SUMMARY OF RESULTS BENCHMARK PROFILE. server.

Similar documents
E-BUSINESS APPLICATIONS R12 (RUP 3) RECEIVABLES ONLINE PROCESSING: Using Oracle10g on an IBM System P5 595

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (RUP 4) LARGE/EXTRA-LARGE PAYROLL (BATCH) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE10g ON A HEWLETT-PACKARD PROLIANT DL380 G6 SERVER

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (R12.2.5) ORDER MANAGEMENT (OLTP) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE11g

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (R12.2.5) HR (OLTP) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE11g ON ORACLE S CLOUD INFRASTRUCTURE

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (R12.1.3) HR (OLTP) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE DATABASE 11g ON FUJITSU S M10-4S SERVER RUNNING SOLARIS 11

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (R12.1.3) iprocurement (OLTP) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE DATABASE 11g ON FUJITSU S M10-4S SERVER RUNNING SOLARIS 11

E-BUSINESS APPLICATIONS 11i ( ) TELCO BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE10g ON AN IBM SYSTEM p5 570 SERVER

COMPARISON OF ORACLE APPLICATION SERVER, WEBLOGIC AND WEBSPHERE USING PEOPLESOFT ENTERPRISE ONLINE MARKETING 8.9

PEOPLESOFT ELM 9.0 SELF-SERVICE

PEOPLESOFT ENTERPRISE PORTAL 8.9

PEOPLESOFT HRMS 8.9 SELF-SERVICE USING DB2 FOR Z/OS 8.1 ON

COMPARISON OF ORACLE APPLICATION SERVER, WEBLOGIC AND WEBSPHERE USING PEOPLESOFT ENTERPRISE CAMPUS SOLUTIONS 8.9

PEOPLESOFT CRM FOR COMMUNICATIONS 8.9 USING DB2 UDB FOR AIX ON IBM pseries 630 and 650 SERVERS

PEOPLESOFT HRMS 9.1 SELF-SERVICE USING ORACLE

PEOPLESOFT CRM FOR SUPPORT 8.9

ORACLE ENTERPRISE EXPENSES 8.8 USING DB2 FOR Z/OS 8.1 ON AN IBM z B16 with 313 Feature [6-way LPAR]

PEOPLESOFT 8.8 ENTERPRISE PORTAL

ORACLE S PEOPLESOFT GENERAL LEDGER 9.2 (WITH COMBO EDITING) USING ORACLE DATABASE 11g FOR ORACLE SOLARIS (UNICODE) ON AN ORACLE S SPARC T7-2 Server

PEOPLESOFT ENTERPRISE PORTAL SOLUTION 8.4 USING ORACLE9i ON SUN MICROSYSTEMS SUN FIRE V480 SERVERS

E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (R12.1.3) (OLTP)

PSR Testing of the EnterpriseOne Adapter for JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 8.12, OBIEE , DAC 7.9.6, and Informatica 8.6

Infor Lawson on IBM i 7.1 and IBM POWER7+

Infor M3 on IBM POWER7+ and using Solid State Drives

An Oracle White Paper September Oracle Utilities Meter Data Management Demonstrates Extreme Performance on Oracle Exadata/Exalogic

Lawson M3 7.1 Large User Scaling on System i

Performance and Scalability Benchmark: Siebel CRM Release 7 on HP-UX Servers and Oracle9i Database. An Oracle White Paper Released October 2003

A Rational software Whitepaper 05/25/03. IBM Rational Rapid Developer Scalability and Performance Benchmark

An Oracle White Paper. Released April 2013

System Requirements. SAS Profitability Management 2.3. Deployment Options. Supported Operating Systems and Versions. Windows Server Operating Systems

Oracle Primavera P6 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Performance and Sizing Guide. An Oracle White Paper April 2011

Newest generation of HP ProLiant DL380 takes #1 position overall on Oracle E-Business Suite Small Model Benchmark

SAP SD Benchmark with DB2 and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 on IBM System x3850 M2

... WebSphere 6.1 and WebSphere 6.0 performance with Oracle s JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 8.12 on IBM Power Systems with IBM i

IBM System Storage DS8870 Release R7.3 Performance Update

An Oracle White Paper Released April 2008

E-BUSINESS APPLICATIONS 11i ( ) BENCHMARK -

Optimizing Fusion iomemory on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 for Database Performance Acceleration. Sanjay Rao, Principal Software Engineer

Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Object Usage Tracking Performance Characterization Using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Object Usage Tracking

HP SAS benchmark performance tests

HP Intelligent Management Center SOM Administrator Guide

Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Object Usage Tracking Performance Characterization Using JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Object Usage Tracking

An Oracle White Paper Released October 2008

Executive Brief June 2014

An Oracle Technical White Paper October Sizing Guide for Single Click Configurations of Oracle s MySQL on Sun Fire x86 Servers

QLE10000 Series Adapter Provides Application Benefits Through I/O Caching

Oracle Hyperion Planning on the Oracle Database Appliance using Oracle Transparent Data Encryption

IBM System i Model 515 offers new levels of price performance

IBM Power Systems Performance Report. POWER9, POWER8 and POWER7 Results

Structure and Overview of Manuals

Reduce Costs & Increase Oracle Database OLTP Workload Service Levels:

How Smarter Systems Deliver Smarter Economics and Optimized Business Continuity

z/vm Large Memory Linux on System z

... IBM AIX performance and tuning tips for Oracle s JD Edwards EnterpriseOne web server

IBM and Lawson M3 (an Infor affiliate) ERP software workload optimization on the new IBM PureFlex System

Delivering High-Performance Oracle Applications Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1

... IBM Advanced Technical Skills IBM Oracle International Competency Center September 2013

Personality Next Generation Operating Environment. Last updated: Mar-2015

Oracle Database Appliance characterization with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

JVM Performance Study Comparing Java HotSpot to Azul Zing Using Red Hat JBoss Data Grid

Vertical Scaling of Oracle 10g Performance on Red Hat

Optimizing Data Integration Solutions by Customizing the IBM InfoSphere Information Server Deployment Architecture IBM Redbooks Solution Guide

Oracle s JD Edwards EnterpriseOne IBM POWER7 performance characterization

Optimize Your Heterogeneous SOA Infrastructure

Sun Fire X4170 M2 Server Frequently Asked Questions

Oracle Database 12c: JMS Sharded Queues

Red Hat Virtualization 4.0

A Performance Characterization of Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Virtual Machines on Dell PowerEdge Servers Running VMware ESX Server 3.

Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization 3.6

Using Oracle In-Memory Advisor with JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Oracle Retail WebTrack Release Notes Release September 2007

IBM Power Systems solution for SugarCRM

... Oracle Database 11g and 12c on IBM Power E870 and E880. Tips and considerations

ArcExplorer -- Java Edition 9.0 System Requirements

Dell PowerEdge R910 SQL OLTP Virtualization Study Measuring Performance and Power Improvements of New Intel Xeon E7 Processors and Low-Voltage Memory

Maintaining End-to-End Service Levels for VMware Virtual Machines Using VMware DRS and EMC Navisphere QoS

HP Operations Orchestration

vrealize Business System Requirements Guide

Data Sheet: Storage Management Veritas Storage Foundation for Oracle RAC from Symantec Manageability and availability for Oracle RAC databases

Introduction. Architecture Overview

ETERNUS SF AdvancedCopy Manager Overview

Service Manager 9.31 web client end-to-end performance test report

InfoBrief. Dell 2-Node Cluster Achieves Unprecedented Result with Three-tier SAP SD Parallel Standard Application Benchmark on Linux

An Oracle White Paper September Oracle Integrated Stack Complete, Trusted Enterprise Solutions

Active Energy Manager. Image Management. TPMfOSD BOFM. Automation Status Virtualization Discovery

Oracle PeopleSoft Applications for IBM z Systems

Veritas Volume Replicator Option by Symantec

HP Operations Orchestration

REFERENCE ARCHITECTURE Microsoft SQL Server 2016 Data Warehouse Fast Track. FlashStack 70TB Solution with Cisco UCS and Pure Storage FlashArray//X

Teamcenter Installation on Windows Clients Guide. Publication Number PLM00012 J

Storwize V7000 real-time compressed volumes with Symantec Veritas Storage Foundation

W H I T E P A P E R. Comparison of Storage Protocol Performance in VMware vsphere 4

Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 workload optimization on the new IBM PureFlex System

Improve Data Integration with Changed Data Capture. An Oracle Data Integrator Technical Brief Updated December 2006

IBM WebSphere Application Server V3.5, Advanced Edition for Linux Extends Support to Red Hat, Caldera, SuSE, and TurboLinux

ORACLE IDENTITY MANAGER SIZING GUIDE. An Oracle White Paper March 2007

IBM System Storage IBM :

IBM System p5 570 POWER5+ processor and memory features offer new options

Pearson Hosted System Requirements SuccessMaker 9 3/31/2017

An Oracle White Paper December, 3 rd Oracle Metadata Management v New Features Overview

Deploying a Grid Solution with IBM InfoSphere Information Server IBM Redbooks Solution Guide

Transcription:

O RACLE E-BUSINESS B ENCHMARK R EV. 1.1 E-BUSINESS SUITE APPLICATIONS R12 (FAMILY PACK C) PRODUCT INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (PIM) (500 MILLION ITEM RECORDS) BENCHMARK - USING ORACLE10g ON IBM System x3850 SERVERS As a global leader in e-business applications, Oracle is committed to delivering high performance solutions that meet our customers expectations. Business software must deliver rich functionality with robust performance. This performance must be maintained at volumes that are representative of customer environments. Oracle benchmarks demonstrate our software s performance characteristics for a range of processing volumes in a specific configuration. Customers and prospects can use this information to determine the software, hardware, and network configurations necessary to support their processing volumes. The primary objective of our benchmarking effort is to provide as many data points as possible to support this important decision. SUMMARY OF RESULTS This batch/oltp benchmark test was run on a 16-core server. 500 M Row DB 150 Users 300 Users Weighted Response 1.07 1.14 Weighted Transactions/Second 71.24 75.46 Transactions/Hour 259,776 273,744 The benchmark measured the PIM business process response times and throughputs per second for a large database model. Testing was conducted in a controlled environment with no other applications running. The goal of this Benchmark was to obtain reference performance results for Oracle E-Business Suite R12 PIM on IBM System x servers running Linux. Note that the hourly throughput numbers mentioned above are linear extrapolations. Many factors can influence performance and your results may differ. BENCHMARK PROFILE In March 2009, Oracle conducted a benchmark in Pleasanton, CA to measure the performance of selected Oracle E- Business Product Information Management (PIM) processes in an environment running Oracle E-Business Suite R12 (Family Pack C) with Oracle10g database (10.2.0.3) for the Linux operating system on an IBM System x3850 M2 server configured with four 4-core Intel Xeon X7350 processors (16-cores total), running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (32-bit) OS. A second System x3850 was used for the middle tier. A single IBM Storage System DS5300 disk array was used for storage. COPYRIGHT 2009 Oracle, Inc. All rights reserved. Page - 1

BENCHMARK METHODOLOGY E-Business Suite R12 online and batch processes can be initiated from a browser. For this benchmark, all runs used a browser to initiate the on-line user transactions and the batch processes were initiated as concurrent programs running simultaneously with the online users. The batch workloads were run as standard concurrent processes via the concurrent manager. Hewlett-Packard LoadRunner was used as the load driver, simulating concurrent users. It submitted transactions at an average rate of one every 1.75 2.5 minutes for each concurrent user. Measurements were recorded on all of the servers when the user load was attained and the environment reached a steady state. Figure 2 shows the configuration used for this benchmark run. 300 Users System x3850 Apps Server 16-core 32 GB 27% Utilized System x3850 DB Server 16-core 32 GB DS5300 System Storage 5 Drawers Data 1 Drawer Logs BENCHMARK BUSINESS PROCESSES The E-Business Suite PIM benchmark consists of a mix of on-line transactions and batch processes running in parallel. The following table describes the on-line transactions included in the benchmark run. Oracle Application Product Flow % within App. % Overall Pacing in Min Search (30%) Keyword Search 33 10 1.75 Advanced Search 33 10 1.75 Catalog Browse 33 10 1.75 Item Creation (U.I.) (30%) Style-SKU Generation 33 10 1.75 Single Item Creation 16.5 5 1.75 Multiple Item Creation (non 16.5 5 1.75 Style-SKU) BOM/Pack Creation 16.5 5 2.25 Multiple BOM/Pack Creation (Style-SKU Pack Creation) 16.5 5 1.75 Item Maintenance (U.I.) (25%) Assign Multiple Items to Multiple Organizations (SKU Ranging) Assign Multiple Items and Pack Hierarchy (BOM Common) to Organizations (Pack Ranging) Update Attributes for a Single Item 28 7 1.75 32 8 1.75 40 10 1.75 Import (15%) Match Items 33 5 2.5 Import New Items 33 5 1.75 Import Item Updates 33 5 1.75 100% Table 1: Online Transaction Mix Figure 2: 2-Tier Configuration This benchmark was run as a Physical 3-Tier configuration with discrete machines hosting each of the Database and Application server instances. COPYRIGHT 2009 Oracle, Inc. All rights reserved. Page - 2

PROCESS FLOW DESCRIPTIONS Search: Keyword Search: Perform searches using keywords that may be part of an item number, item catalog category, manufacturer, manufacturer part number, short description or long description. Keyword search flows were based on a number of simple keywords. Advanced Search: Search for items within a category based on search criteria templates, which are specific to the category. Advanced search flows included search criteria based on item attributes and item relationships, such as suppliers. Catalog Browse: Provides navigation through a hierarchical catalog to find items based on their classification. Catalog browse flows were conducted based on selected nodes in the hierarchy, online response time to refresh hierarchy and display relevant items was measured. Item Creation: Style/SKU Generation: SKUs items were mass created for a Style Item through the Style-SKU Generation User Interface. Process was initiated from User Interface, performance was measured on the batch process creating the n ew SKU items. Single Item Creation: Single item was created through the user interface using the standard item process. Online response time was measured. Multiple Item Creation: Multiple items were created simultaneously through the user interface using the standard item process. Process was initiated from user interface, performance was measured on the batch process creating the new items. PROCESS FLOW DESCRIPTIONS CONTINUED Item Maintenance: Assign Multiple Item to Multiple Organizations: Multiple items were assigned to multiple organizations through the mass maintenance flow, assign items to organizations. The item - organization assignments were selected through the item and organization search user interface, and then updates su bmitted as a batch program. Performance was measured on the batch process creating the items - organization assignments. Assign Multiple Items and Structures (Packs) to Multiple Organizations: Pack items were selected, and then assigned to multiple organizations through the mass maintenance flow. Both the pack hierarchy and pack ite ms were assigned to the organizations. Performance was measured on the batch process creating the items - organization assignments. Update Item Attributes: Item attr ibutes were updated through the Item Workbench. Online response time was measured. Import: Match Items: Matching process was executed from the Im port Workbench, performance was measured on the batch process matching the items. Import New Items: New items were imported from the st aging / open interface tables. Performance was measured on the batch import process. Import Item Updates: Item Updates were imported from the st aging / open interface tables. Performance was measured on the batch import process. BOM/Pack Creation: Single pack hierarchy was created through the user interface. Online response time was measured. Multiple BOM/Pack Creation: Multiple pack hierarchies were created simultaneously through the standard create pack for style item/s flow. Process was initiated from user interface, performance was measured on the batch process creating the new items and structures. COPYRIGHT 2009 Oracle, Inc. All rights reserved. Page - 3

BENCHMARK RESULTS 500 Million Row Data Model Seconds Actions Per Second OLTP Users 150 300 150 300 1a. Keyword search 1.1 1.2 1b. Advance search 1.9 2 1c. Browse catalog 0.9 0.9 2a. Style/SKU generation 2b. Single item 2c. Multiple item 2d. Bom/Pack 2e. Multiple bom/pack 3a. Assign multi items to multi orgs 3b. Assign multi items and pack hierarchy to orgs 3c. Update item attributes 0.2 0.3 1.9 1.9 0.4 0.5 40 40 51 50 24 24 91 94 45 65 5a. Match items 66 64 5b. Import new items 126 134 5c. Import item 166 167 updates Weighted Averages 1.07 1.14 71.24 75.46 Approx. Trans./Min. 83.3 166.6 Table 2: PIM Transaction Results SERVER PERFORMANCE Figure 4 shows the average CPU utilization on the Database server and mid-tier server. The value shown is the average across the processors (16 cores total). e CPU Utilization - g % Avera Oracle E-Business Suite R12 PIM using Oracle10g on IBM System x 3850 Servers 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 DB Server Mid-Tier Server 150 Users 300 Users Figure 3: Average DB Server CPU Utilization Online Workload % User % % I/O % Idle System Wait DB Server - 300 19.57 3.84 0.00 76.58 DB Server - 150 11.07 2.32 0.01 86.59 Mid-Tier - 300 23.92 3.00 0.00 73.07 Mid-Tier - 150 16.95 1.94 0.00 81.11 Table 3: Average Server CPU Utilization Breakout The weighted averages are based on the business mix as reflected in Table 1: Online Process Mix. R12 Application changes, data model additions and test methodology improvements render direct comparison to previous Oracle E-Business release 11.5.10 and 11.5.9 results invalid. Average Used GB 150 Users 300 Users DB Server 12.01 GB 17.07 GB Mid-Tier server 6.86 GB 10.0 GB Table 4: Average Memory Utilization COPYRIGHT 2009 Oracle, Inc. All rights reserved. Page - 4

I/ O PERFORMANCE A DS5300 storage system equipped with six disk drawers was used for storage. The batch workload requires optimal I/ O performance. PATCHES The following patches were applied to the benchmark environment on top of Oracle E-Business Applications R12. Update to Family Pack C I/O DB DB Mid-Tier Performance 150 U. 300 U. - 150 Mid-Tier - 300 Avg tps 391. 37 712.24 161.62 186.19 during an interval: Max tps 1,036.60 1,300.10 280.70 288.10 during an interval: Max tps 0.13 0.35 0.47 0.69 interval time: Total number 2,908.44 3,581.37 3.05 132.42 of Mbytes read: Total number 12,126.21 29,831.04 2,478.19 3,551.38 of Mbytes written: Read/Write 0.24 0.12 0.00 0.04 Ratio: APPLICATION TUNING Database: create index inv.mtl_system_items_f2 on inv.mtl_system_items_b (UPPER(SEGMENT1)) parallel nologging tablespace UPGRADE_T_01; alter index inv.mtl_system_items_f2 noparallel logging ; Table 5: Average I/O Utilization Breakout DATA COMPOSITION DESCRIPTION Major data components for the model under test are summarized in the following table. Data Description Medium Large Model Items 1,000,000 Organizations 500 Item Organization Combinations 500,000,000 Suppliers 500 Item Supplier Combinations (avg. 2,000,000 of 2 per item) Item Supplier - Organizations 500,000,000 Categories (Alternate) 10,000 Average BOM levels 3 Average items per BOM 3 Table 6: Data Composition COPYRIGHT 2009 Oracle, Inc. All rights reserved. Page - 5

BENCHMARK ENVIR ONMENT HARDWARE CONFIGURATION An IBM System x3850 M2 (7233-4RU) server was used for the database server. It was equipped with the following: 4 2.93 GHz Intel Xeon Four-Core X7350 processors (16 cores total), each with 2 3 MB of Leve l 2 cache and 12 MB of Level 3 cache Total M emory : 32 GB Network: Gigabit full duplex. Operating system: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 For more details on the IBM S ystem x3850 M2, please visit http://www- 03.ibm.com/s ystems/x/hardware/ente rprise/x3850m2/in dex.html.html Storage: DS5300 with a total o f 48 145 GB 15K RPM fibre-channel disks. For more details on DS53 00, please visit http://www.ibm.com/servers/storage/disk/ds5000/ds530 0/index.html An IBM System x3850 M2 (7233-4RU) server was used for the application/web server. It was equipped with the following: 4 2.93 GHz Intel Xeon Four-Core X7350 processors (16 cores total), each with 2 3 MB of Level 2 cache and 12 MB of Level 3 cache SOFTWARE VERSIONS Oracle s E-Business Suite R12 PIM (Family Pack C [~12.1.1]) Oracle10g 10.2.0.3 (64-bit) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 update 4 (32-bit) (on the database server) Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 update 4 (32-bit) (on the application/web server and Concurrent Manager server) Note: Oracle accepts that the results obtained using Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 very closely approximates results that may be obtained if Oracle Enterprise Linux 4 update 4 were used in this test. Java 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1. 4.2). Classic VM (build 1.4.2, J2RE 1.4.2) Glossary and Acronyms: ATP Available to Promise BEE Batch Element Entries HVOP High Volume Order Processing OASB Oracle Applications Standard Benchmark PIM Product Information Management RAC Real Applications Clusters To tal Memory: 32 GB Network: Gigabit full duplex. Operating system: Red Hat Enterprise Linu x 4 For more details on the IBM 3850 M2, please visit http://www- 03.ibm.com/systems/x/hardware/enterprise/x3850m2/in dex.html.html Oracle Applications Performance & Benchmarks 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood Shores, California 94065 Tel 650/506-7000 Fax 650/506-7000 Email ebskit_us@oracle.com World Wide Web http://www.oracle.com E-Business Suite, AppsNet, Collaboration Suite, Oracle Direct and RAC are trademarks of Oracle, Inc. Oracle, JD Edwards, PeopleSoft and Siebel are registered trademarks of Oracle Corporation and/or its affiliates. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. Copyright 2009 Oracle, Inc. All rights reserved. C/N 0XX-0409 Results Registration Number: xxxx 2009 IBM, Inc. All rights reserved. IBM, the IBM logo, AIX, System x and System Storage, are trademarks or registered trademarks of IBM Corporation in the United States and other countries. Intel and Xeon are registered trademarks of Intel Corporation in the United States, and/or other countries. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States, other countries, or both. Java and all Java-based trademarks are trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States, other countries, or both. COPYRIGHT 2009 Oracle, Inc. All rights reserved. Page - 6