Traffic Impact Analysis Shotwell Road Residential Clayton, NC

Similar documents
CITY OF KIRKLAND TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS GUIDELINES

Calipatria Solar Farm TIA

Traffic Impact Study for the TAVA Homes Project at 1584 East Santa Clara Avenue in the City of Santa Ana

HILLTOP SENIOR LIVING CENTER Pollard Station Traffic Impact Analysis

APPENDIX D. Traffic Impact Analysis

Traffic Impact Study for the Girard Winery Project

ENHANCED PARKWAY STUDY: PHASE 3 REFINED MLT INTERSECTION ANALYSIS

195 Hegenberger Road Hotel: Traffic Circulation Analysis in Response to Comments on the Final EIR

Traffic Impact Analysis

SIMULATION AND ANALYSIS OF ARTERIAL TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ALONG THE US 61 CORRIDOR IN BURLINGTON, IOWA FINAL REPORT

APPENDIX E TRANSPORTATION

Prepared for: Rocklin. Prepared by:

Final Report. Interstate-680 Bus-on-Shoulder Feasibility Assessment. prepared for

Traffic Impact Study for the Grove Street Subdivision

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. MIDWAY SOLAR FARM II County of Imperial, California January 11, 2011

Addendum: Final Design Noise Analysis Study Noise Sensitive Area (NSA) 11 Post March 15, 2016 Open House Response to Comments

Appendix D. Transportation Study

STUDY REPORT #1 ADDENDUM

ROADWAY LIGHTING CURFEW

Rutgers Interactive Lane Closure Application (RILCA) for Work Zone Planning User Manual. New Jersey Highway Authority. Garden State Parkway

Treating Potential Back- of-queue Safety. Developed By:

An Analysis of TDM Impacts on a Corridor Segment Research Findings

VARIATIONS IN CAPACITY AND DELAY ESTIMATES FROM MICROSCOPIC TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODELS

TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY INFORMATION

ESTIMATING PARAMETERS FOR MODIFIED GREENSHIELD S MODEL AT FREEWAY SECTIONS FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS

Bluetooth Travel Time Technology Evaluation Using the BlueTOAD TM

TRACY HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN RECIRCULATED DRAFT SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VOLUME III OCTOBER 2015

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia East Capitol Street at Southern Avenue NE

SITE DESCRIPTION. Vicinity

CASE 1 TWO LANE TO FOUR LANE DIVIDED TRANSITION GEO-610-C NOT TO SCALE GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE FOR MATCH LINE LINE MATCH. 2 (0.6m) shoulder transition

Rural Expressway Intersection Characteristics that Contribute to Reduced Safety Performance

Northwest Needs Improvements Survey

Site 17 W3-160 KEY: District Department of Transportation 55 M Street, SE, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20003

Appendix A Air Quality Construction Emissions Calculations

National Roundabout Conference 2005 DRAFT High-Capacity Roundabout Intersection Analysis: Going Around in Circles David Stanek, PE & Ronald T. Milam,

PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE BOOYSENDAL SOUTH EVEREST MINE

Travel Demand Modeling and Project Coding Procedures

Synchro Studio 9. with Warrants and TripGen 2014 Getting Started and What s New in Version 9

Managing DC Work Zones via a Citywide Transportation Management Plan. ITE Mid-Colonial District Annual Meeting May 20, 2014

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description G Planned Connecticut Avenue Northbound at Military Road Northwest

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description A Proposed I-395 Southwest after Exit 4, Eastbound

A parabolic curve that is applied to make a smooth and safe transition between two grades on a roadway or a highway.

Using Empirical (real-world) Transportation Data to Extend Travel Demand Model Capabilities

Council of State Governments. Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing. October 28, 2013

Utilization of TSMO Practices in Highway Construction Work Zones: A Case Study

Bellevue s Traffic Adaptive Signals

research report Evaluation of Driver Reactions for Effective Use of Dynamic Message Signs in Richmond, Virginia

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia DC Miles South of Pennsylvania Avenue SE

M50 Demand Management Study

Synchro Studio 10. with Warrants Release Notes

S-03-SegB: South Federal Way to Fife LRT

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description A Proposed 6100 Block Georgia Avenue Northwest Southbound

An Analysis of TDM Impacts on a Corridor Segment

ROARING BROOK COMMUNITY INFORMATIONAL MEETING TACONIC STATE PARKWAY (TSP) AT PUDDING STREET INTERCHANGE

Cedar Rapids ITS Deployment Project

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description D Proposed 1900 Block Foxhall Road Northwest Southbound

Northern Virginia Transportation Authority

MEMORANDUM. Church of the Redeemer School Focused Transportation Impact Analysis

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description C Existing 3500 Block Massachusetts Avenue Northwest Eastbound

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 1100 Block 4th Street NE

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description B Planned Branch Avenue Northbound at Alabama Avenue Southeast

Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO

Real-time Adaptive Control System. Technical White Paper. September 2012 Trafficware SynchroGreen Technical White Paper

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia Inside Southern part of 3rd Street Tunnel

The Blue Line Extension

An Assessment of Congestion in the Kansas City Region using the MARC Travel Demand Model

Veirs Mill Road Metrobus Improvements Request to Conduct Public Hearing

Appendix D Supportive Transportation Materials

OR 217,I-5 Experience Portland, OR

APPENDIX I Traffic Impact Analysis

Microscopic Simulation Model Calibration and Validation: A Case Study of VISSIM for a Coordinated Actuated Signal System

OPTIMAL MERGE LAYOUT ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE M50: A MICROSIMULATION MODELLING APPROACH

Request Conditional Use Permit (Colleges & Universities, public or private) Staff Planner Ashby Moss

Travel Time Estimation Using Bluetooth

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2017 TRANSPORTATION SUMMIT INFORMATION ITEM

Pensacola SunGuide Center Monthly ITS Performance Report to Pensacola RTMC Monthly Report July 2016

King County Ombudsman Whistle-Blowers Office Complaint

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description G Proposed 2900 Block Military Road Northwest Eastbound

Updating NTCIP 1202 (Actuated Signal Controllers) to Support a Connected Vehicle Environment. Authors

SAFETY ON THE IH 35 EXPANSION PROJECTS. Andy Petter, P.E. - Waco District

Downtown Boise Multimodal Center

Page 2D-12 Revised the following language in the last sentence on the page from; as shown in Figure 2D-3. To; as shown in Chapter 2H, Figure 2H-35.

Municipal Service Park 3 December Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex

ITS Canada Annual Conference and General Meeting. May 2013

Synchro Studio 10. with Warrants and TripGen Release Notes

CORSIM User's Guide. Version 6.0

vision42

County of Loudoun. Department of Planning and Zoning MEMORANDUM

Activity-Based Human Mobility Patterns Inferred from Mobile Phone Data: A Case Study of Singapore

Incident Location Tool 4.X. User s Manual

1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED

Applying Analysis Tools in Planning for Operations

GORE BUILDING. 238 N. Massachusetts Avenue, Lakeland, FL 33801

ARTS DISTRICT 2018 E. 8 TH STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA

SPEED SURVEY ANALYSIS SYSTEM

Gaston County GIS. Interactive Mapping Website

Traffic Simulator. Revised Software Requirements Specification. Khalid AlHokail Luke Bay James Grady Michael Murphy

TURNING MOVEMENT CALCULATOR VERSION 3.0

Performance Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Methods for Traffic Data Collection. Kamal Banger, Ministry of Transportation of Ontario

Creating transportation system intelligence using PeMS. Pravin Varaiya PeMS Development Group

Transcription:

Shotwell Road Residential Clayton, NC

TABLE O CONTENTS 1. INTROUCTION...1 1.1. Site Location and Study Area...1 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access...2 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses...2 1.4. Existing Roadways...2 2. EXISTING (2017) PEAK HOUR CONITIONS...7 2.1. Existing (2017) Peak Hour Traffic...7 2.2. Analysis of Existing (2017) Peak Hour Traffic...7 3. BACKGROUN (2019) PEAK HOUR CONITIONS...9 3.1. Ambient Traffic Growth...9 3.2. Adjacent evelopment Traffic...9 3.3. uture Roadway Improvements...10 3.4. Background (2019) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...10 3.5. Analysis of Background (2019) Peak Hour Traffic...10 4. SITE TRIP GENERATION AN ISTRIBUTION...14 4.1. Trip Generation...14 4.2. Site Trip istribution and Assignment...14 5. COMBINE (2019) TRAIC CONITIONS...19 5.1. Combined (2019) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes...19 5.2. Analysis of Combined (2019) Peak Hour Traffic...19 6. TRAIC ANALYSIS PROCEURE...22 6.1. Adjustments to Analysis Guidelines...22 7. CAPACITY ANALYSIS...23 7.1. US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road...23 7.2. US Highway 70 Business and Enterprise rive...25 7.3. Shotwell Road and Cameron Way / Stallings Mill Site rive...26 7.4. Shotwell Road and Old US Highway 70...28 7.5. Shotwell Road and Executive rive...30 8. CONCLUSIONS...31 9. RECOMMENATIONS...33 i

LIST O IGURES igure 1 Site Location Map... 4 igure 2 Preliminary Site Plan... 5 igure 3 Existing Lane Configurations... 6 igure 4 Existing (2017) Peak Hour Traffic... 8 igure 5 Projected (2019) Peak Hour Traffic... 11 igure 6 Adjacent evelopment Trips... 12 igure 7 Background (2019) Peak Hour Traffic... 13 igure 8a Site Trip istribution... 15 igure 8b Alternate Scenario Site Trip istribution... 16 igure 9a Site Trip Assignment... 17 igure 9b Alternate Scenario Site Trip Assignment... 18 igure 10a Combined (2019) Peak Hour Traffic... 20 igure 10b Alternate Scenario Combined (2019) Peak Hour Traffic... 21 igure 11 Recommended Lane Configurations... 34 LIST O TABLES Table 1: Trip Generation Summary...14 Table 2: Highway Capacity Manual Levels-of-Service and elay...22 Table 3: Analysis Summary of US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road...23 Table 4: Analysis Summary of US Highway 70 Business and Enterprise rive...25 Table 5: Analysis Summary of Shotwell Road and Cameron Way / Stallings Mill Site rive..26 Table 6: Analysis Summary of Shotwell Road and Old US Highway 70...28 Table 7: Analysis Summary of Shotwell Road and Executive rive...30 ii

TECHNICAL APPENIX Appendix A: Traffic Counts Appendix B: Signal Plans Appendix C: Adjacent evelopment Information Appendix : uture Roadway Improvements Appendix E: Capacity Calculations US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road Appendix : Capacity Calculations US Highway 70 Business and Enterprise rive Appendix G: Capacity Calculations Shotwell Road and Cameron Way Appendix H: Capacity Calculations Shotwell Road and Old US Highway 70 Appendix I: Capacity Calculations Shotwell Road and Executive rive iii

TRAIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHOTWELL ROA RESIENTIAL CLAYTON, NORTH CAROLINA 1. INTROUCTION The contents of this report present the findings of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted for the proposed residential development located northeast of the intersection of US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road in Clayton, North Carolina. The purpose of this study is to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding transportation system created by traffic generated by the proposed development, as well as recommend improvements to mitigate the impacts. The proposed development, anticipated to be completed in 2019, is assumed to consist of 152 townhomes. The study analyzes traffic conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours for the following scenarios: Existing (2017) Traffic Background (2019) Traffic Combined (2019) Traffic Alternate Scenario Combined (2019) Traffic with cross connection to Atkinson Street 1.1. Site Location and Study Area The development is proposed to be located east of Shotwell Road and north of US Highway 70 Business in Clayton, North Carolina. Refer to igure 1 for the site location map. The study area for the TIA was determined through coordination with the North Carolina epartment of Transportation (NCOT) and the Town of Clayton (Town) and consists of the following existing intersections:

US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road US Highway 70 Business and Enterprise rive Shotwell Road and Cameron Way Shotwell Road and Old US Highway 70 Shotwell Road and Executive rive 1.2. Proposed Land Use and Site Access The proposed development, anticipated to be completed in 2019, is assumed to consist of 152 townhomes. Site access is proposed via a connection to the existing Enterprise rive and a connection to the existing Cameron Way. As part of the development of this property, a multi-party land swap will be executed to extend Enterprise rive north to directly connect with Cameron Way. The current connection alignment will be removed. The site plan allows for a future connection to the north of the site, if the northern parcel of land develops. An alternate scenario, dependent on the approval of the right-of-way, would allow for an additional connection to the east of the site via the extension of Atkinson Street. Refer to igure 2 for a copy of the preliminary site plan. 1.3. Adjacent Land Uses The proposed development is located in an area consisting primarily of residential development with some retail and industrial development. 1.4. Existing Roadways US Highway 70 Business is a six-lane roadway running in an east-west direction with a posted speed limit of 45 miles per hour (mph) within the study area. Based on the most recent data (2015) from the NCOT, US Highway 70 Business had an average annual daily traffic (AAT) volume of approximately 39,000 vehicles per day (vpd) west of its intersection with Shotwell Road. 2

Shotwell Road is a two-lane roadway running in a north-south direction with a posted speed limit of 45 mph north of its intersection with US Highway 70 Business and a posted speed limit of 35 mph south of its intersection with US Highway 70 Business. Based on the most recent data (2014) from the NCOT, Shotwell Road had an average AAT volume of approximately 11,000 vpd north of its intersection with US Highway 70 Business. Enterprise rive is a two-lane roadway running in a north-south direction with no posted speed limit within the study area. or the purpose of this study a speed limit of 25 mph was assumed. Based on the traffic counts from 2017, and assuming that the PM peak hour volume is roughly 10% of the average daily traffic, Enterprise rive has an AAT volume of approximately 2,900 vpd north of its intersection with US Highway 70 Business. Cameron Way is a two-lane roadway running in an east-west direction with no posted speed limit within the study area. or the purpose of this study, a speed limit of 25 mph was assumed. Based on the traffic counts from 2017, and assuming that the PM peak hour volume is roughly 10% of the average daily traffic, Cameron Way has an AAT volume of approximately 1,400 vpd east of its intersection with Shotwell Road. Old US Highway 70 is a two-lane roadway running in an east-west direction with a posted speed limit of 45 mph within the study area. Based on the most recent data (2015) from the NCOT, Old US Highway 70 had an AAT volume of approximately 5,300 vpd east of its intersection with Shotwell Road. Executive rive is a two-lane roadway running in an east-west direction with no posted speed limit within the study area. or the purpose of this study, a speed limit of 25 mph was assumed. Based on the traffic counts from 2017, and assuming that the PM peak hour volume is roughly 10% of the average daily traffic, Executive rive has an AAT volume of approximately 740 vpd east of its intersection with Shotwell Road. Existing lane configurations (number of traffic lanes on each intersection approach), lane widths, storage capacities, and other intersection and roadway information were collected through field reconnaissance by Ramey Kemp & Associates, Inc. (RKA). Refer to igure 3 for an illustration of the existing lane configurations within the study area. 3

Old US Highway 70 US Highway 70 Business Shotwell Road PROPOSE SITE N LEGEN Proposed Site Location Study Intersection Study Area Shotwell Road Residential Clayton, NC Site Location Map Scale: Not to Scale igure 1 4

2. EXISTING (2017) PEAK HOUR CONITIONS 2.1. Existing (2017) Peak Hour Traffic Existing peak hour traffic volumes were determined based on traffic counts conducted at the study intersections listed below, in May of 2017 by RKA during the typical weekday AM (7:00 AM 9:00 AM) and PM (4:00 PM 6:00 PM) peak periods: US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road US Highway 70 Business and Enterprise rive Shotwell Road and Cameron Way Shotwell Road and Old US Highway 70 Shotwell Road and Executive rive Traffic volumes were balanced between study intersections, where appropriate. Refer to igure 4 for existing (2017) weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. A copy of the count data is located in Appendix A of this report. 2.2. Analysis of Existing (2017) Peak Hour Traffic The existing (2017) weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were analyzed to determine the current levels of service at the study intersections under existing roadway conditions. Signal information was obtained from NCOT and is included in Appendix B. The results of the analysis are presented in Section 7 of this report. 7

3. BACKGROUN (2019) PEAK HOUR CONITIONS In order to account for growth of traffic and subsequent traffic conditions at a future year, background traffic projections are needed. Background traffic is the component of traffic due to the growth of the community and surrounding area that is anticipated to occur regardless of whether or not the proposed development is constructed. Background traffic is comprised of existing traffic growth within the study area and additional traffic created as a result of adjacent approved developments. 3.1. Ambient Traffic Growth Through coordination with the Town and NCOT, it was determined that an annual growth rate of 3% would be used to generate projected (2019) weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes. Refer to igure 5 for projected (2019) peak hour traffic. 3.2. Adjacent evelopment Traffic Through coordination with the Town and NCOT, Stallings Mill Apartments, Creech Subdivision, and a Mexican restaurant were identified to be included as adjacent developments in this study. Stallings Mill Apartments is located west of Shotwell Road, with a site drive proposed as the eastbound approach at the intersection of Shotwell Road and Cameron Way and is expected to be fully-built out by 2019 and consist of approximately 288 apartment units. It should be noted that part of the development was constructed and operational at the time of data collection; however, it was decided to include the total trips in order to maintain conservative results of this study. Creech Subdivision is located southeast of the intersection of Shotwell Road and Covered Bridge Road in Clayton, North Carolina. A revised TIA was completed by Morton and Morton esign Services in July 2015. According to this TIA, the Creech Subdivision will consist of 180 single-family homes with a build-out year of 2021. Site Traffic from this development was distributed through the study area according to the approved trip generation and trip distribution from the Creech Subdivision TIA. 9

The Mexican restaurant is to be located in the southeast quadrant of Shotwell Road and Cameron Way. A TIA was not completed for this development; therefore, RKA calculated the approximate traffic impact of the restaurant through coordination with the Town. Refer to Appendix C for the calculations. Adjacent development trips are shown in igure 6. Adjacent development information can be found in Appendix C. 3.3. uture Roadway Improvements Based on coordination with the NCOT and the Town, the median safety project along US Highway 70 Business and the addition of a northbound left-turn lane at the intersection of Shotwell Road and US Highway 70 Business by the Pine Hollow development will be included as future roadway improvements. The median safety project is expected to increase the westbound left-turn storage length at the intersection of US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road. A preliminary concept for these improvements was provided by NCOT and can be found in Appendix. 3.4. Background (2019) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The background (2019) traffic volumes were determined by projecting the existing (2017) peak hour traffic to the year 2019, and adding the adjacent development trips. Refer to igure 7 for an illustration of the background (2019) peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. 3.5. Analysis of Background (2019) Peak Hour Traffic The background (2019) AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections were analyzed with future geometric roadway conditions and traffic control. The analysis results are presented in Section 7 of this report. 10

4. SITE TRIP GENERATION AN ISTRIBUTION 4.1. Trip Generation The proposed development is assumed to consist of 152 townhomes. Average weekday daily, AM peak hour, and PM peak hour trips for the proposed development were estimated using methodology contained within the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. Table 1 provides a summary of the trip generation potential for the site. Land Use (ITE Code) Residential Condo / Townhouse (230) Table 1: Trip Generation Summary Intensity 152 dwelling units aily Traffic (vpd) AM Peak Hour Trips (vph) PM Peak Hour Trips (vph) Enter Exit Enter Exit 890 11 56 53 26 It is estimated that the proposed development will generate approximately 890 total site trips on the roadway network during a typical 24-hour weekday period. Of the daily traffic volume, it is anticipated that 67 trips (11 entering and 56 exiting) will occur during the AM peak hour and 79 (53 entering and 26 exiting) will occur during the PM peak hour. 4.2. Site Trip istribution and Assignment Trip distribution percentages used in assigning site traffic for this development were estimated based on a combination of existing traffic patterns, population centers adjacent to the study area, and engineering judgment. It is estimated that trips will be distributed as follows: 45% to/from the west via US Highway 70 Business 25% to/from the east via US Highway 70 Business 15% to/from the west via Old US Highway 70 5% to/from the east via Old US Highway 70 5% to/from the north via Shotwell Road 5% to/from the south via Shotwell Road The site trip distribution is shown in igure 8a. Refer to igure 9a for the site trip assignment. The alternate scenario site trip distribution is shown in igure 8b. Refer to igure 9b for the alternate scenario site trip assignment. 14

5. COMBINE (2019) TRAIC CONITIONS 5.1. Combined (2019) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes To estimate traffic conditions with the site fully built-out, the total site trips were added to the background (2019) traffic volumes to determine the combined (2019) traffic volumes. Refer to igure 10a for an illustration of the combined (2019) peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed site fully developed and igure 10b for an illustration of the alternate scenario combined (2019) peak hour traffic volumes with the proposed site fully developed. 5.2. Analysis of Combined (2019) Peak Hour Traffic Study intersections were analyzed with the combined (2019) traffic volumes using the same methodology previously discussed for existing and background traffic conditions. Intersections were analyzed with improvements necessary to accommodate future traffic volumes. The results of the capacity analysis for each intersection are presented in Section 7 of this report. 19

6. TRAIC ANALYSIS PROCEURE Study intersections were analyzed using the methodology outlined in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) published by the Transportation Research Board. Capacity and level of service are the design criteria for this traffic study. A computer software package, Synchro (Version 9.1), was used to complete the analyses for most of the study area intersections. Please note that the unsignalized capacity analysis does not provide an overall level of service for an intersection; only delay for an approach with a conflicting movement. The HCM defines capacity as the maximum hourly rate at which persons or vehicles can reasonably be expected to traverse a point or uniform section of a lane or roadway during a given time period under prevailing roadway, traffic, and control conditions. Level of service (LOS) is a term used to represent different driving conditions, and is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by motorists and/or passengers. Level of service varies from Level A representing free flow, to Level where breakdown conditions are evident. Refer to Table 2 for HCM levels of service and related average control delay per vehicle for both signalized and unsignalized intersections. Control delay as defined by the HCM includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. An average control delay of 50 seconds at a signalized intersection results in LOS operation at the intersection. Table 2: Highway Capacity Manual Levels-of-Service and elay UNSIGNALIZE INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL LEVEL O ELAY PER VEHICLE SERVICE (SECONS) A B C E 0-10 10-15 15-25 25-35 35-50 >50 LEVEL O SERVICE A B C E SIGNALIZE INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL ELAY PER VEHICLE (SECONS) 0-10 10-20 20-35 35-55 55-80 >80 6.1. Adjustments to Analysis Guidelines Capacity analysis at all study intersections was completed according to the Town s LO and NCOT Congestion Management Guidelines. 22

7. CAPACITY ANALYSIS 7.1. US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road The existing signalized intersection of US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road was analyzed under existing (2017), background (2019), combined (2019), and alternate scenario combined (2019) traffic conditions with the lane configurations and traffic control shown in Table 3. Refer to Table 3 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix E for the Synchro capacity analysis reports. ANALYSIS SCENARIO Existing (2017) Background (2019) Combined (2019) Alternate Scenario Combined (2019) Table 3: Analysis Summary of US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road A P P R O A C H EB NB EB NB EB NB EB NB LANE CONIGURATIONS 1 LT, 2 TH, 1 RT 1 LT, 3 TH, 1 RT 1 LT, 2 TH, 1 RT 1 LT, 3 TH, 1 RT 2 LT, 1 TH-RT 1 LT, 2 TH, 1 RT 1 LT, 3 TH, 1 RT 2 LT, 1 TH-RT 1 LT, 2 TH, 1 RT 1 LT, 3 TH, 1 RT 2 LT, 1 TH-RT WEEKAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach C C C C Overall (seconds) (46) E (62) E (67) E (63) Improvements to lane configurations by the Pine Hollow development are shown in bold. WEEKAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach E Overall (seconds) E (76) (120) (126) (124) Capacity analysis of existing (2017) traffic conditions indicates the intersection of US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road is expected to operate at an overall LOS during the weekday AM peak hour and LOS E during the weekday PM peak hour. Under background (2019), combined (2019), and alternate scenario combined (2019) traffic conditions, the intersection is expected to operate at an overall LOS E during the weekday AM peak hour and overall LOS during the weekday PM peak hour. 23

It should be noted that the overall delay at the intersection is expected to increase by only five (5) seconds between background and combined traffic conditions during the weekday AM peak hour and six (6) seconds of delay during the weekday PM peak hour. Under the alternate scenario, the overall delay is expected to increase by one (1) second between background and combined traffic conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The traffic generated by the proposed development is anticipated to account for 1% of the overall traffic at this intersection. Although not recommended as part of this development, the overall delay at the intersection may be reduced by increasing the split time for the southbound approach. 24

7.2. US Highway 70 Business and Enterprise rive The existing unsignalized intersection of US Highway 70 Business and Enterprise rive was analyzed under existing (2017), background (2019), combined (2019), and alternate scenario combined (2019) traffic conditions with the lane configurations and traffic control shown in Table 4. Refer to Table 4 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix for the Synchro capacity analysis reports. Table 4: Analysis Summary of US Highway 70 Business and Enterprise rive ANALYSIS SCENARIO Existing (2017) Background (2019) Combined (2019) Alternate Scenario Combined (2019) A P P R O A C H EB EB EB EB LANE CONIGURATIONS 3 TH 3 TH, 1 RT 1 RT 3 TH 3 TH, 1 RT 1 RT 3 TH 3 TH, 1 RT 1 RT 3 TH 3 TH, 1 RT 1 RT 1. Level of service for minor-street approach. WEEKAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach 1 1 1 1 Overall (seconds) WEEKAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach C 1 C 1 C 1 C 1 Overall (seconds) Capacity analysis of existing (2017), background (2019), combined (2019), and alternate scenario combined (2019) traffic conditions indicates the southbound minor-street approach is expected to operate at LOS during the weekday AM peak hour and LOS C during the weekday PM peak hour with delays typical for a minor approach of a heavily traveled mainline. rom background (2019) to combined (2019) conditions, during the weekday AM peak hour, the delay for the southbound approach increases by approximately 20 seconds and the queue increases by one vehicle. 25

7.3. Shotwell Road and Cameron Way / Stallings Mill Site rive The existing unsignalized intersection of Shotwell Road and Cameron Way / Stallings Mill Site rive was analyzed under existing (2017), background (2019), combined (2019), and alternate scenario combined (2019) traffic conditions with the lane configurations and traffic control shown in Table 5. Refer to Table 5 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix G for the Synchro capacity analysis reports. Table 5: Analysis Summary of Shotwell Road and Cameron Way / Stallings Mill Site rive ANALYSIS SCENARIO Existing (2017) Background (2019) Combined (2019) Alternate Scenario Combined (2019) Combined (2019) with Improvements A P P R O A C H EB NB EB NB EB NB EB NB EB NB LANE CONIGURATIONS 1 LT-TH-RT 1 LT-TH-RT 1 LT-TH-RT 1 LT-TH-RT 1. Level of service for major-street left-turn movement. 2. Level of service for minor-street approach. Striping improvements by developer denoted in bold. WEEKAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach C 2 C 2 C 2 2 C 2 2 C 2 2 C 2 2 Overall (seconds) WEEKAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach C 2 2 E 2 2 E 2 2 E 2 2 Overall (seconds) Capacity analysis of existing (2017) traffic conditions indicates that all minor-street approaches and major-street left-turn movements are expected to operate at LOS C or better during the weekday AM peak hour and LOS or better during the weekday PM peak hour. Under background (2019), combined (2019), alternate scenario combined (2019), and E 2 2 26

combined (2019) with improvements traffic conditions, the eastbound minor-street approach is expected to operate at LOS C and the westbound minor-street approach is expected to operate at LOS during the weekday AM peak hour. The eastbound minor-street approach is expected to operate at LOS E and the westbound minor-street approach is expected to operate at LOS during the weekday PM peak hour under background (2019), combined (2019), alternate scenario combined (2019), and combined (2019) with improvements traffic conditions. The delay and queuing observed on the westbound approach is due to it being an unsignalized approach at a mainline (Shotwell Road) with heavy through volumes. Striping the Cameron Way approach as one ingress lane and two egress lanes an exclusive left-turn lane and a shared through/right-turn lane may reduce delay and relieve queuing as right-turning vehicles would not be impeded by vehicles waiting to turn left. While the traffic at this intersection meets the peak hour warrant during the weekday PM peak hour from the 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control evices (MUTC), it is unlikely traffic volumes will satisfy the MUTC 8-hour and 4-hour signal warrants, which NCOT favors for the installation of a traffic signal. 27

7.4. Shotwell Road and Old US Highway 70 The existing signalized intersection of Shotwell Road and Old US Highway 70 was analyzed under existing (2017), background (2019), combined (2019), and alternate scenario combined (2019) traffic conditions with the lane configurations and traffic control shown in Table 6. Refer to Table 6 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix H for the Synchro capacity analysis reports. Table 6: Analysis Summary of Shotwell Road and Old US Highway 70 ANALYSIS SCENARIO Existing (2017) Background (2019) Combined (2019) Alternate Scenario Combined (2019) A P P R O A C H EB NB EB NB EB NB EB NB LANE CONIGURATIONS 1 LT, 1 TH, 1 RT 1 LT, 1 TH, 1 RT 1 LT, 1 TH, 1 RT 1 LT, 1 TH, 1 RT WEEKAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach C C C C Overall (seconds) E (57) (88) (88) (88) WEEKAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach C E Overall (seconds) (41) E (56) E (57) E (57) Capacity analysis of existing (2017) traffic conditions indicates the intersection of Old US Highway 70 and Shotwell Road operates at an overall LOS E during the weekday AM peak hour and LOS during the weekday PM peak hour. Under background (2019), combined (2019), and alternate scenario combined (2019) traffic conditions, the intersection is expected to operate at an overall LOS during the weekday AM peak hour and overall LOS E during the weekday PM peak hour. 28

The intersection is not expected to experience an increase in overall delay between background (2019) and combined (2019) traffic conditions during the weekday AM peak hour and is expected to only experience an increase of one (1) second of delay during the weekday PM peak hour. It should be noted that the signal plans provided by NCOT for the analysis indicate that mainline phases 2 and 6 are along Old US Highway 70. However, due to development in the overall area, the northbound and southbound approaches of Shotwell Road carry more peak-hour volume than Old US Highway 70. A field review of signal operations may be beneficial to ensure the northbound and southbound approach phases are receiving adequate time. 29

7.5. Shotwell Road and Executive rive The existing unsignalized intersection of Shotwell Road and Executive rive was analyzed under existing (2017), background (2019), combined (2019), and alternate scenario combined (2019) traffic conditions with the lane configurations and traffic control shown in Table 7. Refer to Table 7 for a summary of the analysis results. Refer to Appendix I for the Synchro capacity analysis reports. Table 7: Analysis Summary of Shotwell Road and Executive rive ANALYSIS SCENARIO Existing (2017) Background (2019) Combined (2019) Alternate Scenario Combined (2019) A P P R O A C H NB NB NB NB LANE CONIGURATIONS 1 RT 1 TH-RT 2 TH 1 RT 1 TH-RT 2 TH 1 RT 1 TH-RT 2 TH 1 RT 1 TH-RT 2 TH 1. Level of service for minor-street approach. WEEKAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach B 1 Overall (seconds) B 1 B 1 B 1 WEEKAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL O SERVICE Approach B 1 Overall (seconds) C 1 C 1 C 1 Capacity analysis results indicate the westbound minor-street approach is expected to operate at acceptable levels-of-service for all analysis scenarios. 30

8. CONCLUSIONS This Traffic Impact Analysis was conducted to determine the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Shotwell Road Residential development, located north of US Highway 70 Business and east of Shotwell Road in Clayton, North Carolina. The proposed development is expected to consist of 152 townhomes and be built out in 2019. Site access is proposed via a connection to the existing Enterprise rive and a connection to the existing Cameron Way. As part of the development of this property, a multi-party land swap will be executed to extend Enterprise rive north to directly connect with Cameron Way. The current connection alignment will be removed. The site plan allows for a future connection to the north of the site, if the northern parcel of land develops. An alternate scenario, dependent on the approval of the right of way, would allow for an additional connection to the east of the site via Atkinson Street. The study analyzes traffic conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours for the following scenarios: Existing (2017) Traffic Background (2019) Traffic Combined (2019) Traffic Alternate Scenario Combined (2019) Traffic Trip Generation It is estimated that the proposed development will generate approximately 890 total site trips on the roadway network during a typical 24-hour weekday period. Of the daily traffic volume, it is anticipated that 67 trips (11 entering and 56 exiting) will occur during the AM peak hour and 79 (53 entering and 26 exiting) will occur during the PM peak hour. Adjustments to Analysis Guidelines Capacity analysis at all study intersections was completed according to the Town s UO and NCOT Congestion Management Guidelines. 31

Capacity Analysis Summary Currently, the signalized intersections in the study area are operating at overall levels-ofservice and E during the AM and PM peak hours. ield review of the traffic along Shotwell Road revealed southbound queueing on Shotwell Road from US Highway 70 Business to north of Cameron Way under existing conditions. ue to this mainline queueing, vehicles on the minor approaches at the unsignalized intersections studied have fewer gaps in which to enter the flow of traffic. Under background (2019) traffic conditions, which include approved future developments in the area, the signalized intersections are anticipated to operate at overall levels-of-service E and during the AM and PM peak hours. The minor approaches to unsignalized intersections are expected to operate at degraded levels-of-service, but this is typical for congested areas. Once built-out, traffic from the proposed site is anticipated to account for approximately 1% or less of the overall traffic at the US Highway 70 Business and Old US Highway 70 intersections with Shotwell Road. Marginal impacts to delays and queue lengths are expected as a result of the development traffic. An alternate access scenario was also analyzed. This scenario accounts to the extension of Atkinson Street from S. Moore Street to the stub-out the development is constructing. This connection will allow traffic within the development and the immediately surrounding area to circumvent the signal at US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road to gain access to either eastbound or westbound US Highway 70 Business. This diversion will decrease the amount of development traffic on Shotwell Road and could help reduce delays and queueing. The construction of the Atkinson Street extension will greatly improve overall connectivity in this area. 32

9. RECOMMENATIONS Based on the findings of this study, specific geometric improvements have been identified and are recommended to accommodate future traffic conditions. See a more detailed description of the recommended improvements below. Refer to igure 11 for an illustration of the recommended lane configurations. Background Improvements by the NCOT Median Safety Project US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road Extend westbound left-turn lane to approximately 350 feet of storage with appropriate taper. Background Improvements by the Pine Hollow evelopment US Highway 70 Business and Shotwell Road Construct an additional northbound left-turn lane with at least 200 feet of storage and appropriate taper. evelop a signal modification plan to accommodate the new lane geometrics. Recommended Improvements by eveloper Shotwell Road and Cameron Way/Stallings Mill Site rive Stripe the westbound approach to accommodate one ingress lane and two egress lanes - a shared through/right turn-lane and an exclusive left-turn lane - with at least 75 feet of storage and appropriate taper. 33