Who we tested [Eight] participants, having the following profile characteristics, evaluated [product name].

Similar documents
Usability Testing Methodology for the 2017 Economic Census Web Instrument

Usability Test Plan for Blogger Mobile Application

User Testing Study: Collaborizm.com. Jessica Espejel, Megan Koontz, Lauren Restivo. LIS 644: Usability Theory and Practice

USABILITY REPORT A REPORT OF USABILITY FINDINGS FOR OFF THE BEATEN PATH WEBSITE

Stream Features Application Usability Test Report

Usability and Evaluation of BCKOnline PORTAL Prototype Early breast cancer Recurrent Advanced

Table of Contents. I) Project Planning. User Analysis. III) Tasks Analysis. IV) Storyboard. V) Function Design. VI) Scenario Design.

Consumers Energy Usability Testing Report

Visual Appeal vs. Usability: Which One Influences User Perceptions of a Website More?

IBM MANY EYES USABILITY STUDY

Table of Contents Extension Risk Management Education 10/4/2017 2

Usability Report for Love and Robots.com

Product Development for Medical, Life Sciences, and Consumer Health

Usability evaluation in practice: the OHIM Case Study

Delivery guide: SAGE Video

Usability Services at the University of Maryland: Who, What and How

Usability Report. Author: Stephen Varnado Version: 1.0 Date: November 24, 2014

Usability Testing. November 9, 2016

Web Evaluation Report Guidelines

PNC.com, Weather.com & SouthWest.com. Usability Analysis. Tyler A. Steinke May 8, 2014 IMS 413

Eyetracking Study: Kent State University Library. Janie Ralston

Folsom Library & RensSearch Usability Test Plan

Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio

A Comparative Usability Test. Orbitz.com vs. Hipmunk.com

Disrupting the Personal Lives

VIDEO 1: WHY IS THE USER EXPERIENCE CRITICAL TO CONTEXTUAL MARKETING?

itunes Usability Report SUNNY FAGALDE CONCEPTS & PRACTICES IN USABILITY TESTING

Usability Testing Methods An Overview

Usability Study: The Key Ingredient in Designing Effective Help Systems

CHAPTER 4 HUMAN FACTOR BASED USER INTERFACE DESIGN

Foundation Level Syllabus Usability Tester Sample Exam

USER RESEARCH Website portfolio prototype

Usability Testing Report of College of Liberal Arts & Sciences (CLAS) Website

Concepts of Usability. Usability Testing. Usability concept ISO/IS What is context? What is context? What is usability? How to measure it?

Calisphere UI Testing Findings and Recommendations

ProMenPol Database Description

Usability Test Report of ClinNext 10 EHR version 1.0

Report on the usability test of [name]

Amazon Webstore Usability Test

Human-Computer Interaction IS4300

IBM s approach. Ease of Use. Total user experience. UCD Principles - IBM. What is the distinction between ease of use and UCD? Total User Experience

Improving Government Websites and Surveys with Usability Testing

NANOS SURVEY NANOS SURVEY

Core Technology Development Team Meeting

Table of contents. TOOLKIT for Making Written Material Clear and Effective

User-centered design in technical communication

Dataverse Usability Evaluation: Findings & Recommendations. Presented by Eric Gibbs Lin Lin Elizabeth Quigley

Safety-enhanced Design EDIS 2014 R (a)(1) Computerized Provider Order Entry

Try VedaCheck now for all your ASIC needs

How to Add Usability Testing to Your Evaluation Toolbox

CUE-10: Moderation Page 1. Comparative Usability Evaluation 10. Moderation. Observing usability test moderators

1. The Best Practices Section < >

WEBSITE DESIGN BRIEF AND QUESTIONNAIRE

OUTLINE. Advanced Technical Communication & Writing Skills. What is technical communication? Technical communication skills

COMP 6650 Web Usability Semester Project Report

DHCS PPSDS. End User Guide. Applies to: California DHCS. WITS Version 18.0+

Chapter 4. Evaluating Interface Designs

Usability Study Report

DESIGNING HELP FEATURES TO SUPPORT BLIND USERS INTERACTIONS WITH DIGITAL LIBRARIES

Headings: Website usability. Website design. Transit websites. Surveys/Knowledge Management. User-Centered System Design. Chapel Hill Transit

Web Site Project (Final Project / 30% of grade)

Usability Tests and Heuristic Reviews Planning and Estimation Worksheets

Invisible environments: How to conduct qualitative research within digital spaces

Google Analytics. Gain insight into your users. How To Digital Guide 1

Usability Testing. November 14, 2016

Hyacinth Macaws for Seniors Survey Report

Case Study: Best Practices for Turning your Classroom Trainers into Synchronous Classroom Trainers

Buddhist Symbols Style Guide

EHR Usability Test Report of SRS EHR v10

Integrating Usability Design and Evaluation: Training Novice Evaluators in Usability Testing

USER-CENTERED DESIGN KRANACK / DESIGN 4

Analytics. EduPristine DM Analytics. EduPristine

Usability Testing Essentials

Usability Testing: A tutorial and Case Study from the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Library

Website Usability Study: The American Red Cross. Sarah Barth, Veronica McCoo, Katelyn McLimans, Alyssa Williams. University of Alabama

Nektarios Kostaras, Mixalis Xenos. Hellenic Open University, School of Sciences & Technology, Patras, Greece

ONC HIT Certification Program Test Results Summary for 2014 Edition EHR Certification. Modular EHR

GRADY NEWSOURCE KATE DEVLIN, LEAH MOSS, ANDREA SKELLIE & ASHLEY PANTER

First-Time Usability Testing for Bluetooth-Enabled Devices

Usability Audit: Findings + Recommendations: Introduction:

SWEN 444 Human Centered Requirements and Design Project Breakdown

User Centered Design - Maximising the Use of Portal

FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS

INSIGHTS 2018 Attitude towards advertising and use of ad blocking

Heuristic Evaluation of NUIG Participate Module 1

TURN DATA INTO ACTIONABLE INSIGHTS. Google Analytics Workshop

Rapid Research. For 2.0 Development. Presented by Kelly Goto

National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office Norman, OK Website Redesign Proposal Report 12/14/2015

A Usability Evaluation of Google Calendar

Usability Testing. Cha Kang & Zach Pease

K-State Libraries Usability Team Report Summer 2013

Client Scoring Application

Webinar Series. Welcome Global Users. PowerWriter. Power is organized and intelligently directed knowledge. Napoleon Hill. Refresh Learn Participate

DIGITAL CONTENT STRATEGY WORKSHOP SERIES >>> Carrie Hawthorne Consulting Fair Trade Federation Conference PART 1 UNDERSTANDING & GATHERING

Usability Testing CS 4501 / 6501 Software Testing

Digital Library Center University of Florida. Patrick Reakes Assessment Team Member Head Librarian, Journalism Library University of Florida

NVIvo 11 workshop. Hui Bian Office for Faculty Excellence

Usability Test report for Field Form

Web Systems Staff Intranet Card Sorting. Project Cover Sheet. Library Staff Intranet. UM Library Web Systems

Foundation Level Syllabus Usability Tester Sample Exam Answers

Transcription:

Executive Summary NOTE: Include high-level summary of findings here, including: Overall task performance User difficulties and frustrations with the site Significant usability findings (may include positive as well as negative findings) Methodology What happened during the usability test The usability evaluation of the [product name] was conducted by [usability team or contractor] in [city, state] on [month day, year]. During the usability evaluation, [eight] participants, matching the user profile(s), were asked to spend one hour with the site. During this hour, participants: Completed a user background questionnaire Answered questions about initial site impressions Performed real-world tasks on the site while thinking aloud Answered questions about their overall satisfaction Who we tested [Eight] participants, having the following profile characteristics, evaluated [product name]. NOTE: Add or delete main categories as needed. Refer to screener for main demographic information. Audience Type User Profile 1 2 User Profile 2 4 User Profile 3 2 TOTAL (participants) 8 Age 18-25 2 26-39 2 40-59 2 60-74 2 TOTAL (participants) 8 Computer Usage 0 to 10 hrs. wk. 2 11 to 25 hrs. wk. 4 26+ hrs. wk. 2 TOTAL (participants) 8 Gender Women 4 Men 4 TOTAL (participants) 8 Participants, matching the [product name] user profile, were recruited prior to testing with the assistance of a market research firm. Participants were compensated [$75] for their time. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services - 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. - Washington, D.C. 20201 1

What participants did During the usability evaluation, participants were asked to complete [ten (10)] scenarios or reallife tasks on the site. The tasks were presented in [random order] and [participants were instructed not to search]. The following tasks were identified from user data collection efforts and assistance from the [project team]. # Task 1 [Task statement] 2 [Task statement] 3 [Task statement] 4 [Task statement] 5 [Task statement] 6 [Task statement] 7 [Task statement] 8 [Task statement] 9 [Task statement] 10 [Task statement] What data we collected NOTE: This section should describe: Performance metrics captured and a description / definition of each metric Preference metrics captured and a description / definition of each metric Where we tested Following is a summary of the participants computing environment: URL of tested website: [http://www.sitename.gov] Computer platforms: [Dell Pentium IV with an 18 display] Browser tested: [Internet Explorer 6.0] Screen resolution: [1024 X 768] Operating system: [Windows XP] Connection speed: [Shared T1] NOTE: This section should also describe: Information about usability logging tools Video/audio recording equipment Set-up of the testing and observation rooms, etc. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services - 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. - Washington, D.C. 20201 2

Introductory Questions & Tasks At the beginning of each session, we asked participants [four] questions, including: Have you heard of [site]? Just from looking at this site, what kinds of information do you think you could get from this site? Please be specific. Who do you think this site is designed for? Why? Who manages this site? [Include summary of participants comments] U.S. Department of Health & Human Services - 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. - Washington, D.C. 20201 3

Findings & Recommendations NOTE: This section should include: Usability findings observed in usability testing Evidence to support the finding, including performance and preference data Video clips to illustrate the finding (optional) Screenshots with callouts to illustrate the finding (optional) Severity ratings (optional) Research-based recommendations The detailed findings may be organized in one of two ways, either: By scenario By type of issue If organized by type of issue, the findings may coincide with the organization of the Research- Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines: Homepage Presentation, Layout and Visual Design Navigation, Links and Terminology Content Forms Search Accessibility Hardware and Software Please note that we are including two different formats for the findings and recommendations section of the report. Please select the format that works best for you. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services - 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. - Washington, D.C. 20201 4

Home Page Issues Finding [#1]: [Finding Statement] Participants performed better and preferred a plain background to the patterned background. Figure 1 Supporting Evidence [Statements of supporting evidence.] Recommendations/Comments [Statements of recommendations.] U.S. Department of Health & Human Services - 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. - Washington, D.C. 20201 5

Scenario #1 Scenario [#1] Number of participants [8] % successful [100%] Participants performed better and preferred a plain background to the patterned background. Supporting Evidence [Statements of supporting evidence.] Recommendations/Comments [Statements of recommendations.] U.S. Department of Health & Human Services - 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. - Washington, D.C. 20201 6

Exit Questions/User Impressions At the end of each session, we asked participants [nine] questions: What is your overall impression to [site]? What is your impression of the search capability? Do you feel this site is current? Why? What did you like best about the site? What did you like least about the site? If you were the website developer, what would be the first thing you would do to improve the website? Is there anything that you feel is missing on this site? (Probe: content or site features/functions) If you were to describe this site to a colleague in a sentence or two, what would you say? Do you have any other final comments or questions? [Include summary of participants comments] U.S. Department of Health & Human Services - 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. - Washington, D.C. 20201 7

Appendices NOTE: This section should include: Detailed information about the usability test that was not included in the report Copies of all guides, instructions, forms, and questionnaires used in the usability test so that the test can easily be recreated U.S. Department of Health & Human Services - 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. - Washington, D.C. 20201 8