Ensuring Proper Storage for Earth Science Data: The USGS Process to Certify Trusted Digital Repositories

Similar documents
GEOSS Data Management Principles: Importance and Implementation

Certification. F. Genova (thanks to I. Dillo and Hervé L Hours)

Trust and Certification: the case for Trustworthy Digital Repositories. RDA Europe webinar, 14 February 2017 Ingrid Dillo, DANS, The Netherlands

DEVELOPING, ENABLING, AND SUPPORTING DATA AND REPOSITORY CERTIFICATION

Assessing the FAIRness of Datasets in Trustworthy Digital Repositories: a 5 star scale

DRI: Preservation Planning Case Study Getting Started in Digital Preservation Digital Preservation Coalition November 2013 Dublin, Ireland

Agenda. Bibliography

Data Curation Handbook Steps

How can CLARIN archive and curate my resources?

DSA WDS Partnership Working Group Catalogue of Common Requirements

Trusted Digital Repositories. A systems approach to determining trustworthiness using DRAMBORA

Basic Requirements for Research Infrastructures in Europe

DSA WDS Partnership Working Group Catalogue of Common Requirements

Conducting a Self-Assessment of a Long-Term Archive for Interdisciplinary Scientific Data as a Trustworthy Digital Repository

Improving a Trustworthy Data Repository with ISO 16363

DRI: Dr Aileen O Carroll Policy Manager Digital Repository of Ireland Royal Irish Academy

Digital Preservation Standards Using ISO for assessment

National Snow and Ice Data Center. Plan for Reassessing the Levels of Service for Data at the NSIDC DAAC

Core Trustworthy Data Repositories Extended Guidance. Core Trustworthy Data Repositories Requirements for Extended Guidance

University of British Columbia Library. Persistent Digital Collections Implementation Plan. Final project report Summary version

Digital Preservation Policy. Principles of digital preservation at the Data Archive for the Social Sciences

Checklist and guidance for a Data Management Plan, v1.0

Indiana University Research Technology and the Research Data Alliance

An overview of the OAIS and Representation Information

National Snow and Ice Data Center. Plan for Reassessing the Levels of Service for Data at the NSIDC DAAC

UNT Libraries TRAC Audit Checklist

Stewarding NOAA s Data: How NCEI Allocates Stewardship Resources

Science Europe Consultation on Research Data Management

Implementation of the Data Seal of Approval

Data Management Checklist

Effective: 12/31/17 Last Revised: 8/28/17. Responsible University Administrator: Vice Chancellor for Information Services & CIO

Emory Libraries Digital Collections Steering Committee Policy Suite

31 March 2012 Literature Review #4 Jewel H. Ward

Applying Archival Science to Digital Curation: Advocacy for the Archivist s Role in Implementing and Managing Trusted Digital Repositories

The International Journal of Digital Curation Issue 1, Volume

Digital Preservation: How to Plan

Implementation of the Data Seal of Approval

Introduction to Digital Preservation. Danielle Mericle University of Oregon

Implementation of the CoreTrustSeal

Implementation of the Data Seal of Approval

Computing Accreditation Commission Version 2.0 CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING COMPUTING PROGRAMS

ICGI Recommendations for Federal Public Websites

Edinburgh DataShare: Tackling research data in a DSpace institutional repository

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES. HANDBOOK for

CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING COMPUTING PROGRAMS

Data publication and discovery with Globus

Business Model for Global Platform for Big Data for Official Statistics in support of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

Information Security Continuous Monitoring (ISCM) Program Evaluation

NRF Open Access Statement Impact Survey

ISMTE Best Practices Around Data for Journals, and How to Follow Them" Brooks Hanson Director, Publications, AGU

Data Management Plan Generic Template Zach S. Henderson Library

Developing Data Management Plans (DMP) Scholarly Communication Initiative Mississippi State University Libraries March 25, 2015

Conferenza GARR Moving Forward to deliver an «EOSC in Practice» by 2018

DRS Update. HL Digital Preservation Services & Library Technology Services Created 2/2017, Updated 4/2017

Managing Records in Electronic Formats. An Introduction

The U.S. National Spatial Data Infrastructure

Sustainable Governance for Long-Term Stewardship of Earth Science Data

Implementing the Army Net Centric Data Strategy in a Service Oriented Environment

An Introduction to PREMIS. Jenn Riley Metadata Librarian IU Digital Library Program

Preservation. Policy number: PP th March Table of Contents

EUDAT. Towards a pan-european Collaborative Data Infrastructure

Interdisciplinary Processes at the Digital Repository of Ireland

European digital repository certification: the way forward

CRITERIA FOR CERTIFICATION BODY ACCREDITATION IN THE FIELD OF RISK BASED INSPECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Developing a Research Data Policy

Lessons Learned. Implementing Rosetta in the Harold B. Lee Library

Certification Efforts at Nestor Working Group and cooperation with Certification Efforts at RLG/OCLC to become an international ISO standard

RDM through a UK lens - New Roles for Librarians?

NSF Data Management Plan Template Duke University Libraries Data and GIS Services

Welcome to the Pure International Conference. Jill Lindmeier HR, Brand and Event Manager Oct 31, 2018

DataFlow and VIDaaS Workshop

EUDAT- Towards a Global Collaborative Data Infrastructure

CODATA: Data Citation Workshop Perspectives from Editors and Publishers. Brooks Hanson Director, Publications, AGU

Paving the Rocky Road Toward Open and FAIR in the Field Sciences

DCH-RP Trust-Building Report

Overview of the USGS Plan for Quality Assurance of Digital Aerial Imagery

Summary of FERC Order No. 791

Brown University Libraries Technology Plan

ASPECT Adopting Standards and Specifications for. Final Project Presentation By David Massart, EUN April 2011

UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM LIBRARIES, RESEARCH AND LEARNING RESOURCES

QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICY. Quality Assurance Policy. September 2016 Version 2.0 Policy authorised by Responsible Officer

ISO Information and documentation Digital records conversion and migration process

Digital Preservation at NARA

Implementation of the Data Seal of Approval

How FAIR am I? FAIR Principles and Interoperability of Data and Tools

Data management and discovery

eidas Workshop Return on Experience from Conformity Assessment Bodies - EY June 13, 2016 Contacts: Arvid Vermote

Physical Security Reliability Standard Implementation

Interagency Advisory Board HSPD-12 Insights: Past, Present and Future. Carol Bales Office of Management and Budget December 2, 2008

About Knowledge Convergence. e-infrastructures Austria an interdisciplinary case study concerning research resources and their management

Research Data Management & Preservation: A Library Perspective

Executive Order 13556

University of Maryland Libraries: Digital Preservation Policy

iii) Activity Definitions

The OAIS Reference Model: current implementations

SCIOPS SERAD Referencing and data archiving Service

ebooks Preservation at Scholars Portal Kate Davis & Grant Hurley Scholars Portal, Ontario Council of University Libraries

Fair data and open data: differences and consequences

Woodson Research Center Digital Preservation Policy

Dataverse and DataTags

Transcription:

Ensuring Proper Storage for Earth Science Data: The USGS Process to Certify Trusted Digital Repositories U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey John Faundeen, Clara Brown, Keith Kirk PECORA 20 November 2017

Outline Drivers Certification Bodies Review Criteria A Twist Outcomes

What is a Trusted Digital Repository? A trusted digital repository is one whose mission is to provide reliable, long-term access to managed digital resources to its designated community, now and in the future. (source: https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/research/activities/trustedrep/repositories.pdf) So What? - Ensuring the long-term viability of the data we're collecting will give us a greater return on the investment we've put into our research.

Drivers Consistent with New USGS Preservation Policy Complies with 2013 OSTP Objectives Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research Addresses requirements from 2013 EO 13642 Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information Supports 2013 OMB Memorandum Open Data Policy Managing Data as an Asset

Certification Bodies International Standards Organization Cadillac Data Seal of Approval (DSA) Internationally Recognized USGS EROS in 2014 World Data System (WDS) Internationally Recognized DSA-WDS Combined in 2016

Review Criteria 1. The repository has an explicit MISSION to provide access to and preserve data in its domain. 2. The repository maintains all applicable LICENSES covering data access and use and monitors compliance. 3. The repository has a CONTINUITY PLAN to ensure ongoing access to and preservation of its holdings. 4. The repository ensures, to the extent possible, that data are created, curated, accessed, and used in compliance with DISCIPLINARY AND ETHICAL NORMS. 5. The repository has adequate FUNDING and sufficient numbers of qualified staff managed through a clear system of governance to effectively carry out the mission. 6. The repository adopts mechanism(s) to secure ongoing EXPERT GUIDANCE and feedback (either in-house, or external, including scientific guidance, if relevant). 7. The repository guarantees the INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY of the data. 8. The repository accepts data and metadata based on DEFINED CRITERIA to ensure relevance and understandability for data users.

Review Criteria 9. The repository applies DOCUMENTED PROCESSES and procedures in managing archival storage of the data. 10. The repository assumes responsibility for LONG-TERM PRESERVATION and manages this function in a planned and documented way. 11. The repository has appropriate expertise to address technical DATA AND METADATA QUALITY and ensures that sufficient information is available for end users to make quality-related evaluations. 12. Archiving takes place according to DEFINED WORKFLOWS from ingest to dissemination. 13. The repository enables users to DISCOVER THE DATA and refer to them in a persistent way through proper citation. 14. The repository enables REUSE of the data over time, ensuring that appropriate metadata are available to support the understanding and use of the data. 15. The repository functions on well-supported operating systems and other CORE INFRASTRUCTAL software and is using hardware and software technologies appropriate to the services it provides to its Designated Community. 16. The TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE of the repository provides for protection of the facility and its data, products, services, and users.

A Twist Typical Process Apply Directly w/criteria Responses Blind Review Pass/Fail USGS Process Apply w/criteria Responses to USGS USGS Review Panel More Iterative Plan to Migrate to International Approach

Outcomes ScienceBase Pilot Spring 2017 Alaska Science Center Fall 2017 EROS 2014 Data Seal of Approval Recertification Future Steps More In-reach, Reluctant Centers, External Use

Questions John Faundeen faundeen@usgs.gov