Usability and Evaluation of BCKOnline PORTAL Prototype Early breast cancer Recurrent Advanced

Similar documents
Hyacinth Macaws for Seniors Survey Report

Usability Report for Online Writing Portfolio

Who we tested [Eight] participants, having the following profile characteristics, evaluated [product name].

Web Evaluation Report Guidelines

A Comparative Usability Test. Orbitz.com vs. Hipmunk.com

Table of Contents. I) Project Planning. User Analysis. III) Tasks Analysis. IV) Storyboard. V) Function Design. VI) Scenario Design.

Usability Testing. November 14, 2016

Running Head: TREE TAP USABILITY TEST 1

assignment #9: usability study and website design

1. Use of Digital Materials Survey

Usability Report. Author: Stephen Varnado Version: 1.0 Date: November 24, 2014

Buddhist Symbols Style Guide

FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS

How to Use the Cancer-Rates.Info/NJ

Stream Features Application Usability Test Report

Usability Testing. November 9, 2016

Usability Test Report for Programming Staff

Core Collection Search Portal Usability Report

This report will document the key themes arising from the testing, and make recommendations for the development of the site.

THE OASIS LUBBOCK: USABILITY TEST REPORT

Handling Your Data in SPSS. Columns, and Labels, and Values... Oh My! The Structure of SPSS. You should think about SPSS as having three major parts.

TIME TO MOVE ON: A CASE STUDY

Interactive Transparent Display. Analyst/Designer. K Robert Clark 1/5/16 Digital Studio Practice

AMERICAN EAGLE. Usability Testing. Page 1 Cover Page 2 Survey Pages 3-4 Sonja Pages 5-6 Danijela. Group 2 12/5/13

The SAPS Johannesburg Area Police Transformation Survey Results

APPENDIX G: Biennial Exhibition Device Survey Questions

Introduction. Heuristic Evaluation. Methods. Heuristics Used

Usability Tests Descriptions

Consumers Energy Usability Testing Report

Introduction to the Publish Content Module

Research Question: Do people perform better on a math task after observing Impressionist art or modern art?

i2b2 User Guide University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute

USABILITY TEST REPORT

Website Evaluation: Yowell Elementary School Library

CUSTOMER PORTAL USER MANUAL. Marketing

Scientist: Andrew Storer

Usability Test Plan for Blogger Mobile Application

Amsterdam Medical Center Department of Medical Informatics. Improve. Usability evaluation of the sign up process of the Improve app

Reviewing and Evaluating your Website

User Testing Study: Collaborizm.com. Jessica Espejel, Megan Koontz, Lauren Restivo. LIS 644: Usability Theory and Practice

A Paper Prototype Usability Study of a Chronic Disease Self-management System for Older Adults

Usability Study: The Key Ingredient in Designing Effective Help Systems

Usability Test Report: Requesting Library Material 1

i2b2 User Guide Informatics for Integrating Biology & the Bedside Version 1.0 October 2012

Issues identified from heuristic evaluations:

Usability test report: Digital Collections 1

Exercise 4 Interview using Paper Prototype

CS Human 2.0 Studio Lo-fi Prototyping & Pilot Usability Test

Tenuta: Strategies for Providing Guidance on Usability and Accessibility

SAMPLE Treatment Perceptions Survey (TPS) Report. XXXXXX County, N=239. (Not Real Data) All Substance Use Treatment Programs Surveyed.

The Website. Teaching Thoughts. Usability Report. By Jon Morris

INSC 588 Human-Computer Interaction. Team Project. Interface Evaluation Using Cognitive Walkthrough

Consumer Insights. YouGov Omnibus, 5 th -6 th April

Public Speaking Goes Mobile

TESTING SOFTWARE QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS

Dhuel Fisher. BookFusion Usability Report

Usability Test Report of ClinNext 10 EHR version 1.0

What is Sherpa? ENTER A LOCATION CHOOSE EQUIPMENT ORDER SERVICE ENJOY MORE FREE TIME. UXD Presentation Peter Zahn

PNC.com, Weather.com & SouthWest.com. Usability Analysis. Tyler A. Steinke May 8, 2014 IMS 413

ehealth literacy and Cancer Screening: A Structural Equation Modeling

Techniques for user adaptive display of information in the Knowledge Sea system

News English.com Ready-to-use ESL / EFL Lessons 2005 was a second longer than usual

Pittsource Instructions: Applying to the Standardized Patient position

PROJECT SUMMARY Our group has chosen to conduct a usability study over

COGNITIVE WALKTHROUGH REPORT. The International Children s Digital Library

Evaluation studies: From controlled to natural settings

Team : Let s Do This CS147 Assignment 7 (Low-fi Prototype) Report

NANOS SURVEY NANOS SURVEY

203CR PORTFOLIO 2. BLOG URL:

IT Coordinator/Lecturer. Do you encounter computer problems?

Data Analysis using SPSS

USABILITY IN HEALTHCARE IT: DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS APPROACHES

Assessing the Usability of an Online New Student Orientation

Guide for New Us TOO Prostate Cancer Support Community Members

1. The Best Practices Section < >

Main challenges for a SAS programmer stepping in SAS developer s shoes

Usability Test Review Final Revisions to Paper Prototype

SFX Label & Options Menu Guerilla Test of SFX Label (round 1) Project Cover Sheet. SFX Label & Options Menu

Tests of difference for two sample designs. Bivariate and multiple regression. Analysis of covariance and multivariate analysis of variance

USABILITY REPORT A REPORT OF USABILITY FINDINGS FOR OFF THE BEATEN PATH WEBSITE

CUSTOMER PORTAL. Micro Survey Guide

Des Moines Area Regional Transit Non Rider Survey

Gender-Inclusive User Interface Guidelines

A short introduction to. designing user-friendly interfaces

Terminology Mind Map Memory Dump (Slide 1) Focus Area Research Process Interpreting Process (Slide 2) Activity 1: Terminology Mind map

Chapter 4. Evaluating Interface Designs

CINAHL Plus with Full Text

Creating a data file and entering data

Allrecipes.com. Sharon Y. Kim IST 616 Final Presentation

Axis labels for graphs could be improved (heuristic violated-visibility of system status):

Introduction to Working with Attribute Data

MiPhone Phone Usage Tracking

ObservAnt Usability Testing Report

Momental. Adrienne I. (Observer) Juliana C. (Computer) Meredith M. (Greeter/Facilitator) Nhien T. (Observer)

Website Usability Study: The American Red Cross. Sarah Barth, Veronica McCoo, Katelyn McLimans, Alyssa Williams. University of Alabama

The first thing you see when you open NVivo is a list of recent projects you have worked with in program. Today we will create a new project.

How to Save the Smart Home from Cyber Invasion. IoT DevCon 2017 Art Swift, President, prpl Foundation

INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED POLICY ANALYSIS TOOL: CAPAT

Mail Findings. Australia Post Consumer Survey. Research into consumer preferences of transactional communications

DY IQX: A ovel Meta-Search Engine for the Web

Transcription:

Usability and Evaluation of BCKOnline PORTAL Prototype Web Site URL: http://130.194.38.233:3400/index.html Participant No: Demographics 1. Please indicate your gender - Male Female 2. Please indicate your age category 15-25 26-35 36-45 46-55 56-55 65+ 3. How experienced are you in using the internet? No experience Limited experience Some experience Very experienced 4. Please indicate how he would classify yourself. General Early breast cancer Recurrent Advanced 5. Were you able to easily conduct a search using this web site? Yes No If you could not please describe why not? 6. Please indicate on the scale by ticking one of the numbered boxes the extent to which you enjoyed using this site High level of enjoyment 5 4 3 2 1 7. What would make you return to this site? Did not enjoy it at all 8. If you could change one thing about the BCKO web pages, what would it be? Please describe 9. Considering what you have seen of the BCKOnline web site, what was the best feature?

10. Considering what you have seen of the BCKOnline web site what was the worst feature? 11. What did you think of the graphics/cartoons on the site? Please describe. 12. Were there any elements that caused confusion or slowed down your retrieval of information? Yes No If yes, describe 13. How much of the information on the BCKOnline site did you actually read (excluding any papers or web sites that you looked at)? Please tick the numbered box. None Skim-read only About Half Most of it All of it 1 2 3 4 5 Search Options The system allows you to search using a number of different ways, please answer the following questions as they relate to the type of searching you did. 14 Did you use the profiles (pictured above)? Yes No If you did please explain why you searched using the profile option? -2-

15. What did you think might happen as a result of using the profiles? Were your expectations met? Describe 16. Did you follow the external links that appeared as a result of your search? No Yes Were the links worth the effort? No Yes 17. Was there information that you felt was not needed? Yes No Describe 18. Indicate by ticking the appropriate circle the level to which you agree or disagree with the following statements. Strongly Neither Agree or Agree Strongly Agree 18.1 I would recommend the system to other women with breast cancer 18.2 I found the screen layout easy to understand 18.3 I found navigating through the BCKOnline website to find the information easy 18.4 The number of steps required to get to the information I wanted was acceptable. 18.5 It was easy to navigate through the BCKOnline website 18.6 Some features I wanted did not exist 18.7 Generally I understood the terminology used on the BCKOnline website 18.8 I always found what I wanted from the web pages 18.9 I felt confident about the reliability and quality of the information provided 18.10 Generally I found the information on the BCKOnline website easy to understand 18.11 The information on the results page of BCKO gave me enough information about the resources 18.12 The information on the BCKOnline website was effectively laid out -3-

About the information 19. What type of search did you find most helpful? General search Individual needs search Disease topics search Please describe why. 20 Please circle the number of the response that best matches your experience. I found the ability to select specific types of information (i.e. medical/ supportive/personal) useful (helpful?) because: 1. It enabled me to retrieve information which was relevant to my immediate needs 2. It allowed me to focus on specific areas 3. It provided me with information that suited my approach to learning about breast cancer 4. It did not really assist me in locating information The Abstract (summary text) 21. Please answer the following questions relating to the abstract by ticking the box to indicate how useful the abstract(s) were (1 not useful at all 5 very useful): 1 2 3 4 5 21.1 provided me with a clear indication as to the content of the individual resource 21.2 enabled me to determine whether the resource may be relevant to me 21.3 enabled me to determine the format of the resource Quality Report 22 Did you understand all the quality information provided on that page? No Yes Describe 23 Did you find the quality information provided on the results page to be useful? No Yes Describe Please circle either yes or no for the following: 24.1 Before deciding to look at a resource I read the quality report Yes No 24.2 I read the quality report after I had looked at the resource Yes No 24.3 I did not read the quality report Yes No -4-

25. On what basis did you judge the quality of one resource you looked at? Please rank (by writing the number next to the item) the following in their order of importance to you author publisher review process purpose references/citations nature of the evidence-base (I m not happy with the way this is phrased) Other 26. I understood what all of the elements in the quality report meant Yes No OR terms which I did not understand were Serendipity 27. Did you locate information which you felt was useful, but which you had not intended searching for? Yes No If yes please describe 28. Are there any other comments you would like to make? (You may use the back of this questionnaire.) -5-