Network Working Group. Intended status: Standards Track Columbia U. Expires: March 5, 2009 September 1, 2008

Similar documents
Expires: October 9, 2005 April 7, 2005

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4573 Category: Standard Track July MIME Type Registration for RTP Payload Format for H.

Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-00.

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June 2005

Network Working Group Internet-Draft January 25, 2006 Expires: July 29, Feed Rank draft-snell-atompub-feed-index-05.txt. Status of this Memo

Network Working Group Internet-Draft August 2005 Expires: February 2, Atom Link No Follow draft-snell-atompub-feed-nofollow-03.

Network Working Group Internet-Draft October 27, 2007 Intended status: Experimental Expires: April 29, 2008

Intended status: Standards Track August 15, 2008 Expires: February 16, 2009

Network Working Group. BCP: 131 July 2007 Category: Best Current Practice

Expires in six months 24 October 2004 Obsoletes: RFC , , 3377, 3771

Request for Comments: 4571 Category: Standards Track July 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4424 February 2006 Updates: 4348 Category: Standards Track

Request for Comments: 5179 Category: Standards Track May 2008

Jabber, Inc. August 20, 2004

Category: Standards Track December 2007

Network Working Group. Obsoletes: 3555 March 2007 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track August Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Remote-ID Option

Intended status: Informational. B. Wyman October 2, 2007

Intended status: Standards Track Expires: August 28, 2008 Hitachi A. Kobayashi NEC Corp. M. Stiemerling (Ed.) NEC Europe Ltd.

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4060 Category: Standards Track May 2005

Category: Standards Track Cisco H. Tschofenig Nokia Siemens Networks August 2008

Request for Comments: 4633 Category: Experimental August 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Informational May OSPF Database Exchange Summary List Optimization

Category: Standards Track September MIB Textual Conventions for Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Updates: 2409 May 2005 Category: Standards Track. Algorithms for Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1)

Request for Comments: 5010 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. September 2007

Category: Standards Track June 2006

Category: Standards Track October Vendor-Identifying Vendor Options for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol version 4 (DHCPv4)

Request for Comments: Columbia U. November 2000

TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (tcpm) Intended status: Standards Track Expires: May 1, 2009 October 28, 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track June Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6) Relay Agent Subscriber-ID Option

Request for Comments: May 2007

Request for Comments: 4393 Category: Standards Track March MIME Type Registrations for 3GPP2 Multimedia Files

Category: Standards Track June Requesting Attributes by Object Class in the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Status of This Memo

Request for Comments: K. Norrman Ericsson June 2006

Request for Comments: 3934 Updates: 2418 October 2004 BCP: 94 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group. Cisco Systems June 2007

IETF TRUST. Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents. Approved November 6, Effective Date: November 10, 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4869 Category: Informational May Suite B Cryptographic Suites for IPsec. Status of This Memo

Network Working Group Request for Comments: August Address-Prefix-Based Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks August 2008

Category: Standards Track May Transport Layer Security Protocol Compression Methods

Request for Comments: 5369 Category: Informational October Framework for Transcoding with the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

Network Working Group. Category: Informational January 2006

Network Working Group. N. Williams Sun Microsystems June 2006

Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track January 2008

IETF TRUST. Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents. February 12, Effective Date: February 15, 2009

Request for Comments: 5079 Category: Standards Track December Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)

Request for Comments: 5208 Category: Informational May 2008

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Samsung S. Kumar Tech Mahindra Ltd S. Madanapalli Samsung May 2008

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc January The Secure Shell (SSH) Session Channel Break Extension

Intended Category: Standards Track Expires March 2006 September 2005

Category: Standards Track March Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Transport Over TCP

September The Internet Assigned Number Authority (IANA) tel Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) Parameter Registry. Status of This Memo

Request for Comments: 4680 Updates: 4346 September 2006 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4242 Category: Standards Track University of Southampton B. Volz Cisco Systems, Inc.

Network Working Group. February 2005

Network Working Group. Updates: 3463, 4468, 4954 June 2008 Category: Best Current Practice. A Registry for SMTP Enhanced Mail System Status Codes

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4143 Category: Standards Track Brandenburg November 2005

Internet-Draft November 12, 2005 Obsoletes: 3548 (if approved) Expires: May 16, 2006

Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems, Inc. March 2005

C. Martin ipath Services February A Policy Control Mechanism in IS-IS Using Administrative Tags

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track July 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: February 2006

Request for Comments: 4315 December 2005 Obsoletes: 2359 Category: Standards Track. Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - UIDPLUS extension

Category: Informational September 2004

Request for Comments: 4755 Category: Standards Track December 2006

Category: Standards Track Juniper Networks E. Rosen Cisco Systems, Inc. August MPLS Upstream Label Assignment and Context-Specific Label Space

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5167 Category: Informational Polycom March 2008

Category: Standards Track Redback Networks June 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5235 January 2008 Obsoletes: 3685 Category: Standards Track

Request for Comments: 4255 Category: Standards Track SPARTA January Using DNS to Securely Publish Secure Shell (SSH) Key Fingerprints

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 5372 Category: Standards Track Sony October 2008

Request for Comments: 4715 Category: Informational NTT November 2006

Request for Comments: 4759 Category: Standards Track Neustar Inc. L. Conroy Roke Manor Research November 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4603 Category: Informational Cisco Systems July Additional Values for the NAS-Port-Type Attribute

Category: Experimental June 2006

Network Working Group. Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems May 2007

INTERNET-DRAFT DTLS over DCCP February 6, DTLS over DCCP

Request for Comments: 3905 Category: Informational September A Template for IETF Patent Disclosures and Licensing Declarations

Isode Limited March 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4432 March 2006 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. December 2005

vcard Extensions for Instant Messaging (IM)

Category: Standards Track LabN Consulting, LLC July 2008

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 3937 Category: Informational October 2004

Network Working Group. Juniper Networks January Maximum Transmission Unit Signalling Extensions for the Label Distribution Protocol

Request for Comments: 3968 Updates: 3427 December 2004 BCP: 98 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Category: Standards Track G. Neville-Neil Neville-Neil Consulting December 2007

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4558 Category: Standards Track Cisco Systems D. Papadimitriou Alcatel June 2006

Category: Standards Track October 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4913 Category: Experimental July 2007

Wave7 Optics Richard Brennan Telxxis LLC

Request for Comments: January 2007

Request for Comments: 3932 October 2004 BCP: 92 Updates: 3710, 2026 Category: Best Current Practice

Network Working Group Request for Comments: Cisco Systems, Inc. June 2006

Network Working Group Request for Comments: 4792 Updates: 3641 January 2007 Category: Standards Track

Network Working Group Request for Comments: A. Zinin Alcatel-Lucent March OSPF Out-of-Band Link State Database (LSDB) Resynchronization

Transcription:

Network Working Group O. Boyaci Internet-Draft H. Schulzrinne Intended status: Standards Track Columbia U. Expires: March 5, 2009 September 1, 2008 RTP Payload Format for Portable Network Graphics (PNG) image draft-boyaci-avt-png-00 Status of this Memo By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she becomes aware will be disclosed, in accordance with Section 6 of BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on March 5, 2009. Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 1]

Abstract This document describes how to carry Portable Network Graphics (PNG) images in RTP packets. Table of Contents 1. Introduction......................... 3 2. Requirements Notation.................... 4 3. Payload Format........................ 5 3.1. RTP Header Usage..................... 5 4. SDP Parameters........................ 6 5. Security Considerations................... 7 6. Normative References..................... 8 Authors' Addresses........................ 9 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements.......... 10 Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 2]

1. Introduction PNG is a bitmapped image format that employs lossless data compression. PNG is standartized in ISO/IEC 15948:2003 and the W3C's PNG (Second Edition) Recommendation [W3C.REC-PNG-20031110]. Client applications may display PNG images carried in RTP as a slideshow. Application and desktop sharing systems MAY use PNG images to carry screen updates. Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 3]

2. Requirements Notation The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 4]

3. Payload Format For RTP-based transport of PNG images, the standard RTP header is followed by the payload data. There is no payload header. The payload data contains the PNG image. Each RTP packets carries a single PNG image or a fragment of a PNG image. 3.1. RTP Header Usage Marker Bit: The marker bit is used to indicate the last packet part of a PNG image. PNG images may not fit into a single RTP packet. This enables the client to finish decoding the image, where it otherwise may need to wait for the next packet to explicitly know that. The M bit is set to one to indicate that the RTP packet payload contains a complete PNG image or contains the final fragment of a PNG image. Timestamp: For PNG image streams, the RTP timestamp is based on a 90-kHz clock. If a PNG image occupies more than one packet, the timestamp SHALL be the same on all of those packets. Furthermore, the initial value of the timestamp MUST be random (unpredictable) to make known-plaintext attacks on encryption more difficult; see RTP [RFC3550]. The remaining RTP header fields are used as specified in RFC 3550. Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 5]

4. SDP Parameters The MIME media type image/png string is mapped to fields in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) as follows: The media name in the "m=" line of SDP MUST be image. The encoding name in the "a=rtpmap" line of SDP MUST be png (the MIME subtype). Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 6]

5. Security Considerations RTP packets using the payload format defined in this specification are subject to the security considerations discussed in the RTP specification [RFC3550]. Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 7]

6. Normative References [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3550] Schulzrinne, H., Casner, S., Frederick, R., and V. Jacobson, "RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications", STD 64, RFC 3550, July 2003. [W3C.REC-PNG-20031110] Duce, D., "Portable Network Graphics (PNG) Specification (Second Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-PNG-20031110, November 2003, <http://www.w3.org/tr/2003/rec-png-20031110>. Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 8]

Authors' Addresses Omer Boyaci Columbia University Dept. of Computer Science 1214 Amsterdam Avenue New York, NY 10027 US Email: boyaci@cs.columbia.edu Henning Schulzrinne Columbia University Dept. of Computer Science 1214 Amsterdam Avenue New York, NY 10027 US Email: schulzrinne@cs.columbia.edu Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 9]

Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Boyaci & Schulzrinne Expires March 5, 2009 [Page 10]