Toric Varieties and Lattice Polytopes

Similar documents
Polytopes, Polynomials, and String Theory

Mirror, Mirror. String Theory and Pairs of Polyhedra. Ursula Whitcher. February Math Reviews & University of Wisconsin Eau Claire

Mirror Symmetry Through Reflexive Polytopes

An Abundance of K3 Fibrations from Polyhedra with Interchangeable Parts

TORIC VARIETIES JOAQUÍN MORAGA

From affine manifolds to complex manifolds: instanton corrections from tropical disks

Non-trivial Torus Equivariant Vector bundles of Rank Three on P

THE REFLEXIVE DIMENSION OF A LATTICE POLYTOPE

Classification of Reflexive Polyhedra in Three Dimensions

Fano varieties and polytopes

Classification of Reflexive Polyhedra in Three Dimensions

arxiv: v1 [math.ag] 29 May 2008

Faithful tropicalization of hypertoric varieties

Q-Gorenstein deformation families of Fano varieties or The combinatorics of Mirror Symmetry. Alexander Kasprzyk

Reflexive Polytopes and Lattice-Polarized K3 Surfaces

MATH 890 HOMEWORK 2 DAVID MEREDITH

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO. Toric Degenerations of Calabi-Yau Manifolds in Grassmannians

Graph Cohomology. Matthew Lin. Dagan Karp, Advisor. Satyan L. Devadoss, Reader. Department of Mathematics

arxiv: v2 [math.ag] 3 Dec 2017

arxiv:math/ v2 [math.ag] 18 Mar 2003

CREPANT RESOLUTIONS OF GORENSTEIN TORIC SINGULARITIES AND UPPER BOUND THEOREM. Dimitrios I. Dais

4. Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology

Classification of smooth Fano polytopes

Smooth Fano Polytopes Arising from Finite Partially Ordered Sets

RATIONAL CURVES ON SMOOTH CUBIC HYPERSURFACES. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. The proof of Theorem References 9

Combinatorial constructions of hyperbolic and Einstein four-manifolds

Weierstrass models of elliptic toric. K3 hypersurfaces and symplectic cuts

Lecture 0: Reivew of some basic material

6.2 Classification of Closed Surfaces

The exotic dodecahedron M 0,5 (R) David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris

arxiv: v1 [math.at] 8 Jan 2015

Cluster algebras and infinite associahedra

Boundary Curves of Incompressible Surfaces

Basics of Combinatorial Topology

Manifolds. Chapter X. 44. Locally Euclidean Spaces

Geometric structures on manifolds

PERIODS OF ALGEBRAIC VARIETIES

Discriminant Coamoebas in Dimension Three

Toric Cohomological Rigidity of Simple Convex Polytopes

4.2 Simplicial Homology Groups

TADEUSZ JANUSZKIEWICZ AND MICHAEL JOSWIG

FACES OF CONVEX SETS

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 25 Sep 2015

COMBINATORIAL METHODS IN ALGEBRAIC TOPOLOGY

Reflection groups 4. Mike Davis. May 19, Sao Paulo

Lecture 5: Simplicial Complex

Coxeter Groups and CAT(0) metrics

ON FAMILIES OF NESTOHEDRA

arxiv: v1 [cs.cc] 30 Jun 2017

Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four dimensions

L-CONVEX-CONCAVE SETS IN REAL PROJECTIVE SPACE AND L-DUALITY

Moduli spaces in genus zero and inversion of power series

Mutation-linear algebra and universal geometric cluster algebras

Chapter 4 Concepts from Geometry

Institutionen för matematik, KTH.

POLYTOPES. Grünbaum and Shephard [40] remarked that there were three developments which foreshadowed the modern theory of convex polytopes.

1. Complex Projective Surfaces

Regular polytopes with few flags

66 III Complexes. R p (r) }.

POLYHEDRAL GEOMETRY. Convex functions and sets. Mathematical Programming Niels Lauritzen Recall that a subset C R n is convex if

Discrete Mathematics SECOND EDITION OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS. Norman L. Biggs. Professor of Mathematics London School of Economics University of London

LECTURE 13, THURSDAY APRIL 1, 2004

Random Tropical Curves

LECTURE 1 Basic definitions, the intersection poset and the characteristic polynomial

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 9 Dec 2015

Noncrossing sets and a Graßmann associahedron

Lattice-point generating functions for free sums of polytopes

CS 372: Computational Geometry Lecture 10 Linear Programming in Fixed Dimension

Math 5593 Linear Programming Lecture Notes

Lecture 3A: Generalized associahedra

THE BASIC THEORY OF PERSISTENT HOMOLOGY

Arboreal Dessins D enfants David P. Roberts University of Minnesota, Morris. 2. Rational functions and moduli algebras

Homology of Simplicial Complexes

Polytopes Course Notes

SOCIAL CHOICE AMONG COMPLEX OBJECTS:MATHEMATICAL TOOLS

Final Test in MAT 410: Introduction to Topology Answers to the Test Questions

Geometric structures on manifolds

PERSISTENT HOMOLOGY OF FINITE TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

A TESSELLATION FOR ALGEBRAIC SURFACES IN CP 3

Geometric bistellar flips: the setting, the context and a construction

From String Theory to Elliptic Curves over Finite Field, F p

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 2 Apr 2007

Two Connections between Combinatorial and Differential Geometry

Monotone Paths in Geometric Triangulations

William P. Thurston. The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds

Introduction to Coxeter Groups

CS675: Convex and Combinatorial Optimization Spring 2018 The Simplex Algorithm. Instructor: Shaddin Dughmi

Dale Husemoller. Elliptic Curves. Second Edition. With Appendices by Otto Forster, Ruth Lawrence, and Stefan Theisen. With 42 Illustrations.

Geometric structures on 2-orbifolds

Surfaces Beyond Classification

Convex Sets. CSCI5254: Convex Optimization & Its Applications. subspaces, affine sets, and convex sets. operations that preserve convexity

DM545 Linear and Integer Programming. Lecture 2. The Simplex Method. Marco Chiarandini

A PROOF OF THE LOWER BOUND CONJECTURE FOR CONVEX POLYTOPES

Lecture 5 CLASSIFICATION OF SURFACES

Combinatorial Geometry & Topology arising in Game Theory and Optimization

arxiv: v1 [math.co] 15 Dec 2009

When do the Recession Cones of a Polyhedral Complex Form a Fan?

Wedge operation and torus symmetries

SPERNER S LEMMA, BROUWER S FIXED-POINT THEOREM, AND THE SUBDIVISION OF SQUARES INTO TRIANGLES

CS 473: Algorithms. Ruta Mehta. Spring University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Ruta (UIUC) CS473 1 Spring / 36

Transcription:

Toric Varieties and Lattice Polytopes Ursula Whitcher April 1, 006 1 Introduction We will show how to construct spaces called toric varieties from lattice polytopes. Toric fibrations correspond to slices of the polytope, and the Dynkin diagrams of singularities will appear in the lattice polytope. This process has been used to study K3 surfaces and higher-dimensional Calabi-Yau manifolds. Building Toric Varieties We will construct an algebro-geometric space based on combinatorial data. construction of complex projective space P n. This process generalizes the.1 Cones, Fans, and Polytopes We begin with a lattice N isomorphic to Z n. The dual lattice M of N is given by Hom(N, Z); it is also isomorphic to Z n. (The alphabet may appear to be going backwards; but this notation is standard in the literature.) We write the pairing of v N and w M as v, w. A cone in N is a subset of the real vector space N R = N R generated by nonnegative R-linear combinations of a set of vectors {v 1,..., v n } N. We assume that cones are strongly convex, that is, they contain no line through the origin. Note that each face of a cone is a cone. (Strictly speaking, our cones in N are strongly convex rational polyhedral cones.) Any cone σ in N has a dual cone σ in M given by {w M R v, w 0 v σ}. A fan consists of a finite collection of cones such that each face of a cone in the fan is also in the fan, and any pair of cones in the fan intersects in a common face. Note the analogy to simplicial complexes. A (convex) polytope in a finite-dimensional vector space is the convex hull of a finite set of points. We are interested in lattice polytopes, for which this finite set of points the polytope s vertices are contained in our integer lattice. Given a lattice polytope in N containing 0, we may construct a fan by taking cones over each face of the polytope. Given a lattice polytope K in N, we define its polar polytope K 0 to be K 0 = {w M v, w 1 v K}. If K 0 is also a lattice polytope, we say that K is a reflexive polytope and that K and K 0 are a mirror pair. Example 1. The generalized octahedron in N with vertices at (±1, 0,..., 0), (0, ±1,..., 0),..., (0, 0,..., ±1) has the hypercube with vertices at (±1, ±1,..., ±1) as its polar. A reflexive polytope must contain 0; furthermore, 0 is the only interior lattice point of the polytope. Thus, if we have a reflexive polytope, we may construct a fan by taking every lattice point of the polytope as a generator. This gives us a refinement of the fan constructed by cones over the polytope s faces.. The Toric Variety..1 Varieties from Cones From a cone σ in N, we may obtain a complex affine variety (that is, the common vanishing set of a finite set of complex polynomials {f 1,..., f j } in m variables in C m ) according to the following procedure. Let S σ be the commutative semigroup σ M (S σ is closed under the semigroup operation of addition and contains an 1

identity element 0, but does not contain additive inverses). Then C[S σ ], finite formal linear combinations of elements of S σ with coefficients in C, is a finitely generated commutative C-algebra. If you have studied enough algebraic geometry, you know that this sort of algebra corresponds to an affine variety U σ = Spec(C[S σ ]), and that C[S σ ] can be viewed as the regular functions on this variety. In our case, the correspondence is quite simple: if we can find an isomorphism between C[S σ ] and C[X 1,..., X m ]/{f 1,..., f j }, then we know U σ is isomorphic to the common vanishing set of the {f 1,..., f j }. Example. Let e 1,..., e n be basis vectors for N, and suppose e 1,..., e n generate σ. Then the dual basis e 1,..., e n generates S σ, so C[S σ ] = C[X 1,..., X n ] = C[X 1,..., X n ]/{0}. Thus U σ = Z({0}), that is, C n. Example 3. Let n = and let σ be generated by e 1 and e 1 + e. Then σ is generated by e and e 1 e. S σ has e 1, e, and e 1 e as generators, so C[S σ ] = C[X, Y, X Y 1 ] = C[U, V, W ]/(U V W ). Example 4. Let σ be {0}. Then S σ is all of M. As a semigroup, S σ has generators e 1,..., e n, e 1,..., e n. Thus C[S σ ] = C[X 1,..., X n, X1 1,..., X 1 n ]. If we think of C[S σ ] as algebraic functions on U σ, then we see that each element defines a function on the points of C n whose coordinates are all nonzero; thus, U σ = (C ) n, the complex torus... Varieties from Fans Each cone in a fan gives us an affine variety. We may obtain a cone from a fan by gluing these affine varieties together along the open sets corresponding to shared faces. Example 5. Let n = 1 and let Σ be the fan containing the cones {0}, the non-negative real numbers, and the non-positive real numbers. These cones correspond to rings C[X 1, X1 1 ], C[X 1], and C[X1 1 ], respectively; the corresponding varieties are C, C, and C. Gluing the two copies of C along C via the map x 1/x, we obtain the complex projective space P 1. This gluing construction gives us a covering of our variety by affine charts. Alternatively, we may obtain global homogeneous coordinates for our space, in a process analogous to the construction of P n as a quotient space of (C ) n. Let Σ be a fan in N, and let v 1,..., v q be generators of the one-dimensional cones of N. We assume that Σ is simplicial; the general case is slightly more complicated. Let Z Σ C q be the set I {(z 1,..., z q ) z i = 0 i I}, where the index I ranges over all sets I {1,..., q} such that {v i i I} is not a cone in Σ. Our variety is given by (C \ Z Σ )/, where the equivalence relation is as follows: (z 1,..., z q ) (λ a1 j z1,..., λ aq j zq ) if k a k j v k = 0. Here λ C and a k j Z+ ; there are q n independent sets of relations {a 1 j,..., aq j }. Example 6. Let n =, let e 1 and e be generators of N, and let be the polytope with vertices e 1, e, and e 1 e. Let Σ be the fan obtained by taking cones on the faces of. Then the generators of the one-dimensional cones of Σ are just e 1, e, and e 1 e. Any two of these generators belong to a cone in Σ, so Z Σ is {(0, 0, 0)}. We have exactly one relation, e 1 + e + ( e1 e) = 0, where the weights are all 1. Thus, V Σ is simply P with the usual homogeneous coordinates. Example 7. Let n = and let be the polytope with vertices e 1, e 1, e, and e. Again, let Σ be the fan obtained by taking cones on the faces of, so the generators of the one-dimensional cones of Σ are e 1, e 1, e, and e. The generators e 1 and e 1 do not belong to a common cone Σ; neither do e and e. Furthermore, no set of three or four one-dimensional generators can span a cone in Σ. Thus, Z Σ = {(0, 0, 0, 0)} {(z 1, z, 0, 0)} {(0, 0, z 3, z 4 )} {(z 1, 0, 0, 0)} {(0, z, 0, 0)} {(0, 0, z 3, 0)} {(0, 0, 0, z 4 )}. We have 4 = independent relations, e 1 + e 1 = 0 and e + e = 0. This yields the following equivalence relations: (z 1, z, z 3, z 4 ) (λz 1, λz, z 3, z 4 ) and where λ C. Thus, V Σ is isomorphic to P 1 P 1. (z 1, z, λz 3, λz 4 ) (z 1, z, z 3, z 4 ),

.3 Refining Fans If Σ and T are fans such that the cones in Σ are a subset of the cones in T, we say that T is a refinement of Σ. Refinements of fans correspond to birational maps between their corresponding varieties. Example 8. Let n =, and Σ be the fan containing the cone σ generated by e 1 and e and its faces. Let T be the fan containing σ, the cone τ generated by e 1 and e 1 + e, the cone υ generated by e and e 1 + e, and their faces. As we have already seen, V Σ is C. C[S τ ] = C[Y, XY 1 ] and C[S υ ] = C[Y, XY 1 ]. These affine sets glue to give us the blow-up of C at 0. If we construct a fan by taking cones over the faces of a reflexive polytope, the non-vertex points of the polytope correspond to singularities which could be removed by refining the fan that is, blowing up. 3 Subspaces and Fibrations We have already seen that faces of cones correspond to open subspaces of our variety. We would like to use our fan to construct closed subspaces. 3.1 Orbit Closures Let Σ be a fan and let τ be a k-dimensional cone in Σ. Let N τ be the sublattice generated as a group by τ N, and let N(τ) be the quotient lattice N/N τ. The star of τ is the set of cones in Σ which have τ as a face. The image of these cones in N(τ) is a fan in N(τ); we call this fan Star(τ). Star(τ) defines an n k-dimensional variety V(τ). V(τ) is covered by open affine charts corresponding to the cones in the star of τ. We embed V(τ) in the toric variety V Σ by constructing compatible closed embeddings for each chart. We illustrate this process by example. Example 9. Let be the polytope in N = Z with vertices e 1, e, and e 1 e, and let Σ be the fan obtained by taking the cones on the faces of. We have already shown that the variety V Σ is P. Let τ be the cone in Σ generated by e 1. Then N τ = τ N and N(τ) = N/N τ are both isomorphic to Z. Star(τ) is a fan in N(τ) with one cone for each of the two cones in Σ containing τ. We have seen this fan before; it is the fan corresponding to P 1. We must determine the correct way to embed this P 1 in P. We will do so explicitly for just one chart; the others follow similarly. Let σ be the cone in Σ generated by e 1 and e. Then σ is generated by the dual generators e 1 and e. The image σ of σ in Star(τ) is generated by ē, the image of e in N(τ). We may write C[S σ ] as C[X, Y ], and C[S σ] as C[Y ]. The map of C-algebras from C[X, Y ] to C[Y ] induced by X 0 induces a map of varieties from C to C given by z (0, z). Thus, the embedding of P 1 in P described by τ is just the map in homogeneous coordinates (z 1, z ) (0, z 1, z ). 3. Polynomials in Global Coordinates We may describe closed hypersurfaces in P n by taking the vanishing sets of homogeneous polynomials. Similarly, if we view points in a toric variety in their global homogeneous coordinates (z 1,..., z q ), we may obtain closed hypersurfaces by taking the vanishing sets of appropriate polynomials in the z i. In particular, if is a reflexive polytope and Σ is a fan obtained from a lattice triangulation of the faces of, then the zero set of the following polynomial describes a Calabi-Yau hypersurface in the variety V Σ : p = x 0 M c x n k=1 z v k,x +1 k. (As before, the v k are generators of the one-dimensional cones of Σ; we may also view them as lattice points in the triangulation of.) Example 10. Let n = and let be the polytope with vertices e 1, e 1, e, and e ; let Σ be the fan obtained by taking cones on the faces of. The polar polytope 0 is a square with vertices e 1 + e, e 1 e, 3

e 1 + e, and e 1 e ; it has nine lattice points. Thus, the polynomial p will have nine terms; for instance, the term corresponding to the lattice point e is a e z1 0+1 z 0+1 z3 1+1 z4 1+1 = a e z 1 z z3. 3.3 Fibrations Let be a reflexive polytope in N, and let Σ be a fan obtained from a triangulation of. Suppose there exists an n -dimensional linear subspace N fiber of N such that N fiber is an n -dimensional reflexive polytope with 0 as its unique interior point. Then we may construct an exact sequence 0 N fiber N N base. If the image Σ base of Σ in the lattice N base is a fan, this sequence yields a fibration of V Σ : the generic fiber corresponds to the polytope N fiber, and the base is given by Σ base. In particular, if n = n 1, then N fiber is a hyperplane determined by a vector m fiber M, and the base space of the fibration is P 1. Homogeneous coordinates for this base space are given by (z up, z down ), where z up = i: v i,m fiber >0 z vi,m fiber i and z down = i: v i,m fiber <0 z vi,m fiber i. Example 11. Let n = and let be the polytope with vertices e 1, e 1, e, and e. As we saw in a previous example, this polytope yields the toric variety P 1 P 1 with coordinates (z 1, z, z 3, z 4 ) corresponding to the one-dimensional generators e 1, e 1, e, and e, respectively. If we intersect with the hyperplane generated by e 1, we obtain a one-dimensional reflexive polytope with vertices e 1 and e 1 ; this polytope corresponds to P 1, so our fiber is P 1. The hyperplane generated by e 1 is determined by m fiber = e 0. Then z up and z down are just z 3 and z 4 respectively, so our base P 1 has coordinates (z 3, z 4 ) and the projection map from P 1 P 1 to the base P 1 is given by (z 1, z, z 3, z 4 ) (z 3, z 4 ). 4 K3 Surfaces and Intersecting Divisors A suitably generic K3 surface in a toric variety described by a three-dimensional reflexive polytope with a two-dimensional reflexive polygon slice will inherit an elliptic fibration structure from the fibration on the toric variety. In the orbit closure construction, we saw that a one-dimensional cone τ in a fan Σ corresponds to an n 1-dimensional variety V(τ) embedded in V Σ. If Σ is obtained from our maximally triangulated reflexive polytope, then each nonzero lattice point v i in corresponds to a one-dimensional cone τ i and thus to a two-complex-dimensional embedded variety D i. These varieties represent homology classes in H 4 (V Σ ). If our K3 surface is sufficiently generic, its intersection with each of these varieties will be a hypersurface in the K3, generating a homology class in H (K3). We are interested in the intersection pairing on these hypersurfaces. We may try to determine the values of this pairing by taking triple intersections D i D j K3 in V Σ. It turns out that [K3] = [ i D i] in H 4 (V Σ ), so we may reduce the problem to considering triple intersections of the D i. If D i D j K3 is to have a nontrivial intersection, Star(τ i ) and Star(τ j ) must intersect somewhere other than the origin, so v i and v j must be adjacent in the triangulation of. Further calculations show that D i D j K3 is nonzero if and only if v i and v j are neighbors along a face of. Intersection pairings of divisors correspond to the ADE classification of singularities obtained by blowing down these divisors. In our case, the correspondence is particularly simple: if we blow down all of the divisors aside from the divisors D fiber and D section corresponding to our fibration and a section of the fibration, we may read the Dynkin diagrams of the singularities from the edge diagrams in our polytope above and below the two-dimensional slice! 4

References [1] A. C. Avram, M. Kreuzer, M. Mandelberg and H. Skarke, Searching for K3 Fibrations, hep-th/9610154 v1, 0 October 1996. [] Adrian Clingher and Charles Doran, Modular Invariants for Lattice Polarized K3 Surfaces (preliminary version), 5 November 005. [3] William Fulton, Introduction to Toric Varieties, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993. [4] Maximilian Kreuzer and Harold Skarke, Calabi-Yau Fourfolds and Toric Fibrations, hep-th 9701175 v1, 9 January 1997. [5] Eugene Perevalov and Harald Skarke, Enhanced Gauge Symmetry in Type II and F-Theory Compactifications: Dynkin Diagrams from Polyhedra, hep-th/970419 v, 1 May 1997. 5