West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions. Downtown Open House and Neighborhood Forum September 11, 2018

Similar documents
Recommendation to Board. Final Action

S-03-SegB: South Federal Way to Fife LRT

MARTA BOARD OF DIRECTORS OCTOBER 4, 2018

System Expansion Implementation Plan. Board Meeting, April 2017

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Project San Jose Downtown Association

Evolution of TOC. Joint Development Program TOD Land Use/Planning Grants Transit Supportive Toolkit Union Station Redevelopment

Feasibility Study Downtown Moorhead Railroad Grade Separation Moorhead, Minnesota July 2008

Reston Town Center North Development. Community Update

Construction Phase Public Outreach Plan

Community Advisory Committee. June 5, 2017

Corridor Management Committee. December 17, 2014

Seattle ITS Resiliency Project. ITS California Jason Cambridge September 19th, 2017

Downtown Boise Multimodal Center

Palm Beach TPA TAC September 5, 2018

Council of State Governments. Takoma Langley Transit Center Purple Line Project Briefing. October 28, 2013

Scoping Information Report

The Maryland Transit Administration. A Plan to Connect Baltimore

Community Update. May 31, 2011

Hennepin Avenue Downtown

Community Update. June 8, 2011

SWLRT Community Advisory Committee Meeting. June 27, 2013

Community Update. June 30, Presented at: York Civic Centre

Maximizing Asset ROI for Self & Clients in a Public Sector Setting. July 16 th San Diego

Stakeholder Engagement Summary Report

NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP): SEGMENT 3

Corridor Management Committee. January 12, 2017

Community Update. June 21, 2011

Dallas Streetcar Central Link Locally Preferred Alternative Selection

Approval of Medical Center New Entrance Agreement

Opportunity: BaltimoreLink

Northwest Needs Improvements Survey

Metrobus 30s Line Enhancements

Business Advisory Committee. October 1, 2013

EXTENDING RED/PURPLE LINE REVENUE SERVICE TO EAST SIDE OF DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES/ARTS DISTRICT

Transportation Research Forum

Denver s Future. City Club of Denver

Creating Dallas-Fort Worth s Transportation System: Celebrating Partnerships and Milestones

Provo-Orem Bus Rapid Transit

Facilities Master Plan Toronto Public Library Board Consultation

Update on 2018 Security Goal Plans and Strategies

Core Capacity Transit Study. San Francisco County Transportation Authority October 17, 2017

Board of Directors April 25, BART The Next 40 Years BART Metro Vision Update Enhancing Service, Capacity and Coverage

STATE STREET CORRIDOR

New York Building Congress May 24, Uday Durg, P.E. Senior Vice President & Chief Engineer MTA Capital

1721 8TH AVENUE NORTH SEATTLE, WA 98109

Building Success through Partnerships

Proposed FY 06 Project Development Program and FY 05 Project Development Program Update

PROJECT TIMELINE. Next steps. Plan. Start of Service

Dupont Circle Escalator Replacement

Downtown Bus Service Review

C Line Rapid Bus 90% Design

SECOND AVENUE SUBWAY PROJECT Managing Construction and its Challenges in One of the Country s Densest Urban Environments

Off- Peak +46% Peak +24% NJT- North New vs. Old. NJT- North New vs. Old. NJT-North Off-Peak cost now 38% higher

Central Corridor. - Central Corridor. Management Committee, Light Rail Transit. Rail-Volution - Weaving Transit into Existing Communities

Executive Director s Report May 23, 2017

JOINT DEVELOPMENT. Partnering to Build Complete Communities Near Transit

Regional Centers Framework Update. Growth Management Policy Board July 6, 2017

North Metro Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Public Hearings. December 9 & 10, 2009

Dallas City Council August 2, Jody Puckett, Assistant City Manager (I) City Manager s Office

GDOT PowerPoint Title Page MMPT. Technical Committee April 6, 2010

Meeting attendees are now required to go through security screenings upon entering the building. Please allow for extra time.

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension

Fairfax County Comprehensive Transit Plan and Transit Development Plan

Westside Subway Extension of the Metro Purple Line

Downtown to NAIT LRT Concept Plan Attachment 4 Public Involvement Summary

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

Corridor Management Committee. January 14, 2016

THE SOUTHERN GATEWAY MANAGED LANES PROJECT. Public Meetings Summer 2015 June 23, June 25, July 7, July 9

Appendix M. Lifeline Sector Coordination

West of Hudson Regional Transit Access Study

VTA s BART Silicon Valley Phase II Extension Santa Clara Community Working Group

DART s Program of Inter-Related Projects. Joint DART and Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee 10 November 2014

I-20 EAST TEXAS CORRIDOR STUDY. TxDOT Planning Conference, Corpus Christi June 4 th, 2014

Bill Jackson Asst. Statewide Utility Engineer, Office of Construction MDOT SHA

Q1 Meetings are currently held at the Seattle JTF, would you like to see the location of the meeting changed or rotated to improve attendance?

GATEWAY. Action Plan JULY Gateway Action Plan DRAFT - July Portland Development Commission

Memorandum CITY OF DALLAS

Transportation & Mobility

Girard Siding Environmental Assessment (EA) Public Meeting. May 23, 2013

vision42

LIVABLE CENTERS INITIATIVE THE ATLANTA EXPERIENCE. Amy Goodwin Alabama Planning Association Conference May 2, 2013

Record of Public Comment on Central Corridor SDEIS

Regional Transit System (RTS) BRT Feasibility Study Project Kick-Off. Project Management Team Meeting May 22, 2008

Oregon House Transportation & Economic Development Committee

METRO SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN FY Executive Summary May 2009 DIVERSIFIED TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS

Multimodal TOD Principles for Denver Union Station Rail~Volution November 7, 2006

Request for Qualifications For Consultants to Prepare a Form-Based Code City of University Place, Washington

Welcome! Visioning Workshop. 24 March 2015

Bus Circulator Feasibility Study Scope of Work March 12, 2018

EPA Near-port Community Capacity Building: Tools and Technical Assistance for Collaborative Solutions

Girard Siding Environmental Assessment (EA) Public Meeting. May 23, 2013

Managing DC Work Zones via a Citywide Transportation Management Plan. ITE Mid-Colonial District Annual Meeting May 20, 2014

South Central Pennsylvania Regional Operations Plan Candidate Project Listing (DRAFT)

1.1. Driving Around Euclid. Goals. Launch 1.1

Public Outreach Overview Tuesday, September 27. COTA William J. Lhota Building 33 N. High St. Columbus, OH 43215

Looking Ahead. A Context for the Next Twenty Year Needs Assessment. July 2013

Commercial Broadway Station Phase 2 Upgrades

Phase Two: Plan Recommendations Public Comment Summary Report June 23, 2016

November 28, 2012 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PUBLIC MEETING

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza 2i3.g Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA metro.net

Transcription:

West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions Downtown Open House and Neighborhood Forum September 11, 2018

Agenda Why we re here today Alternatives development overview What we heard in Level 1 Level 2 alternatives evaluation Neighborhood forum overview 2

Why we re here today To share and hear your input on the current alternatives for Link light rail How to participate: 1. Learn about the alternatives 2. Share your input Neighborhood forum Comment forms 3

Your input matters 1. Summarized and shared with: 1. Project team 2. Stakeholder Advisory Group 3. Elected Leadership Group 4. Sound Transit Board 2. SAG and ELG to provide recommendation for what is studied in Level 3 4

1. Learn Alternatives development overview 5

ST3 Representative project Identifies mode, corridor, number of stations, general station locations Informs cost, schedule, operating needs 6

West Seattle Link Extension Opening 2030 Four elevated stations at SODO, Delridge, Avalon and Alaska Junction; one at-grade station at Stadium New rail-only fixed span crossing of the Duwamish River Length: 4.7 miles

Ballard Link Extension Opening 2035 Three elevated stations: Ballard, Interbay, Smith Cove Six tunnel stations: Seattle Center, South Lake Union, Denny, Westlake, Midtown, International District/Chinatown New rail-only movable bridge over Salmon Bay Length: 7.1 miles

Project timeline 9

Screening process Broad range of initial alternatives Refine remaining alternatives Further evaluation Preferred Alternative and other EIS alternatives 10

Community engagement and collaboration 11

What we heard in Level 1 12

Overview Overview Early scoping: Feb. 2 March 5 Notification via postcards, advertisements, project website, email updates, press releases, social media, agency invitation letters, etc. 3 public meetings in Feb. Online open house 1 agency meeting Other methods to comment 13

Neighborhood forums Focused on neighborhood issues and opportunities 4/21: Chinatown / International District 4/23: Denny / SLU / Seattle Center 5/2: Midtown / Westlake 5/5: Delridge / Avalon / Alaska Junction 5/9: SODO / Stadium 5/12: Ballard / Interbay / Smith Cove 14

Level 2 alternatives evaluation 15

Measures and methods 50+ quantitative and/or qualitative measures Rating thresholds for High, Medium and Low Key differentiators and findings Lower Performing Medium Performing Higher Performing 16

Level 2 cost assessment Purpose: To inform comparison of Level 2 alternatives Comparative costs by segment Consistent methodology (2017$; construction, real estate, etc.) Based on limited conceptual design (less than 5% design) Final project budget established at 60% design (~ 2024) Costs for end-to-end alternatives in Level 3 17

Financial constraints ST3 Plan budget based on 2014 conceptual cost estimates Significant recent escalation in construction and real estate costs Level 2 cost assessment provides basis for comparison of alternatives within a segment Level 3 end-to-end alternatives will facilitate comparison to ST3 budget Be mindful of financial realities when considering Level 2 recommendations 18

1 2 Map of alternatives Key differentiators 3 Summary 19

Level 2 alternatives Downtown ST3 Representative Project 5th/Harrison 6th/Boren/Roy 5th/Terry/Roy/Mercer 20

Downtown Level 2 alternatives 21

Midtown-Westlake-Denny-SLU Seattle Center Downtown Key differentiators By sub-segment 22

Midtown-Westlake-Denny-SLU: Key differentiators Station location Bus-rail integration Engineering constraints Downtown Key differentiators Midtown-Westlake-Denny-SLU 23

Key differentiators Midtown-Westlake-Denny-SLU Alternative ST3 Representative Project Key differentiators 5 th /Harrison Better bus/rail integration opportunity at SLU station on Harrison 6th/Boren/Roy Avoids building foundation tie-backs on 5 th Ave, SR 99 portal and sewer More constrained Denny station on Boren 5th/Terry/Roy/Mercer Avoids SR 99 portal and sewer 24

Seattle Center: Key differentiators Station location Property effects Bus-rail integration Portal location Downtown Key differentiators Seattle Center 25

Key differentiators Seattle Center Alternative ST3 Representative Project Key differentiators 5 th /Harrison Tunnel station on Harrison, west of soon-to-be-renovated Key Arena Engineering challenges with tunneling under Key Arena Property effects due to tunnel portal location on Harrison 6th/Boren/Roy Tunnel station on Roy, two blocks from Key Arena Lower bus/rail integration opportunity at Seattle Center station on Roy 5th/Terry/Roy/Mercer Tunnel station on Mercer, one block from Key Arena 26

Summary Downtown Alternative Key findings Cost comparison* Schedule comparison* ST3 Representative Project 6th/Boren/Roy Avoids building tie-backs on 5 th Ave, SR 99 portal and sewer More constrained Denny station location on Boren Seattle Center station location on Roy, two blocks from Key Arena Lower bus/rail integration opportunity at Seattle Center station on Roy Similar Higher Performing 5 th /Harrison Better bus/rail integration opportunity at SLU station on Harrison Higher property effects due to tunnel portal location on Harrison west of Seattle Center Engineering challenges with tunneling under Key Arena + $200M Higher Performing 5 th /Terry/Roy/ Mercer Avoids SR 99 portal and sewer Seattle Center station location on Mercer, one block from Key Arena + $200M Higher Performing *Cost compared to cost of ST3 Representative Project for this segment. Schedule compared to overall ST3 schedule for this extension. 27

Level 2 alternatives SODO/Chinatown-ID ST3 Representative Project Massachusetts Tunnel Portal Surface E-3 4th Avenue Cut-and-Cover C-ID 4th Avenue Mined C-ID 5th Avenue Mined C-ID Occidental Avenue 28

ST3 Representative Project Massachusetts Tunnel Portal Surface E-3 SODO and Chinatown-ID Level 2 alternatives 1 of 3 29

4 th Avenue Cut-and-Cover C-ID 4 th Avenue Mined C-ID 5 th Avenue Mined C-ID SODO and Chinatown-ID Level 2 alternatives 2 of 3 30

Occidental Avenue SODO and Chinatown-ID Level 2 alternatives 3 of 3 31

SODO Chinatown-ID SODO and Chinatown-ID Key differentiators By sub-segment 32

SODO: Key differentiators New SODO Station location Transfer with existing station Engineering/ constructability issues Bus operations Property effects Rail, traffic & freight operations SODO and Chinatown-ID Key differentiators SODO-Stadium 33

Summary SODO Alternative ST3 Representative Project Key findings Cost comparison* Schedule comparison* Surface E-3 Massachusetts Tunnel Portal New at-grade SODO Station on E-3 transitway at Lander Transfer at existing SODO Station Bus operations on E-3 transitway displaced New grade-separated roadway crossings (Lander, Holgate) improve existing rail/traffic/freight operations Property effects at tunnel portal site (for Massachusetts Tunnel Portal alternative only) Massachusetts Tunnel Portal alternative avoids impacts to Ryerson Base - $100M ** Higher Performing Higher Performing Occidental Ave. New elevated SODO Station on Occidental Ave at Lander Transfer at existing Stadium Station Long span bridges over BNSF tracks and longer track connection to maintenance facility Bus operations on E-3 transitway partially displaced Property effects along Occidental, BNSF crossings and maintenance facility connection + $200M Higher Performing *Cost compared to cost of ST3 Representative Project for this SODO sub-segment only. Schedule compared to overall ST3 schedule for this extension. **Cost comparison reflected in Chinatown/ID summary table. 34

Chinatown-International District: Key differentiators Station location Ease of station access/passenger transfers Construction, traffic effects Property effects Viaduct re-build project issues SODO and Chinatown-ID Key differentiators Chinatown-International District 35

Summary Chinatown-ID Alternative Key findings Cost comparison* Schedule comparison* ST3 Representative Project E-3 Surface (shorter 5 th Ave Cut-and- Cover Tunnel) Shallow cut-and-cover station under 5 th Ave; easy rider access/transfers Construction effects, lane closures on 5 th Ave in station area - $300M** Higher Performing Massachusetts Tunnel Portal (5 th Ave Bored Tunnel) Shallow cut-and-cover station under 5 th Ave; easy rider access/transfers Construction effects, lane closures on 5 th Ave in station area - $200M Higher Performing 5 th Ave Mined C-ID Deep mined station (~200 ) under 5 th Ave; poor rider access/transfers Less construction effects, lane closures on 5 th Ave with mined station Some property effects (for mined station access shaft) Results in very deep Midtown Station (~250 ) Similar Medium Performing 4 th Ave Mined C-ID Deep mined station (~200 ) under 4 th Ave, poor rider access/transfers Major engineering/constructability constraints (4 th Ave viaduct demolition/rebuild, active BNSF railway, existing transit tunnel, etc.) Large property effects (Ryerson Base for tunnel portal site) Requires 3 rd party funding of 4 th Ave Viaduct re-buildcosts Results in very deep Midtown Station (~250 ) + $500M Lower Performing 4 th Ave Cut-and-Cover C-ID Shallow cut-and-cover station under 4 th Ave; easy rider access/transfers Major engineering/constructability constraints (4 th Ave viaduct demolition/rebuild, active BNSF railway, existing transit tunnel, etc.) Large property effects (King County Admin Building) Requires 3 rd party funding of 4 th Ave Viaduct re-buildcosts + $600M Lower Performing *Cost compared to cost of ST3 Representative Project for this segment. Schedule compared to overall ST3 schedule for this extension. **Cost comparison for Chinatown/ID sub-segment only; total SODO/C-ID segment cost difference is - $400M compared to ST3 Representative Project. 36

* Station Charrette Feedback Seattle Center Station Harrison St Tunnel Good location to serve Key Arena, but concern about connection to broader Seattle Center Farthest from Heart of Uptown, but serves core of up-zoned neighborhood Good transit integration Good non-motorized access Good TOD potential Republican St Tunnel Location serves Seattle Center, Key Arena, and Uptown Good opportunities for station entries integrated into existing buildings Good transit integration and non-motorized access High urban design potential Mercer St Tunnel Location serves Uptown well, but concern about legibility of connection to Seattle Center Good opportunities for station entries integrated into buildings on Mercer Excellent transit integration Good non-motorized access Good TOD potential Roy St Tunnel Location serves Uptown, but concern about legibility of connection to Seattle Center Some opportunities for station entries integrated into buildings Challenging for transit integration and nonmotorized access *Summary of feedback from agency and community stakeholders. Images are illustrative only. 37

* Station Charrette Feedback South Lake Union Station Harrison St Tunnel Good location to serve South Lake Union, Gates Foundation, east entrance of Seattle Center Good opportunities for station entries integrated into new or existing buildings Excellent transit integration for buses traveling on SR 99 Good non-motorized access through existing and planned facilities Blah Republican St Tunnel Challenging location due to SR 99 adjacency Serves SLU but not Gates Foundation or Seattle Center Limited opportunities for station entries integrated into new or existing buildings Poor transit integration for buses traveling on SR 99 Poor non-motorized access due to truncated walkshed Roy St Tunnel Challenging location due to SR 99 Serves north end of SLU, but provides good connection to Lake Union as well as Queen Anne Good opportunities for station entries integrated into new buildings Challenging for transit integration; would require reconfiguration of SR 99 bus lanes Challenging for non-motorized access *Summary of feedback from agency and community stakeholders. Images are illustrative only. 38

* Station Charrette Feedback Denny Station Westlake Ave Tunnel Good location to serve Amazon HQ and new Denny Triangle development Good opportunities for station entries integrated into public space and/or buildings Excellent transit integration Excellent non-motorized access Concerns about construction impacts on traffic and streetcar operations Blah Terry Ave N Tunnel Good location to serve Cascade neighborhood Good opportunities for station entries integrated into new and/or existing buildings Challenging for transit integration Good non-motorized access, with opportunity to negotiate grade on Denny through hill climbs or escalators in station Boren Ave N Tunnel Not further developed in charrette Farthest from densest part of Denny Triangle Constrained by brand-new development, but some opportunity to locate station entries in triangular parcels Challenging for transit integration Challenging for non-motorized access; at top of steep grade on Denny *Summary of feedback from agency and community stakeholders. Images are illustrative only. 39

* Station Charrette Feedback Chinatown-ID 5th Ave S Tunnel Cut and Cover Greatest concern about construction effects to C-ID neighborhood and displacement of businesses Less opportunity to connect to King Street Station Could activate Union Station and plaza Some TOD potential 5th Ave S Tunnel Mined Less concern about construction effects Less opportunity to connect to King Street Station Could activate Union Station and plaza Could span Jackson Street Some TOD potential 4 th Ave S Tunnel Cut and Cover Concern about construction effects to traffic with 4 th Ave S viaduct rebuild Opportunity to connect to King Street Station services Could activate Union Station Limited TOD potential 4 th Ave S Tunnel Mined Concern about construction effects to traffic with 4 th Ave S viaduct rebuild Opportunity to connect to King Street Station services via station mezzanine Could activate Union Station Limited TOD potential *Summary of feedback from agency and community stakeholders. Images are illustrative only. 40

Neighborhood forum: small group discussion

Small group discussion: part 1 Purpose: Initial thoughts and questions about the alternatives Discussion topics: o Meet your neighbors o What do you like about the alternatives and why? o What do you dislike about the alternatives and why? Quick break

BREAK

Small group discussion: part 2 Purpose: Share input for each sub-segment Discussion topics: o What are your thoughts on station location options? Complete table notecards Visit other tables

Thank you! soundtransit.org/wsblink