Do Materials Get Tired- Do Rubber Bands Get Longer During Use?

Similar documents
CHAPTER 4. Numerical Models. descriptions of the boundary conditions, element types, validation, and the force

Static and dynamic simulations for automotive interiors components using ABAQUS

Microscopic Measurement

Using the fde.uwaterloo.ca fatigue database files

1. Carlos A. Felippa, Introduction to Finite Element Methods,

Modeling lattice structured materials with micropolar elasticity. Accuracy of the micropolar model. Marcus Yoder. CEDAR presentation Spring 2017

SOLIDWORKS Simulation: Material Model Types Defined

Structural Analysis of an Aluminum Spiral Staircase. EMCH 407 Final Project Presented by: Marcos Lopez and Dillan Nguyen

ENED 1090: Engineering Models I Homework Assignment #2 Due: Week of September 16 th at the beginning of your Recitation Section

Here is Instructions on reading your METRIC ruler!

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 2: Physical models of strain basic student exercise

Problem description. Prescribed. force. Unit thickness, plane stress. Transverse direction. Prescribed. displacement. Longitudinal direction

Numerical Simulation of Elastic-Plastic Deformation of Aircraft Fuel Tank Access Cover Impacted by Tyre Fragment

Madison County Schools Suggested 4 th Grade Math Pacing Guide

School District of Marshfield Mathematics Standards

CHAPTER 5 RANDOM VIBRATION TESTS ON DIP-PCB ASSEMBLY

PROCEDURE FOR TENSILE TESTING OF REINFORCING BARS

Finite Element Method. Chapter 7. Practical considerations in FEM modeling

Company VictoLab Services Presentation VKRT 2013

Using MSC.Nastran for Explicit FEM Simulations

Application Note AN-1703 Strain Filter Selection

Experimental Design and Graphical Analysis of Data

SOLIDWORKS SIMULATION

ES 128: Computer Assignment #4. Due in class on Monday, 12 April 2010

Accuracy Issues in the Simulation of Quasi Static Experiments for the Purpose of Mesh Regularization. Anthony Smith Paul Du Bois

Activity 5.6 Physical Property Analysis

3D Finite Element Software for Cracks. Version 3.2. Benchmarks and Validation

Exam paper: Numerical Analysis of Continua I

Byung Kim, Michael McKinley, William Vogt

Solid and shell elements

A rubber O-ring is pressed between two frictionless plates as shown: 12 mm mm

Impact and Postbuckling Analyses

A New Way for Multi-piece and Multi-hit Fragment Impact Simulation Using LS-DYNA

Application of Predictive Engineering Tool (ABAQUS) to Determine Optimize Rubber Door Harness Grommet Design

Operating Instructions

Supplementary document to Programming 2D/3D shape-shifting with hobbyist 3D printers

Multi-Step Analysis of a Cantilever Beam

Sample. Test Booklet. Subject: MA, Grade: 04 STAAR Grade 4 Math signup at to remove - Student name:

Using LoggerPro. Nothing is more terrible than to see ignorance in action. J. W. Goethe ( )

Measurement Lab. In this lab investigation, you will use instruments to measure the following properties: Length Mass Volume Area

DEVELOPMENT OF A NUMERICAL MODEL FOR SIMULATIONS OF SPLIT HOPKINSON PRESSURE BAR

Modeling Global Deformation using Circular Beams for Haptic Interaction

CHAPTER-10 DYNAMIC SIMULATION USING LS-DYNA

Effect of the Initial Shape of L-angle Member into Bending Properties on Push-Through Bending of Aluminum Extrusion Section

Some Aspects for the Simulation of a Non-Linear Problem with Plasticity and Contact

Activity Graphical Analysis with Excel and Logger Pro

Numerical simulation of tunnel construction in volcanic rocks

Standards for Mathematics: Grade 1

0 Graphical Analysis Use of Excel

T lighting

The part to be analyzed is the bracket from the tutorial of Chapter 3.

Each point P in the xy-plane corresponds to an ordered pair (x, y) of real numbers called the coordinates of P.

MATH STUDENT BOOK. 12th Grade Unit 4

d has a relationship with ψ

Agilent MicroLab Quant Calibration Software: Measure Oil in Water using Method IP 426

PHY 222 Lab 11 Interference and Diffraction Patterns Investigating interference and diffraction of light waves

E91 Machine Design: Lab 2

Graphs of Equations. MATH 160, Precalculus. J. Robert Buchanan. Fall Department of Mathematics. J. Robert Buchanan Graphs of Equations

Using the Workbench LS-DYNA Extension

NARROW CORRIDOR. Teacher s Guide Getting Started. Lay Chin Tan Singapore

compact pop up display

Sub-nanometer Broadband Measurement of Elastic Displacements in Optical Metrology Frames and Other Critical Elements

Simple Harmonic Motion

SSR Polygonal Search Area

Advances in LS-DYNA Metal Forming (II)

Electromechanical Materials Testing Machines EM0 series

Learning Module 8 Shape Optimization

From Motion diagrams to Position and Velocity Graphs

STAMPING ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES

ANSYS Mechanical Basic Structural Nonlinearities

Laboratory 2: 2D Strain Measurement October 12/13, 2005 BIOEN 5201 Introduction to Biomechanics Instructor: Jeff Weiss TA: Trevor Lujan

3.1 The Coordinate Plane

Optical Fiber Assemblies

Draft SPOTS Standard Part III (7)

Oaktree School Curriculum Ladder. Maths: Geometry & Measure Step 2 (7-12)

CATIA V5 Analysis. CATIA V5 Training Foils. CATIA V5 Analysis. Copyright DASSAULT SYSTEMES 1. Student Notes:

Simulation Studies for Predicting Surgical Outcomes in Breast Reconstructive Surgery

Mechanical testing machine criteria

Direction Fields; Euler s Method

CES/CMS Overview. Geometric Parameters, G,

SIMULATION CAPABILITIES IN CREO

Power Metal Fixed Resistors

A Strategy for Material Testing and Data Management for the Automotive Industry

6.2 Volumes by Disks, Washers, and Cross-Sections

Lesson 1. Unit 2 Practice Problems. Problem 2. Problem 1. Solution 1, 4, 5. Solution. Problem 3

MACRO-SCALE PRECISION ALIGNMENT. 3.1 Precision Machine Design Alignment Principles

Principal Roll Structure Design Using Non-Linear Implicit Optimisation in Radioss

Simulation of a Steel Wire Straightening Taking into Account Nonlinear Hardening of Material

% StrainMaster Portable. Full Field Measurement and Characterization of Materials, Components and Structures

Advanced Simulations with Creo Simulate 2.0

1 Measurement - Nets, Surface Area and Volume. Terms

by Photographic Method

Settlement Analysis of Piled Raft Foundation System (PRFS) in Soft Clay

KINETIC FRICTION TROUGH SURFACE MICRO ANALYSIS

Computational Simulation on Facial Expressions and Experimental Tensile Strength for Silicone Rubber as Artificial Skin

VISCO-HYPERELASTIC MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION BY RHEOLOGICAL MODELS FITTED WITH GENETIC ALGORITHMS

Describe Plane Shapes

Graphing on Excel. Open Excel (2013). The first screen you will see looks like this (it varies slightly, depending on the version):

MATHEMATICS SCOPE & SEQUENCE GRADES 2-5

Figure 30. Degrees of freedom of flat shell elements

Transcription:

Name Date Period Do Materials Get Tired- Do Rubber Bands Get Longer During Use? Background: Materials such as metals (aluminum, iron, copper, etc.), ceramics (silicon carbide, porcelain) or polymers (milk jugs made of polyethylene) are tested by scientists and engineers to reveal certain mechanical properties such as the maximum stress a material can withstand before it fails. Some materials will slowly deform when a constant force or displacement is applied to them. This time-dependent and permanent deformation is called creep. If you have ever noticed that chewing gum gradually sags when it is stuck to something or watched a plastic grocery bag gradually tear apart when it is carrying too much weight, you have observed creep! Today you will be testing the creep behavior of rubber bands! Strain, ε, is defined as the change in length of a material divided by the original length. " = l! l f l i i l f = final length of the specimen l i = initial length of the specimen For instance, after a rubber band has been stretched, if the length returns to its original value, the strain is elastic. However, if the length of the rubber band is permanently changed, the strain is plastic. Both types of strain can occur in rubber bands. Equipment: 1. Two sizes of rubber bands 2. A hook or nail attached to a wall (i.e. a coat hook or wall tack) 3. A set of mass objects of known mass 4. A metric ruler Hypotheses Read through the Procedure section to get an understanding of the experiment, then create the following hypotheses. a. State a hypothesis comparing what will happen to the rubber band for the different weights. 1

b. State a hypothesis comparing what will happen to the different size rubber bands for the same weight. c. State a hypothesis on the creep of the rubber band with time. Procedure 1. During the experiment, record all observations (i.e., changes in surface finish, color, etc.) in Table C. 2. Hang a rubber band from the hook with a light weight attached to the end in order to extent the rubber band without stretching it (see l i in Figure 1). 3. Measure the total length (l i ) in cm of the rubber band. Record the mass of the weight, the length of the rubber band (l i ), and the time in Table A. 4. Hang a larger known weight on the end of the rubber band and measure the new length (l t 1 ). Record the mass of the new weight, the new length (l t 1 ) of the rubber band and the time in Table A. 5. Allow the weight to remain hanging from the rubber band for 24 hours. After the 24 hours has elapsed, measure the length (l t 2 ) of the rubber band. Record the this length of the rubber band (l t 2 ) and time in Table A. (Note: If possible, make several measurements of time and length throughout the day.) 6. Remove the weight and replace it with the initial light weight. Measure the final length to which the rubber band returns (l f ) and record it in Table A. 7. Repeat steps 1 6 using a different sized rubber band and record the data in TABLE B. Figure 1: Experimental setup of a rubber bands hanging with weights 2

TABLE A (rubber band 1) Type of Rubber Band Mass of initial light weight Length of rubber band (l i ) (with initial light weight at initial time) Initial time Mass of larger weight Length of rubber band (l t 1 ) (with larger weight) Time Length of rubber band (l t 2 ) (with larger weight at end time) End Time Final Length of rubber band (l f ) 3

TABLE B (rubber band 2) Type of Rubber Band Mass of initial light weight Length of rubber band (l i ) (with initial light weight at initial time) Initial time Mass of larger weight Length of rubber band (l t 1 ) (with larger weight) Time Length of rubber band (l t 2 ) (with larger weight at end time) End Time Final Length of rubber band (l f ) 4

Type of Rubber Band Weight TABLE C Observation 8. Using the given equation, calculate the strain applied to each rubber band tested. SHOW YOUR WORK and CIRCLE YOUR ANSWER! Rubber Band 1: Rubber Band 2: 5

9. Run the experiment again using the same rubber bands, but increase the amount of weight added. Record these results in Table D, Table E, and Table F. TABLE D (rubber band 3) Type of Rubber Band Mass of initial light weight Length of rubber band (l i ) (with initial light weight at initial time) Initial time Mass of larger weight Length of rubber band (l t 1 ) (with larger weight) Time Length of rubber band (l t 2 ) (with larger weight at end time) End Time Final Length of rubber band (l f ) 6

TABLE E (rubber band 4) Type of Rubber Band Mass of initial light weight Length of rubber band (l i ) (with initial light weight at initial time) Initial time Mass of larger weight Length of rubber band (l t 1 ) (with larger weight) Time Length of rubber band (l t 2 ) (with larger weight at end time) End Time Final Length of rubber band (l f ) 7

Type of Rubber Band Weight TABLE F Observation 10. Again, calculate the creep for the second set of rubber bands. SHOW YOUR WORK and CIRCLE YOUR ANSWER! Rubber band 3: Rubber band 4: 8

11. Plot your creep for each rubber band on the graph below and connect your data points with a smooth curve. Plot of creep strain versus time for the rubber bands stretched by varying weights. 9

Analysis Questions 1. Which type of rubber band had the largest creep? 2. Which type of weight caused the most creep? 3. Based on your lab results, were ALL of your hypotheses correct? 4. List some sources of error in your experiment. 5. Excluding the errors above, what changes would you make to the experiment in order to yield more accurate results? Explain your reasoning. 10

, n i a r t S! p e e r C 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 400 800 1200 1600 Time, t (minutes) Example data plot of creep strain versus time for the rubber bands stretched by varying weights. The red circles indicate 250g, the blue squares indicate 500g, and the green triangles indicate 696g over a 24 hour period. (Note: the dashed lines are not curve fits.) 11

Bar graph indicating the total creep strain versus weight for rubber bands after 24 hours. 12