Broadcasting Techniques for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Similar documents
Comparison of Broadcasting Techniques for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen Lehrstuhl für Informatik IV Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Otto Spaniol

Improved Performance of Mobile Adhoc Network through Efficient Broadcasting Technique

Impact of Node Velocity and Density on Probabilistic Flooding and its Effectiveness in MANET

Research Paper GNANAMANOHARAN ET AL., INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY E-ISSN

Probabilistic Mechanism to Avoid Broadcast Storm Problem in MANETS

Arvind Krishnamurthy Fall 2003

GATEWAY MULTIPOINT RELAYS AN MPR-BASED BROADCAST ALGORITHM FOR AD HOC NETWORKS. Ou Liang, Y. Ahmet Şekercioğlu, Nallasamy Mani

Routing Protocols in MANETs

Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks PROF. MICHAEL TSAI / DR. KATE LIN 2014/05/14

Reliable and Efficient Broadcasting in Asymmetric Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Using Minimized Forward Node List Algorithm

Lecture 6: Vehicular Computing and Networking. Cristian Borcea Department of Computer Science NJIT

Unicast Routing in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Dr. Ashikur Rahman CSE 6811: Wireless Ad hoc Networks

Reducing Routing Overhead For Multimedia Traffic in Manet Using Rebroadcast Probability

Crucial Video Scattering with QoS above Wireless Network by Selective Repeat Algorithm

A NEW DENSITY BASED PROBABILISTIC COUNTER SCHEME FOR SOLVING BROADCAST STORM IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS

A Novel Rebroadcast Technique for Reducing Routing Overhead In Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

A SURVEY OF ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS

Ad Hoc Routing. Ad-hoc Routing. Problems Using DV or LS. DSR Concepts. DSR Components. Proposed Protocols

Localized Broadcasting in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Using Neighbor Designation

A Generic Distributed Broadcast Scheme in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

WIRELESS MESH NETWORKS CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT USING CBF

Performance Comparison Based On Broadcasting Technique In Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Urvish R. Patel 1 Ridhdhi I. Satoniya 2 Satish G.

A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols. Broch et al Presented by Brian Card

Outline. CS5984 Mobile Computing. Taxonomy of Routing Protocols AODV 1/2. Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid. Routing Protocols in MANETs Part I

Glasgow eprints Service

Modified Ultra Smart Counter Based Broadcast Using Neighborhood Information in MANETS

Improved Self-Pruning for Broadcasting in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

Efficient Broadcasting in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Using Directional Antennas

Efficient Broadcast Algorithms To Reduce number of transmission Based on Probability Scheme

Performance Comparison of AODV, DSR, DSDV and OLSR MANET Routing Protocols

Fountain Codes with XOR of Encoded Packets for Broadcasting and source independent backbone in Multi-hop Networks using Network Coding

CS 268: Computer Networking. Taking Advantage of Broadcast

A Neighbor Coverage Based Probabilistic Rebroadcast Reducing Routing Overhead in MANETs

A Reliable Broadcast Algorithm with Selected Acknowledgements in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Reduction of Routing Overhead and Cross Talk Avoidance in MANETs through a Neighbour Coverage Based Probabilistic Rebroadcast

IN a mobile ad hoc network, nodes move arbitrarily.

Mobile & Wireless Networking. Lecture 10: Mobile Transport Layer & Ad Hoc Networks. [Schiller, Section 8.3 & Section 9] [Reader, Part 8]

3. Evaluation of Selected Tree and Mesh based Routing Protocols

Fuzzy-Logic Based Probabilistic Broadcasting Technique for Mobile Adhoc Networks

Broadcast algorithms for Active Safety Applications over Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks

LECTURE 9. Ad hoc Networks and Routing

A Protocol for Reducing Routing Overhead in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Reducing Routing Overhead In Manet Using Ncpr Protocol

Competent Broadcasting in MANET

Vaibhav Jain 2, Pawan kumar 3 2,3 Assistant Professor, ECE Deptt. Vaish College of Engineering, Rohtak, India. Rohtak, India

ICS 351: Today's plan. distance-vector routing game link-state routing OSPF

Mobile Communications. Ad-hoc and Mesh Networks

CS5984 Mobile Computing

CMPE 257: Wireless and Mobile Networking

AN ADAPTIVE GATEWAY DISCOVERY IN HYBRID MANETS

A Novel Information Sharing Architecture Constructed by Broadcast Based Information Sharing System (BBISS)

2013, IJARCSSE All Rights Reserved Page 85

Impact of Routing Overhead in A Real-Time MANET Environment

Onroad Vehicular Broadcast

Analysis of GPS and Zone Based Vehicular Routing on Urban City Roads

Investigation on OLSR Routing Protocol Efficiency

AN IMPROVED APPROACH IN FLOODING WITH PACKET REACHABILITY IN FSR (FISHEYE STATE ROUTING) PROTOCOL USING MANET

Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

On-Demand Multicast Routing in Ad Hoc Networks with Unidirectional Links

Data gathering using mobile agents for reducing traffic in dense mobile wireless sensor networks

International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development. Improved OLSR Protocol for VANET

Efficient Directional Network Backbone Construction in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

Performance Evaluation of Two Reactive and Proactive Mobile Ad Hoc Routing Protocols

Using Hybrid Algorithm in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks: Reducing the Number of Transmissions

October Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.

Energy and Spatial Reuse Efficient Network Wide Real-Time Data Broadcasting in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Medium Access Protocols

Efficient On-Demand Routing for Mobile Ad-Hoc Wireless Access Networks

Efficient Broadcasting in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Using Directional Antennas

6. Node Disjoint Split Multipath Protocol for Unified. Multicasting through Announcements (NDSM-PUMA)

Wireless Communication Using Sound

Chapter 3 Part 2 Switching and Bridging. Networking CS 3470, Section 1

Enhanced Partial Dominant Pruning (EPDP) Based Broadcasting in Ad hoc Wireless Networks

Fast, Efficient, and Robust Multicast in Wireless Mesh Networks

AODV-PA: AODV with Path Accumulation

Throughput Improvement by Adjusting RTS Transmission Range for W-LAN Ad Hoc Network

Energy Efficient Broadcasting Using Sparse Topology in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks

Vol. 2, Issue I, Jan ISSN

Energy-Efficient Algorithm for Broadcasting in Ad Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks

olsr.org 'Optimized Link State Routing' and beyond December 28th, 2005 Elektra mesh.net

A Routing Protocol for Utilizing Multiple Channels in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks with a Single Transceiver

Broadcasting, Coverage, Energy Efficiency and Network Capacity in Wireless Networks

Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols OLSR and AODV

Mobility and Density Aware AODV Protocol Extension for Mobile Adhoc Networks-MADA-AODV

A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols

Ad hoc and Sensor Networks Chapter 13a: Protocols for dependable data transport

Dominating Sets and Neighbor Elimination-Based Broadcasting Algorithms in Wireless Networks

Efficient On-Demand Routing for Mobile Ad-Hoc Wireless Access Networks

E-ODMRP:Enhanced ODMRP with Motion. Adaptive Refresh

Broadcasting and topology control in wireless ad hoc networks

Architecture and Evaluation of an Unplanned b Mesh Network

Study and Comparison of Mesh and Tree- Based Multicast Routing Protocols for MANETs

Secure Routing and Transmission Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks

Performance Analysis of Various Routing Protocols for Motorway Surveillance System Cameras Network

Geographic Routing in Simulation: GPSR

Performance Analysis of OLSR and QoS Constraint OLSR in MANET

ICS 351: Today's plan. OSPF BGP Routing in general

Impact of Link Discovery Delay on Optimized Link State Routing Protocol for Mobile ad hoc Networks

Transcription:

Broadcasting Techniques for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Broadcasting: It is the process in which one node sends a packet to all other nodes in the network. 1

Usefulness of broadcasting Broadcasting of net-wide control information Provides route establishment functionality Serves as a building block in ad hoc networking 2

A simplistic form of broadcasting: flooding Flooding: Protocol: Each node retransmits each received unique packet exactly once. Data structure: Each node maintains and uses a table with the following structure Source node Most recent sequence number of packet 3

Flooding F Not retransmitted S: Source C E D A S B In a network with N nodes, there are about N (re)transmissions. 4

Efficient broadcasting Goal: Minimize the number of retransmissions. Some nodes do not retransmit. (Attempt to) ensure that a broadcast packet is delivered to each node in the network. 5

Common attributes MAC layer assumption: 802.11 MAC with no RTS/CTS (rely on clear channel assessment.) Jitter the scheduling of a broadcast packet: Schedule it for retransmission after a random delay (reduces the probability of collision between neighbors) Random Access Delay After a node receives a new packet, it waits for a while to receive the same packet from other neighbors. Based on this info, the node decides to broadcast or not. A packet is not transmitted more than once: prevent infinite loop 6

Classes of efficient flooding algorithms Probability based methods» Probabilistic scheme, counter-based scheme Area based methods» Distance based, location based Neighbor knowledge methods» Flooding with self pruning» Scalable broadcast» Dominant pruning» Multipoint relaying» Ad hoc broadcast protocol 7

Probabilistic scheme (Prob. Based) This works similar to flooding. Nodes rebroadcast with a predetermined probability. In dense networks, multiple nodes share similar transmission coverages. ( some nodes need not retransmit.) In sparse networks, there is much less shared coverage. The probability parameter needs to be high. 8

Counter-based scheme (Prob. Based) Observation: There is an inverse relationship between the number of times a packet is received at a node and the probability of the node reaching additional area. Protocol: (if a new packet is received) Counter = 1 and RAD = random(0, Tmax) RAD not expired: Counter is incremented by 1 for each redundant packet received. RAD expired:» If Counter < Threshold, rebroadcast the packet» Else, drop the packet Advantages: Simplicity, adaptability to local topo. 9

Area based methods Observation If a receiving node is very close to the sender The additional area covered by the receiver is very small. If a receiving node is located near the boundary of the sender s transmission range The additional area covered by the receiver is large (61%). Idea: A node can evaluate additional coverage area based on all received redundant packets. 10

Distance-based scheme Protocol (when a new packet is received) Initiate a RAD. Cache all redundant packets until RAD expires. When RAD expires: examine the locations of all nodes from which the redundant packets have been received.» If the distance between this node and any node (from above) is less than a threshold, drop the packet.» Else, retransmit the packet. 11

Location-based scheme Protocol (assumption: all nodes know their locations) Sender: Adds its own location to the header of the packet. Receiver (when a new packet is received):» Note the location of the sender of the packet.» Calculate the additional coverage area obtainable if the packet is retransmitted by the receiver.» If the additional coverage area < Threshold, then - Drop this packet and all the redundants. Else - assign a RAD. - for each redundant packet, compare the additional coverage area with Threshold and do as above. - If all additional coverage area >= Threshold, retransmit upon expiry of RAD. 12

Neighbor knowledge methods Flooding with self-pruning Scalable broadcast algorithm (SBA) Dominant pruning Multipoint relaying Ad hoc broadcast protocol 13

Flooding with self pruning Protocol (Each node knows its 1-hop neighbors) Sender: Includes its 1-hop neighbors in packet header before (re)transmitting a packet. Receiver (when a new packet is received)» Compare own neighbor list with the sender s.» If the receiving node would not reach any additional nodes, drop the packet. Else, retransmit. 14

Scalable Broadcast Algorithm (SBA) Assumption: Each node knows its 2-hop neighbors, which can be obtained via hello packets. Protocol Sender (say, A) : (Re)transmits a packet (no neighbor info) Receiver (say, B): A new packet is received» B knows all its neighbors common to A that have received the packet.»b starts an RAD - for each redundant packet, find if B can reach more nodes by retransmitting the packet.» RAD expires: Retransmit, if B can reach more nodes. 15

SBA (contd.) Dynamic adjustment of RAD RAD is proportional to (d Nmax /d me ), where» d Nmax is the max neighbor degree among all neighbors.»d me is the node s neighbor degree Idea: Nodes with most neighbors usually broadcast before the others. 16

Dominant Pruning Nodes are assumed to know their 2-hop neighbors Unlike SBA: Rebroadcasting nodes proactively choose some/all of their 1-hop neighbors as rebroadcasting nodes. Packet received Chosen by To retransmit 17

Dominant Pruning (Contd.) Protocol: when a (new) packet is received Check if the header contains the address of this node» No: Do not retransmit» Yes: - Compute the subset of neighbors to retransmit - Include those nodes in the packet header and retransmit the packet. The neighbors who will retransmit (Greedy Set Cover alg.) Identify those 1-hop neighbors such that all (not just remaining) 2-hop neighbors will be covered. 18

Multipoint Relaying Similar to Dominant Pruning Forwarding nodes are chosen by upstream senders. Forwarding nodes are called multipoint relays (MRPs). Different from Dominant Pruning MRPs are included in hello packets. Hello packets trigger packet retransmissions. Computation of MRPs 1. Find all 2-hop neighbors that are reachable only from one 1-hop neighbor. MRP = {this 1-hop neighbor}. 2. Determine the 2-hop neighbors reachable via the MRP set. 3. Identify a new 1-hop neighbor that will cover most of the uncovered 2-hop neighbor, and add it to MRP. 4. Repeat the last two steps until all 2-hop neighbors are covered. 19

Multipoint Relaying (Contd.) Protocol Nodes transmit hello packets from time to time. A hello packet contains the MRPs chosen by the node. When a node receives a hello packet, it checks if it is an MRP for the source of the packet. If yes: the node retransmits all data packets received from that source. Thus, frequency of hello packets affect delay performance. 20

Ad Hoc Broadcast Protocol Uses ideas similar to Multipoint Relaying (MRP). Only nodes designated as a Broadcast Relay Gateway (BRG) within a packet header retransmit. BRGs are chosen in a similar way as MRPS are chosen Differences: BRGs are put in packet header and NOT in hello. Different Step 3: Identify a new 1-hop neighbor that will cover most of the uncovered 2-hop neighbors NOT covered by the source of the packet, and make it a BRG. 21

Performance Comparison Algorithm efficiency with a null (perfect) MAC To know the inherent strength of protocol Effect of network congestion Packet size Source rate (With 802.11, static network, and fixed # of nodes.) Effect of mobility (null MAC, fixed # of nodes) Random waypoint mobility model with zero pause» Nodes choose a random location and move there with a given mean speed. Next, choose another location and another speed to reach there, 22

Algorithm efficiency (Null MAC) Delivery ratio: The % of network nodes who receive any given broadcast packet.» Dense network: All achieve 100%.» Sparse networks: Simple flooding and protocols that utilize neighbor knowledge perform better. Number of retransmitting nodes vs. Node density Benchmarks» Worst: Flooding (every node retransmits)» Best (theoretical): Minimum Connected Dominating Set (MCSD) An MCSD is the smallest set of retransmitting nodes such that the set of nodes are connected and non-mcsd nodes are within 1-hop of at least one MCSD node. 23

Algorithm efficiency (Contd.) Number of retransmitting nodes vs. Node density Benchmarks (Contd.)» MCSD < Neighbor knowledge < Area based < Probability based < Flooding 24

Effect of congestion (802.11) Delivery ratio degrades with higher packet rate. Protocols that minimize the number of retransmissions have better delivery ratio. Delay: The time it takes for the last node to receive a broadcast packet. Delay increases (exponentially?) with broadcast rate.» Worst: Flooding» Best: AHBP Proposal: The concept of RAD higher delivery ratio 25

Effect of mobility (Null MAC) Delivery ratio AHBP: Worst Others: Near 100% 26