Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track. Cisco May 2012

Similar documents
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. Enterprise Architects February 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd July Rebind Capability in DHCPv6 Reconfigure Messages

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 5451 March 2012 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. May Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) Bootstrapping for the Integrated Scenario

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7319 BCP: 191 July 2014 Category: Best Current Practice ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. February 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6441 BCP: 171 November 2011 Category: Best Current Practice ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: October 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6440 Category: Standards Track. Huawei December 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) June Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track. July 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Cisco Systems, Inc. April 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8035 Updates: 5761 November 2016 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. J. Halpern Ericsson E. Levy-Abegnoli, Ed. Cisco February 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: March 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track May 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7537 Updates: 4379, L. Andersson S. Aldrin Huawei Technologies May 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: January 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. G. Zorn, Ed. Network Zen D. Miles Google B. Lourdelet Juniper Networks April 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. May IEEE Information Element for the IETF

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7189 Category: Standards Track March 2014 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational March 2016 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8191 Category: Standards Track. X. Lee CNNIC. August 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track April 2013 ISSN: Formally Deprecating Some ICMPv4 Message Types

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: August 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 4326 June 2014 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6034 Category: Standards Track October 2010 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7973 Category: Informational ISSN: November 2016

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track March 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. March 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8142 Category: Standards Track April 2017 ISSN:

DHCPv6 Option for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6939 Category: Standards Track. May 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 6811 September 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Moving the Undeployed TCP Extensions RFC 1072, RFC 1106, RFC 1110, RFC 1145, RFC 1146, RFC 1379, RFC 1644, and RFC 1693 to Historic Status.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: March 2016

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Best Current Practice. Cisco Systems July IPv6 Prefix Length Recommendation for Forwarding

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: January 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track ISSN: September 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6379 Obsoletes: 4869 Category: Informational October 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Google K. Patel Cisco Systems August 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 2474 August 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Request for Comments: 7314 Category: Experimental July 2014 ISSN: Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS) EXPIRE Option.

Request for Comments: 5498 Category: Standards Track March IANA Allocations for Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) Protocols

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track ISSN: July 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7330 Category: Standards Track. Cisco Systems August 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7237 Category: Informational June 2014 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Huawei Technologies November 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. R. Asati Cisco January 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6612 Category: Informational May 2012 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: March 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: March 2012

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6309

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Informational. August IANA Registration for the Cryptographic Algorithm Object Identifier Range

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6610 Category: Standards Track. K. Chowdhury Radio Mobile Access, Inc. J. Choi.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track. January 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7725 Category: Standards Track February 2016 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track April 2011 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) October This document establishes an IETF URN Sub-namespace for use with OAuth-related specifications.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track March 2015 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) BCP: 183 May 2013 Category: Best Current Practice ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7213 Category: Standards Track. M. Bocci Alcatel-Lucent June 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 5736 Category: Informational. ICANN January 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: March 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) ISSN: April 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Best Current Practice ISSN: March 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Updates: 6376 January 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7504 June 2015 Updates: 1846, 5321 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6522 STD: 73 January 2012 Obsoletes: 3462 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8278 Category: Standards Track. S. Gundavelli Cisco January 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8516 Category: Standards Track January 2019 ISSN:

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems D. Tappan Consultant October 2009

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Experimental February 2014 ISSN:

Applicability Statement: DNS Security (DNSSEC) DNSKEY Algorithm Implementation Status

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8440 Category: Standards Track ISSN: August 2018

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7660 Category: Standards Track. October 2015

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: November 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8297 Category: Experimental December 2017 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6028 Category: Experimental ISSN: October 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7881 Category: Standards Track. Big Switch Networks July 2016

Request for Comments: Starent Networks A. Lior Bridgewater Systems K. Leung Cisco Systems October 2007

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track ISSN: S. Previdi. Cisco Systems

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: Y. Umaoka IBM December 2010

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 7809 Updates: 4791 March 2016 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6725 Category: Standards Track August 2012 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Informational. R. White. D. McPherson Verisign, Inc.

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6470 Category: Standards Track February 2012 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) May 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. M. Nottingham, Ed. Akamai April 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) ISSN: April 2014

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track. Juniper July 2017

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: April 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6061 Category: Informational January 2011 ISSN:

Request for Comments: 4433 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems Inc. March 2006

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Category: Standards Track. February 2011

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Juniper Networks K. Watsen Watsen Networks R. Wilton Cisco Systems March 2019

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8069 Category: Informational February 2017 ISSN:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Cisco C. Perkins Futurewei Inc. October Separation of Control and User Plane for Proxy Mobile IPv6

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: ISSN: November 2013

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 8441 Updates: 6455 September 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN:

Transcription:

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Request for Comments: 6626 Updates: 5177 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 G. Tsirtsis V. Park V. Narayanan K. Leung Cisco May 2012 Dynamic Prefix Allocation for Network Mobility for Mobile IPv4 (NEMOv4) Abstract The base Network Mobility for Mobile IPv4 (NEMOv4) specification defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 for mobile networks. This specification defines a dynamic prefix allocation mechanism for NEMOv4. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6626. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust s Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track [Page 1]

Table of Contents 1. Introduction...2 2. Requirements Notation...2 3. Dynamic Mobile Prefix Allocation...2 3.1. Mobile Client Considerations...2 3.2. Home Agent Considerations...3 4. Security Considerations...4 5. IANA Considerations...4 6. Acknowledgements...4 7. Normative References...4 1. Introduction The base NEMOv4 specification [RFC5177] defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 [RFC5944] for mobile networks. This specification adds support for dynamic allocation of mobile prefixes by the home agent. 2. Requirements Notation The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 3. Dynamic Mobile Prefix Allocation The following extension is defined according to this specification. 3.1. Mobile Client Considerations According to this specification, the Prefix field of the Mobile Network Request extension MUST be set to zero to indicate that the Mobile Router requests mobile network prefix(es) be assigned to it by the home agent. In this case, the Mobile Router MAY set the prefix length field of such extensions to zero or to a length of its choice as a hint to the home agent. According to this specification, Mobile Network Request extensions with the Prefix field set to zero MAY be included in a registration request message either during initial registration or during a subsequent registration. When a Mobile Router receives a registration reply, it MUST process it as defined in Mobile IPv4 [RFC5944] and [RFC5177]. If one or more network acknowledgement extensions are included with the Code field set to "Success", the Mobile Router SHOULD treat the prefixes in the corresponding Prefix fields as allocated prefixes and create the appropriate bindings as defined in [RFC5177]. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track [Page 2]

In response to a registration request with a Mobile Network Request extension with the Prefix field set to zero, if a Mobile Router receives a registration reply with a network acknowledgement extension including Code field set to 1 "invalid prefix", it may use it as a hint that the home agent does not support dynamic prefix allocation. 3.2. Home Agent Considerations A home agent receiving a Mobile Network Request extension with the Prefix field set to zero MAY return a Mobile Network Acknowledgement extension [RFC5177] with the Prefix field set to the prefix allocated to the Mobile Router. The length of that prefix is at the discretion of the home agent. The home agent MAY take into account the prefix length hint if one is included in the Mobile Network Request extension. Once the home agent allocates a prefix, it MUST maintain the prefix registration table as defined in [RFC5177]. Alternatively, the home agent MAY return a Mobile Network Acknowledgement extension with the Code field set to one of the negative codes defined in [RFC5177]. Dynamic mobile prefix allocation, as defined in this specification, MAY be combined with dynamic home address allocation, as defined in [RFC5177]. In other words, the home address field of the registration request message MAY be set to zero while the message also includes one or more Mobile Network Request extensions with the Prefix field also set to zero. Once the home agent allocates a prefix, it MUST maintain the prefix registration table as defined in [RFC5177]. The lifetime of the allocated prefix will be equal to the lifetime of the binding cache entry. The Mobile Router may request for multiple mobile network prefixes to be assigned by the home agent. For a Mobile Network Prefix for which the assignment was unsuccessful, the Code field in the corresponding Mobile Network Acknowledgement extension should be set to 4 (MOBNET_UNASSIGNED). For dynamic prefix allocation, the Mobile Router s home address MAY be used to identify the client if it is not set to zero. Otherwise, as defined in the Network Access Identifier (NAI) extension [RFC2794] of Mobile IPv4 [RFC2794], the NAI extension needs to be included in the registration request, in which case the same extension SHOULD be used to identify the Mobile Router for prefix allocation purposes. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track [Page 3]

4. Security Considerations This specification operates in the security constraints and requirements of Mobile IPv4 [RFC5944], NAI [RFC2794], and [RFC5177]. Home agent implementations SHOULD take steps to prevent address exhaustion attacks. One way to limit the effectiveness of such an attack is to limit the number and size of prefixes any one Mobile Router can be allocated. 5. IANA Considerations A new value has been assigned in the Mobile Network Acknowledgement Extension registry: 4 - Home Agent cannot assign a mobile network prefix (MOBNET_UNASSIGNED). 6. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Pete McCann, Alexandru Petrescu, Ralph Droms, and Jari Arkko for their reviews and comments. 7. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2794] Calhoun, P. and C. Perkins, "Mobile IP Network Access Identifier Extension for IPv4", RFC 2794, March 2000. [RFC5177] Leung, K., Dommety, G., Narayanan, V., and A. Petrescu, "Network Mobility (NEMO) Extensions for Mobile IPv4", RFC 5177, April 2008. [RFC5944] Perkins, C., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised", RFC 5944, November 2010. Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track [Page 4]

Authors Addresses George Tsirtsis EMail: tsirtsis@googlemail.com Vincent Park Phone: +908-443-8141 EMail: vpark@qualcomm.com Vidya Narayana Phone: +858-845-2483 EMail: vidyan@qualcomm.com Kent Leung Cisco Phone: +408-526-5030 EMail: kleung@cisco.com Tsirtsis, et al. Standards Track [Page 5]