Fv) FTmax := max( Ft) max( BM) BMmax =. 4

sii_d_h.mcd 3 assemble( FV, FT, X, Y, Z, AY, AF, pen, BM, dt, Ft) := U FV U FT U X.4.964 9.437 U Y 3 U Z 4 3 4 5 8.79 3.493 44.3 U pen 5 Ft = 6 7 58.94 74.78 U AY 6 U AF 7 8 9 9.7 7.9.537 U BM 8 U dt 9 3 36.45 47.74 56.5 for i.. rows( Ft) + 9 U Ft i i 4 5 6.498 65.753 U res := assemble( FVmax, FTmax, Xmax, Ymax, Zmax, AYmax, AFmax, Penmax, BMmax, dt, Ft) res = 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 4 5 4.95 36.658 34.335.778 9.8-4.46.747.94. 4.94.4.964 9.437 8.79 3.493 44.3 FVmax = 4.95 Fvmax Ftmax Xmax Ymax Zmax Penmax Aymax Afmax Bmmax dt Ft INP 3 4.7 5.46.73674.8 37 5.3 35 3. 3...8 LBP B T CB CWP Disp vship alf gam Hice Dice Po ex sigf

sii_d_h.mcd 4 pen := Z 9 i i le + +. Ar := i tan alf pen i Confirmation that Force/Area follows P/A relationship pr := i Fv i Ar i 8 pressure [MPa] pr i 6 4 4 6 8 Ar i Area [m^]