GENERALIZED MINIMAL HOMEOMORPHISM MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACE

Similar documents
Functions Related To β* - Closed Sets in Topological Spaces

Semi # generalized closed sets in Topological Spaces S.Saranya 1 and Dr.K.Bageerathi 2

On Semi Pre Generalized -Closed Sets in Topological Spaces

On Fuzzy *µ - Irresolute Maps and Fuzzy *µ - Homeomorphism Mappings in Fuzzy Topological Spaces

ScienceDirect. -IRRESOLUTE MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES K. Kannan a, N. Nagaveni b And S. Saranya c a & c

Notes on Interval Valued Fuzzy RW-Closed, Interval Valued Fuzzy RW-Open Sets in Interval Valued Fuzzy Topological Spaces

On Generalized Regular Closed Sets

sb -closed sets in Topological spaces

Address for Correspondence Department of Science and Humanities, Karpagam College of Engineering, Coimbatore -32, India

International Journal of Mathematical Archive-4(2), 2013, Available online through ISSN

ON SUPRA G*BΩ - CLOSED SETS IN SUPRA TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

IJESRT. Scientific Journal Impact Factor: (ISRA), Impact Factor: 2.114

scl(a) G whenever A G and G is open in X. I. INTRODUCTION

On Pre Generalized Pre Regular Weakly Open Sets and Pre Generalized Pre Regular Weakly Neighbourhoods in Topological Spaces

ON WEAKLY πg-closed SETS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

On Binary Generalized Topological Spaces

Some Properties of Soft -Open Sets in Soft Topological Space

Soft regular generalized b-closed sets in soft topological spaces

On Fuzzy Supra Boundary and Fuzzy Supra Semi Boundary

Fuzzy Generalized γ-closed set in Fuzzy Topological Space

On Fuzzy Topological Spaces Involving Boolean Algebraic Structures

Some Types of Regularity and Normality Axioms in ech Fuzzy Soft Closure Spaces

Nano Generalized Pre Homeomorphisms in Nano Topological Space

Journal of Babylon University/Pure and Applied Sciences/ No.(1)/ Vol.(21): 2013

On Generalized Pre Regular Weakly (gprw)-closed Sets in Topological Spaces

Soft Regular Generalized Closed Sets in Soft Topological Spaces

SOFT GENERALIZED CLOSED SETS IN SOFT TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

δ(δg) * -Closed sets in Topological Spaces

(i, j)-almost Continuity and (i, j)-weakly Continuity in Fuzzy Bitopological Spaces

On α Generalized Closed Sets In Ideal Topological Spaces

FUZZY SET GO- SUPER CONNECTED MAPPINGS

New Classes of Closed Sets tgr-closed Sets and t gr-closed Sets

A Note on Fuzzy Boundary of Fuzzy Bitopological Spaces on the Basis of Reference Function

ON INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY SUPRA PRE-OPEN SET AND INTUTIONISTIC FUZZY SUPRA-P RE-CONTINUITY ON TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

ON BINARY TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

Soft Pre Generalized - Closed Sets in a Soft Topological Space

Compactness in Countable Fuzzy Topological Space

TOWARDS FORMING THE FIELD OF FUZZY CLOSURE WITH REFERENCE TO FUZZY BOUNDARY

Fuzzy Regular Generalized Super Closed Set

DENSE SETS, NOWHERE DENSE SETS AND AN IDEAL IN GENERALIZED CLOSURE SPACES. Chandan Chattopadhyay. 1. Introduction

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Contra λ-continuous Mappings

Jessie Theodore and V. Beulah. Department of Mathematics, Sarah Tucker College, Tirunelveli, India. Abstract

On Fuzzy Regular Generalized Weakly Closed Sets In Fuzzy Topological Space

- Closed Sets in Strong Generalized Topological Spaces

Lecture 17: Continuous Functions

DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES

Rough Connected Topologized. Approximation Spaces

BOUNDARY AND EXTERIOR OF A MULTISET TOPOLOGY

On Soft Topological Linear Spaces

Journal of Asian Scientific Research WEAK SEPARATION AXIOMS VIA OPEN SET AND CLOSURE OPERATOR. Mustafa. H. Hadi. Luay. A. Al-Swidi

On Generalized PreSemi Closed Sets in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topological Spaces

Generalized Semipre Regular Closed Sets in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Topological Spaces

ON DECOMPOSITION OF FUZZY BԐ OPEN SETS

On Separation Axioms in Soft Minimal Spaces

Intuitionistic Fuzzy γ Supra Open Mappings And Intuitionistic Fuzzy γ Supra Closed Mappings

IJESRT INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY FUZZY SUPRA β-open SETS J.Srikiruthika *, A.

Product Cordial Labeling for Some New Graphs

Point-Set Topology II

Intuitionistic Fuzzy g # Closed Sets

Milby Mathew. Karpagam University Coimbatore-32, India. R. Parimelazhagan

Some new higher separation axioms via sets having non-empty interior

Saturated Sets in Fuzzy Topological Spaces

TOPOLOGY, DR. BLOCK, FALL 2015, NOTES, PART 3.

Study on Feebly Open Set with Respect to an Ideal Topological Spaces

SOME REMARKS CONCERNING D METRIC SPACES

A NOTE ON SEMITOPOLOGICAL PROPERTIES. D. Sivaraj

International Journal of Mathematical Archive-6(1), 2015, Available online through ISSN

Topology Between Two Sets

Some Properties of θ-open Sets

2.8. Connectedness A topological space X is said to be disconnected if X is the disjoint union of two non-empty open subsets. The space X is said to

On Sequential Topogenic Graphs

Generalised Closed Sets in Multiset Topological Space

Fuzzy (r,s)-totally Semi-Continuous and Fuzzy (r,s)-semi Totally- Continuous Mappings in Sostak s Sense

Some Cordial Labeling of Duplicate Graph of Ladder Graph

Generalized (ST, PT)-Supra Closed Set In Bi-Supra Topological Space

On the Wiener Index of Some Edge Deleted Graphs

International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences and Technology

Soft ˆ- Generalized Closed Sets and Soft ˆ - Generalized Open Sets in Soft Topological Spaces

On Soft Almost Paracompactness in Soft Topological Space

REPRESENTATION OF DISTRIBUTIVE LATTICES BY MEANS OF ORDERED STONE SPACES

On αrω-homeomorphisms in Topological Spaces

Rough Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in a Lattice

The Further Mathematics Support Programme

Some Properties of Intuitionistic. (T, S)-Fuzzy Filters on. Lattice Implication Algebras

Lecture : Topological Space

On Chaotic Properties of Convergent Sequences Maps on -space

ISSN X (print) COMPACTNESS OF S(n)-CLOSED SPACES

On Some Properties of Vague Lattices

Signed Product Cordial labeling in duplicate graphs of Bistar, Double Star and Triangular Ladder Graph

The Number of Fuzzy Subgroups of Cuboid Group

Fuzzy Pre-semi-closed Sets

SOFT INTERVAL VALUED INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SEMI-PRE GENERALIZED CLOSED SETS

REDUNDANCY OF MULTISET TOPOLOGICAL SPACES

1. Introduction. 2. Preliminaries

Prime Labeling for Some Cycle Related Graphs

T. Background material: Topology

Homework Set #2 Math 440 Topology Topology by J. Munkres

Fixed points of Kannan mappings in metric spaces endowed with a graph

Vague Congruence Relation Induced by VLI Ideals of Lattice Implication Algebras

Epimorphisms in the Category of Hausdorff Fuzzy Topological Spaces

Transcription:

GENERALIZED MINIMAL HOMEOMORPHISM MAPS IN TOPOLOGICAL SPACE Suwarnlatha N. Banasode 1 Mandakini A.Desurkar 2 1 Department of Mathematics, K.L.E. Society s, R.L.Science Institute, Belgaum - 590001. 2 Department of Mathematics, K.L.E. Dr M S Sheshgiri College of Engg. &Tech.,Belgaum-590008. ABSTRACT: In this paper generalized minimal closed maps that include a class of generalized minimal homeomorphisms and generalized minimal homeomorphisms are introduced and studied in topological spaces. A bijective mapping : (X, ) (Y, ), is said to be generalized minimal homeomorphism (briefly g- m i homeomorphism) if and are g-m i continuous maps. Mathematics Subject Classification: 54A05, 54C10. Keywords : g-m i irresolute, generalized minimal homeomorphism, g-m a open maps, g-m i closed maps 1.INTRODUCTION AND PRELIMINARIES In 1970 N. Levine [2] introduced generalized closed (g-closed) sets in topological spaces in order to extend many of the important properties of closed sets to a larger family. Further study of g- closed sets in topological spaces was continued by W. Dunham and N. Levine [1]. Recently minimal open sets and maximal open sets in topological spaces were introduced and studied by F. Nakaoka and N. Oda ([5], [6] and [7]).In 1982, S. R. Malghan[4] introduced generalized closed maps in topological spaces and investigated some of their properties. H. Maki, P. Sundaram and K. Balachandra[3] studied g-open maps and g-homoeomorphisms respectively. Further Suwarnlatha Banasode and Mandakini Desurkar [8] studied generalized minimal continuous maps in topological spaces. 208 Suwarnlatha N. Banasode, Mandakini A.Desurkar

Section 2 is a brief study of generalized minimal homeomorphisms and generalized minimal homeomorphisms in topological spaces. Throughout this paper (X, ), (Y, ) and (Z, ) denote topological spaces on which no separation axioms are assumed unless otherwise explicitly mentioned. For any subset A of a topological space (X, ), closure of A, interior of A and complement of A is denoted by cl(a), int(a) and A c respectively. We recall the following definitions, which are prerequisites for our present study. Definition 1.1: A proper nonempty subset A of a topological space (X, ) is called (i) a minimal open [5] (resp. minimal closed [7]) set if any open (resp. closed) subset of X which is contained in A, is either A or. (ii) a maximal open [6] (resp. maximal closed)[7]) set if any open (resp. closed) subset of X which contains A, is either A or X. Remark1.2 [7]: Minimal open (resp. minimal closed) sets and maximal closed (resp. maximal open) sets are complements of each other. Definition 1.3[2]: A subset A of a topological space (X, ) is called (i) a generalized closed[1] (briefly g-closed) set if cl (A) U whenever A U and U is an open set in X. (ii) a generalized open (briefly g-open ) set [1] iff A c is a g-closed set. Definition 1.4: A mapping : (X, ) (Y, ) is said to be (i) generalized closed (g-closed) map [4] if the image of every closed set in X is g-closed set in Y. (ii) minimal open (resp. minimal closed) map if the image of every minimal open (resp. minimal closed) set in X is an open (resp. closed) set in Y. (iii)maximal open (resp.maximal closed) map if the image of every maximal open (resp. maximal closed) set in X is an open (resp. closed) set in Y. (iv) strongly minimal open (resp.strongly minimal closed) map if the image of every minimal open (resp. minimal closed) set in X is minimal open (resp. minimal closed) set in Y. (v) strongly maximal open (resp.strongly maximal closed) map if the image of every maximal open (resp. maximal closed) set in X is maximal open (resp. maximal closed) set in Y. (vi) minimal generalized open (resp. minimal generalized closed) map if the image of every minimal open (resp. minimal closed) set in X is g-open (resp. g-closed) set in Y. 209 Suwarnlatha N. Banasode, Mandakini A.Desurkar

(vii) maximal generalized open (resp.maximal generalized closed) map if the image of every maximal open (resp. maximal closed) set in X is g- open (resp.g- closed) set in Y. Definition 1.5: A bijective mapping : (X, ) (Y, ) is said to be (i) generalized homeomorphism [3] if is g-continuous and g-open. (ii) gc-homeomorphism [3] if and are gc-irresolute maps. (iii) minimal g-homeomorphism (resp. maximal g-homeomorphism) if is minimal g-continuous (resp. maximal g-continuous) and minimal g-open (resp.maximal g-open). Definition 2.1: A bijective mapping : (X, ) (Y, ), is said to be generalized minimal homeomorphism (briefly g- m i homeomorphism) if and are g-m i continuous maps. Theorem 2.2: If : (X, ) (Y, ) is a bijective map, then the following statements are equivalent. (i) Its inverse map : (Y, ) (X, ) is g-m i continuous. (ii) is a g-m a open map. (iii) is a g-m i closed map. Proof: (i) (ii). Let V be any maximal open set in X, so that V c is a minimal closed set in X. From (i) ( ) (V c ) = (V c ) = ( (V)) c is a g-minimal closed set in Y, so that (V) is a g-maximal open set in Y. Therefore is a g-m a open map. (ii) (iii). Let U be any minimal closed set in X, so that U c is a maximal open set in X. From (ii) (U c ) = ( (U)) c is a g-maximal open set in Y, so that (U) is a g-minimal closed set in Y. Therefore is a g-m i closed map. (iii) (i). Let U be any minimal closed set in X. From (iii) (U) is a g-minimal closed set in Y, so that ( ) (U) is a g-minimal closed set in Y. Therefore the inverse map : (Y, ) (X, ) is g-m i continuous map. Theorem 2.3: If : (X, ) (Y, ) is a bijective map and g-minimal continuous map, then the following statements are equivalent. (i) is a g-m a open map. (ii) is a g- m i homeomorphism. (iii) is a g-m i closed map. 210 Suwarnlatha N. Banasode, Mandakini A.Desurkar

Proof: (i) (ii). Let U be a minimal closed set in X, so that U c is a maximal open set in X. From (i) (U c ) = ( (U)) c is a g-maximal open set in Y, so that (U) = ( ) (U) is g-minimal closed set in Y. Therefore : (Y, ) (X, ) is g-m i continuous map. Hence is a g- m i homeomorphism. (ii) (iii). Let U be any minimal closed set in X. From (ii) ( ) (U) is a g-minimal closed set in Y, (U) is a g-minimal closed set in Y. Therefore is a g-m i closed map. (iii) (i). Let V be any maximal open set in X, so that V c is a minimal closed set in X. From (iii) (V c ) = ( (V)) c is a g-minimal closed set in Y, so that (V) is a g-maximal open set in Y. Therefore is a g-m a open map. Definition 2.4: A bijective mapping : (X, ) (Y, ), is said to be generalized minimal homeomorphism (briefly g- m i homeomorphism) if and are g-m i irresolute maps. Theorem 2.5: If : (X, ) (Y, ) is a bijective map, then the following statements are equivalent. (i) Its inverse map : (Y, ) (X, ) is g-m i irresolute. (ii) is a g-m a open map. (iii) is a g-m i closed map. Proof: (i) (ii). Let V be any g-maximal open set in X, then V c is a g-minimal closed set in X. From (i) ( ) (V c ) = (V c ) = ( (V)) c is a g-minimal closed set in Y, so that (V) is a g-maximal open set in Y. Therefore is a g-m a open map. (ii) (iii).let U be any g-minimal closed set in X, so that U c is a g-maximal open set in X. From (ii) (U c ) = ( (U)) c is a g-maximal open set in Y, so that (U) is a g-minimal closed set in Y. Therefore is a g-m i closed map. (iii) (i). Let U be any g-minimal closed set in X. From (iii) (U) is a g-minimal closed set in Y, so that ( ) (U) is a g-minimal closed set in Y. Therefore the inverse map : (Y, ) (X, ) is g-m i irresolute map. Theorem 2.6: If : (X, ) (Y, ) is a bijective map and g-minimal irresolute map, then the following statements are equivalent. (i) is a g-m a open map. (ii) is a g- m i homeomorphism. (iii) is a g-m i closed map. Proof: Similar to the proof of the Theorem 2.3. 211 Suwarnlatha N. Banasode, Mandakini A.Desurkar

Theorem 2.7: If : (X, ) (Y, ) and h: (Y, ) (Z, ) are g- m i homeomorphisms, then h o : (X, ) (Z, ) is g- m i homeomorphism. Proof:Let U be any g-m i closed set in Z.Since h is g- m i homeomorphism, h (U) is a g-m i closed set in Y. But : (X, ) (Y, ) g- m i homeomorphism. Therefore [h (U)] = (h o ) (U) is a g-m i closed set in X. Hence h o : (X, ) (Z, ) is a g-m i irresolute map. Again let V be any g-m i closed set in X. Since is a g- m i homeomorphism, (V) = ( ) (V) is a g-m i closed set in Y. But h: (Y, ) (Z, ) is a g- m i homeomorphism. Therefore [(h ) ( ) ](V) = [(h ) o ( ) ](V) is a g-mi closed set in Z. That is [( o h ) ](V)] = [ (h o ) ] (V) is a g-m i closed set in Z.It follows that (h o ) is g-m i irresolute. Hence h o : (X, ) (Z, ) is g- m i homeomorphism REFERENCES [1] W. Dunham and N. Levine, Further results on generalized closed sets in topology. Kyungpook Math. J. 20, No 2,December 1980.169-175. [2] N. Levine, Generalized closed sets in topology.rendiconti del Circ.Math. di Palermo, Vol. 19(1970), 89-96. Amer. Math. Monthly, 70 (1963), 36 41. [3] H. Maki, P. Sundaram and K. Balachandran. On generalized homeomorphisms in topological spaces, Bull. of Fukuoka Univ. of Edu. 40 (1991), 13 21. [4] S. R. Malghan, Generalized closed maps, J.Karnatak Univ. Sci. 27(1982), 82-88. [5] F. Nakaoka and N. Oda. Some Applications of Minimal Open Sets, Int.J. Math. Math. Sci. Vol. 27, No. 8, (2001) 471-476. [6] F. Nakaoka and N. Oda. Some Properties of Maximal open Sets, Int.J. Math. Math. Sci. Vol. (2003) 1331-1340. [7] F. Nakaoka and N. Oda. On Minimal Closed Sets. Proceedings of topological spaces theory and its applications, 5 (2003), 19 21. [8] Suwarnlatha Banasode and Mandakini Desurkar. Generalized Minimal Continuous Maps In Topological Spaces, International Research Journal of Pure Algebra, 4(12) (2014) 644-647. 212 Suwarnlatha N. Banasode, Mandakini A.Desurkar