The Practicalities of Form-Based Codes. (and How They re Being Applied in Albany)

Similar documents
form-based codes to enable urbanism

FORM-BASED CODES IN THE WEST. Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute March 2007

AGREEMENT FOR 520 SECTOR PLAN ADDENDUM 2: ADDITIONAL SERVICE CODE STREAMLINING PROJECT

CodeNEXT Overview August 19, Code Development Team

DEVELOPING FORM-BASED CODES

City Avenue District. City Avenue Rezoning Workshop January 25, :30 p.m. Board of Commissioners

Form-Based Codes: The Basics. Jorge E. Rousselin COA Planning and Development Review Urban Design

Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Form Based Codes

FORM-BASED CODE WHY DOES THE ZONING CODE MATTER?

TRANSIT CENTER DISTRICT PLAN

Columbia Pike. Dover, Kohl & Partners Geoffrey Ferrell Associates

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING LAND PRESERVATION FOREST CONSERVATION GIS AGENDA

Zoning Ordinance Update

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: 6 STAFF: CARL SCHEULER FILE NO: CPC CA LEGISLATIVE

St. Helena Island 5-6 December,

DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF LAWRENCE, KANSAS TEXT AMENDMENTS, MAY 4, 2010 EDITION. Amending Sections and

An Introduction to Form Based Codes

Standish Corner Village. The Future Village: By Choice or By Chance? Today

Reston Town Center North Development. Community Update

Applications & Conversion Requests in the Study Area (North side of Dupont Street: Ossington Avenue - Kendal Avenue)

R1 Variation Zones. CODE AMENDMENT Q&A UPDATE October 6, 2016 CPC CA ENV ND. Department of City Planning

Form-Based Zoning: A research paper for the Town of Mammoth Lakes. Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company, Sky Florida

ARTS DISTRICT 2018 E. 8 TH STREET, LOS ANGELES, CA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

The Rules That Shape Urban Form

Section Table of Permissible Uses

Sense of Place Council & the The MI Place Partnership Initiative

GORE BUILDING. 238 N. Massachusetts Avenue, Lakeland, FL 33801

In recent years, many communities disappointed with the

Approval of Navy Yard Chiller Joint Development Agreement

S542: Combining Form-Based and Conventional Code Elements

VILLAGE OF SOUTHAMPTON

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Approval to Negotiate and Execute a Term Sheet for the Navy Yard Chiller Site Joint Development

SITE DESCRIPTION. Vicinity

GATEWAY. Action Plan JULY Gateway Action Plan DRAFT - July Portland Development Commission

CITY OF FORT COLLINS TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING FINDINGS AND DECISION. Ryan Sagar 1196 Grant Street, Suite 313 Denver, CO 80203

An Introduction to Form-Based Codes

REVIEW OF REGIONAL GROWTH CENTER APPLICATION

Request Conditional Use Permit (Colleges & Universities, public or private) Staff Planner Ashby Moss

Summary Information. Demographic Profile

GEORGETOWN DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT

RSO P P P P P P P P P P P P P

TELECOMMUNICATIONS SPECIAL USE WIRELESS

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor

Lacey Woodland District Regulatory Strategy

Environmental Impact Questionnaire

Caretaker s accommodation code. District centre zone. District centre zone. code Applicable local plan code Dual occupancy code The planning scheme

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -- Public Hearing Item

PUBLIC WORKS ORGANIZATIONAL CHART

BUTLER COUNTY, KANSAS ZONING REGULATIONS. Sections: 1-1 Title Purpose Jurisdiction Sections: 2-1 Administration...

Introduction. We are excited about the possibility of bringing Google Fiber to your city and look forward to working with you.

EASTSIDE CITY OF BELLEVUE/ PRIVATE PRIVATE PRIVATE MULTI-PRIVATE MULTI-PRIVATE

MARINA PARK PUBLIC ART AT FLAG PLAZA

September Code Approach Alternatives Annotated Outlines Austin Land Development Code Update

Integrating Travel Demand Management into the Long-Range Planning Process 2017 AMPO

FOR SALE Development Land

Adopted by La Mesa City Council July 9, 2013 Resolution

Hennepin Avenue Downtown

Municipal Service Park 3 December Consolidation of City services to one centralized complex

Adoption of the Town of Putnam Valley Comprehensive Plan and the Future Adoption of Zoning and Subdivision Amendments to Implement the Plan

26 th Street North and Old Dominion Drive Master Planning Task Force

Planning Department Civic Center North 470 South Allison Parkway Lakewood, Colorado TTY/TDD Lakewood.

LIST OF AMENDMENTS TO ZONING BYLAW NO. 801, 1999

American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 570. Making Great Communities Happen

Applicant Type (Conditional Use Permit, Variance, Tract Map, etc.): Applicant: Address: Phone(s): Fax:

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 2016

Form-Based Codes: A Step-by-Step Guide for Communities

CREATING CRITICAL MASS IN THE URBAN CORE

APPENDIX A TDM Development Guideline

A HISTORY, EVOLUTION AND APPLICATION OF FORM-BASED CODES LAUREN M. GOWDY A REPORT. submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree

Request for Qualifications For Consultants to Prepare a Form-Based Code City of University Place, Washington

Downtown Clawson Master Plan

2. An increase in the R1H1 Residential Floor Area Ratios to a range of (the column highlighted in lavender on the attached table).

EXISTING STRUCTURE 2252 THIRD AVENUE

Denver Moves: Transit Task Force

Ordinance No. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS:

MARTA Transit Oriented Development Update Regional Transit Committee Thursday, May 14, 2015

AN INTOWN NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE OCCURS

Newmark Cornish & Carey. Download your free your appstore. barcode app from /17

Unified Development Code. Public Workshop No. 3 November 7, 2017

Building: Residential Instructions

Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Secretary. Word Processor. Streets and Facilities Supervisor. Traffic Signal Technician.

210,000 rsf Typical floorplate 67,549 rsf

Westbard Concept Framework Plan Presentation. Workshop Wrap up November 18, November 18 Concept Framework Plan

BENTON COUNTY CODE BENTON COUNTY CODE TABLE OF CONTENTS - COMPLETE CHAPTER 3.04 BCC RESTRICTIONS ORD. 386, EFFECTIVE DOGS AND DANGEROUS DOGS

vision42

APPENDIX L. Aesthetics Technical Appendix

F O R S A L E 2 Acre Outparcel Four Lane Exposure Gateway Corridor to Downtown 0 Kathleen Road, Lakeland, Florida 33801

FOR LEASE. 300 SF Executive Suite with River View in Fort Pierce, Florida. 200 S. Indian River Dr., Fort Pierce, FL 34950

LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF LAWRENCE, KANSAS, TEXT AMENDMENTS, SEPTEMBER 11, 2012, EDITION. Amending Article 4, Section

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 20, 2014

Form-Based Codes: Lessons Learned from a Mount Holly, NJ Case Study

Downtown Lakeland Office Space For Lease

Chicago is Rural: The Inconsistencies and Absurdities of Street Connectivity Indices Paul Knight Georgia Tech MCRP Option Paper March 1, 2011

Next Steps. Investing in the Future of. MASTER DEVELOPER PROCUREMENT OVERVIEW October 2016 July Chicago Union Station Chicago Union Station

PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION

FOR SALE BANK OWNED OFFICE CENTRAL LAKELAND HISTORIC DISTRICT

The Summit s location is spot on. We just love it here. Bill Hancock, Executive Director College Football Playoff

Peoria County Front Desk Map Application

Transcription:

The Practicalities of Form-Based Codes (and How They re Being Applied in Albany) Victor Dover, FAICP Dover, Kohl & Partners Don Elliott, FAICP Clarion Associates The same and yet so different. 1

La Palma Offices Hotel St. Michel Built as a hotel, 1924 Built as offices, 1926 Segregation of Land Uses = Default Setting of Sprawl 2

Build-To Line Setback 3

Form-Based Code A method of regulating development to achieve a specific urban form. Form-Based Codes create a predictable public realm by controlling physical form primarily, and land uses secondarily, through city or county regulations. Specifying Urban Form Santa Fe, planned 1610 Law of the Indies, 1573 4

NYC: 1916-1964 NYC: 1916-1964 5

The trouble with F.A.R. F.A.R. 1.0 The trouble with density 6

Test: Does your ordinance emphasize administrative processes and measuring quantities (building square footage, density, parking spaces) instead of specifying building-to-street relationships and design fundamentals? Redevelopment 7

Greenfield Development Historic Places 8

Transit-Oriented Development The Illustrative Plan 9

The Regulating Plan Building Form Standards 10

Building Form Standards 11

Lot Types Type XI Workplace Building Sites Type IX Shopfront Building Sites Type VII Townhouse Building Sites Building Types 12

Transect Zones The Regulating Plan 13

Transect Rural Urban Core Edge General Center Origins of the Transect Idea James Wassell, DPZ 14

Key Ideas Design Matters FBC Implements a Vision/Plan for the Area Regulating Building-to-Street Relationships Physical Features (Streets, Building Types, Transect Zones) are the Organizing System How Are They Being Implemented? Form-based Ideas are Being Used in a Wide Variety of Ways 15

How Are They Being Implemented? Adopted Codes are Not Arranged on a Linear Spectrum from Weak to Strong Instead, Each City is Choosing to Adopt Those Portions Best Suited to their Planning Goals How Are They Being Implemented? RTSUF Comparison List FBCI Core Elements List o o o o o o Regulating Plan Building Types Frontage Types Civic Space Types Block and Subdivision Standards By-right Development o o o o o o Regulating Plan Building Form Standards Building Type Standards Frontage Type Standards Public Space Standards Block and Subdivision Standards 16

How Are They Being Implemented? Austin Mooresville Denver MS Arlington Livermore Miami Building Types Frontage Types Public Space Standards Block & Subdivision Regulating Plans By Right Development Key Questions 1. Will the form controls cover the entire community, or just certain areas? 17

Key Questions Kevin Lynch s Key Elements in How We Understand Cities There are Places and places and many places do not need form-based controls Key Questions 2. If form based controls will apply only to a specific area, is there a plan for that area? Is the plan more than a drawing? Be careful of locking in too much detail 18

Key Questions 3. Will the form based controls be mandatory or optional? Many current codes are optional (parallel codes or floating zones) Mandatory codes may be harder to adopt Optional codes may make administration harder Key Questions 4. Are the Form based Controls for Greenfield, Major Redevelopment, of Infill Redevelopment Sites? Greenfield sites If one owner or cooperating owners, good to go. Really a more disciplined PUD. Major redevelopment sites If one owner or cooperating owners, you re lucky. Watch out for proposals to reinvent street patterns they often require re-subdivision, relocation of utilities, money. Will the new controls apply before the new streets are in place? Small infill redevelopment sites over time Don t make the current owners nonconforming. Assume random timing/location of individual projects. Don t require neighbors to prepare a joint regulating plan before proceeding. 19

Key Questions 5. How will you treat existing development that doesn t meet the form based standards? DON T put them in zoning parole -- nonconformities The greenest building is the one that has already been built Remember to Lighten Up on Use Controls Uses Process Form Uses Process Form Uses Process Form Form-based Zoning Grows Up Clarion Associates 20

Form-Based Codes The Albany Unified Sustainable Development Code The Albany USDO Answers to the Key Questions 1. Four Specific Areas Not Citywide 2. Yes, there is a Plan for Each of the Four Areas 3. Form-based Controls are Mandatory (not Optional) 4. Mostly Infill and Maybe Major Redevelopment (not Greenfield) 5. Existing Development Protected 1. New Building Must Comply 2. Expansions to Existing Buildings Must Reduce Nonconformities. 21

FBC, one area at a time Waterfront Central Ave UAlbany South End frontage standards DRAFT 22

Warehouse District opening night hands-on workshop Warehouse District, Albany 23

open studio meetings 24

one word that comes to mind The Warehouse District Now one word that comes to mind The Warehouse District In the Future 25

Do you think it is important to retain jobs and industry in the warehouse district? 1. Yes 2. Maybe 3. No 89% 5% 5% Yes Maybe No big ideas provide cool, varied place with a mix of uses a wider range of options (living, workplaces, entertainment), walkability protect existing businesses don t zone-out existing business (when owners are interested), jobs increase connectivity & create gateways connections to downtown, overall connectivity, underpasses as gateways improve mobility options bikes, pedestrians, transit, central parking locations enhance waterfront access advocate for 787 as a surface road, bikes along riverside parks 26

pleasant street park Existing pleasant street park small parcels can redevelop with access to nearby parking 27

argus square argus square 28

The Albany Form-Based Districts General Structure for New Citywide Codes 375-1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 375-2 ZONING DISTRICTS 375-3 PERMITTED USES 375-4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 375-5 ADMINISTRATION 375-6 DEFINITIONS What Can I Do On My Property? How Do I Have to Lay Out and Design the Site? Whose Approval Do I Need? 29

General Structure for New Citywide Codes 375-1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 375-2 ZONING DISTRICTS 375-3 PERMITTED USES 375-4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Form-Based Content is Integrated Here And Here And Here 375-5 ADMINISTRATION 375-6 DEFINITIONS Integration into Zoning Districts 375-2 ZONING DISTRICTS (D) Mixed-Use Districts (1) MU-NE Mixed-Use Neighborhood Edge (2) MU-NC Mixed-Use Neighborhood Center (3) MU-CU Mixed-Use Community Urban (4) MU-CH Mixed-Use Community Highway (5) MU-DT Mixed-Use Downtown (6) MU-CI Mixed-Use Campus/Institutional (7) MU-FW Mixed-Use Form-Based Warehouse District (8) MU-FC Mixed-Use Form-Based Central Avenue (9) MU-FS Mixed-Use Form-Based South End (10) MU-FM Mixed-Use Form-Based Midtown 30

Integration into Zoning Districts 375-2 ZONING DISTRICTS Integration into Zoning Districts 375-2 ZONING DISTRICTS 31

Integration into Permitted Uses 375-3 PERMITTED USES Table 375-3-1: Permitted Use Table P=Permitted Use C=Conditional Use A=Accessory Use T=Temporary Use V=Vacant Property Use Proposed Zoning District Current District Residential R 1L R 1M R 2 R T R M R 1LL & A R 1B R 2A R 2B & R 3A C & Mixed-Use R V MU MU NE NC MU MU CU MU CH DT MU CI MU FW MU FC B R 4 R O C 1 C 2 C 3 C O MU FS MU FM I 1 Special Purpose I 2 LC C M M 1 LC Use-Specific Standard in Section 375-3 LAND USE CATEGORY COMMERCIAL USES Food & Beverage Service Bar or Tavern C P P P C P P P P (C)(4)(e) Restaurant C C C P P P P P P P P P (C)(4)(o) Guest Accommodations Bed and Breakfast C C C C P P P C C C C A C C P P (C)(4)(f) Hotel V V C P P P C P P P P P Office and Services Funeral Home or Crematorium V C P P C V V V V Office A A P P P P P P P P P P P A (C)(4)(l) Personal or Business Service A A C P P P P P P P P P P P (C)(4)(n) Trade School P P P P P P P P P P Recreation & Entertainment Adult Entertainment P (C)(4)(a) Indoor Recreation or Entertainment C P P P P P P P P P V V (C)(4)(b) Outdoor Recreation or Entertainment P P C P C C C C C C C Integration into Development Standards 375-4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) Dimensional Standards Form-Based Zoning Standards Access, Circulation, Connectivity Subdivision of Land Parking and Loading Landscaping, Screening, Buffering Building and Streetscape Design Outdoor Lighting Signs Operating and Maintenance Most Form-Based Standards Appear Here But Some Count Appear in These Sections if Different Standards are Needed 32

Integration into Development Standards Table 375-4-5: Frontage Standards Summary Chart Heights Mixed-use Core Walkable Center Neighborhood General Connected Edge Waterfront Edge Industrial Warehouse Building Height 1 Story min 1 Story min 1 Story min 1 Story min 2 Story min 1 Story min 5 Stories max 4 Stories max 3 Stories max 2 Stories max 10 Stories max 3 Stories max Story Heights (Floor to Floor) Upper Stories Ground Finished Floor above sidewalk or finished grade Building Placement 10' min, 15' max 0' min (Comm.) 24" min (Res.) 10' min, 15' max 0' min (Comm.) 24" min (Res.) 10' min, 15' max 0' min (Comm.) 24" min (Res.) 10' min, 15' max 10' min, 15' max 24" min (Res.) 0' min (Comm.) 24" min (Res.) 10' min, 15' max 0' min Front Build-to Zone 0' min to 6' max 0' min to 10' 6' min to 18' max 24' min 0' min to 6' max 8' min Frontage Build-out 80% min 60% min 60% min 40% min 80% min n/a Side Setback (mid-block) 0' min to 24' 0' min to 24' 0' min, no max 5' min 0' min to 24' 8' min Parking Location Front Setback 20' min 20' min 20' min 24' min 20' min 20' min Side Setback (mid-block) 0' min 0' min 0' min 0' min 0' min 0' min Side Setback (corner) 10' min 10' min 10' min 10' min 10' min 10' min Rear Setback (lot) 5' min 5' min 5' min 5' min 5' min 0' min Frontage Elements Allowed Frontage Elements Forecourt, Stoop, Shopfront, Gallery, Arcade Terrace or Light- well, Forecourt, Stoop, Arcade Shopfront, Gallery Porch, Terrace or Lightwell, Forecourt, Stoop, Shopfront Porch, Stoop, Common Yard Terrace or Light- well, Forecourt, Stoop, Arcade, Shopfront, Gallery n/a 65 Integration into Development Standards 66 33

Questions and Discussion Victor Dover, FAICP Dover, Kohl & Partners Don Elliott, FAICP Clarion Associates 34