(Towards) A metadata model for atmospheric data resources

Similar documents
Towards a Portal to Atmospheric and Marine Information Resources (PAMIR)

The descriptions of the elements and measures are based on Annex D of ISO/DIS Geographic information Data quality.

Global Monitoring for Environment and Security

Toward Horizon 2020: INSPIRE, PSI and other EU policies on data sharing and standardization

Initial Operating Capability & The INSPIRE Community Geoportal

The Jülich WCS interface for emissions, model products, and model evaluation

Open Geospatial Consortium

GUIDANCE AND INTERPRETATION DOCUMENTS TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMPETENCE OF CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BODIES

INSPIRE status report

C3S Data Portal: Setting the scene

GMES The EU Earth Observation Programme

GeoDCAT-AP Representing geographic metadata by using the "DCAT application profile for data portals in Europe"

Metadata allows. Metadata Existing Guidelines. Data to be found Starts interoperability. Decision making based on Quality Relevance Time Geography

The European Commission s science and knowledge service. Joint Research Centre

GEMS: Global Earth-system Monitoring using Satellite & in-situ Data

A guide to reference standards in support of Quality Assurance requirements of GEO QA4EO-QAEO-GEN-DQK-003

ENISA s Position on the NIS Directive

Data and visualization

Metadata for Data Discovery: The NERC Data Catalogue Service. Steve Donegan

Guidelines 4/2018 on the accreditation of certification bodies under Article 43 of the General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679)

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU)

Kick-off Meeting DPIA Test phase

GMES Status November 2004

Copernicus Space Component. Technical Collaborative Arrangement. between ESA. and. Enterprise Estonia

GOVERNMENT GAZETTE REPUBLIC OF NAMIBIA

Guidelines for Interface Publication Issue 3

Directive on Security of Network and Information Systems

MetOcean Themes in INSPIRE

1. CONCEPTUAL MODEL 1.1 DOMAIN MODEL 1.2 UML DIAGRAM

Integration of INSPIRE & SDMX data infrastructures for the 2021 population and housing census

Compass INSPIRE Services. Compass INSPIRE Services. White Paper Compass Informatics Limited Block 8, Blackrock Business

How to Create a European INSPIRE Compliant Data Specification. Anja Hopfstock, BKG (Germany) Morten Borrebæk, SK (Norway)

The NIS Directive and Cybersecurity in

NetCDF Metadata Guidelines for FY 2011 IOC NOAA Climate Data Records

Commission for Atmospheric Sciences: Quality Management Framework in the Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) Programme

Deliverable 6.4. Initial Data Management Plan. RINGO (GA no ) PUBLIC; R. Readiness of ICOS for Necessities of integrated Global Observations

INSPIRE overview and possible applications for IED and E-PRTR e- Reporting Alexander Kotsev

ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY

Using INSPIRE Services for Reporting and Exchange of Air Quality Information under CAFE Directive Test bed Results

European Research Policy related to Geo- information for Disaster Management

CEN and CENELEC Position Paper on the draft regulation ''Cybersecurity Act''

Metadata of geographic information

8 Dataset-level metadata

Requirements for Observational Metadata: CAS

Monitoring the Environment for Climate Change: The case of GMES

SWAMID Person-Proofed Multi-Factor Profile

Air Quality Community Experiences and Perspectives on International Interoperability Standards

Sector Vision for the Future of Reference Standards

European Aviation Safety Agency

S5P Mission Performance Centre Carbon Monoxide [L2 CO ] Readme

A Climate Monitoring architecture for space-based observations

Project overview. Gelsomina Pappalardo National Research Council of Italy. AEROCOM - ACTRIS Meeting Hamburg, Germany 26 September 2013

INSPIRE compliant e-reporting under the air quality directives from a member state perspective (Belgium)

Croatian NSDI Metadata Profile

INSPIRE & Environment Data in the EU

Reporting and Exchange of Air Quality Information Under CAFE Directive Using INSPIRE Services Testbed Results

Comparison of Metadata Standards A Proposal for Hungarian Core Metadata Standard

Reporting of modelled data under the AQD IPR for e-reporting

The GIGAS Methodology

Swedish experiences of reporting according to UNFCCC and KP Malin Kanth Swedish EPA

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Standards-based Access to Satellite Atmospheric Composition Data

Monitoring and Reporting Drafting Team Monitoring Indicators Justification Document

European Commission s proposal for a Regulation on Electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the EU internal market

The Generic Earth Observation Metadata Standard (GEOMS) QA/QC Checks

Guidelines for the encoding of spatial data

The Reporting Obligations Database. What it is and how it can be used

International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2015, Vol.10,

Conformity assessment

Submission of information in the public consultation on potential candidates for substitution under the Biocidal Products Regulation

Using the Network Common Data Form for storage of atmospheric data

Cybersecurity. Quality. security LED-Modul. basis. Comments by the electrical industry on the EU Cybersecurity Act. manufacturer s declaration

Memo on Stakeholder Consultation on Article 10(2) of Directive 2012/19/EU

Long-term preservation for INSPIRE: a metadata framework and geo-portal implementation

National Research Council of Italy. Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis

A guide to content of a documentary procedure to meet the Quality Assurance requirements of GEO QA4EO-QAEO-GEN-DQK-002

Analysis Ready Data For Land

For each use case, the business need, usage scenario and derived requirements are stated. 1.1 USE CASE 1: EXPLORE AND SEARCH FOR SEMANTIC ASSESTS

Common Understanding 10/2014 Implementation of Article 6(5) of the Commission Regulation (EU) 73/2010

BOARD OF THE BANK OF LITHUANIA. RESOLUTION No 46 ON THE REGULATIONS ON KEEPING THE PUBLIC REGISTER OF PAYMENT INSTITUTIONS. of 24 December 2009

Harmonised standards and spectrum regulations

Progress Report Workflow Create the Progress Report Record/Edit the Progress Report General Version Information...

Italy - Information Day: 2012 FP7 Space WP and 5th Call. Peter Breger Space Research and Development Unit

Introduction to INSPIRE. Network Services

Detailed analysis + Integration plan

Using WIS to support WIGOS Steve Foreman WIS Branch

Guidelines for the encoding of spatial data

INSPIRE Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe. D2.8.III.15 Data Specification on Oceanographic geographical features Technical Guidelines

Action : Streamlining the monitoring and reporting for 2019

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL ENVIRONMENT Directorate C - Quality of Life, Water & Air ENV.C.2 - Marine Environment & Water Industry

USING STANDARDS TO ASSESS THE COMPETENCE OF CONFORMITY

Data Harmonization Working Group (DHWG) Engineering Report GEOSS Architecture Implementation Pilot, Phase 3 Version FINAL

COREP/FINREP XBRL Taxonomy v2.0.0

Changing times in Swiss Data Privacy: new opportunities? Microsoft Security Day 27 April 2017 Clara-Ann Gordon

List of EA Publications. Documents

European Commission Directorate General Enterprise and Industry INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ON

PortalU, a Tool to Support the Implementation of the Shared Environmental Information System (SEIS) in Germany

Indexing Field Descriptions Recommended Practice

USING DC FOR SERVICE DESCRIPTION

CEF e-invoicing. Presentation to the European Multi- Stakeholder Forum on e-invoicing. DIGIT Directorate-General for Informatics.

Transcription:

(Towards) A metadata model for atmospheric data resources Anne De Rudder and Jean-Christopher Lambert Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA), Brussels

The context EU FP7 Ground-based atmospheric observing system GEOMon Ground-based data for MACC validation NORS GEMS Core & downstream service development GHG, reactive gases, aerosol, AQ, solar radiation MACC Core service MACC II Validation PROMOTE ESA GMES Service Element Ozone, UV, AQ, climate study, aviation control PROMOTE 2 Input and validation PASODOBLE (Air Quality) EVOSS (Volcanos) Downstream service Final products Obligation of INSPIRE compliance INTEROPERABILITY Projects that have contributed to the GMES/Copernicus Atmospheric Service Final products End users Research, monitoring, environmental policy, aviation control, health, sport, leisure, 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Prototypes Pre-operational Operational 2014

The context (cont.) EU contribution to the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)

Quality Quality Assurance Framework for Earth Observation is a contribution to the providing guidance on the quality assurance of Earth Observation data Provision of quality indicators (e.g. uncertainties) allowing the user to assess whether the product is «fit-for-purpose» Traceability of instrument calibration and data generation Traceability of validation (i.e. of quality indicator calculation) Accordance with standard procedures and, as far as possible, SI

Dimensionality Atmospheric (and more generally Earth Observation) data are usually 4- dimensional Atmospheric data may depend on a variety of independent variables (not only longitude and/or latitude) which, as such, have all the same status and should be documented symetrically.

Integration of existing concepts and models Generic Earth Observation Metadata Standard (GEOMS) metadata scheme HDF-based promoted by ESA used by space agencies, NDACC, Cal/Val databases EVDC (ESA), AVDC (NASA) Climate Forecast (CF) Metadata Convention NetCDF-based widely used within the climate community Forthcoming metadata guidelines from the GEO Air Quality (AQ) Community of Practice (CoP)

Preliminary questions, options, decisions Granularity What is the type of object we want to describe with one given metadata set? In other terms, if a dataset is the entity we want to describe, what do we define as a dataset? Purpose What is the metadata intended for? Volume How detailed (= voluminous) do we want the metadata scheme to be? Compliance with standards Which standards? What are the implications?

Metadata quality What do we need to care for in order to get good (pertinent, useful, complete) metadata? A good metadata scheme does not guarantee good metadata! It does not even guarantee compliance with some adopted standard Provide clear definitions of metadata elements (+ possibly examples) Where possible, provide lists of preselected metadata values Make room for atypical cases by offering options such as o other o not applicable o unknown (yet) o [void] either appears as not provided in the output or does not appear at all Applies even to mandatory metadata fields, except if the field value determines which branch of the scheme must be followed (e.g. if the resource is a dataset, the applicable metadata fields will be different from those for a service) Avoid redundancies

An atmospheric metadata model Derived from the PASODOBLE detailed metadata model A B Product description A1 Identification and nature A2 Domain of definition A3 Domain of values A4 Quality A5 History A6 Presentation, coding, format Product generation B1 Developer B2 Derivation chain and intermediate validation C Product availability, distribution and use C1 Provider C2 Applications C3 Maintenance and update C4 Delivery C5 Terms and conditions C6 Support D References D1 Publications informing on the resource D2 Standards of reference E Metadata

INSPIRE discovery metadata Described in the INSPIRE Metadata Regulation (*) Includes the set of top-level metadata supposed to apply to any spatial resource Completed by data specifications one for each INSPIRE data theme there is one for Atmospheric Conditions and Meteorological Geographical Features (*) Commission Regulation (EC) No 1205/2008 of 3 December 2008 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards metadata, Official Journal of the European Union, December 4, 2008.

Mapping with INSPIRE A B Product description A1 Identification and nature A2 Domain of definition A3 Domain of values A4 Quality A5 History Spatial resolution A6 Presentation, coding, format Product generation B1 Developer Lineage B2 Derivation chain and intermediate validation C Product availability, distribution and use C1 Provider C2 Applications C3 Maintenance and update C4 Delivery C5 Terms and conditions C6 Support D References D1 Publications D2 Standards E Metadata INSPIRE discovery metadata 1. Identification 2. Classification 3. Keyword 4. Geographic location 5. Temporal reference 6. Quality and validity 7. Conformity 8. Constraint related to access and use 9. Organisation responsible for the establishment, management, maintenance and distribution of spatial data and services 10.Metadata on metadata

Compliance issues to be solved A B Product A1 Identification and nature A2 Domain of definition A3 Domain of values A4 Quality A5 History A6 Presentation, coding, format Product generation B1 Developer B2 Derivation chain and intermediate validation C Product availability, distribution and usage C1 Provider C2 Applications C3 Maintenance and update C4 Delivery C5 Terms and conditions C6 Support D References D1 Publications D2 Standards E Metadata Existence of quality assessment Validation method Validation datasets Validation results Content analysis Quality indicators a major user requirement The nature of the physical quantities and their units need to be documented The horizontal resolution may not be identified to data quality

A B Product description A1 Identification and nature A2 Domain of definition A3 Domain of values A4 Quality A5 History A6 Presentation, coding, format Product generation B1 Developer B2 Derivation chain and intermediate validation C Product availability, distribution and use C1 Provider C2 Applications C3 Maintenance and update C4 Delivery C5 Terms and conditions C6 Support D References D1 Publications D2 Standards E Mapping with INSPIRE (cont.) Metadata (*) URI URL Any of the following as long as it is a date in the format yyyy-mm-dd First date of data collection Dataset creation date Resource publication date Metadata publication date INSPIRE discovery metadata 1. Identification 2. Classification 3. Keyword 4. Geographic location 5. Temporal reference 6. Quality and validity 7. Conformity 8. Constraint related to access and use 9. Organisation responsible for the establishment, management, maintenance and distribution of spatial data and services 10.Metadata on metadata (*)

Conclusions Various efforts are currently going on to harmonise Earth Observation metadata and comply with the INSPIRE Metadata Regulation Compliance with the principles of QA4EO Integration of metadata models in use (GEOMS, CF) Ability to encompass data depending on any independent variable(s) Proper handling of quality concepts / quality indicators The information content should prevail on formal aspects

Thank you