axis, and wavelength tuning is achieved by translating the grating along a scan direction parallel to the x

Similar documents
Variable line-space gratings: new designs for use in grazing incidence spectrometers

Diffraction. Single-slit diffraction. Diffraction by a circular aperture. Chapter 38. In the forward direction, the intensity is maximal.

Efficient wave-optical calculation of 'bad systems'

Lens Design I. Lecture 4: Properties of optical systems III Herbert Gross. Summer term

specular diffuse reflection.

Modeling of diffractive optical elements for lens design.

Supplementary Figure 1 Optimum transmissive mask design for shaping an incident light to a desired

Geometrical Optics. Chapter General Comments. 1.2 Snell s Law

DIFFRACTION 4.1 DIFFRACTION Difference between Interference and Diffraction Classification Of Diffraction Phenomena

Basic optics. Geometrical optics and images Interference Diffraction Diffraction integral. we use simple models that say a lot! more rigorous approach

Optics II. Reflection and Mirrors

Lenses lens equation (for a thin lens) = (η η ) f r 1 r 2

Effective Medium Theory, Rough Surfaces, and Moth s Eyes

Experiment 8 Wave Optics

Chapter 36. Image Formation

Optics Vac Work MT 2008

Geometrical Optics INTRODUCTION. Wave Fronts and Rays

Lens Design I. Lecture 3: Properties of optical systems II Herbert Gross. Summer term

Final Exam. Today s Review of Optics Polarization Reflection and transmission Linear and circular polarization Stokes parameters/jones calculus

Chapter 38. Diffraction Patterns and Polarization

Waves & Oscillations

Grating Spectrometer GRATING.TEX KB

Ray Optics. Lecture 23. Chapter 23. Physics II. Course website:

Spectrometers: Monochromators / Slits

Lens Design I. Lecture 11: Imaging Herbert Gross. Summer term

Diffraction from small and large circular apertures

Optics and Images. Lenses and Mirrors. Matthew W. Milligan

2.3 Thin Lens. Equating the right-hand sides of these equations, we obtain the Newtonian imaging equation:

UNIT 102-9: INTERFERENCE AND DIFFRACTION

Diffraction. Light bends! Diffraction assumptions. Solution to Maxwell's Equations. The far-field. Fraunhofer Diffraction Some examples

Lens Design I. Lecture 1: Basics Herbert Gross. Summer term

Calculation of the diffraction efficiency on concave gratings based on Fresnel Kirchhoff s diffraction formula

OPTI510R: Photonics. Khanh Kieu College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona Meinel building R.626

Figure 1: Derivation of Bragg s Law

Control of Light. Emmett Ientilucci Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science 8 May 2007

WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE

Aberrations in Holography

HOLOGRAPHY. New-generation diffraction gratings. E. A. Sokolova

Reflection and Refraction

OPTI510R: Photonics. Khanh Kieu College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona Meinel building R.626

Interference of Light

Rectangular Lenslet Array

Chapter 36. Diffraction. Dr. Armen Kocharian

Chapter 36 Diffraction

index of refraction-light speed

Waves & Oscillations

Reflection & Mirrors

Engineered Diffusers Intensity vs Irradiance

PH 222-3A Fall Diffraction Lectures Chapter 36 (Halliday/Resnick/Walker, Fundamentals of Physics 8 th edition)

Chapter 2: Wave Optics

Ray optics! Postulates Optical components GRIN optics Matrix optics

Ray Optics I. Last time, finished EM theory Looked at complex boundary problems TIR: Snell s law complex Metal mirrors: index complex

Chapter 3 Geometric Optics

Diffraction Gratings

FRESNEL DIFFRACTION AND PARAXIAL WAVE EQUATION. A. Fresnel diffraction

Physics 1CL WAVE OPTICS: INTERFERENCE AND DIFFRACTION Fall 2009

INTRODUCTION REFLECTION AND REFRACTION AT BOUNDARIES. Introduction. Reflection and refraction at boundaries. Reflection at a single surface

Spectrographs. C. A. Griffith, Class Notes, PTYS 521, 2016 Not for distribution.

Lab 12 - Interference-Diffraction of Light Waves

2. THE PHYSICS OF DIFFRACTION GRATINGS

Advanced Lens Design

Ray optics! 1. Postulates of ray optics! 2. Simple optical components! 3. Graded index optics! 4. Matrix optics!!

P H Y L A B 1 : G E O M E T R I C O P T I C S

PHYSICS. Chapter 33 Lecture FOR SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS A STRATEGIC APPROACH 4/E RANDALL D. KNIGHT

Geometric Optics. The Law of Reflection. Physics Waves & Oscillations 3/20/2016. Spring 2016 Semester Matthew Jones

2.710 Optics Spring 09 Solutions to Problem Set #1 Posted Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009

E x Direction of Propagation. y B y

Introduction. Part I: Measuring the Wavelength of Light. Experiment 8: Wave Optics. Physics 11B

Physics 123 Optics Review

AUTOMATED 4 AXIS ADAYfIVE SCANNING WITH THE DIGIBOTICS LASER DIGITIZER

PHY 222 Lab 11 Interference and Diffraction Patterns Investigating interference and diffraction of light waves

Null test for a highly paraboloidal mirror

AP Physics: Curved Mirrors and Lenses

Astronomical spectrographs. ASTR320 Wednesday February 20, 2019

MEASUREMENT OF THE WAVELENGTH WITH APPLICATION OF A DIFFRACTION GRATING AND A SPECTROMETER

PHYS 202 Notes, Week 8

Coupling of surface roughness to the performance of computer-generated holograms

Dynamical Theory of X-Ray Diffraction

A three-dimensional Gaussian-beam ray-tracing program for designing interferometerõpolarimeter plasma diagnostics

EELE 482 Lab #3. Lab #3. Diffraction. 1. Pre-Lab Activity Introduction Diffraction Grating Measure the Width of Your Hair 5

Light: Geometric Optics (Chapter 23)

Understanding and selecting diffraction gratings

Basic Polarization Techniques and Devices 1998, 2003 Meadowlark Optics, Inc

Fundamental Optics for DVD Pickups. The theory of the geometrical aberration and diffraction limits are introduced for

Reflection, Refraction and Polarization of Light

INTRODUCTION TO The Uniform Geometrical Theory of Diffraction

Light: Geometric Optics

dq dt I = Irradiance or Light Intensity is Flux Φ per area A (W/m 2 ) Φ =

3B SCIENTIFIC PHYSICS

ELECTROMAGNETIC diffraction by perfectly conducting

Experimental Competition. Sample Solution

AP* Optics Free Response Questions

Interference of Light

PHYS:1200 LECTURE 32 LIGHT AND OPTICS (4)

PHY 171 Lecture 6 (January 18, 2012)

Chapter 37. Wave Optics

Fresnel's biprism and mirrors

ANOMALOUS SCATTERING FROM SINGLE CRYSTAL SUBSTRATE

Interference of Light

Ray Optics Demonstration Set (RODS) and Ray Optics Demonstration Set Plus (RODS+) USER S GUIDE

Transcription:

Exponential-Grating Monochromator Kenneth C. Johnson, October 0, 08 Abstract A monochromator optical design is described, which comprises a grazing-incidence reflection and two grazing-incidence mirrors, one on each side of the. The operates in conical diffraction mode and has an exponential phase function, so that the wavelength can be scanned by translating the surface in the phase-gradient direction. The wavelength can be continuously tuned over a wide spectral range while maintaining zeroaberration performance over the full range, and perfect blazing is also achieved over the full illumination aperture at all wavelengths. *** Aspnes [, ] developed a monochromator design that uses an exponential diffraction to achieve wavelength tunability via translational displacement of the. As a result of the exponential phase distribution on the surface, a surface translation along the exponential gradient direction is equivalent to a uniform dimensional scaling of the local period, so the monochromator s selected wavelength is similarly scaled. However, Aspnes design has limited utility for grazing-incidence EUV and X-ray s because the would have to be excessively long in the translation direction. (The illumination area on the is greatly elongated due to the shallow grazing angle, and the aperture would need to be even longer to accommodate the scan range.) Hettrick [3] developed an alternative exponential design in which the scan direction is transverse, not parallel, to the illumination spot s long dimension, so scanning can be achieved with a of practical size. But Hettrick s design requires curved lines, which cannot be easily manufactured for EUV/X-ray applications. An alternative monochromator design that overcomes the limitations of Aspnes and Hettrick s designs is illustrated in Figures A (plan view) and B (side view). The is planar and will be described with reference to x, x, x 3 Cartesian coordinates with the x and x axes parallel to the plane. The substrate is in the plane x3 0. The lines are straight and orthogonal to the x axis, and wavelength tuning is achieved by translating the along a scan direction parallel to the x axis. The operates in conical diffraction mode, with the incidence plane transverse to the scan direction. The incident beam and diffracted beam cover an illumination spot that is greatly elongated in the x direction due to the shallow grazing incidence.

incident beam x illumination spot diffracted beam scan direction x Figure A x 3 incident beam diffracted beam x Figure B The profile has a blazed, sawtooth form, as illustrated schematically in Figure. The lines are boundaries between facets. The structure is defined by a phase function [ x, x], a continuous function of x and x that takes on integer values on the

3 lines. (In this description, function arguments are delimited by square braces [ ] while round braces ( ) are reserved for grouping. Phase quantities are defined in cycle units; cycle = radian.) The phase is an exponential function of x, ( g0 / c)(exp[ cx] ) () The line density (phase gradient) is, g, x x 0, g g0exp[ cx] () (The local period is / g.) x 3 Ω = - Ω = - Ω = 0 Ω = Ω = x Figure The design will be described for a particular wavelength, which is selected by the monochromator slit at a particular position. As a result of the s exponential phase, a lateral translation of the in the x direction is equivalent to a uniform scale change of the local period, so the selected wavelength will be scaled by the same factor. The incident beam has an optical phase function [ x, x, x3], for wavelength originating from a particular source point. The incident electromagnetic field amplitude is proportional to exp[ i ]. The field s spatial frequency vector f (aka. wave vector ) is the phase gradient, f f, f, f3,, x x x (3) 3 The field satisfies the eikonal equation (which is the basis of geometric optics), f f f f f / (4) 3

4 The diffracted field is similarly characterized by its phase and phase gradient f, f f, f, f 3,, x x x (5) 3 f f f f (6) 3 The diffracted beam s phase function is defined by the relation in the plane ( x 3 0 ), [ x, x,0] [ x, x,0] [ x, x] (7) The additive relation applies to the phase gradient ( x and x derivatives of Eq. (7)), f, f f g, f (8) (Eq s. (7) and (8) are for order- diffraction; for order- m diffraction replace and g by m and mg.) f 3 and f 3 are determined from Eq s. (4) and (6) (with square root signs consistent with the diffraction geometry illustrated in Figure B), f f f f (9) 3 f f f f (0) 3 The output beam can be focused to a point in the monochromator s exit slit by means of a grazing-incidence mirror following the. The optics need only be designed to provide zero-aberration focusing for a single wavelength; it will automatically also exhibit the same zeroaberration performance for all other wavelengths. The incident wave geometry can be defined to achieve perfect blazing over the full beam aperture at the design wavelength, and based on the wavelength-scaling property of the exponential perfect blazing will also be achieved at all other wavelengths. Figure 3 shows an optical schematic of the monochromator. Broadband radiation is spatially filtered by an entrance slit, is reflected by a curved mirror, diffracted by the, and focused by a second curved mirror onto the exit slit. The two mirrors provide sufficient degrees of freedom to achieve optimal, full-aperture blazing and zero-aberration point imaging at any selected wavelength. entrance slit mirror mirror exit slit Figure 3 The blaze condition, which generally maximizes diffraction efficiency, is satisfied when the diffracted wave vector f determined from Eq s. (8) and (0) coincides with the ray direction defined by geometric optics for reflection at the facets. The facet surface normal vector

5 n at any particular point is determined from the incident and reflected wave vectors f and f according to geometric optics, f f g 0 f ( fg) f f f f n sin 0 cos () f f where is the blaze angle, which is constant across the full. Eq. () implies the following relation, from which can be determined, f ( f g) f f f f gcot () With predefined and g specified by Eq. (), we will use Eq. () to determine f and f. Eq. () is solved for f f g f f ( g/sin ) cos (3) (The square root sign is a design choice.) f and f are derivatives of (Eq. (3)), so Eq. (3) amounts to a partial differential equation for. A solution can be obtained by defining so that f is a constant, [ x, x,0] [ x,0,0] f x (constant f ) (4) This makes the right side of Eq. (3) a function of only x (not x ), which can be directly integrated to obtain. f is defined in terms of the conic angle (for conical diffraction), f f cos (5) Eq s. (), (3), (4), and (5) are substituted into Eq. (3) to obtain the differential equation d [ x,0,0] g0exp[ cx] f sin ( g0exp[ cx] / sin ) cos (6) dx Eq. (6) is integrated to obtain [ x,0,0] g0exp[ cx] (7) g0exp[ cx] g0exp[ cx] const c f sin cos tanh f sin sin f sin sin Eq. (7) is combined with Eq. (4) to obtain [ x, x,0], and then with Eq. (7) to obtain [ x, x,0]. The full phase functions [ x, x, x3] and [ x, x, x3] can then be obtained by inte the phase from the surface along optical rays, and the curved mirror shapes 3. and 3.3 can be determined by phase matching between incident and reflected beams. The above design outline represents just one of a broad class of possible exponential designs. For a flat with scanning via translation in the x direction, the phase function [ x, x] can be an exponential function of x times an arbitrary function of x, [ x, x ] exp[ cx ] u[ x ] (8)

6 The need not be flat; it can have any curved substrate shape that has translational symmetry in the x direction, as illustrated in Figure 4. The substrate surface comprises ( x, x, x 3) coordinate points defined by a surface height function, h, which is a function only of x, x h[ x ] (9) 3 x 3 x x Figure 4 The can alternatively be scanned via rotation around a fixed axis, provided that the substrate surface has rotational symmetry around the axis. For example, Figure 5 illustrates a cylindrical with lines parallel to the cylinder axis. Other possible shapes include toroidal, conical, or planar (with the plane orthogonal to the rotation axis). The surface can be parameterized in terms of two non-cartesian coordinates and p, where is the rotational angle around the symmetry axis. (Surface point coordinates ( x, x, x 3) are functions of and p.) The constant- p contours are orthogonal to the axis so that as the surface is rotated around the axis, each surface point s coordinate changes but p does not change. The phase function is separable in and p and has an exponential dependence, [, p] exp[ c] u[ p] (0) With this type of phase function, axial rotation of the has the effect of applying a uniform scale change to.

7 axis cylindrical Figure 5 All of these types can be used with two mirrors, as illustrated in Figure 3, to provide aberration-free point imaging and optimize full-aperture blazing. The shape and curvature can be selected to simplify the mirror design, or to possibly eliminate the need for one or both mirrors. References [] Aspnes, David E. (985). U. S. Patent No. 4,49,466. [] Aspnes, D. E. (98). High-efficiency concave- monochromator with wavelengthindependent focusing characteristics. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 7(8), 056. https://doi.org/0.364/josa.7.00056 [3] Hettrick, M. C. (06). Divergent groove s: wavelength scanning in fixed geometry spectrometers. Optics Express, 4(3), 6646. https://doi.org/0.364/oe.4.06646