POSTED September 3, 2009 QWEST CORPORATION S COMPARABLY EFFICIENT INTERCONNECTION PLAN FOR ENHANCED PROTOCOL PROCESSING SERVICES

Similar documents
Posted October 17, 2006 QWEST CORPORATION COMPARABLY EFFICIENT INTERCONNECTION PLAN FOR ENHANCED DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE

POSTED April 15, 2009 QWEST CORPORATION COMPARABLY EFFICIENT INTERCONNECTION PLAN FOR INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT

POSTED April 15, 2009 QWEST CORPORATION S COMPARABLY EFFICIENT INTERCONNECTION PLAN FOR ON-LINE DATABASE ACCESS SERVICES

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMPARABLY EFFICIENT INTERCONNECTION PLAN

SBC Long Distance Application - Personal Communications Industry Association Comments. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C.

Local Telephone Competition: Status as of December 31, 2010

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

10. Unbundled Dark Fiber 10.1 General

Next Generation 911; Text-to-911; Next Generation 911 Applications. SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission)

BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON

We are filing herewith, for effect November 1, 2003, tariff material consisting of: Revision of

BEFORE THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C

U.S. Regulatory Framework for ILEC Unbundling Obligations in the Context of Fiber Loop Deployments

R i o V i r g i n T e l e p h o n e C o m p a n y P a g e 1 WIRELINE BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE

Company TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE Page 1 of 5 Effective: July 2009

COMPETITIVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROVIDERS: ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE Staff Report. Public Utility Commission of Oregon

PART 2 - Provisions - Midwest, West, Southwest Original Page 1 SECTION 7 - Service Provisioning and Rate Conditions

VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF FCC NO.

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) )

April 11, 2016 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Original Sheet A 1. APPLICATION OF STATEMENT OF RATES... 1

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CENTURYLINK OPERATING COMPANIES TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 11 2ND REVISED INDEX PAGE 8-0 CANCELS 1ST REVISED INDEX PAGE 8-0 ACCESS SERVICE

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATES. Resolution

February 18, Ms. Luly E. Massaro, Commission Clerk Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission 89 Jefferson Boulevard Warwick, RI 02888

Notice of Ex Parte Presentation (CC Docket Nos , and 98-10; CS Docket No )

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF T-MOBILE USA, INC.

MCImetro ACCESS TRANSMISSION SERVICES CORP. NJ B.P.U. TARIFF NO. 1 d/b/a VERIZON ACCESS TRANSMISSION SERVICES ORIGINAL PAGE NO. 42 ACCESS SERVICES

Shoreham Telephone LLC d/b/a OTT Communications

TARIFF DISTRIBUTION. DATE: May 31, 2012

Before The FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

STATE OF MUNNESOTA BEFORE THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

CenturyLink has the ability to raise rates on ISDN-PRI Service on a Term Discount Plan. See Section 3.8.B. for applicable terms and conditions.

AT&T OPERATING COMPANIES TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 1 3rd Revised Title Page 1 ADVANCED SERVICES

October 4, Ex Parte. Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554

TARIFF DISTRIBUTION. DATE: January 23, 2012

PART 19 - Unbundled Network Elements and Number Portability SECTION 6 - Number Portability Original Sheet No. 1

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

PART 3 - Provisions - Southeast 1st Revised Page 1 SECTION 7 - Service Provisioning and Rate Conditions ACCESS SERVICE

DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) SERVICE GUIDE

April 10, 2014 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Lex Mundi Telecommunications Regulation Multi-Jurisdictional Survey

VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF FCC NO.

CC Docket Notice of Detariffing of Common Carrier Wireline Broadband Internet Access Transmission Service

GENERAL CUSTOMER SERVICES TARIFF CONTENTS. S20.1 ISDN Primary Rate Interface (PRI) 2

PART 7 - Central Office Optional Features Original Sheet 1 SECTION 3 - Complementary Network Services (CNS) 7.3 COMPLEMENTARY NETWORK SERVICES

DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) PRICE LIST

PART 12 - Competitive BDS Services - Southwest Original Page 1 SECTION 19 - Self-healing Transport Network

DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) SERVICE GUIDE

Product Guide Verizon North LLC. Section 22 Verizon North LLC Original Sheet 1 INTEGRATED SERVICES DIGITAL NETWORK - PRIMARY RATE INTERFACE (ISDN-PRI)

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

FCC FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION. In the Matter of ) Telephone Number Portability ) CC Docket No ) RM 8535

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C

4. Digital PBX Services 4.1 FLEXPATH

SRT Communications, Inc. Broadband Access Services Wholesale Rate Plan Effective January 1, 2010

MCImetro Access Transmission Services Corp. MARYLAND P.S.C. TARIFF NO. 3 d/b/a Verizon Access Transmission Services ORIGINAL PAGE NO.

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF PCIA THE WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATION

Farmers Mutual Telephone Company. Broadband Internet Access Services. Network Management Practices, Performance Characteristics, and

NETWORK INTERCONNECTION ACCESS SERVICE. Title Sheet NETWORK INTERCONNECTION ACCESS SERVICE SERVICE CATALOG FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS NORTHWEST INC.

GENERAL SERVICES TARIFF P.S.C.-D.C.-No Verizon Washington, DC Inc. 1st Revised Page 1 Cancels Original Page 1

TARIFF DISTRIBUTION. DATE: January 20, 2012

BCN Telecom, Inc. Customer Proprietary Network Information Certification Accompanying Statement

August 19, Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

CONNECTICUT ACCESS SERVICE TARIFF. The Southern New England Original Page 22-1 Telephone Company d/b/a Frontier Communications of Connecticut

AT&T MOBILITY PUERTO RICO INC.

Frontier Telephone Companies TARIFF FCC NO. 3 Original Page 16-1 ACCESS SERVICE

PINELAND TELEPHONE COOPERATIVE, INC.

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON 550 CAPITOL STREET NE, STE. 215 PO BOX 2148 SALEM, OREGON (503) APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF

FN1. The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.

CustomChoice Quick Reference Guide

Pursuant to Florida Statute , we are filing herewith revision to our General Subscriber Service Tariff. Following is the page being filed:

Mark T. Bryant, Ph.D.

Manufactured Home Production by Product Mix ( )

BROADBAND STATUTES AND RECENT LEGISLATION

File No. SR-NASD-00-70

NEVADA BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 1 1st Revised Page 9-1 Cancels Original Page 9-1

CARRIER-TO-CARRIER AGREEMENT CHECKLIST


Wholesale Very high bit-rate Digital Subscriber Line (VDSL) Service

COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

7. Access to Signaling Systems and Call Related Databases 7.0 Limitation on Unbundling Obligation (N)

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ORDER. Adopted: April 21, 2017 Released: April 24, 2017

BEFORE THE WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SYNOPSIS INTRODUCTION

PART 17 - ISDN Services Original Sheet 1 SECTION 1 - ISDN Basic Rate interface (BRI)

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION

GARDONVILLE COOPERATIVE TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION

Harmony Telephone Company. Broadband Internet Access Services. Network Management Practices, Performance Characteristics, and

Product Guide Verizon Delaware LLC. Section 10A Delaware LLC 1st Revised Sheet 1 Cancels Original Sheet 1. ISDN Service

BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS TRANSMISSION SERVICE. Tonica Telephone Company Section 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Alaska no no all drivers primary. Arizona no no no not applicable. primary: texting by all drivers but younger than

MCImetro Access Transmission Services Corp. New York Tariff No. 1 d/b/a Verizon Access Transmission Services Original Page No. 10 ACCESS SERVICES

Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C COMMENTS OF VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP.

February 9, Advice No Oregon Public Utility Commission 201 High St. SE Salem, OR

B. ADDITIONAL LOGICAL CHANNELS

March 15, 2011 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

DIGITAL SUBSCRIBER LINE (DSL) SERVICE GUIDE

Transcription:

POSTED September 3, 2009 QWEST CORPORATION S COMPARABLY EFFICIENT INTERCONNECTION PLAN FOR ENHANCED PROTOCOL PROCESSING SERVICES

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION...1 II. DESCRIPTION OF ENHANCED SERVICES COVERED BY CEI PLAN...2 III. COMPLIANCE WITH CEI PARAMETERS...2 A. Minimization of Transport Costs...3 B. Unbundled End-User Access...4 C. Interoffice Channels Taken at Tariffed Rates...4 D. CEI Pricing Requirements...5 IV. OTHER NONSTRUCTURAL SAFEGUARDS...5 A. Allocation of Joint and Common Costs...5 B. Nondiscrimination Reporting...6 C. Disclosure of Network Information...6 V. DEREGULATED OR DETARIFFED BASIC SERVICES...7 VI. CONCLUSION...7 i

Qwest Corporation ( Qwest ) hereby posts its amended Comparably Efficient Interconnection ( CEI ) Plan for Enhanced Protocol Processing Services. I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the Remand Report and Order released March 10, 1999 in the Computer III Further Remand Proceeding, Qwest hereby amends its CEI Plan and posts it to Qwest s Internet web site. 1 This CEI Plan for Enhanced Protocol Processing Services describes the manner in which Qwest offers the basic services used with its enhanced protocol processing services to competitive enhanced service providers ( ESP ) and end users on equal terms and conditions. 2 This CEI Plan describes the nature of the enhanced services that fit within the category of enhanced protocol processing services and the basic services used in conjunction with these services. It also specifies the manner in which Qwest complies with the four comparably efficient interconnection parameters established by the Commission in Phase II of the Computer III docket. 3 1 In the Matter of Computer III Further Remand Proceedings: Bell Operating Company Provision of Enhanced Services; 1998 Biennial Regulatory Review -- Review of Computer III and ONA Safeguards and Requirements, Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd. 4289 (1999) ( Remand Report and Order ); pet. for recon. granted in part and denied in part, FCC 99-387, rel. Dec. 17, 1999. 2 The Federal Communications Commission ( Commission ) stated that a single CEI plan could cover a family of protocol processing applications. In the Matters of Amendment to Sections 64.702 of the Commission s Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry); and Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Competitive Common Phase II Carrier Service and Facilities Authorizations Thereof; Communications Protocols under Sections 64.702 of the Commission s Rules and Regulations, Report and Order, 2 FCC Rcd. 3072, 3111 n.19 (1987) ( Phase II Order ), modified on recon., 3 FCC Rcd. 1150 (1988) ( Phase II Reconsideration Order ). Accordingly, this CEI Plan covers the family of synchronous protocol conversion services, as well as conversions between synchronous protocols and asynchronous protocols. 3 With respect to protocol processing, the Commission chose to apply the general CEI/ONA principles of the Phase I Order [but to] modify the CEI/ONA requirement for protocol processing, since a literal application of these requirements would be inefficient for the carriers and would not provide meaningful equal access for competitors. Phase II Order, 2 FCC Rcd. at 3078 43-44. Accordingly, the Commission has set forth four CEI requirements for protocol processing, as opposed to the nine CEI parameters for other enhanced services. Compare Phase II Reconsideration Order, 3 FCC Rcd. at 1154-55 28-34, with In the Matters of: Amendment of Sections 64.702 of the Commission s Rules and Regulations (Third Computer Inquiry); and Policy and Rules Concerning Rates for Competitive Common

II. DESCRIPTION OF ENHANCED SERVICES COVERED BY CEI PLAN Qwest s enhanced protocol processing services allow customers to use Qwest s network access services to transport data originated from customer premises equipment ( CPE ), including computers, even though the CPE may employ different communications protocols. Protocol processing subsumes protocol conversion and refers to the use of computers to interpret and react to the protocol symbols as the information contained in a subscriber s message is routed to its destination. The actual protocol conversion is accomplished in an access concentrator, a packet switch, a server, or a dedicated network multiplexer. The instant plan does not cover asynchronous/x.25 and asynchronous/x.75 conversions to the extent Qwest is already permitted to collocate the equipment for those services in its central offices. 4 III. COMPLIANCE WITH CEI PARAMETERS There are four CEI requirements that must be met as part of a CEI Plan for Enhanced Protocol Processing Services. 5 These four requirements are: 1) that transmission costs for competing protocol conversion providers be minimized; 2) that unbundled access be afforded to end users to the protocol conversion capabilities of the underlying carrier and those of others through tariffed services; Carrier Services and Facilities Authorizations Thereof; Communications Protocols under Section 64.702 of the Commission s Rules and Regulations, Report and Order, 104 FCC 2d 958, 1039-43 154-66 (1986) ( Report and Order ), modified on recon., 2 FCC Rcd. 3035 (1987) ( Phase I Reconsideration Order ), further recon., 3 FCC Rcd. 1135 (1988) ( Phase I Further Reconsideration Order ). 4 See In the Matter of Petitions for Waiver of Section 64.702 of the Commission s Rules (Computer II) filed by: Pacific Bell; Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company and South Central Bell Telephone Company; Southwestern Bell Telephone Company; New York Telephone Company and New England Telephone & Telegraph Company; New Jersey Bell Telephone Company; Northwestern Bell Telephone Company; Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company; Ameritech Operating Companies, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 100 FCC 2d 1057 (1985) ( Memorandum Opinion and Order ); In the Matter of Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company Petition for Waiver of Section 64.702 of the Commission s Rules and Regulations to Provide Protocol Conversion as an Adjunct to a Basic Packet Switched Network, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 2 FCC Rcd. 2040 (1987). 5 See Phase II Reconsideration Order, 3 FCC Rcd. at 1155 32-34. 2

3) that interoffice channels be taken at tariffed rates by both the carrier and competing ESPs; and 4) that the CEI pricing requirements imposed in the Phase I Orders be applied. A. Minimization of Transport Costs This requirement obligates a carrier to provide others with interconnection facilities that minimize transport costs associated with integrating enhanced services facilities with basic network facilities. As explained in the Phase II Reconsideration Order, this requirement was designed to reduce transmission cost differences between collocated Bell Operating Company ( BOC ) enhanced service operations and non-collocated ESPs. 6 The Commission stated that a carrier may satisfy this CEI/ONA requirement if it charges itself an access link rate that is the same as that paid by non-collocated enhanced service providers, provided that the access connections in each case are equivalent in technical quality. 7 The Commission further stated: When such differences do not exist, no action is required to further minimize transmission costs. 8 Qwest s enhanced protocol processing services operations obtain basic services from existing tariffs, price lists or catalogs and are, therefore, purchasing access connections at the same rates as are available to unaffiliated ESPs. 9 6 See id. 7 See id. at 1155 34. See also In the Matter of Filing and Review of Open Network Architecture Plans, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 4 FCC Rcd. 1, 78 151 (1988) ( ONA Order ). 8 See In the Matter of Pacific Bell and Nevada Bell, Plan for the Provision of Voice Mail Services, Memorandum Opinion and Order, 3 FCC Rcd. 1095, 1098 35 (1988) (footnote omitted). 9 See Phase I Reconsideration Order, 2 FCC Rcd. at 3048 92. 3

B. Unbundled End-User Access The Commission requires that unbundled access be afforded to end users to the protocol conversion capabilities of the underlying carrier and those of others through tariffed services. End users access the enhanced protocol processing services described herein, and enhanced protocol processing services of competitive ESPs through existing standard network interfaces. Customers may reach the service through tariffed analog or digital private lines or through tariffed DS1 circuits. Dial access to the services will be made through tariffed business lines. No interface, signaling, abbreviated dialing, derived channels or other unique capabilities will be provided to access Qwest s enhanced protocol processing services which are not available to the public in tariffed form or through published price lists or catalogs. If such access arrangements are to be made available to Qwest s enhanced protocol processing services, they will be made available to Qwest s enhanced service competitors at the same time, in the same jurisdictions and on the same terms and conditions. Qwest will also abide by prior commitments as to advance notification to competing ESPs of new interfaces, and the prior notification (including make/buy disclosure) required by the network disclosure rules. 10 C. Interoffice Channels Taken at Tariffed Rates This parameter requires that the basic services and basic service functions that underlie the carrier s enhanced service offering must be unbundled from other basic service offerings and associated with a specific rate element in the tariff. In the case of protocol processing, the Commission specifically requires that the underlying interoffice channels be taken at tariffed rates. 11 Information used by a carrier in providing the unbundled basic service that is not Customer Proprietary Network Information must be made available. The unbundled offerings 10 See 47 C.F.R. 51.331. 4

must also include any options or functions available to the carrier. All basic network capabilities used by the carrier s enhanced service offerings, including signaling, switching, billing and network management, are subject to the unbundling requirement. The basic services that may be used in conjunction with Qwest s enhanced protocol processing services, including interoffice channels, are currently available on an unbundled basis from federal and/or state tariffs, price lists or catalogs. Before Qwest utilizes any new basic services in jurisdictions beyond those indicated in existing network disclosures, Qwest will notify the industry. Tariffs for the basic services may be viewed on Qwest s Internet web site http://tariffs.qwest.com:8000/q_tariffs/index.htm. Qwest states include Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. D. CEI Pricing Requirements This obligates a carrier s enhanced service operations to take the basic services used in its enhanced service offerings at their unbundled tariffed rates. Qwest s enhanced protocol processing services operations pay the same tariffed or price-listed rates for all underlying basic services as are paid by competing ESPs. IV. OTHER NONSTRUCTURAL SAFEGUARDS A. Allocation of Joint and Common Costs In the Verizon/Qwest Cost Forbearance Order 12 the Commission granted Qwest relief from certain cost assignment rules. On December 31, 2008 the Wireline Competition Bureau 11 See Phase II Order, 2 FCC Rcd. at 3079-80 49-56, 3080-81 62; Phase II Reconsideration Order, 3 FCC Rcd. at 1154 28; Memorandum Opinion and Order, 100 FCC 2d at 1091 86, 1094-95 94. 12 In the Matter of Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, Infrastructure and Operating Data Gathering; Petition of AT&T Inc. for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. 160(c) From Enforcement of Certain of the 5

approved Qwest s compliance plan which described in detail how Qwest would fulfill its statutory and regulatory obligations. Qwest will comply with all commitments contained in its compliance plan. B. Nondiscrimination Reporting Qwest tracks promised installation dates met and maintenance time intervals for basic services provided to Qwest s enhanced protocol processing services operations and for those provided to other ESPs via field identifier codes in the service order process. Based on the Commission s Report and Order, nondiscrimination reports are prepared and filed quarterly. 13 These reports are aggregated with other Qwest services offered pursuant to CEI plans, and a single companion report filed for all such services. C. Disclosure of Network Information Pursuant to Section 251(c)(5), the Commission adopted rules requiring incumbent local exchange carriers ( ILEC ) to give competing service providers complete information about network design, technical standards, and planned changes to the network. 14 In its rules, the Commission said that an ILEC may provide the required public notice of network changes by filing a public notice with the Commission or by providing public notice through industry fora, industry publications, or the ILEC s Internet site. 15 The Commission concluded that the Commission s ARMIS Reporting Requirements; Petition of Qwest Corporation for Forbearance from Enforcement of the Commission s ARMIS and 492A Reporting Requirements Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 160(c); Petition of the Embarq Local Reporting Requirements; Petition of Frontier and Citizens ILECs for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. 160(c) From Enforcement of Certain of the Commission s ARMIS Reporting Requirements; Petition of Verizon for Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. 160(c) From Enforcement of Certain of the Commission s Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements; Petition of AT&T Inc. For Forbearance Under 47 U.S.C. 160 From Enforcement of Certain of the Commission s Cost Assignment Rules, 23 FCC Rcd 13647 (2008); appeal pending sub nom. National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates v. FCC, D.C. Cir. 08-1353, filed Nov. 4, 2008. 13 See Report and Order, 104 FCC 2d at 1055-6 192. 14 See 47 C.F.R. 51.325. 15 See 47 C.F.R. 51.329. 6

disclosure standard upon which the rules under Section 251(c)(5) are based was consistent with the scope of the Computer III disclosure requirements. 16 All interfaces offered by Qwest have been disclosed pursuant to the Commission s network disclosure rules. 17 V. DEREGULATED OR DETARIFFED BASIC SERVICES Several Qwest jurisdictions may have detariffed some of the basic services utilized by Qwest enhanced protocol processing services as described herein. In no Qwest jurisdiction is any basic service completely deregulated. In those jurisdictions where any of the basic services utilized to provide Qwest enhanced protocol processing services have been detariffed, the basic services are available on a nondiscriminatory basis, pursuant to a publicly available price list that will be published at reasonable times prior to implementation of the basic service in question. Of course, in jurisdictions where detariffing of other basic services has been accomplished, similar public notices of such new basic services will likewise be accomplished. Tariffs and price lists for these basic services may be viewed on Qwest s Internet web site http://tariffs.qwest.com:8000/q_tariffs/index.htm. VI. CONCLUSION Qwest has demonstrated herein that its currently offered enhanced protocol processing services comply with all Commission-mandated CEI requirements and serve the public interest. Barring further action by the Commission, Qwest will continue to offer its enhanced protocol processing services pursuant to the terms and conditions described herein. 16 See Remand Report and Order, 14 FCC Rcd. 4289. 17 See 47 C.F.R. 51.325, et seq. 7