A Comprehensive Model for Performance Prediction of Electro-Optical Systems

Similar documents
Use of the Polarized Radiance Distribution Camera System in the RADYO Program

Use of the Polarized Radiance Distribution Camera System in the RADYO Program

Increased Underwater Optical Imaging Performance Via Multiple Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

DEVELOPMENT OF A NOVEL MICROWAVE RADAR SYSTEM USING ANGULAR CORRELATION FOR THE DETECTION OF BURIED OBJECTS IN SANDY SOILS

Topology Control from Bottom to Top

Polarized Downwelling Radiance Distribution Camera System

Technological Advances In Emergency Management

Detection, Classification, & Identification of Objects in Cluttered Images

Analysis of the In-Water and Sky Radiance Distribution Data Acquired During the Radyo Project

Dana Sinno MIT Lincoln Laboratory 244 Wood Street Lexington, MA phone:

Shallow Ocean Bottom BRDF Prediction, Modeling, and Inversion via Simulation with Surface/Volume Data Derived from X-Ray Tomography

Service Level Agreements: An Approach to Software Lifecycle Management. CDR Leonard Gaines Naval Supply Systems Command 29 January 2003

Shallow Ocean Bottom BRDF Prediction, Modeling, and Inversion via Simulation with Surface/Volume Data Derived from X-ray Tomography

Advanced Numerical Methods for Numerical Weather Prediction

Distributed Real-Time Embedded Video Processing

DoD Common Access Card Information Brief. Smart Card Project Managers Group

Information, Decision, & Complex Networks AFOSR/RTC Overview

Enhanced Predictability Through Lagrangian Observations and Analysis

Virtual Prototyping with SPEED

Dr. Stuart Dickinson Dr. Donald H. Steinbrecher Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport, RI May 10, 2011

High-Assurance Security/Safety on HPEC Systems: an Oxymoron?

ARINC653 AADL Annex Update

Multi-Modal Communication

Vision Protection Army Technology Objective (ATO) Overview for GVSET VIP Day. Sensors from Laser Weapons Date: 17 Jul 09 UNCLASSIFIED

Parallelization of a Electromagnetic Analysis Tool

REMOTE SENSING OF VERTICAL IOP STRUCTURE

Advanced Numerical Methods for Numerical Weather Prediction

ASPECTS OF USE OF CFD FOR UAV CONFIGURATION DESIGN

Compliant Baffle for Large Telescope Daylight Imaging. Stacie Williams Air Force Research Laboratory ABSTRACT

4. Lessons Learned in Introducing MBSE: 2009 to 2012

Next generation imager performance model

A Look-up-Table Approach to Inverting Remotely Sensed Ocean Color Data

Directed Energy Using High-Power Microwave Technology

Setting the Standard for Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Pentek Seminar Series. Digital IF Standardization

Office of Global Maritime Situational Awareness

Application of Hydrodynamics and Dynamics Models for Efficient Operation of Modular Mini-AUVs in Shallow and Very-Shallow Waters

Terrain categorization using LIDAR and multi-spectral data

Using Model-Theoretic Invariants for Semantic Integration. Michael Gruninger NIST / Institute for Systems Research University of Maryland

Accuracy of Computed Water Surface Profiles

An Update on CORBA Performance for HPEC Algorithms. Bill Beckwith Objective Interface Systems, Inc.

CASE STUDY: Using Field Programmable Gate Arrays in a Beowulf Cluster

SCICEX Data Stewardship: FY2012 Report

Running CyberCIEGE on Linux without Windows

A Review of the 2007 Air Force Inaugural Sustainability Report

Washington University

WaveNet: A Web-Based Metocean Data Access, Processing and Analysis Tool; Part 4 GLOS/GLCFS Database

Wind Tunnel Validation of Computational Fluid Dynamics-Based Aero-Optics Model

Empirically Based Analysis: The DDoS Case

Architecting for Resiliency Army s Common Operating Environment (COE) SERC

FUDSChem. Brian Jordan With the assistance of Deb Walker. Formerly Used Defense Site Chemistry Database. USACE-Albuquerque District.

U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command (IDAS) Briefer: Jason Morse ARMED Team Leader Ground System Survivability, TARDEC

LARGE AREA, REAL TIME INSPECTION OF ROCKET MOTORS USING A NOVEL HANDHELD ULTRASOUND CAMERA

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Wireless Connectivity of Swarms in Presence of Obstacles

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

A Distributed Parallel Processing System for Command and Control Imagery

INTEGRATING LOCAL AND GLOBAL NAVIGATION IN UNMANNED GROUND VEHICLES

Solid Modeling of Directed-Energy Systems

Using Templates to Support Crisis Action Mission Planning

ATCCIS Replication Mechanism (ARM)

THE NATIONAL SHIPBUILDING RESEARCH PROGRAM

Kathleen Fisher Program Manager, Information Innovation Office

WaveNet: A Web-Based Metocean Data Access, Processing, and Analysis Tool; Part 3 CDIP Database

73rd MORSS CD Cover Page UNCLASSIFIED DISCLOSURE FORM CD Presentation

Towards a Formal Pedigree Ontology for Level-One Sensor Fusion

The Interaction and Merger of Nonlinear Internal Waves (NLIW)

Automation Middleware and Algorithms for Robotic Underwater Sensor Networks

Title: An Integrated Design Environment to Evaluate Power/Performance Tradeoffs for Sensor Network Applications 1

2011 NNI Environment, Health, and Safety Research Strategy

The C2 Workstation and Data Replication over Disadvantaged Tactical Communication Links

Data Reorganization Interface

Rockwell Science Center (RSC) Technologies for WDM Components

2013 US State of Cybercrime Survey

Col Jaap de Die Chairman Steering Committee CEPA-11. NMSG, October

Space and Missile Systems Center

DoD M&S Project: Standardized Documentation for Verification, Validation, and Accreditation

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WEB SITE (EMSWeb)

Concept of Operations Discussion Summary

MODELING AND SIMULATION OF LIQUID MOLDING PROCESSES. Pavel Simacek Center for Composite Materials University of Delaware

ENHANCED FRAGMENTATION MODELING

An Efficient Architecture for Ultra Long FFTs in FPGAs and ASICs

75 TH MORSS CD Cover Page. If you would like your presentation included in the 75 th MORSS Final Report CD it must :

Spacecraft Communications Payload (SCP) for Swampworks

WaveNet: A Web-Based Metocean Data Access, Processing and Analysis Tool, Part 2 WIS Database

Development and Test of a Millimetre-Wave ISAR Images ATR System

Algorithm Comparison for Shallow-Water Remote Sensing

75th Air Base Wing. Effective Data Stewarding Measures in Support of EESOH-MIS

Computer Aided Munitions Storage Planning

Interferometric Measurements Using Redundant Phase Centers of Synthetic Aperture Sonars

Cyber Threat Prioritization

Balancing Transport and Physical Layers in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks: Jointly Optimal Congestion Control and Power Control

Monte Carlo Techniques for Estimating Power in Aircraft T&E Tests. Todd Remund Dr. William Kitto EDWARDS AFB, CA. July 2011

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT OF HALON- REPLACEMENT FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEMS (PHASE II)

High Resolution Stereo Imaging System for Sediment Roughness Characterization

A Passive Ranging Technique for Objects within the Marine Surface Layer

High Frequency Acoustic Reflection and Transmission in Ocean Sediments

Space and Missile Systems Center

3-D Forward Look and Forward Scan Sonar Systems LONG-TERM-GOALS OBJECTIVES APPROACH

C2-Simulation Interoperability in NATO

Edwards Air Force Base Accelerates Flight Test Data Analysis Using MATLAB and Math Works. John Bourgeois EDWARDS AFB, CA. PRESENTED ON: 10 June 2010

Transcription:

A Comprehensive Model for Performance Prediction of Electro-Optical Systems Joseph J. Shirron and Thomas E. Giddings Metron, Inc. Suite 800, 11911 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 phone: (703) 787-8700 fax: (703) 787-3518 email: shirron@metsci.com Contract Number: N00014-06-C-0070 http://www.metsci.com LONG-TERM GOALS The long-term goals of this effort are to provide reliable performance prediction and accurate system simulation capabilities for underwater electro-optic identification (EOID) systems. The Electro-Optical Detection Simulator (EODES) suite of numerical models developed under this program will predict the impact of environmental conditions, system parameters (e.g., apertures and PMT gains), and operational settings (e.g., platform speed and altitude) on system performance. Once fully validated, the models are anticipated to support mine countermeasures (MCM) mission planning and operator training. The two most prominent sensor technologies in this area are Laser Line Scan (LLS) and Streak Tube Imaging Lidar (STIL). Examples of systems using these technologies are the AN/AQS-24 (using LLS) and a variant of the AN/AQS-20 (using STIL) mine-hunting systems. The ALMDS (Airborne Laser Mine Detection System) also uses a STIL sensor to image underwater objects from an airborne platform. High-fidelity models for all these systems have been incorporated into the EODES software. OBJECTIVES Our objectives are to develop and validate EOID models to compute reliable metrics for the prediction of system/operator performance, and for generating synthetic images of bottom scenes under given environmental conditions and operational settings. These models will be validated, certified and incorporated into the Navy Standard Oceanographic and Atmospheric Master Library (OAML). The models will also be integrated into Tactical Decision Aids (TDAs), specifically the Mine Warfare Environmental Decision Aid Library (MEDAL). The code base is being developed in ANSI C/C++ to ensure portability across computer platforms and to facilitate incorporation within fleet TDAs. APPROACH Performance predictions for electro-optical systems are predicated on accurate modeling of light propagation in water. EODES contains a validated radiative transfer solver for ocean environments, which is used as the common basis for all system models. The modular nature of the EODES software framework enables new models to be implemented easily, rapidly, and independently. The investment in the current models and their software code base can be leveraged to accelerate development of other system models through code reuse and sharing of common interfaces for model inputs and outputs. The code base is developed in ANSI C/C++ to provide portability across computer platforms. The EODES model libraries can also be imported into the high-level Python language to facilitate the 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE 2006 2. REPORT TYPE N/A 3. DATES COVERED - 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE A Comprehensive Model for Performance Prediction of Electro-Optical Systems 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Metron, Inc. Suite 800, 11911 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The original document contains color images. 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT UU a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 6 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

development of graphical user interfaces (GUIs) and visual decision aids. Models for the Laser Line Scan (LLS), the Streak Tube Imaging Lidar (STIL) and the Airborne Laser Mine Detection System (ALMDS) are currently implemented. Figure 1: Schematic of the Streak Tube Imaging Lidar (STIL) system. A STIL system uses a pulsed fan-beam to illuminate an entire cross-track line with each laser pulse, as depicted in Figure 1. In addition to a contrast map of the bottom, a pulsed laser provides range data determined from the signal's time of return. Consequently, radiative transfer for a STIL system is inherently time-dependent, and the system is subject to temporal blurring (sometimes referred to as pulse stretching or temporal dispersion). The image formation process of the STIL sensor employs a CCD array, which has its own characteristics, including the potential for saturation. A detailed model of the STIL system was implemented in EODES in the previous year as part of the overall effort. The STIL model is a fundamental component of the ALMDS model. The ALMDS system is conceptually similar to the underwater STIL system, except that the platform is airborne at a typical altitude of 300 feet above the ocean, as sketched in Figure 2. Light is assumed to propagate in air without attenuation or scattering, but reflection and refraction at the air/water interface present significant complications for modeling this system. Glint (or glitter), the specular reflection of the laser beam from the ocean surface, is very important because it can saturate the CCD array and significantly degrade the ability of the sensor to detect an object near the surface. However, glint is very difficult to compute accurately because of the complicated structure and stochastic nature of the surface waves. Refraction across the air/water interface also complicates the imaging process. In air the laser beam is well collimated, but refraction across the wavy surface steers the beam in random directions within the water and destroys the collimation. To account for this, the fan beam is 2

discretized into a large number of well-collimated beams. Each sub-beam is reflected and refracted at the air/water interface according to Snell s Law and the local slope of the wave surface. Within the water the beam is subject to attenuation and scattering, depending on the environmental conditions. The light scattered in the backward direction undergoes further attenuation and scattering as it propagates to the surface, where it is refracted and transmitted into air. The total return is obtained from superposition of the sub-beams. pulsed fanbeam volume mine shadow Radiant Flux (Power) water surface target shadow seabed t s t t Time Figure 2: Schematic of the Airborne Laser Mine Detection System (ALMDS) on left; return signal from water surface and target in water column (if present) on right. On the right of Figure 2 is a sketch of the power in the return signal as a function of time for the cases of a target present and not present. There is a large initial peak in the return due to reflection from the ocean surface (glint). With no target present, the remaining return is from volume backscatter that attenuates exponentially with depth and, therefore, time. With a target present, there is a secondary peak in the return due to scattering from the target, and the difference in time between these peaks is directly related to the depth of the target. The tail end of the return differs from the no-target case due to the shadow region created by the target. Together, the presence of a secondary peak from specular scattering and a suppressed return due to a shadow region form the basis for target detection. 3

WORK COMPLETED A complete model for the ALMDS system has been implemented. It first computes a realization of a portion of a random ocean wave surface, as shown in Figure 3. The wave surface is a superposition of waves of different wavelengths λ and amplitudes. Gravity waves (λ > 1.7 cm) contain most of the wave energy. The energy of waves shorter than capillary waves (1.7 cm > λ > 4 mm) is effectively dissipated by viscous effects. Full details of the surface wave spectrum we have implemented can be found in Apel (1994). Figure 3: Realization of random sea surface generated by filtering a white noise process using semi-empirical model for wind-driven wave spectrum. To compute the (time-dependent) signal received by the ALMDS sensor, we must first propagate the radiance distribution from the fan-beam laser through air down to the ocean surface. This is done without attenuation or scattering, and the result is that the laser illuminates a thin strip at the ocean surface with light that is well collimated. The illuminated area is discretized into small cells, with the light incident on each cell treated independently. In each cell, the normal to the wave surface is computed and the incident light is split into a reflected and refracted component according to Snell's Law. The reflected light (glint) is computed based on the incident radiance and a Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) that includes the effects of subscale wave surface roughness. The reflected light is then propagated back to the sensor without attenuation or scattering. The refracted light is propagated to depth under the small-angle approximation for radiative transfer. The water is conceptually partitioned into thin, vertically stratified slabs. The reflectivity of the slab is taken as β π (the volume scattering coefficient in the backward direction) except when the target 4

intersects the slab, in which case the target reflectivity is used. For slabs below the target the reflectivity in the shadow region is zero. The light scattered from each slab is computed and propagated back to the wavy ocean surface, again under the small-angle scattering assumption. The light is then refracted into the air and propagated back to the receiver. In this way, it is possible to construct the complete time history of the return signal. Actual computations are carried out efficiently using a Fourier optics approach. Figure 4 is a collection of synthetic images generated from a mine-like target at depths of 2 and 4 meters. The wave surfaces are computed for wind speeds of 2, 4, and 6 m/s. For these images the water is clear (no absorption or scattering) to illustrate the effects of refraction alone on image distortion. U = 4 m/s U = 6 m/s D=4m D=2m U = 2 m/s Figure 4: Synthetic images for clear water (without beam attenuation or scattering) demonstrate the effects of reflection and refraction through the water surface at various wind speeds (U) and target depths (D). IMPACT/APPLICATION When completed and validated, the performance prediction models for LLS, STIL and ALMD systems will be available for distribution and incorporation into Fleet Tactical Decision Aids, where they will facilitate effective MCM mission planning. The EODES model suite can also generate synthetic images which are valuable for training human operators, and can be useful in the development and validation of automatic target recognition algorithms. The system models and radiative transfer 5

solvers within EODES will become useful design and analysis tools for prospective electro-optical systems. TRANSITIONS The models and metrics developed and validated by this work have been used to support MIREM exercises in 2003 and 2005 and the RIMPAC exercise in 2006 in testing of the AQS-24 minehunting system. The EODES models are currently in the process of obtaining OAML certification, in preparation for transition to the Naval Oceanographic Office and integration into the MEDAL tactical decision aid. RELATED PROJECTS Airborne Laser Mine Detection System (ALMDS). Rapid Airborne Mine Clearance System (RAMICS) REFERENCES [1] J. J. Shirron and T. E. Giddings, A Model for the Simulation of a Pulsed Laser Line Scan System, MTS/IEEE Oceans 06 Conference Proceedings, Boston, MA, 2006. [2] T. E. Giddings and J. J. Shirron, EODES-3: An Electro-Optic Imaging and Performance Prediction Model, MTS/IEEE Oceans 05 Conference Proceedings, Washington, DC, 2005. [3] T. E. Giddings and J. J. Shirron, EODES-3 Reference Manual, Metron, Inc. [4] J. R. Apel, An Improved Model of the Ocean Surface Wave Number Spectrum and its Effects on Radar Backscatter, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 99, pp. 16269-16291, 1994. 6