Request for Information Strategies to Improve Maritime Supply Chain Security and Achieve 100% Overseas Scanning

Similar documents
Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular (NVIC) 05-17; Guidelines for Addressing

Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO) DNDO Overview

Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure

IMPROVING CYBERSECURITY AND RESILIENCE THROUGH ACQUISITION

Information Collection Request: The Department of Homeland. Security, Stakeholder Engagement and Cyber Infrastructure

Views on the Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity

Request for Proposal for Technical Consulting Services

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Consultant to Develop Educational Materials for the Applied Informatics Team Training

University of Hawaii REQUEST FOR INFORMATION Strategic Communication Service Platform

AGENCY: National Weather Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Mobile Application for Public Health Surveillance

Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure:

National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) Energy Sector Asset Management

Technical Conference on Critical Infrastructure Protection Supply Chain Risk Management

Supply Chain Security Since 9/11

Cargo Security Programs. March 2011

GLOBAL THREAT REDUCTION INITIATIVE DOMESTIC SOURCE SECURITY OVERVIEW

How AlienVault ICS SIEM Supports Compliance with CFATS

OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3000DEFENSEPENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC

White Paper. View cyber and mission-critical data in one dashboard

The next generation of knowledge and expertise

Google Cloud & the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Updates to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Washington State Emergency Management Association (WSEMA) Olympia, WA

Mapping to the National Broadband Plan

STRENGTHENING THE CYBERSECURITY OF FEDERAL NETWORKS AND CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Control Systems Cyber Security Awareness

Board of Directors Telecommunications Regulatory Authority. The Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (the Authority ) Board of Directors,

Mitigation Framework Leadership Group (MitFLG) Charter DRAFT

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ZONING ORDINANCE

National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) Mobile Application Single Sign

Information Security Policy

Negotiations or Clarifications - Do you know the difference?

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Licensing of Data Telecommunications Services

Expert support and Reach back activities

Department of Homeland Security Updates

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 90

SINGLE SPACE ELECTRONIC PARKING METERS RFI NO PAGE

GUIDANCE: INSTALLED CAPACITY & FINAL INSTALLED CAPACITY Version 1

FIJIAN ELECTIONS OFFICE SYSTEM CONSULTANCY AUDIT. Expression of Interest (EOI) (04/2017)

COUNTERING IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES

DHS Cybersecurity: Services for State and Local Officials. February 2017

The Office of Infrastructure Protection

Member of the County or municipal emergency management organization

NIS Directive : Call for Proposals

UAE s National Integrated Planning for nuclear power infrastructure development

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013

Summary of Consultation with Key Stakeholders

Incentives for IoT Security. White Paper. May Author: Dr. Cédric LEVY-BENCHETON, CEO

DFARS Cyber Rule Considerations For Contractors In 2018

HUMBOLDT COUNTY Website Accessibility Policy

Good morning, Chairman Harman, Ranking Member Reichert, and Members of

Instructions for Submitting Applications Using TCFOR

Security and resilience in Information Society: the European approach

RÉPUBLIQUE D HAÏTI Liberté Egalité - Fraternité

10 Considerations for a Cloud Procurement. March 2017

TSA/FTA Security and Emergency Management Action Items for Transit Agencies

Unofficial Comment Form Project Modifications to CIP Standards Requirements for Transient Cyber Assets CIP-003-7(i)

Inter-American Port Security Cooperation Plan

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Scaling-up Renewable Energy Program (SREP) Joint Mission. Lesotho

Alternative Fuel Vehicles in State Energy Assurance Planning

Medical Device Cybersecurity: FDA Perspective

Position Description. Engagement Manager UNCLASSIFIED. Outreach & Engagement Information Assurance and Cyber Security Directorate.

THE WHITE HOUSE. Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER

GUIDELINES ON MARITIME CYBER RISK MANAGEMENT

Cyber Security Incident Report

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 4, 2016

PIPELINE SECURITY An Overview of TSA Programs

The Internet Society. on behalf of. The IETF Administrative Oversight Committee. Request for Proposal. RFC Editor RFC Format CSS Design

NW NATURAL CYBER SECURITY 2016.JUNE.16

Presidential Executive Order on Strengthening the Cybersecurity of Federal Networks and Critical Infrastructure

Connecticut Department of Department of Administrative Services and the Broadband Technology Opportunity Program (BTOP) 8/20/2012 1

Request for Proposal To develop and teach a Training Course on RTCA Airworthiness Security Documents (DO-326A, DO-355, and DO-356A)

Standard CIP Cyber Security Critical Cyber Asset Identification

Quadrennial Homeland Security Review (QHSR) Ensuring Resilience to Disasters

BENCHMARKING PPP PROCUREMENT 2017 IN ARMENIA

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Transition Plan Technical Conference #1

TARGET2-SECURITIES INFORMATION SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

DHS Cybersecurity. Election Infrastructure as Critical Infrastructure. June 2017

Welcome & Housekeeping. Marie-Christine Haubert

United States Energy Association Energy Technology and Governance Program REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

ISO/IEC Solution Brief ISO/IEC EventTracker 8815 Centre Park Drive, Columbia MD 21045

National Level Exercise 2018 After-Action Findings

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT OF PROCUREMENT

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY ATTACHMENT A A-1: BACKGROUND AND CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS A-2: SCOPE OF WORK

July 13, Via to RE: International Internet Policy Priorities [Docket No ]

Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity

THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary EXECUTIVE ORDER

Introduction to AWS GoldBase

New Information Collection Request: The Department of. Homeland Security, Office of Cybersecurity and

IBM Security Services Overview

BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. [Docket No. RM ] Cyber Systems in Control Centers

March 21, 2016 MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES. Building National Capabilities for Long-Term Drought Resilience

COUNTERING COUNTERING SPAM IN A DIGITAL WORLD

IAEA Perspective: The Framework for the Security of Radioactive Material and Associated Facilities

Solicitation TOSS8187. Notice of Proposed Sole Source: DVR's and External Hard Drives. State of Utah

Shaw Privacy Policy. 1- Our commitment to you

Punta Gorda eprocurement Site. How to navigate the Bid System

Transcription:

Request for Information Strategies to Improve Maritime Supply Chain Security and Achieve 100% Overseas Scanning May 2, 2016 1

STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE MARITIME SUPPLY CHAIN SECURITY AND ACHIEVE 100% OVERSEAS SCANNING 1. PURPOSE This is a Request for Information (RFI). The objective of this RFI is to gather relevant information from interested, capable sources on new strategies for reducing the risk of a radiological and nuclear threat leaving a foreign port of departure via maritime cargo. In particular, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is seeking information, recommendations, or proposed solutions for DHS and its external stakeholders to achieve the requirement of 100 percent overseas scanning established by the Security and Accountability for Every (SAFE) Port Act of 2006, as amended. 1 DHS is interested in both technical and nontechnical approaches, and solicits responses from a broad range of responders, to include providers of supplies and services, as well as the non-vendor stakeholder community and nontraditional contractors. We strongly encourage innovative approaches from all sources to achieve this requirement, along with accompanying suggestions or recommendations for a means to implement the proposed solution, including through traditional procurement contracts or other types of instruments. 2. SCOPE The RFI is focused on improving the security of maritime containerized and non-containerized cargo departing foreign seaports and bound for the United States to protect against radiological/nuclear threats. Passenger security concerns are not within the scope of this request. Instead, the RFI solicits input for new programs, capabilities, models, strategies, or approaches through which DHS and our partners can make progress toward achieving the SAFE Port Act 100 percent overseas scanning requirements and enhanced security of maritime cargo bound for the United States. 3. BACKGROUND The 100 percent overseas scanning provision requires that a container that was loaded on a vessel in a foreign port shall not enter the United States (either directly or via a foreign port) unless the container was scanned by nonintrusive imaging equipment and radiation detection equipment at a foreign port before it was loaded on a vessel. 6 U.S.C. 982(b)(1). The purpose 1 The Security and Accountability for Every Port (SAFE Port) Act (Pub. L. No. 109 347; enacted October 13, 2006), Section 232, codified at 6 U.S.C. 982, as amended by Section 1701 of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (Pub. L. No.110 53; August 3, 2007). 2

of this requirement is to prevent exploitation of the maritime supply chain to introduce nuclear or other radioactive materials into the country. The 100 percent scanning law does not mandate the use of particular equipment, nor does it specify the manner in which alarms must be resolved. DHS is particularly interested in scanning models or commercial approaches that leverage private sector resources and expertise to improve the security of the maritime supply chain system and increase the percentage of containers scanned overseas. The DHS objective will be to identify opportunities to refine current practices or develop new approaches to scanning. 4. INFORMATION SOUGHT DHS is looking for recommendations and information to achieve the specified requirement of 100 percent scanning (both nonintrusive imaging and radiation detection) in foreign seaports for all U.S.-bound maritime containerized cargo. Additionally, DHS is looking for recommendations and information to improve the security of both containerized, and non-containerized maritime cargo (e.g., dry/liquid bulk, breakbulk, rollon/roll-off, etc.), bound for the United States. Hence, the recommendations should support the following national-level desired outcomes: Increase the amount of U.S.-bound maritime cargo scanned; Improve global radiological/nuclear detection capability and capacity; and Reduce nuclear and other radioactive materials out of regulatory control in the global maritime shipping environment. The proposed strategy or recommendations Must be robust and adaptable to remain viable in the face of adaptation, response, and innovation by an adversary; May include risk reduction opportunities that rely on protective and preventive measures in addition to scanning for detection and discovery; May consider opportunities to reduce vulnerability, realize resource efficiencies, and improve deployment feasibility through: o Deploying mobile assets designed for quick deployment to multiple locations; o Enhancing current administrative and security controls throughout the supply chain; o Alternative scanning, data reporting, and information-sharing regimes; o Deploying solutions to protect containers from intrusion; o Deploying programs that augment deterrence; o Increasing awareness of security risks and potential solutions among the critical players in the global maritime cargo supply chain; and o Cost-sharing and third party operation and management of programs. Recommendations are encouraged across the full solution space as defined by Doctrine / policy, Organization, Training, Materiel, Leadership / education, Personnel, and Facilities plus Regulations, Authorities, Grants, and Standards. Regardless of the type, the recommendations 3

should be categorized either as near-term solutions or quick wins that are fast, low cost, easy to implement, and yield immediate payoffs, as well as longer-term solutions that may require some additional development. The discussion of each recommendation should include how it might be implemented, an assessment of its viability, and an estimated cost to implement. 5. CONDITIONS OF THE RFI This RFI does not constitute a Request for Proposals (RFP), Broad Agency Announcement (BAA), or promise to issue a Solicitation for supplies or services. The Government will not pay for costs associated with developing a response to this RFI. Respondents to this RFI should not anticipate feedback regarding their submissions, other than acknowledgment of receipt. Some respondents may be contacted by DHS for a follow-on discussion per the schedule shown in Section 7. This RFI does not commit the Government to enter into any contractual agreement, nor will the Government pay for information solicited hereunder. Not responding to this RFI does not preclude participation in any future solicitation. The information provided in this RFI is subject to change and is not binding on the Government. All submissions in response to this RFI become the property of the Government and will not be returned. 6. SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS Interested parties are requested to respond to this RFI with list responses to any or all of the information sought in Section 4. Responses should be concise and specific. Responders are encouraged to avoid use of excessive marketing lexicon, submission of brochures, and other sales literature. Proprietary information, if any, should be minimized and MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED. To aid DHS, please segregate proprietary information. All responses shall be submitted in PDF format to DNDO.Business@HQ.DHS.GOV by the date given in Section 7. DHS reserves the right to review late submissions but makes no guarantee to the order of or possibility for review of late submissions. Responses should be limited to ten (10) pages. If additional pages are submitted, they may or may not be reviewed. Responses to this RFI may be evaluated by Government technical experts drawn from staff within DHS and other Federal agencies. The Government may use selected support contractor personnel to assist in the evaluation. These support contractors will be bound by appropriate nondisclosure agreements to protect proprietary and source-selection information. After review of the responses, DHS may request a follow-up discussion with the responder. 7. SCHEDULE AND FOLLOW-UP The following represent key submission and follow-up dates: May 2: Release RFI through www.fbo.gov May 9: Deadline to submit questions regarding the RFI to DNDO.Business@HQ.DHS.GOV May 12: Webinar to discuss the RFI starting 11 AM to 12 PM EST at https://share.dhs.gov/dhsoverseasscanning/ 4

June 6: RFI Submission deadline July 13: Invitations sent out for follow-up discussion AUG-SEPT: Follow-up discussion 5