Active and Passive Metrics and Methods (and everything in-between, or Hybrid) draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-03 Al Morton Nov 2015

Similar documents
Advanced Stream and Sampling Framework for IPPM

IPv6, IPv4 and Coexistence Updates for IPPM's Active Metric Framework (Title updated formerly referred to as IPv6 update) draft-ietf-ippm-2330-ipv6-02

Registry for Performance Metrics

Multipoint Alternate Marking method for passive and hybrid performance monitoring

Initial Performance Metric Registry Entries

A packet based method for passive performance monitoring

IP Flow Performance Measurement (IPFPM) Framework

Initial Performance Metric Registry Entries

Delay Variation Applicability Statement

An overview on Internet Measurement Methodologies, Techniques and Tools

IPv6 Specifications to Internet Standard Open Issues. Ole Trøan,

How OAM Identified in Overlay Protocols

Coloring based IP Flow Performance Measurement Framework

TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) Working Group Status. IETF 83 - Paris March 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Turnip Video A. Morton AT&T Labs November 2012

draft-li-intent-classification- 00

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: May 2018

Model-based Measurements Of Network Loss

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track ISSN: February 2016

Autonomic Networking Use Case for Distributed Detection of SLA Violations

IETF94: Access Networks Dormant Middleboxes

Benchmarking Drafts Overview for Members of SDNRG (94th IETF, Yokohama)

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6985 Category: Informational July 2013 ISSN:

Standard Configuration of DiffServ Service Classes at IETF84

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. Juniper Networks May 2017

Benchmarking Methodology for IPv6 Transition Technologies

Compact Alternate Marking

BANANA BOF Charter Review. IETF 99: Prague, Czech Republic Margaret Cullen Brian Trammell

IETF 103. Chairs: Flemming Andreasen Bo Burman

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU START

Security Baseline Data Model for Network Infrastructure Device draft-xia-sacm-nid-dp-security-baseline-00 draft-dong-sacm-nid-cp-security-baseline-00

Performance Metrics and Performance Measurements for Interprovider Connections

Routing. 4. Mar INF-3190: Switching and Routing

Layer 4 TCP Performance in carrier transport networks Throughput is not always equal to bandwidth

Assessing the Nature of Internet traffic: Methods and Pitfalls

IPPM Considerations for the IPv6 PDM Destination Option

Traffic Flow Measurements within IP Networks: Requirements, Technologies and Standardization

Sampling Challenges. Tanja Zseby Competence Center Network Research Fraunhofer Institute FOKUS Berlin. COST TMA September 22, 2008

LARGE SCALE IP ROUTING LECTURE BY SEBASTIAN GRAF

Extending IETF tools for Working Group Draft Tracking. WGDTspec BOF

Service Level Specifications, Cornerstone to E2E QoS across the Internet?

SUSIE - Charging and Accounting for QoS-enhanced IP Multicast

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6673 Category: Standards Track August 2012 ISSN:

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU START

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU START

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY BEFORE YOU START

NETCONF WG. IETF 96 Berlin, Germany WEDNESDAY, July 20, Hours. Mehmet Ersue Mahesh Jethanandani

Transport Service (TAPS) Working Group

CSE 565 Computer Security Fall 2018

In-situ OAM. IPPM November 6 th, 2018

SigMF: The Signal Metadata Format. Ben Hilburn

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational ISSN: August 2014

Use of Ethernet Control Word RECOMMENDED. draft-ietf-pals-ethernet-cw-00 Stewart Bryant, Andy Malis & Ingas Bagdonas IETF 100 November 2017

IETF YANG models for VLAN interface classification. draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang Robert Wilton (Cisco)

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Claise Cisco Systems, Inc. G. Muenz Technische Universitaet Muenchen April 2010

Refresh-interval Independent RSVP-TE FRR draft-chandra-mpls-ri-rsvp-frr-02

Lesson Learned CIP Version 5 Transition Program CIP : Communications and Networking Cyber Assets Draft Version: August 18, 2015

Passive One-Way-Delay Measurements and Data Export

Broadband Quality of Service

BLM6196 COMPUTER NETWORKS AND COMMUNICATION PROTOCOLS

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3134 Category: Informational June 2001

N. Brownlee Independent Submissions Editor Expires: April 21, 2013 October 18, 2012

Edge Classification in Networks

From NetFlow to IPFIX the evolution of IP flow information export

RTP Media Congestion Avoidance Techniques (rmcat)

NAT Internetworking Standards and Technologies, Computer Engineering, KMITL 2

RFC6434-bis IPv6 Node Requirements update

HSCN Quality of Service (QoS) Policy

ACE IETF 100 (Singapore)

An Approach to Flexible QoS Routing with Active Networks

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Obsoletes: A. Morton, Ed. AT&T Labs January 2016

SIP System Features. SIP Timer Values. Rules for Configuring the SIP Timers CHAPTER

IPv6 Flow Label Specification

How Akamai delivers your packets - the insight. Christian Kaufmann SwiNOG #21 11th Nov 2010

Broadband Quality of Service

Shim6: Network Operator Concerns. Jason Schiller Senior Internet Network Engineer IP Core Infrastructure Engineering UUNET / MCI

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: November 2012

Comparision study of MobileIPv4 and MobileIPv6

Independent Submission Request for Comments: 6919 Category: Experimental. RTFM, Inc. 1 April 2013

Operators and the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)

Reliable Multicast in Mobile Networks

Open Performance Testing Protocol OPTP Concepts

3. Quality of Service

Network Scalability Ignas Bagdonas RIPE68 13-MAY-2014

Service Function Chaining Metadata Type 1 and Type 2 draft-sarikaya-sfc-metadatat1t2-01

Lecture 4 Wide Area Networks - Routing

Network Working Group. Advanced Network & Services September 1999

Introduction to IEEE 802.1Qca Path Control and Reservation

Category: Informational NASA Glenn Research Center February 2008

draft-aoun-mgcp-nat-package-02.txt

October 4, 2000 Expires in six months. SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over TLS. Status of this Memo

A closer look at network structure:

A quota system for fair share of network resources

This chapter provides information to configure Cflowd.

Towards An Integrated Classification of Exceptions

SIP System Features. SIP Timer Values. Rules for Configuring the SIP Timers CHAPTER

ICE IETF#96. draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis. Berlin, Germany. Christer Holmberg

Domain Based Metering

ETSF05/ETSF10 Internet Protocols. Performance & QoS Congestion Control

SDN RG State of the Nation. Daniel King Kohei Shiomoto IETF 95 Buenos Aires

Transcription:

Active and Passive Metrics and Methods (and everything in-between, or Hybrid) draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive-03 Al Morton Nov 2015 1

Definitions First, define Performance Metric and Method of Measurement. Next, define Active and Passive Methods Then, recognize that IPPM s Active Metrics deliberately incorporate some methods in the Metric Definition therefore, Active Metrics. Hybrid Methods are a combination of Active and Passive attributes Multiple categories of Hybrid, Type I, Type II, and the already-named Spatial Metrics, RFC 5644 2

Reviews, Comments, Support Brian - add more complete defs. for Hybrid Joachim and Tal - Many refinements to definitions from examining examples. Greg, Joachim, and Mike examined circumstances under which a Hybrid Method could be expected to produce results comparable to Passive (end of 3.8) Joachim clarifications for 2D Figure in section 4.1 Tal suggested examination of Y.1731 methods (4.4) Nalini and Tiziano support and additional comments. 3

Status Three updates since last IPPM session Version 01 addressed comments at IETF-93 WGLC generated solid reviews and support Version 02 addressed comments up to the draft deadline, Oct 19th One line of examination continued through the end of WGLC, Oct 21 st (and beyond) Agreed wording incorporated in Version 03 4

BACKUP 5

Revised -00 classification: 2 Dimensions 1. The degree to which the stream of interest effects overall network conditions experienced by that stream and other streams. This is a key dimension for Active measurement error analysis. 2. The degree to which stream characteristics are known a' priori. There are methodological advantages of knowing the source stream characteristics, and having complete control of the stream characteristics. number of packets when sent what kind This is a key dimension for Passive measurement error analysis. Section 4.1 ends with a paragraph of examples for error associated with each type of method. 6

draft-zheng-ippm-framework-passive-03 * cites metrics of throughput, latency, and errors as active, (sec 4.1) >>> These metrics can be measured using many methods * uses the phrase "existing traffic" when describing passive measurements, and "existing on the network" when referring to passive metrics (sec 4.2) >>> Consistent with IPPM Wg draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive definitions. * indicates that definition of Hybrid is a combination of active and passive >>> also consistent with draft-ietf-ippm-active-passive definitions (sec 6, Methodology for "IP Passive Performance Measurements" from title) BUT cites inserting Y.1731 OAM along with "altering the packet" >>> Neither of these are "existing traffic" >>> Do detailed methods belong in the framework? 7

We* didn t start the fire IPPM chartered since 1997, working as part of BMWG before that RTFM and IPFIX long-timers First PAM conference in 2000 Many terms are in common use in IETF, but *some* lack formal definitions The notions of active and passive are wellestablished, so let s document them. Further, let s help classify new methods according to useful criteria * we is likely everyone sitting in the session, except Matt Mathis, Bill Cerveny, and Nevil Brownlee. Al here since 98. 8

Words and Meaning Words can only have strong meaning within a Context (part of the definition) We need definitions in Standards Work: Communicate Effectively Avoid Ambiguity Start with Fundamental terms and build from there 9

On to classification: 2 Dimensions Affect of the measurement stream on network conditions ^ Max * Active using max capacity stream * Active using stream with load of typical user * Active using extremely sparse, randomized stream * PDM Passive Min * +---------------------------------------------------------------- Stream None Characteristics completely known 10

More Dimensions of Categorization Decompose effect on network conditions to Effect on the measured stream (itself) Effect on unmeasured flows that share the path Effect on network state or adaptation (features in net under test have influence) 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Act- max capacity Act-typ user Cellular Active-sparse Observe+Load Effect on Stream itself Other flows Network Reaction 11

Two Classifications discussed PDM Method may have small affect on measured stream Measured stream has unknown characteristics until observed/processed to add PDM header Coloring Method may have small affect on measured stream (possibly less than PDM) Measured stream has unknown characteristics until observed/processed to color the header 12